logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

14 Pages«<34567>»
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Yada  
#201 Posted : Sunday, January 2, 2011 7:22:51 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

"K" writes yet again:

Quote:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 1:20 AM, "K"wrote:

Why wouldn't you be a Jew. What's wrong with being a Jew if anything and Judaism - what's wrong with that. Don't they believe the Torah and the prophets. Without them, I doubt we would have it. A lot of what you've said sounds like you have more in common with Judaism. What's your similarities? (Don't they also believe in the sacred feasts.) What's your differences?

-K


Yada's response:
Quote:

K,

There is nothing wrong with being a Jew. Given the choice of race, I'd prefer to be a racial Yahuwdym. But I am not a Jew because my mother, nor my father, nor their mothers nor their fathers, nor their mother's mothers nor their father's fathers were Jewish. While I can choose my Heavenly Father and Spiritual Mother, I cannot choose my earthly father nor mother. And that is why Yahowsha' told us that we must be willing to leave them.

Judaism is as wrong as is Christianity. Both religions reject the Torah and ignore the prophets. While Christians cling to Paul and reject Yahowah and Yahowsha', religious Jews revere the Talmud and observe rabbinical edits. You seem to know as little about the true nature of Judaism as you do the actual origins of Christianity.

Yahowah choose to reveal His Word through racial Yahuwdym / Jews. That is why they are called the "Chosen People." It had nothing to do with them, and everything to do with Him. But, that does not make the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms "Jewish," any more than the Gutenberg Bible is German because of the press it was printed upon. Dowd/David, Moseh/Moses, and Yashayah/Isaiah were not authors, but instead scribes.

Your religious indoctrination has caused you to believe that observing the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms, and trusting what Yahowah has to say therein, is akin to Judaism. You are completely unaware of the differences between Rabbinic/Pharisaic Judaism and Yahowah's Word because you don't know Yahowah's Word nor understand how all religions differ from it. And in your present state of mind, you never will.

At issue is that you remain focused on "my beliefs" rather than upon God's testimony. Until that changes, nothing God has to say will make any difference to you.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Richard  
#202 Posted : Sunday, January 2, 2011 7:35:12 AM(UTC)
Richard
Joined: 1/19/2010(UTC)
Posts: 695
Man
United States

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 7 post(s)
Yada wrote:
At issue is that you remain focused on "my beliefs" rather than upon God's testimony. Until that changes, nothing God has to say will make any difference to you.


You know, that is exactly right, Yada. When I have shared the truth with another, he responded by calling the things I had shared with him as my own "personal beliefs" rather than as the testimony of hundreds of years of history and thousands of years of Scripture, as though I had just that moment made it all up. It's frustrating, isn't it?
Offline Yada  
#203 Posted : Sunday, January 2, 2011 8:07:18 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 2:34 PM, "MB" wrote:

Yada:

A quick translation query regarding Acts 15:7-11:

According to Questioning Paul (chapter 4) you have translated the passage to say that Peter said Acts 15:7-9 and that Paul interrupted Peter and said verses 10-11.

Initially I checked with Swalchy, as usual, but in this case I also made contact with a retired scholar by the name of Carl Conrad from the Department of Classics at Washington University. He confirmed my two initial reasons and added a third, but brief, reason as to why Paul did not interrupt Peter:

1) If Paul had interrupted then the author of the book of Acts would have stated it, an example of where an interruption did occur is Acts 26:24.

2) Through the use of the opening words in verse 9 it shows a continuation of thought from the same person, and not an interruption from another.

3) By beginning with the words ανδρες αδελφοι ("brothers") and extending through σωθηναι καθ ον τροπον κακεινοι ("to be saved in the same manner as they") the author clearly intends for us to believe that Peter said the whole passage.

My issue really comes from the fact your translation is the first in my view to say Paul interrupted Peter. Are there perhaps others who can confirm your translation? I have currently only consulted two Greek scholars and both have shown only Peter being the speaker of the said passage.

King regards,

-MB


Yada's response:

Quote:
M,

Why write me regarding this? You know that I have studied the Acts 15 passage and that I disagree with regard to verses 10-11. I am convinced that Shim'own did not, and would not, say these things. Paul, however, would.

So, either this marks the transition between speakers or Paul misquoted Peter before Luke and Luke believed Paul, and thus wrote something which was not accurate. Besides scribal error, I'm convinced that these are the only rational choices. But, should there be a meaningful point in doing so, you are free to disagree. Acts isn't Scripture. Neither Peter's nor Paul's words were inspired.

However, both of your sources know that we do not have a credible early manuscript of Acts--making this call more speculation than anything else. Both know that Luke was closest to Paul, and that Luke believed someone we now know was a liar. Both know that there are major differences between the Galatians account of this meeting and the one found in Acts--so someone is lying. Both know that Luke wasn't at the meeting. Both know that Acts was written ten to twenty years after the meeting. Both know that there are no quotation marks to resolve the issue. And both know that the two part letter which became Luke and Acts was not inspired by God.

So, the best, most rational way to resolve this rather meaningless historical dispute is to consider whether the line is something Peter or Paul would most likely say, as it sits between their "known" comments. For me, the answer is an easy one. The quotation is either inaccurate and/or improperly attributed. But why do you care?

Apart from Yahowsha's statements accurately remembered, properly translated into Greek, accurately copied by scribes, and retained on multiple and consistent early second-century manuscripts, in Mattinyahu, Yahowchanan, and the Revelation to Yahowchanan, I trust very little of the "New Testament." So to debate something in Acts, written by someone who was not a disciple, regarding a debate between a Disciple and a false apostle, is a waste of time, at least apart from understanding Paul--a man who hung himself with every letter he wrote.

If this statement in Acts was the only citation available to condemn Paul, then the case against him would not be worth pursuing. But the opposite of that is true. Every letter written by Paul, claimed by Paul, and attributed to Paul is false. They are anti-Yahowah, anti-Yahowsha', anti-Covenant, and anti-Torah. Additionally, Paul's witness in Acts reflects the same doctrine found in his letters.

I stated my reasons for concluding that the statement in Acts 15.10-11 should be attributed to Paul, not Peter, in the Anomos chapter. You, your scholastic friend, and Stephen are free to disagree. My question is: knowing that Paul's letters are not only false, but have led billions away from Yahowah, why dispute this? If it is Peter speaking, and if it was accurately memorialized and retained, it does not exonerate Paul, and it calls Peter's witness into question. How is that helpful? And should your point be "accuracy," on something unrelated to our salvation, unrelated to Yahowah's and Yahowsha's testimony, you'd be kidding yourself--as the evidence itself isn't reliable.

It is important to know what Yahowah said in the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms. And it is important to expose and condemn all testimony to the contrary. Everything else is a waste of our time.

Yada

If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#204 Posted : Sunday, January 2, 2011 8:41:29 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 9:24 PM, "JB" wrote:

Yada,

I wasn't sure if this was a good contact for you or not, figured I'd try.

Been thinking about you lately as I missed the last two shows (KGAB) because of work.

Hearing talk from the folks...they don't want to hear what you have to say anymore.

I wanted to pass this along to you:

Last week on the show, Ron called in saying he was sick of your "hate mongering" and calling Paul a false prophet.

I had to call in as I had just been fixated on the 14th chapter of John.

Here Yeshua talks to the disciples about the comforter, the Holy ghost, even the "Spirit of Truth".

Notice how He says that the Holy Spirit would bring to their remembrance everything HE said to them... NOT Paul, NOT the law and the prophets, but what HE YESHUA said, being the Word of Yahweh himself, fulfilling all things.

That's what I said on the air. They hate what I say too. I consider it a blessing.

The next day folks were talking about the "wars".

I called in and said " well if these were wars, we wouldv'e taken over Iraq and Afghanistan by now, spoiled them, and made them the 51st and 52nd States...or if you're Obama, the 58th and 59th States!"

I always try to throw in some humor when possible!

Anyway, I can't wait to talk to you again, and hear you on the show.

Feel free to write back/ keep in touch, we really seem to hit it off on the radio.

You are one of the few people that I know who actually love the Truth no matter how much it hurts.

-"J"


Yada's response:

Quote:


"J,"On the last two shows I openly criticized patriotism and religion. I even warned Dave before the last two shows, advising him to disagree with me, so as not to lose his job. In America, evidence and reasoning which conflict with popular sentiment is considered "hateful." I really love Dave, and would hate to see his career cut short because of his willingness to have me on his program.

Christianity and Republican politics have become intertwined with a good dose of militarism in the mix. It's lies supporting lies. And yet, not one in a million Americans is aware that they have been deceived. They don't know that our invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan were based upon lies, and that our role is suicidal. They don't even care.

But religion and politics are a tough foe. They preclude thinking, and cause their victims to crucify messengers whose messages they cannot refute. And they are in the majority, effectively silencing voices like mine and yours. I fully expect this Thursday's program at 7.00 am pst to be my last on KGAB.

Paul was a false apostle. Yahowsha' warned us against him. Paul's message is the antithesis of Yahowah's Word. Therefore, the only things worthy of our time are to reveal what Yahowah/Yahowsha' said and expose all messages to the contrary.

I am glad that you wrote me. I have enjoyed your calls. Thanks for engaging in the spiritual battle on the side of God. It is a pleasure to know you, "J".

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Matthew  
#205 Posted : Sunday, January 2, 2011 10:49:45 AM(UTC)
Matthew
Joined: 10/3/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,191
Man
Location: São Paulo, Brazil

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
I was going to copy Yada's response here to my email now, but I see it just got posted already. I'm "MB" by the way referred to in post #211.
Offline Yada  
#206 Posted : Tuesday, January 4, 2011 7:31:04 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:30 AM, "AF" wrote:

Hi Yada,

I would like to thank you so much for your teachings and radio programs that I have been so eager to download. May Yahweh continue to bless you. protect you and give you His peace. If I may I would like to share with you a bit about my background. I'm a British Jewish believer in Yahshua (the only believer in my family), called and now residing in Indonesia. I'm married to Mita, who is also the only believer in Yahshua from a moslem family. Mita and I teach and preach to the so-called (sorry Yada) church, Yahweh's truths in relation to the restoration of all things. As we share with others, we see so much rejection of the truth. As we study what you teach about Paul, we cannot thank Yahweh so much that He has revealed much truths through you.

If you agree, M and I would like to continue to communicate with you.

Shalom
A


Yada's response:

Quote:
Hello A,

Welcome to Yahowah's family. While I appreciate your kind words, I'm sure you and your wife know that every benefit you have derived from God's Word has come from Yahowah, not me. I'm nothing more than an unqualified and flawed implement, albeit a passionate and willing one.

This is a wonderful time to be a Yahuwdy/Jew. I am adopted into Yahowah's family, while you were born naturally and then reconciled. You are an early witness to what will soon occur on Yowm Kippurym.

So long as you continue to share the truth about Yahowah, it matters not where you do it. That said, you have to have great courage, compassion, and perseverance to share what you know as a Jew, married to a former Muslim, in churches in an Islamic nation. Your mission humbles me.

Paul was not just an enemy of Yahowah/Yahowsha' and His Towrah, he was an avowed enemy of Yahuwdym/Jews. Recognizing that Paul was a false apostle should be very liberating for you.

Please, stay in touch.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#207 Posted : Tuesday, January 4, 2011 7:33:19 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
Hi J,

I admire and respect your love and devotion to your daughter. It reminds me of another Father I know. I am so very pleased that the Boss introduced us nearly a decade ago.

I'm 250 pages into writing a new book to introduce Yada Yahweh. It's a project you have championed. In it I'm trying to cover the seven most important issues, but in great detail rather than superficially. In the process I'm consistently comparing Yahowah's Word to the Latin Vulgate, the KJV, and the NLT. It's appalling. So I agree with your stated mission.

J, I am gradually learning to be a more accurate translator, but my only qualifications remain my passion for getting it right and my realization that I'm unqualified. But even then, my stimulation and satisfaction come from recognizing what the passage means, and how it relates to Yahowah's Word as a whole. So, I'm more about sharing insights based upon His Word, than I am about just translating His Word. And I'm pathetically slow. It takes me forever to translate and consider a passage, and even then I'm only sharing a small percentage of what God intended for us to know.

Several months ago I began openly criticizing the modern Babylon on KGAB, advising people to walk away from man's religious, political, economic, and militaristic schemes, while sharing Yah's Word. It has generated tremendous anger. I thought I should let you know. I expect this Thursday's show to be my last with Dave based upon the way his audience has reacted to my criticisms of Paul, of Christianity, and of American politics and militarism.

I've pasted the first 70 pages of the new book below. While I've written 250 pages, it is a mix of complete and incomplete chapters. The seven primary topics are:

The Covenant
The Commandments
The Called-Out Assemblies
The Towrah
The Prophets
The Words and Names
Coming Out of Babylon

Yada


Yahowah

…Who is God and What Does He Want?





Towrah – Instruction



‘Amar ‘eth ‘elohym – A Conversation With God…

Yahweh, or more precisely transliterated, Yahowah (pronounced using ‘Elowah – Almighty God and Towrah – Instructions as a guide), is God’s one and only name. Based upon the Hebrew verb hayah, God’s personal and proper name means: “I Am,” and “I Exist.” So now that we know His name, who is Yahowah, and what does He want?

To answer these questions, we have a lot of ground to cover. In order to appreciate what Yahowah had to say about Himself, and His relationship with us, many religious myths will have to be shattered, and new, fertile ground will need to be plowed. So in the pages which follow, we will pull the weeds of heresy. We will lay fallow false terminology, replacing it with God’s testimony. Through careful husbandry, we will cultivate an appreciation for God’s Word, and reveal the proper names and titles our Creator selected, and then explain how these were designed to be known and spoken. We will expose the sordid history of today’s bible translations and uncover the tools which can be used to accurately convey what God actually revealed.

In this prologue to the Torah, God’s foundational testimony comprised of BaRe’syth – In the Beginning (Genesis), Shemowth – Names (Exodus), Qara’ – Called-Out (Leviticus), BaMidbar – In the Wilderness (Numbers), and Dabarym – Words (Deuteronomy), we will examine Yahowah’s Instructions, consider His most sweeping prophecies relative to our salvation, and analyze what really happened during the three most important days in human history—Passover, Unleavened Bread, and FirstFruits in 33 CE. We will discuss who the Ma’aseyah Yahowsha’ really is (the diminished corporeal manifestation of Yahowah set-apart from Him to do the work required to save us), and who He is not (the Lord Jesus Christ). We will contemplate what He did (by observing, fulfilling, and enabling the Torah’s promises), and what He did not do (die on a cross to save us). We will detail the seven-step path Yahowah provided to enable us to live forever in His home as part of His family.

Since it is central to Yahowah’s purpose, the very reason for creating us, we will consider His Covenant, discussing what it actually represents, and then determine whether or not it has been changed or renewed. All along the way we will scrutinize the terminology Yahowah revealed under a microscope, amplifying His every word, so that we learn as much as possible. The overall portrait God has painted with words will be exposed from the perspective of the Artist’s finest brushstrokes.

Should you be able to endure this level of detail, should you be willing to invest the time required to examine all the connections and associations God has made, contemplating the symbols and metaphors which permeate His every thought, you will come to “yada’ – know” Yahowah. Should you be able to open your mind, to alter your perspective, and change your thinking, you will come to know God as He revealed Himself. What’s more, you will be properly prepared to capitalize upon the plan of salvation He Himself facilitated.

God will soon tell us that His Towrah delineates the means to salvation. But that is so contrary to the teachings of the Jewish, Christian, and Islamic religions, most will simply reject this reality, choosing instead to cling to the misguided tenets of their faith. For the religious, God’s Word will not be sufficient to free them from their beliefs. In fact, the onslaught of irrefutable evidence and unassailable logic God provides will be wasted on those beguiled by man’s religious schemes. Just as Jews disregard Moseh’s (Moses’) eye-opening sermons in favor of mind-numbing Rabbinical arguments, Christians disregard Yahowsha’s (errantly known as “Jesus’”) Sermon on the Mount in favor of Paul’s hopelessly conflicting epistles, and Muslims disregard the fact that Muhammad’s Qur’an is the antithesis of Yahowah’s Torah, most of those seeking God will be precluded from finding Him by their religions.

A thorough investigation of the evidence pertaining to mankind’s presence in the universe, and to an accurate understanding of God, leads to an inescapable conclusion: the Scripture Yahowah inspired—His Torah, Prophets, and Psalms—remains the world’s only rational candidate for divine writ. Now, I don’t expect you to concur with me, or Him, in this regard, seeing as you are reading the seventh paragraph of a three-hundred-page book introducing a three-thousand-page review of Yahowah’s testimony, but I have no doubt that, somewhere along this journey, those of you who are intellectually honest will render a similar verdict. Frankly, the case Yahowah makes on behalf of His revelation is so compelling; I’m amazed most people continue to stumble in the dark.

As evidence of God’s position on this issue, please consider the following introduction to amplified Scripture: “Yahowah’s (YaHoWaH’s) Towrah (towrah – authorized directions, law, instruction, and prescription for living) is complete and entirely perfect (tamym – without defect, lacking nothing, correct, sound, genuine, right, helpful, healing, beneficial, and true), returning, restoring, and transforming (suwb – turning around and bringing back) the soul (nepesh – our consciousness). Yahowah’s (YaHoWaH’s) testimony (‘eduwth – and witness) is trustworthy and reliable (‘aman – verifiable, confirming, supportive, and establishing), making understanding and obtaining wisdom (hakam – educating and enlightening to the point of comprehension) simple for the open-minded (pethy).” (Psalm 19:7)

According to God, the means to understanding, even to wisdom, as well as to the restoration of our soul, is to trust Yahowah’s testimony”—which is found in the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms (Writings). So that is where we will focus our attention, seeking to determine whether or not God’s witness can in fact be relied upon. Can we trust what He has to say? After all, according to this passage, so long as we are open minded, that is to say so long as we are receptive to what He has to say, such proof should be easy to find.

And that is why, even in this Prologue to the Towrah I’m going to endeavor to use God’s Word to describe the foundation He Himself established, and thereby communicate an entirely different perspective from which to consider the evidence—one which will enable you to actually know and understand Yahowah and His plan of salvation. By the time you have reached its conclusion, you will become acquainted with many things, including: the challenges inherent in translation, the history and corruption of the textual witness, as well as the emergence of counterfeit names, words, titles, and rituals. But more than this, you will be given a window into the mind of God, and come, perhaps for the first time, to understand His nature, His purpose, His timing, and His plan—especially as it pertains to the creation of a Covenant—a personal and familial relationship where we are invited to walk with, to talk with, and to be upright in the presence of God Himself. In these pages you will discover the extraordinary means God deployed so that we might camp out with Him for all eternity.

Speaking of perspective, lurking beneath the surface of the 19th Psalm is a corollary which should not be missed. The Towrah’s ability to transform and renew souls is predicated upon understanding Yahowah’s Word. And while He stated that “enlightenment and comprehension” would be “simple for those who are open” to His message, that will not come easy to those whose minds have been closed by religious beliefs—as faith repels evidence of its failings. Therefore, if God can be trusted, your salvation will be predicated upon your attitude and your thinking. I hope that you are up for this challenge.

Recognizing that three out of every four people living today, some five billion Christians, Muslims, and Secular Humanists, have been conditioned to believe that the Torah is no longer pertinent, and that it has been superseded by more modern approaches to life, I’d be remiss if I didn’t encourage you to contemplate the ramifications of what was just revealed. By stating that “Yahowah’s Towrah is complete and perfect,” that “the Towrah” is responsible for “restoring our soul, transforming us,” and by saying that “Yahowah’s…testimony is trustworthy and reliable,” even “easy to understand,” God undermined the foundations of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam with a single statement. He contradicted the messages delivered by the Apostle Paul (that the Torah was obsolete and cannot save), by Rabbi Akiba (that rabbis must interpret the Torah using their Oral Law), and by the Prophet Muhammad (that the Qur’an (which is the antithesis of the Towrah) is God’s first, last, and perfect revelation). The very God all three of these men used to justify their authority, the God they all claimed to speak on behalf of, told us not to believe them.

This is an astonishing observation, so let’s linger here a moment longer. Paul, who sought to be a rabbi, wrote Galatians and Romans (his first and sixth letters) for the express purpose of convincing his audience that the Torah was now obsolete, that the Torah was a cruel taskmaster which enslaved, that God’s Law was of the flesh, that Yahowah’s instructions should be ignored, and that this Torah never had the power to save anyone. And it was upon these letters that the religion of Christianity was conceived. And yet based upon this statement from Yahowah (and many others like it), one affirmed by the Ma’aseyah Yahowsha’ (the correct title and name for “Jesus Christ”) in His Sermon on the Mount, Paul lied, and therefore cannot be trusted. And without Paul’s letters, there is no “New Testament,” no “Gospel of Grace,” no “salvation by faith.” Simply stated: Christianity dies with Paul—a man whose doctrine God just refuted. I don’t share this with you to make you angry, but in hopes that Christian readers might be able to cleanse their mental slate, or at least realize that it may require some scrubbing, because the only informed and rational conclusion which can be drawn from this passage is that Paul’s letters were not inspired and are not reliable. (For more on this, I encourage you to visit and read: www.QuestioningPaul.com.)

“Yahowah’s Torah” is comprised of God’s “prescriptions for living,” His “authorized directions.” It “lacks nothing,” which would include the means to our salvation. The Torah is “beneficial and healing,” which is particularly telling when one considers that the Greek euangelion (which has been errantly rendered “Gospel”) literally means: “beneficial and healing message.” Based upon the Psalm, God’s Word is unchanged from beginning to end. Especially relevant in this regard is the fact that the purpose of Yahowah’s Torah is to “restore and transform our soul” so that we can “return” to Him. It makes the Torah the eternal path to God.

In due time, we shall discover something astonishing: the Way to God is presented in the heart of the Torah. This path is comprised of a seven-step plan whereby Yahowah Himself provided the means to eternal life through the promises contained in His seven “Mow’ed Miqra’ey – Called-Out Assembly Meetings. Our salvation begins with “Pesach – Passover” and culminates in “Sukah – Shelters,” where we are invited to camp out with our Heavenly Father.

I realize that this view is astonishingly unpopular, and totally unfamiliar, but ought not God’s opinion on this issue matter more than humankind’s—no matter how many religious people there are who oppose His view? Simply stated, if God used prophecy to prove that He exists, and that He inspired the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms, as this book will affirm, then who are we to contradict Him?

While this Psalm serves as a wholesale repudiation of Pauline Doctrine and thus of Christianity, it wasn’t the only religion impaled by Yahowah’s Word—just the first. Rabbi Akiba’s Rabbinic and Pharisaic Judaism, which is the surviving form of the religion codified by Maimonides and practiced today, was predicated on the notion that the pronunciation of God’s name was unknown, that it should never be spoken, that His Torah was not complete which necessitated their Oral Law, that they, not He, controlled the fate of Jewish souls. They professed that the only way to understand their nameless god’s rules was to rely upon their interpretations of them. So while religious Jews claim that they are “observing the Torah,” in actuality, based upon conflicts between the Torah and their Oral Law, they have been “halacha – walking” away from Yahowah, His Torah, and salvation for centuries.

Muhammad’s rhythmic recital, better known as the Qur’an (based upon the Hebrew word qara’ – to read and recite), repetitively claims to have “confirmed the Tawrat (a errant transliteration of towrah), the Zabur (a reference to the Davidic Psalms from a perversion of the Hebrew zamir, meaning “song”), and the Injeel (a corruption of the Greek euangelion, meaning “healing and beneficial message”)”—all in “perfect Arabic.” And yet, all of the Qur’an’s most important words are actually Hebrew or Greek, and it is those words which have been twisted to convey a message opposite of the one communicated in this Psalm. As such, whether or not God’s Towrah is reliable, Islam is not, because something which consistently contradicts that which it claims was inspired by God cannot be true.

Therefore, in a book thought by most to be religious, one claimed by three religions, the credibility of those same religions was destroyed by a single stroke. And perhaps this is the greatest irony of all.



* * *



These things considered, I appreciate the limitations of time. Most people haven’t studied the Torah, much less the underlying texts of the Babylonian, Egyptian, Greek, Roman, or ancient Chinese religions or the foundational sources for Hinduism, Judaism, Buddhism, Christianity, Islam, Mormonism, or Socialist Secular Humanism. You may not know, as I do, that these belief systems aren’t credible. But thankfully, it won’t matter. The moment you come to realize that Yahowah proved that His Scriptures (the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms) are inspired, trustworthy and true; all conflicting paths will become irrelevant. For that matter, so will all religions. And that’s because the God who inspired the prophets whose words we are going to study is too merciful to be tolerant of deception—no matter how enticing man’s words may seem, or how clever the counterfeits.

At this point, you may be wondering why I would be so openly critical of all religions, especially the religions of Judeo-Christianity, seeing that this is a multi-volume tome dedicated to the revelations of the God most believe was responsible for establishing these doctrines. Why am I insistent on ascribing a name to God? Why do I include Socialist Secular Humanism in the list of human belief systems? Why focus on prophetic verses as this enterprise does? Good questions all—and all questions God Himself will answer early and often.

By reading Yahowah you are going to find that much of what you have been led to believe isn’t true. Religious founders, clerics, and politicians have deceived you to empower and enrich themselves—most knowingly, many purposefully. It isn’t that everything they say is a lie; it’s that so many lies have been blended with the truth that what’s left is more poisonous than nurturing. And there is nothing more beguiling, destructive, or deadly than half-truths—deceptions which have been crafted to seem plausible—good counterfeits. The religions of Judaism and Christianity are prime examples of this strategy. Islam, on the other hand, is simply too inane to be credible—regardless of its feeble attempts to usurp the Torah’s credibility.

So that you might clean your mental slate, and be properly prepared for what you are about to read, understand that it is absolutely impossible for the religions of Christianity (Roman Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant, and Evangelical), Judaism, Islam (Sunni and Shi’a), or Mormonism to be reliable. Each of these religions claim that the “Bible” is the inspired word of God, and each draw their authority from it. And yet each of these religions conceal, change, convolute, contradict, criticize, curtail, and counterfeit (in hundreds of meaningful ways) the very testimony they claim was inspired, and upon which they claim to be based. Therefore, if Yahowah’s testimony is true, they are false based solely upon their variations from God’s actual revelation. But if Yahowah’s testimony is untrustworthy, then they are unreliable as well, because all of these religions claim to represent what would then be an unreliable deity—a reality which undermines their authority and credibility. It is thus impossible to be an informed and rational Catholic, Christian, Muslim, Mormon, or Halacha Jew. For this reason, it is foolish to trust these human religious schemes—no matter how they make you feel or how popular they have become.

If what Yahowah says is true, there is only one God, He has but one name, and there is only one path to Him. If what Yahowah says is true, nothing is more important than knowing what He revealed. Therefore, accurately presenting God’s Towrah testimony is the primary purpose of Yahowah—Who is God and What Does He Want.

The verdict you will ultimately be able to render on what is true and what is not, on what leads to life or to death, will soon be based upon considerably more accurate information than has been made available to you previously. Together, we are going to scrutinize the oldest Hebrew manuscripts of Yahowah’s Towrah, Prophets, and Psalms and consider the earliest Greek witnesses of Yahowsha’s (“Jesus’” actual name meaning “Yahowah Saves”) testimony. I will translate and amplify God’s revelations for you, just as I did with the Psalm cited in the seventh paragraph, using the best scholastic tools. (More on this in a moment.)

As we journey down this road, we will discover what God wants us to know about His nature, our purpose, and His plans, even His timeline. And in the process of closely examining His revelation, we will uncover something profound, perhaps even surprising: Yahowah wants us to enjoy an engaged yet relaxed, personal, conversational, upright, and familial relationship with Him. He wants to adopt us. God doesn’t want us to fear Him, to bow down to Him, or even to worship Him. He despises religions—all of them. He adores relationships and will sacrifice everything (save His integrity) to achieve them.

Now for a word of warning: these are long and challenging volumes. God is much smarter than we are, and His writing style is brilliantly majestic. He has woven a marvelous plot, one in which every detail is included for a reason, and one in which most every passage communicates on several levels simultaneously. His every word is a story in itself, and collectively they serve to flesh out the who, what, where, when, and how of the relationship our Heavenly Father seeks to develop with each of us. And yet, what Yahowah has to say is so contrary to many, if not most, of the things you have been taught, you will have to spend as much time unlearning as you do learning, especially if you want to know God as He really is.

To appreciate how everything relates to the ongoing story of our purpose and of our redemption, to understand how the provision Yahowah has delineated leads to the establishment of an eternal family, will require considerable time and an open mind. Your willingness in this regard will most likely determine the fate of your soul, as well as those you love. To form a relationship with God, to be saved by Him, you will first have to change your perspective, your attitude, and your thinking. And that my friends will be difficult, if not impossible, for those of you who consider yourselves religious.

I do not say these things because I have the market cornered on truth, but because I’ve come to recognize that most religious writers lead people away from what is true, and therefore, away from Yahowah. The reason religious scholars, pastors, and priests deceive is because their foundation is faulty. They not only base their revelations on grotesquely errant translations of Scripture, they embody the traditional religious milieu—a caustic brew based more upon Babylon than upon God’s Word. They do so to be accepted, and because it is good for business.

To know Yahowah, and to understand His plan of salvation, requires three things: a change in attitude, a different perspective, and judgmental thinking. Attitudinally, you are going to have to want to know Yahowah to the extent that you are willing to invest the time required to do so. And you are going to have to be willing to risk saying goodbye to people, institutions, and ideas you have held dear. Your perspective will have to change, so that you view Yahowah and His redemptive plan from the vantage point He provided and established—the Torah. And to properly evaluate right and wrong, to discriminate between truth and fiction, you will have to be judgmental and exercise your conscience—something the politically correct mantra has told you not to do.

More difficult still: for those who are religious, to walk with God they will have to walk away from their faith. And that is extremely difficult for most people, because it often means leaving one’s church, distancing oneself from social and religious customs, and abandoning the primary perspective from which they view the world around them—all the while irritating friends and family. The truth will prompt consternation over the fate of loved ones, while at the same time undermining the basic tenets of each individual’s religious and political beliefs.

For most, especially Christians, faith has become synonymous with religion, and belief is all that matters. And yet with God, these things are irrelevant, even counterproductive, because faith is nothing more than belief in the unknown. And belief is simply a religious substitute for evidence.

In opposition to faith and belief, Yahowah wants to be known, to be understood, to be trusted, and to be relied upon. This is the reason He encourages us to closely and carefully observe His Torah. It is why He revealed it and filled it with prophetic proclamations.

On this note, I have a confession to make. I have been asked many hundreds, perhaps even thousands, of times, to simplify and shorten Yada Yahweh. This, the seventh rewrite of what was once the opening chapter of its first of seven volumes, is designed to do one of those two things. I shall endeavor to condense the 3,000-page study of divine revelation found in the seven volumes of Yada Yahweh to one 300-page introductory book—Yahowah. But I cannot, and I will not, dumb down the text any more than it already is.

While Yada Yahweh is among the best-researched and most-accurate presentations of Yahowah’s Word, and while the many unique insights contained within it are especially relevant and revealing, it is but a pale reflection of God’s testimony. At the very least, the overall quantity of redeeming and affirming revelations contained within Yahowah’s Word, exceed my grasp by two or three magnitudes. So, since my best efforts to till the depths of God’s Word seldom reach much below the surface, at the very least, I owe it to you and to God, to share as much of His revelation as I am capable of understanding. And while that is admittedly a pittance compared to what is actually there, because I am flawed and relatively incompetent, it is the least I can do.

Yet in spite of my deficiencies, the richness of Yahowah’s Word is more than sufficient for you to know God, to appreciate the benefits of His Covenant, and to rely upon His plan of salvation. That is, so long as you are willing to open mind, so long as you are willing to walk away from religious and political affiliations, and so long as you are willing to invest the time.



* * *





Beryth – Familial Covenant Relationship…

I’ve just shared something very profound which I’d like to prove: Yahowah wants us to enjoy an engaged yet relaxed, personal, conversational, upright, and familial relationship with Him. He wants to adopt us. God doesn’t want us to fear Him, to bow down to Him, or even to worship Him. He despises religions—all of them. He adores relationships and will sacrifice everything (save His integrity) to achieve them.

Since these conclusions are contrary to the edicts of every religion, let’s turn to the evidence to ascertain whether or not they are valid. To begin, let’s start where Yahowah began, by asking Abraham to walk away from the most religious and political place on earth. Before God was willing to so much as share any aspect of His Covenant with the man who was then known as “Abram,” as a prerequisite to the relationship, he would first have to walk away from Babylon—Scripture’s metaphor for the beguiling and immoral nature of Satan’s religious, political, economic, and military schemes.

“Yahowah (YaHoWaH) said (‘amar – communicating) to (’el) ‘Abram (‘Abram – from ‘ab – father, and ruwm – to rise up and to be held in high esteem): ‘Walk out of (halak min – proceed away from, come out of, and journey from) your country (‘atah ‘erets – your land, place, realm and world in a regional sense) and away from (min) your relatives (‘atah moledeth – your kin and family, your birthplace and origins), and away from (min) your father’s (‘ab) house (bayith – home and household), to God’s (‘el – into the Mighty One’s) realm (‘erets – land, place, and country) which by relationship (‘asher) I will show you and provide (ra’ah – I will allow you to see, to inspect, to consider, and find delight in).” (Re’syth / Beginning / Genesis 12:1) To be adopted into God’s family, we must be willing to separate ourselves from the realm of man.

The Torah tells us that Yahowah was asking Abram to walk away from “the land of his birth, in Ur of the Chaldeans.” (Re’syth / Beginning / Genesis 11:28) It was poetic in a way. The Garden of Eden had been located at the source where the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers began, and Ur was situated at their mouth, where they discharged into the sea. On the Persian Gulf, Ur had served as the capitol of Sumer five hundred years before this conversation occurred, but now it had been incorporated into Chaldea—a name still used to describe Greater Babylonia. Inclusive of Sumer and Assyria, Babylon served as the birthplace of written language, and thus recorded history. The Babylonians and Assyrians were the first international merchants, and they built and deployed the most ruthless militaries to ever march. But most important of all, it was in Babylon that the counterfeit religious scheme Satan would deploy throughout the ages to undermine Yahowah’s testimony was first conceived. And it was in Ur that the integration of religion and politics was first used as a control mechanism.

Just as civilization flows from one end of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers to the other, from Eden to Ur, God’s conversation with mankind begins in “Bare’syth / In the Beginning / Genesis” and ends with the Revelation given to Yahowchanan (meaning Yah is Merciful, but corrupted over time to John). And everything in between, from Exodus to Yahowsha’s testimony recorded by His Disciples, is devoted to encouraging us to walk down the path Yahowah has provided from man’s immoral and oppressive world to the freedom of the perfect Shelter God has created for us.

Recognizing that our Heavenly Father, by way of His Covenant, has been offering to adopt us into His family for nearly four thousand years, all so that we can live forever with Him, it’s a bit surprising that Revelation concludes with Him still asking us to leave Babylon. What is also surprising is that even though it is obvious that Babylon is used as a metaphor for Satan’s beguiling and immoral religious, political, militaristic, and economic schemes, and that it is inseparable from Roman Catholicism, Islam, and Secular Humanism, mankind remains oblivious to God call—urging us, pleading with us, begging us to walk away from these damning abominations.

But before we consider the evidence linking Babylon—the place Yahowah asked Abraham and us to leave before engaging in a relationship with Him—with mankind’s demonic religious and political schemes, let’s consider His offer of acceptance. Continuing to speak to Abram in the next verse, Yahowah promised: “And I will work through you (‘asah – I will perform what needs to be done with you) to (la) increase and magnify (gadowl – to distinguish and elevate; from gadal – to grow, to empower, to lift up, to raise like a child, and do great things with) people (gowy – the aggregate human population irrespective of cultural, geographical, or racial differences).” (Re’syth / Beginning / Genesis 12:2)

This statement is normally translated: “And I will make you into a great nation.” But that is not the most accurate rendering of the text. Moreover, it doesn’t describe what actually happened, and it misses the purpose of the Covenant.

Abraham fathered Ishmael by way of an Egyptian slave and Yitzchaq by way of his wife Sarah. Ishmael has been lost to time, and isn’t the father of any nation. And while Yitzchaq’s son Ya’aqob became Yisra’el and heir to the Covenant, God never would have used gowy in reference to his descendants. Further, gowy is singular in the text, excluding the idea that the Covenant’s patriarch fathered multiple nations.

Turning to the words themselves, we discover that ‘asah, the Hebrew word denoting “work,” was prefixed in the first person singular (I) and was suffixed in the second person singular (you). Since Yahowah is speaking with Abram, God is promising to “work through” him “to do everything which is required to achieve the objective, to accomplish the task, to produce the desired result, and even celebrate what has been accomplished with” Abraham. Further, while “gowy – people” is usually translated “Gentile,” and may be rendered “nation,” it primary meaning depicts: “people from every race and place on earth.” And that makes “gadowl – to increase and magnify” the operative word in the text—and thus the objective and desired result. Based upon gadal, it describes “growth,” which is the residue of the Covenant for both God and man. By engaging in a relationship with Yahowah, we grow, as does He, becoming more than we would be bereft of the relationship. Further, by way of the Covenant constituted with Abraham, Yahowah has been able “to do...
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Richard  
#208 Posted : Tuesday, January 4, 2011 7:38:35 AM(UTC)
Richard
Joined: 1/19/2010(UTC)
Posts: 695
Man
United States

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 7 post(s)
I have been to the KGAB web site and cannot find those programs to download or to listen to on line. Can you provide me with the links?

Thanks.

Richard

Quote:
Hello Richard - I sent an email to Yada and this was his response:

I don't think KGAB has links to their archives anymore. But I would encourage people to use the contact us feature at the www.kgab.com website.

Yada

Edited by moderator Tuesday, January 4, 2011 9:33:35 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Offline lassie1865  
#209 Posted : Tuesday, January 4, 2011 9:13:58 AM(UTC)
lassie1865
Joined: 2/18/2008(UTC)
Posts: 309
Woman
Location: Colorado

Yada said he pasted 70 pages of his new introduction to YY here (Jan 4, 2011)? I copied what is posted here, but I can only seem to copy 7 pages . . . ??


Yahowah

…Who is God and What Does He Want?





Towrah – Instruction



‘Amar ‘eth ‘elohym – A Conversation With God…

Yahweh, or more precisely transliterated, Yahowah (pronounced using ‘Elowah – Almighty God and Towrah – Instructions as a guide), is God’s one and only name. Based upon the Hebrew verb hayah, God’s personal and proper name means: “I Am,” and “I Exist.” So now that we know His name, who is Yahowah, and what does He want?

To answer these questions, we have a lot of ground to cover. In order to appreciate what Yahowah had to say about Himself, and His relationship with us, many religious myths will have to be shattered, and new, fertile ground will need to be plowed. So in the pages which follow, we will pull the weeds of heresy. We will lay fallow false terminology, replacing it with God’s testimony. Through careful husbandry, we will cultivate an appreciation for God’s Word, and reveal the proper names and titles our Creator selected, and then explain how these were designed to be known and spoken. We will expose the sordid history of today’s bible translations and uncover the tools which can be used to accurately convey what God actually revealed.

In this prologue to the Torah, God’s foundational testimony comprised of BaRe’syth – In the Beginning (Genesis), Shemowth – Names (Exodus), Qara’ – Called-Out (Leviticus), BaMidbar – In the Wilderness (Numbers), and Dabarym – Words (Deuteronomy), we will examine Yahowah’s Instructions, consider His most sweeping prophecies relative to our salvation, and analyze what really happened during the three most important days in human history—Passover, Unleavened Bread, and FirstFruits in 33 CE. We will discuss who the Ma’aseyah Yahowsha’ really is (the diminished corporeal manifestation of Yahowah set-apart from Him to do the work required to save us), and who He is not (the Lord Jesus Christ). We will contemplate what He did (by observing, fulfilling, and enabling the Torah’s promises), and what He did not do (die on a cross to save us). We will detail the seven-step path Yahowah provided to enable us to live forever in His home as part of His family.

Since it is central to Yahowah’s purpose, the very reason for creating us, we will consider His Covenant, discussing what it actually represents, and then determine whether or not it has been changed or renewed. All along the way we will scrutinize the terminology Yahowah revealed under a microscope, amplifying His every word, so that we learn as much as possible. The overall portrait God has painted with words will be exposed from the perspective of the Artist’s finest brushstrokes.

Should you be able to endure this level of detail, should you be willing to invest the time required to examine all the connections and associations God has made, contemplating the symbols and metaphors which permeate His every thought, you will come to “yada’ – know” Yahowah. Should you be able to open your mind, to alter your perspective, and change your thinking, you will come to know God as He revealed Himself. What’s more, you will be properly prepared to capitalize upon the plan of salvation He Himself facilitated.

God will soon tell us that His Towrah delineates the means to salvation. But that is so contrary to the teachings of the Jewish, Christian, and Islamic religions, most will simply reject this reality, choosing instead to cling to the misguided tenets of their faith. For the religious, God’s Word will not be sufficient to free them from their beliefs. In fact, the onslaught of irrefutable evidence and unassailable logic God provides will be wasted on those beguiled by man’s religious schemes. Just as Jews disregard Moseh’s (Moses’) eye-opening sermons in favor of mind-numbing Rabbinical arguments, Christians disregard Yahowsha’s (errantly known as “Jesus’”) Sermon on the Mount in favor of Paul’s hopelessly conflicting epistles, and Muslims disregard the fact that Muhammad’s Qur’an is the antithesis of Yahowah’s Torah, most of those seeking God will be precluded from finding Him by their religions.

A thorough investigation of the evidence pertaining to mankind’s presence in the universe, and to an accurate understanding of God, leads to an inescapable conclusion: the Scripture Yahowah inspired—His Torah, Prophets, and Psalms—remains the world’s only rational candidate for divine writ. Now, I don’t expect you to concur with me, or Him, in this regard, seeing as you are reading the seventh paragraph of a three-hundred-page book introducing a three-thousand-page review of Yahowah’s testimony, but I have no doubt that, somewhere along this journey, those of you who are intellectually honest will render a similar verdict. Frankly, the case Yahowah makes on behalf of His revelation is so compelling; I’m amazed most people continue to stumble in the dark.

As evidence of God’s position on this issue, please consider the following introduction to amplified Scripture: “Yahowah’s (YaHoWaH’s) Towrah (towrah – authorized directions, law, instruction, and prescription for living) is complete and entirely perfect (tamym – without defect, lacking nothing, correct, sound, genuine, right, helpful, healing, beneficial, and true), returning, restoring, and transforming (suwb – turning around and bringing back) the soul (nepesh – our consciousness). Yahowah’s (YaHoWaH’s) testimony (‘eduwth – and witness) is trustworthy and reliable (‘aman – verifiable, confirming, supportive, and establishing), making understanding and obtaining wisdom (hakam – educating and enlightening to the point of comprehension) simple for the open-minded (pethy).” (Psalm 19:7)

According to God, the means to understanding, even to wisdom, as well as to the restoration of our soul, is to trust Yahowah’s testimony”—which is found in the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms (Writings). So that is where we will focus our attention, seeking to determine whether or not God’s witness can in fact be relied upon. Can we trust what He has to say? After all, according to this passage, so long as we are open minded, that is to say so long as we are receptive to what He has to say, such proof should be easy to find.

And that is why, even in this Prologue to the Towrah I’m going to endeavor to use God’s Word to describe the foundation He Himself established, and thereby communicate an entirely different perspective from which to consider the evidence—one which will enable you to actually know and understand Yahowah and His plan of salvation. By the time you have reached its conclusion, you will become acquainted with many things, including: the challenges inherent in translation, the history and corruption of the textual witness, as well as the emergence of counterfeit names, words, titles, and rituals. But more than this, you will be given a window into the mind of God, and come, perhaps for the first time, to understand His nature, His purpose, His timing, and His plan—especially as it pertains to the creation of a Covenant—a personal and familial relationship where we are invited to walk with, to talk with, and to be upright in the presence of God Himself. In these pages you will discover the extraordinary means God deployed so that we might camp out with Him for all eternity.

Speaking of perspective, lurking beneath the surface of the 19th Psalm is a corollary which should not be missed. The Towrah’s ability to transform and renew souls is predicated upon understanding Yahowah’s Word. And while He stated that “enlightenment and comprehension” would be “simple for those who are open” to His message, that will not come easy to those whose minds have been closed by religious beliefs—as faith repels evidence of its failings. Therefore, if God can be trusted, your salvation will be predicated upon your attitude and your thinking. I hope that you are up for this challenge.

Recognizing that three out of every four people living today, some five billion Christians, Muslims, and Secular Humanists, have been conditioned to believe that the Torah is no longer pertinent, and that it has been superseded by more modern approaches to life, I’d be remiss if I didn’t encourage you to contemplate the ramifications of what was just revealed. By stating that “Yahowah’s Towrah is complete and perfect,” that “the Towrah” is responsible for “restoring our soul, transforming us,” and by saying that “Yahowah’s…testimony is trustworthy and reliable,” even “easy to understand,” God undermined the foundations of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam with a single statement. He contradicted the messages delivered by the Apostle Paul (that the Torah was obsolete and cannot save), by Rabbi Akiba (that rabbis must interpret the Torah using their Oral Law), and by the Prophet Muhammad (that the Qur’an (which is the antithesis of the Towrah) is God’s first, last, and perfect revelation). The very God all three of these men used to justify their authority, the God they all claimed to speak on behalf of, told us not to believe them.

This is an astonishing observation, so let’s linger here a moment longer. Paul, who sought to be a rabbi, wrote Galatians and Romans (his first and sixth letters) for the express purpose of convincing his audience that the Torah was now obsolete, that the Torah was a cruel taskmaster which enslaved, that God’s Law was of the flesh, that Yahowah’s instructions should be ignored, and that this Torah never had the power to save anyone. And it was upon these letters that the religion of Christianity was conceived. And yet based upon this statement from Yahowah (and many others like it), one affirmed by the Ma’aseyah Yahowsha’ (the correct title and name for “Jesus Christ”) in His Sermon on the Mount, Paul lied, and therefore cannot be trusted. And without Paul’s letters, there is no “New Testament,” no “Gospel of Grace,” no “salvation by faith.” Simply stated: Christianity dies with Paul—a man whose doctrine God just refuted. I don’t share this with you to make you angry, but in hopes that Christian readers might be able to cleanse their mental slate, or at least realize that it may require some scrubbing, because the only informed and rational conclusion which can be drawn from this passage is that Paul’s letters were not inspired and are not reliable. (For more on this, I encourage you to visit and read: www.QuestioningPaul.com.)

“Yahowah’s Torah” is comprised of God’s “prescriptions for living,” His “authorized directions.” It “lacks nothing,” which would include the means to our salvation. The Torah is “beneficial and healing,” which is particularly telling when one considers that the Greek euangelion (which has been errantly rendered “Gospel”) literally means: “beneficial and healing message.” Based upon the Psalm, God’s Word is unchanged from beginning to end. Especially relevant in this regard is the fact that the purpose of Yahowah’s Torah is to “restore and transform our soul” so that we can “return” to Him. It makes the Torah the eternal path to God.

In due time, we shall discover something astonishing: the Way to God is presented in the heart of the Torah. This path is comprised of a seven-step plan whereby Yahowah Himself provided the means to eternal life through the promises contained in His seven “Mow’ed Miqra’ey – Called-Out Assembly Meetings. Our salvation begins with “Pesach – Passover” and culminates in “Sukah – Shelters,” where we are invited to camp out with our Heavenly Father.

I realize that this view is astonishingly unpopular, and totally unfamiliar, but ought not God’s opinion on this issue matter more than humankind’s—no matter how many religious people there are who oppose His view? Simply stated, if God used prophecy to prove that He exists, and that He inspired the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms, as this book will affirm, then who are we to contradict Him?

While this Psalm serves as a wholesale repudiation of Pauline Doctrine and thus of Christianity, it wasn’t the only religion impaled by Yahowah’s Word—just the first. Rabbi Akiba’s Rabbinic and Pharisaic Judaism, which is the surviving form of the religion codified by Maimonides and practiced today, was predicated on the notion that the pronunciation of God’s name was unknown, that it should never be spoken, that His Torah was not complete which necessitated their Oral Law, that they, not He, controlled the fate of Jewish souls. They professed that the only way to understand their nameless god’s rules was to rely upon their interpretations of them. So while religious Jews claim that they are “observing the Torah,” in actuality, based upon conflicts between the Torah and their Oral Law, they have been “halacha – walking” away from Yahowah, His Torah, and salvation for centuries.

Muhammad’s rhythmic recital, better known as the Qur’an (based upon the Hebrew word qara’ – to read and recite), repetitively claims to have “confirmed the Tawrat (a errant transliteration of towrah), the Zabur (a reference to the Davidic Psalms from a perversion of the Hebrew zamir, meaning “song”), and the Injeel (a corruption of the Greek euangelion, meaning “healing and beneficial message”)”—all in “perfect Arabic.” And yet, all of the Qur’an’s most important words are actually Hebrew or Greek, and it is those words which have been twisted to convey a message opposite of the one communicated in this Psalm. As such, whether or not God’s Towrah is reliable, Islam is not, because something which consistently contradicts that which it claims was inspired by God cannot be true.

Therefore, in a book thought by most to be religious, one claimed by three religions, the credibility of those same religions was destroyed by a single stroke. And perhaps this is the greatest irony of all.



* * *



These things considered, I appreciate the limitations of time. Most people haven’t studied the Torah, much less the underlying texts of the Babylonian, Egyptian, Greek, Roman, or ancient Chinese religions or the foundational sources for Hinduism, Judaism, Buddhism, Christianity, Islam, Mormonism, or Socialist Secular Humanism. You may not know, as I do, that these belief systems aren’t credible. But thankfully, it won’t matter. The moment you come to realize that Yahowah proved that His Scriptures (the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms) are inspired, trustworthy and true; all conflicting paths will become irrelevant. For that matter, so will all religions. And that’s because the God who inspired the prophets whose words we are going to study is too merciful to be tolerant of deception—no matter how enticing man’s words may seem, or how clever the counterfeits.

At this point, you may be wondering why I would be so openly critical of all religions, especially the religions of Judeo-Christianity, seeing that this is a multi-volume tome dedicated to the revelations of the God most believe was responsible for establishing these doctrines. Why am I insistent on ascribing a name to God? Why do I include Socialist Secular Humanism in the list of human belief systems? Why focus on prophetic verses as this enterprise does? Good questions all—and all questions God Himself will answer early and often.

By reading Yahowah you are going to find that much of what you have been led to believe isn’t true. Religious founders, clerics, and politicians have deceived you to empower and enrich themselves—most knowingly, many purposefully. It isn’t that everything they say is a lie; it’s that so many lies have been blended with the truth that what’s left is more poisonous than nurturing. And there is nothing more beguiling, destructive, or deadly than half-truths—deceptions which have been crafted to seem plausible—good counterfeits. The religions of Judaism and Christianity are prime examples of this strategy. Islam, on the other hand, is simply too inane to be credible—regardless of its feeble attempts to usurp the Torah’s credibility.

So that you might clean your mental slate, and be properly prepared for what you are about to read, understand that it is absolutely impossible for the religions of Christianity (Roman Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant, and Evangelical), Judaism, Islam (Sunni and Shi’a), or Mormonism to be reliable. Each of these religions claim that the “Bible” is the inspired word of God, and each draw their authority from it. And yet each of these religions conceal, change, convolute, contradict, criticize, curtail, and counterfeit (in hundreds of meaningful ways) the very testimony they claim was inspired, and upon which they claim to be based. Therefore, if Yahowah’s testimony is true, they are false based solely upon their variations from God’s actual revelation. But if Yahowah’s testimony is untrustworthy, then they are unreliable as well, because all of these religions claim to represent what would then be an unreliable deity—a reality which undermines their authority and credibility. It is thus impossible to be an informed and rational Catholic, Christian, Muslim, Mormon, or Halacha Jew. For this reason, it is foolish to trust these human religious schemes—no matter how they make you feel or how popular they have become.

If what Yahowah says is true, there is only one God, He has but one name, and there is only one path to Him. If what Yahowah says is true, nothing is more important than knowing what He revealed. Therefore, accurately presenting God’s Towrah testimony is the primary purpose of Yahowah—Who is God and What Does He Want.

The verdict you will ultimately be able to render on what is true and what is not, on what leads to life or to death, will soon be based upon considerably more accurate information than has been made available to you previously. Together, we are going to scrutinize the oldest Hebrew manuscripts of Yahowah’s Towrah, Prophets, and Psalms and consider the earliest Greek witnesses of Yahowsha’s (“Jesus’” actual name meaning “Yahowah Saves”) testimony. I will translate and amplify God’s revelations for you, just as I did with the Psalm cited in the seventh paragraph, using the best scholastic tools. (More on this in a moment.)

As we journey down this road, we will discover what God wants us to know about His nature, our purpose, and His plans, even His timeline. And in the process of closely examining His revelation, we will uncover something profound, perhaps even surprising: Yahowah wants us to enjoy an engaged yet relaxed, personal, conversational, upright, and familial relationship with Him. He wants to adopt us. God doesn’t want us to fear Him, to bow down to Him, or even to worship Him. He despises religions—all of them. He adores relationships and will sacrifice everything (save His integrity) to achieve them.

Now for a word of warning: these are long and challenging volumes. God is much smarter than we are, and His writing style is brilliantly majestic. He has woven a marvelous plot, one in which every detail is included for a reason, and one in which most every passage communicates on several levels simultaneously. His every word is a story in itself, and collectively they serve to flesh out the who, what, where, when, and how of the relationship our Heavenly Father seeks to develop with each of us. And yet, what Yahowah has to say is so contrary to many, if not most, of the things you have been taught, you will have to spend as much time unlearning as you do learning, especially if you want to know God as He really is.

To appreciate how everything relates to the ongoing story of our purpose and of our redemption, to understand how the provision Yahowah has delineated leads to the establishment of an eternal family, will require considerable time and an open mind. Your willingness in this regard will most likely determine the fate of your soul, as well as those you love. To form a relationship with God, to be saved by Him, you will first have to change your perspective, your attitude, and your thinking. And that my friends will be difficult, if not impossible, for those of you who consider yourselves religious.

I do not say these things because I have the market cornered on truth, but because I’ve come to recognize that most religious writers lead people away from what is true, and therefore, away from Yahowah. The reason religious scholars, pastors, and priests deceive is because their foundation is faulty. They not only base their revelations on grotesquely errant translations of Scripture, they embody the traditional religious milieu—a caustic brew based more upon Babylon than upon God’s Word. They do so to be accepted, and because it is good for business.

To know Yahowah, and to understand His plan of salvation, requires three things: a change in attitude, a different perspective, and judgmental thinking. Attitudinally, you are going to have to want to know Yahowah to the extent that you are willing to invest the time required to do so. And you are going to have to be willing to risk saying goodbye to people, institutions, and ideas you have held dear. Your perspective will have to change, so that you view Yahowah and His redemptive plan from the vantage point He provided and established—the Torah. And to properly evaluate right and wrong, to discriminate between truth and fiction, you will have to be judgmental and exercise your conscience—something the politically correct mantra has told you not to do.

More difficult still: for those who are religious, to walk with God they will have to walk away from their faith. And that is extremely difficult for most people, because it often means leaving one’s church, distancing oneself from social and religious customs, and abandoning the primary perspective from which they view the world around them—all the while irritating friends and family. The truth will prompt consternation over the fate of loved ones, while at the same time undermining the basic tenets of each individual’s religious and political beliefs.

For most, especially Christians, faith has become synonymous with religion, and belief is all that matters. And yet with God, these things are irrelevant, even counterproductive, because faith is nothing more than belief in the unknown. And belief is simply a religious substitute for evidence.

In opposition to faith and belief, Yahowah wants to be known, to be understood, to be trusted, and to be relied upon. This is the reason He encourages us to closely and carefully observe His Torah. It is why He revealed it and filled it with prophetic proclamations.

On this note, I have a confession to make. I have been asked many hundreds, perhaps even thousands, of times, to simplify and shorten Yada Yahweh. This, the seventh rewrite of what was once the opening chapter of its first of seven volumes, is designed to do one of those two things. I shall endeavor to condense the 3,000-page study of divine revelation found in the seven volumes of Yada Yahweh to one 300-page introductory book—Yahowah. But I cannot, and I will not, dumb down the text any more than it already is.

While Yada Yahweh is among the best-researched and most-accurate presentations of Yahowah’s Word, and while the many unique insights contained within it are especially relevant and revealing, it is but a pale reflection of God’s testimony. At the very least, the overall quantity of redeeming and affirming revelations contained within Yahowah’s Word, exceed my grasp by two or three magnitudes. So, since my best efforts to till the depths of God’s Word seldom reach much below the surface, at the very least, I owe it to you and to God, to share as much of His revelation as I am capable of understanding. And while that is admittedly a pittance compared to what is actually there, because I am flawed and relatively incompetent, it is the least I can do.

Yet in spite of my deficiencies, the richness of Yahowah’s Word is more than sufficient for you to know God, to appreciate the benefits of His Covenant, and to rely upon His plan of salvation. That is, so long as you are willing to open mind, so long as you are willing to walk away from religious and political affiliations, and so long as you are willing to invest the time.



* * *





Beryth – Familial Covenant Relationship…

I’ve just shared something very profound which I’d like to prove: Yahowah wants us to enjoy an engaged yet relaxed, personal, conversational, upright, and familial relationship with Him. He wants to adopt us. God doesn’t want us to fear Him, to bow down to Him, or even to worship Him. He despises religions—all of them. He adores relationships and will sacrifice everything (save His integrity) to achieve them.

Since these conclusions are contrary to the edicts of every religion, let’s turn to the evidence to ascertain whether or not they are valid. To begin, let’s start where Yahowah began, by asking Abraham to walk away from the most religious and political place on earth. Before God was willing to so much as share any aspect of His Covenant with the man who was then known as “Abram,” as a prerequisite to the relationship, he would first have to walk away from Babylon—Scripture’s metaphor for the beguiling and immoral nature of Satan’s religious, political, economic, and military schemes.

“Yahowah (YaHoWaH) said (‘amar – communicating) to (’el) ‘Abram (‘Abram – from ‘ab – father, and ruwm – to rise up and to be held in high esteem): ‘Walk out of (halak min – proceed away from, come out of, and journey from) your country (‘atah ‘erets – your land, place, realm and world in a regional sense) and away from (min) your relatives (‘atah moledeth – your kin and family, your birthplace and origins), and away from (min) your father’s (‘ab) house (bayith – home and household), to God’s (‘el – into the Mighty One’s) realm (‘erets – land, place, and country) which by relationship (‘asher) I will show you and provide (ra’ah – I will allow you to see, to inspect, to consider, and find delight in).” (Re’syth / Beginning / Genesis 12:1) To be adopted into God’s family, we must be willing to separate ourselves from the realm of man.

The Torah tells us that Yahowah was asking Abram to walk away from “the land of his birth, in Ur of the Chaldeans.” (Re’syth / Beginning / Genesis 11:28) It was poetic in a way. The Garden of Eden had been located at the source where the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers began, and Ur was situated at their mouth, where they discharged into the sea. On the Persian Gulf, Ur had served as the capitol of Sumer five hundred years before this conversation occurred, but now it had been incorporated into Chaldea—a name still used to describe Greater Babylonia. Inclusive of Sumer and Assyria, Babylon served as the birthplace of written language, and thus recorded history. The Babylonians and Assyrians were the first international merchants, and they built and deployed the most ruthless militaries to ever march. But most important of all, it was in Babylon that the counterfeit religious scheme Satan would deploy throughout the ages to undermine Yahowah’s testimony was first conceived. And it was in Ur that the integration of religion and politics was first used as a control mechanism.

Just as civilization flows from one end of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers to the other, from Eden to Ur, God’s conversation with mankind begins in “Bare’syth / In the Beginning / Genesis” and ends with the Revelation given to Yahowchanan (meaning Yah is Merciful, but corrupted over time to John). And everything in between, from Exodus to Yahowsha’s testimony recorded by His Disciples, is devoted to encouraging us to walk down the path Yahowah has provided from man’s immoral and oppressive world to the freedom of the perfect Shelter God has created for us.

Recognizing that our Heavenly Father, by way of His Covenant, has been offering to adopt us into His family for nearly four thousand years, all so that we can live forever with Him, it’s a bit surprising that Revelation concludes with Him still asking us to leave Babylon. What is also surprising is that even though it is obvious that Babylon is used as a metaphor for Satan’s beguiling and immoral religious, political, militaristic, and economic schemes, and that it is inseparable from Roman Catholicism, Islam, and Secular Humanism, mankind remains oblivious to God call—urging us, pleading with us, begging us to walk away from these damning abominations.

But before we consider the evidence linking Babylon—the place Yahowah asked Abraham and us to leave before engaging in a relationship with Him—with mankind’s demonic religious and political schemes, let’s consider His offer of acceptance. Continuing to speak to Abram in the next verse, Yahowah promised: “And I will work through you (‘asah – I will perform what needs to be done with you) to (la) increase and magnify (gadowl – to distinguish and elevate; from gadal – to grow, to empower, to lift up, to raise like a child, and do great things with) people (gowy – the aggregate human population irrespective of cultural, geographical, or racial differences).” (Re’syth / Beginning / Genesis 12:2)

This statement is normally translated: “And I will make you into a great nation.” But that is not the most accurate rendering of the text. Moreover, it doesn’t describe what actually happened, and it misses the purpose of the Covenant.

Abraham fathered Ishmael by way of an Egyptian slave and Yitzchaq by way of his wife Sarah. Ishmael has been lost to time, and isn’t the father of any nation. And while Yitzchaq’s son Ya’aqob became Yisra’el and heir to the Covenant, God never would have used gowy in reference to his descendants. Further, gowy is singular in the text, excluding the idea that the Covenant’s patriarch fathered multiple nations.

Turning to the words themselves, we discover that ‘asah, the Hebrew word denoting “work,” was prefixed in the first person singular (I) and was suffixed in the second person singular (you). Since Yahowah is speaking with Abram, God is promising to “work through” him “to do everything which is required to achieve the objective, to accomplish the task, to produce the desired result, and even celebrate what has been accomplished with” Abraham. Further, while “gowy – people” is usually translated “Gentile,” and may be rendered “nation,” it primary meaning depicts: “people from every race and place on earth.” And that makes “gadowl – to increase and magnify” the operative word in the text—and thus the objective and desired result. Based upon gadal, it describes “growth,” which is the residue of the Covenant for both God and man. By engaging in a relationship with Yahowah, we grow, as does He, becoming more than we would be bereft of the relationship. Further, by way of the Covenant constituted with Abraham, Yahowah has been able “to do great things with people, empowering us, elevating us, and raising us like children” so that we can live in His presence. God enjoys our company. He loves doing things with us. He adores His growing family.

But the most ironic, and indeed least appreciated, aspect of the Covenant is that God lowers Himself to lift us up—not unlike a loving father getting down on his knees to carefully lift a child up to his level. Listen: “And I will kneel down in love, lowering Myself to bless you (barak – I will bow down, diminishing Myself to mercifully favor you).” (Re’syth / Beginning / Genesis 12:2) With barak prefixed with the conjunction “and,” and the first person singular pronoun “I,” in addition to being suffixed with the second person singular pronoun “you,” it is a complete sentence.

While barak is usually translated “bless” in this context, the primary meaning of the word coveys a vastly more important truth. Barak depicts someone “kneeling down in adoration, diminishing and lowering themselves out of love.” So while religious man is wont to bow down to God, and lift Him up with praise, God is committed to diminishing Himself so that He can elevate the men and women who choose to engage in a relationship with Him. There may not be any truth more profound than this.

And indeed, Yahowsha’ is literally the diminished manifestation of God, Yahowah on His knees, and figuratively, the Ma’aseyah represents God lowering Himself to lift us up. He did this very thing when He fulfilled the Called-Out Assembly of Unleavened Bread—His soul descending into She’owl so that our redeemed and reconciled souls might rise up to heaven.

Even though the concept of God bowing down to lift us up is the antithesis of what...
File Attachment(s):
Towrah.doc (254kb) downloaded 64 time(s).
Offline Kiwifruit  
#210 Posted : Tuesday, January 4, 2011 10:55:27 AM(UTC)
Kiwifruit
Joined: 2/12/2008(UTC)
Posts: 9
Man
Location: New Zealand

Hi Yada,

It has been a month or more since I last logged into the forum. I see you are now preferring Yahowah/Yahowsha' over Yahuweh/Yahushua. When did you come to the realisation that His name is Yahowah over Yahuweh? Sorry if the question has been asked and answered already.

As an aside, I have been replying to Ken's daily inspirations as he presents them on his facebook site. He is still an advocate of old Sha'uwl in denial of the evidence.

Yahuweh's/Yahowah's blessings
David Crawford
Yahudikiwi

I put the question to Yada. Here is his response:

Quote:
Here is the answer to the question as to why I now use Yahowah and Yahowsha'. The evidence has convinced me that I was wrong to use Yahweh and Yahshua. Here's why...


Those who promote the myth that God’s name isn’t known, that it isn’t important, and that it cannot and should not be pronounced, stop reading at this verse. But God was not finished speaking… “God (‘elohym), moreover (‘owd – besides this and in addition), said (‘amar – declared) to (‘el) Moseh, ‘You shall say (‘amar) this (koh) to (‘el) the Children of Yisra’el (yisra’el – individuals who strive and struggle with, those who persist and endure with, those who persevere with and are empowered by God), “Yahowah (י ה ו ה), God (‘elohym) of your fathers (‘ab), God of ‘Abraham, God of Yitzchaq, and God of Ya’aqob, sent (salah) me (‘any) to (‘el) you (‘atem).” This (zeh) is My (‘any) personal and proper name (shem) forever (la ‘olam – for all time and into eternity). This (zeh) is My (‘any) way of being known and remembered (zeker – My way of being mentioned and recalled, My commemoration and memorial, the inheritance right, symbol, sign, and signature) in all dwelling places, homes (dowr) times, and generations (dowr).’” (Shemowth / Exodus 3:15)

So, pray tell, how does anyone justify calling God “Lord” when God said as clearly as words allow: “My name is Yahowah. That is the way I want to be recalled, the way I want to be known, and the way I want to be remembered. Yahowah is My signature. Tell those who want to live with Me, those who want to be saved by Me, that Yahowah has sent you.” Know it, say it, remember it.

Now that we have allowed God to resolve the myth that He has many names, some of which are too sacred to be spoken, what about the myth that no one knows how to pronounce the “Tetragrammaton,” or “four consonants” which comprise His signature.

To begin, Yahowah’s name is comprised of vowels, not consonants. Flavius Josephus, the most famous of all Jewish historians, wrote in the 1st-century CE, in his The War of the Jews, Book 5.5.7: “…the set apart name, it consists of four vowels.” Weingreen, a noted scholar in Hebrew grammar, subsequently stated in 1959 for Oxford University Press: “Long before the introduction of vowels signs it was felt that the main vowel sounds should be indicated in writing, and so the three letters, Waw (ו), He (ה), and Yod (י) were used to represent long vowels.”

In actuality, the easiest way to dispense with the “consonant” myth in early Hebrew is to examine the thousands upon thousands of words which contain the letters Waw (ו), He (ה), and Yod (י), and consider how they are pronounced. Almost invariably, the Waw (ו) conveys the vowel sounds “o,” “oo,” or “u.” In this regard it is similar to the vowel form of the English W, pronounced “double u.” The He (ה) is pronounced “ah” and to a significantly lesser degree, “eh.” The Yod (י) communicates an “i” sound, and is otherwise similar to the vocalization of the vowel form of the English Y. In reality, these three vowels, in conjunction with the Hebrew Aleph (א) and Ayin (ע), made it possible to pronounce every Hebrew word several millennia before the Sheva System was developed or vowel points were introduced by the Masoretes.

With this in mind, let’s examine the three vowels which comprise Yahowah’s name. Perhaps the most familiar Hebrew word known to us today beginning with the letter Yod (י) is “yada’ (יָדַע),” meaning “to know.” You often hear it repeated: “yada, yada, yada.” Indirectly, we know the Yod sound from Israel, which is a transliteration of Yisra’el. But it is also the source of the vowel I/i in: Isaiah (Yasha’yah), Messiah (Ma’aseyah), Zechariah (Zakaryahuw), Hezekiah (Chazayah), Nehemiah (Nachemyah), and Moriah (Mowriyah).

Those who have sung “kumbaya (quwmbayah (stand with Yah))” or “hallelujah (halalyah (radiate Yah’s light))” know this Yod (י) sound as well. The י provides the vowel sound for the common Hebrew words yad – hand, yadah – to acknowledge, yatab – good, and yahad – becoming united.

There are literally thousands of Hebrew words were the Yod (י) is pronounced just like the Y/y is in the English words: “yes, yet, yield, yarn, yaw, yawn, yawl, yea, yippee, year, yearn, yeast, yell, yellow, yelp, yeoman, yesterday, you, young, yolk, yonder, and yummy. And just like Hebrew, in English, the letter Y is often a vowel. Consider: “myth, hymn, my, fly, and cry.” In fact, according to the Oxford Dictionary, “the letter Y is probably more often used as a vowel. And in this role it is often interchangeable with the letter I.” This similarity to Hebrew is not a coincidence, because Hebrew served as the world’s first actual alphabet—a word derived from a transliteration of the first two letters of the Hebrew alphabet: Aleph and Bet.

The second and fourth letter in Yahowah’s name is the Hebrew He (ה). Curious as to how Yahowah’s name could be based upon hayah (היה), which begins and ends with ה, and yet most often be transliterated “Yahweh,” where the first He is pronounced “ah,” and the second is pronounced “eh,” I examined every Hebrew word inclusive of the letter ה – especially those words concluding with He. What I discovered is that just like hayah and ‘elohym (meaning “God,” from ‘elowah) the Hebrew ה is almost invariably pronounced “ah.” In fact the ratio of “ah” to “eh” was nearly one hundred to one. So in hayah, Yahowah told us how to pronounce all but one letter of His name.

And yet, in the definitive statement “’elowah hayah – God exists,” all of our questions are answered. We can simply look to the title Yahowah selected for Himself in this revealing discussion, “‘elohym (אלהים) – God,” to ascertain how to properly pronounce the Hebrew vowel Waw (ו). You see, ‘elohym is the contracted, and thus less formal, plural, and thus more inclusive, form of ‘elowah (אלוה) – “God Almighty.” And it is in ‘elowah (אלוה) that we find definitive proof of how to properly communicate the Hebrew ו. Similarly, the title Rabbis pointed with the first common singular suffix to read ‘adoni and/or ‘adona(y), so that they could replace Yahowah’s name with a title commonly ascribed to men, was derived from ‘adown (אָדוֹן).

But there is another, perhaps even better known, Hebrew word which can assist us. Scripture’s most often transliterated title, “towrah – Torah,” meaning “instructions,” provides all the direction we require to properly pronounce the Hebrew Waw (ו) specifically, and YHWH generally. In the Divine Writ, this title for “law, instruction, and prescription” is written TWRH (right to left as: תּוֹרָה), where the “o” sound is derived from the ו. In addition, the most oft’ repeated Hebrew word over the last one hundred generations has been “shalowm (שָׁלֹום) – peace,” where once again, we are greeted with the means to properly pronounce the Hebrew ו.

Other familiar Hebrew words which are pronounced similarly include: gowym – people (specifically Gentiles), yowm – meaning day, ‘adown – master, ‘owy – alas, ‘owr – light, ‘owth – sign, qowl – voice, towb – good, ‘acharown – last days, and of course ‘elowah – God, in addition to the names: Aaron, Jonah, Job, Judah, Moriah, Zion, and Jerusalem from ‘Aharown, Yownah, Yowb, Yahuwdah, Mowriyah, Tsyown, and Yaruwshalaym.

Beyond towrah and ‘elowah (God’s revealed instructions and title), there are forty extremely important reminders conveyed throughout the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms which serve to affirm that God’s name was pronounced Yahowah, not Yahuweh or Yahweh. While two of these, Yowb – Job and Yownah – Jonah, were shared previously, I omitted their meanings and etymology. Virtually every credible lexicon affirms that the “Yow” sound in both names is a contraction of “Yahow.” As such, Yownah – Jonah means: “Yahowah is the Dove (a symbol for the Spirit of God).” Yowb – Job is: “Cry Out to Yahowah.” But there are more.

The most famous of these is Yowceph – Joseph, meaning “Yah Unites and Multiplies.” The most important is Yowbel – Jubilee, designating the year after seven Shabat of years, where “Yah’s Godly Lamb” frees us by forgiving our debts. Every important fulfillment on Yahowah’s calendar commences not just on Yowbel years of Freedom and Redemption, but on multiples of forty Yowbel. These include 1967 BCE (2000 years after the expulsion of Adam from the Garden) when Yahowah affirmed His Covenant with Abraham on Mount Mowriyah. Forty Yowbel thereafter (in 33 CE) Yahowsha’ fulfilled Passover, Unleavened Bread, and First Fruits on the same mountain. And finally, forty Yowbel removed from His sacrifice (upcoming in 2033), Yahowsha’ will return to Mount Mowriyah on the Day of Reconciliations in anticipation of celebrating the Festival Feast of Shelters for one thousand years during the Millennial Sabbath.

Names which continue to echo “Yahow” today include: Yow’ab – Joab (Yah is our Father), Yow’ach – Joah (Related to Yah), Yow’achaz – Joahaz (Grasp Hold of Yah), Yow’el – Joel (Yah is God), Yowb – Job (Cry Out to Yah), Yowchanan – Johanan (Yah is Merciful), Yownah – Jonah (Yah’s Dove), Yownatan – Jonathan (Yah Gives), Yowceph – Joseph (Yah Unites and Multiplies), Yowram – Joram (Yah Uplifts), and Yowtham – Jotham (Yah Perfects).

Therefore, the obvious pronunciation of YHWH, written right to left in Hebrew ה ו ה י, is YaH·oW·aH. Mystery solved.

Since it bears repeating, the reason I occasionally write Yahweh in my commentary, and why the seven-volume tome I’m introducing here with Yahowah, remains titled Yada Yahweh, is access. The overwhelming majority of people who use search engines to find accurate information about God type “Yahweh,” because Yahowah is unfamiliar to them. So if I did not intersperse this spelling along with the more precise transliteration, far fewer people interested in knowing Yahowah would have access to these insights. Further, since Yahowah routinely uses contractions of His name, including Yah, Yahow, Yahuw, and Yow, His Towrah affirms that He is not the least bit bothered by an incomplete or inexact pronunciation. What He is concerned about is that we know He has but one name, that we know what that name is, and that we use it.

Now that we understand the most important name in the universe, let’s turn our attention to the second: Yahowsha’ – or sometimes transliterated Yahuwshuwa’, or simply Yahushua and even Yahshua. (The alternative ending (shuwa’ versus sha’) is derived from Deuteronomy 3:21 and Judges 2:7, where we find יְהוֹשׁוּעַ, as opposed to יְהוֹשֻׁעַ.) This name is as equal parts an identity designation as it is a mission statement. As a compound of Yahowah’s name and yasha’, the Hebrew word for “salvation and deliverance,” Yahowsha’ tells us that Yahowah Himself is engaged in the process of saving us.

As for the name “Jesus,” which is more familiar to you, it is important to note that it cannot be found anywhere in God’s Word. As a matter of fact, there was and is no J in the Hebrew alphabet—nor one in Greek or Latin. The letter was not invented until the mid 16th-century, precluding anyone named “Jesus” existing prior to that time.

The letter J was first introduced by the Italian Renaissance humanist and grammarian, Gian Giorgio Trissino, who, while studying Latin texts in 1524, wrote Trissino’s Epistle about the Letters Recently Added in the Italian Language, to advocate the enrichment of Italian by using Greek characters to better distinguish between various sounds. His recommendations were universally ignored, save the modern distinction between the U and V as well as the letter I versus what would eventually become a J. In the aftermath of Trissino’s writings, his J was pronounced similarly to the Y in yet. But by the 17th-century, first in France (with the word junta), then in Germany and England, a new, harder sound, similar to the J in jet emerged, some say in association with Trissino’s Epistle.

The first English book to make a clear distinction between the I and J was published in 1634, where the new letter débuted on loan words from other languages, specifically Hallelujah rather than Halleluyah. (For those who relish dates, you may have noticed that 1634 is twenty-three years after the first edition of what was then called “The King Iames Bible” was printed in 1611. In it, Yahowsha’ was called “Iesous.”)

As such, we can say for certain that no one named “Jesus” lived in the 1st-century CE. “Jesus” is a falsified and manmade 17th-century forgery. More troubling still, “Jesus” is most closely allied linguistically with “Gesus,” the savior of the Druid religion (still practiced throughout England), wherein the “Horned One” was considered god.

There are a plethora of Christian (a title we will refute momentarily) apologists who errantly claim that “Jesus” was a transliteration of the Greek Iesou, Iesous, and Iesoun. The problem with that theory is four fold. Yahowsha’ wasn’t Greek; He was Hebrew. The Greek Iota is pronounced like the English I, rather than the come-lately J. The “u,” “us,” and “un” endings were derivatives of Greek grammar, without counterpart in Hebrew or English. And most importantly, you won’t find Iesou, Iesous, or Iesoun written on any page of any first-, second-, third-, or early fourth-century Greek manuscript. As stated previously, Divine Placeholders were universally deployed (without exception) by the Disciples to convey Yahowah’s and Yahowsha’s name. Simply stated: it is impossible to justify the use of “Jesus.” It is wrong.

Yahowsha’, as a compound of “Yahowah” and “yasha’ – salvation,” means “Yah Saves.” Yahowsha’ tells us that Yahowah manifest Himself in the form of a man, and that as a man, He Himself delivered us. Yahowsha’ explains who He is and it defines His purpose.

And let there be no dispute: in the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms, you will find Yahowsha’ (יְהוֹשֻׁעַ) written 216 times—first in Shemowth/Exodus 17:9. The Savior’s name was written Yahowshuwa’ (יְהוֹשׁוּעַ) twice (Deuteronomy 3:21 and Judges 2:7). Yashuwa’ was scribed in the revealed text on 30 occasions. And Yashuw’ah, pronounced similarly to Yahowsha’, appears another 78 times. Collectively, these 326 Scriptural witnesses of the descriptive name and title of God’s implement and mission tell us that Yahowah is personally the source of our Salvation.

There are many Messianic Jews, countless rabbis, and otherwise misinformed pseudo-intellectuals who choose to ignore the Scriptural pronunciation of Yahowsha’ (even though it is written 216 times in this form and twice as Yahowshuwa’) in favor of Yeshu (which was never written in the Torah, Prophets, or Psalms). The earliest undisputed extant occurrence of Yeshu is found in five brief anecdotes in the Babylonian Talmud (a collection of rabbinical discussions constituting Jewish Oral Law circa 500 CE). Yeshu is cited as the teacher of a heretic (in Chullin 2:22-24, Avodah Zarah 16-17), as a sorcerer scheduled to be stoned on the eve of Passover (in Sanhedrin 43a), as a “son who burns his food in public” (in Sanhedrin 103a), as an idolatrous former rabbinical student (in Sanhedrin 107b), and as the spirit of a foreigner who is an enemy of Israel (in Gittin 56b and 57a). Yeshu is also used in the Rabbinical Tannaim and Amoraim as a replacement for Manasseh’s name (Hezekiah’s only son, who at twelve assumed the throne and instituted pagan worship in direct opposition to his father) (Sanhedrin 103s and Berakhot 17b). The earliest explicit explanation of the Rabbinical term “Yeshu” is found in the mediaeval Toldoth Yeshu narratives which reveal that Yeshu was an acronym for the curse “yimmach shemo vezikhro,” which means: “may his name and memory be obliterated.”

Affirming the correct transliteration and pronunciation, Yahowah provided us with the basis of His name, hayah, and then presented his name 7,000 times, Yahowsha’s name 218 times, and 260 other Hebrew words, names, and titles all based upon “Yah,” most all of which have been affirmed in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Then in opposition we have rabbis who universally despise Yahowsha’ advocating Yeshu for religious reasons. So it seems reasonable to me to devalue their conflicting testimony in favor of Yahowah’s preference for Yah, not Ye, when addressing the Ma’aseyah.

During their Babylonian captivity in the 6th-century BCE, Yahuwdym (known as Jews today) developed a number of bad habits. As a result of being demeaned and mocked under the slang epithet “Yahoos,” they developed an aversion to all things “yah.” To minimize this irritation, Yahuwdym made it a crime to actually say Yahowah’s name. But they went even further, and purposefully misapplied their Sheva System, where the short e vowel was added to words comprised exclusively of consonants. And so long as the Sheva System only added this vowel to words without an Aleph, Ayin, Yod, He, or Waw, that would have been fine. But they decided to assign an “e” following every occurrence of Yod (י), irrespective of the fact that the י is a vowel, and is most often followed by another vowel, usually He (ה), and thereby altered the existing and proper pronunciation of the most important names, titles, and words found in the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms, including the spelling of God’s name. And while it sounds judgmental, this inconsistent application of their rule was done to keep people from knowing or saying: “Yah.”

While we are on this subject, it is particularly telling that Sheva is from shav’ (שׁוא), the Hebrew word for “vanity,” in the sense of “failed and for naught.” Shav’ is “false, worthless, and lying speech which leads to emptiness and nothingness.” The fact that these deceivers labeled their revisionist system “false speech” is devastating to their credibility, and thus to the appropriateness of modern Hebrew vocalizations. But with some due diligence, it gets even worse. There was no “v” in the Hebrew language, so shav’ itself is a product of linguistic manipulation. Comprised of Shin-Waw-Aleph (שׁוא), this word was originally pronounced showa’, and it meant: “to ravage, destroy, and devastate, creating a desolate, lifeless, wasteland.” Such is the result of removing Yahowah’s name from our collective consciousness, and for changing not only the way it is spoken, but also the relationship between it and other words, titles and names associated with Yah.

By altering the existing and accurate paleo-Hebrew (Scriptural) pronunciation of the vowel following every Yod (י), to “eh,” even when a Yod is combined with He (ה), which is pronounced “ah,” as in hayah, and by changing the Waw (ו) from the vowel sound “o,” “oo,” or “u,” to the consonant “v,” all four letters in Yahowah’s name (הוהי) were compromised. Further, while showa’ (שׁוא) and shuwa’ (שׁוּעַ), were written differently in the text, because they are transliterated similarly, by implementing the Sheva System, Yahowshuwa’ of the Torah has now been associated with “false speech” by these deceivers—the same Scriptural manipulators later known as Masoretes. They are the ones who brought us the Masoretic Text and the corruption of Yahowah and Yahowshuwa’. They are the ones who promoted the myth that no one knows how to pronounce the name of God. They are the ones who would have you believe that Yehshu and Yehshua are accurate representations of the Hebrew name of the person known to us as “Jesus.” Do you suppose it was all coincidence?

These things known, the second most misleading myth has been lampooned. The human manifestation of Yahowah, the corporeal implement God would use to do the work required to save us, is Yahowsha’, or Yahowshuwa’, depending upon which pronunciation you prefer. This name, as a synthesis of Yahowah and yasha’, the Hebrew word for “salvation,” says: “Yahowah is our Savior.”

Moving on to the next religious deception, if “Christ” was Yahowsha’s title, and it’s not, there would still be no justification for writing or saying “Jesus Christ,” as if “Christ” was His last name. Moreover, without the definite article, “Christ Jesus” is also wrong. Should “Christ” be valid, and again it is not, the only valid use of the title would be as “the Christ.” But what we discover is that Classical Greek authors used chrio, the basis of “Christ” to describe the “application of drugs.” A legacy of this reality is the international symbol for medicines and the stores in which they are sold—Rx—from the Greek Rho Chi, the first two letters in chrio. So those who advocate “Christ,” and its derivative, “Christian,” are unwittingly suggesting that that Yahowsha’, and those who follow Him, are “drugged.”

Christians who protest that “Christ” is simply a transliteration of Christos, Christou, Christo, and Christon, either are not aware, or don’t want you to know, that you will find only one place in the whole of the Greek text prior to the mid 4th-century where any variation of chrio is actually written—and it does not apply to Yahushua. All references to the Ma’aseyah’s title were presented using the Divine Placeholders ΧΣ, ΧΥ, ΧΩ, and ΧΝ.

The only time we find a derivative of chrio in God’s voice is when the Ma’aseyah Yahowsha’ toys with the Laodicean Assembly (representing Protestant Christians living in today’s Western Democracies) in His seventh prophetic letter. To appreciate His sense of humor, and to fully understand the point He was making, it is important to note that the Laodiceans were wealthy and self-reliant. They made a fortune promoting their own brand of ointment for the ears and eyes known as “Phrygian powder,” under the symbol “Rx. So referencing their healthcare system, Yahowsha’ admonished: “I advise that you…rub (egchrio – smear) your eyes with medicinal cake (kollourion – a drug preparation for tired and sore eyes known as the cake which glues together) in order that you might see.” (Revelation 3:18) Therefore, in the singular reference to chrio, the root of christo, in the totality of the pre-Constantine Greek manuscripts, Yahowsha’ used chrio to describe the application of drugs.

To further indict “Christ” and “Christian,” even if the tertiary definition of chriso, “anointed,” were intended, it still describes the “application of a medicinal ointment or drug.” But even if we let go of the word’s pharmaceutical baggage, we’d still be left with other insurmountable problems.

First, the Scriptural evidence strongly suggests that Yahowsha’s title was not “ha Mashiach,” which means “the Anointed,” but instead “ha Ma’aseyah,” which translates to “the Implement Doing the Work of Yah.” (More on this in a moment.)

Second, “ha Ma’aseyah,” as a Hebrew title, like the name Yahowsha’, should have been transliterated (presented phonetically) in Greek and also English, not translated. For example, the titles Rabbi, Imam, Pharaoh, Czar, Sheik, and Pope were all transliterated, not translated.

Third, there is no justification for using Hellenized nomenclature when addressing a Hebrew concept. And since Yahowsha’ did not communicate in Greek, that language is nothing more than a translation of what He actually said.

And fourth, the textual evidence suggests that the Divine Placeholders ΧΣ, ΧΥ, ΧΩ, and ΧΝ were not based upon Christos, Christou, Christo, or Christon, as those who have an aversion to all things Hebrew would have you believe. Consider this: Writing about the great fire which swept through Rome in 64 CE, the Roman historian Tacitus (the classical world’s most authoritative voice) in Annals XV.44.2-8, revealed: “All human efforts…and propitiations of the gods, did not banish the sinister belief that the fire was the result of an order [from Nero]. Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Chrestucians (Chrestuaneos) by the populous. Chrestus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilate. And a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their center and become popular. Accordingly, an arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of firing the city, as of hatred against mankind. Mockery of every sort was added to their deaths. Covered with the skins of beasts, they were torn by dogs and perished, or were nailed to crosses, or were doomed to the flames and burnt, to serve as a nightly illumination when daylight had expired.”

But there is more, the Nestle-Aland 27th Edition Greek New Testament reveals that Chrestus (χρηστὸς) was scribed in 1 Peter 2:3, not Christos. Their references for this include Papyrus 72 and the Codex Sinaiticus, the oldest extant witnesses of Peter’s (actually of Shim’own Kephas’ letter).

In Shim’own’s epistle, one attested by both ancient manuscripts, the Disciple and Apostle tells us: “As a newborn child, true to our real nature (logikos – genuine, reasonable, rational, and sensible), earnestly desire and lovingly pursue (epipotheo – long for, showing great affection while yearning) the pure and unadulterated (adolos – that which is completely devoid of dishonest intent, deceit, or deception) milk in order to grow in respect to salvation, since we have experienced (geuomai – partaken and tasted, have been nourished by) Yahowah (ΚΣ) as the Useful Implement and Upright Servant (Chrestus – the Upright One who is a superior, merciful, gracious, kind, and good tool).” (1 Peter 2:2-3) The fact that we find Chrestus written in the Codex Sinaiticus, and the placeholder ΧΡΣ written in P72 in the same place in this passage, we have an early affirmation that the Divine Placeholder representing the title “Ma’aseyah” was based upon the Greek Chrestus, not Christos.

And while Chrestus isn’t Yahowsha’s title, it is at least an apt translation of it. Chrestus means “useful implement,” and “upright servant,” as well as “merciful one.” It was used to “depict the good and beneficial work of a moral person.” So rather than being “drugged,” a Chrestucian is a “useful implement, an upright servant, and a moral person working beneficially” with Yah.

With a second and third myth resolved, let’s turn our attention to Yahowsha’s actual title. To begin, let’s consider the issues of consistency and relevance. Most every important name, title, and word associated with Yahowah and our yashuw’ah / salvation, bears God’s signature: “Yah.” So as you think about the following examples cited from Scripture, please consider the likelihood that Yahowah’s most important title would not be included in this list. And at the same time, I would encourage you to ponder the collective message communicated by these names, while at the same time contemplating the consequence of their religious corruptions.

Starting with the Savior Yahowsha’, and salvation, yashuw’ah, these words, titles, and names include: yahab – Yah Gives and Yah Provides, yahuwd – Yah Knows and Loves, Yahuwd – the Place Yah Knows and Loves (Judah), Yahuwda’y, Yahuwdy and Yahuwdym – Related to Yah (Jew and Jews), Yahuwdiyth – Yah’s Language (Hebrew), Yahuchanan – Yah is Merciful (John), Yahuwyada’ – Yah Knows (Jehoiada), Yahuwyakyn and Yahuwyaqym – Yah Establishes and Uplifts (Jehoiachin and Jehoiakim), Yahuwnatan – Yah Gives (Jonathan), Yahuwtsadaq – Yah Vindicates (Josedech), Yahuwram – Yah Uplifts (Jehoram), Yahuwsheba’ – Yah’s Promise of Seven (Jehosheba), Yahuwshaphat – Yah Judges (Jehoshaphat), ‘Abiyah and ‘Abiyahuw’ – Yah is my Father (Abijah and Abihu), ‘Edonyah – Yah is the Upright Pillar (Adonijah), ‘Uwryah – Yah is Light (Uriah), ‘Achazyah – Yah Grasps Hold (Ahaziah), ‘Achyah – Yah’s Familial Relationship (Ahijah), ‘Elyah – Yah is God (Elijah), ‘Amatsyah – Yah is Aware and Capable (Amaziah), ‘Amaryah – Yah Speaks (Amariah), binyah – Yah’s Son (building), Banayah – Yah Builds Up and Establishes (Benaiah), biryah – Yah Nourishes (meat), Berekyah – Yah Kneels Down to Bless (Berechaih), gadyah – Yah’s Lamb (kid), Gadalyah and Gadalyahuw – Yah Grows (Gedaliah), gawyah – Yah’s Deceased Body (corpse (speaking of Passover)), Gamaryahuw – Yah Completes (Gemariah), daliyah – Yah’s Branch (branch (a Ma’aseyah metaphor)), Howsha’yah – Saved by Yah (Hoshaiah), Zabadyah – Yah’s Gift Endows (Zebadiah), Zakaryahuw – Remember Yah (Zechariah), Chagiyah – Yah’s Festival Feasts (Haggiah), Chizqyah – Yah Strengthens and Prevails (Hezekiah), chayah – Live with Yah (life), Chilqiyah – Share with Yah (Hilkiah), Chananyahuw – Yah’s Merciful (Hananiah), Chashabyah – Yah’s Plan (Hashabiah), Towbiyah – Yah is Good (Tobiah), Yakda’yah – Acknowledge Yah (Jedaiah), Yachizqiyahuw – Yah Strengthens (also rendered Hezekiah), Yariyahuw – Yah is the Source of Instruction (Jerijah), Yirmayahuw – Yah Lifts Up (Jeremiah), Yasha’yahuw – Salvation is from Yah (Isaiah), Mow’adyah – Yah’s Appointed Meetings (Moadiah), Mowriyah – Revere Yah (Mount Moriah), michyah – Yah Preserves Life (preserves life), Machceyah – Yah’s Shelter (Maaseiah), Malkiyah – Yah Rules (Malchiah), Ma’aseyah – Doing Yah’s Work (Maaseiah), Ma’aseyahuw – Implement of Yah (Maaseiah), Miqneyahuw – Redeemed by Yah (Mikneiah), Mashelemyahuw – Yah’s Visible Likeness (Meshelemiah), Mattanyah and Mathithyahuw – Yah’s Gift (Mattaniah and Matthew), Nachemyah – Yah Consoles and Comforts (Nehemiah), Ne’aryah – Yah’s Young Servant (Neariah), Neriyahuw – Yah’s Lamp (Neriah), Nathanyahuw = Yah Gives (Nethaniah), ‘Obadyah – Work With Yah (Obadiah), ‘Adayah – Yah’s Pass Over Adorns (Adaiah), ‘Uziyahuw and ‘Uziya’ – Yah is Mighty (Uzziah), ‘Ananyah – Yah Appears (Ananiah), ‘Anayah – Yah Answers and Responds (Anaiah), ‘Azaryahuw – Yah Supports and Assists (Azariah), ‘Asayah – Yah Does the Work (Asaiah), ‘Amacyah – Yah Carries Our Burdens (Amasiah), ‘Athalyahuw – Yah’s Splendid Choice (Athaliah), Padayah – Yah Ransoms and Redeems (Pedaiah), Palatyahuw – Yah Saves and Sets Free (Pelatiah), Tsidqiyahuw – Yah’s Justice Vindicates (Zedekiah), tsaphiyah – Observe Yah (examine), Tsaphanyahuw – Treasure Yah (Zephaniah), tuwshiyah – Yah’s Wisdom (wisdom), Tsaruwyah – Be Bound to Yah (Zeruiah), Qowlayah – Listen to the Voice of Yah (Kolaiah), Ramalyahuw – Be Raised by Yah (Remaliah), ra’yah – Yah Loves (love), Shobyah – Yah’s Branch and Staff (Shachia), Sherebyah – Yah’s Scepter (Sherebiah), Sarayah – Persist and Persevere With Yah (Seraiah), Raphayah – Yah Heals & Restores (Rephaiah), Shakanyahuw – Settle and Dwell with Yah (Shechaniah), Shelemyah – Yah Provides a Peace Offering (Shelemiah), Shama’yah – Listen to Yah (Shemaiah), and Shamaryahuw – Closely Observe Yah (Shemariah).

Reading this list, it becomes evident that the prophets and disciples, Yasha’yahu (Isaiah), Zakaryahuw (Zechariah), Chizqyah (Hezekiah), Yirmayahuw (Jeremiah), ‘Elyah (Elijah), Nachemyah (Nehemiah), Mathithyahuw (Matthew), and Yahuchanan (John), told us to Shama’yah (listen to Yah) in Yahuwdiyth (Yah’s Language) regarding a Yahuwdy (Jewish) yashuw’ah (Savior) who arrived in Yahuwd (Judah) named Yahuwsha’ as the ‘Edonyah (Upright Pillar), as the Ma’aseyah (Implement of Yah), as binyah (Yah’s Son), as gadyah (Yah’s Lamb), as daliyah (Yah’s Branch), berekyah (as Yah kneeling down and diminishing Himself to bless us), banayah (establishing) the Towrah (prescriptions for living) on Mount Mowryah (Revere Yah) on the Chagiyah (Yah’s Festival Feast), the Mow’adyah (Yah’s Appointed Meeting Time), of ‘Adayah (Yah’s Passover) to Padayah (ransom and redeem us as Yah) to Palatyahuw (have Yah save us and sets us free), with Tsidqiyahuw (Yah’s justice vindicating us) so that we might chayah (live with Yah), Shakanyahuw (settling down and dwelling with Yah). Or in conclusion: Zakaryahuw Yahuchanan Yahsa’yahuw (Remember Yah is our Merciful Savior), the Ma’aseyah Yahowsha’ (the Implement Doing the Work of Yahowah which provides Salvation).

But perhaps, Yah had a...

Edited by moderator Wednesday, January 5, 2011 6:08:29 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Offline Walt  
#211 Posted : Tuesday, January 4, 2011 3:35:02 PM(UTC)
Walt
Joined: 10/26/2008(UTC)
Posts: 374
Man

Kiwifruit wrote:


As an aside, I have been replying to Ken's daily inspirations as he presents them on his facebook site. He is still an advocate of old Sha'uwl in denial of the evidence.


Of course Ken is an advocate of Paul, he professes to be a christian, friend of calvary chapel, and promotes jesus christ as savior

Offline Matthew  
#212 Posted : Tuesday, January 4, 2011 5:18:54 PM(UTC)
Matthew
Joined: 10/3/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,191
Man
Location: São Paulo, Brazil

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Well I can personally tell you KP prefers to keep his distance, focus on his current project, The Torah Code, and focus on his family. As I've communicated with him personally on various issues related to QP and such, it should truly be a cause for concern to forum members as to why he has chosen to not speak out. Numerous people on this forum have underestimated KP's wisdom and knowledge of Scripture. Hopefully his current project will point the correct way to Yahweh. It's obviously not written in response to QP but nevertheless, in my opinion, settles the path we should take, at least from what I've been fortunate enough to read so far. I've pretty much read the first 3 chapters (a volume on its own) and it refers to Paul quite a bit, or should I say the Pauline passage serves rather to confirm what Scripture already teaches. So anti-Paulers might find it tough to swallow.

Also, let's not forget the friendship KP and Yada share. Think about it...

The problem with the Paul debate is that it's a very heated debate, consider Yahshua's heated reaction to the Pharisees who focused more on the signs than the meanings of the signs. I'm not saying the anti-Pauler's are Pharisees, but using it as an example.

I'm not going to respond to Yada's response to me as my point was made and he stated his in regards to this particular passage alone, therefore it's up to forum members to decide whether current translations are right or Yada is right. Please note I didn't bring up his translation of 2 Peter, which I would also like forum members to take into consideration.

At the end of the day we are all trying to find Yahweh and the way to Him. We are more aligned than what people think, even when we do try bash in each other's heads in. Consider the world who hate Yahweh.
Offline RidesWithYah  
#213 Posted : Wednesday, January 5, 2011 3:57:12 PM(UTC)
RidesWithYah
Joined: 6/10/2008(UTC)
Posts: 331

Kiwi,

Looks like your post got truncated by the character limit.
Mind adding the rest of his reply on the names?
It's a very interesting study.
Offline Walt  
#214 Posted : Thursday, January 6, 2011 2:02:42 AM(UTC)
Walt
Joined: 10/26/2008(UTC)
Posts: 374
Man

lassie1865 wrote:
Yada said he pasted 70 pages of his new introduction to YY here (Jan 4, 2011)? I copied what is posted here, but I can only seem to copy 7 pages . . . ??


Yahowah

…Who is God and What Does He Want?


Towrah – Instruction


‘Amar ‘eth ‘elohym – A Conversation With God…





Dear sister - where did this come from? I searched YY and couldn't find it. I assume it's a new one Yada is writing?
Also the link at the bottom of your post shows 56 pages, but you mention 70 pages.
Offline lassie1865  
#215 Posted : Thursday, January 6, 2011 5:37:29 AM(UTC)
lassie1865
Joined: 2/18/2008(UTC)
Posts: 309
Woman
Location: Colorado

Walt, I see the file attachment: towrah.doc listed on Jan 4, 2011, at 1:13 at the bottom of the post (somehow it is attached to my post-I don't know how that happened . .. . )
Offline Daniel  
#216 Posted : Thursday, January 6, 2011 7:11:36 AM(UTC)
Daniel
Joined: 10/24/2010(UTC)
Posts: 694
Location: Florida

lassie1865 wrote:
Walt, I see the file attachment: towrah.doc listed on Jan 4, 2011, at 1:13 at the bottom of the post (somehow it is attached to my post-I don't know how that happened . .. . )

57 pages, by my count.
Nehemiah wrote:
"We carried our weapons with us at all times, even when we went for water" Nehemiah 4:23b

We would do well to follow Nehemiah's example! http://OurSafeHome.net
Offline Richard  
#217 Posted : Friday, January 7, 2011 2:46:08 AM(UTC)
Richard
Joined: 1/19/2010(UTC)
Posts: 695
Man
United States

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 7 post(s)
I look forward to reading "Towrah" this weekend. Thank you, whoever attached it to Lassie1865's post!

Richard
Offline Yada  
#218 Posted : Friday, January 7, 2011 5:31:31 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

The following is an extended exchange between "JB" and Yada:


Quote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 4:19 PM, "JB" wrote:

Yada,

Since 1998 I have followed and inquired the Spirit of Truth for answers to my questions.


J,

Yahowah told us to observe His Word for answers. Apart from the verification provided by Yahowah's Word (the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms), there is no way to distinguish which spirit is communicating with you, so be very careful. Yahowah's Set-Apart Spirit would not direct you to "Jesus," or even to Yahowsha', but instead to Yahowah, the Covenant, the Commandments, and the Called-Out Assemblies--all of which are presented in the Torah.



I have come to identical conclusions as you have concerning many issues.


It doesn't matter if you agree with me or not, only that you agree with Yahowah and His Torah, Prophets, and Psalms. And with Him, you have to agree on every issue, not some, many, or even most.


Including what you said about wikileaks. Ask Dave. Before you had your show that Thurs, I called in at least twice saying almost word for word what you then said on your show.


The Wiki Leaks insights are political, not relational. I am glad we agree, but this does not identify the nature of the spirit with whom you are associating.



It is impossible that it was not Yah who saved me in 1998.


Only Yahowah can save, but there is only one way for Him to save. So unless you were saved by way of Passover and Unleavened Bread, you were not saved. Moreover, salvation is not the goal, but instead part of the process. The goal is to develop a relationship with Yahowah as He revealed Himself. Our reconciliation makes that possible. But the Christian focus is on salvation, rather than knowing or even caring about what God is actually like or what He wants.

I'm not judging you, just advising you to observe the Torah if you want to be part of Yahowah's family.


Yahowsha, at the end of the sermon on the mount was talking about the folks like modern day pastors who spoil the elders houses for a prayer, and declare they know Yah. The sick who are healed when these deviants lay hands on them in the name of Yah are healed by Him because of their sincere faith in Him NOT the deviant pastors/preachers. I'm sure you understand the difference.


Actually, He was speaking about Paul, initially, and those like him, who claim to represent God but do not, and then of those who believe they are saved because of their feelings and experiences. Everyone who has been fooled by religion believes that they have been saved.


As far as relying on a voice heard inside, you do not know, nor can you judge a man's heart.


Your heart and my judgment have nothing to do with anything. Knowing Yahowah comes from observing His Covenant, His Towrah, His Called-Out Assemblies, His Instructions. It is not about believing, but instead about knowing. It's not what you feel, but instead what He revealed.

Therefore, I can tell you, because He told us, that only those who observe His instructions are saved.



After these things happened I turned to the Word of Yah and saw that what happened to me was EXACTLY as Yahowsha stated in the sermon on the mount.


The Word of Yahowah is found in the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms--not in the "New Testament." And the order that you experienced these things is reversed.

Unless you entered through the gate of life known as Passover, and unless you observe Unleavened Bread, unless you celebrate FirstFruits, unless you know Yahowah as He revealed Himself, unless you observe His Covenant and Torah, you don't know what happened to you, to Yahowsha', or why He began His ministry with His very unpopular Sermon on the Mount, wherein He affirmed the Torah, or why He concluded it by enabling Yahowah's Passover, Unleavened Bread, and FirstFruits promises. You are like the two guys on the road to Emmaus.



When I was in my apartment that December, and cried out to God with pure sincerety, I indeed saw Him. I won't go into detail, you wouldn't understand. When I returned I was given work to do until the return of the Messiah which I continue to do today.


Paul was convinced he saw him too, as was Muhammad. Both were given work to do. Both were mistaken.

God did not tell us if He would reveal Himself as you believe He has with you. Nor did He tell us if there was a different way to develop a relationship with Him. So, no one, including you, can know their fate for certain under these circumstances, apart from the narrow way He has provided. All anyone can know for sure is that if they have come to know Yahowah as He revealed Himself, and if they choose to walk away from religion and to Him on the very specific path He has provided, that they will live with Him.




All that God in the flesh said is true. When I turned to Him He made His abode with me.
He declared me His friend.


Yahowah did not visit you in the flesh. Of that I can be certain. He will not return until Yowm Kippurym in 2033. Sorry.


I have the same question for you as I had for catholics. Why do you seek Him through His instructions when you can simply ask Him if He lives inside you?


Because this is what He told us to do and I trust Him. If your god has a different path to Him for different people, then He is not the God who revealed Himself in the Torah.


Why toil over the particulars and semantics of language, translations, meanings when He will tell you right now being inside you. You won't find the kingdom of Yah "outside", but "inside" right now. Is it not true that we can ask anything of Him and He will do it if we follow Him? Ask and you shall receive, knock and it will be opened, seek and you shall find? How much more will God give those the Spirit who ask H


J, this is goodbye. Based upon this paragraph, I cannot help you. If you are not willing to toil over the particulars and the semantics of language, translations, and meanings, then God's Word is of no value to you either.

This is as far as I have read. It is as far as I can go. Goodbye, J.

Yada



Yah Himself confounded our languages long ago in Gen 11. Imagine your dad turning his back on you and kicking you out of the family because you called him "pops" instead of "daddy". If your earthly father, being a sinner, wouldn't treat you so cruel, why would the heavenly Father, full of unconditional love do so to His children?

There is only one way to Yah, through His Saviour, Yashowa, who was Yah Himself in the flesh, and there are numerous witnesses, who came down to blame Himself for all our sin, so that we would not be destroyed, as He can tolerate no sin, so that we may have eternal life with Him. He fulfilled THAT plan when He (what we would call) died, and then rose from the dead, proving to us that He cannot die and is truly the One God.

It's simple enough for a child to understand, and that's all He requires.

Love in Yah,

-J


I had a couple of questions as a result of this exchange. Yada's answers are in red:

Quote:
Yada - I did have a couple of quick questions/points of clarification: Renewal of the Covenant was not contingent upon Yahushu's sacrifice?


Hi Yada,

That is what Paul would have us believe--although Paul speaks of a second one which is new and entirely different. In actuality, Yahowsha's participation in Passover, Unleavened Bread, and FirstFruits, and the Spirit's participation in Seven Sabbaths, was nothing more or less than the affirmation and fulfillment of four of the Torah's promises. Nothing changed.

While salvation is required for us to have a relationship with God, that is not the purpose or the focus of the Covenant. Christians are all focused on the magic formula for salvation, when Yahowah is focused on His Covenant relationship. Its renewal on Yowm Kippurym entails Yahowah's name being written upon us and upon the Torah being placed inside of us--and thus being undeniable. Neither of these things has occurred. Further the renewal of the Covenant is for Yahuwdym and Yisra'el, not for Gowym.



If the covenant has not been renewed, how would you term the period that we currently find ourselves?


There is no if. The Covenant has not been renewed. I believed that it had, and thus constantly referred to the Renewed Covenant Writings in YY, but I was wrong. All one has to do is read the entire Jeremiah 31 discussion. It's obvious. It is a wonder so many of us have been mislead so long. I cover this in the new Shabat chapter.

While timing is important to God, time is all the same to Him. That said, currently we are coming to the end of the time of man represented by six. We have emerged from the time of confusion represented by five.



How are you now referring to the "Renewed Covenant" writings?


There is no good or easy definition for them, and I suppose that is as it should be. They are not Scripture. I will use eyewitness accounts, but that only pertains to Mattinyahu and Yahowchanan plus Revelation. I'll use Greek texts or Luke's letters. But apart from Yahowsha's words, and an accounting of His deeds, there is nothing in them which pertains to knowing Yahowah. And they have been retained so carelessly, there is no way to be sure what Yahowsha' said unless He is citing Scripture.


Also, how is Scripture defined/determined?


According to Yahowah: accurate prophecy. It is one of the reasons we know that Paul was a false prophet. His timing on his "harpazo - snatching away" was wrong by nearly 2000 years.



-Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#219 Posted : Saturday, January 8, 2011 6:08:16 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

The Conversation with "JB" continues. He writes:

Quote:
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 6:06 PM, "JB" wrote:

Yada,

I thought initially that we might establish a friendship. I thought maybe it was at least extremely interesting how we seemed to consistently come to the same conclusions.

You know how people find that they have a lot in common. It's called "friendship".

Even reading some of your writings was intriguing to me.

Now you have gone way too far, denying God in the flesh. Saying the witnesses accounts are inaccurate and we can't rely on the Words of Jesus. Saying the US constitution shouldn't guarantee the freedom of religion (which would have to include free speech as well), saying you are anti- military? I would love if our elected officials would adhere to the Constitution. I have nothing against the military folks. I just want them here with us defending our country instead of foreign ones.

What God has said from Genesis to Revelation is written on my heart. I live on His every Word. There is no sense in debating this with you. I figured I'd be preaching to the choir.

I know Him personally. Nothing you or any other flawed mortal will tell me otherwise. I would never judge a man's salvation nor relationship with God the way you have done.

I suppose the "Golden rule" is inaccurate as well? Do folks have to consult your research before they dare to believe something?

Have I accused you of rejecting God's Word and leading people astray? You have no idea what God has told me or the message I reveal to folks.

God will be the judge.

-JB


Yada's response:
Quote:

J,

The god you claim to have seen in person, that you believe you saw in person, told us that that there would be people who would claim to have seen him in person, as you have done, but he said that their claims would not be true--and that they would be false prophets. He said that the next time he would be seen by anyone, he would be seen by everyone at the same time. That is why I backed away from you J.

Once you take this position, J, once you prioritize private visitations and personal spiritual inspirations over Yahowah's Torah, Prophets, and Psalms, once you write that we shouldn't bother to carefully observe what Yahowah revealed, and once you begin stating things which are inconsistent with what God has told us, then you have moved to a place where no one can reason with you--not even God.

I'm not going to get into the details of this letter, J, because it serves no purpose. You are now twisting everything, my words and God's.

I will leave you with these thoughts...

Yahowah, using prophecy, has proven that His Torah, Prophets, and Psalms are trustworthy. On this, Yahowsha' completely agrees. Further, Yahowsha's words (which are consistent with Yahowah's Word because most everything he said either cited, paraphrased, or explained the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms), to the extent that they were accurately remembered by Mattinyahu and Yahowchanan, accurately translated by them from Hebrew and Aramaic to Greek, accurately retained by scribes after them (something we know did not happen), available to us in multiple consistent manuscripts from the second century (which has very seldom occurred), and then to the extent that these early manuscripts are accurately translated into a modern language, they, like Yahowah's words, are trustworthy.

Your private inspiration could only be considered trustworthy, J , if it was one hundred percent consistent with Yahowah's Word and if it was filled with one hundred percent accurate prophecies. So, if you want to test your inspiration, the test is listed in Deuteronomy 18. I've translated it for you in Yada Yahweh and in Questioning Paul, should your Hebrew be lacking.

If you want to discuss Yahowah's Torah, Prophets, and Psalms, and how to observe His Word, or how Yahowsha' served as the human manifestation of the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms, I'd be glad to converse with you. But if you want to promote your personal and private inspiration, I have no interest. I care about the Covenant, the Commandments, the Called-Out Assemblies, the Torah, the Word, the Way, and the Name.

As for politics, I only discuss it to draw attention to Yahowah's Word--so that I have the opportunity to point people toward the truth.

God is not only the only valid judge, He has already revealed the criterion He will use to judge. You do not have to wait to find out if what you believe is actually true.

It does not matter to me, and it should not matter to anyone else, what you believe god has told you privately. Yahowah told us that His Torah was complete, that it was perfect, that it was the means to restoration and renewal, and that we should not add to it or take away from it. It answers every question we need to know.

Belief is a very dangerous thing J. Most people believe things which are not true. God wants us to know, and based upon knowing, to understand, and based upon understanding, to trust and rely. The only way to know, to understand, to trust and rely is to closely observe the evidence available to us regarding Yahowah and then rationally consider the implications of this information and instruction. That brings us back to the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms.

So, based upon the Torah, my last bit of advice to you J is this. Be careful when it comes to revealing your private message to people. What you have shared with me is inconsistent with Yahowah's instructions, and therefore, to the extent that others have believed you, you may have put your soul at risk.

If you want to share that which we know God shared with all of us, so that more people know what He revealed, that would be a worthy use of your time.

Yada

If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline VinceB.  
#220 Posted : Saturday, January 8, 2011 10:36:02 AM(UTC)
VinceB.
Joined: 12/2/2010(UTC)
Posts: 228

Yada wrote:
The Conversation with "JB" continues. He writes:



Yada's response:



I can empathize with J, having listened to the questioning and answers via the same program in question...

Coming out of RCC, back in the early 80s, and more recently, Evangelicalism (in other words: all things Pauline Doctrine related), as recently as Dec. 2010, I can see how Pauline Doctrine is and has become the default belief system ingrained into us by our upbringing, and happens to be foundational to the way in which America in particular, has evolved (in fact: the entire western civilization has the 'MARKS' of Paul all over it) - as such, Pauline Doctrine can be likened to 'glue': as in, can be likened to 'superglue'...collectively, these are all hard things to try and unweave from the very construct of our being with its slanted/twisted filters in which we try and evaluate our lives, and the world around us by.

As best as I've been able to figure out, and I'm a continuous work in progress, is: everything Yahowah's said, and everything Yahowah did, and everything Yahowah said He will do have been given to us as "Gifts"...He's done, and will continue to do, all the heavy lifting. He affirms, He confirms, and He accomplishes/fulfills the entire ongoing works Himself, we receiving these very gifts is found in our willingness to want to participate in observing/learning/celebrate etc etc etc the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms trusting and relying upon Yahowah without deviating to the right and/or left...Pauline Doctrine allows for none of this...to Paul, all that Yahowah has said, all that Yahowah has done, and that Yahowah is going to do is now been made a moot point simply because Paul said so (and because he created a religion out of the death and resurrection of Yahowsha' to the exclusion of the Torah Prophets and Psalms [and what God's Word has to say about it all...]) which just so happens to be the exact opposite of what the Torah Prophets and Psalms has to say about any of these life and death matters...
HWHY
Offline cgb2  
#221 Posted : Saturday, January 8, 2011 6:10:58 PM(UTC)
cgb2
Joined: 5/14/2010(UTC)
Posts: 689
Location: Colorado

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 24 time(s) in 18 post(s)
Offline Noel  
#222 Posted : Sunday, January 9, 2011 9:03:01 AM(UTC)
Noel
Joined: 9/27/2009(UTC)
Posts: 92
Location: UK

Hello JB (if you are still there)

In order that I may understand what is happening better, would you please be prepared to say what exactly the work you were given by Yahuwah to do and which you referred to in one of your earlier posts. Also, are you in fellowship with any other people at the moment and if so, it would help me to understand what is the forum in which you meet etc.

I am not asking this in order to be critical in any way. I am just keen to know.


Thanks Noel
Offline bigritchie  
#223 Posted : Sunday, January 9, 2011 4:07:05 PM(UTC)
bigritchie
Joined: 4/15/2010(UTC)
Posts: 305
Location: USA



I have come to believe that the Pagan sun god worship religion known as "Protesting Catholics" is nothing more the a modern day revival of the religion of Marcion.
Offline Yada  
#224 Posted : Thursday, January 20, 2011 5:22:33 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Putter, "CC" wrote:

Hi Yada

I want to thank you for your time and effort and diligence in writing Yada YHWH. I have studied it and even verified it. What can I say, it opened my mind and YHWH came and renewed my thoughts and so much has happened since I decided to trust in YHWH, to rely on Him and to know and use His Name – YHWH. My journey to the truth started in 1996 and the first thing YHWH showed me those many years ago, was about relationship – though I did not fully comprehended it then. One of my dreams was to be a full time minister, but by Yah’s grace only, it never realized and today I know why – if did it happened – I would never have come to know the truth, and I would have been lost.

Last year in September, YHWH invited me and my wife, to come and camp out with Him on a 5 hectare plot and said that it should be called Sukkah. We have made an offer to purchase in May last year, and nothing (seemingly) went right. But we trusted and relied on YHWH, knowing that He will provide. Moving there on the Thursday before the feast of Sukkoth, He showed us His timing and provision.

How much my life has changed since I decided to stand on and use His proper Name. I started about 30 months ago (still not knowing the whole truth) to use His Name (YHWH), a pastor in our ex-church asked me about it and after a lengthy discussion with him, trying to pursue me that God and Jesus is right and acceptable, I asked YHWH to show me the truth. He (YHWH) confirmed it seven times that I should know His Name and that I should use is. Right there I made my decision to never trust any man again and I kept on using YHWH’s name. I have been sending a daily devotion with some thoughts for the past 11 years to about 500 people, and since then I have changed the scripture and prayer to reflect Yah’s proper name. I had a lot of people asking me about it to whom I could then witness about the truth.

That is why it probably took me 8 months to work through your manuscript – Yada YHWH

You mentioned that you would be updating / adding some sections to the manuscript and I just want to know if you have done so, and if so, could you mail it to me?

Here where I am sitting and typing this mail to you, I have such a pressing urge to thank you for your obedience, knowing that it took a hefty price, for doing what YHWH asked you to do. THANK YOU Yada!

Shalom

-C


Yada's response:
Quote:

Hello C,

Welcome to Yahowah's family. Thank you for sharing your journey from religion to relationship, from faith to trust, from believing to knowing.

The most recently updated portions of Yada Yahweh include twelve chapters in www.QuestioningPaul.com and the Shabat chapter in the first volume.

For the past few months I have been writing a Prelude to Yada Yahweh, which is now 300 pages, but I have not yet posted it. It's purpose was two fold, to provide a much more condensed presentation of the seven most important topics (the Torah, the Word, the Name, the Covenant, the Commandments, the Called-Out Assemblies, and the Prophets), and to better prepare me for a comprehensive edit of Yada Yahweh (which will commence when the Prelude is completed).

If you'd like to read the Prelude in its current, very raw and unfinished form, I'll send it to you. But be aware, it is filled with incomplete sections, as I have not been writing it from beginning to end, but from the inside out, as I am led to new topics, format, and flow.

In it you will find a comprehensive section on the transliteration of Yahowah and Yahowsha'.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline James  
#225 Posted : Thursday, February 10, 2011 5:07:53 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
S wrote:
Yada,

Greetings in the name of Yahuwah!
Please read the following and reply when you get a chance.
Toda!

S

Lev 23:15 ‘And from the morrow after the Sabbath, from the day that you brought the sheaf of the wave offering, you shall count for yourselves: seven completed Sabbaths.

Lev 23:16 ‘Until the morrow after the seventh Sabbath you count fifty days, then you shall bring a new grain offering to יהוה.


I and some friends are looking to get together this coming Shavuot... We are looking to Yahuwah to give us clarity on the proper date/time. These verses in Leviticus seem to say...

The day after the wave offering count seven complete Sabbaths...
Then the day after those seven Sabbaths count fifty days.

Why do many if not most people count fifty days from the wave offering?
Leaving out the instruction to count seven complete Sabbaths first.


Yada wrote:
S,

Since I think God was deliberately trying to make it impossible for us to know the exact right days to celebrate His Feasts with any degree of certainty, I'm not the best person to ask. I have viewed the celebration of Seven Sabbaths as occurring 49 days from FirstFruits and 50 days from the Sabbath of Unleavened Bread.

My sense of all of this remains: it is vastly more important to understand what these days represent, and to rely upon them, than it is to do everything perfectly on the right day.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#226 Posted : Thursday, March 31, 2011 4:36:59 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
KC wrote:
Hello, I just wanted to thank you for helping me come to understand basically everything. I have grown up in a baptist church all of my life and though I was "saved" at seven years old I didn't truly "hear" Yahowah until this year. And to tell you the truth I was actually very hostile to the name Yahowah and anything remotely Old testament or covenant. I refused to believe that was his name and thought it was exactly the same as saying Lord. Christian churches teach nothing. Literally. They teach about a man named Jesus and read 99% from Paul.

Yada wrote:
KC,

Thank you for sharing this. It came at the perfect time.

I can't accept any credit for Yada Yah, as everything of merit comes from Yahowah's Word. It would be like the pen Moseh used claiming credit for the Towrah. And frankly, Yada Yah has helped me understand basically everything I know too. Moreover, there are now many contributors living all around the world who read and improve the text.

But, after just enduring a very painful conversation with a Christian who is still in denial about the nature of his religion, your summery of your experiences is what I needed to hear. It is the same as my own. It is the same as I hear on the radio and see on TV. It is the same as I read online. It is anti Yah, anti Towrah, anti Covenant, anti Sabbath, anti Called-Out Assemblies, and anti anything to do with the Children of Yisra'el.



Well after I heard him call me i turned and began searching daily diligently for what I called "truth". Apparently it was a good time for Satan to step in because he introduced me to gnostic readings then that lead into reading further into Babylonian and Egyptian pagan religions. I never worshipped as such, I was ignorant and thought that it must be the truth that has been hidden. But that didn't feel right either so I kept my daily scripture readings and then I felt something was wrong with the words I was reading from Paul. No one I talked to could understand what I was seeing but I could see something wrong. So I kept praying and studying. Then I began to pray for God to help me understand the Old Testament. I just knew that I was not ever gonna understand anything if i couldn't even understand the old testament.

Yada wrote:
Most all open minded and thoughtful readers of Paul's letters, and the Gnosticism he clandestinely promoted, recognize that there is a serious problem with them. But coming to understand Paul's actual ploy isn't easy, as he was very clever. But once you come to understand Paul's tactics, everything he wrote screams "fraud." Further, there is a great deal in common between Pauline Doctrine, and thus Christianity, and the pagan religions of Babylon, Egypt, Greece and Rome. The Christian "Jesus" is very similar to Dionysus, which is why Paul quoted him on the road to Damascus.

Also, Yahowsha' was consistent, and is Yahowah. The answers are all in the Towrah. God cannot be known, the covenant cannot be engaged, and salvation is not possible without the Towrah.


that is when I believe he led me to your website. I began to read your questioning Paul works and I finally felt that I wasn't crazy. Then I googled I think Passover for some reason and I unknowingly landed back on your pages in the Called Out Book.

It was then that Yahowah opened my eyes and ears. I saw the list of all of the names that had been changed for English translation but in their true forms were all created using Yah's name. When I saw your list I could not believe my eyes. Christians are truly blinded and they don't see it.

Since beginning reading I am now going through the Genesis book. I can't thank you enough for your hard work. I can't thank you enough for giving me a place to go to help me understand the One that I fought and was so hostile against. I feel like the "truth" I was searching so hard for was the Torah, psalms and prophets all along. I just didn't understand them and didn't understand until now just how veiled the words really are in the English translated bible.

Yada wrote:
What you have written it true. By corrupting Yahowah's Word, Christians have become blind.

I have attached my incomplete draft of the Introduction to God. I have done so because it explains why I haven't yet removed the references to Paul's letters from the existing 2500 pages of Yada Yahweh. I will do so, but not before I complete the new book. (Also please only read the first five sections on the Word, Name, Towrah, Covenant, and Commandments. The rest of the material is too jumbled and incomplete to be read at this time.)

So, when you come to anything from Paul in YY, misspellings of Yah's name, or mentions of the Renewed Covenant, please understand that I'm also learning as I go and it takes time to edit out old mistakes. I did not come to recognize that Paul was a false apostle until a year ago.


Now I have an overwhelming urge to tell everyone that i know about Yahweh. I tried with my sister in law and my dad and they were so incredibly hostile. They called me a Jew and all sorts of stuff because I acknowledge Yahweh and Yahushua and because i don't say Jesus anymore. They say they don't care about names and pagan things that were incorporated. They say God knows their hearts and surely he doesn't care.

Yada wrote:
Christians have been conditioned to dislike and be adverse to most everything associated with Yahowah's Word. So, this hostility is the same as we have all faced. It is a direct legacy of Paul's letters.

So long as they retain their religious perspective, neither you nor God Himself will be able to help them. They will first have to start questioning their religion, which is something you can help with by planting seeds.


So hostile. Just like I was. It makes me want to work that much harder getting his name out. If I called out proverbs 30:4 in a baptist church, no one could answer. That is sad.

Yada wrote:
It is sad. And it is going to get worse before it gets better.


Anyways, I could go on. I am so blessed to know deep in my heart that I heard Yahowah's call am i am so blessed that he stayed with me through my pagan readings. I know he stayed with me because when i came your site and read the expanding of the true Hebrew words of the old testament and also the meaning of the miqra's, I had a literal light bulb turn on in my head. Now i can stop searching. Now i can get to know Yahowah the one who called me out of bondage.

So thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

KC

Yada wrote:
It has been the same for most all of us. We have all come from atheism or religion. And not only are we fortunate that Yahowah was patient with us, but we have all had the Light of understanding come to glow brightly within us as we started to observe His Torah, Prophets, and Psalms.

Yada

PS If it is okay with you, I'd like to share your letter with others in the YY Forum as it speaks to the journey we have all made from Babylon to Yah, as well as the response we usually receive when we share His Word with religious people.


KC wrote:
Feel free to share my email. Sorry for the obvious horrible grammar on my behalf as it was past midnight when I wrote the email. Thank you for responding. I wasn't sure if it would be received or lost in a jumble.

Thank You
KC


Yada wrote:
KC,

I try to answer most emails written to YY and POD. Yours caught me at the right time, so it received a prompt reply. As for your grammar, mine is so bad I didn't even notice.

Many of us have walked in your shoes, and I have found that sharing these experiences with one another is often helpful. It's one of many ways that we fellowship with one another. Your letter eloquently affirms what so many of us have witnessed along the way to Yah.

Yada

File Attachment(s):
!!! An Introduction to God.doc (2,123kb) downloaded 19 time(s).
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#227 Posted : Thursday, March 31, 2011 4:38:43 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
D wrote:
Hello Yada,

I have emailed on prior occasions; however, i understand that the volume and importance of your work can easily allow for less relevant information to get lost so i am going to try to re-introduce myself without coming across as redundant:

My name is D; I am a 19 year old university student actively trying to learn more about my relationship with Yahweh and improve it. Although sadly, I must say that in recent times I have ignorantly focused my attention onto reading about occult theocracy and secret teachings. I know that basic logic says that process of elmination is easiet when one knows well what is right rather than several things that are wrong, but I guess reading that stuff has the spooky intrigue of a scary novel that draws me to it.

Nonetheless, just as it ignited my search for truth, film has refreshed and refocussed my interest. I began to read into scripture upon the trustworthy recommendation of my godbrothers; however, i must say that JesusofNazareth1976 (as inaccurate as it may be in your eyes) was the spark. Likewise, this website link: www.gospeloftheson.com was recently forwarded to me and the visual reference helped me re-magnify the boundless importance of studying His Word. It seems like the webpage is relatively new but i think its pretty good stuff; the only problem is the membership fee (which by nature sounds exploitative but im sure the margins are minimal). Its unfortunate that it cannot be made available to everyone, especially those who cannot appreciate the value of text alone. Either way, it would be awesome if you could give it a quick look and let me know your thoughts with relation to its credibility and overall practicality. Im considering buying a membership solely just to support such a brave effort. If i do, i will email you my login info in case you want to look into it further.

On a more important note, i am considering partaking in the 7 step plan to salvation for the first time. My only hesistancy is that im self concious about my knowledge and do not feel well read enough. I feel that being ill prepared may not produce the much saught after purifying yields; i want to first sync and fine tune my mind and thought with that of Yahweh's Word before i begin. Im scared that anything less than full minded completion of this plan will be considered "working" -the synthetic, mechanical approach condemned by Yahweh himself. What is best? Does order matter?

I apologize in advance for the lengthy nature of this email. I know you prefer brevity but its the most reserved i can be contacting someone like yourself after continually struggling to find peers/family members with similar thinking to keep my spirit warm in these cold times. So thank you for listening.

Regards,
D


Yada wrote:
D,

I remember you. Welcome back.

I cannot recommend any site or film that doesn't know or use Yahowsha's actual name. Moreover, Yahowsha', while important, is substantially less important than Yahowah, so its focus is misplaced.

Further, I don't recommend using your process of elimination, as all religious are beguiling. To know Yah, you will have to flee them. And then only once you come to know Yah, is it safe to study them again as a means of helping others see that they are not good.

Your concerns over salvation are natural, but this should not be your focus. Yahowah wants you to engage in the Covenant Relationship with Him first in accordance with His terms and conditions. Once you do this, you can take the next step, which is to observe the Seven-Step Plan of Salvation He has prepared for you.

I have attached the incomplete Introduction to God because it does a pretty good job of presenting the terms and conditions of the Covenant. I'd like you to read the first 400 pages of this book, through but not past the sections on the Word, Name, Torah, Covenant, and Commandments. When you have done this, I'll direct your attention to Yah's plan of salvation.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#228 Posted : Thursday, March 31, 2011 4:39:45 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
J wrote:
Hi im a college freshman who is thinking about getting yahweh as a tattoo on my ribs in hebrew but im having trouble understanding if this action is a bad one good one or indifferent. So if you could just give me some advice on this that would be greatly appreciated. Thank you much


Yada wrote:
J,

In the Towrah, Yahowah says that He is opposed to tattoos. So while He loves His name, He'd prefer that you'd share it in conversations with others rather than by way of the tat. Also, in just over a score of years, Yah will personally write His name on your heart, so let's provide Him with a clean slate.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#229 Posted : Thursday, March 31, 2011 4:42:56 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
C wrote:
Hi Yada

Hope you are well?

By reading through your manuscripts, I realized that the translations are in-accurate and that realization made me start looking for more accurate translations.

This morning, on my way to work, I was thinking about it and maybe you have thought about it – why do you not translate the Towrah? You have done so much research, you have covered so much of the Hebrew word translations and meanings. You have no alternative motives, but the truth about Yahowah. Maybe an amplified version, as you have been translating the Hebrew text in Yada’ YHWH, Questioning Paul and Prelude to Yada’ Yahowah....?

As I have shared your work with fellow Yahuwdym, the question has been asked many times regarding a valid and reliable translation.

How far have you come in completing Prelude to yada Yahowah?


Shalowm


C


Yada wrote:
C,

The simple answer is that I can't. I'm unable to translate without commenting. I cannot restrain myself when it comes to sharing the insights I have gleaned from the passages I'm translating and those related to them. So, what I'm doing is all I'm able to do, and I'm not even qualified to be doing this.

Yada


C wrote:
Hi Yada

First – thank you for the “Introduction to God.” I can tell you that the insights you put on paper and the way you amplify the translated passages, impact greatly on a lot of people.

Secondly. Being qualified – both of us know that that is no excuse.... J When you translate and comment, maybe that is what is required, to open people’s eyes and that their minds and thoughts can be renewed. It is putting Yahowah’s words and word-pictures into the right perspective – bringing the BIG picture to more people. In my sphere of influence, I know that we are minimum 12-15 years behind you in the translating and the insight parts required to translate these scriptures.

If you are willing to take the Towrah one book at a time, translating and commenting, I will take the translated passages out and put them together – something similar to the Questioning Paul’s Galatians document I shared with you. Yes I know I am doing copying and pasting, but I know that having a true (ampliefied) version of the Towrah will benifit so many people.

(I will start with your Introduction to God manuscript and put all the translated verses into one document, then take Yada YHWH and do the same. I think you will be amazed at how much has been done by you already!)

Please think about it?

Shalowm

C


Yada wrote:
C,

I agree that qualifications are irrelevant. It's about priorities, perspective, and passion.

I don't dismiss the value of the commentary as an aid to understanding and as a means to get people to think. It's why I do it. But when I have tried to just do the translation without commenting, I've found it to be difficult if not impossible for me. It's my nature to share the insights I've gleaned. I enjoy doing so and I'm frustrated when I keep them to myself. The review I've just completed on Proverbs 3 is a great example.

James, the most engaged moderator of the YY Forum, is currently translating the Torah. He is very knowledgeable, smart, and he is equipped with great tools. Most importantly, he knows Yah and has the right perspective and attitude. I've read some of his work and it is often much better than my own. I think he is currently more than half way through Genesis. In my opinion, he is a better choice for this than I am, especially because I tend to interpret some of the words according to the way that I am led. And so while my interpretations are mostly accurate, they may not always be the most accurate possible rendering as I consistently choose translations which are consistent with the character and purpose of Yah.

My current priority is to complete the Introduction to God which will require many more months. Then I will invest at least 6 months editing YY. From there my goal is to complete a book I've started called God Damn Religion. It focuses on Scriptural Babylon and its influence yesterday and today. Then I want to add to what I've written on the Towrah and the Covenant. After that, I'd like to write a volume on the Tribulation. Then I'd like to expose and condemn the rest of Paul's letters as I've already completed the preparation and outline. So, I only hope that there is sufficient time to do all of these things.

After learning that the original Towrah is sitting next to the Ark of the Covenant below Golgotha in a rock walled room, I asked the Boss for access so that I could photograph it and translate it with His assistance. But I don't think I am the person Yah wants to use for this, if He wants to do it at all. But I remain open and willing should He allow me access.

That said, on Yowm Kippurym in 2033 we will all receive the Towrah directly from Yah. He is going to put a perfect copy inside all of us. It is how He renews His covenant.

Yada


Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#230 Posted : Saturday, April 2, 2011 8:22:35 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
M wrote:
Yada,
I have just started reading "Yada Yahweh".
I have studied the scripture all my life, (Im 50)but I had very little education growing up.
I became a "Christian" by studying the "new Testament", and not listening to what man had to say.

This brings me to a problem that I may encounter with Pauline doctrine.
(Even though I haven't read that far)
Would you be willing to HELP me work out any contradictions that I may find?
If your work sticks with the principles of the scripture, without contradiction, then I will repent. After all, it is not my rightousness that I seek, but his.
Please?
M


Yada wrote:
M,

You may want to read www.QuestioningPaul.com first in that it exposes Paul's ploy and lies. And I've attached my current draft of An Introduction to God too. It will help you understand the Towrah, Covenant, Name, and Word better.

And if you have questions that aren't answered, let me know and I'll try to help.

Also, so that you know, I have not yet edited the 2500 pages of Yada Yahweh of Pauline Doctrine. I only recently came to realize that Paul was a liar. So, there are still quotes from Paul's letters in YY. After I finish the Introduction to God, I'll correct the rest of YY.

The Greek word underlying "repent" is metanoeo. It actually means: change your thinking, perspective, and attitude. And so to know Yahowah, you will have to leave all but Yahowsha's words in the "new testament," and focus on Yahowah's Word as it is presented in the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms. And that will require you to walk away from Christianity.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#231 Posted : Saturday, April 2, 2011 8:27:38 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
S wrote:
Hello,

I'm interested in reading Yadda Yahweh but, well, I can't understand it.
I just finished reading "beginning" and the little thing in grey at the top
and I've still got no clue as to what it says. The language is simply too complex for me
and I have a really difficult time grasping semantics. (not even sure if I spelled that correctly).

Yada wrote:
S,

I concur. Yada Yahweh is a challenge to read, especially when talking about the creation accounts. So I've attached my current draft of An Introduction to God. While it may be no easier, the fact that it is focused on one subject at a time may make it easier to process.


So far All I've managed to understand is this:

God=Yahweh
Jesus = Yahushua
And Paul Sucks.

Yada wrote:
Yahowah is God's one and only name. I used to spell it Yahweh but have recently learned that Yahowah is more accurate.

The name "Jesus" was first conceived in the 17th century. It is inaccurate. The Ma'aseyah's name is Yahowsha'. It means Yah Saves.

I invested nearly a year studying Paul's letters and came to recognize that his words were in irreconcialble conflict with Yahowah's Word. And yes, that means Paul Sucks.

Once I finish writing the new book, I'll correct YY so that it is consistent with these findings.


But I don't get the overall point of what you are trying to convey. Are you trying to say
all Christians are not going to Heaven? If so how does one get into heaven? By celebrating Passover??
I'm very confused, do need to become Jewish Now? What's the deal.

Yada wrote:
While it isn't my job to determine the fate of souls, based upon what Yahowah has revealed the only rational and informed conclusion is that the religion of Christianity leads away from God and thus away from Heaven. Yahowah established a very specific set of terms and conditions we must comply with to engage in His Covenant Relationship, and He has presented us with a very specific path which we must follow if that relationship is to endure forever. Christianity denies all of these.

Your perspective has been corrupted by Christianity. Your focus should be on coming to know Yahowah first, which requires you to observe the Towrah. Second, you should be interested in knowing the terms and conditions of the Covenant so that you know how to engage in it. Then you should turn to the path of salvation, which begins, but does not end, with Passover.

The notion that observing Yahowah's Towrah, accepting the terms of His Covenant, and relying upon His Called-Out Assemblies for your salvation makes you "Jewish" is a derivative of the corruptions which comprise Christianity. The deal is: come to know Yah as He revealed Himself in His Towrah - Instructions. Accept the terms of His Covenant as they are presented in His Towrah - Guidance. Walk to Him along the path He provided and presented in His Towrah - Directions. It is that simple and that profound.


I don't want to dispute any of your research or try to justify a religion, any religion. I was just hoping you could some
how dumb down what Yadda Yaweh is all about, into say one paragraph.

Yada wrote:
If Yahowah's message could be dumbed down to a single paragraph, God still wouldn't have done so, because He does not want to have a relationship with someone unwilling to invest the time and energy required to get to know Him and relate to Him. So, I won't do it either.


Also could you answer a few questions:
is there a Heaven?

Yada wrote:
Yes.


If so ,how do i get in?

Yada wrote:
This is the wrong initial question. The right first question is: How do I get to know God? The answer is: observe the Towrah - Teachings. What makes you believe that Yahowah wants someone in His home who doesn't actually know Him? Your perspective and priorities are a legacy of Christianity.

Yahowah's answer is for you to study His Towrah. Come to know Yah as He revealed Himself in His Towrah - Instructions. Accept the terms of Yah's Covenant as they are presented in His Towrah - Guidance. Walk to Yah along the path He provided and presented in His Towrah - Directions.


If not, how do I avoid going to hell or having my soul obliterated?

Yada wrote:
Not to worry. You are not going to hell. As for not having your soul obliterated, the answer is the same as I've already shared with you.

Yah is the source of life. Separated from Him there is no life.



Does Yadda Yaweh even address these questions?

Yada wrote:
All of them. And they are the focus of An Introduction to God.


Finally, is Yadda Yaweh really 2000 pages long?

Yada wrote:
No. With the inclusion of the new Introduction and Questioning Paul, it's more like 3500 pages long. And it reveals less than 1% of what Yahowah revealed.


I get that your not trying to start a new religion and I don't need you too, but any clarity on my questions you could provide would be helpful.
Thanks.

regards;

-S

Yada wrote:
S, the new, and not yet complete, Introduction to God designed to answer your questions. It's not short. It is not easy or simple. But it does provide God's answers.

Yada


S wrote:
Hello,

Thank you for taking the time to respond,and to respond so quickly. This will likely take me a very long time to get through,
but i will attempt to read an comprehend what you have attached. I'm also only about half way through prophet of doom, which
do you suppose I should focus on first?

Thank you Again.

regards;

-S


Yada wrote:
S,

Prophet of Doom reveals the nature of Muhammad and Islam. So it tells you who God isn't. The Introduction to God relies upon Yahowah's Word to reveal who God is, what He wants, what He is offering, and how to accept His gifts. So, since knowing the truth is more important than knowing what is not true, unless you have an affinity for Islam and need to reject it, I'd focus on the truth.

And yes, reading and comprehending Yah's Word takes time. That is how He intended for it to be. You will have to open and engage your mind. There are no shortcuts. There never have been and there never will be.

Yada

Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#232 Posted : Saturday, April 2, 2011 8:31:27 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
F wrote:
Yada,

D found this while researching topics this week preparing for Friday
Sabbath. The following excerpt blows the NT out of the water. Let alone the
rest of the article. From "The Bible by John E. Remsburg"
This link is the article: http://freethought.mbdojo.com/canon.html
This link is about the author: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Remsburg

Some of what he says is still based in Christianity and the Towrah facts are
not all correct.

Have you read this and what did you think?

Below is a short excerpt from The Bible was Put Together by Vote.

F

The Christian Canon

Respecting the formation of the New Testament canon, the Rev. Dr. Roswell D.
Hitchcock says: "The new book of records was, like the old, set down by
eye-witnesses of and actors in its scenes, closely after their occurrence;
its successive portions were cautiously scrutinized and clearly
distinguished as entitled to reception; when the record, properly so-called,
was completed, the new canon was closed" ("Analysis of the Bible," p. 1149).


"This process was rapid and decisive; it had in all probability become
substantially complete before the death of John, the last of the apostles."
(Ibid, p. 1158).

That these statements, popularly supposed to be true, are wholly untrue will
be demonstrated by the facts presented in this and succeeding chapters. The
Christian canon was not completed before the death of the last apostle. The
New Testament did not exist in the time of the apostles. It did not exist in
the time of the Apostolic Fathers. It was not in existence in the middle of
the second century.

There was no New Testament in the time of Papias. Dr. Samuel Davidson, the
highest Christian authority on the canon, says: "Papias (150 A.D.) knew
nothing, so far as we can learn, of a New Testament canon." ("Canon of the
Bible," p. 123).

Justin Martyr knew nothing of a New Testament canon. I quote again from Dr.
Davidson: "Justin Martyr's canon (150 A-D.), so far as divine authority and
inspiration are concerned, was the Old Testament." (Ibid, p. 129).

For nearly two centuries after the beginning of the Christian era, the Old
Testament-- the Old Testament alone constituted the Christian canon. No
other books were called scripture; no other books were considered inspired;
no other books were deemed canonical.



Yada wrote:
F,

Yes indeed, the foundation of Christianity is mostly mythical. So while this author makes many mistakes, he has revealed considerable truth. The majority of the Christian New Testament is untrue and unreliable. It did not exist prior to Marcion. And its canonization was not Godly. Only Yahowsha's words properly translated and remembered, and then properly retained by scribes, within Mattinyahu's and Yahowchanan's eyewitness accounts and revelation can be considered Scripture and inspired. The rest is opinions (some of which have merit), human perceptions of history (some of which is accurate), and worse, blaspheme as is the case with Paul's letters, Hebrews, and most of Acts.

As an aside, the more I read from the poison pen of Martin Luther, the more I dislike him and his religion. Catholicism isn't the only form of Christianity which is errant.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#233 Posted : Sunday, April 3, 2011 7:48:28 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
D wrote:
Hi Yada and Yow'el,

I am on my final pass through the 18 or so episodes of Passover on Yada Yahweh Radio before Passover this month. In Part 3 there is quite a discussion between you both regarding new/renewed and whether this can be determined and or whether it actually matters. I got the impression that there were things left unsaid on the subject and therefore I believe that it does matter and we should look to Yahowsha's enablement of Passover in 33CE as our guide.

According to your own phenomenal Miqra'ey resource, Abyb 1 in 33CE was Friday 20 March commencing at sundown on Thursday 19 March. If this is correct, and I have no reason to expect otherwise, that makes Passover Thursday April 2nd, 33CE. Therefore Yahowsha's own example was to use the observational starting with the merest sliver of a waxing moon to designate Abyb 1.

I understand that Abyb1 is always set as the first visible sliver of a waxing moon on or following the spring equinox occuring on March 20th or 21st of each year. If so then that makes Abyb 1, 2014 as Wednesday March 30, 2014 and cannot possibly be Saturday March 1st or Sunday 2nd March, because these dates occur well before the spring equinox. The same is true for 2016.

I may have my wires crossed and have totally the wrong idea here so please tell me if that is the case. Also, if Passover always occurs on a full moon, can this not be used, in conjunction with the spring equinox date, to determine Abyb 1 each year?

On another matter, we see the US involved in yet another middle eastern folly - namely Libya, and as usual backing the wrong side. Obama has committed troops to support the "freedom fighters" as well. More blood and coin to create a fundamentalist Islamic State deadly to Yisra'el and the USA. Japanese and Christchurch earthquakes and Islamic uprising all over the Muslim world - much to talk about when radio shows resume! I cannot wait!

Yahowah's blessings to you both

D


Yada wrote:
D,

Your question is one shared by many, so I'm hoping that my answer, which is longer than your question, will help clear the air on this issue which is of concern to others. Mind you, I don't have a great answer, only some insights which reveal why no one can answer your question regarding dates and be certain. So, with your permission, I'd like to share this response in the forum and perhaps on YY Radio.

To begin, Yow'el and I agree with one another regarding most every aspect of the Miqra'ey, including the issues surrounding the challenges of setting the dates accurately. If it appeared as if we disagreed, that was probably as a result of Yow'el's style, which is to question and challenge everything. I not only like it, but I encouraged it on the program because I thought that it made the presentations more interesting. Further, it is by questioning that we learn, come to understand, and ultimately come to know and trust. Yow'el is uniquely gifted in this regard.

While it was not recorded, we discussed this subject again a few days ago after lunch--for over an hour. At issue was the fact that in 33, using the info available to us, the astrological new moon, by the slimmest possible of margins, would have put Passover on Wednesday and Thursday, not Thursday and Friday. The observational day, however, based upon the extrapolated scientific data puts Passover on Thursday and Friday, with Matsah then falling on a natural Sabbath. But there are some real and very significant issues associated with this extrapolation which were not stated in the introduction to these charts.

And as I shall soon share with you, we should question the specific dates in 33 as they are placed upon a retroactive Gregorian calendar and not accept the specifics of their extrapolated timing as if they were completely accurate and trustworthy. The fulfillments occurred to be sure, and around this time, but we have to be careful when we transition from Yah's calendar to man's.

Also relevant, in 2033 we must use the the astronomical new moon, with the moon setting just prior to its actual renewal, to have Sukah fall on a natural Sabbath. That is if the Earth remains unaltered by the events predicted to occur during the Tribulation.

While Hebcal supports both the 33 and 2033 dates whereby Passover coincided both with Yahowsha's meal and sacrifice, and both Matsah and Sukah falling on natural Sabbaths, their extrapolations are based upon rabbinic calculations, not observations. And their dates are often wrong, because they attempt to keep from having a natural Shabat and a special one fall on successive days. Moreover, there has to be some flexibility because Yahowsha' could not have celebrated the Passover meal and served as the Passover Lamb at the same time. And there in is the reason the Scriptural day begins and ends at sunset. He did both on the same day of the month, without doing them at the same time. The only way for this to work is for the 14th day to begin at sundown on what we would consider to be the 13th.

If we only rely upon the rabbinical Hebcal system, and don't think about how it was calculated, all appears well. But if we rely upon the scientific charts Yow'el has provided, we cannot achieve a consistent result. But here are some dis-qualifiers:

We cannot say for certain that Yahowsha' arrived in 2BCE. only that this is the most likely date based upon the corrected testimony provided by Josephus regarding an eclipse near Herod's death as it is compared to the eyewitness accounts. We cannot say for certain that Yahowsha' fulfilled the first four Miqra'ey in 33CE, only that this year is a better fit than others based upon the evidence I've considered. It could have occurred as early as 27 some have surmised, and many historians point to 30 CE. After all, Yah has one calendar and man uses another. They are not the same.

Also at issue here is Daniel's prophecy. The starting date is in dispute as is whether he used solar or lunar years. Personally, I am comfortable with the "prophetic year" method, and of the timing delay based upon the political history, but, the moment we begin to interpret and extrapolate, we have to be careful. Also, I like the symetry with the foundation of the Temple in 967/8 BCE, but this too requires some extrapolation to see as a valid milestone. Also, while we know that the other milestone dates are close, precision isn't possible with the evidence we have been given.

Therefore, we can say that 33 and 2033 CE on the Gregorian calendar are within three years of being accurate, and that they represent the best overall extrapolation from the evidence. What we can say for certain is that these things occurred and will occur on years 4000 and 6000 Yah. Placing them on our pagan calendar, however, it's so easy.

The scientific data displayed on the site, by the source's admission, isn't reliable much more than a century in arrears. There are too many variables, any and all of which make precise assessments unwise.

The Earth wobbles rotationally on its axis. The Earth is slowing with regard to its rotation. The Earth's obit is not consistent with regard to its position or speed. The moon is traveling away from us. The date of the equinox has evolved a couple of days from what it was back then. Weather patterns have also changed, as have sky conditions and topography.

So over the course of two thousand years, any one of these issues could alter what is reported sufficiently to make Thursday April 2nd in 33CE the beginning of Passover astronomically and observationally, or clearly one or the other. But, collectively, these many variables cause the data to be sufficiently unreliable to state with certainty that it was observational not astronomical.

The times for sun and moon set are based upon Yisra'el's time zone, but there is no way to accurately extrapolate the specific time which they occurred from the perspective of Mount Mowriyah (either actual or observational), or even determine if the perspective should be based upon the highest point on the mountain, or the Temple Mount, where the horizon is elevated by the remainder of Golgotha. The data does not account for the bending of light which makes the sun and moon appear visible after they have dropped beneath the horizon. And then there is the issue of the evolution from Julian to Gregorian calendars, which I don't completely understand. Ten days were added to accommodate Easter Sunday being celebrated near the Spring Equinox, but without changing the days of the week.

Therefore, extrapolating dates based upon fractions of 1% of renewal and fractions of a degree with regard to the time the sun or moon appears to set, isn't reliable enough to determine the dates with certainty. Moreover, Yah does not provide us with precise language in this regard--not even remotely. He left many things unsaid and subject to interpretation. And while I'm speculating here, I think He did this for a reason.

While I'm not claiming to be an expert, based upon what I have learned, I am currently convinced that we cannot say for certain when any past Miqra'ey actually began or when any upcoming Miqra'ey will begin. We can only provide tools which each of us can use to evaluate what we think is the most likely date. This is not only true with regard to the past, where we are trying to deal with a major change in calendars, but also in the future. The asteroid strike in 2029, the massive earthquakes, volcanoes, and tsunamis, which the earth will then encounter, will nudge the earth and its rotation sufficiently to make 2033's Sukah, from an astrological perspective fall precisely on a natural Sabbath. And since the moon won't be visible in the fall of 2033 due to all of the environmental issues occurring during the Tribulation, and other prophecies regarding the sky, that method becomes somewhat irrelevant.

So, I suspect that Yah uses the precision of the astrological method, which is observational to Him, rather than the imprecision of the observational method from man's corrupted and polluted vantage point. I also suspect that He chooses days in which the actual and observed dates are close, if not in sync, and that in both 33 and 2033, He was and will be precise.

In light of the fact that there are no known Levites, we don't have access to the Ark of the Covenant or the Temple, we do not live in Yisra'el, we don't grow barley, we don't butcher our own animals, we don't cook our food in the same manner, and Yah has not only said that He is tired of sacrifices, we must acknowledge the realization that Yahowsha' perfectly fulfilled the promises of the first four Miqra'ey, I think that Yah is hoping that each of us will observe the evidence He has provided, consider what He has promised and what He has done, and then think our way through His instructions so that what we do, and when we do it, serves to value, remember, acknowledge, share, explain, and rely upon each Festival Feast.

Thoughtlessly doing most of what He asked on the exact right day, hasn't saved anyone. The same could be said for circumcision on the eighth day. But, coming to understand what these events mean in relationship to the Covenant and our reconciliation, revering them, trusting and relying upon these promises, and observing them in such a way that our actions as closely as possible reflect Yah's instructions so that we tangibly demonstrate our acceptance, has saved all who have been saved. And doing what Yahowah's has asked of us is a tangible way to witness to others.

Lastly on this subject, I agree that there are some errors in the Miqra'ey chart. It's way too much data to present and not err on occasion. I'll ask Yow'el to correct the possible mistakes you have highlighted. But, please note, there is no way to precisely determine which new moon starts the new year. It can occur before or after the equinox. In fact, there is no mention of the equinox in Scripture. We are simply extrapolating based upon estimates of the barley being 'abyb around this time, while trying to be consistent. My assumption is that we should use the first sliver of a renewing moon closest to the equinox, but those directions are not written as such.

There are many thoughtful people who know Yah and who observe His Towrah who disagree with my conclusions. And they may well be right. As such, I won't debate them on this. I have only shared my personal thoughts, upon which no one should rely.

I haven't seen enough conclusive evidence in Scripture to convince me that we can or should be dogmatic with regard the the timing of the days or even years. I am only sure about the purpose and reliability of these days.

Regarding your next topic, yes, the US is backing the same side Iran is equipping with arms in Libya. The rebels are better Muslims than are those found in the regime they are fighting. There is no right side to back, only two wrong sides.

I'm looking forward to beginning the show too. We are witnessing prophecy. The first show should occur around mid April, sometime right around Passover. Now, if we only knew precisely when it is to be celebrated. (Just kidding."

Thanks for the letter, D. It's always a pleasure to hear from you.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#234 Posted : Friday, April 15, 2011 5:19:44 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
R wrote:
This is my families first year observing things correctly or attempting to. Can you lay the rules out for me on all this please? I am reading through the Pesach section of your book and it looks like this should last a week? Please elaborate on this for us.. Thanks Brother!


Yada wrote:
R,

Passover, Unleavened Bread, and FirstFruits aren't about rules, but instead about observing, understanding, and relying upon Yahowah's plan and provision. Reading the Pesach, Matsah, and Bikuwrym chapters is therefore a step in the right direction.

Observation is all about closely examining, carefully considering, and thoughtfully evaluating the available evidence, which in this case is Yahowah's Word--His Torah, Prophets, and Psalms. You can read them on your own, or you can turn to a book like Yada Yahweh were verses and commentary related to these three days are presented for your consideration.

Simply stated, Pesach, Matsah, and Bikuwrym are the first three of seven steps Yahowah provided for us to walk to Him. Pesach resolves the consequence of sin, making us immortal. Matsah resolves the penalty of sin, making us acceptable. And Bikuwrym resolves the problem of estrangement, making us adoptable.

Yada


R wrote:
I get the point of it all. You think that it doesnt matter if you do or dont the things that He (YHWH) says as long as you know the reason for the days? Come on Yada... I was trying to get a little info but you are being vague about it, thanks bro.. I will figure it out.


Yada wrote:
R,

That is what you are supposed to do: figure it out. And you do that by closely examining His Word. It's not about a set of rules to follow, but instead a set of instructions to learn from. If I or He gave you what you are requesting, you'd do what we delineated, but you wouldn't derive any benefit from doing so. And as a result, a little info is counterproductive, as it will cause you to respond before you understand, defeating the entire purpose of these days.

So, don't look for shortcuts, a list of rules to follow, or even quick, easy, or short answers. If I were you, I'd read all four chapters, collectively comprising nearly 400 pages of Scriptural insights.

The details matter, but only as they serve comprise and complete the entire picture Yahowah is painting.

Religion is about providing a little information which people can believe without thinking, and rituals for them to do as a matter of habit. Relationships require an investment of our time, and a willingness to engage our hearts and minds.

Yada

Edited by user Friday, April 15, 2011 8:38:19 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline shalom82  
#235 Posted : Saturday, April 16, 2011 3:27:06 PM(UTC)
shalom82
Joined: 9/10/2007(UTC)
Posts: 735
Location: Penna

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Quote:
Religion is about providing a little information which people can believe without thinking, and rituals for them to do as a matter of habit. Relationships require an investment of our time, and a willingness to engage our hearts and minds


A brilliant and economic use of prose. There is no ambiguity or evasion. It is clear and concise. In these 2 sentences the purpose of Torah is explained and "observe" and "do" are reconciled completely in the most complementary and symbiotic fashion. The magnitude of this response by Yada should be appreciated by all of us who covenant with YHWH.

YHWH's ordinances are true, and righteous altogether.
Offline FredSnell  
#236 Posted : Monday, April 18, 2011 4:06:48 AM(UTC)
FredSnell
Joined: 1/29/2011(UTC)
Posts: 874
Location: Houston, Texas

Thanks: 14 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
From what I can tell, the show for YY will be starting in under an hour. I hope this is true?...http://radio.yadayahweh.com/
Offline highbrow  
#237 Posted : Monday, April 18, 2011 7:43:00 AM(UTC)
highbrow
Joined: 9/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 32
Location: Montana

Thanks: 2 times
Caught some of the show today and downloaded it. Great to have them back. Have been listening to the previous programs on my ipod over and over.
Offline FredSnell  
#238 Posted : Monday, April 18, 2011 1:36:32 PM(UTC)
FredSnell
Joined: 1/29/2011(UTC)
Posts: 874
Location: Houston, Texas

Thanks: 14 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
highbrow wrote:
Caught some of the show today and downloaded it. Great to have them back. Have been listening to the previous programs on my ipod over and over.

Quote:



Hey hb, jump on in from time to time. I love learning what ppl find. Heck if you're like me you probably enjoy hearing of experiences ppl have in their every day lives when using Fathers name. Just this morning I had a guy pull up in his rig to unload a few boxes coming to me from a company he just does deliveries for. After one of my sons un-loaded his truck, i just casually said, "hey dude, you know today is Passover and what all that should represent to ppl on this planet?" To my amazement, he did! He told me about how the hebrews were removed from bondage and much more, and then, he hit me with the christian aspect of his beliefs and how when he got out of church yesterday...."woe hoss, stop right there" I told him.
While I appreciate anyone knowing what Moses through YHWH has provided, I had to stop him right there. I told him to re-read His Commandments and especially concentrate on the 4th and the 1st word of the 4th.
Look I said, do you not think our Father could have told us, to remember not to steal...to remember not to kill, to remember not to covet and so on, but NO, He told us TO REMEMBER THIS DAY. After explaining, that they had forgotten, and that we now remember. He started getting it somewhat, and then I mentioned when He got home this evening, try looking up where Christians got their sun worshipping day from. It will astonish the day lights out of you. Now convincing my family is the chore.
Happy Passover HB. I hope it's the time of your life for you.
Shalom brother!..and get on board with us. We need some new perspectives...lol.
Offline Royce  
#239 Posted : Tuesday, April 19, 2011 3:23:26 AM(UTC)
Royce
Joined: 9/2/2010(UTC)
Posts: 225
Man
Location: USA

James wrote:

There was a little more to the conversation but thats the jist of it I guess.
Offline James  
#240 Posted : Wednesday, May 4, 2011 3:15:20 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
G wrote:
Yada:

I am digesting your "Introduction to God". Simply amazing and a rude awakening.
I must tell you after the 26th paragraph I had to vomit....my insides were so twisted up and disgusted with how distructive we have
been to ourselves ! I could only think "poison control"...I had the wrong number for years...!

I really do not know how Yahuweh puts up with us. I am humbled at this point to see how critically ill I was.
I can tell you without your studies I would have never got the whole gest of everything. I am blessed to have been lead by the spirit to you....

I have known internally something was not right but did not have the clue it went so deep...and Paul just another bite of the Apple so to speak. My spirit always went
back to Psalms and I am so drawn to King David it just felt like a spirit genetic pull(force) to me. I can tell you for years I have been searching to no end for understanding and
knowledge it has broken my human spirit so....I pray all the TIME every where ... I am woken out of sleep in tears some times not knowing exactly
why but feeling an overwhelming pull to talk with Yahuweh (my spirit seems to get turned on around 2-3am)

I spend hours with your writings and Yahuweh hoping that I know Him & am known by Him. I am highly critical of myself and pray for forgiveness of my faults/daily short comings
when it comes to my relationship with Yahuweh....I have never fit in with anyone or any group in my life...it took me a long time to realize that was a good thing; since social realms tell us
other wise.

Just wanted to thank you again for all your help in taking out the wrench in the works of my knowledge and understanding of Yah's WORD.

G


Yada wrote:

G,

Welcome to the Light, to the Life, to Yahowah.

Most all who have found Him were previously sickened by religion--so you are not alone. We all injected the poison. We have all wanted to vomit it out of us. But in the end, our frustration with ourselves for having been so mistaken, is offset a billion fold with the thrill of knowing and loving our Heavenly Father and being known and loved by Him in return.

While the Introduction to God is far from complete, its mission is now complete. It is being written to introduce those who are willing to question their religious faith to God--as He exists and as He wants to be known. It was worth the effort to bring one soul, your soul, out of Babel and to Yahowah.

My hope, of course, is that when the Introduction to God is complete, once it is posted online, that many more souls come to yada Yah. And that those who already know Yahowah, will come to know Him even better as a result of this review of His Word, Name, Torah, Covenant, Commandments, Called-Out Assemblies, and Prophets.

As someone who has been earnestly searching for truth about God you have been rewarded with an introduction to Him--one that was waiting for you in His Torah, Prophets, and Psalms.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#241 Posted : Monday, May 9, 2011 4:36:14 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
Originally Posted by: N& Go to Quoted Post
Hello Yada

Well, we're still with you here in the U.K. and listening to your new radio shows, which we find most informative.

When dealing with our Christian friends, we have come up against the inevitable argument put against us, and that is that we are only accepting what we have been told, (like Bernie Madoff's auditors) as we don't actually know Hebrew ourselves.

Yada wrote:
Too bad they don't practice what they preach.


So we decided to try to learn it.

Yada wrote:
Good.


We started with learning the alph beth, (Paleo Hebrew) letters, and shapes and basic sounds of the letters. Then we found an online interlinear with the KJV/ Greek/ Modern Hebrew Transliteration/ Modern Hebrew letters/Paleo Hebrew letters version of the scriptures (for all its faults in translation) and are forcing ourselves with some difficulty to try to vocalise the words. We can pronounce words without vowels (cn prnnc wrds wtht vwlls) to some extent, and sometimes it is spot on with the transliterations given. It is in fact quite thrilling to come upon certain discoveries which seem to prove the whole thing has a pattern. Yesterday for instance we found that the Yod Hey Wah Hey of YHWH with only one letter added (Dalet) YHWDH spelt Yahudah, and that the Dalet which seems to be the shape of a tent door, seems to suggest that the word could suggest that those in a tent enveloped by YHWH are Yahudah, or even that the door to Yahwah is through the tribe of Judah. Perhaps this just imagination running wild?

Yada wrote:
That's a wonderful insight. My first thought was your concluding thought, but both are accurate. I love the symbolism of paleo Hebrew.

I reference paleo-Hebrew more in the Introduction to God than I did in YY, so I've attached it for your consideration. It's not nearly finished, but there is still lots to consider.

Can you share the interlinear you are using? What is the URL?


Anyway, the purpose of this e-mail is to ask whether you have any suggestion as to how to progress along the route of vocalising the Paleo Hebrew letters into acceptable sounds, even accepting that this is not a closed subject (Yahwah and Yahweh) being a good example. Do you know of any leads we can use in this area? In other words, what is the next stage on from just learning the shapes and rough sounds?

Yada wrote:
There is a vocalization chart in the attached book around page 48. But since the consonants are fairly well known, for the most part the vowels are: Aleph = a / e, Hey = ah, Wah = ow / u, Yowd = y / i, and the Ayin = e / a.



Any advice would be appreciated.
Well done with your work. You are absolutely correct when you say that it is only by discovering individually does one make any meaningful progress. It is absolutely shocking to begin to understand the way religion has controlled most people, and continues to put a barrier in the way to knowing our creator.


Yada wrote:
Yes, we have to individually commit ourselves to observation. But also, we are strongly encouraged to share what we have observed.


Did you happen to see the royal wedding here recently in Westminster Abbey. Did you notice the head of the Church of England (Arch Bishop of Canterbury's) fake man made golden garments of light with a huge sunburst with Mary on his back? Appalling. Did you know also that he is a member of the Druid organisation in Wales. We call him the Arch-Druid .

Yada wrote:
I did not watch it. And while I am revolted by what you have shared, I'm not surprised. Christianity is sungod worship. Thanks for sharing this. I'll find a place to use it.


Yahwah Bless.

N & J

Yada wrote:
Yah Bless,

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#242 Posted : Monday, May 9, 2011 4:38:32 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
B wrote:
Good morning Yada.

When you have time, I need help with this.
A major problem I am having w/memberes of my family is this:
I forget the exact verse, but it says no one can come to the Father unless He draws them. Then they follow with- He chose you to be saved, you have nothing to do with it.
I follow with -- If He chose me to be saved then he chose someone else to be doomed forever without Him.

My question is--if that is true, isn't the Father taking away our free will to choose?

The way I look at it is, mankind is doomed without Him. So, Yawowah has done everything for us. Inother words--here's the deal on the table. Do you want it or not?
Really need clarification on this.

Thank you Crig

B


Yada wrote:
B,

It is standard Christian thoughtlessness. The quote is from John 6:44, and it speaks of coming to Yahowsha', not Yahowah. Further, it is explained in Yahowsha's quote of Isaiah 54.12 and His explanation of it in the next verse. Yah's "teaching" is what draws people to Yahowsha'. Yah's teaching is the Towrah. So the message is, observe the Towrah - Teaching and you will be drawn to recognize Yahowsha' as Yahowah Saving us. There is no violation of freewill, only a complete abrogation of thinking on behalf of Christians who don't bother to consider the statement in context.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#243 Posted : Wednesday, May 11, 2011 3:11:11 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
B wrote:
Shalom Yada,

Can you tell me anything about the correct Sabbath? I thought I had this all settled until I was in a discussion with a Facebook friend who says a day starts at sunrise, not sunset and the Sabbath day (Saturday) that a lot of us observe is neither Saturday or Sunday as this relies on the Gregorian Calendar. She says we observe the Creator’s calendar and has given me a link to find out more about this. The link is as follows:-
www.tshuva/us/calendar/videos/three-months-video.html

I have to say I’m totally confused right now and would very much appreciate your help.

Blessings,

B


Yada wrote:
B,

There are many lost people out there promoting peculiar agendas. This is one of the more common myths. And since you can't change the mind of a person like this, the best advice I can give you is to ignore them.

The Shabat is the seventh day. That was not changed by the Julian or Gregorian Calendars. They are irrelevant. And the Scriptural day begins at sunset and ends at sunset. There is nothing more to the timing than this.

But, the timing is only 1% of the story. The message isn't when but what, how, and why. Doing nothing perfectly at the perfect time never saved anyone. Salvation comes to those who understand and rely upon Yah's message, much of which is conveyed in the Seventh Day.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#244 Posted : Wednesday, May 11, 2011 3:15:17 PM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
J wrote:
Secular humanism is not a religion by any definition: There are no supernatural beliefs, no creeds that all humanists are required to accept, no sacred texts or required rituals. Humanists are not expected or required to have "faith" in what is said by any authority, living or dead, human or "supernatural."

Definition of religion.
1
a : the state of a religious <a nun in her 20th year of religion> b (1) : the service and worship of God or the supernatural (2) : commitment or devotion to religious faith or observance
2
: a personal set or institutionalized system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices
3
archaic : scrupulous conformity : conscientiousness
4
: a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith


Let me give you a comparison . A vacuum contains nothing, no air , no molecules , nothing. But by saying that it is a vacuum , by defining it, all of a sudden it becomes something. The truth of the matter is, that same vacuum still holds no air, no molecules etc...

Regardsd
J


Yada wrote:
Hitler, Lenin, and Mao would disagree with you. It sounds to me like you haven't been to a Socialist Secular Humanist nation in full bloom as I have been many times. Man becomes god, and the cause of man becomes institutionalized. In the West, the SSH moral code is Political Correctness. It is the worship of man. So rather than making God in the image of man as traditional religions do, in SSH man is turned into God.

Mein Kampf was equal parts religious and political, as is the Qur'an. So is the Humanist Manifesto. Adam Wieshapt's strategy was to make Humanism a religion. That's why he promoted it via the Freemasons.

Yada

In actuality it takes more faith to be an atheist than a Christian. I have no respect for either position. An honest skeptic is an agnostic.
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#245 Posted : Tuesday, June 14, 2011 2:41:52 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
N wrote:
Hello mr. Winn, I don’t know if you got my message on Yada Yahweh , but I want to be sure of that. And I want you to reply about it. You have wrote “Questioning Paul”-Great Galatians Debate, where you attack Paul’s epistles as fraud Sripture but yet you quote from his letter to the Romans like an inspired writ. About number 40 being the Scriture number of completion I find it interesting that we need 40 week pregnancy to come into life,and 1000 years represent 40 generations(25-generation-like). That’s all for now. Hope you reply sir.


Yada wrote:
I do not recall receiving your letter on YY.

The answer to your question on Paul is timing. I wrote most of Yada Yahweh 2 to 7 years ago and I only came to realize that Paul was a fraud 1 year ago. So, there are many references to Paul's letters in the 2500 pages of text which need to be corrected. I began this process six months ago, but my rewrite of the first chapter of the first volume has grown into 500 pages of what will be a 600 page new book called An Introduction to God. When it is finished, I will edit all positive references to Paul's letters from the text of the other chapters and volumes of YY.

Your 40 insight is interesting. I had not thought about that comparison but it might well be by design.

Yada


N wrote:
You're right, i used microsoft outlook, and i don't know how to use it finely. But it doesn't matter. Mr. Winn, sir, i want to ask you for your permision to translate much of Prophet of Doom and some chapters of Yada Yahweh in albanian language for personal use only? I'm confronting muslims everyday but they continue to be deaf to my callings, so i need to trnaslate Prophet of Doom into albanian and deliver it to them(cuz most of them don't speak english). Actually i'm writing a book of my own under the title : "Greatest Story Ever Told-Biography of Creation"- but it gonna take me a lot of work and information,mostly historical, and i was thinking if you could help me with some informations about Black Sea civilization, cuz here in alabania we lack information and books. Also i'm making a commentary-like about Apocalypse and i have found some interesting insights, and i'm also writing some articles about Scrptures and it's events and dates.And a last thin sir, I'm very troubled with "The Secret" and their page on Facebook, and i wish you could help me cuz i'm all alone fighting against another man's doctrine and i'm convicted that it's deadly and lifeless. Coul you give me some help with this sir cuz i suffer by their foolishness and dumbness toward the Scriptures, i cry and pray fo them sir but it has no effect, they still continue to believe that nonsense"The law of attraction". I will be anxiosly waiting for you reply sir. I will aid you as best as i can sir about Yada Yahowah and the insights i've discovered will be helpful to your commentary. I just need to compile them and when they ready i will sent them to you(of course if you don't yet finished revisioning Yada Yahowah). Bye sir and we'll talk soon


Yada wrote:
You have my permission to translate Prophet of Doom and Yada Yahweh into Albanian. And please feel free to share your translation with others.

I have attached the current draft of my current book. It is more focused on the topics you are dealing with.

Yada


N wrote:
I lately thought about something related to your objections about the use of Charis by Paul, And yet this 'term' was used also by evagelists authors even by 'the beloved disciple' so are they also wrogn and shoul be condemned as 'pagans' and also througout the 'new testament writings' is the use of Hades to describe the place of suffering. Does that again make these authors 'pagans' as you proposed for Paul?


Yada wrote:
There is no amount of rationalization that makes charis an acceptable term as it is the name of the Greek goddesses. There were perfectly good Greek words to convey the concept of mercy without using the famous goddess' name. While it only appears in one comment from Yahowchanan, of which our earliest textual witness is in the third century and thus was probably added to sync "John" with "Paul," it does not appear in the other eyewitness account, that of Matanyahu. And if it did appear more often, it would only demonstrate the unreliability of the text. Yahowah expressly forbid us to use the names of gods and goddesses in this way. Period. It is wrong and two wrongs don't make a right--nor do three.

Paul's primary construct is the scheme whereby one is told to place one's faith in his gospel of grace. This is errant in every possible way. One either trusts and relies upon Yahowah's Towrah, which Paul condemns, or the object of their faith is completely unreliable. That is the truth whether Christians like it or not.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#246 Posted : Thursday, June 23, 2011 2:09:23 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
IQ wrote:
Yada

I have been studying the first 100 pages. My mind is reeling from the enormous amount of NEW information therein coming at a rate similar to a modern Gatling Gun!

The depth and breadth of your research is – to put it mildly – astounding.

No believing Christian, Muhammadan or Jew would even read your book to start with. They are ‘too far gone’ to do so.

ONLY people who have a very open mind and at least some knowledge of the Hebrew & Christian Bibles (even though in English) will be able to digest the revolutionary revelations that you are asserting.

I have learned more Hebrew words in 100 pages than so far in my lifetime.

Please forgive me if I got your message – so far - WRONG!

My understanding in a nutshell is that Yahowsha’ is Yahowah’s WORD in the FLESH.

This makes sense to me since the whole universe was created with Yahowah’s WORD.

By the way will you be joining me on Total Education Hour on 24/6?

It would be great if you can.

IQ


Yada wrote:
IQ,

I concur, as usual, with most of what you have said, albeit not everything. There is actually very little "new" information in the Introduction to God, even though most everything in it is news to most people. I am reintroducing what Yahowah revealed over 3000 years ago. But His testimony has been so twisted and corrupted by religion over the centuries that it now appears new. That said, it was new, indeed revolutionary when Yahowah revealed it. And since nothing has changed, it is as it was.

As for depth and breath, you've just begun. The real breath and depth awaits as you turn to the Torah and Covenant. You are still in the foundational sections, which strive to provide the information, background, and perspective required to properly consider and evaluate what follows.

You are correct in saying that no believing Christian, Muhammadan Muslim, or Jew would or could read this book. Religion is opposed to evidence and reason. The religious are indeed "too far gone" to even consider, much less accept, the testimony of God.

Your next statement is precisely accurate, albeit there is more to it than that. To benefit from Yahowah's testimony a person must have more than just an open mind, but an open mind is required. They must also be willing to question and reject the myriad of religious myths which permeate our culture. And they must want to know the truth sufficiently to invest the time required to learn it.

The thousands of people who have benefited from Yada Yah around the world all share these things in common. Many were Christians or Jews who recognized that there was something wrong, indeed irrational, with their religious beliefs. Most denounced their religion and became agnostics. But they have almost universally been very bright people who remained curious, especially wanting to know the answers to the big questions. And interestingly, most found Yada Yah after reading Prophet of Doom.

My hope is that you were an agnostic. I already knew that your mind is open, that you are brilliant, and that you are willing to invest the time to learn. And so, I was convinced that you could handle this material and that no matter what decision you ultimately made regarding it, after reading it you will be much better equipped to advance your life's mission.

Almost without exception, the beneficiaries of Yada Yah have done as I have asked. They tested what they were reading. They used interlinears and lexicons to look up the words for themselves. The did their homework. I would encourage you to do this as well. You won't offend me by questioning. Instead, just the opposite.

Everyone has a different trigger, IQ, something that causes them to question what they have been told. Something triggered you to question Islam, and your character drove you to find answers. And when you found them, you acted upon what you had learned.

In the Introduction to God I list many of the ways religion is wrong so that readers, who already know that religion is errant, can use these as potential triggers with those who they seek to enlighten. It also helps keep agnostics from blaming God for religious errors.

For many, by coming to know the adversarial nature of Muhammad's wannabe god, they come to know the real God. You know that Allah is not God. And while that is very important, there is something more important.

The Hebrew lexicon is special. But you don't have to learn to read or speak Hebrew to appreciate its insights. In fact, being required to look up each word and study its history is actually beneficial.

Yes, Yahowsha' is a physical manifestation of Yahowah's Word. He is the Towrah in human form. But just as Yahowah is more than His Towrah, Yahowah is infinitely greater than His diminished and set-apart material manifestation.

You have correctly understood the correlation between Yahowah's Word and the creation of the material world, and thus of Yahowsha' being the Word made flesh.

Yes, I will join you on the interview. I am looking forward to it.

Thank you for reading the Introduction to God, IQ. And thanks for asking questions. I enjoy our friendship.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#247 Posted : Tuesday, July 5, 2011 3:53:22 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
M wrote:
Dear Yada,

Greetings in Yahushua!

I'm saddened to read that you are now calling Yahuweh "Yahowah" and
Yahushua "Yahowsha'". You had the names right. Why go into error as
others have done? Yahu is the short form of Yahuweh - not Yaho. Look at
names like Eliyahu, Mattityahu and Netanyahu.

The ancient testimonies of many indicate that Yah-oo-ay is the correct
pronunciation of the Father's name. This corresponds with the spelling of
Yahuweh. The Samaritans never lost the true pronunciation of Yah-oo-ay
(Yahuweh).

Please check out:

http://www.eliyah.com/proof.htm
http://www.yahweh.org/pu...cations/sny/sn09Chap.pdf

יהושוע is the longer spelling of Yahushua's name (same name as Joshua) and
it contains two waws or vavs. They give the oo sound that is written as a
"u" in English. Yahowsha' has no "u" so it can't be right. Yahushua is
the correct spelling.

Please check out:

http://www.eliyah.com/yahushua.html

Please stay true to the true names of Yahuweh and Yahushua.

May Yahuweh bless you.

Best regards,
M


Yada wrote:
M,

I have been to those sites. Like most, there is a mix of right and wrong both in the evidence and the reasoning.

I've also been to Yahowah's Word. And based upon His Word, the pronunciation seems obvious to me. The only problem I have is why it took me so long to acknowledge this.

The simplest approach is to look at the words containing the three letters whose pronunciation is most likely to be correct. Look at Towrah. Look at hayah. Look at shalowm. Look at elowah. Look at gowym. In all of the most common and popular Hebrew words the Wah is pronounced as a "o." And over 99% of Hebrew words ending in Heh are pronounced "ah," including all of those which are best known. What are the chances that the Towrah is actually the Tureh? Or that shalowm is shalum. Or that gowym is guim?

Rabbis purposefully corrupted the pronunciation of all three letters in Yahowah's name. If we relied on them, it would be Yeveh. So, the the best approach in my opinion is to look to the words which would have been the most difficult to corrupt due to their usage, but then also examine every word inclusive of those three letters. And that is what I did.

As for Yahowsha', I examined the 262 times the name appears in the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms. Of those, 260 are written Yahowsha' and two are written Yahowshua'. And since yasha' is the Hebrew word of salvation, the choice seemed simple enough.

I have been wrong in the past, so I can obviously be wrong now. But if I'm wrong, we aren't able to properly pronounce any Hebrew word or name.

While I have attached the book (the Name section begins on page 82 and the section I pasted below begins on 133), here is the section from the Introduction to God. The section on Yahowsha' begins on page 141. If you read the Name section, feel free to point out any flaws or omissions you find in the evidence or reasoning. If I'm wrong, and if an irrefutable case can be made for what's right, I'll change instantly. Such has been my journey from Christianity to Beryth.

So here is the section of Yahowah...

In actuality, the easiest way to dispense with the “consonant” myth with regard to the paleo-Hebrew script found in Scripture is to examine the many thousands of words which contain the letters Wah (ו), Hey (ה), and Yowd (י), and consider how they are pronounced. Almost invariably, the Waw, or Wah (ו), conveys the vowel sounds “o,” “oo,” or “u.” In this regard it is similar to the vowel form of the English W, pronounced “double u.” The Hey (ה) is pronounced “ah” and to a significantly lesser degree, “eh.” The Yowd (י) communicates an “i” sound, and is otherwise similar to the vocalization of the vowel form of the English Y. In reality, these three vowels, in conjunction with the Hebrew Aleph (א) and Ayin (ע), made it possible to pronounce every Hebrew word several millennia before the Sheva System was developed, or vowel points were introduced, by the Masoretes.
With this in mind, let’s consider the three vowels which comprise Yahowah’s name. Perhaps the most familiar Hebrew word known to us today beginning with the letter Yowd (י) is “yada’ (יָדַע),” meaning “to know.” You often hear it repeated: “yada, yada, yada.” Indirectly, we know the Yod sound from Israel, which is a transliteration of Yisra’el. But it is also the source of the vowel I/i in: Isaiah (Yasha’yah), Messiah (Ma’aseyah), Zechariah (Zakaryahuw), Hezekiah (Chazayah), Nehemiah (Nachemyah), and Moriah (Mowriyah).
Those who have sung “kumbaya (quwmbayah (stand with Yah))” or “hallelujah (halaluyah (radiate Yah’s light))” know this Yowd (י) sound all too well. The י provides the vowel sound for the common Hebrew words yad – hand, yadah – to acknowledge, yatab – good, and yahad – united.
There are literally thousands of Hebrew words where the Yowd (י) is pronounced just like the Y/y is in the English words: “yes, yet, yield, yarn, yaw, yawn, yawl, yea, yippee, year, yearn, yeast, yell, yellow, yelp, yeoman, yesterday, you, young, yolk, yonder, and yummy. And just like Hebrew, in English, the letter Y is often a vowel. Consider: “myth, hymn, my, fly, and cry.” In fact, according to the Oxford Dictionary, “the letter Y is more often used as a vowel. And in this role it is often interchangeable with the letter I.” This similarity to Hebrew is not a coincidence, because Hebrew served as the world’s first actual alphabet—a word derived from a transliteration of the first two letters of the Hebrew alphabet: Aleph and Beyt.
The second and fourth letter in Yahowah’s name is the Hebrew Hey (ה). Curious as to how Yahowah’s name could be based upon hayah (היה), which begins and ends with ה, and yet most often be transliterated “Yahweh,” where the first Hey is pronounced “ah,” and the second is pronounced “eh,” I examined every Hebrew word inclusive of the letter ה – especially those words concluding with Hey. What I discovered is that just like hayah and ‘elowah (the basis of ‘elohym), the Hebrew ה is almost invariably pronounced “ah.” In fact the ratio of “ah” to “eh” in Hebrew words is nearly one hundred to one. So in hayah, Yahowah told us how to pronounce all but one letter of His name.
And yet, in the definitive statement “’elowah hayah – God exists,” all of our questions are answered. We can simply look to the title Yahowah selected for Himself in this revealing discussion, “‘elohym (אלהים) – God,” to ascertain how to properly pronounce the Hebrew vowel Wah (ו). You see, ‘elohym is the contracted, and thus less formal, plural, and thus more inclusive, form of ‘elowah (אלוה), meaning “God Almighty.” And it is in ‘elowah (אלוה) that we find definitive proof of how to properly communicate the Hebrew ו.
Ironically, even the title Rabbis ultimately pointed to add the first common singular suffix, “my” to “lord,” ‘adoni, or more correctly, ‘adonay, to replace Yahowah’s name, was derived from ‘adown (אָדוֹן), which actually helps us pronounce His name.
But there is another, perhaps even better known, Hebrew word which can assist us in our quest. Scripture’s most often transliterated title, “towrah – Torah,” meaning “instructions,” provides all the direction we require to properly pronounce the Hebrew Wah (ו) specifically, and YHWH generally. In the Divine Writ, this title for “instruction, teaching, direction, and guidance” is written TWRH (right to left as: תּוֹרָה), where the “o” sound is derived from the Wah ו.
In addition, the most oft’ repeated Hebrew word over the last one hundred generations has been “shalowm (שָׁלֹום) – peace,” where once again, we are greeted with the means to properly annunciate the Hebrew Wah ו. And I suppose Zion and Zionist, would be almost as well known. Its basis is spelled tsyown in Hebrew, once again telling us how to pronounce the Wah.
Other familiar Hebrew words which are pronounced similarly include: gowym – people (specifically Gentiles), yowm – meaning day, ‘adown – master, ‘owy – alas, ‘owr – light, ‘owth – sign, qowl – voice, towb – good, ‘acharown – last, and of course ‘elowah – God, in addition to the names: Aaron, Jonah, Job, Judah, Moriah, Zion, and Jerusalem from ‘Aharown, Yownah, Yowb, Yahuwdah, Mowriyah, Tsyown, and Yaruwshalaym.
Beyond towrah and ‘elowah (God’s revealed instructions and His title), there are forty extremely important reminders conveyed throughout the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms which serve to affirm that God’s name is pronounced Yahowah, not Yahuweh or Yahweh. While two of these, Yowb – Job and Yownah – Jonah, were shared previously, I omitted their meanings and etymology. Virtually every credible lexicon affirms that the “Yow” sound in both names is a contraction of “Yahow.” As such, Yownah – Jonah means: “Yahowah’s Dove (a symbol for the Spirit of God).” Yowb – Job is: “Cry Out to Yahowah.” But there are more.
The most famous of these is Yowceph – Joseph, meaning “Yah Unites and Multiplies.” The most important is Yowbel – Jubilee, designating the year following the passage of seven Shabat of years, where “Yah’s Godly Lamb” frees us by forgiving our debts. Every important fulfillment on Yahowah’s calendar commences not just on a Yowbel year of Freedom and Redemption, but on multiples of forty Yowbel. These include 1968 BCE (2000 years (40x50) after the expulsion of Adam from the Garden) when Yahowah affirmed His Covenant with Abraham on Mount Mowriyah. Forty Yowbel thereafter (in 33 CE (there was no year 0 in the transition from BCE to CE)) Yahowsha’ fulfilled Passover, Unleavened Bread, and First Fruits on the same mountain. And finally, forty Yowbel removed from His sacrifice (upcoming in 2033), Yahowsha’ will return to Mount Mowriyah on the Day of Reconciliations in anticipation of celebrating the Festival Feast of Shelters for one thousand years during the Millennial Sabbath.
Names which continue to echo “Yahow” today include: Yow’ab – Joab (Yah is our Father), Yow’ach – Joah (Related to Yah), Yow’achaz – Joahaz (Grasp Hold of Yah), Yow’el – Joel (Yah is God), Yowb – Job (Cry Out to Yah), Yowchanan and Yahowchanan – Johanan and John (Yah is Merciful), Yownah – Jonah (Yah’s Dove), Yownatan – Jonathan (Yah Gives), Yowceph – Joseph (Yah Unites and Multiplies), Yowram – Joram (Yah Uplifts), and Yowtham – Jotham (Yah Perfects).
Therefore, the obvious pronunciation of YHWH, written right to left in Hebrew ה ו ה י, is Y•aH•oW•aH. Mystery solved.
In case you may be wondering, the reason I have occasionally written “Yahweh” in my commentary is access. The overwhelming majority of people using search engines to find accurate information about God type “Yahweh,” because Yahowah is unfamiliar to them. So, if I did not intersperse this spelling along with the more precise transliteration, far fewer people interested in knowing Yahowah would have access to these insights. Further, since Yahowah routinely uses contractions of His name, including Yah, Yahow, Yahuw, and Yow, His Towrah affirms that He is not the least bit bothered by an incomplete or inexact pronunciation. What He is concerned about is that we know He has but one name, that we know what that name is, and that we use it.
Since Yah invented the language of revelation, we are wise to observe its lessons. In paleo-Hebrew, the first letter of Yahowah’s name was a Yad, which today is called a Yowd. It was conveyed by way of a pictographic depiction of an arm and hand, and thus symbolized the power and authority to do whatever work was required. Even today, yad means “hand” in Hebrew, and metaphorically, it still represents the ideas of “engaging and doing,” and thus of “authority and power.”
The second and fourth letter in Yahowah’s name is a Hey. It was drawn as a person reaching up and pointing to the heavens. In paleo-Hebrew it conveyed the importance of observing what God had revealed, of taking note of His greatness, and of reaching up to Him for help. Even today, the Hebrew word hey means “behold greatness.”
The third letter in YHWH is the Wah, which was called Waw in paleo-Hebrew. Its pictographic representation depicted a tent peg or stake. These were used to secure a shelter and to enlarge it. And as such, the preposition wa communicates the ideas of adding to and increasing something.
Bringing this all together, we discover that Yahowah’s name has more to do with our response to it than it does with Him. It says that He has the power, the authority, and the will to do whatever work needs to be accomplished to assist those who look to Him, who observe His revelation, and who reach up to Him for help. Those who do these things will be added to His family. They will be sheltered and become secure.
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline FredSnell  
#248 Posted : Tuesday, July 5, 2011 12:11:47 PM(UTC)
FredSnell
Joined: 1/29/2011(UTC)
Posts: 874
Location: Houston, Texas

Thanks: 14 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Again WOW!!!...You just continue growing Yada. Your wisdom you have obtained is far more than anything I have come across. Even your assesment of the news is better than anything I read. I know you hate any praise, so I'll just heep a big ole thank you, on you!
Offline Richard  
#249 Posted : Tuesday, July 5, 2011 5:54:13 PM(UTC)
Richard
Joined: 1/19/2010(UTC)
Posts: 695
Man
United States

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 7 post(s)
Shim'own Kepha wrote something to the effect of, "Though you know these things, I thought it good to stir up your remembrance." It is indeed good to have my memory stirred again be the posting of information I've already read. "They" say we learn by repetition.

I'm with you, EH. Yahowah has given His Family a precious gift and a valuable resource in brother Yada. And since he never reads the forums, we don't have to worry about him being offended at our saying so.
Offline James  
#250 Posted : Wednesday, July 6, 2011 5:47:28 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
M wrote back to Yada, and here is the latest exchange:

M wrote:
Dear Yada,

Thanks for your email. I have started reading your book and enjoy reading
your insights. Thank you, again, for the book.

Your logic on how you got to the name of Yahowah assumes that ow and ah
are the correct pronunciation of waw and heh as they are the most common
pronunciations in scripture. That, to me, is relying on statistics. There
is a degree of uncertainty. By keeping to the name of Yahuweh, I am
assuming that the Jews and Samaritans can speak their own language! That
seems to me a more reasonable assumption to make, with a higher degree of
certainty. Wikipedia says, "The Samaritans, however, derive their name not
from this geographical designation (Samaria), but rather from the Hebrew
term Shamerim שַמֶרִים, "Keepers [of the Law]". The Samaritans were also
keepers of the name of Yahuweh, as is required by their keeping of the
Torah.

The late C.J. Koster, who wrote "Come out of her, My people" and
translated "The Scriptures" said:
"Apart from Gad, the son of Ya'aqob, there was another "Gad". The
astrologers of Babel called Jupiter (Zeus) by the name "Gad". He was also
well known among the Canaanites (the Kena'anites) where his name was often
coupled with Ba'al, Ba'al Gad, which according to the Masoretic vowel
pointing in the Book of Yehoshua [should be Yahushua! :)] is pronounced:
Ba'al God."

If you have time, can you confirm that Ba'al Gad and Ba'al God are
equivalent terms? I left Christianity, and became a Messianic believer,
but many in my family are still worshiping "God". Could that be another
name for Zeus? I would really appreciate it if you could do this check for
me and if Koster is right you will need to do more editing and edit "God"
out of your book!

May Yah bless you.

Best regards,
M


Yada wrote:
M,

You missed my points. It is certain that Jews have been purposely misled regarding the pronunciation of Yahowah and Yahowsha', and since they know how to pronounce their language, the words which have the highest likelihood of being pronounced accurately are Towrah, gowym / shalowm / 'elowah / 'elohym / yowm, and the verb hayah, to be. Further, probability is the essence of logic and reason.

M, my goal here isn't to win an argument, but instead for you to understand my reasoning. What you ultimately conclude is up to you.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Users browsing this topic
Guest
14 Pages«<34567>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.