On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 9:27 PM, "TZ" wrote:

Bismillahir Rahmanir Raheem
Alhamdulillahi Rabbil Alameen
sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam


I testify that there is no Ilah but Allah, and Muhammad (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam) is His Messenger.

I, therefore, invite you to accept Islam. If you accept it, it will be good for you. If you not accept it, you will be liable for your loss in the hereafter.

-TZ
Bangladesh

Your testimony is false. Allah is not God, but is instead Satan. Muhammad was the most repulsive man whoever lived, and thus the least qualified man in human history to be God's messenger. So, as an informed and rational person, I reject your invitation. It would not be good for me, just as it is not good for you.

If Islam was good, Bangladesh wouldn't be such a horrible place to live.

Yada

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:28 PM, "TZ" wrote:

Bismillahir Rahmanir Raheem.

Bear witness that we are Muslims.

[ Say : "O people of the Scripture : Come to a word that is just between us and you, that we worship none but Allah, and that we associate no partners with Him, and that none of us shall take others as lords besides Allah. Then, if they turn away, say: "Bear witness that we are Muslims." (Surah Ale-Imran:64) ]

On the Ninth Day of Dhul Hijjah 10 A.H. in the 'Uranah valley of Mount Arafat, Rasulullah Muhammad (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam) said, "I leave behind me two things, the QURAN and my SUNNAH and if you follow these you will never go astray."

Bangladeshi people are not following Al-Quran and Sunnah properly and going astray thereby.

-TZ

T,

The "Scripture" referenced in this passage is the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms. In them, Yahuwah's name is written 7,000 times. Allah's name is not mentioned. And therefore the statement that "we worship none but Allah" is ignorant, as it is in direct conflict with the Scriptures Allah inaccurately claims to have inspired. Such is absolute proof that Islam is not true.

In the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms, "Lord" is Satan's title. It is from "Ba'al." It describes Satan's desire to be served, to be worshiped, and to lord over and control men and women. Yahuwah has no such ambitions. So by referring to himself as a "lord" Allah affirmed that he is Satan.

The reference to "no partners" is Muhammad's/Allah's attack on the Ma'aseyah Yahushua. He is however, not Yahuwah's "partner," but instead a diminished manifestation of God in human form, set apart from Yah to serve us. If Muhammad/Allah had actually read the "Ingeel" (a corruption of the Greek euangelion), as opposed to inaccurately taking credit for it, they would have realized their foolishness in making such an inaccurate claim.

"Muslim" means "one who submits," just as "Islam" means "submission." That is precisely what Satan wants, hence the title "Lord." Yahuwah on the other hand is a proponent of freewill. He knows that love requires the freedom to choose.

The Qur'an is the worst book ever written by any rational or informed standard. It is poorly plagiarized from the Talmud, repetitive to a fault, argumentative, devoid of context and chronology, inaccurate scientifically and historically, errant in all of its primary claims, not pure Arabic, but instead mostly Hebrew, violent, immoral, and hopelessly contradictory. The Sunnah, while not a book, is far worse. Muhammad's words and deeds reveal that Allah's lone messenger was a pedophile, a rapist, a sexual pervert and predator, a kidnapper, a slave trader, a liar, a thief, an assassin, a mass murderer, an egomaniac, and a ruthless terrorist. It is amazing that anyone is foolish enough to believe such a repulsive man spoke for God.

Osama bin Laden is following the Qur'an and Sunnah properly, and thus like all good Muslims, he has gone astray.

Exposing these undeniable realities is the purpose of Prophet of Doom. Too bad you didn't read it.

Yada

On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 9:51 AM, "TZ" wrote:

Bismillahir Rahmanir Raheem.

Bear witness that we are Muslims.

"T",

Like all Islamic apologists, you are unable to refute anything any informed and rational person tells you. I demonstrated beyond any doubt that your god, prophet, scriptures, and religion are false, and yet the best you can do is say that you are a Muslim--one who submits to their nonsense.

I pity you. You have squandered your soul and surrendered your mind.

Yada

On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:16 AM, wrote:

Dear Evil man:

It's hard taking someone serious who says that they were hired by God and then
given a promotion or take serious someone who is guided by such evilness.
There's no need to be so disrespectful towards the Prophet SAW or the Holy
Quran. Im sure you cant help your lack of understanding of this religion

but you can help the unnecessary manor in which you write about it.
Maybe it bothers you that for so many people, the prophet SAW is so beloved and
held as an example or that to Muslims the Holy Quran is regarded as such a
sacred and eloquent text.
I'm sure you dedicated many years in your study of Islam but yet you're as ignorant
as most. Maybe your evilness makes it impossible for you to comprehend it.
Reprinting hadiths doesn't take much nor does it point to some insight on your
part. And when you use your own words that's
when your ignorance and mean-spirit becomes too apparent.

Everyday someone is converting to Islam. Everyday the Quran is being studied,recited and learned.
Everyday someone is implementing the ways of the Prophet SAW into their
everyday life. And everyday someone such as yourself is trying to discredit
this religion. But it's impossible to discredit the truth. That is why from
the time of the prophet SAW up until today Islam keeps getting stronger and is
always spreading, because it's the truth.

from a muslim!

On Oct 4, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Prophet of Doom <email@prophetofdoom.net> wrote:

Dear Muslim,

God did not have to hire me, just ask. We have a very close and personal relationship. After all, He is my Father.

Since I (and He) find rape, incest, pedophilia, adultery, thievery, slavery, kidnapping, deception, mass murder, war mongering, and terrorism as evil, it's hard not to be disrespectful towards Islam's lone prophet, as he did all of these evil things. The question is, why do you trust a terrorist, mass murderer, deceiver, kidnapper, slave trader, thief, pedophile and rapist with your soul? Are you so ignorant of what is known about Muhammad from the earliest Islamic sources that you don't know that he was among the most repulsive and vicious men whoever lived, or are you aware that he was a bloodthirsty pervert and believe God condones such behavior? Those are, after all, the only informed choices.

And how is that that the single best documented, most comprehensive, chronological and contextual presentation of the Hadith and Qur'an is "ignorant?" If one cannot know Muhammad through these sources, then he cannot be known. You speak of learning the ways of Islam's prophet, and following them, and yet there are no better, more reliable, or older sources of sunnah.

You obviously don't like the fact that I did the informed and rational thing, and not only printed the most reliable and oldest Hadith, but that I also used them to put the Qur'an in chronological order, and into the context of Muhammad's life. Because by doing this, I prove that Muhammad was repulsive and that the Qur'an is rubbish. And that's pretty hard on your religion's credibility as it is destroyed by the truth.

All those who "implement the ways of Islam's prophet into their everyday lives" become sexual perverts and terrorists. How is that a good thing?

Yada

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:07 AM, wrote:

I apologize for calling you evil. You are stupid. That's a more befitting description. There's nothing comprehensive in your writings. Just by you trying to add context and chronology to the Qur'an shows how stupid of a man you are. You use vulgar language when talking about Islam in replace of intelligent commentary, again showing your stupidity. You say you have a close relationship with God, I think not. Humility is a characteristic of one with knowledge and understanding of God, not stupidity and arrogance.

You simply serve as proof that fools are easily fooled.

Outstanding response, Muslim. Your arguments are brilliant, topical, cogent, informed, and rational. I am humbled by your superior knowledge and intellect and must beg for mercy. I'm sure your god is proud of you.

Yada

On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:58 PM, "A" wrote:

May god guide you to the right path , the prophet miracle was al quran in its native arabic, and because you are not arabic native speaker and you probably read translation of the holy book you are missing the beauty and the power of it words. Only native arabs , can enjoy how beautiful is to hear the recitation of the holy book. I have no doubt in my mind that i am on the right path not because of what i learned or was born with or how my parents raised ,but because when i hear the recitation of the holy book in its arabic form , with my all of my heart i say yes i believe. We were born to worship. I think the 10,000 hours you spent studying went to waste just because you end it up with this impression. i suggest you spend some time reading from islamweb.net or from youtube lecture of ahmed deedat. I have nothing else to add, i just delivered my message.

Congratulations. You, like all Muslims, completely ignored the criticism I leveled at each of the statements you made in your letter to me. Allah has obviously guided you to a place which has made you incapable of thinking. It is what religion does best.

Recognizing that you don't have a valid defense on any of the topics you, yourself, raised, you simply changed the subject. And like all Muslims, each new argument you have brought forward is invalid.

Considering this sorry state, nothing any informed and rational person tells you will prevail. You have chosen to believe a lie, even when that lie is exposed before your very eyes--on the very topics you were most confident in raising.

The only miracle associated with the Qur'an is that anyone on earth believes that this rubbish was inspired by God. Simply stated, by any rational criterion, the Qur'an is the worst book ever written. It is repetitive, contradictory, argumentative, plagiarized, jumbled, immoral, inaccurate, warmongering, and uncivilized.

Most every important word in the Qur'an is Hebrew, not Arabic. Qur'an itself is from the Hebrew qara', meaning to read and recite. So the basis of your point is invalid. Moreover, rhythm is not a substitute for truth.

The God who inspired the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms encouraged people to translate it into every language, because Yahuwah knows that its truth and beauty can be made known in any dialect. Allah, however, wrote so poorly, Muslims know that when the Qur'an is translated out of the deficient language of paleo-Arabic, into the languages of enlightened people, Allah is made to look like a fool. Moreover, no one can read or recite the Qur'an in paleo Arabic because the script lacks vowels. The Qur'an you, yourself, recite is a translation.

You are a Muslim because your parents were Muslims, and because you haven't bothered to evaluate the validity of the lie to which you were subjected. And that is why Yahuwah wrote that parents condemn their own children.

You believe out of emotion. You do not know. Religion is believing. It is the inverse of knowing.

When the Qur'an is reordered chronologically, when it is set into the context of Muhammad's life, when it is compared to the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms, the only informed and rational impression/conclusion which can be drawn is that it is a lie from beginning to end. But you, rather that considering the oldest and most reliable evidence, the hadith from Muhammad and his companions, would prefer to listen to the lecture of an Islamic apologist. While that's a dumb choice, at least it is a choice.

Yada

I suggest that you read Prophet of Doom, and come to know who Muhammad actually was and what he actually did. If you can remain a Muslim after learning the truth, then at least for the first time in your life, you will have made an informed decision.

Yada

Some of these just crack me up. I love it!

HI,


Please be so kind to and help me with this question: Why did Yahshua tell his disciples to carry swords?

Luke 22:35 Then he said to them: "When I sent you away without a purse or bag or shoes, did you lack anything?" No, nothing, "they replied. 36 "But now," he said, "it must have a purse, take it. The same must have a bag, and whoever has no sword, will sell his garment and buy one. 37 For I tell you that it must be fulfilled in me, that word that is written: He was numbered with the transgressors. For it is certain about me, should now be completed. "38 They said," Lord, behold here are two swords. "Enough of this!" He replied.


"The teachings of Christianity and the Bible are dissimilar things. The religion of Christianity as it is taught and observed has surprisingly little in common with Yahweh's Scripture. In fact, Yahweh is anti-religious. He hates false teachings, especially when they are spoken in His name."

Is the bible mistranslated? (From Hebrew)


Best Regards -P

P

Unlike Allah, Yahushua didn't tell those listening to Him to buy a sword so that they could go out and kill anyone, and in fact, specifically denounced the use of all forms of violence. In this regard, His testimony is the antithesis of Muhammad and his pal Allah. Further, the "sword" in Luke 22.36 isn't actually found in the oldest manuscript of that verse, and in those in which it appears, it is a machaira, which is from mache, meaning to bring division by way of disputes so as to point out the variance between religious and political agendas. It was symbolic of Yahushua saying that He came to bring division, pointing out the differences between Yahuwah's testimony and conflicting political and religious dogmas.

The context of the discussion is sufficient to demonstrate the symbolic use of the word. Yahushua is not speaking of fighting or killing or conquering, but instead about using their past experiences with Him to predict the future when engaging as His witnesses. The message is perfectly clear, and it has nothing to do with weaponry.

That said, the oldest Greek manuscripts prove that much has been added and changed, so it is perilous to site a passage spoken in Aramaic, translated to Greek, routinely altered for political purposes, translated into Latin, and then translated into English, and think that it is remotely accurate.

Yada

On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:49 PM, "AF"> wrote:

Mr. Winn,

I have just read your book "Prophet of Doom". I appreciate the effort it took to do the chronology and translations. My only criticism is relative to the sarcasm. I think It would be a much stronger book without the snarkey comments. Anyone with the intelligence and discipline to read anything about Islam has enough sense to make the comparisons without the sarcasm or at least to have the wit to add their own. Otherwise it is a fascinating chronology. I would never have been able to do it on my own.

A,

You may be right (and I've considered removing some of my judgmental comments and harshness), but far more people have written me to say that without the sarcasm, without humor, it would have been impossible to endure 1000 pages dedicated to Allah's and Muhammad's rubbish. While popularity is never a gauge of right and wrong, for every letter I've received critical of my attempts at humor, I've received a hundred in support of it.

In that light, God Himself has a sense of humor, and He uses sarcasm on occasion--not to mention, He is very judgmental. And it was for Him that I compiled Prophet of Doom. But that is not to say that I wouldn't accept or promote an edited version of Prophet of Doom, one without the "snarkey comments." If you edit them out, I'll see that the sanitized version is posted. In fact, with every translation of the book, I tell the translators that they are free to remove anything and everything from the book that they find offensive, especially my humor. And yet all of them have told me that without the humor, they wouldn't endure the process.

You may be surprised by this, but religious people aren't able to process evidence rationally. Very, very few religious people are capable of thinking logically. No amount of irrefutable evidence or unassailable reason is sufficient to cause them to abandon their faith. And scholars, as a result of political correctness, are seldom judgmental, so knowing the real Muhammad isn't of any value to them. So, that is why the judgmental tone and humor remain. Although they diminish the book's effectiveness in some circles, these things serve others.

I knew little of Islam and wasn't particularly interested until the GZ mosque came up. Imam Rauf''s determination to place the mosque there seemed unreasonable and inexplicable for a man from a religion of peace. I started searching and it wasn't long before two things happened, the first was that a friend sent me a copy of the Qur'an translated by Abdul Hye PhD. I began to read it and it seemed disjointed and as though parts were missing.

So much of what is comprised in the writings of Islam is disgraceful and at times so sickening as to make it difficult to continue reading. The repetitions and the graphic violent depictions make it a real matter of discipline to get through it.

I would like to see the Florida pastor use the publicity he has attracted to make the Qur'an known with all of it's violence and inhumanity exposed. Whether he has his congregants read from your book or even the Hadith in all its gore or gives out the URL for "Prophet of Doom". He needs to change his direction , let the American people know what a horrific sham Islam is.

I wish you could get involved. This is an instance in which someone with your knowledge of Islam might be of great value. The right person at the right place at the right time.

I have a large email list of friends and am sending a short essay about this issue and adding the URL for "Prophet of Doom". I hope that helps a bit.

I have never felt so helpless about an issue of such importance.

Thank you
-AF

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:43 PM, "BH" wrote:

informed discussion with a stupid fucken statue worshipper. what in the fuck makes you think that your dumb statue worshipper ass needs to engage in informed and rational discussions. you are a fucken lower caste hindu that for some odd reason or reasons has somehow convinced himself that he's an upper caste hindu and your narcissistic tendencies are amazing to me. I can't believe that someone with a brain believes in that shit. fucken hindu get rid of those fucken statues you dumb statue worshipping asshole.

-b

B,

I'm pretty sure I understand the word "stupid." After all, you define it.

As for "fucken," you may want to consider using spell check and then a moral compass.

While there are some Catholics who venerate "statues," they don't actually worship them. Some Hindus, perhaps, but even they would claim to be honoring the spirit behind the visual representation. The most overt "statue worshippers" today would be Communists. They elevate their leaders to the status of gods. I, however, am not a Catholic, Hindu, or Communist. I don't worship anything.

But since you brought it up, why do Muslims prostrate themselves to a Black Stone in a stone shrine which was once the home of 360 pagan idols? Just because Muslims are unable to carve stones into statues, does not make the Black Stone or Ka'aba any less of an object of "statue worship." Something to think about when you are building a straw man argument.

As for "ass," Yahuwah, speaking prophetically of Muslims, the spiritual descendants of Ishmael, revealed: "The messenger of Yahuwah said to her (Hagar) further, 'Behold, you are with child, and you shall bear a son. You shall call his name Ishma'el, because Yahuwah has heard of your affliction. And he will be a wild ass of a man. His hand will be against everyone, and everyone's hand will be against him. And he will live in hostility with his brothers." I'd encourage you to have someone read that to you while you stare in the mirror. Or simply compare God's prophecy to any recent newspaper account regarding Islamic jihadists.

I have yet "to engage in informed and rational discussions" with Muslims because, like you, they are incapable of it.

Next time you attempt to criticize someone, you may want to learn something about them first. I'm not a "fuken lower caste hindu." You are 0 for 4 on your list. But, it gets worse, I haven't "somehow convinced myself that I'm an upper caste hindu," either. I'm not Indian, nor Hindu. And I'm opposed to all religions and all forms of human oppression--which is why I'm opposed to Islam/Submission.

Considering your spelling of "fuken," I'm surprised that you could spell "narcissistic." But alas, you have used it incorrectly.

Your hatred of Hindus, which I suspect is really animosity toward Indians, is repulsive. Indians have bent over backwards to tolerate and accommodate Muslims--who have done nothing but kill and abuse them for the past 1300 years.

You may want to consider getting rid of your hatred, your racism, and your statue-worshiping religion.

Yada

> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:05:50 -0700
> Subject: Re: IQ's response to my email paraphrasing your comments about
> IQ --"JM"
> From: email@prophetofdoom.net
>
>
> JM,
>
> The point I was trying to make is: Muhammad=the Hadith=the
> Quran=Allah=Islam=Sharia=Wahabism=Islamic Terrorism. People are willing
> to expose and condemn Sharia and Wahabism because most audiences are
> unaware that they are nothing more than an extension of Muhammad's
> words and deeds. Muhammad was the personification of Allah, Allah's
> creator, his only voice and messenger. The Qur'an is from Muhammad in
> the voice of his wannabe god persona. Muhammad and Allah are the same
> person, sharing the same attitudes and ambitions. Allah is inseparable
> from Muhammad.
>
> Audiences are uncomfortable criticizing a religion, or even listening
> to someone who does. So by criticizing Sharia and Wahabism, audiences
> come to believe that these things are a corruption of the true
> religion, and thus appropriate to condemn. But in fact, they are the
> truest expression of the religion as it was lived and taught by Islam's
> lone messenger. Therefore, it is good that IQ speaks of Sharia and
> Wahabism, as that will enlarge his audience, especially if he makes the
> connection to fundamentalist Islam, to Muhammad himself, after he has
> done so.
>
> One of the reasons that I have survived when people doing far less have
> been killed, is that by drawing attention to me Muslims draw attention
> to a foe they cannot refute--the oldest Islamic sources: the Qur'an and
> Hadith. So by basing everything I wrote on documented evidence from the
> Hadith and Qur'an, Prophet of Doom's credibility and validity had
> nothing to do with me and everything to do with Muhammad, someone
> Muslims cannot refute, and it also made it counterproductive for
> Muslims to bring attention to this evidence by killing me. If IQ does
> the same thing, he too will survive it.
>
> Yada
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Yada
> > wrote:
> JM,
>
> IQ's references to Sharia will help him in PC environments, where
> criticizing a religion is not allowed. So, my only thought here was to
> tie Sharia to the Hadith, the Hadith to Muhammad, and then Muhammad to
> fundamentalist Islam. They are all one in the same.
>
> With Wahabism, the historical connection between cleric and now king,
> Wahab and Saud, is as important as tying Wahab to the salaf Hadith.
> That way people will come to understand how Arabia became Saudi Arabia
> and why Wahabism is nothing more than fundamentalist Islam--which is
> based upon the Hadith. Too many people think that Saudi Arabia is a
> country allied with the West in fighting Islamic terrorism, when
> instead it is a private estate committed to promoting Islamic terrorism
> by promoting salaf/fundamentalist Islam.
>
> You and I did 1500 one hour long radio shows Jerry, and yet IQ is
> right. For the most part, I was not listened to. And even today, there
> are very few people willing to talk about Muhammad's willingness to
> rape, murder, rob, enslave and terrorize, or that Islam cannot be
> separated from Muhammad. He was a terrorist so Muslims are terrorists.
> Understand Muhammad, and you will understand Islam, the Qur'an, and
> Allah.
>
> I am not surprised that IQ is threatened by Muslims. As an Arab/Persian
> Iraqi, and as one who was raised in an Islamic nation, and as someone
> living in London, he is at greater risk than I am. I'm glad that he is
> using a pen name. I am appreciative and respectful of his courage.
>
> IQ writes brilliantly. He is very well informed. He is relentlessly
> rational. So I did not mean to infer that he could or should learn
> anything from me or from Prophet of Doom. I was just encouraging him to
> use it as a resource to expose Muhammad, the Hadith, the Qur'an,
> Sharia, Wahabism, and fundamentalist Islam. POD's only value to IQ is
> that it uses the four best and oldest Hadith sources to reorder the
> Qur'an chronologically and to set it into the context of Muhammad's
> life. Apart from investing the thousands of hours to do this for
> themselves, this is the best way for IQ's audience to understand
> Muhammad, Allah, the Qur'an, and the religion of Islam. So as he is
> stating his conclusions, IQ may want to reference the free book as
> evidence, as proof from Islam's best and oldest sources that his
> comments are valid.
>
> Based upon the article you sent me, I'm convinced that IQ already knows
> everything he needs to know to deliver this message effectively. And
> that is a rare commodity. Most people start preaching before they
> properly prepare.
>
> IQ is the right man for this mission.
>
> Yada
>
> PS: If you share this email with IQ, which you have my permission to
> do, please ask him to refrain from demeaning Deuteronomy until such
> time as he comes to understand the Torah better. I realize that like
> Ibn Warriq, by doing so he is seen as more scholarly and even-handed in
> pc circles, but the comparison between the Torah and Islam is not even
> remotely valid. If IQ would like to know the Torah better, if this is
> of interest to him, please encourage him to consider
> www.YadaYahweh.com.
>
> Yada
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:58 AM, "JM"
> > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> From: "IQ"
> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 1:49 PM
> To: "JM"
> Subject: Re: Yada's feedback
>
>
>
> -J
>
>
>
> What a dissertation. WOW! and all of it is true!
>
>
>
> I shall do my best at reformulating the manner of my analysis of Sharia.
>
>
>
> I have read every word you wrote carefully and shall act upon almost
> all Yada's suggestions.
>
>
>
> Yada's voice was the first that BLUNTLY addressed the issues of
> Muhammad's DEPRAVITIES after 9/11 BUT was NOT listened to!
>
>
>
> In his 'letter to the reader' he predicted exactly the SAME attacks
> that were levelled against him and myself.
>
>
>
> I thank you for TRUSTING me with his message and please convey to him
> my gratitude for his valour and knowledge.
>
>
>
> I shall most certainly LEARN again from his book that I have had with
> me since 2003.
>
>
>
> God bless you all
>
>
>
> IQ
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:02 PM, "JM"
> > wrote:
>
> IQ,
>
>
>
> I hesitated to email you this but later decided it might be beneficial
> to you and the work you are doing.
>
>
>
> Yada informed me that he appreciates your bluntness and logic
> that he finds similar to his own style.
>
>
>
> He hopes you can focus more on the fact that Sharia is based upon the
> Hadith, and the Hadith affirm that Muhammad was a sexual pervert and
> terrorist.
>
>
>
> Yada also would encourage you to use the Qur'an to explain why there
> are no moderate Muslim voices, much less influential leaders. He did
> like who you understand and teach why Islam cannot be moderated, which
> is correct, although he wished you had explained why an Islamic
> reformation would be counterproductive. These are genuinely central
> issues that he is delighted to see someone else addressing. Yada
> particularly liked how you correctly teach that a "moderate" Muslim is
> a person who IGNORES much of what their religion teaches and demands.
>
> Yada is resolute in his believe that Sharia (which is based entirely
> on Hadith, and mostly Muhammad's example) is proof that when Muslims
> protest that they only consider the Qur'an, they are blatantly lying.
> Prophet of Doom focuses on Muhammad because Muhammad is the focus of
> Sharia, and Sharia is the foundation of Islam.
>
>
>
> So, if you could focus more on Sharia, Prophet of Doom should be a very
> good resource for you to use as it uses the Hadith to reorder the
> Qur'an chronologically and set it into the context of Muhammad's
> life--and as such, it serves as the best window into the basis of
> Sharia.
>
> Yada’s view is that Wahabism is simply fundamentalist Islam. It is
> inseparable from the Sauds, because the Saud Wahab alliance is how they
> came to own/control Arabia. It is salaf/ancestor Islam, which means
> that Wahabists, like those who promote Sharia, believe that they are
> called to follow Muhammad's example as it is presented in the Hadith.
> That being the case, reading Ishaq's Shira/Biography and Tabari's
> Tarikh/History, or Prophet of Doom which combines them around the
> Qur'an, is essential to understanding the perverted and violent nature
> of Islam. These sources prove that Islamic terrorists have not
> corrupted their religion, but instead, Islam has corrupted them. Simply
> stated: All good Muslims are terrorists because Muhammad was a
> terrorist.

As for "fucken," you may want to consider using spell check and then a moral compass.

I noticed the spelling is different from what we have seen before, is this a new discovery?

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 2:10 AM, STM wrote:

I think it extremely pathetic and irresponsible on your part to have put yourself in danger. It’s not what your site contains or tries to prove; the only thing it proved was your hatred and bigotry towards the faith of world’s 1/3 population. Sporadic use of verses taken out of their context, and traditions which are debated over in different Islamic schools of thought was fairly weak at your end. Your website not for once led me to question a belief system but has led me to question your state of mind and your intolerant way of life.

There are good and bad in every society, you seem to exemplify the “bad” of your society. Before cutting and pasting bits and pieces of information from here and there, one would think that common sense would lead one to justify its claims through pure reason and logic. Seems you lack both, intellect and reason.

I wish you all the best in your endowers, good luck in what “truth” you’re searching for and hope your soul finds peace.

The irony of all of this is that somewhere a mother has lost her child, a spouse, their better half and a child, its protector just to have their souls watch people like you turn the meaning to their sacrifice to dust.

I sincerely hope you find peace as the only thing the likes of you has contributed to society is hate. Sleep peacefully as someone died just to have people like you undo their sacrifice.

Regards,

STM

STM,

Like all Muslims, your criticism of Prophet of Doom is unfounded. Rather than "take sporadic verses out of their context, and traditions which are debated in different Islamic schools," the book is the result of doing the opposite. It is the best documented, most comprehensive, contextual, and chronological presentation of Islam's five oldest and most credible sources ever compiled. So this being the case, why were you compelled to lie on behalf of your religion? Are you incapable of defending Muhammad, Allah, the Qur'an, the Hadith, and Islam, and repudiating the 1000 pages of Islamic citations in Prophet of Doom, using evidence and reason?

I did not criticize Muslims, but instead Muhammad and his religion, Islam, and thus there is no "bigotry" in the book. As for hatred, I hate the fact that over a billion people believe the rubbish of a pedophile, rapist, slave trader, kidnapper, thief, liar, assassin, mass murderer, and ruthless terrorist: Muhammad.

Being "intolerant" of ruthless, deadly, destructive, and deceitful dogmas like Islam which are merciless and beguiling, is among the most loving, compassionate, wise, and courageous things a person can do. And the only reasons Prophet of Doom didn't lead you to question your religion are that your religion does not tolerate being questioned and you didn't actually read the book you have ignorantly criticized. If your mind was open, if you could process evidence rationally, if you read the book, you'd no longer be a Muslim.

Prophet of Doom does not compare the relative "good and bad in every society," but instead uses the oldest Islamic sources to prove that Muhammad was mostly bad. By not recognizing this, the "reason and logic" you seek, you obviously lack.

Lastly, I have found "peace," and I "was not irresponsible putting my life in danger," because I know and serve Yahowah. As God, He is the opposite of Allah. He is the living embodiment of "reason and logic."

As for the irony of your lost child, I hope you discover the actually irony in Islam.

Yada

December 6, 2010

Dear Mr. Winn,

Your book Prophet of Doom, and the associated website are awesome!! You are a modern day Paul Revere!

As a retired U.S. Army Special Forces Green Beret, a graduate student (with only six classed remaining!) in Terrorism and Counter-terrorism Studies (emphasis on Islam) at Henley-Putnam University, and presently serving as a federal law enforcement officer with U.S. Customs and Border Protection, I want to take a moment to acknowledge the incredible scholarship of work that you have done over the years in exposing the truth behind the totalitarian ideology of Islam. The breadth and depth of your is just incredible as is your attention to detail and easy writing style makes the pathetic 1400 year history of Islam come alive! Your book 'Prophet of Doom' should be required reading (based on critical thought) in all American universities.

Quite frankly, I was initially skeptical about your personal background, intent, sources, methods, and content, but the more I studied and researched your work, I soon came to realize that your work is the "Rosetta Stone' of understanding our Islamic enemies. Your ground breaking book "Prophet of Doom" is nothing short of brilliant and 'should have rocked the Western world' when it was first published in 2004. Unfortunately, to our great detriment, the West was asleep then... and is still asleep now.

Our political elites and the American people continue to be willfully ignorant to the existential threat that Islam poses to our great nation (and all Western nations around the world). And just when I thought things could not get any worse, our liberal American neighbors voted another dhimmi apologist for Islam into the Oval Office who is doing everything he can to undermine our Constitution and our American way of life. Since taking office, Obama's misguided actions in support of Islam have greatly weakened our national security, alienated our friends and allies abroad, and emboldened our Islamic enemies worldwide. For these actions alone, I believe a strong case can be made his impeachment for sedition and treason in wartime. If that isn't enough, the vast majority of the American people are ignorantly complicit and have not even noticed! They still cling to the mainstream propaganda that Islam is a 'religion of peace that has been hijacked, twisted, and distorted by a few radicals within!' Our politically correct and multiculturally sensitive American society and the mainstream media will not even allow anyone to tell the truth about Islam without starting a 'feeding frenzy of character assassination' and accusing them of being "Islamophobic," a "racist," or a "bigot." It is obvious that the truth about Islam is the new hate speech! Our Constitution, in particular our First Amendment, is being threatened from within by many of those who have sworn to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States!

Mr. Winn, please accept my heartfelt thanks for everything you have done, and continue to do to expose the truth about Islam, a dangerous ideology of hatred, bigotry, racism, domination, submission, and outright coldblooded murder!

Never give up the fight... at this time in her history America needs great men of your mettle - you are a true American Patriot!


Most respectfully,

RS
USA, SF, Ret.
'De Oppresso Liber'

RS,

If only there were a thousand people like you, who knew the truth and were not afraid to act upon it, they would inspire ten thousand. And ten thousand would enlighten and motivate one hundred thousand who would change the thinking, attitude and perspective of a million. Our nation, and indeed the world, would be saved from the despicable, destructive, and deadly disease known as Islam - Submission.

I pray that your letter is disseminated far and wide. Perhaps then, the apathy and ignorance, and indeed irrational immorality, which permeates the mindset of so many people poisoned by political correctness today will be replaced by individuals who are not afraid to learn the truth and who are willing to respond morally and rationally to it.

Yada

On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 5:08 AM, "JA" wrote:

To Yada,


This is "JA". I wanted to renew my challenge to you to meet in a formal debate about your book.

For months, I tried in vain to have you debate your own book so you can prove to all, through defeating a Muslim author of around 100 books and booklets about Islam and prove Islam's terrorist dogma. You refused. Then came that short radio debate on the Mike Ghalagher show, and most people though you did not do well

I am offering you a new opportunity to prove your book contains truths about Islam. Can you answer this challenge by saying 'yes'?


JA

Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:43:20 -0800
Subject: Re: From JA
From: email@prophetofdoom.net
To: JA


JA,

When you "debated" Yada, you were deliberately deceitful, lying about the existence of the passage he cited. You, therefore, lost the debate, and at the same time disqualified yourself from any future debate. You proved that you cannot be trusted.

But since you remain full of yourself, feel free to refute the 1000 pages of evidence Yada cited from the five oldest and most credible Islamic sources in Prophet of Doom, proving your arguments by accurately citing equally credible and reliable sources, and without contradicting your prophet and god. Thousands have tried, and none have prevailed. You won't be the first.

POD

On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 4:12 PM, "CB" wrote:

Hey Yada,

I just stumbled onto your site and have started reading.
Here is my question. In your "Letter to America" you state that you are a Christian.
Is that still the case?
I plan on reading your books, but was curious.

Thanks

-CB

C,

I don't recall stating that I am a Christian. I was a Christian, but I left the religion per Yahowah's instructions around seven years ago. So, if the letter says that "I am a Christian," it is no longer accurate in that regard.

Christianity, and especially Paul, are in irreconcilable conflict with the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms--and that means that they cannot be true. God wants us to walk away from Babylon before we walk to Him. And Babylon is man's caustic brew of religious, political, economic, and military schemes.

Yada

On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 8:21 AM, "CB" wrote:

I don't want to bother you, but I have some questions.
Who is Jesus? Do you believe in the four gospels?
What would you recommend I read to fully understand where you are coming from?
Do you go to church? Is Acts truthful?
Did the Messiah die for our sins and raise from the dead. Is salvation found in Him?


Thank you for you reply.

-C

C,

No one named "Jesus" lived prior to the 17th century. The Ma'aseyah's name is Yahowsha' - meaning Yah Saves. He is the diminished manifestation of Yahowah, set apart from Him.

Gospel is a pagan term. Yahowha's words, accurately remembered, accurately translated from Aramaic to Greek, and accurately retained by scribes (something we know did not occur), and then accurately translated into English from the oldest manuscripts should be considered inspired. But the rest of what Mattinyahu, Yahowchanan, and Shim'own Kephas (Mark is actually a compilation of Peter's reflections) are human observations. Luke has merit, but since he was influenced by Paul, I am especially careful when I read his letter.

Read www.YadaYahweh.com and www.QuestioningPaul.com. With a few exceptions, they accurately reflect what I've come to know about Yahowah. I am currently rewriting the book to remove all positive remarks about Paul's letters (as I was fooled by him until recently), all references to the "Renewed Covenant" (because it has not yet been renewed), while correcting the transliterations of God's names and titles based upon what I've learned.

While I was once an ordained ruling elder in the Presbyterian Church and an Evangelist, I no longer go to church. I am overtly opposed to the Christian religion because it is untrue.

The first six or seven chapters of Acts appear to be reasonably accurate. And while the review of Paul's ministry may be historically accurate, Paul was a false prophet--so the testimony is untrue. Moreover, we don't have any highly reliable pre-Constantine MSS of Acts.

God cannot and did not die. Yahowsha' is the Ma'asyah (One who does the work of Yah). His body (and only His body apart from His Spirit) died as the Passover Lamb, but that only resolved our mortality--the consequence of sin. To resolve the penalty of sin, His soul had to go to She'owl on Unleavened Bread on the Sabbath.

According to Yahowah and Yahowsha': salvation is found in the Torah. Yahowsha' is the living embodiment of the Torah.

Yada

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:13 AM, "H ss" wrote:

To Yada,
I do not wish to threaten you like the others nor do
I want to kill you like the others said in your feedback. The only
thing I can do now is to have pity on you, for having an IQ that
works well to write big books but sadly lacks the knowledge to fill
its pages with authentic content. While you are basking in the
glory of your self-made fake success, I would like to know if you
have ever heard about true Islam? Because all that you have
mentioned in your book as well as your site appears to be a
completely different religion which gives the impression of being
created by a person as bad as Satan himself. If you feel this email
is contradictory to whatever you think, I can assure you that I am
capable to clear all your doubts regarding Islam. Moreover, I pray
to Allah that you understand what EXACTLY Islam teaches and
stop writing about an obnoxious man-made religion (which you
think is Islam) and naming it hence. Once you understand what
Islam teaches, you will convert into Islam. THIS IS A CHALLENGE
TO YOU. No doubt, this is possible only if Allah wills. But even if
you don’t admit it to a soul but you will at least, in the hearts of
hearts, know that this religion is the truest. Reply if you are brave
enough to accept this challenge!
A proud Muslim,

-H ss

You are such a hypocrite and liar, . You haven't even read Prophet of Doom.

So, here is a challenge: read it from cover to cover and then write me. Explain how a book based entirely on Islam's five oldest and most credible sources, can be anything other than a true reflection of Islam.

If you read it, you will no longer be a Muslim.

Yada

On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 3:16 AM, "786" wrote:

By writing on internet does not make you Prophet. You will burn in hell you f@#king basterd jew.

From: Prophet of Doom <email@prophetofdoom.net>
To: 786
Sent: Sun, Jan 2, 2011 7:11 pm
Subject: Re: so you think..

Wrong on all accounts:

Prophet of Doom was published and immediately sold out, which is why I give it away free online today.

I compiled Prophet of Doom from Islam's five oldest and most reliable sources, so don't blame me that they say Muhammad was a sexually perverted terrorist.

I never claim to be a prophet. Muhammad did and was not.

There are no fires in hell. It is a lightless place separated from God.

Uncorrupted by Islam, I refreain from using vulgarities as you have done.

I was born to married parents.

I am not a Jew.

Like your wannabe prophet, and your wannabe god, everything you say is false.

Yada

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 2:00 PM, 786 wrote:

You f@#king son of bitch who born you, you will only know when you f@#king burn in hell. You can what you like but don't forget you WILL have to die then real test will strat.

Only dirty Jew like you can write something like this for few dirty pennies. I am not wrong on all account.

Brilliantly written reply. Your god must be so very proud of you. You are a perfect example of what Islam does to a person's heart, mind, and soul. You have become a racist anti-Semite, just like the demonic spirit you believe is god--just like the perverted wannabe prophet you exemplify.

And as always, you remain wrong on all accounts. My mother was not a bitch. There are no fires in hell. My soul will never know separation from Yahowah. I will live forever. I will not be tested or judged. I am clean. I am not a Jew. I did not "write" the evidence contained in Prophet of Doom, but instead cited it from the oldest Islamic sources. And I give Prophet of Doom away for free.

It's a shame that you are unable to refute anything I have cited in Prophet of Doom intelligently, accurately, rationally, or morally. And it is a pity that you must lie to defend your pathetic religion and demonic god. The best you can do is threaten. But, that is all your god was able to do, so you have something in common with him.

Yada

On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 4:29 PM, "786" wrote:

The rise of Islam offers perhaps the most impressive example in world history of the power of words to alter human behavior in sudden, surprising ways.
William H. McNeill

Not my writing you f@#king PIG>

I noticed that these were not your words. McNeill's quote is moral, intelligent, and rational, and your words are not.

And of course, Muhammad's words altered human behavior negatively, not positively. They turned peaceful productive people into barbarians who became incapable of doing anything desirable.

Yada

Hey Yada,

we constantly hear Muslims claim that they do not want Sharia law... But this is just as foolish as if a Christian is not willing to follow the ten commandments, if you ask me. Or, have I wrong?

How high will put the Muslim Brotherhood on the list of dangerous symptom of the disease Islam?

Are not these so-called "freedom fighters" Hamas an outgrowth of the Muslim Brotherhood?

If Islam is the disease, where will you place the Muslim Brotherhood, Hezbollah, and al-Qaeda, etc. Which came first of all these other dangerous symptoms?

P

P,

Sharia Law is to Muslims as the Ten Commandments are to the Covenant. Sharia Law is based upon the words and deeds of Muhammad, the most repulsive man whoever lived. The Ma'aseyah Yahowsha' is the living embodiment of the Seven Commandments which were written with His own hand. Christians, however, ignore and reject most of the Towrah, including its Covenant, Commandments, and Called-Out Assembly Meetings.

The Muslim Brotherhood is the force behind all Islamic terrorist organizations--not just Hamas. They are fundamentalist Muslims, which makes them dangerous, deceitful, destructive, deadly, and damning.

So, if the disease is Islam, the worst telling and deadly symptom of the disease is the Muslim Brotherhood.

Yada

So your intention is to spread even more hate and fear huh?




Why did you chose to list only the ones that could be interpreted as hate and terrorism?
Merely to make money off ignorant Christians.



As I Christian, I am a follower of his teaching WHICH IS LOVE. How dispaointed God must be of so many of us around the world who use him to spread hate instead of peace to stand on some riteous platform. But that makes each of us no better than the other!




I have to ask why would you not also included passages form the Quaran the read:
"Surely those who believe, and those who are Jews, and the Christians, and the Sabians -- whoever believes in God and the Last Day and does good, they shall have their reward from their Lord. And there will be no fear for them, nor shall they grieve" (2:62, 5:69, and many other verse




"...and nearest among them in love to the believers will you find those who say, 'We are Christians,' because amongst these are men devoted to learning and men who have renounced the world, and they are not arrogant" (5:82).




"O you who believe! Be helpers of God -- as Jesus the son of Mary said to the
Disciples, 'Who will be my helpers in (the work of) God?' Said the disciples, 'We
are God's helpers!' Then a portion of the Children of Israel believed, and a
portion disbelieved. But We gave power to those who believed, against their
enemies, and they became the ones that prevailed" (61:14).

Hi,

I am listening to your audio version of Prophet of Doom. One thing I
noticed in chapter 1 is the Muslim emphasis on predestination.

Muhammad's emphasis on predestination reminds me of Calvinists I have
met. His portrayal of God's character is similar to that of Calvin,
although more extreme. According to Calvin, God predestines babies to
Hell, even before they were conceived.

I am quite certain that when the Antichrist shows up he will find
followers among both the Muslims and the Calvinists. The Calvinist
acceptance of amillennialism, and replacement theology, also mirrors
Islam's view of Israel.

While Calvinism passes itself off as Christian, it is no less dangerous
than Islam. But, Satan is the enemy and neither Calvinists nor Muslims.
They both need the gospel of Jesus Christ, His forgiveness and grace.

Trusting in Messiah Jesus alone,
D

D,

Yes, it is true. Muhammad was not the only religious fool. Predestination is absurd, as is replacement theology and antagonism toward Yahowah's land and people.

I have attached my current draft of An Introduction to God, because you have also been misled by your religion. While you are correct in many of your conclusions, there is no "Jesus Christ," only Yahowah and His diminished human manifestation, the Ma'aseyah Yahowsha', and both grace and gospel are pagan names and concepts. You have found some, but not all, of the myths and misconceptions of Christianity.

Know, trust, and rely upon Yahowah alone as He revealed Himself in His Towrah - Instructions. Engage in His Covenant according to the terms and conditions He presented in His Towrah - Guidance. Walk to Yahowah along the Path He has provided in His Towrah - Directions. It is what the Ma'aseyah Yahowsha' said and did.

Yada

Have been on your excellent website and found it very informative. Before I go any further I hasten to add I have nothing against Muslims or Islam. Each to his own, whatever religion....

I am a fiction writer and currently on my second book about a Black September attack set in 1973 on the All England Wimbledon tennis championships.
My plot involves a Black September cell flying helicopers over the centre-court crowd and pouring aviation fuel on them from monsoon buckets, followed by dropping sea rescue flares.
To make my plot as realistic as possible, what I wanted to know is, how do Muslim terrorists come to terms with Islam. How do they explain away their criminal actions in prayer? Do they ask for forgiveness?
Because of the vast amount of blood shed that has taken place in the middle east, with Muslim factions of every description from Syria, Libyia, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon and Egypt trying to kill each other.
If they have been involved in a terrorist attack. How do they ask for forgiveness in their prayers? Is there something in the Qur'an that automatically forgives them?

Would be grateful for your help.

Regard
B

B,

The best way I know to understand the Islamic mindset is to understand the mindset of Muhammad. And the best way to do that is to use the Hadith to reorder the Qur'an chronologically and set it into the context of Muhammad's life. That is what I have done for you in Prophet of Doom.

Islam is the antithesis of every thing and every value you know and hold. And that is because Allah was modeled after Satan. So it is upside down morality. Lying, killing, torturing, kidnapping, enslaving, rape, pedophilia, and adultery, are all good in Islam. So they don't ask forgiveness for doing these things.

Yada

Mr Yada,
Your views and thoughts about Islam in your website is misleading and illusion and ofcourse you are propogating falsehood about Islam.
Your are confused, deaf, dumb and blind about the understanding of Islam.
You are terrorising non-beleivers with your activities and please stop this childish act.

H

Congratulations H. You have successfully demonstrated that you are as foolish as your religion. Not only did you criticize a book you didn't bother to read, you don't realize that Prophet of Doom is based entirely on the five oldest and most reliable Islamic sources. Therefore, it is impossible for Prophet of Doom to be "false, confused, deaf, dumb or blind" without Islam being all of those things.

You are being childish, moreover you are wrongly promoting a terrorist religion. Please stop.

Yada