logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

14 Pages«<56789>»
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline James  
#301 Posted : Monday, November 7, 2011 5:09:04 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
SP wrote:
Good morning Yada...
Many different times I have heard you make reference to either 2023 or 2026 as a time when there will be a harvest of those who are walking in covenant with Him. You mentioned it again on last Fridays BTR radio program and that prompted me to search out some answers.
I understand that the YY chapters have not been edited yet but in those chapters where you address this topic you are using verses in 1 Thessalonians for some perspective.
Have you revisited this issue in your studies? In addition to Rev 3:10 have you found insightful passages in the T,P&P that shine His Light on this subject?
Am I correct to say that, in your understanding, you have come to trust that in one of these years soon, there will be a fulfillment of Taruw'ah where we will be escorted out of here before the last 7 years?
Thank you in advance for taking a moment to respond to my questions.
SP


Yada wrote:
SP,

You are correct in recognizing that I have not yet edited YY and I need to do so.

As for the harvest, there is a lot of material on it in the Towrah and Prophets. You'll find this presented in the Taruwah chapter. And also, there is a lot we can still learn from the Olivet Discourse and Revelation to help us understand what the prophets revealed. And apart from Yahowsha's testimony, based upon the Yowbel and Yah's Plan of Seven, we know that since Yahowah will return in year 6000 Yah, that's 2033 on our pagan calendars give a few years based upon prior fulfillments. Subtract seven years and you get the latest possible year for the harvest to occur being 2026. The only reason for mentioning 2023 is that Taruw'ah is on a Shabat that year, as it is in 2026, and Yah likes doing things like this on a Sabbath. But, all re can say for sure is that it will occur no later than Taruw'ah in 2026 (if 2033 is accurate). And while 2033 is based upon 40 Yowbel from 33 CE, there is a chance that the first four Feasts were fulfilled in 30, moving everything up 3 years.

There are only two things which change with denouncing Paul. First, it's a harvest not a rapture. Second, the "dead" don't go first followed by the living. Moreover, there won't be any physical bodies in heaven. Everything else Paul said about the harvest was based upon what he read in the Prophets, such as its association with Trumpets, so his testimony becomes irrelevant.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#302 Posted : Tuesday, December 6, 2011 9:14:32 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
C wrote:
Hi Yada,

I won't use the "th**k" word, but I have to say how much I ENJOYED yesterday's broadcast.

I think I was "coming out of her" my whole life in some respects. Even as a child, I loved Truth, and many things just didn't fit, or felt contradictory to me (even though this also felt like blasphemy at times!). Mercifully, my dad insisted we be kept OUT of church, so I was never really part of that system. Certainly, the last couple of years of seeking Truth have yielded much. Therefore, I didn't come to your broadcasts or written materials in shock. Nonetheless, just being in the so-called "Christian community," even from the outside looking in, leaves one with MUCH to be cleansed of.

My point is this: As a relatively new listener/reader, I can't express enough how valuable revisiting topics that may seem like old news to some of you is for those of us who are newer to your materials. The Light goes on, and not just on the immediate topic, but exponentially increases the Light that already exists.

I LOVE the Torah study, and have always enjoyed current events, but the addition of these "side questions" is also invaluable. One of my most serious issues is the Truth about the Messiah, and yesterday helped greatly.

C


Yada wrote:
C,

"Th**k" you for the encouraging letter. I am glad that you are finding this presentation of Yahowah's Word valuable. And I'm glad that your father kept you sufficiently afar from Christianity that your mind stayed active.

Once the truth is known, once the light goes on, everything makes sense.

I think the review of current events is valuable as well because the contrast between man's ways and Yah's Way is exposed.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#303 Posted : Tuesday, December 6, 2011 9:15:37 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
M wrote:
Yada:

So, in the context of - Cyg - the Christian phrase “Once saved, always saved” is not true! We, as Lots wife, have been given the opportunity to be free, in fact, she was on the way, already, to freedom, but she turned around - Cyg -, longed for the things of the Crucible, and so she “was turned into salt.”

What is you opinion?

M


Yada wrote:
M,

Lot's wife was on the way, but she did not complete the journey, so she was never saved, only temporarily spared. Once we come to know, understand, accept, and rely upon the terms and conditions of the Covenant, which include the seven steps we walk to God to become eternal and perfect, we are forever saved.

Lot's wife never benefited from Yahowah's means of reconciliation so she remained cyg - like dross.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#304 Posted : Tuesday, December 6, 2011 9:16:55 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
J wrote:
Shalom!

I am new to ‘coming out of her’ and really like your site except the Paul lies... why have you not fixed it? I can not find a true Paleo Hebrew Scripture translated in English... how do I help others to the TRUTH, if I know it’s out there, but can’t find it? Everyone is just a little off to what the Set-Apart Spirit is showing me... and telling them that Paul was a liar and sending them to your site does not help since you have not corrected it????? And also the Name of Yah’s son... is it Yahshua or Yahsha? Please !!!! I want to do HIS will and Know our saviors Name?

J


Yada wrote:
J,

Once I have completed the first five sections of the Introduction to God, which is attached, I'll edit the seven volumes of Yada Yah for many things including Pauline Doctrine, and then edit Questioning Paul, correcting the pronunciation of Yahowah's name and removing all references to the "Renewed Covenant." And while I suspect that will commence in a month's time, in that I'm currently fine-tuning the fourth and fifth sections of the ITG, it will take a year or more to properly edit all of YY. So I plan to do it in stages.

But in the mean time, you can read the first 800 pages of the ITG and the 600 pages of QP.

God's name is Yahowah. Yahowsha' simply means Yahowah Saves. The savior is therefore Yahowah.

It isn't that Yahowshua' is inaccurate, as it is written this way twice in the T,P,&P, but that since Yahowsha' is written over two hundred times and means "Yah Saves," it is preferred. That said, focus on Yahowah, not Yahowsha'.

Listen to the Set-Apart Spirit when observing the Towrah - Teaching of Yahowah, and when reading the Psalms and Prophets.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#305 Posted : Tuesday, December 6, 2011 9:18:06 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
M wrote:

Good morning Yada,

Listsening to the radio yerturday, you mentioned what the Muslims and the Catholic Church did to the Qumran Scrolls, so where can I find a true version of the facts surrounding this topic?
Or could you tell us a little bit about that on todays radio program.

Thank you

M


Yada wrote:
M,

There are a number of telling articles regarding the mistreatment of the Scrolls in Understanding the Dead Sea Scrolls - A Reader from the Biblical Archaeology Review. It was edited by Hershel Shanks.

It is a very long and messy story.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#306 Posted : Tuesday, December 6, 2011 9:19:24 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
SDR wrote:
Hi Yada;
sdr here, I just started a part time job so am not able to be 'present' always in the program. Anyway I just finished listening to the podcast of today's program and I just wanted to thank you for an excellent presentation. I know you and I and everyone have been through the abuse of going to 'church' ; and have probably been bewildered as to why It was such a miserable experience. Anyway, Imagine if 'church' were like your 'program' and what a different experience 'church' could be. I gotta tell you my friend, if 'church' was ever like 'the program'; people would show up in droves, or would they? Probably not. I know you're not into accolades so I won't give you any, but this program is the best thing that's ever happened to me and I know I'm not alone In saying so.

See Yah soon,
sdr


Yada wrote:
SDR,

I'm glad that you have a new job. That's great news.

I have wondered what would happen if Yah's message was proclaimed as we are doing in a "church" setting. Would people come to hear it? Or would it be as unpopular as it has been for the past 3500 years?

We now have 40 to 50 people listening live to the program and some 150 more listening to the archives. So when you consider that our show is on the internet and thus available to everyone who understands English, it doesn't bode well for the notion of filling a local church.

I'm pleased to hear that our review of Yah's Word is "the best thing that's ever happened" to you, because the same thing is true for me, and for every child who has embraced the Covenant. There is nothing better than listening to God and observing His Testimony.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#307 Posted : Tuesday, December 6, 2011 9:21:56 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
S wrote:
Hi,

I want to ask you to please help me understand the passages of Ezekiel 38 and 39. I really want to know that I understood incorrectly, so I don't want to say what I understood from it, and since I can't read the Hebrew scriptures, I desperately want someone to help me here, because it'll affect the decisions I'll make in the near future. Since I don't understand this too well, don't be afraid to be as harsh as you want in criticizing me, but one thing I need to know aside from any of that which affects my decisions, if by your math the world ends 2033, with 7 years before of you-know-what, does the seven years before that here mean that whatever it is that is supposed to happen starts 2019?

I know I'm being selfish, but I do my best to spread the truth, so know it's not about me.

Regards,

S


Yada wrote:
S,

Ezekiel 38 and 39 focus on Gog, the leader of the Magog federation of Islamic nations which attack Israel in mass during the Tribulation. So, knowing that they are going to be stopped by Yahowah in their attempt to destroy Israel ought not affect any decision you need to make unless for some odd reason you are considering becoming a Muslim and joining the mujahideen as a jihadist, or you are a member of the Masad tasked with the mission of thwarting them. I only speak of current events associated with Islam, and thus Magog, so that listeners come to trust Yahowah's testimony and so that the difference between man's ways and Yah's Way are clearly understood.

If your decisions on what to do are influenced by Yah's prophetic timing, then you should invest the effort required to understand His plan yourself. The fact that I came to realize that Year 6000 Yah is 2033 on our pagan calendar ought not influence any decision you make.

A far more important choice revolves around what you decide to do relative to the 5 terms and conditions of the Covenant. Because if you come to know, understand, accept, and then rely upon these provisions you won't be around during the Tribulation.

I am unaware of anything associated with 2019.

Since the only relevant issue is the Towrah's Teaching regarding the Covenant, I've attached the Introduction to God. I am years away from doing the research required to write a book on the Magog prophecies. After finishing the ITG, and editing YY and QP, I'm going to write my next book on the Whore of Babylon. Then I hope to begin writing a book on Tribulation predictions.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#308 Posted : Tuesday, December 6, 2011 9:23:02 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
B wrote:
Yada---These verses of Psalms 119:113-120--wow.
I burned them to a cd and my wife and i listened to them over and over. I too get goose bumps--goose bumps of elation because i have walked away from rel. etc. and am walking the path to YAh and on the flip side--goose bumps ( not of elation) for the millions of souls that have been decieved. This passage is truly bone-chilling for the lost.
That passage answers so many questions. Makes everything so clear, so simple.
Yah makes most things concerning man quite simple. All man does is complicate things and mess everything up.

Anyway, thought I would drop a line. I am listenening, taking notes, researching. can't get enough of what YAh has to say.
B


Yada wrote:
Hi B,

I am in complete agreement. This far P 119:113-120 have been my favorite. They answer so many essential questions by telling us not only how to observe the Towrah, but also by revealing the consequence of doing so. I am forever thankful to have studied and considered the 119th Psalm. It is the key which has unlocked many of the Towrah's treasures.

I've attached the most current version of the ITG.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#309 Posted : Tuesday, December 6, 2011 9:24:30 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
YT wrote:
Hey Yada. Wondering if you wouldn't mind shooting me a copy of the most current ITG. People keep asking me for a copy in my facebook group and I want to give them a current one. The group is called "Yahowah and His Word has never been popular" and I'm on there with Larry Hendricks and about 62 other people.. your work is copy pasted on there a lot by me and Larry as we help folks who are digging for truth. I don't know Larry, except within FB. The group doesn't allow Pauline doctrine or use of pagan terms like jesus, etc... so it is great that we spend less time arguing and more time searching/revealing truth as we come to learn. In other words we try to only allow people who are genuinely seeking the Truth to be part of the group.. and if they reveal that they aren't open to truth, we boot them out..
Yah's best...

YT


Yada wrote:
Hi YT. It is attached.

I like the name of your FB group. I'm pleased to hear that you are working with LH. He has been trying to share Yah's message on FB for many years now.

I only know Larry from email exchanges. But I have also found him consistently trying to help others by answering their questions regarding Yah. The fact that you have 62 "friends" is very encouraging.

Since Yah doesn't allow foul things in His home, it is good that you preclude them as well.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#310 Posted : Tuesday, December 6, 2011 9:26:44 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
L wrote:
Yada could you tell me what Yasha'yaho 45:23 really says ?


Thanks L


Yada wrote:
L,

Translating the passage isn't helpful outside of the context. Yah is speaking of judging Babylon. So if your concern is over bowing, then it's the context which presents who will be doing so. In fact, it is "she" which will bow down, addressing Babel.

The verse reads: "By Me (ba) I have promised (shaba' - sworn an oath) that He, the Word (dabar) of righteousness and vindication (tsadaqah) shall go out (yasa') from (min) My mouth (peh) and He shall not change anything, including His direction, or mislead (suwb). Indeed (ky), to Me (la - concerning Me) every (kol) knee (berek) she shall kneel down in reverence (kara' - she shall bend) and (wa) every tongue (kol lashown) she shall swear an oath (shaba' - she will make a promise)." (Yasha'Yahuw 45.23)

Kara' is the Hebrew word for "leg" so as a verb, it speaks of our legs either helping us stand next to Yah or bending at the knee being judged by Yah. But again, you have to set this affirmation in the context of the entire 45th and especially 46th chapter to understand its intended audience.
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#311 Posted : Wednesday, December 7, 2011 11:55:50 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
Koos wrote:
Dear Yada
I don't want to upset you by forwarding this newsletter of Joseph Dummond in which he talks about the "scholarly" Dr. Dave Perry telling us that we have understood shaul/paul incorrectly, that the Torah has apparently nothing to do with the covenants.
If you manage to make time and feel that you should take note of this article, here it is.
Again thanks for the updated version of ITG!!! Wow!!!
Shalom
Koos

Quote:
News Letter 5847-037
7th day of the 9th month 5847 years after the creation of Adam
The 9th Month in the Second year of the third Sabbatical Cycle
The Third Sabbatical Cycle of the 119th Jubilee Cycle
The Sabbatical Cycle of Earthquakes Famines, and Pestilences.
December 3, 2011

Shabbat Shalom Brethren,
Speaking things hard to understand, which they that are unlearned and unstable twist to their own destruction;

This is what Peter says in 2 Peter 3 about those things Paul writes about. This week I have a real treat from Dr. Dave Perry who is going to explain to you about the covenants of the bible. So many groups have this so screwed up. But when it is revealed in its simplest truths it is very plain to understand. And Dr. Perry has done that for us.

We also have the New Moon report for you from last Shabbat evening. As well as an update on the meeting we held in Barrie Ontario last Shabbat.

We are almost finished our study of the 613 laws. Showing what they are and how they are not exactly as they are supposed to be. We have done this to expose them to you. Some say we must keep them all if we are to keep Torah. But most have no clue exactly what they entail. We have now almost completed the study of them and shown how some have been twisted and some used more than once or are just the opposite of others we have before. Many of them are insightful for learning and like most other sources are to be used as a reference to the Torah itself.

It is by divine providence that we come to the conclusion of the 613 laws at the same time that Dr. Dave Perry`s article is presented. I only just realised this.
Once we have concluded the 613 laws next week, we will then begin our study into the two books of Macabees. This too is appropriate in light of Chanukah coming up this month. We will show you what exactly the two books say and how Chanukah came to be and the outright lies that are put forth as truth

We are also announcing our next major meeting in Dallas Texas and Houston respectfully. Ever since the meeting in Barrie Ontario last week new revelations have come forward. With Mathew Hasdell`s research and our group on face book (The Chronological Order of Prophecy Group) which has more and more brilliant people coming along and sharing what they are seeing, we will have more information that has not been shared before to share in Texas. If you can come then do not let any excuse keep you from this meeting. We have room for about 600. We hope to see you all there. Please help us by telling other groups of believers to come and learn about the Sabbatcal cycles and what they mean to us all in prophecy. Learn what your teachers will not show you.

And if you want to hear this in your area, then contact us ASAP . Take note it is free. No cost to you to have me come and explain these things in detail over the whole day. That is right I do not charge you to host me.


To read the rest of this weeks News letter go to http://www.sightedmoonnl.com/?page_id=756


To see past News Letters you can go to one of the following for each of the years they were posted.
2011 NEWS LETTERS FOR THE YEAR 5847 HTTP://WWW.SIGHTEDMOONNL.COM/?PAGE_ID=719
2010 NEWS LETTERS FOR THE YEAR 5846 HTTP://WWW.SIGHTEDMOONNL.COM/?PAGE_ID=619
2009 NEWS LETTERS FOR THE YEAR 5845 HTTP://WWW.SIGHTEDMOONNL.COM/?PAGE_ID=483
2008 NEWS LETTERS FOR THE YEAR 5844 HTTP://WWW.SIGHTEDMOON.COM/?PAGE_ID=219
2007 NEWS LETTERS FOR THE YEAR 5843 HTTP://WWW.SIGHTEDMOON.COM/?PAGE_ID=144


Thank you all for your enacouragement and support.

Shalom from
Grandpa Joseph F Dumond
www.sightedmoon.com
www.sightedmoonnl.com

May Yehovah bless you and guard you –
Yeh-va-reh-cheh-cha Yehovah veh-yeesh-meh-reh-cha
May Yehovah make his face shine upon you and be gracious unto you –
Ya-air Yehovah pa-naiv ay-leych-cha vee-chu-neh-cha
May Yehovah lift up his face onto you and give you peace –
Yee-sa Yehovah pa-nahv ay-leyh-cha veh-ya-same leh-cha Shalom

Yehovah is the name of the Creator. Yah is His short poetic name as in HalleluYah which is Hebrew for Praise be to Yah. Yehshua haMashiach is Hebrew for Jesus the Messiah, who was raised and was Jewish. The Hebrew word Shalom means much more than peace, hello or goodbye. In essence it means: Completeness, wholeness, health, peace,welfare, safety soundness, tranquillity, prosperity, perfectness, fullness, rest, harmony, the absence of agitation or discord. This is the highest form of greeting somebody, and with this we greet you in His precious name.


Yada wrote:
Koos,

As you know, I have no interest in correcting the false teaching of JD or DP. My interest is singular. I want to know and understand the Covenant as it is presented in the Towrah, and based upon that understanding, come to respect, accept, trust, and rely upon its terms and conditions. This is the only means to form a relationship with Yahowah and to be saved by Him.

To suggest that "the Torah has nothing to do with the covenants" is ignorant and irrational in every possible way. So much for scholarship which knows many things but understands nothing. The Covenant is explained exclusively in the Towrah, and there is only one Covenant.

yada

It is sad that so many are not only misled, but that they see fit to mislead.

As I continue to update and enhance the Introduction to God I'll send you revised drafts, including the one which is attached. It is my response to nincompoops like these.
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#312 Posted : Thursday, December 8, 2011 5:28:17 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
Koos wrote:
Thanks brother,
It was late when I opened that mail and I could not sleep properly afterwards. First thing I would like to know is whether this "scholarly" Dave Perry is a consistent Torah keeper or not. And I agree, to suggest that the Torah is separate from the Covenant, is down right stupid, confirming total ignorance of this "learned scholar".

Thanks again for the update. YAH bless you abundantly.
Koos


yada wrote:
Dear Koos,

Over the years we have grown close and have learned many things about Yahowah. And based upon what we have discovered, you have have become an apostle of the highest order in South Africa. So now, I am going to ask a favor of you, recognizing everything we have been through together...

For your personal edification and growth, and for the benefit of all of the souls you influence on behalf of Yahowah, which are many, please, when you have time, continue to read the Introduction to God that I have sent to you. By the time you get to the long review of the 119th Psalm you will appreciate why "Torah keeping" isn't the right approach or test. This realization is amazingly important and little understood.

The Torah is not comprised of laws to be kept, or obeyed, but instead instructions regarding the Covenant to be understood. To observe the Towrah is to closely examine it and thoughtfully consider what it teaches regarding the one and only Covenant relationship.

The singular means to engage in a relationship with Yahowah and the lone path to Yahowah are presented exclusively and precisely in the Towrah, but to benefit from them a person must come to know what the Towrah teaches, and then move through the process of considering, understanding, respecting, accepting, trusting, and relying upon Yahowah's provisions. And there isn't a scholar on earth who understands any of that - save Dowd/David - the inspired author of the longest Psalm.

When it comes to the Towrah, the 119th Psalm is the key to this entire process. It reveals what we should focus upon and what it means to God and to us. It tells us how to come to understand it, how to respond to it, and what it will do for us. Apart from the Towrah itself, Dowd's song to the Towrah is the most important document ever written.

Koos, I am not a scholar, and I don't have all of the answers, but Dowd/David was the most brilliant scholar in human history and you and I both know where to turn for answers.

Your friend,

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline Daniel  
#313 Posted : Thursday, December 8, 2011 9:02:54 AM(UTC)
Daniel
Joined: 10/24/2010(UTC)
Posts: 694
Location: Florida

GrandPaDrummond? wrote:
two books of Macabees. This too is appropriate in light of Chanukah coming up this month.

You'd better not mention Hanukkah around here.

Dem' fightin' words!
Nehemiah wrote:
"We carried our weapons with us at all times, even when we went for water" Nehemiah 4:23b

We would do well to follow Nehemiah's example! http://OurSafeHome.net
Offline James  
#314 Posted : Saturday, December 10, 2011 8:06:56 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
R wrote:
Hi Yada,

Yah has told us not to eat food sacrificed to idols. Halal slaughter requires an islamic slaughterman to slit the throat of the beast while it is conscious and allow it bleed to death while reciting a prayer to the adversary. Apart from the obvious cruelty of this practice a problem arises with halal-labeled food and food that is 'halal' but not labeled as such.
Some companies label their food as halal but others do not even though it has been designated as 'halal'. How can fish, milk, cereal, chocolate etc be labeled as halal - as occurs here in Australia? It seems to be a marketing ploy to label everything halal to gain greater sales. If we took all food to be 'halal' simply because some company or imman labeled it as such then we will starve if we take such labeling to mean the food has been sacrificed to idols. The adversary must be laughing: all he has to do is cause all food to be labeled halal.
My take on this is to avoid true halal foods such as halal slaughtered meat and ignore the rest of the labeling.
I know you must receive a huge number of emails and have little time but l would appreciate your opinion on this as I see it as a major issue that will only get worse with time.
Kind regards,
R


Yada wrote:
R,

It is only going to get worse. Satan would love to starve those who don't surrender to him.

It's always a good idea to follow Yah's instructions, so I'd avoid food labeled "Halal." That is Satan's first name after all (Halal ben Shachar). But, it is far more important to observe the Towrah in such a way that a person comes to know and understand what it teaches regarding the Covenant.

While it is a bad idea, accepting Halal food will not kill anyone. But if a person does not know, understand, and accept the five terms and conditions associated with the Covenant, they will die. So, I'd focus on the bigger issue.

If you'd like a copy of the Introduction to God which presents the Towrah in this light, I'll gladly share it with you.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#315 Posted : Saturday, December 10, 2011 8:09:33 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
A wrote:
Hi Yada,
Forgive me for intruding with this. I know it is only possible to make a best guess of the exact pronunciation of the Father’s Name, but I have a strong drive to overturn all of the rocks.

Several weeks ago I asked you for a copy of ITG (Thank you by the way). One of the reasons I wanted to read it before completion was for your justification of the pronunciation of YHWH. I agree with you on most points, but have come to a personal theory that the correct pronunciation of Father Yah’s full name is Yahuwah pronounced with the 2nd syllable accented.

In ITG you promote vav pronounced ow as in shalowm, torwah, elowah and gowym, with the evidence being that these are the most common words containing vav. However, later in ITG you talk about the 265 names/words containing Yah. In all of these words, which contain the preceding letters yod-he, you have transliterated the pronunciation as yahuw. My contention is if yod-he-vav is Yahuw in these 265 words, then it is Yahuw in Yahuwah (yod-he-vav-he). The ow sound in your initial four words may still be correct since the word structure is different.

Also, many of the 265 words naturally support the 2nd syllable accent of Yahuw, even in traditional Hebrew pronunciation. (eg: Mathithyahuw in Hebrew dictionary)
I only know what little Hebrew grammer and pronunciation I have gleaned from YY, so I am in no position to be dogmatic about my theory, so I am eager for your reply/rebuttal.

Thank you for your time,
Sincerely,
A


Yada wrote:
A,

Personally I'm convinced that it is Yahowah because of the evidence that I've shared and you have cited. Towrah was the clincher for me. And I'm of the opinion that the proper pronunciation of the other 265 names is also Yahow. But since every lexicon uses Yahuw, I have cited them that way in case readers want to look them up for their own edification.

Also recognize that there are many words where o's and u's are pronounced identically.

The best tool available to us regarding the proper pronunciation of the Hebrew Wah is the pronunciation of the most common words containing the Wah.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline Steve in PA  
#316 Posted : Saturday, December 10, 2011 2:19:47 PM(UTC)
Steve in PA
Joined: 3/31/2010(UTC)
Posts: 157
Location: PA

Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 3 post(s)
*** James I wanted to share something and I thought this would be a good place to put it... in it I share a personal email exchange. That does not quite follow the format of the YY letters... so if you feel it needs to be moved or removed, I'm fine with whatever.***

Sorry... this is a little long.

Just wanted to share something here. I'm pretty excited because I am actually learning about Yahowah and coming to understand His plan to where I understand it and can share it confidently.

Just a few short years ago when I first read some of YY, I was like, "what???". Slowly but surely I began to study in earnest both Scripture and different sections of YY as well as developing some friendships with others who are learning His Truths.

Recently it's like the light turned on and it just makes sense. His plan is really simple when you think about it. I understand that I could spend lifetimes studying and learning the depth of His Word but I know and understand the essential basics of who He is and what His plan is and He is Awesome!

I had this, "I got it" moment earlier today when I was able to reply to an email from a friend that I am sharing Yahowah with. What was exciting to me was that I didn't have to look at any notes or anything and I was able to just type up my reply. It may seem that I am just parroting Yada but that is not really the case. Yada has pretty much just exposed a vain of truth as in a gold mine and that truth has just resonated and found a home in my being.

Anyway the following is a copy of the email I received from my friend and my reply...

> Hi Steve,
>
> I tried to about the manuscript you sent so I could look at it and I am
> not able to open it. I have a Mac and that could be the problem. Maybe you
> could send it in a PDF file.
>
> I too had become disillusioned with God, the church, Christianity years
> ago. In fact the last time we were together I was dealing with it then. I
> felt He wasn't even keeping His word as He promised. I wasn't even sure
> that there was a God anymore. I had turned to alcohol and anger to deal
> with it. I would sometimes challenge other believers throwing doubting
> comments at them. Know I hope I caused no one to stumble.
>
> I had finally reached and ending point and realizing that there was a God
> just said to Him, "I'll go down any road or believe system you want, I
> just want to do Your will and be right with You and I don't care what
> anyone else has to say or think." I can still hear Him tell me Christ is
> the way for me to go.
>
> The system might be at fault but Christ isn't. Even the Jewish history
> book Josephus makes a brief mention of Him. It hasn't always been an easy
> road but it's the one I'm on. I figure you choose the word Messiah over
> Jesus or Christ but that is how I know it.
>
> Hope we're still friends and can even talk about it, debate it and be able
> to disagree on it sometimes. Look forward to hearing from you and reading
> the manuscript.
>
> Your friend,
> Bill
>
>Hey Bill,
I did find a .pdf version... it's at
http://www.poweronhigh.c...roduction%20to%20God.pdf
This is an older version of the draft and has only 729 pages. lol
The one I sent you has over a 1000.
If that link does not work for some reason... I did a google search for...
"An Introduction to God".pdf and it was the second link shown.

His title is more accurately Ma'saeYah which means "doing the work of Yah"
in Hebrew. His name in Hebrew is Yahowsha meaning "Yahowah Saves". Yahowah
(YHWH) is the name of the Father edited out and replaced with LORD some 7000
times in Scripture.

What I am learning and walking in now is fresh and alive. It is truly a
relationship and far from any religious practice. I am not in some kind of
bondage where I am trying to "do" all His commandments and "keep the law".
He is more interested in us observing, guarding and valuing His instructions
and guidance, which is what "Shamar Towrah" means... errantly translated
"keep the law".

I fully understand that I can not earn and or do any work(s) for my
salvation. It is a gift and He has done all the work. Though, We are called
to respond and that does require that we do something. That being, learn the
truth about Him and choose to accept His terms and conditions of His Family
Relationship Agreement, His Covenant and then learn about, understand and
walk on the only path He provided. That path is understanding and walking
in His Feasts, His Called-Out Assembly meetings. The first being
"Passover"... He is the Door to the Path. Without the work He did there by
becoming our sacrificial Lamb we would be lost. He then paid the penalty for
our sin and redeemed us removing our sin from His sight on the "Feast of
Unleavened Bread". He was the "First Fruit" (another of His Feasts) where
now we also are born anew spiritually into His Family. Seven weeks later...
the "Feast of Sevens" or "Pentecost" where He empowers us with His Set-Apart
Spirit, leading us to "The Feast of Trumpets" where we boldly shout out and
declare His Awesomeness! This leads to the "Feast of Reconciliations" where
we are covered by His Garment of Light allowing us to stand in His presence.
Ultimately leading to us camping out and living with Him in His Kingdom
represented by "The Feast of Tabernacles".

I did not copy and paste the above. I just now wrote that from what I am
learning and it is exciting!
We can come to know Him where we can fully trust and rely on Him. This is
what I am doing and this is what I am excited about. The mind blowing thing
about it is, I know now, by doing this, He promises to know me and remember
me in His Kingdom where I will be born a spiritual being with my soul (who I
am) as a member of His Family. Wow!

HalleluYah!

Offline Steve in PA  
#317 Posted : Sunday, December 11, 2011 2:46:58 AM(UTC)
Steve in PA
Joined: 3/31/2010(UTC)
Posts: 157
Location: PA

Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 3 post(s)
*** I need to make one correction to the above. The phrase I used, "vain of truth", should be, "vein of truth". One vowel change... big difference in meaning.***
Offline Daniel  
#318 Posted : Sunday, December 11, 2011 3:54:08 AM(UTC)
Daniel
Joined: 10/24/2010(UTC)
Posts: 694
Location: Florida

eh steve wrote:
*** One vowel change... big difference in meaning.***



Just like in the Masoretic text. Good lesson.
Nehemiah wrote:
"We carried our weapons with us at all times, even when we went for water" Nehemiah 4:23b

We would do well to follow Nehemiah's example! http://OurSafeHome.net
Offline James  
#319 Posted : Monday, December 19, 2011 5:11:20 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
Dowd wrote:
Hello Yada,

Greetings in Yahowah's name. There is much happening in the industry I have been a part of for most of my working life. November 9 last year saw the confirmation that the bacterial kiwifruit vine disease Psa had been discovered in Te Puke Gold kiwifruit orchards. Despite quarantine procedures and best endeavours to prevent the spread of the disease, it has now established itself in all kiwifruit growing regions of New Zealand. The net result is the removal of 80% of the Gold plantings in the Western Bay of Plenty and the loss of thousands of jobs in orchards and support industries. Share prices of post-harvest facilities have plummeted and orchard values have fallen to bare land prices.

Yada wrote:
Hello Dowd. I think about you all the time and wonder how you are doing. It is always nice to hear from you, my friend.

This is obviously horrible news. But considering what you have told me about the attitudes towards Yahowah and His Towrah of those you work for it is hard to express sympathy for the spread of this disease. Albeit, since it could affect you, I am sorry.

A reading of Yahowsha's Olivet Discourse prompts us to realize that food will become a huge problem over the next 20 years, with changes in weather and the onset of diseases destroying crop production. I expect the current diseases affecting wheat in Africa to spread worldwide.


The Green and Gold kiwifruit orchards I manage are faring relatively well. We are taking a wait and see approach, removing affected canes where they appear while carrying as much crop through to harvest as we can. It is a stressful time with constant monitoring and a tripling of the normal cost of spraying. If/when the orchards succumb to the disease, my management is at high risk. Because of this, I have begun a new business and it is taking most of my free time.

Yada wrote:
I'm pleased to hear that your business is still viable and that you are already pursuing other options.


I have been remiss in assisting with the editing and I apologise for this. I have continued to fall deeper in love with Yah's Towrah prescriptions for living. This journey through Dowd's Mizmowr/Song 119, is life-transforming. I am replenished daily by the YY radio shows.

Yada wrote:
I've attached a current draft. I'm currently editing the Covenant section. When you have time I'd love to read your suggestions for improvement.

I like you have fallen in love with the life-transforming message of the 119th Psalm because of the way it teaches us to observe Yah's Towrah. It is the most enlightening documents I've ever considered. This is so much more fun than Questioning Paul or refuting Muhammad.


On another matter, I have Ken Power as a facebook 'friend'. I have reported to you before my concerns for Ken and he continues to keep a foot firmly in the "Christian" camp. Frankly I cannot read much of what Ken quotes in his Random thoughts for the day. He's up to #404 so he's had a lot of random thoughts.

Yada wrote:
My last meeting with KP did not go well. From what I can tell he has retreated back into Christianity and remains beguiled by Paul. It breaks my heart. I'd so love for him to stop writing for a while and read QP and the ITG.



Here's a response from another "Christian" facebook "friend" who apparently knows 'Christmas' and 'Ishtar' are pagan and knows our Heavenly Father's name as Yahweh. I shared a few things with him and these replies were his response. The thread of his facebook discussion surrounded the timing of the 'crucifixion.' His thinking is so errant, there is no hope for him and he represents many thousands of others who have made the transition away from their 'Chirche" but still cling to the teachings of Sha'uwl. They can never be reconciled to Yahowah while they cling to their religion, patriotism and politics as he does ad nauseum.

Yada wrote:
Yes, so long as a person clings to man's teachings, whether they be religious or political, there is no hope of them coming to know or understand Yahowah. There is a reason that the prerequisite of the Covenant is to walk away from all things babel.


Christian wrote:
@ Dowd and All..
While I understand and agree with your description of the issues, problems and confusion related to the replacement theology of Christianity, I have to disagree about your position on Paul. The very fact that the Hellenized Jews and the anti-Semitic Gentiles perverted the meaning and translations of Scriptures attest largely as to why Paul is misunderstood. His words were not faithfully translated and have been perverted from the start of his ministry.
Yada wrote:
This excuse is factually untrue. We have very early and comprehensive codices on all of Paul's letters. This is the argument I set out to make in QP, but it was consistently contradicted by the evidence.


I have read much on the defamation of Paul's charator and writtings and have found little evidence in any of the authors arguments. I do see petty issues, that are subject to interpretation, being blown out of proportion and used to completely discredit Paul, without any real cause.
Yada wrote:
QP discredits Paul by comparing what Paul wrote to what Yahowah and Yahowsha' say. The evidence contained therein cannot be dismissed so ignorantly or superficially. This person has not made this comparison and thus remains beguiled.


If we sift through all the false doctrines of Christianity and look deep into the Hebraic roots of the Word, Paul's teachings are in alignment with the message that Messiah and His Disciples were teaching--Torah.
Yada wrote:
So, stating the opposite of what the evidence actually reveals without any evidence to prove otherwise serves as proof in this person's mind. Sad. This is a statement of "faith," not "reason."

Paul's verbose letters are often confusing to many because they were written in another cultural context and were instructions tailored to the specific problems facing each assemble of believers.
Yada wrote:
The fact that Paul's letters are confusing demonstrates that they were poorly written and thus not inspired by God. And the fact that they address "another cultural context" other than Yisra'el, the Covenant, and Towrah, proves the same. God does not have a different plan for different people.

We are not always completely aware of the details of problems Paul was addressing so, we can not make righteous judgments without all the pertinent information.
Yada wrote:
Using this logic, or lack there of, we cannot judge Paul, therefore we ought to accept him. Why would anyone choose to accept that which they cannot prove to be valid or even understand?
Yahowah gave us the means to judge whether or not someone spoke for Him or not. Paul failed this test. And this person is ignorant of the test because they don't know the Towrah.


Although there were some issues with James and Peter, Paul supported the Disciples in both word and deed and they supported him (Acts 15)..
Yada wrote:
It is amazing that someone could read something which proves that Paul was opposed to the actual Disciples in both word and deed and yet believe that they supported him. Stunning.
As you know, this exposes the reason that a religious person cannot be saved. They are unaffected by evidence and reason.


To say otherwise would not be fair or just to the teachings of Paul and many others. Just because someone is misunderstood is no reason to dismiss the truth he reveals. We can not shoot the messenger because the people who received the message did not understand.
We can find fault with many of Messiah's followers but, that is not the purpose of our faith. Just like they, we should be following Torah and not putting our faith in the misused or misunderstood words of a Disciple, taken out of context and explained by misguided religious leaders.
Yada wrote:
And yet this person doesn't "follow the Towrah," and has instead placed their "faith in the misused or misunderstood words of a 'Disciple' taken out of context and explained by misguided religious leaders." If he or she observed the Towrah, they would condemn Paul for contradicting it.
David, I read the rest of this, and as you have correctly assessed, this people cannot be helped. I wouldn't waste my time. His arguments against QP reveal that he or she never made it past the opening chapter, in effect proving your point and mine.



Followed by this...

Chirstian wrote:
..Your statement of, "The Ruach Qodesh, our Spiritual Mother, departed before His soul descended into She'owl. ", calls into question your understanding of the faith, as I know it. I have never heard a righteous man speak of the set apart Spirit in these "Mother" terms but, have heard rambling self-righteous false teachers try to use or interject this pagan term into their comments more than once before. I hope this is not the case here. Our Messiah's "soul" did not descend into She'owl, His Spirit did. He did not have a living "soul", He was a "Living Soul"--Gen 2:7...
...You said, " Yahowsha's earthly body was vaporized before daybreak, leaving an empty tomb. ", as if there is some Scripture that confirms this event. If there is, I have never read it. I have never even heard this kind of description being given for the events that occurred that day so, if you have Scripture to share with us on this "Vaporization", I would like to see it..
..Did you have a point to your comments or did you just want to ramble on, to somehow prove your academic prowess? I see no agreement or disagreement with the Wednesday burial discussed here but, I may have missed that point in your comments.
...You say to me, "If you can read the entirety of the 'Questioning Paul' volumes, starting with the 'Letter to the Reader', and still think Sha'uwl is misunderstood and his story has been hijacked, then there is nothing more that can be done for you. "..
..Well, I have tried to read this before and found it boring, inaccurate, venomous and assuming. Opinions are interjected and assumptions are made without any hard facts or room for doubt. If Paul was a false prophet, as you assert, then he even fooled the Disciples of Messiah, as they supported him, and he them. If you are correct then, we need to throw out several NT books and ignore many of the words of James, Luke, Peter and others. If Paul was a liar, fraud and demon possessed, as you clearly imply here then, where was the Holy Spirit or the Righteous discernment of the Disciples? Were they all fooled? Were they all frauds as well? Do we now need to change the NT and re-write and re-teach what the Disciples really meant? Can it be that you have fallen for the false teachings of religious leaders, like the ones Peter is speaking of in 2 Peter 3:15-17?
...I have often heard this hate mongering anti-Paul rhetoric before and as a truth seeker, tried to objectively look for some substance in these accusations. I have found none, as of yet. Of course, you are free to believe and think as you like. But, please don't come on my thread and present your material or opinion in such a disrespectful or confrontational way in the future. This is not needed or appreciated. The truth can be told without malice and it speaks for itself, in and from His Word.

My response to him was: All the very best to you _______________. There is a gulf far too wide to meld your beliefs and faith into my trust and reliance.


Yada wrote:
That is true. You cannot reason with this person. And even if you were to address every "argument", or actually opinion, they raise, refuting all of them with Yahowah's Word, it would not influence this person to reject their faith.


While I laid out the timeline and purpose for Pesach, Matsah and Bikuwrym in 33CE and the Ma'aseyah Yahowsha's role in fulfilling them, it appears that there is nothing we can say to the religious person that can dissuade them from the dead end pathway they follow and Sha'uwl is largely responsible. I am daily realizing the extent of this man's satanic deception and the billions of souls his false teachings have led, and continue to lead, astray. Life lesson 1/01 - Be circumspect who you accept as facebook friends.

I am reading along with Mizmowr/Song 119 in the Towrah section and would dearly love an updated version if you have one to send. The one I am studying is version 9 dated 3 September, 2011.
Yada wrote:
I've attached it, Dowd. Blessings to you and to your family, especially your sons.

Your brother in Yah,
Yada


May Yahowah bless you Yada

Your brother in Yah
Dowd


Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#320 Posted : Monday, December 19, 2011 5:13:45 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
R wrote:
Hi Yada,


I enjoyed participating in the chat room during one of the ITG shows last week. I skipped sleep to participate, but the rewards were worth it.

Yada wrote:
The fact that you forewent sleep to learn tells me that you will come to find every answer you are seeking. This is the attitude that drove Dowd to learn.


On the note of Logos, and translation in general, how long did it take before you were feeling comfortable with the task?

Yada wrote:
I am only now starting to feel somewhat comfortable, and I've been doing this six days a week, eight hours a day, for seven years now. When I look at some of my early translations I'm often embarrassed. And I know that sever years from now, I'll be disappointed by what I'm doing today. But that is the epitome of learning. It is the essence of growing. If we didn't get better, if we didn't grow in understanding, life wouldn't have much meaning or purpose. So, start, learn, improve, and grow.


I think my worst grades were in English class and any attempt at other languages were pathetic.

Yada wrote:
Me too. It is one of the reasons I remind readers and listeners that I'm unqualified.


As I look at the individual words in Hebrew I end up with more questions about the structure of the words and sentences than I know where to start with.

Yada wrote:
The way I solve this problem is to read the sentence first using an interlinear. That is a huge help.


I know that to end with a translation anywhere near coherent I need to be aware of sentence structure, grammar and context among other things, and I'm feeling pretty lost.

Yada wrote:
Working from Hebrew to English we will always be a bit lost. The stems, conjugations, and moods of Hebrew, and even the lack of tenses, make it a real challenge. The incorporation of pronouns, conjunctions, and prepositions into the words is also a challenge for those of us more familiar with English. And then there are issues of gender and a complete lack of punctuation. Then we resolve the vocalization issues. So this will never be easy. But is does not have to be easy to be beneficial.

Your initial goal should be to understand the words rather than the grammar. With the help of lexicons that is much easier than understanding very unfamiliar and uncommon grammar. Moreover, the message is in the word meanings.



I've looked into the Hebrew instructional books in the Logos program and they seem to rely on the vowel points to understand the language and I have heard you say that these do more harm than good, or something like that. Would you recommend that I accept the vowel pointing in order to get through the course work or is there a better route to take.

Yada wrote:
The grammar indications come mostly from added letter prefixes and suffixes, not vowel pointing. I use the grammar denotations and explanations provided by Logos.


I'm just smart enough to know that I'm not smart. Yahowah's Towrah implies that a certain level of intellectual engagement is necessary to know Yah. This is just enough for me to feel really frustrated with my abilities.

If you can offer any advice or encouragement, it would be greatly appreciated.

Yahowah bless,
R

Yada wrote:
At first, I focused only on the word meanings and then sought to tie the meanings together into thoughts. Then I began to pay more attention to the pronouns, prepositions, conjunctions, and punctuation options. Then I began to focus on the tenses, stems, conjunctions, and moods. So it’s a process. And I've always used interlinears as a handrail. And even then, my goal has never been to create the most fluid or grammatically correct translation, but instead to understand what is being revealed. And for that, most of the meaning is found in the words themselves. Study them and you will find the answers you seek.

I do not think that "being smart" is an asset in this regard. Having the right attitude, being willing to invest the time, having an open mind, and striving to view everything from the proper perspective is more beneficial.

You are doing this to engage in a conversation with Yah, to listen to Him, to learn, to grow, but not to publish the New R Translation. So, do as Dowd did and enjoy the journey.

Yada


Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#321 Posted : Thursday, December 22, 2011 5:40:25 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
M wrote:
Yada, thanks so much for making time to respond to my query. I have not yet had the chance to read ITG, but will begin in earnest tomorrow and will comment if I have any questions.

There is one aspect that you should know about to cast a wider net and really you have already touched on the matter. I began looking for information while I was in Afghanistan, the searches using the name "Yahweh" provided no satisfactory results and even when I returned to the US and tried to find something, nothing useful came up. They only way I happened to run into your work was listening to a radio program you were being interviewed on in Wyoming a week or two ago. I read your first two books and knew about you, so when I heard your name on the program, I wrote down your web site to follow up, not really expecting to find the gold mine of spiritual knowledge.
I have no idea about matters related to IT, but if some way could be found to get your work in the front using the major search engines, then this would be a real advantage. I know you are aware of the problem which is why you a are using the more conventional spelling of our Father's name on the web site rather than the more accurate spelling as this would yield few if any results.

One further point, I understand the need not to be a religion or any thing that smells like it, but really some provision should be made for Baptism for those wishing to be adopted as Sons and Daughters of Yah, likely you have already thought of the matter and may have addressed it in ITG, if so please excuse my comments. I believe spiritually mature individuals should make themselves available to address this important matter and not necessarily wait until the time of the Festivals. Being baptised by those still in bondage to religion does not seem appropriate. If you could please address this on your program then others could be informed as well.

Thanks so much for your time and warmest regards,

M


Yada wrote:
M,

Our primary website is still Yada Yahweh, although that will change with time, eventually becoming Yada Yah. And we still feature the incorrect pronunciation of Yahowah's name on the homepage to facilitate searches using Yahweh. Even the ITG, which will soon be featured on the site, begins with a reference to Yahweh for this reason. But shy of paying for placement, that is about all we can do. Moreover, 80% of those who find Yada Yahweh do so through the Prophet of Doom site. I have done 3000 radio interviews to promote it, so it is reasonably well known.

Besides, I made a deal with God on YY, whereby I agreed to study and write and He agreed to promote the result, bringing it to the attention of those He thought it would benefit. Fact is, most people are either religious or closed minded, so most of what is revealed in Yada Yahweh, Questioning Paul, and now the Introduction to God, is of no value to them.

I've done Dave's show on KGAB for 10 years now, starting before we invaded Afghanistan. Considering my open animosity to the Afghanistan and Iraqi wars, and as someone who served in Afghanistan, I am surprised that you bothered to do a search. But I'm glad you did. Our invasion of both countries made bad situations much worse and will turn out to be suicidal.

Yahowah says nothing of baptism, especially as Christians practice it, and He is the source of direction regarding the Covenant and salvation. And as you will discover, the Christian NT is so poorly preserved, and often so inaccurate, that it cannot be trusted on issues which have a religious association. And Yahowsha's testimony has to be viewed from the perspective of the Towrah to be understood.

In that light, we find that water is symbolic of cleansing and birth in the Towrah. This is how I view baptism. It is therefore something which can aid our understanding of the role of the Set-Apart Spirit. But as an act, it plays no role in your relationship with Yah, or with your salvation. And as you have stated, the people willing to do it would be the wrong people to associate with, especially in this regard.

Consider the instruction as "immerse" everyone in the Way. Teach them the Towrah.

Yada


M wrote:
Yada sorry to bother, I could not find where the below is quote in the scripture, this is from around page 85 in ITG, the discussion was of Zackariah 12.


Transitioning to the next query, God asked: “Who is He who wraps up and envelops, actually giving birth by way of (my tsarar – who is He who encloses, covers, bears children, mends, mediates, and restores through) the waters (maym – the source of life and cleansing) in the garment (ba ha simlah – a feminine noun meaning apparel which covers and adorns)?” Affirming the enduring truth incarnate in the “‘acaph ruwach – spiritual harvest,” in the fourth question, tsarar maym ba ha simlah, which describes the process of “enveloping us in a cleansing garment which restores us, enabling us to be born anew into God’s family,” was also penned in the qal perfect.


Perhaps my translation is so poorly worded as to not be comparable.

Regards,

M


Yada wrote:
M,

The quote is from Proverbs 30:4-5. Here is the entire thing...

It begins by asking seven rather extraordinary questions:

Who is He who has actually descended from (my yarad – who has lowered and diminished Himself) and who is He who reliably ascends to (wa ‘alah – who offers Himself up as a sacrifice and then goes up and lifts up to) heaven (shamaym – the spiritual realm of God)? Who is He who genuinely gathers and receives the spiritual harvest (my ‘acaph ruwach – who is He who draws together, collects, associates with, and spiritually joins a remnant) in (ba) the palms of His hands (chophen)? Who is He who wraps up and envelops, actually giving birth by way of (my tsarar – who is He who encloses, covers, bears children, mends, mediates, and restores through) the waters (maym – the source of life and cleansing) in the garment (ba ha simlah – a feminine noun meaning apparel which covers and adorns)? Who is He finally who comes onto the scene, stands upright, completes the mission, enabling others to stand without ceasing, establishing (my quwm ‘ephec – who is He who in the end takes a stand, rises up, and completely restores) the entire (kol – the whole) earth (‘erets ­– realm and land)? What is (mah) His personal and proper name (shem – moniker, identification, and renown)? And what is (wa mah) His Son’s (ben) personal and proper name (shem)? Surely (ky) you know (yada’ – you recognize and understand, you are acquainted with it and you acknowledge it).” (Masal / Word Pictures / Proverbs 30:4)

Who is He who has actually descended from (my yarad – who has lowered and diminished Himself) and who is He who reliably ascends to (wa ‘alah – who offers Himself up as a sacrifice and then goes up and lifts up to) heaven (shamaym – the spiritual realm of God)?”


Who is He who genuinely gathers and receives the spiritual harvest (my ‘acaph ruwach – who is He who draws together, collects, associates with, and spiritually joins a remnant) in (ba) the palms of His hands (chophen)?”
Who is He who wraps up and envelops, actually giving birth by way of (my tsarar – who is He who encloses, covers, bears children, mends, mediates, and restores through) the waters (maym – the source of life and cleansing) in the garment (ba ha simlah – a feminine noun meaning apparel which covers and adorns)?”

Who is He finally who comes onto the scene, stands upright, completes the mission, enabling others to stand without ceasing, establishing (my quwm ‘ephec – who is He who in the end takes a stand, rises up, and completely restores) the entire (kol – the whole) earth (‘erets ­– realm and land)?”

What is (mah) His personal and proper name (shem – moniker, identification, and renown)? And what is (wa mah) His Son’s (ben) personal and proper name (shem)? Surely (ky) you know (yada’ – you recognize and understand, you are acquainted with it and you acknowledge it).”

Every (kol – the entire) Word (‘imrah – saying, communication, utterance, instruction, teaching, command, and promise) of God (‘elowah) being pure, tested, and true, is (tsaraph – being refined, precious, flawless, and worthy, exists as) a gift and a shield (magen / megen – a present protective enclosure and covering which surrounds, defends, and saves) for those who (huw’ la ha) put their trust (chasah – those who take refuge in, who seek safety, salvation, protection, and rest through reliance) in Him (ba) .” (Masal / Word Pictures / Proverbs 30:5)

Yada


M wrote:
Yada, Many Thanks for the fine program today, it must make you crazy to see regular listeners discussing (If they are talking they are not listening) mundane issues such as bottles of Scotch while you are discussing important issues and have taken such care and time to prepare something that is worth listening to. Most of us are listening, so do not become discouraged. I appreciate the quality of your work and obvious preparation.

In addition to the numbers you quote of casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan, I can tell you there are other numbers of people which are not reflected in the contractor body count. In KAF (Kandahar) there are large numbers of Africans, Filipino, Bosnia’s and other nationalities from all over working on this base and other FOB’s (Forward Operations Base) that are not included because they’re not American citizens. The rocket attacks at KAF happen three sometimes more times a week, I have been though dozens of these episodes and not all result in casualties, but many do. I lost 8 Nepalese in a helicopter crash, I am sure nobody included these men in the count as their lives were only important to their families, there is more than one way to die in this theater.

Please excuse me if this is inappropriate to discuss with you, but I really do not wish to return to Afghanistan to work, if you know of someone who is looking for a Project Manager/Builder then please forward my email address. My eight year old son and I are completely alone in this world and in difficult circumstance which is why I take the chance to bother you. I am PMP Certified and received my General Contractors License in the State of California in 1985. As you do not know me or who I am, attached is a recent letter to qualify my abilities. Again, please excuse if this offends.

Warmest Regards,

M


Yada wrote:
M,
The scotch discussion in the midst of the presentation of the consequence of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars wasn't my favorite, but most of the time the guys in the chat room make very good points and add to the discussion.

I remember a news story which came out regarding the death of Nepalese workers in Afghanistan. But while this was reported, I like you know that their deaths didn't make anyone's list because they were neither Iraqi, Afghani, American, or NATO. It is sad that we have so little regard for lives other than our own.

Work is hard to come by these days, especially in construction, and especially in California. But if I hear from someone looking to hire a good person with experience, I'll send them your way.

Yada


M wrote:
Yada, regarding today's show, I have personally heard military and former military people express the view "that killing people is fun", I don't think this is the view of the majority of people serving in the military, however the Marines are trained killers, we never had incoming on bases where the Marines were in control, I believe the Taliban considered it too expensive to mess with.

Regards,

M


Yada wrote:
Yes, M, I agree that this feeling is rather pervasive among those who volunteer to kill. They are not only willing to kill, but trained to kill, even indoctrinated to believe that killing is a service.

It's interesting that the Muslims respected fellow killers.

Thanks for sharing this Mark.

Yada


M wrote:
Yada, I am not quite half way through ITG, and I have to say I am very conflicted, reading your translations of the Towrah is like seeing new vistas on ground I know and cherish, the conflict is whether to tarry a bit, or see what is beyond. I have to slow down and tarry as much as I can stand as it is my nature to explore the horizon, study really does require discipline.

On page 350 you translate Masal 28:4-5 (And (wa) those who observe (shamar) the Towrah (Towrah) take the initiative to oppose and resist them (garah ba).) with an interesting phase "take the initiative" in opposing those that reject the Towrah, can you please elaborate on what Hebrew word would be equivalent to "Initiative". I have always actively resisted those who are opposed (Secularists) to acknowledging The Creator (sometimes not politely, but never crudely), if I have a Towrah based reason to continue, then it would be my pleasure to engage.
I hope you had a great time with your son, there really is nothing better than hanging out with your Kid.

Warmest Regards,

M


Yada wrote:
Hi M,

Wow, being half way through the ITG is a major investment of time. I am pleased to learn that it has opened up new vistas for you. It has done the same for me.

Any suggestions on how to improve it?

I am often conflicted as well. I always want to linger, and ponder the implications, but at the same time, I always want to look around the next bend and see what's there. That is why I'm enjoying the radio program. I'm able to go back and linger a while longer on these wonderful passages.

Garah is just the first of hundreds of times that you will find a Towrah on taking the initiative and overtly opposing those things which lead people astray. So you are doing the right thing.

The primary definition of garah is to "initiate conflict, to provoke, to contend, to meddle, to stir up strife, to be hostile, and to actively resist." It is even defined as "waging war while aggressively and excitedly attacking a foe." So, prepare and then engage in open hostility to false religious teaching.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#322 Posted : Tuesday, December 27, 2011 4:37:44 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
M wrote:
Greetings My Brother, I hope your Day of Rest is peaceful. Here in Colorado we had a dump of snow and now the sun is shinning and all is really beautiful (as always).

I am on page 415 of ITG so please excuse if my question is answered further on in your work. But I was thinking of the information you sent me regarding the definition of "Garah", as garah is to "initiate conflict, to provoke, to contend, to meddle, to stir up strife, to be hostile, and to actively resist." It is even defined as "waging war while aggressively and excitedly attacking a foe."

I was wondering if you have ever used the above information in connection the verse at Shemoth 15:3, if no this maybe an avenue that can be developed whenever you have some time, as anything that illuminates our Father's personality for us to imitate is worthy of our knowing.

Of course the manner of our engagement is from an elevated form of expression as it would befit Son's of The Creator of the entire universe, I do not intend to roll in the mud with Human Secularists and Christian's etc. Really I am content to let those who do not wish to be enlightened to remain ignorant, you can lead a horse to water....

Warmest Regards,

M


Yada wrote:
M,

In Shemoth 15.3, the Yisra'elites were singing to Yahowah. It does not record God speaking to us. And the context which prompted this song is that Yah had just personally intervened to save His children from certain death at the hands of pharaoh's army, which was perusing them. So from their perspective, the one who had just vanquished the most mighty and powerful army was an 'iysh milhamah - a man of war, of battle.

From our perspective, the statement could be interpreted as "Yahowah 'iysh milhamah: Yahowah is the individual who draws the line, who engages in the battle, and who successfully defends."

The Towrah, Prophets, and Psalms show Yahowah consistently opposing the empowered, whether they be religious or political. And those who assist Him are saba': a spiritual army. So I see all of this meshing very nicely with garah. God not only hates religion, He is its foe. He mostly wields words, however, because they are the most effective weapon. But He has, and soon will, use far less forgiving means.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#323 Posted : Tuesday, December 27, 2011 8:43:31 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
Originally Posted by: J& Go to Quoted Post
Hi Yada,

I hope you don't mind me emailing you directly. My husband (whom I have copied on this email) and I have just recently been given your book to read. We have printed it and are in the process of working through it.

We are trying to decide which are the best resources to purchase to assist us in verifying what you are saying, and were hoping that you could point us in the right direction. I have looked at the list of resources that you listed, and although we would love to purchase them all, we just don't have the financial resources to do that.

I was thinking that perhaps the Dead Seas Scrolls Bible would be a good place to start? Also, as it is becoming evident that we are going to need to learn to speak Hebrew sooner rather than later, I did an internet search and came across a Biblical Hebrew pack which is formerly from Davka but is now distributed by Hebrew World. It apparently includes everything you need to master reading, writing, analyzing, and translating Biblical Hebrew. It's got audio pronunciation, Hebrew text and English translation of the complete Bible, a 1000 word vocabulary, 150 hours teaching, 200 exercises, 28 lessons.
Do you by any chance know of a better tool for us to order and begin learning?

Again, my apologies for taking the liberty of emailing you, but it seemed prudent to go to the source :)

Kind Regards,
J&H


Yada wrote:
J&H,

While I have written six books, since you mention Hebrew and the Dead Sea Scrolls, I'm assuming that you were given either Yada Yahweh (which is comprised of 7 volumes) or the Introduction to God (where only the first five of seven volumes are complete). But since neither of them have been published, they unlike In the Company, Tea with Terrorists, and Prophet of Doom would be difficult to "give." Yada Yahweh (http://yadayahweh.com/Yada_Yahweh_Genesis.YHWH), like Questioning Paul (http://questioningpaul.com/Questioning_Paul-Galatians-00-Letter_to_the_Reader.Paul), is only available online in HTML and PDF from the websites, with both versions being free and complete therein. And my most current book, An Introduction to God, is not yet posted online and thus is circulating exclusively as a Word document via email attachments.

The opening chapters of both Yada Yahweh and the Introduction to God list all of the resources I use to translate, and that are available to you for verification and additional edification. And what I suggest for those on a limited budget is to use one of the many free online resources which provide an interlinear and lexicon. I'd prefer not to endorse any of them because most of these sites are religious and they convey a great deal of misinformation along with access to some useful tools. (Some of my friends use http://biblos.com/ or http://www.e-sword.net/.)

And speaking of tools, the most useful is Logos software (http://www.logos.com/basepackages or http://www.logos.com/comparison). The Original Languages version costs around $350, but is worth every penny. It provides multiple interlinears and lexicons and they are all interconnected electronically which leverages your study time.

The DSS without lexicons and interlinears isn't of much value. The translation is no better than others. It only serves to identify the words which differ from the Masoretic.

Speaking Hebrew isn't necessary. Understanding written Hebrew is necessary. So that is where the interlinears and lexicons come into play. They connect and define the words so that you come to know and understand what they mean. Also, modern Hebrew, and thus spoken Hebrew, is a religious corruption of the language in which the Towrah was scribed. So it can lead you astray.

I've attached the most current draft of the Introduction to God because it strives to equip you to translate and understand Yahowah's testimony on your own. I like to think of the ITG as a toolbox. As you read it, look up some of the words, especially those you question, along the way using the free online lexicons and see if you don't concur.

If you and you come to enjoy the process of coming to understand Yah's Towrah teaching to the point that it is the defining priority of your marriage, then in addition to being blessed beyond comprehension, the investment required for Logos will seem quite small. So I hope that after reading the ITG that you will acquire this tool.

Very few husbands and wives study Yahowah's Word together in the way you have undertaken. If you stay with it you will be rewarded.

I offer a daily internet radio program at http://radio.yadayahweh.com/ M-F starting at 11.00 am est to 12.30. And if that time is not convenient, you can listen to the archives. During the show we discuss the news and present the ITG. Also, in addition to a lively chat room for the show, there is a Forum on the Yada Yah site which you might find helpful (http://forum.yadayahweh.com/). It too is free.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#324 Posted : Tuesday, December 27, 2011 11:38:55 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
Originally Posted by: J& Go to Quoted Post
Good evening Yada,

Please accept my apologies. It was remiss of me not to mention which book of yours we were studying.

A week ago I was emailed a copy of Introduction to God in word format by Koos du Plessis's son, whom I work with. Koos & I have been in contact for a while as our beliefs are very similar, and it was just a fortunate coincidence that his son and I ended up working together.

I appreciate you taking the time to reply in such detail; I am sure that you must get a lot of correspondence regarding your work.

Thank you for the advice. We will definitely get the original language version of Logos software and I will check out the radio broadcasts and the blog.


Yada wrote:
J&H,

That is good to know. I was curious as to why you didn't use the Contact Us feature that most use on the YadaYah.com or ProphetOfDoom.net websites. I seldom see letters pertaining to my books in my personal email. So that is the reason I was fishing for answers.

The version of the ITG I sent you is probably three months newer than the one Koos may have provided. In fact, you may want to send him a copy.

Koos has done a marvelous job reaching out to folks in South Africa - especially in the Hebrew Roots community. I came to know him through Prophet of Doom and then Yada Yahweh. We almost lost our relationship over Questioning Paul, but now Koos and I are on the same page again. I always enjoy reading his emails. He does such a wonderful job, I'm of the opinion that heaven will be filled with South Africans.

Most of the archive listeners to the internet radio program live in either South Africa, New Zealand, or Australia, with some residing in Europe. But other than missing the chat room, and enduring a little too much emphasis on America in the news, the archives will be worth a listen. I go into much greater detail in the show than I do in the book.

If you buy Logos then I'd recommend participating in the YadaYah.com Forum. James, who is the moderator of the Forum, is always willing to help get new users started with Logos. He has the Original Languages version and uses it most every day. I've cc'd him on this email so that if you seek out his help he will recognize you.

Please stay in touch. And as you read the ITG, please share your criticisms. Most of what I write is the product of many who know and love Yahowah.

The very fact that you are able to read the ITG, and that you are willing to question the translations, says a great deal about you. If you were religious you would not be able to do either. And apart from genuinely wanting to know Yah, no one could endure the scope or content of the book. So, based upon what I know, I'm confident that you will come to love Yah's Towrah and will embrace His Covenant - especially after you consider the 119th Psalm.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#325 Posted : Monday, January 2, 2012 3:03:07 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
Jim wrote:
Yada - I appreciate your patience today with my never ending question/confusion about Dowd. I guess what I was trying to ask was: Does the type of life that Dowd lived await the rest of us? Is it inevitable that we're all going to live out the balance of our days left like schmucks? Can not the Towrah help and guide us to a truer path or must we resign ourselves to our animal/base natures?

The words that Dowd (or whoever actually penned the 119th Psalm) are just so magnificient. Surely they must have helped to correct, even avoid rotten behavior. Do actions, in fact, speak louder than words?

It's a fascinating question and one which I continue to wrestle with. If it were any other person than Dowd. Above all other men, he should've known better.

Thanks again for letting me sit-in on the show today.

-Jim


Yada wrote:
Jim,

Dowd's focus was on the aspects of the Towrah which enable us to know Yah, to engage in a relationship with Yah, and to be saved by Yah. He studied Yah's testimony on these things. He came to understand them, he embraced them, he accepted them, and he trusted and relied upon them. So his relationship with God was close and his salvation was assured. That was Dowd's priority.

Dowd could have instead, or also, paid attention to the Towrah's guidance on how to live our earthly lives, but there is no indication he did. So his material life was not guided by God while his spiritual life was. And the contrasting results are enlightening.

Dowd's material choices were his own, and he experienced the rewards and consequences of having chosen both well and poorly. We all have freewill, and it applies to both the material and spiritual.

There are many things I love about Dowd. First among them is that he taught us how to observe the Towrah and respond to Yah. Second, his life demonstrates that we don't have to be perfect in our earthly lives to be seen as perfect by God. That means that Yah's Towrah guidance regarding relationship and salvation is designed for flawed people and it does not require us to do everything the Towrah says to be saved. Therefore, the Towrah liberates us rather than condemning us. If Dowd had been perfect in his mortal life, as was Yahowsha', we would not have this assurance. So by considering the contrast between the consequence of Dowd's material and spiritual choices we are confronted with the Towrah's most compelling truth. Salvation is God's work.

If you could manifest the Towrah perfectly in your earthly life you would be like Yahowsha'. But since you and I aren't capable of this, based upon Dowd's example, we have an assurance that our salvation doesn't require us being perfect, but instead Yah being prefect.

As for me, I celebrate Dowd's example because of what it reveals. We do not have the burden of having to earn our adoption or salvation. And neither is taken from us when we stumble.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#326 Posted : Monday, January 2, 2012 10:59:51 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
B wrote:
All I can say is WOW, after reading all of YY, took about a week, I'm amazed and inspired, and thankful to Father Yah, and thanks to you for so much time spent in the
service of Our Heavenly Father to reveal the truth about the Word.

I have been a "truth seeker" for many years, and never really belonged to any "church",
or denomination, at least since I was very young.

Although I've been searching so long to find God (truth), and the "True church of God",
and to no avail, I've come to the conclusion that no "True Chuch of God", exsits, at least
in the physical sense.

My summation was: how can there be so many different "religions" all in disagreement,
there must be at least one, that is correct and true, but not so.

I got started in the 80's with "The Plain Truth" magazine, and read most of
HW Armstrongs writings, and found some truths about the true Sabbath (Saturday),
and the Feasts and Towrah, but something else was missing, and I knew it.

I have always wondered why God didn't have a real name, and everybody else did.
Anybody with inellect above a rock should realize the names of God used in Scripture are
not names, but titles.

That, plus the number of times I've seen, "In My name", etc. in the Word, as these
jumped out at me alot, I think because Yah was trying to "wake me up".

I have always suspected that the truths were in the Towrah and assosiated with His
chosen people. (The Keys as I have called them)

So I started searching the Net for "His Name", and have hit many Sacred Names sites
and movements, read alot of them too.

Have read alot on the net about end times, Two House, Two Sticks, 2 Witnesses etc.

And just got a new "Book" called "The Word of Yahweh", Just a KJV with sacred names.

Then I stumbled on your site, YY, and wish I'd have found it first, could have saved the 50 bucks spent on the book. (At least it doesn't have the "other" bad names in it)

I will read all of YY again, as I don't retain things to well anymore, mostly concepts.

And could you please send me "Intro to God", as I can't find it anywhere else?
Is it in PDF Yet? (If not I'll figure out how to convert it)

Sorry for the "long winded" letter.

May Yahowah continue to bless you,

Thanks,
B


Yada wrote:
Hello B,

I have attached the Introduction to God. As soon as I'm finished with it I intend to edit YY based upon what I have learned. It is currently a Word document featuring five of what will be seven topics. The primary changes are all highlighted in the ITG, including a more accurate rendering of Yahowah, Yahowsha', and Ma'aseyah, in addition to the recognition that Paul was a false prophet and that the Covenant has not yet been renewed. I think you will enjoy it. The only thing it currently lacks are found in the Miqra'ey and Ga'al volumes of YY, both of which you have read. But you will have to convert it yourself to PDF.

I am pleased to hear that you are continuing to seek Yahowah, and that you recognize that religion is wrong. I am particularly supportive of your realization that God must have a name, one that is important for us to know.

If time permits, please join us M-F at 11.00 am for Yada Yah radio. We are discussing the ITG.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#327 Posted : Monday, January 2, 2012 11:02:51 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
D wrote:

Hello,

I'm looking over and reading much of the information you have on Yada Yahweh, The Owner's Manual and the other related pages you have links to. On the page about Questioning Paul you mention that you did a comprehensive review I had previously completed of Colossians. I'm wondering if you have that work available to read/download as well?

Thanks & Shalom,
D


Yada wrote:
D,

You are going to have to hurry to read what I would now consider to be an errant presentation of Colossians. It is currently found in the Skia chapter of the Called-Out volume of Yada Yahweh. At the time I wrote it I was unaware that Paul was a false prophet and did all I could do to interpret his writings in the most favorable manner. But after studying Galatians it became obvious that Paul was a fraud who should not be trusted. So, as soon as I've completed my current book, an Introduction to God, I'm going to edit Yada Yahweh and remove all references to Paul and the Renewed Covenant.

A friend of mine wrote The Owner's Manual.

I have attached the ITG.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#328 Posted : Monday, January 2, 2012 11:05:36 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
S wrote:
Hi Yada...
I was doing some research on "Melchizedek" this evening. I came across an interesting blurb on Wikipedia (see below).
Just this small blurb confirms a separation of His People who are covered and reconciled from those who are judged.
The issue I was looking for some clarity on is where Melchizedek is mentioned in Gen 14...
Gen 14:18

And Malkitseḏeq sovereign of Shalĕm brought out bread and wine. Now he was the priest of the Most High Ěl.
Gen 14:19

And he blessed him and said, "Blessed be Aḇram of the Most High Ěl, Possessor of the heavens and earth.
Gen 14:20

"And blessed be the Most High Ěl who has delivered your enemies into your hand." And he gave him a tenth of all.
Are these verses found in the DSS ? Would you take a moment and share your insights on Malchizedek and or point me to a section of YY where you address Malchizedek? What might you say to someone who is claiming that there is a current "Priesthood" in the order of Malchizedek under Towrah and the tithe is still in effect and should be given to those called to "full time ministry"? I'm kind of dealing with this person and I need to be better informed... their view on this just smells like peh'resh to me.

Thanks! Yah Bless!

S


Dead Sea Scrolls
[edit] 11Q13

11Q13 (11QMelch) is a fragment (that can be dated to the end of the 2nd or start of the 1st century BC) of a text about Melchizedek found in Cave 11 at Qumran in the Israeli Dead Sea area and which comprises part of the Dead Sea Scrolls. In this eschatological text, Melchizedek is seen as a divine being and Hebrew titles as Elohim are applied to him. According to this text Melchizedek will proclaim the "Day of Atonement" and he will atone for the people who are predestined to him. He also will judge the peoples.


Yada wrote:
S,

I don't have much to say about Malchizedek because we know almost nothing about him. Therefore, someone who is claiming to represent him has no basis for doing so. There is no Malchizedek text of any kind. So he was nothing more than an individual who is said to have known and served God. The DSS aren't helpful here.

There is no rational reason for anyone to claim to follow the unknown when Yahowah makes Himself known in the Towrah.

The "tithe" is only for Lowy, "Levites," as they serve to teach the Towrah. And it does not include money. There are no known Lowy and those who teach the Towrah accurately don't ask for financial support.

Based upon what you have revealed, the person soliciting your support is a fraud.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#329 Posted : Tuesday, January 10, 2012 3:04:39 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
S wrote:
Hi Yada Yahweh

My name is S i have been born in a Hindu background i am at this time doing
research on religion and because i am religious
all i want to know is which religious scriptures in the past and present are active in the world today?
People in this world who prayer to get there prayers heard from one supreme
being whom is above all and people prayer to religious men, idols, ect to mediate to
that one supreme being for there prayers to be heard and action ed on?

People prayer for peace, success, fortune, healing, protection, spiritual peace etc..?
In my past religion the religious men said to me all religions lead to one supreme being?

How can this be when some religions say you cant eat beef another says you cant eat pork
and others say pray in this direction other say in that direction, some say cover your hair
others say don't cover your hair so how can all ways lead to that one supreme being?
Wouldn't the one supreme being want one way only because he may not like the other ways?

All religious scriptures are to be inspired and given from one supreme being or
other supernatural forces and that all sacred scriptures that have been given or written by humans
and past down from generation to generation should have proof what they say and what
they are dong in this past and present world and that they make us belief in these sacred scriptures are true?

Its evident and statistically proof to me that Christainty prayers are heard more than
any other religion?

I did this table of contents which i found facts that the verses of the Holy bible
have happened in the past and are happening in the world today?

I would like your views on this work i am doing?

Thank you very much i await your reply
<See attached>


Yada wrote:
S

All religions are wrong. Don't trust any of them. God, whose name is Yahowah, hates religion.

Yahowah told us how to determine if someone was speaking for Him or just pretending to do so. If you use His criterion, found in Dabarym 18, you will be limited to considering the Towrah, Prophets, and Psalms as the full extent of Scripture.

I have attached my current book, An Introduction to God, to help you better understand who Yahowah is and what He is offering.

Yada
File Attachment(s):
Doc.zip (483kb) downloaded 35 time(s).
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#330 Posted : Tuesday, January 10, 2012 3:07:59 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
R wrote:
Hi Yada,
Thanks for sending a copy of the ITD. Most helpful.
I'm having some difficulty with the concept of the Set-apart Spirit covering us in a garment of light. It seems to me that once we have made a decision to get to know, understand and hence wish to be with Yah, then using the mechanism you have so ably stated in your broadcasts our sins are forgiven and we become like God. The word 'covering' suggests we have an inner core of sin that is simply covered over to prevent Yah from seeing it but nevertheless remains wtih us for all eternity. Maybe a better concept is that once that our neshamah has made the decision to be with Yah and we have acted accordingly, and we are saved, then our sins are not merely covered over but vanish in the same way that an unrepentant soul vanishes after judgment, never to be seen, heard from or considered again (except of course for those who end in the abyss). If this is so, then the only part of our nephesh/neshama that remains is the decision to form a relationship with Yah and then when we are given our new (energy only) bodies the torah is written in together with that remaining part of our nephesh/neshama. It's a bit like an up-dated computer programme.
Another issue I have is with stoning. I'm still considering it and for now I can't really go further except to say that if is barbaric for an islamist it must also be for everyone else - including scripture. There must be another way of looking at it.
Kind regards,
R


Yada wrote:
R,

When you are covered in light, in the presence of light, there is no darkness. Light eliminates darkness. So, in the presence of light the darkness no longer remains.

The "covering" and "garment" metaphors are Yah's, but so is light. Collectively they do not hide, but instead replace.

That said, no metaphor, or combination thereof, is perfect, even when conceived by Yah. They are simply pictures to help us understand.

I hope this helps.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#331 Posted : Tuesday, January 10, 2012 4:49:43 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
This is the same S as above.

S wrote:
Hi brother i am Christian but i have not been Baptist ed yet i want to share my testimony with you

My name is S i am new in Lord Jesus Christ. Born in uk my parents are of origins from India.
I never knew about God Almighty all i knew was to follow on want my family's belief which was Ravidassia Religion
and they have past down from generation to generation i also was i guess a Polytheism and when i
prayed to my past religions i had Lord Jesus Christ in my prayers as well
deep down i also knew that there is one creator and different ways to get to Him example
i thought Jesus Christ was a way for the western people and Mohammed was a way for Muslims
and for hindhu was a way with there idols and budda for Chinese and ect..

My testimony i was made redundant from my job on the 4-8-2009 and became angry and stressed and
i did thought all these things i pray to they are not helping and asked pray from my christian cousin
whom had turned to the Lord from our past religion and i heard and knew Lord Jesus heals as he my healed
my auntie from stomach cancer in the past but at that time for me it was hard to believe because
i was living in darkness which i did no know about.
On 19-2-2010 my cousins and her friends prayed for me and she gave me the Holy bible
to read and i read it within 77 days. As i read the bible lots of answers started coming to
me about life and i started watching God tv and testimony's of people of other religions moving to
Lord Jesus Christ and i started doing lots of research on the internet and listening to christian radio stations.
On the 23-9-2010 i had a dream i was walking with Lord Jesus Christ and entered like a kingdom or castle
which was dark inside and i turned to the right and seen Father God Almighty glowing in light sitting on His throne.
I don't know why i had this dream and the dream was silent i heard nothing.
There are so many details in the dream but i shortened it because you may not believe me.
And this verse came as i was doing bible research on the internet from new testament -
Luke 10:22 Turning to the disciples, he said, "All things have been delivered to me by my Father.
No one knows who the Son is, except the Father, and who the Father is, except the Son,
and he to whomever the Son desires to reveal him."

i hope you believe me and i feel i need to do some work for Father God Almighty because we have been predestined

and happy new year to you and your family keep in touch

May our Heavenly Father God Almighty and our brother Lord Yeshua Christ protect and bless you
Thank you S


Yada wrote:
S,

I make it a point to never respond to people's dreams - especially those inspired by religious individuals. They are all too often inspired by the wrong spirit. And speaking of wrong, I can tell you that "Lord, Jesus, Christ, and Holy Bible" are all errant. If you don't know and understand His name and titles, you don't know Him.

God's name is Yahowah. His set-apart and diminished corporeal manifestation is Yahowsha'. His title is Ma'aseyah. And His testimony can be found in the Towrah, Prophets, and Psalms. If you want to know Yahowah and understand how to form a relationship with Him study them and ignore your Christian friends and their religious programs. Stop dreaming and start observing.

There is not one Christian, Muslim, Hindu, or Socialist Secular Humanist on the planet who knows the Father or the Son. But you can know Him if you read the attached presentation of the Towrah.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#332 Posted : Wednesday, January 11, 2012 10:32:54 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
This is the same S as above.
S wrote:
yes brother i see your point but how many prophets in the bible had visions dreams and face to face accounts with God Almighty i cant stop having dreams because i am not in control of my mind and i am observing
whats written in the Holy scriptures and proving them with observing whats going on in the world today.
Don t you think Lord Jesus Christ is glorifying God Almighty in every culture?
I think you when you prayer to God Almighty you should ask Him one question that Why He is giving all His things and knowledge to Christians? and watch out for idol worshiping countries which God Almighty hate like
China India South Korea rising in power because of the rise in Christians?


Yada wrote:
You are not a prophet, so the comparison is not appropriate. And as a result, unlike Yahowah's prophets you use errant names and titles. There is no excuse for using "Lord, Jesus, Christ, Bible, or Christian" in association with God. They are all errant. If Yahowah were revealing something to you He would not use a false name.

Our "prayer" to Yahowah ought to be little more than listening to Him by reciting His Towrah and then responding to what He is offering. And observing is to be directed at His Towrah, not your dreams.

Yahowah has no relationship with any Christian. He does not know them and they do not know Him. You have been misled.

If you what to know and understand Yahowah's Word, Name, Teaching, Covenant, Instructions, Invitations, and Prophecy read the book I sent to you.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#333 Posted : Thursday, January 12, 2012 9:16:41 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
LR wrote:
I don't know if you didn't get this the first time or if something I said caused you to disregard it or what? My questions are sincere so I don't see that as a problem? So I am re-sending this in hopes of a response even if it is you saying you will not answer!

Hello Yada , I hope all is well with you and yours. I have more questions of course, but i wanted to let you know my granddaughter has started to read "Come Out of Her My People" with me and her son my great grandson who is 17, has been asking question about Torah now to.

Are we not to pray, but instead have conversation with Father?

I' am am asked "If Yahowshua didn't die for our sins, then why did he die? I have been saying he died because of our sin, to pay the penalty of death for us. Is that correct?

If Yahowah dose not know what we are thinking or even what we are doing then what dose 1 Hebrew 4: 12 mean?

And if he doesn't know these things then how dose he know when we have turned around and are following Torah?

And how do we know if he has adopted us?

And what about all the people who died before he came and those who never hear about Yahowah, Yahowshua sense then? To be fair and just I'd think he'd have to have some plan for them?

What about predestination needing to be called by the Father first? That we only have a chance of being " saved" if he first call's us, not if we turn to him?

Thank you very much.

LR


Yada wrote:
LR,

I receive more letters each day than I have time to answer and get anything else done is the only reason I did not respond.

Reading Come Out of Her My People can help someone start to question their religion, but isn't of any help beyond that. But at least it is a start. Until a person is willing to reject their religion there is no hope in coming to know our understand Yahowah. It is a prerequisite of the Covenant.

Our conversations with Yahowah should be based upon reciting His Towrah so that we listen to Him, come to know Him and understand Him, and then we should respond to what He is offering. Nothing more is required. Christian prayers are never heard as they provide a laundry list of what the person wants their pretend god to do for them.

God cannot die. This misunderstanding is a derivative of the pagan roots of Christianity. Only the body of Yahowsha' died, which was meaningless matter, as it served as the Passover Lamb. His soul, which is His consciousness, and thus life, now separated from the Spirit, then fulfilled Unleavened Bread the following day. And that is how our sin was resolved. Then on FirstFruits His soul and Spirit were reunited in a new form which was unrecognizable, meaning that there was no "bodily resurrection." This is all presented and explained in the ITG which I've attached.

Hebrews isn't Scripture. It is anti-Scripture along with all of Paul's letters. Paul was wrong, as were his pals. Reject them.

The answer to your questions on how does He know, and how can we know, is presented in the review of the 119th Psalm in the ITG. Follow Dowd's example and you will be in fine shape.

If you want to understand Yahowah, you are going to have to stop focusing on Yahowsha'. The only way to understand Yahowsha' is through coming to know Yahowah via His Towrah.

Yahowah was known long, long before Yahowsha' arrived. Moreover, Yahowah does not care that billions of souls have died without coming to know Him. He only cares about those who have embraced His Towrah. He only cares about His family.

I explain the "fair" question in the ITG. God is fair, but not in a religious, all accommodating, loving everyone sense. He has only one plan. There are no exceptions. So, a person either observes the Towrah and comes to know Yahowah, and comes understand His Covenant, and then accepts its terms, or not. It is black and white, cut and dried. There is but one way to form a relationship with God and to be saved by Him.

There is no predestination, only freewill. God has invited all of us to meet with Him. Very few answer.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#334 Posted : Friday, January 13, 2012 1:52:41 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
R wrote:
Yada,

Going through your Introduction, I have a few questions as per attached.
I will be grateful to receive your views.

Regards, R


R wrote:
”An introduction to God” proves to contain a truly rich wealth of info from the Source of Life; and to be able to absorb info, I have to invest time in re-&-reading and cross-referencing or making extracts, so I didnot proceed beyond page 550 yet. In the process I didnot pick up Hebrew, be it that I start recognising some Hebrew words. I have a question from my ”quote&extract”-file:

Collectively then, azab and enkataleipo present the Spirit’s departure from Yahshua just prior to His last breath, leaving a man and his soul hanging on the precipice of death. What’s interesting is that now that the Set-Apart Spirit has returned to Yahweh, God has become plural again: ‘elohiym rather than ‘el. Also, deprived of the Spirit, the Messiyah no longer considers Himself Yahshua. Here (as I understand) you are saying that He hung there in our stead.
There would be no rest for Yahshua’s soul as it descended into the darkness of the pit-the one place God’s Spirit cannot go. This Pit, which is transformed into the Abyss, is the lightless home of the Adversary. Yahshua’s soul would suffer there, as His body had suffered on the upright pillar. With foreboding words, the then future and now past sacrificial soul pleads with Yahweh, asking Him not to abandon Him. He recognizes that He is headed to a rendezvous with Satan, the Adversary, where He will be afflicted. He knows that nothing exists that can protect Him from this tribulation. Here I understand His ”human soul” went beyond Sheol as the place of the death Psalm 16:10, and He entered into the abyss (or the Lake of Fire). Only Yahweh can spare us from Satan’s sting. He alone can be counted on to help in our hour of greatest need. And yet, Yahweh could not, and still cannot, go into Satan’s lair-as it is the place of separation. However, since separation from God is the penalty prescribed for sin, Yahshua’s soul would have to go there to redeem us. All God’s Spirit could do was open and close the door. Once inside, Yahshua would be on His own.
Question 1: Do I understand correctly that by entering the abyss, He did die for also the chief of sinners, provided this chief repents and finds the Path delineated in Lev.23 ??

Reading Mark16:1, then Luke23:56 and 24:1, then the sum total looks like Abyb14 and 16 being sabbaths, while on the 15th the shops were open, however my question concerns for what period of time Yahushua’s body was in the grave, before He emerged in a different than purely physical body.

Question 2: How do I read Psalm 16:10 in relation to His entering the Abyss; and in relation to the two (or three) days ”in the grave”. Also how does His time in the abyss relate to time in the grave ??
Question 3: My physician is dead against circumcision since I am 78 of age: do you hold any opinion?
Question 4: Since there is no physical resurrection, do you consider crematie = incineration of the body permissible??
Question 5: Are there many people in the Netherlands who contacted you ??

Thank you and regards, R


Yada wrote:
R,
God cannot, and thus did not, die. That is a pagan myth. Only Yahowhsa's body died as the Passover Lamb. And that only made us immortal.

It is Matsah, not Pesach, which addresses our sin. On Matsah, Yahowsha's soul, His consciousness/life, went to the place of separation, which is called she'owl. And it was there that the penalty of sin was resolved. The Abyss is a Greek term. And the Lake of Fire is nothing more than a metaphor for judgment.

Since it was Yahowsha's soul/consciousness which entered the place of separation/she'owl, He did not die. But by doing this for us, our penalty was paid, keeping our soul out of she'owl. That is the message of Matsa presented in Qara'/Leviticus 23 and explained in the Prophets.

To be the Passover Lamb, Yahowsha's body ceased to exist the evening following Pesach, or the evening of the 14th day, which had been the sixth day of the week (what we call Friday). The "body" He occupied on Bikuwrym was completely different in nature and appearance. In other words, His dead body was not resurrected.

As for the timing, He observed the Pesach meal at the beginning of Pesach, which is sunset on the 13th day (a Thursday evening in 33CE), and thus the beginning of the 14th day. He served as the Passover Lamb at the end of the 14th day, a Friday in 33CE, prior to sunset. That evening His body would have been evaporated in harmony with Yah's Passover instructions - thereby keeping the Set-Apart One from the pit/grave. His soul, thus life and consciousness, went to She'owl, the place of separation, immediately thereafter, fulfilling Matsah on the 15th day, a Shabat. Then before sunrise on the first day of the week, His soul and Spirit were reunited in a new body, one so unlike the old one that no one recognized Him. He walked through walls and teleported. Such will be the case with all of Yah's Covenant children one day.

This is completely consistent with the psalmist's soul not going to She'owl and with the Set-Apart One not going to the pit. That is the path to life. So I see only affirmation in Psalm 16.

Mark and Luke were not eyewitnesses and thus their accounting isn't always reliable. That said, their depiction relative to timing is consistent with what I've shared.

If you are not circumcised then you cannot benefit from Passover, and so your soul will die, you cannot engage in the Covenant, so you cannot participate in a relationship with Yahowah, and your soul cannot enter heaven. Abraham was 100 when he was circumcised. And I know three men all of whom were circumcised this year, all of whom were over 50. God is clear on this and there is no hint of compromise. So find a different doctor.

If you'd like to talk with these three men I'll introduce you to them. Two live in America and the other in New Zealand.

I exchange emails with people all around the world, with probably 20 or so living in the Netherlands over the past 10 years. Most of my correspondence with the Netherlands, however, has been over Prophet of Doom, not Yada Yahweh.

I've attached the most recent draft of the ITG.

I think this addressed all of your questions, but if not let me know.

Yada

Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#335 Posted : Friday, January 13, 2012 8:11:55 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
LR wrote:
Yada,
If the NT is so unreliable how dose one determine if any of the Gospel's are true and therefore if "Jesus" was the Real Son of God or made up to fit there purpose as seams to be true of the other writings in the NT? I understand that in Torah he is told of in many way's, yet those writing the NT would have known that too, so my question is how dose one PROVE Yahowsha/Jesus was the ONE?
I will start focusing on Torah NOW as you have advised and I have started to listen to your radio program as well, it is so helpful and also give me the opportunity to HEAR the sound of Hebrew words and names. What are you working on now if I may ask?

Thank you,
LR


Yada wrote:
LR,

It isn't "if." The NT is hopelessly unreliable. That is a fact. I'd encourage you to study this reality.

Gospel is a pagan term.

There are only two eyewitness accounts, and thus they have the highest likelihood of being accurate. But even they have been significantly corrupted over time, both by scribes and by translators.

You come to know Yahowsha' in the Towrah, Prophets, and Psalms. BUT why are YOU still focused on the Son rather than the Father? Come to know and understand Yahowah and then you will have no questions regarding Yahowsha'. But if you continue to focus on the Son you have no hope of understanding either.

Yahowah is the One. And He proves it. That is what Yahowsha' means.

I'm still writing and editing the Introduction to God. I attached the most current draft to the last email. It focuses on what God has asked you to focus upon.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline Daniel  
#336 Posted : Sunday, January 15, 2012 3:58:00 AM(UTC)
Daniel
Joined: 10/24/2010(UTC)
Posts: 694
Location: Florida

Yada wrote:
if you continue to focus on the Son you have no hope of understanding either.



Well said.
Nehemiah wrote:
"We carried our weapons with us at all times, even when we went for water" Nehemiah 4:23b

We would do well to follow Nehemiah's example! http://OurSafeHome.net
Offline James  
#337 Posted : Thursday, January 19, 2012 11:01:35 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
L wrote:
How accurate would you say that this statement is ? When I see the Latin Vulgate being called ancient I find it ridiculous. There are six manuscript "families" of Hebrew scripture manuscripts. The Greek Old Testament (called the Septuagint, or LXX) was used by early Gentile Christians, which is available in fragmentary form, is supplemented by the so-called later "Daughter Translations" into other languages. The Dead Sea Scrolls include both canonical and apocryphal texts. The earliest extant manuscript of the Masoretic Text (begun after the destruction of the Second Temple in 70CE) dates from about the year 1000 CE. Finally, there are ancient versions of the Jewish scriptures (the Hebrew Targums, Peshitta, and the Latin Vulgate) and the Samaritan Pentateuch. Scripture scholars employ all of these in order to arrive at scholarly translations and scholarly commentaries from among their differences. However, there is no one single universally recognized manuscript of the Hebrew scriptures. In other words, there is no single "correct" manuscript.

Thanks I see this as a trash L


Yada wrote:
L,

There are only two known families of Hebrew Scripture, those from Yahuwdah and those brought back from Babylon with the rabbis. The MT is from the Babylonian family and it dates to 1000CE not 70CE. The DSS are of the Yahuwdah family and date between 200BCE and 70CE.

The Septuagint is nothing more than a Greek translation of the Yahuwdah family of Hebrew Scriptures from 200BCE to 200CE. The Samarian Pentateuch is an Aramaic translation, but of what we do not know for sure. Since the oldest extant copy dates to the 6th century CE, it could have translated from Hebrew, Greek, or Latin into Aramaic, but was probably from the Targums, a rabbinical paraphrase of the Babylonian family of Hebrew Scriptures in Aramaic circa 100BCE to 500CE.

The Latin Vulgate dates to just prior to 400 CE. It is the result of blending conflicting Old Latin texts and translating the Septuagint.

The oldest extant witnesses to the text of the Hebrew Scriptures are the Dead Sea Scrolls. Nothing else even comes close.

I hope this helps.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#338 Posted : Monday, February 20, 2012 3:12:22 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
I loved this exchange. The person claims to love the work that Yada has done at YY, but if you read what she wrote it sounds like she has never even read a sentence of it.

PU wrote:
Greetings!!!

First, I would like to thank you for your amazing contribution to the body of Christ. It has enriched my life in ways that I cannot even begin to explain. Even an attempt would take an eternity. So, thank you for the time and dedication and for the obedience to the will of God.

Second, I would like to donate to your work. It is on my heart to give you support. I do not have much but I am compelled to help fund your work so that your website and writings can remain published on the internet. So, please tell me how I would donate and where I can send a check.

Again thank you and God bless!


Yada wrote:
There is "no body of Christ." His body, other than to fulfill Pesach as the perfect lamb, was irrelevant. It ceased to exist the very night He fulfilled Passover. And "Christ" is wrong in every possible way. His title is Ma'aseyah. It means the "Work of Yahowah." The notion of a "body of Christ" comes from Paul's letters, and Paul was a false prophet.

I have attached the Introduction to God which presents the seven topics most important to Yahowah: His Word, His Name, His Teaching, His Covenant, His Terms, His Invitations, and His Way.

I appreciate your offer of financial support but we do not accept contributions. The notion of making monetary donations is Pauline, and thus errant. Yahowah's Word is free.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#339 Posted : Wednesday, February 22, 2012 3:21:00 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
CGW wrote:
Dear Mr. Winn:

I have been studying islam for nine years; I have read Prophet of Doom and perused your POD website. First, allow me to thank you for writing such a gloriously thorough and well-researched expose of islam. Although I already knew much of what you compiled in your voluminous study, there exists no other such exhaustive compilation of analysis and fact with regard to the evil ideology in all of history. Surely you have been guided and blessed to be able to contribute such a magnificent Master Work to the world.

I have only begun to peruse your Yada Yahweh site, but before I go further, I felt compelled to ask you your opinion on a very basic matter. (Should you deign to present any substantiation for your opinion, I would be most grateful. However, I do not presume to trouble you with such a request.)

Do you believe that, in the final analysis, Good will triumph over Evil?

Personally, I have a degree of Faith that it will, but some days the burden of knowledge of islam and the danger it poses to the World and the souls of men is almost too heavy to bear. I admit to feeling discouraged at times, although I will never surrender.

Thank you for your work.

Regards,

CGW


Yada wrote:
CGW,

Thank you for the encouraging words. It means a lot when someone like you who has invested the time to learn about Islam is so appreciative of the work of another. I invested 10,000 hours in the project. I wanted to rearrange all five early sources so that they told the complete story from beginning to end. That was no easy task.

I indeed had help. Yahowah asked me to engage in this mission. Fortunately, my role in that job is now complete. There are much more rewarding ways to invest one's time.

I've attached my current book with is not yet completed and thus not yet posted online. But since the Introduction to God corrects many of the errors I made in YY, it will give you something to read while I edit YY. For example, I had nearly completed YY before I learned that Paul was a false prophet, before I learned that the Covenant has not yet been renewed, and before I learned that the most important names and titles are Yahowah, Yahowsha', and Ma'aseyah.

So while there is a great deal of good material in the first 4 volumes of YY, the ITG is much more enlightening.

Yes, Yahowah will intervene in the nest 22 years and totally remove all evil from the earth. We will return to the conditions experienced in the Garden of Eden beginning on Sukah in Year 6000 Yah (2033).

Islam is satanic, but I don't see it as mankind's most lethal foe. There are others which are even more pervasive, deceitful, destructive, and damning.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#340 Posted : Tuesday, February 28, 2012 4:28:47 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
Dowd wrote:
Hi Yada,

I had the misfortune to strike up a conversation with a casual acquaintance this morning. He greeted me in the name of 'Jesus' which led to my polite reply that no such person ever lived and that His name is Yahowsha' and that He was the diminished human manifestation of Yahowah, set-apart from Him to fulfil the Towrah Miqra'ey of Pesach, Matsah and Bikuwrym as the Perfect Passover Lamb in 33 CE.

Rather than rationally evaluate what had just been revealed to him, he ignored it and, not pausing for breath, moved on to his next challenge. "Who do you fellowship with!!?" I told him that I observe the Sabbath and Yah's promise of Seven with my family, reading and reciting Yah's Word. He ignored this, failing to understand the message and steered the conversation to his 'Paul.'

When confronted with proof of Sha'uwl's malfeasance he ignored the evidence and proceeded to slander Moshe! He passionately made the case that if 'Paul' was a false prophet, then the same must be said for 'Moses'. If the 'new testament' isn't the inspired word of his god, then neither is the Towrah! As my Dad always said, "If he had half a brain, it'd be lonely!"

There is no reasoning with christian morons. It is pointless to waste breath on them. This shop is a useful thoroughfare between the rear car park and the main street so I will no doubt see him again because he is a shop assistant there. There are four employees and all are 'christians.' If he raises his religion with me, I will politely refuse to engage.

It is a very unpopular path we are on. We are universally rejected and despised for revealing Yahowah's Towrah but the fact remains, we are members of His family and that is more than enough for this flawed child of Yah!

HalaluYah!!

Dowd


Yada wrote:
Dowd,

Ummm, ahhhh, duhhh, I must be missing something. Where is the evidence and what is the logic to support: If the 'new testament' isn't the inspired word of his god, then neither is the Towrah?

If the Towrah isn't the Word of God then Paul's letters cannot be the Word of God because Paul says otherwise in his misquotations of it. And if the Towrah is the Word of God then Paul's letters cannot be the Word of God because they contradict the Towrah.

But that must be too obvious for your Christian acquaintance. Religion and reason don't mix. Just as the religious and Godly have nothing in common. As for me, I have chosen Yah. Christians can have Paul all to themselves.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#341 Posted : Thursday, March 1, 2012 3:01:06 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
W wrote:
As a Baptist pastor in NC, I wanted to thank you and your website for offering phenomenal Hebrew etymology as I prepare for the lectionary Old Testament text this coming Sunday, Gen. 17:1-7, 15-16. I am looking at the word for covenant: "beriyth." How fascinating it is to understand that word in the context of "home" and "head." By just adding the "r" to the word "bayith" it shows that the covenant is God-initiated because he is the head of the house, the owner and leader in our hearts! I have found this link:

http://yadayahweh.com/Ya...weh_Genesis_Beriyth.YHWH

Thank you so very much for providing such great background to the Hebrew text and for allowing me to share these findings about "covenant" with the congregation on Sunday. May God bless your ministry and your work in helping others understand the Hebrew scriptures more fully. I will quote a section of that page and will give its source so that others will know where I got it. God bless you!

--
Rev. W
"Be bold before men. Be broken before God."
<><
John 3:30
"εκεινον δει αυξανειν εμε δε ελαττουσθαι."

"Lord, help me preach like it's the last sermon I'll ever give...Amen." (<--my prayer I often give to Jesus on Sundays)

1. The future of Christianity is the church.
2. The future of the church is the kingdom of God.
--(Jürgen Moltmann, Sun of Righteousness, Arise! God’s Future for Humanity and the Earth [Fortress Press, 2010]).

When one of Charles Spurgeon’s students proudly stepped up to preach, but came back down having failed miserably, Spurgeon supposedly said something like, ‘If you’d gone up the way you came down, you’d have come down the way you went up.’


Yada wrote:
Sorry, W, but you ought not be a Christian or congregate on Sundays. And there is no "Old Testament," just as there is no "New Testament." There is only one Covenant and it has not yet been renewed. And when it is renewed, the basis of that affirmation will come in the form of Yahowah placing His Towrah inside of us. That is the message of the Hebrew Scriptures.

Yahowah is not a Baptist. God is opposed to all religions. Yahowah hates being called "Lord." God does not have a "church." He is not "Christian." In fact, there will be no Christians in the Kingdom of Yahowah. In fact, Paul, the founder of Christianity, was a false prophet. (read www.QuestioningPaul.com)

Yahowah cannot be known apart from His Towrah. The terms and conditions of the beryth - family-oriented covenant relationship are presented in the Towrah and nowhere else. It is thus impossible to engage in a relationship with Yahowah apart from His Towrah. And without the Covenant, there is no salvation. Moreover, the only place Yahowah explains the means to reconciliation, and thus to salvation is in His Towrah. And that is why the Ma'aseyah Yahowsha' was the living embodiment of the Towrah and was Towrah observant. It is why He upheld the promise of Passover, Unleavened Bread, and FirstFruits.

As for the Covenant, there are five terms and conditions which must be accepted for anyone to engage in a relationship with Yahowah. I would be surprised if one in a million Christians knows any one of them. So if you want to preach on the Covenant, I'd suggest focusing first on the Towrah and reading what Yahowah had to say to Abram. (This is presented in the Covenant section of the attached ITG.) It is the only way to be invited into Yah's home.

This morning on my internet radio program we were considering Yahowah's hostility toward religion as He revealed it through His prophet Yirmayahuw / Jeremiah.

“The learned sages and wise men (chakam – the religious interpreters who claim to understand) completely shame and humiliate themselves (bowsh – should be totally ashamed, and in an appropriate time they will suffer emotional anguish as a result of their serious sin against society (hiphil perfect)). They have been caught (lakad – they have made their choice, they have clung together, and they have been immovable, and as a result these rulers have ensnared themselves as they have been caught providing mistaken information (niphal imperfect waw consecutive)), and (wa) they will be cast down for having done this dreadful and horrible thing (chathath – they will be terrified and broken for having instilled fear, they will be frightened and abolished for having terrorized others, they will become confused and will be dismayed for this abomination (qal perfect)).

They have completely rejected (ma’as – they have totally avoided, despised, spurned, and refused to accept (qal perfect)) an association with (ba) the Word (dabar) of Yahowah (efei - hwhy- יהוה). And so (wa) regarding the wisdom of their instructions (chakamah – their administrative prowess, their shrewdness in religious affairs, their skillfulness in military endeavors, and their teaching), of what value is it to them (la mah – what is the point)?” (Yirmayahuw / Rise Up to Yah / Jeremiah 8:9)

“Indeed (ky), from (min) the least significant (qatan) and up to (wa ‘ad) the greatest and most important (gadowl – the highest ranking and most influential), all (kol) will be cut off (basa’) for having dishonestly solicited ill-gotten gain (besa’ – for having used deception to take advantage of others and satiate their greed for material wealth, plundering their victims). From (min) the prophet (naby’ – those who claim to be inspired and speak for God [read: Paul, Akiba, and Muhammad]) and including (wa ‘ad) the priest, cleric, and minister (kohen – the priesthood [read: pastors and popes]), every one of them (kol – all of them without exception) engage in and promote (‘asah – perform and profit from) useless deceptions and communicate lies (sheqer – egotistic vanity and utter futility while articulating that which is misleading and false, and are as a result complete frauds).” (Yirmayahuw / Rise Up to Yah / Jeremiah 8:10)

“So (wa) Yahowah (efei - hwhy- יהוה) says (‘amar – promises and declares), ‘This is because (‘al – on behalf of the fact that) they have abandoned and forsaken (‘azab – they have rejected and disassociated themselves from) My Towrah (Towrah – My Torah Instruction and Teaching, My Source of Guidance and Direction; derived from: tow – My signed, written, and enduring, towrah – way of treating people, tuwr – giving you the means to explore, to seek, to find, and to choose, yarah – the source of instruction, teaching, guidance, and direction that flows from Me, which tuwb – provides answers to facilitate your restoration and return, even your response and reply to that which is towb – good, pleasing, beneficial, favorable, healing, and right, and that which causes you to be loved, to become acceptable, and to endure, tahowr and tohorah – purifying and cleansing you, thereby towr – providing you with the opportunity to change your attitude, thinking, and direction) which as a result of the relationship (‘asher – as a favor and blessing) I gave to you, placing it before you (natan la paneh). Moreover (wa) you have not listened to (lo’ shama’ – you have not used your sense of hearing to receive) My voice (qowl). And you do not walk (wa lo’ halak) in it (ba – in association with her [speaking of the Towrah which is a feminine noun]).” (Yirmayahuw / Rise Up to Yah / Jeremiah 9:12)

“Rather (wa), they continually walked (halak – they journeyed on a path through life (qal imperfect waw consecutive)) following (‘achar – and retreating back after) the stubbornness and adversarial nature (sharyruwth – the hardness which represents a reluctance to change; from sharar – the antagonistic nature) of their hearts and attitudes (leb – of their emotions and ambitions) while also (wa) following after (‘achar) the Lord (ha Ba’al – the one whose ambition it is to rule over, possess, control, and own, and serving as Satan’s title throughout Scripture), which (‘asher) they learned (lamad – they were trained and taught, instructed and directed) by their fathers (‘ab).” (Yirmayahuw / Rise Up to Yah / Jeremiah 9:13)

“So likewise therefore as a result (la ken) this is what (koh) Yahowah of the spiritual envoys (Yahowah saba’), the God of Yisra’el (‘elohy Yisra’el), says (‘amar – responds and answers), ‘Look here at Me and pay attention (hineh – behold (scribed in the first person singular)): these people consume (‘akal ‘eth ha ‘am – as these related individuals eat) this bitter and sickening substance (ha zeh la’anah – this toxic curse which afflicts), and (wa) I allow them to drink (shaqah) poisonous (ro’sh – harmful and deadly, embittering) waters (maym).” (Yirmayahuw / Rise Up to Yah / Jeremiah 9:14)

“And it shall come to be (wa hayah – and a time will exist) when indeed (ky) you will report (nagad – warn and advise, inform and tell) this (zeh) to (la) the people (‘am – related individuals and family), accompanied by (‘eth – with) all of (kol) these, the Almighty’s (ha ‘elah) words (dabarym – statements), and (wa) they ask you and God (‘amar ‘el – they respond, question, and say to you and to God), ‘What has Yahowah spoken concerning us, and why is the Word of Yahowah against us (mah dabar Yahowah ‘al), with (‘eth) all of (kol) this great (zeh gadowl – this large quantity of significant) misfortune and misery (ra’ah – disaster and destruction, calamity and suffering)? And what is our offense (wa mah chata’ah – how have we missed the way, forfeited our rights, and incurred such guilt)? Why are we to blame, and where did we miss the way (‘asher chata’ – which is our sin and where did we go wrong), concerning (la – to) Yahowah, our God (Yahowah ‘elohym)?’” (Yirmayahuw / Rise Up to Yah / Jeremiah 16:10)

“And then (wa) you shall answer for God and say unto them (‘amar ‘el ‘al – you shall respond for the Almighty and declare to them), ‘Relationally (‘asher) your fathers (‘ab) have completely and literally abandoned and rejected (‘azab – forsaken and disassociated from (qal perfect)) an association with Me (‘eth – accompanying Me),’ prophetically declares (na’um) Yahowah (efei - hwhy- יהוה), ‘and they have walked (wa halak) following after (‘achar) other and different (‘acher – additional) gods (‘elohym), and they have engaged with them and served them (wa ‘abad), and they have bowed down and worshipped them, prostrating themselves in allegiance to them (chawah la). And with regard to Me (wa ‘eth), they have completely and literally rejected and disassociated from (‘azab – actually abandoned and totally forsaken (qal perfect)) My Towrah (Towrah – My Torah Instruction and Teaching, My Source of Guidance and Direction; derived from: tow – My signed, written, and enduring, towrah – way of treating people, tuwr – giving you the means to explore, to seek, to find, and to choose, yarah – the source of instruction, teaching, guidance, and direction that flows from Me, which tuwb – provides answers to facilitate your restoration and return, even your response and reply to that which is towb – good, pleasing, beneficial, favorable, healing, and right, and that which causes you to be loved, to become acceptable, and to endure, tahowr and tohorah – purifying and cleansing you, thereby towr – providing you with the opportunity to change your attitude, thinking, and direction). They have not observed or considered it (wa lo’ shamar – and they have not examined, explored, or evaluated it).” (Yirmayahuw / Rise Up to Yah / Jeremiah 16:11)


I would encourage you to shamar - observe and consider the Towrah - Teaching of Yahowah and then share what you learn with others. I've attached the Introduction to God in hopes that you read it and share it with your congregation. But be forewarned: the lone prerequisite for participating in the beryth - covenant with Yahowah is walking away from Babel - from human religious, political, and societal corruptions.

I was once a Christian. One of my closest friends was Jerry Falwell. I was an ordained ruling elder and an evangelist. So I was once in your shoes. But the more I studied Yahowah's Word the more I came to realize that Christianity was Babylonian, not Scriptural. My hope for you and those who listen to you is that you embark on that same voyage of discovery. The Introduction with God will give you the tools to do this very thing. The truth about the relationship is so much better than the religious lie.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#342 Posted : Friday, March 2, 2012 4:46:52 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
M wrote:
Sir,
In An Introduction To God you wrote:
" This passage goes on to say of Heylel ben Shachar that: “You (‘atah),
yourself, said in your heart (ba leb – in your inner nature as a reflection of your
attitude and ambition), ‘I will unjustly ascend (‘alah – I, Allah, will wrongfully
deviate from the way) to the heavens (shamaym – to the spiritual realm and
abode of God), to a point above (min ma’al – beyond the largest dimension of)
God’s (‘el) stars (kowkab – luminaries and heavenly powers), and I will elevate
and exalt (ruwm – lift up) my throne (kise’ – place of honor and authority). I
will inhabit and dwell (yasab - inhabit) at the Mount (ba ha "......

In BDB/Thayer Hebrew and Greek Definitions kowkab means:
Original: כּוכב
- Transliteration: Kowkab
- Phonetic: ko-kawb'
- Definition:
1. star
a. of Messiah, brothers, youth, numerous progeny, personification, God's omniscience (fig.)
- Origin: probably from the same as H3522 (in the sense of rolling) or H3554 (in the sense of blazing)
- TWOT entry: 942a
- Part(s) of speech: Noun Masculine


could this mean that Heylel ben Shachar is trying to set his throne and authority above God's
children as well as or rather than above God's " stars "?
Thank you


Yada wrote:
There are several insights which can be drawn from kowkab. Stars are light and God is light, so Heylel wants his light to be seen as brighter than Yah's light. Spiritual beings are energy as opposed to matter and stars are the largest sources of energy. Stars are high in the heavens relative to the earth and ha satan wants to be seen as above God and all that He created. Yahowsha' is referred to as the "greater light" so Satan wants to be above Him. Stars are used in reference to the children of the Covenant, and Heylel sees himself as being more important than any of God's children. And of course, stars were false god back at the time this was communicated, and Satan wants to be worshipped as a god. So I think that all of these symbols apply.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#343 Posted : Friday, March 23, 2012 3:37:01 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
MW wrote:

I tried to download from ur article Genesis it does not download

Please could u help me answer this question?

When ABBA created us, mankind, what did He desire as the ideal "marriage" My heart cries out one man one woman, some elders here in SA and elsewhere says polygamy is allowed in Scripture to go read about Yacov and Dawied and Shlomo. I understand polygamy is allowed in Torah but WHAT WAS IN ABBA'S HEART for us?

I did read and I understand in my stupidity that these women were taken out of the flesh? Am I wrong here pls guide me in this. I am new to ur site so know not where to start. I have only read Questioning Paul.

I thank u for ur patience and ur answer

Shabbat shalom

MW
--
MW
Bondservant to Yahusha Ha Mashiach

םהדכת ולתר
יברכך יהוה וישׁמרך׃ יאר יהוה פניו אליך ויחנך׃ישׂא יהוה פניו אליך וישׂם לך שׁלום׃


Yada wrote:
MW,

First I would encourage you to refer to Yahowah as either Yahowah, Yah, God ('el), or Father ('ab), and not as Abba. If you want to use Hebrew, it is 'ab for father. Abba is Aramaic and from Paul. Paul was a false prophet.

The Covenant is Yahowah's goal, his model for everything. It is based upon a monogamous marriage vow. There is only one Covenant. If you look at the examples you have stated, with each of them additional wives brought them additional trouble. The more wives Dowd added the less effective his life became. Such is the case with the example of Yisra'el. The more gods and religions they considered, the more they became an example of what not to do. Dowd made many mistakes so that we can learn from them and not follow them.

Yah's testimony on this is made especially clear with the first marriage, that between Adam and Chawah in the Garden of Joy.

I have attached the Introduction to God. After you have read Questioning Paul, I'd encourage you to consider it. It focuses on Yahowah, His Towrah teaching and Covenant relationship.

Fall in love with one God, Yahowah, and with one wife. Be faithful to both. That is the best plan.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#344 Posted : Friday, March 23, 2012 7:48:57 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
MW wrote:
Shalom brother Yada

I thank u so much for this it is very much appreciated. Also thanks for teaching me the difference between Ab and Abba and for ur book which I will study.

I was called out of a lifetime of witchery at age 52, I was never a christian but an occultist all of my life and a practicing witch for 40 years. Then YHVH had Grace upon me and saved me from myself and the evil one I bless Him daily for this. I study alone from Scripture only and do not follow the teachings of mankind. What I know He has written on my heart and I bless Him for it.

After He called me I looked for fellowship amongst christians but was very disgusted at their practices and turned away from them after three weeks. I prayed that YHVH must write on me what He desires on my heart He is faithful and does so daily.

At that time I still did not really understand about His Son. YHVH taught me from the Tanakh only for approx the first 18 months, after I found the Names, He introduced me to the so called "new Testament" which I now understand is just a RENEWED COVENANT, and the testimony of Yahusha and His apostels. That was when I noticed that Shaul speaks against what is written and I was amazed until I read Revelations 2:2 and understood that there was something amiss with a self appointed 13th apostle,

But kept my mouth shut here in SA u dont dare speak out as a woman u are to keep ur mouth shut, well I lost my fear of speaking out as YHVH empowers us to speak Truth wether the people like it or not, only yesterday I was told that I dont know my "place" by a man very learned in christian doctrine, a leader of a flock of (goats) sheep. Peace on him I say.

I was living basically in seclusion in the house of homosexual boys who took me in after my divorce from my husband after a 36 year marraige, YHVH divorced me from this man, a drunkard, one who sexually abused our own daughter and who whored around with anything he could lay his hands on, Today my ex and I are great friends and he is in a happy relationship with another, YHVH has healed the wounds also for my child who is already 39 years old. That is TRUE LOVE from a FATHER who cares,

I can never thank Him enough for all He does for me and mine. My kid and two grandchildren are all baptized in the Name above all names. The youngest was baptized this past Shabbat, what a blessing! They are trying like myself to walk in the Righteous Ways of our Living Torah to think I was so evil that I trained the eldest grandchild from small to follow my witchy ways, He cleansed her as He cleansed me, that is TRUE GRACE, today she is a little soldier who calls on His Name, how blessed can one woman be.

I could never call YHVH god as I served ha satan as my god and lord all the days of my life, I struggled to find YHVH's Name for 18 months as I had no internet neither does His Name appear in my Scripture I had at the time. I was given a little book that had these arabic sounding Names in them but could not find a witness to their truth, YHVH then blessed me with internet access and sent me another witness on the Names, that very day I prayed in the Names and the demons that haunted me for my lifetime fled and I was free and one person only!! I used to be many persons in one u understand. Now it is YHVH YAHUSHA and I.

All my questions during the first two years after He called me, all my answers from Scripture I have written in a series of hardcover books all dated in my own handwriting, books full of one woman a horrible sinner being taught lovingly and with much patience by YHVH Himself through His Ruach. This writing urge started about three days after He called me and I wrote solidly for approx 18-20 months.

These books I treasure and will leave as a legacy to my children. In them they can read how I was taught to honor the Shabbat first of all, after the shabbat came the new moon, after the new moon the tzitzit, after that the moedim, then about eating clean, my whole "training" so to speak from the Tanakh before I even understood about His Blessed Son. Also He taught me to pray as I did not know how at all and still I am learning every day, it has not stopped.

So also I call HIM YAHUWAH today. The word god raises my hair am sure u will understand.

I served a multitude of gods in my life. I was so scared at first of this Light as I thought the evil one was playing a trick on me. It was an awesome GIFT to realise HE IS ONE.

When I started studying Shaul, He made this webpage known to me through a brother in faith, and I found Questioning Shaul. A hard word it is but true, I have often said to myself if christians will only understand this, the whole of christianity will fall to pieces as they have no foundation in Truth but have a man made god and a cheap grace. He did write beautiful words in line with Torah but he also did write things completely against all that is TRUE. I also found that 1 Kor 13 was in fact written by the Essenes and that they were not his words.

Sorry for rambling on so it is just so good to testify to the Wonder of Him for Whom I live today, I love Him with all I am and will never turn back that is my oath to Him. I have a testimony stretching over 52 years of disobedience and the Grace and Love that is our Creator blessed is He.

Brother u dont have to answer I understand that u must be a very busy man, I will however appreciate if u can put me in touch with one person who can give insight into questions that are rife here in SA. A very racist society, I cannot speak Hebrew or Greek I tried my heart out but alas as fast as I learn so fast I forget the language must be the strangeness of it am sure because I remember my Scripture well enough. I will ask the questions below and if somebody can help with insight I woll appreciate. Remain blessed my brother in all u do that is Right and Just.

Shabbat shalom

QUESTION ONE

How do I convince others (racists) that the Salvation is for ALL peoples of the earth? They twist Scripture to suit their doctrine of a HOLY ADAMIC WHITE RACE, which is just not true, as I understand we are made of A KIND because black and white can procreate. They call black people animals, this does not sit well with me at all.I am white but have lovely black brothers and sisters in faith who calls on the Names and who live Torah, also Indians and Coloureds.


QUESTION TWO

These people also teach others that the hissing one had sex with Chavah in die garden and that he was the father of Cain, a snake seed line and an "adamic" line. makes no sense to me at all. I traced the origins of this doctrine as u can read below; What can a person say to these poor lost ones to help them? We are so few left 3.5 million whites in SA and my people are truly going lost thru lack of knowledge as Hosea wrote. Have u maybe any teachings on these things?



The Serpent Seed idea appears in a 9th centurybook called Pirke De-Rabbi Eliezer.[9] Rabbi David Max Eichhorn, in his book Cain: Son ofthe Serpent, traces the idea back through early Jewish Midrashictexts and identifies many rabbis who taught that Cain was the son of the union between the serpent and Eve.[9] Some Kabbalist rabbis also believe that Cain and Abel were of a different genetic background than Seth. This is known among Kabbalists as "The Theory of Origins".[10] The theory teaches that God created two "Adams"(Adam means MAN in Hebrew). To one he gave a soul and to the other he did not give a soul. The one without a soul is the creature known in Christianity as the serpent. The Kabbalists call the serpent Nahash (meaning serpent in Hebrew). This is recorded in the Zohar:


Thank u my brother for listening this day

mw


Yada wrote:
Wow, MW, that is quite a journey. Thanks for sharing it. I'd love to hear your impressions regarding Satan sometime. I think I know and understand him pretty well from having studied the Qur'an and Hadith where he stars as Allah, then by studying Yahowah's testimony, and finally by coming to understand Paul's ploy, but you knew him personally. I only know him intellectually. So I'm curious if my portrayal of Satan in POD, QP, YY, and the ITG is consistent with your experience.

You will find the ITG useful. It provides the evidence needed to reject the human teachings you referenced. And you will find proof of how to properly pronounce YHWH as Yahowah.

There is no scriptural evidence that Cain was from Satan, and in fact, spiritual beings cannot have sex and thus mate with material beings. So the elders are wrong. Kabbala is Satanic as is the Zohar. All animals have souls. Man is an animal. Without a soul, we cease to exist. So no man could have been conceived without a soul.

As for racism, Yahowah only has a preference for one race, Yahuwdym. The rest of us "gowym - people from different races and places" are adopted into His Covenant family regardless of our race, gender, place of origin, status, or age. So once again, the elders are wrong. The color of one's skin is meaningless to Yahowah. And as spiritual beings, we won't have skin.

Once you come to know that Paul was a false prophet everything fits. Yahowah's testimony from beginning to end is consistent, reliable, and unchanging.

In the ITG you will learn enough about Hebrew to validate the evidence Yahowah has provided yourself. But should you be looking for good company, there are some people in South Africa who know Yahowah and who would be happy to correspond with you. I've reached out to one such individual via a bcc. He has already helped countless South Africans. He goes by the name of "Koos." We have communicated by email for may years. I consider Koos to be a friend and brother.

Also, you can join and participate in the Yada Yah Forum. It's free and it is filled with others who know Yahowah and who love His teaching. Lastly, I do an internet radio show M-F from 11.00 AM EDT to 12.30 PM EDT at http://radio.yadayahweh.com/. As part of that program there is a chat room that is also open to everyone and free to participate in. No one will know or care about your gender or race. There are no racists or sexists in Yahowah's family.

Keep in touch, MW.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#345 Posted : Friday, March 23, 2012 10:21:10 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
MW wrote:
Lol lol Koos was my human witness to His Name he had ur books printed for me today oh what a small world he also gave me ur site four years ago will write tom shabbat shalom


Yada wrote:
MW,

I'm not surprised. Koos is a powerful, knowledgeable, compassionate, and engaged witness for Yahowah in South Africa. The fact that in a racist and sexist nation that he reached out to help you in this way speaks volumes about him and his relationship with Yahowah. He exemplifies the Covenant. We are blessed to have Koos as our brother - although I prefer his Hebrew name: Jacobus is from Ya'aqob - the father of Yisra'el and the Covenant.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#346 Posted : Wednesday, March 28, 2012 2:57:19 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
lk wrote:
I noticed that you have used Yahweh and L told me you just noticed that. I am willing to send you a donation of a couple hundred $ towards to cost of changing that. I have no idea what these things cost but I'd like to help a little if I can. I like your web site and thank you for all the hard work you have put into it. I have learned a lot from you as many of us have. I can send you a check to a P.O. Box in your name Yada if you like.
LK


Yada wrote:
LK,

I've come to use Yahowah for the reasons explained in the attached ITG. I appreciate your desire to help us financially, but there is no need to send a check. We rather like being in the position of providing everything without charge or solicitation. So we haven't accepted donations. But if you'd like to promote the site, as L is doing, in the hope that more people benefit, then that would be great. Also, you may want to buy Logos software and translate Scripture yourself.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#347 Posted : Friday, March 30, 2012 3:42:12 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
RH wrote:
Hi Yada,

James sent a copy of the ITG to me last month in early Feb. Please send a copy of it to me if that's not the latest version.

I listen to your blogtalk radio show on the way home from work - I have an ah-hah moment almost daily. Yesterday it was the value of anything counterfeit.

If I were buying something from you and gave you a fake one dollar bill you might take it without question, but if I were to buy something of great value from you and paying with thousand dollar bills, you probably would examine them very carefully.

To the casual observer, religion can be very attractive, believe in salvation thru grace and you're saved, it's easy; I followed along for years without questioning the counterfeit LCMS. But the fate of ones sole (something I value highly) depends upon a very close examination of christianity - of the new testament books written by SOT (PAUL).

I have read and listened to QP and the truth that Paul was a false prophet hit me like a ton of feathers; it was easy because I had already been observing torah, like the seventh day of rest and Yah's 7 Miqra assemblies (Passover, Matzah, First Fruits etc.), but the fact that my parents had been deceived by christianity still hurts.

With your help, I have left religion behind and I am observing, and coming to know, to understand, to accept and respect Yah's Torah.

Thank you for taking the time to present the truth to us and for giving us the tools to find out for ourselves. I've been reading your website since I found you on talk radio one evening years ago explaining the evils of Islam. I purchased the books, POD and TWT and would purchase more of all of your books but you have given them to us for free and read them on my iPhone.

You have made scriptures come to life for me and I now have a yearning to learn; I still have so much more to learn and look forward to reading your upcoming books. I would like to see a rev to TOM without SOT in it.


Shalom,
RH


Yada wrote:
Thank you for the thoughtful and encouraging letter, Robert. While I would be observing Yahowah's Towrah teaching even if I was the only beneficiary, the idea that my study has made the Scriptures come alive for others is very gratifying. James who sent you a copy of the ITG is also a serious student of Yah's Word. I'm glad that he introduced us.

I like your extrapolation of the counterfeit concept. Nothing is more valuable than our souls. If ever we should be diligent and verify the offer it is with regard to the Covenant.

I've received hundreds of letters now from those who have read QP. And thus far 100% of those who have read the entire book have come to the same conclusion - and are now happy for having done so. It is a huge relief to be rid of Paul and Christianity. Yah's Towrah is vastly superior in every respect.

I'm a third through editing Yada Yah and am happy to send you the revised chapters, but I'm not able to get my friend Ken to remove Paul from TOM. It is very sad, even disappointing. He is unwilling to read QP.

I've attached the most recent draft of the ITG. Not much has changed in a month because my attention has been on correcting Yada Yah.

Thanks for listening to the radio program.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#348 Posted : Monday, April 2, 2012 4:24:31 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
FS wrote:
Hi Yada,

I’m taking James advice, and personally thanking you for your series on, Dowd’s, Psalms/Songs. While I can’t wait to hear all your findings, and I do my best checking out what you say, my wife just couldn’t get enough of your insights into, Psalms. She loved how Dowd learned of the benefits of “shamaring,” Yahs, Torah. She was hospitalized during some of the presentation and I would show up to her room at night so I could spend it with her till morning. I would also download the YY show on my IPOD, and connect the little speakers to it and then turn it on in her room. Even those days when she was knocked out, I would tippy toe in and just start the show half way in. She would smile right through the drugs, as if she were not hampered by them. It was wonderful, and I know if we ever get to meet one day, she wants to give you a hug.

Yada wrote:
Wow that is among the most encouraging things I've read in some time. Dowd's inspired song was designed to do exactly what you and your wife used it to accomplish. It is like listening to our Father teach us what we need to know to become His perfect and immortal children. And while neither Yahowah, nor Dowd, make any promises to heal our bodies in this life, their promise that the Towrah, its Covenant and Invitations, will prepare us for living in our Heavenly Father's Home should we shamar them, should be music to all of our ears.


Right now, we are busy skipping her own treatments after they removed the, “cancer.” And I can’t help but think it has its reasons. The reason why. While she was going through all this, I was being accused by her family(catholics) of putting a demon into my wife b/c my wife has completely rejected their ways.

Yada wrote:
Roman Catholics are among the most misled souls on earth. It is amazing and bewildering to consider all of the Babylonian religious rubbish they have been led to swallow. Wrong in every imaginable way, they believe that they are right. Their religion and their priests are an abomination to God.

All you can do is either distance yourself from them or ignore their comments. They have been indoctrinated to believe that anyone who differs from them is demonic. Muslims are the same in this regard. So rather than considering the obvious errors of the faith, they slander the messengers who point out the obvious. And yet, there is some part of us that out of compassion still wants to help them no matter how ugly or hateful their response.


While I thought at one time, I might have been too strong in my insistance of leading her away from Babylon, she now tells me, no way. She was always hearing.

Yada wrote:
This is a rare victory. Most people would not have been willing to listen under these circumstances. So there was either something in your approach, or something in her mind, which triggered a willingness to consider Yahowah. And it may have been the disease. It may have weakened her resistance, or it may have opened her up to help. But what ever the reason, this is a rare blessing.


To make a long story short, we are now raising her, now invalid mother, b/c she went down with a stroke and heart attack, along with her brother who fell out also right after my wife went into her surgery. I was standing strong in her room by not allowing prayers to their, “lord” and this caused a lot of division to the point I almost physically removed another of her brothers from her room after he ignored my warnings.

Yada wrote:
Good for you. That took a great deal of courage - and indeed love for your wife and our God. You did the right thing.

Caring for those who demean you is not easy. I suspect that you and your wife will feel good about this someday, but today it must be a horrible burden. It reminds me of what Yahowsha' must have felt approaching Pesach.


Well after all this, we are the ones now nursing her family back to health. I allowed them to come live with us, and we now have a house full of, christians and catholics. They all notice how all of the trinkets we once had, are gone, destroyed. But the greatest thing that myself enjoys in it all, besides us showing our loving side, against their will. My own 2 sons who really care for those on my wifes side, but too, can’t stand them b/c og their manners, insist now that I archieve the old YY shows in the shop so as to keep my wifes family away from them while they are busy doing their, 8 to 5, routine....I laugh, b/c they are in a way, like I told James, using the YY shows as a repellent against our visitors.

Yada wrote:
The Towrah is not only a shield against religion, it is the only viable and reliable protection. As I think of it now, that is the reason Paul attacked the Towrah. For his religion to succeed, the Towrah had to be kicked out of people's view. It was a huge risk, but one Paul had to take to prevail.


I’ll take what I can from my boys. They are busy removing the stain of religion and politics from their own lives, but coming to know Yah has been another thing, for them.

Yada wrote:
Both of my sons have removed the stain of religion from their lives, and one has come to know Yah. So long as they take that first step, the second is achievable. But as you know, we cannot choose for them. All we can do is share with them, teach them, guide them, and love them.


But Yada, really man, thanks for all your efforts once more. I almost wanted to cry yesterday when my youngest son, Tim, asked me, “didn’t you tell me that the YY show was in a pdf file.” He went to RM's site and downloaded it onto his,Kindle. My wife and I last nite when all had settled down and we took our own, Kindle into our bedroom and started reading, we stopped and gave thanks for what’s happening in our lives. We accept all challenges gratiously and a big part of that was a good long conversation I had over the phone with BC, before taking in her family. I just love, BC. I share his wonderful story with many.
Thanks again, bro!

Fred Snell

Yada wrote:
You have replaced one family, one which is lost and broken, with another, one which is enlightened and perfected. I'd say that you and your wife made a pretty good trade. I'm blessed to have these men as brothers.

As you probably know, while I am very encouraged by your letter, I'm not comfortable taking any credit for anything. Dowd wrote the song. Yahowah inspired Him. And more to the point, Yahowah conceived, authored, and enabled all of His Covenant promises and Towrah teachings. James, RM, BC, you and I are just messengers conveying Yah's message. And yet while that is true, there is no more rewarding, enjoyable, or enlightening job in the universe. It is good to be a tool in the right hands.

One last thought. Among the most inspiring and transforming things I've ever done in life was "shamaring" the 119th Psalm. So it is especially nice to know that it is having the same effect in your lives.

My prayer is for your wife's recovery. But more than that, I pray that your children become Yahowah's children.

In Yah's Name,

Yada

PS, since your situation is similar to all of ours with our extended families, I'd like to share this anonymously in the Forum if that is alright with you.
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#349 Posted : Monday, April 2, 2012 4:10:34 PM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
C wrote:
Hi Yada
Hope you are well. I send this to you as you have demonstrated so many times about Yah’s timeline.
Maybe you can comment on this when you have time.
C
Food for thought or paradigm shift????
How old was Yahowsha’ when He went to the stauros and why do we believe it?

Most theologians teach that Yahowsha’ was 33when he went to the cross, and most of us believe it, but what do we know from the Scripture?
1. Qurinius was pro‐Counsel in Syria when Yahowsha’ was born. (Luke 2:2)
2. A census sent Mary and Joseph to Bethlehem. (Luke 2:3)
3. Herod ordered babies killed two years old and under. (Mat 2:16)

What We Know from Recorded History.1
1. Herod died in June of 4 B.C. (GAD)2
2. Quirinius was pro‐council in Syria, 7‐8 B.C. (GAD) (Stone inscription indicates Quirinius was twice in Syria)
3. The Romans took a census every 14 years.
4. Archeological support for the Roman census of 6A.D., however, all authorities agree, 6 A.D. too late for birth of Yahowsha’.
5. Archeological support for the Roman census of 8 B.C.!
6. No archeological support for a Roman census between those two dates.
1Documentation: Packer‐Tenny‐White, Zondervan’s Pictorial Bible Encyclopedia, Halley’s Bible Handbook, the Internet, etc. There is never‐ending scholarly argument about 1st century dating, available data was correlated and conclusions drawn from that picture.
2 GAD = Generally Accepted Date
ScripturalForties, Why so Many?
1. Rained 40 days and 40 nights during the flood, Gen 7:4
2. Noah remained in the ark 40 days after dry land appears, Gen 8:6
3. Moses was in the wilderness 40 years, Act 7:30
4. Moses was on the Mountain 40 days, Exo 24:18, DEU 9:18
5 Malefactors were scourged with 40 stripes, Deu 25:3
6. Israelites were fed manna in the wilderness 40 years, Exo 16:35
7. Tabernacle had 40 silver sockets, Exo 26:19
8. There were 40 year periods of peace, Judges 3:11, 5:31, 8:28
9 Eli (a high priest) judged Israel 40 years, 1Sam 4:18
10. Elijah was on the mountain 40 days, 1Ki 19:8
11. David ruled Israel 40 years, 1Ki 2:11
12. Solomon ruled Israel 40 years, 1Ki 11:42
13. Temple nave 40 cubits, 1Ki 7:35
14. Yahowsha’ was in the wilderness 40 days, Mat 4:2
15. Yahowsha’ appeared to the disciples for 40 days, Act 1:3


Two Reasons This is Important.
1. Knowing the correct length of Yahowsha’s earthly life is keyto understanding two prophecies in Ezekiel.
2. Proves one traditional view long taught in the Church to be incorrect, making other traditions suspect.

Incidentally, according to Jewish tradition, a man had to be 40 years of age to become a ruling member in the Sanhedran. Until Yahowsha’ was 40, He was thought to be just another rebel in Israel. But when Yahowsha’ entered Jerusalem that final time, He was greeted by the people (in anapantesis) as a king. If He was 40, He could have seized control and the Pharisees knew it. That’s why they said such things as . . .
John 11:48 “If we let him thus alone, all men will believe on him: and the Romans shall come and take away both our place and nation.”
At 40, Rabbi Yahowsha’ could have become their ruler, so the Pharisees believed they had to kill Him to stay in power.


Crag wrote:
C,

There are so many historical errors in this and false religious assumptions it doesn't strike me as being something which needs to be refuted. Yahowsha's age was irrelevant. That notion gets back to the idea of Him being born and dying. And while 40 is relevant, they are not making the appropriate connection of 40 Yowbel to year 4000 Yah. Yahowsha' was not a rabbi and He did not adhere to Jewish religious traditions.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#350 Posted : Monday, April 2, 2012 4:14:54 PM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
n wrote:
Hi I am seeking truth I know Jesus Christ is real and I also have been given messages about Abba Yah - Yahuveh...and also Yawah...YAHWAH.

In the covenant with Christ the new man emerges and the soul is purged. The covenant with the Jews is eternal.

I used to think Paul as also a false apostle.

But then I found it was likely he was the gentile apostle and it wasnt my place to judge.

I am seeking to enter into covenant with God..and its been a juggling act because I keep getting new info and also I get scared one way or the other.

I have found a more pure approach to the gospel of Christ that seems to be working..but I will need to be baptised in the spirit and speak in tongues some say this gift isnt important but they obviously dont know the edyfying work of the pure spirit of Jesus nor the true joy in the manna from heaven and his heavely glory which descends in both oil smell annointing and the like.

He is truly beautiful..and forms a hym of praise from the mouth of babes...

I beleive one new man is being formed frm the two covenants Yahu...as it sorts itsself out..and Jesus...Christ..

Some people really respond negatively to miracles and i think God is a God of miracles and huge power and can do anything and miracles are wonderful and there is nothing wrong with healing miracles nor to request or expect this wonderful things especially when it comes to the here-after and true life of the holy creation.

I was told in a dream the other night Abba Yah is the God who will establish universal peace...

I need to secure and clarify my covenant with God so that I may receive the holy spirit of promise and be totally clear about what my personal arangement with him are.

I want to conform to his way..and walk in his righteous truth.

I realise it would be wise to keep all sabbaths and other observances which I have never done. I would need a community to do it because I dont know how to do it on my own at all.

Jesus the eternal Galelaien is a dream boat of heavenly mercy.

May the grace of the lord Jesus be with your spirit.

-n


Yada wrote:
"Jesus Christ" is unknowable as there was no one named "Jesus Christ." If you want to know Yahowah, then I'd encourage you to read the attached Introduction to God. Once you come to know Yahowah, you will know Yahowsha'.

The Covenant is explained in the Towrah and nowhere else. The five terms and conditions you must accept to participate in the Covenant are presented in the attached book as Yahowah presented them in His Towrah.

Paul is a false apostle, and we must judge to make appropriate decisions. Yahowah wants us to be judgmental. If you are seeking absolute proof that Paul should not be trusted, read www.QuestioningPaul.com.

Speaking in tongues is utter nonsense. The only way to Yahowah is through His Towrah. Period. Observe the Towrah - which is what the attached ITG teaches.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
14 Pages«<56789>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.