logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

8 Pages<12345>»
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Matthew  
#101 Posted : Monday, January 26, 2009 8:35:19 AM(UTC)
Matthew
Joined: 10/3/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,191
Man
Location: São Paulo, Brazil

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
WL wrote:
> "There are three (types of) people whom Allah will neither speak to on
> the Day of Resurrection, nor will He purify them (i.e., from their
> sins), nor will He (even) look at them (with Mercy); and they will
> have a painful chastisement.
>
> These are:
>
> 1. An old man who commits fornication;
> 2. a king who is a great liar, and,
> 3. a poor man who is proud."

What I find amazing is that "An old man who commits pedophilia" is not found on that list!
Offline kp  
#102 Posted : Monday, January 26, 2009 12:17:40 PM(UTC)
kp
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,030
Location: Palmyra, VA

Quote:
1. An old man who commits fornication;
2. a king who is a great liar, and,
3. a poor man who is proud."


Interesting. Considering Muhammad's life as a whole, these things describe him to a tee.

kp
Offline Yada  
#103 Posted : Saturday, January 31, 2009 4:12:23 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

The following is an exchange between "OK" amd Yada:

Quote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 1:03 PM, "OK" wrote:

You know that u are inventing stories about Islam. You know that Islam is the righteous religion but u were born and raised to hate it. One advice. Pray to your god that you die before you see the jewish religion being wiped out. Because we are working. We are teaching our children about the true Islam, the true Palestine, and the true secrets of success. We are teaching them to hate jews. So be ready to face an upcoming generation of victorious Islam.


Yada{s response:

Quote:
"O,"

Based upon the idiocy of Muhammad's words, the foolishness of Allah's recital, the violent behavior of Muslims worldwide, the hopelessness and repression of Islamic countries, and the content of letters we receive from Muslims, it has become apparent to us that Islam destroys a Muslim's ability to reason as well as their character.

While I am sorry that you have come to trust a sexual pervert and terrorist with your soul, and sorry that you are teaching your children to do the same thing, at least I have comfort in knowing that you have been exposed to the truth--leaving you without excuse.

If you had actually read Prophet of Doom, you would have known that it is the most accurate, best documented, most comprehensive, contextual, and chronological presentation of Muhammad's creation of Islam ever written. Nothing in it was invented. Every quotation was derived from Islam's five oldest and most respected sources. And as a result of doing this research, I have come to recognize that Islam is the most demonic religion ever conceived by man. So to say that I see it as "righteous" is delusional.

If you had read Prophet of Doom, you would have known that I am not Jewish, and that I hold a very negative view of the "Jewish religion." I know and serve Yahweh, and He is anti-religious. Yahweh, unlike Allah, knows the future and He has told us exactly what to expect in the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms. As a result (read Yada Yahweh), I know that God will personally destroy Islam the next time Muslims unite and attack Israel in what Scripture calls the Magog War.

There is no Palestine and there are there are no Palestinians. Both are marketing myths. The last Palestinian was killed by the Assyrians over 2500 years ago. Today, there are just Muslims so nasty and violent, so incapable of doing anything worthwhile, no one wants them--especially other Islamic nations.

Yes, I know that Muslims teach their children to hate Jews. The Qur'an is a more anti-Semetic book than Hitler's Mein Kampf. Muhammad (who by his own admission was demon possessed and spoke for the Devil) and Allah (who was modeled after Satan) hate Jews because Yahuwdym are Yahuweh's Chosen People. As such, Yahuwdym will continue to be victorious against the hateful Islamic onslaught.

Muhammad picked the wrong side.

Yada

Edited by moderator Monday, February 2, 2009 4:34:36 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#104 Posted : Saturday, January 31, 2009 4:24:29 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

The following is an exchange between "UL" and Yada:

Quote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 1:13 PM, wrote:

Mr. Yada-

I just wanted to know whether or not you truly believe in your heart that what you say is right? I mean, being a Muslim myself, I was bothered by what you have written. I live my life just fine and I have friends which are Christian, or Jewish (probably just like you). The only difference is that they are true believers, in that they don't 'hate'. I am sure the Bible, and your Christ did not teach such hatred. The Jesus that I know of was a great man that brought peace to the people, just as our prophet was. Maybe, you should stop yourself before you are rejected even from your own faith. Maybe God has covered your heart in a way in which you cannot come back to your senses. I hope you the best and I pray that God give you faith before it's too late.


Yada{s response:

Quote:
"U,"

What I believe is irrelevant--as is what you or anyone else believes. What I know is relevant. And what I know from Islam's five oldest and most reliable sources, has led me to conclude that beyond any reasonable doubt Muhammad was among the most evil men whoever lived. As a result of his cravings for sex, power, and money, Islam's lone prophet, and Allah's sole voice, created a delusional, demented, deceitful, deadly, destructive, and damning religion.

If you had read Prophet of Doom--Islam's Terrorist Dogma in Muhammad's Own Words, Umama, you would have known that the book is the most accurate, best documented, most comprehensive, contextual, and chronological presentation of Muhammad's creation of Islam ever written. Nothing in it was invented. Every quotation--all five thousand of them--was derived from Islam's five oldest and most respected sources. If they are reliable, Islam is rotten to the core. If they are unreliable, Islam ceases to exist--as nothing else is known about Allah or Muhammad.

For an informed, rational individual, it is that clear, that obvious, that simple. And that is the reason I wrote the book and established the website.

But the problem is that most all religious people, like you, live beyond the reach of evidence and reason. Using the religions' scriptures, I can and do prove that Islam, Judaism, and Christianity are false and unreliable. The evidence and logic I provide is irrefutable. For example, it is impossible that the Qur'an is the true word of God because it consistently and meaningfully contradicts the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms--books which it claims to confirm. On that basis alone, Islam is false.

However, this evidence and reason will be completely lost on you, because you aren't appropriately informed and you have lost the will to judge evidence logically. This is obvious from your letter, and it is ubiquitous among religious victims.

There is nothing more loving than exposing the false nature of a religion. Yes, I hate Islam, Muhammad, and Allah, but I love Muslims enough to risk my life to save them from their false prophet, false god, and false religion.

The Messiyah Yahushua was judgmental--especially when it came to religious deceit. He said that He did not come to bring peace, but instead division. He wants us to choose to trust Him, and not man's religious schemes.

Yahushua, like Yahuweh from Whom He is set-apart, hates all religions and wants us to expose and condemn them just as He has done in the Torah, Prophets and Psalms. God knows that religions like Islam lead to wars, to death, destruction, and to damnation. Loving us is why God hates them so much.

Muhammad was a ruthless terrorist. He was a sexual pervert. Muhammad was a mass murderer. He was the antithesis of Yahushua, just as Allah is the opposite of Yahuweh. Their scriptures, their natures, their purposes, their instructions, their behaviors, their heavens, and the path to them are all directly opposed. So, by suggesting that they are the same, you have revealed that you are either completely ignorant of them, or that you are incapable of thinking rationally, or both. In a phrase, you have been indoctrinated and victimized by your religion.

If you had read Yada Yahweh--A Conversation With God, you would know that I don't have a "faith," or a religion, because God is anti-religious. His criterion for accepting or rejecting souls is based upon our acceptance and reliance upon what He has done--not upon what we do or what we believe. This is one of the many examples where Islam and Yahuweh's Word are in direct opposition. There are countless others.

"UL", if you want to know the truth, if you can deal with the facts as they are known to us, if you are capable of thinking rationally, the truth regarding Muhammad, Allah, and Islam are provided for you in Prophet of Doom. The book, all 1000 pages of it, is free online. And then, once you know who God isn't, if you want to know who He is, you can read the 1500 pages of YadaYahweh.com. It is also free.

Speaking of free, if you lived in an Islamic country, the Jews and Christians you mention, would be treated like pigs. They would be robbed, raped, and murdered. And you wouldn't be free to examine the truth about Allah or Yahweh. Islam is intolerant of most everything--and most especially, the truth.

So, "UL", you can use the freedom given you by the non-Islamic nation in which you live, to examine the evidence and choose whom to trust. Use it wisely before it is too late.

Yada

Edited by moderator Sunday, February 1, 2009 2:17:39 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#105 Posted : Sunday, February 1, 2009 12:14:35 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:13 AM, M wrote:

conspiracy to subvert this world goes back much further than islam. islam is playing a most important part as it is, along with great oil wealth, the primary agent for which the anti-christ will make his appearance. sites such as the world forum and others list in great detail the plan to destroy america and the west and to bring it under a one world govt. the left since obama election now no longer even try to hide their ties. indeed, many a congressman now on the take from cair and have no problem speaking up for the religion. muslims have infiltrated evey single organ of the american govt and have been instrumental in the obama election with their funneling of huge amounts of money to various organizations helping to elect this man. the fbi , burned once too often, has just cut their ties to cair. seems they were getting tired of all their intelligence instantly finding its way to damascus and tehran. new attacks on rush now indicate path islam will take to conquer and silence christianity. first expose the frauds, second, use write in, call in campaigns, third use outright bribes or threats of blackmail, four use politicians to launch protected attacks in public, five get law enforcement to harass. you know the other methods. with millions rallying to obama i can't say for sure that islam will lose. between the cowardice of the average american and the buy off power of the oil cartel, it will take a leader of some magnitude to rally the troops against this false religion.


Yada's response'

Quote:
You are correct in saying that religious and political lies predate Islam, and that Islam is just the worst of a bad lot. The problem goes all the way back to Babylon, which is the basis of all religions and political schemes.

But where you are wrong is in assuming that the left is any better than the right, that BO is worse than GB, or that Democrats are worse than Republicans.

Troops are of no value against this foe. To prevail, we must shed our ignorance and learn to be judgmental.

Edited by moderator Monday, February 2, 2009 4:38:08 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#106 Posted : Monday, February 2, 2009 4:30:33 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 3:09 PM, "MF" wrote:
>
> hello.
>
> I just have a question. Are the people who run this web site
> Christians, in that they follow Jesus Christ? Thanks for your
> response!
>
> -M


Yada`s response:

Quote:
M,

In the context of exposing Muhammad, Allah, Islam, the Qur'an and Hadith as a religious fraud, names are especially important. As such, we know, and we want others to know, that the name "Christian" was based upon a Greek word which means "drugged and whitewashed." The religion itself was founded by General Constantine, who was a pagan sun-god worshiper. His Christianity, therefore, observes more Babylonian rites than it does those found in Scripture. Sunday worship, Christmas, Easter, Lent, and the Eucharist/Communion are good examples of this.

Most Christians are ignorant of Yahuweh's personal and proper name. They don't understand Yahushua's purpose or nature. They ignore the Called-Out Assemblies. And they remain oblivious to the narrow, restrictive, and unpopular path which leads to life. Moreover, as it relates to Prophet of Doom, most Christians don't recognize that Yahweh wants us to expose and condemn all lies which separate men and women from God.

Jesus is a manmade name. It was first used in 1629 in the third edition of the KJV. It has no Scriptural basis. The Greek rendering of Yahushua isn't written out on any page of any of the 70 first-, second-, or third-century manuscripts of the Renewed Covenant. It was added by Catholics. The closest sounding name to "Jesus" in English or Saxon was "Gesus," the name of the "Horned One" of the Druid religion. At best, Jesus is meaningless. Whereas, Yahushua means "Yah-Saves." It explains the Redeemer's nature and purpose.

Christ isn't "Jesus'" last name. The Greek basis for Christ isn't written out on any page of any pre-Constantine MSS of the Renewed Covenant and as such it has no Scriptural basis. The Hebrew title Messiyah can be transliterated or it can be translated "Implement of Yah," as in "the Messiyah Yahushua" or "Yahushua, the Implement of Yah." If you are going to follow someone, it's a good idea to know their name, understand their title, and to recognize from Whom they have come. Yahushua came in His Father's name to fulfill the Old Covenant, especially the Miqra'ey, not start a new religion.

So, the people who run the Prophet of Doom website are not "drugged and whitewashed" and they do not follow a manmade religious figure. They would consider themselves "Yahuwdym," which means "Related to Yah."

The perspective of the author of Prophet of Doom should be irrelevant to any rational reader because the book is based exclusively on the oldest and most reliable Islamic sources. As such, the book and the site provides a collection of some 5,000 quotations from the Qur'an, Sira, Ta'rikh, and Hadith which beg to be evaluated.

That said, the author of Prophet of Doom clearly states in the Letter to the Reader and in the Prologue of each of his books that what he has done has been at the request of Yahweh. And he states that he is unqualified, that is apart from the source of his inspiration. He is just a messenger, someone who should never be confused with the message.

However, if the perspectives, conclusions, and associations of the author of Prophet of Doom are of interest to you, read Yada Yahweh. It is free as www.YadaYahweh.com. Yada Yahweh is a 1700-page amplified translation of Yahuweh's prophetic Scripture based upon the oldest Old and Renewed Covenant manuscripts along with some commentary to help the reader more fully appreciate God's revelation.

This answer was long because ultimately, all correspondence to Prophet of Doom is posted, and we are more concerned about people being confused by the Christian religion than we are Islam. If Christians knew Yahweh and followed Yahushua, Islam would cease to exist.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#107 Posted : Friday, February 6, 2009 2:43:32 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

The following is an exchange between "N" and Yada. "N`S" comments are in RED.

Quote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:52 PM, "N" wrote:

THE UNNAMED AUTHOR OF PROPHET OF DOOM IS SUCH A COWARD


To which the "unnamed author of Prophet of Doom" wrote:

N,

The name of the author of Prophet of Doom is on the cover of the book and at the end of the letter to the reader. Thousands of emails have been addressed to him by name, the majority of which are posted on the site. And in those emails you will find that he has received hundreds of death threats from Muslims, demanding that he take down the site, strongly suggesting that he is the antithesis of a "coward." So, based upon your opening line, you may be among the least informed Muslims to have written us. Congratulations.


HE IS AFRAID OF ISLAM ALL QUOTES HAVE BEEN TAKEN OUT OF CONTEXT

Actually, the opposite is true. Prophet of Doom is the most contextual presentation of Islam's five oldest and most respected sources ever written. How is it possible for someone to be critical of something they know so little about? It saddens me to read in your words what Islam has done to your mind.


DO U SEE ANY MUSLIM WRITING OR TELLING THE CHRISTIANS UR BOOK IS WRONG UR OWN BIBLE IS FULL OF FLAWS`AND HOW MANY VERSIONS DO U HAVE OF THE BIBLE.

Once again, you are completely wrong, and on all accounts. To say that you are indoctrinated would be too kind.

First, Muslims have written articles and books, and have created websites, which attempt to show that the "bible is full of flaws" and that Christianity is wrong. The most famous of these is actually posted on our site, along with a reply, demonstrating that the Muslim failed miserably.

Second, since Allah claims that his koran "confirms the Torah, Prophets, and Gospels," if the bible were flawed, it would prove that Allah is not god. So, any Muslim who makes such an argument, destroys his or her own religion.

Further, the excuse rendered by Muslim apologists that the bible was altered so massively as to be so unrecognizable that it would become at least remotely similar to the koran, was destroyed with the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls and the seventy pre-Constantine first through third century manuscripts of the Renewed Covenant. The oldest of these predate the koran by one thousand years. The youngest of them predate the oldest extant koran by five hundred years. While there are differences, they are insignificant in comparison to the massive corruption which would have been required for Allah's book to be true. Moreover, most every meaningful difference further invalidates Allah's bogus claims.

Third, the fact that Allah consistently brags that his quran confirms that which is consistently contradicts is absolute proof that Allah was lying and that the foundation of Islam is false. Therefore, assailing the bible is counterproductive for Muslims. These books differ in every possible way, and they are the antithesis of one another on all important issues. Muhammad violated all ten commandments and Allah failed to so much as mention any of Yahweh's seven Called-Out Assemblies, for example.

Fourth, a translation isn't a "version," at least in the sense you mean it. Five translations of the koran were used in Prophet of Doom and yet I did not make the claim that there were five versions of the koran.

Fifth, I have dedicated the past several years to translating the oldest extant manuscripts of the Torah, Prophets, Psalms, and Renewed Covenant Writings in an amplified fashion. This book, called Yada Yahweh, is currently 1700 pages long and I have yet to find a single flaw. I invite you to meet Yahweh at www.YadaYahweh.com. It's free.

MY FRIEND THE QURAN IS THE TRUE BOOK WHICH HAS NOT CHANGED FOR 14OO YRS NOR WILL IT EVER CHANGE TILL THE DAY OF JUDGEMENT.

It would be impossible for a rational person to read the 1000 pages of 5000 contextual quotations from the oldest Islamic sources assembled chronologically in Prophet of Doom and conclude that the "Quran is the true book." It is false in every possible way, from bad plagiarism to moral tone and violence, from errant history and science to its lack of context, chronology, and reasonable transitions. The Qur'an may be the worst book ever written. It is more violent and anti-Semitic than Hitler's Mein Kampf--albeit not as well written.

In the Source Material Appendix of Prophet of Doom, called Islam's Dark Past, I prove that the Qur'an has changed. The claim Allah and Muslims make of it is false.


IF U WANT TO TRULY UNDERSTAND WHAT THE QURAN TEACHES I ADVICE YOU TO READ THE MEANING WITH FULL EXPLANATION.

Actually, there is no better way to understand the Qur'an than to place its surahs into chronological order and into the context of Muhammad's life using the Hadith/Oral Reports from Muhammad & his Companions, the Sira/Biography of Muhammad, and the Tarikh/History of Islam. This is precisely what Prophet of Doom does, confirming that it provides the fullest meaning and explanation that can be achieved. You would have been better served to have read it than criticize it out of complete ignorance.

MAY ALLAH GUIDE US ALL.
"N".


Based upon the Qur'an, Allah is the opposite of Yahweh. Based upon the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms, Yahweh is God. And that means that Allah is Satan. As such, he is no better guide than Muhammad, a man who was a pedophile, incestuous, rapist, polygamist, womanizer, sexual pervert, thief, assassin, mass murderer, liar, slave trader, war monger, and ruthless terrorist.

So long as you are free to choose your fate, as you are in most any non Islamic country, and so long as you have access to the truth, as you do with Prophet of Doom and Yada Yahweh, your choice as to whom to trust is completely up to you.

Thus far, you have chosen as poorly as you have written. Hopefully, that will not always be the case.

In Yahweh's name,

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#108 Posted : Friday, February 6, 2009 5:27:06 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:04 AM, "JO" wrote:

> Your Prophet of Doom audio has been very helpful to me.
> I have tried to give Islam the benefit of the doubt in the past. I
> have Muslim friends and they aren't "bad" people, but they are lost. I
> tried to investigate & understand Islam and see for myself if there
> was something beautiful or peaceful at its core. The answer, after
> several years of investigation is: NO! Anything that is "beautiful"
> about Islamic culture or practice is merely a cracked jewel ... flawed
> and valueless, only appearing sparkly from a distance. I know that
> your POD must seem harsh and overly critical to many, but it is merely
> the truth. Beheadings, totalitarian domination of anyone within reach
> and trickery for a moon god aren't my idea of truth. Thanks for being
> bold enough to set the record straight... maybe more people will throw
> off the mind shackles of deceptive "Political Correctness" and hear
> the real story. Peace
> -JO


Yada`s response:

Quote:
Thank you "J". The truth about Islam isn't politically correct. Not only is being politically correct wrong, so is Islam.

Good Muslims are terrorists because Muhammad was a terrorist. Islamic nations are totalitarian because Allah was opposed to freewill.

Criticizing a religion like Islam isn't hateful, it is the single most compassionate thing a person can do.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#109 Posted : Monday, February 16, 2009 9:21:46 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

More Islamic fan mail:

Quote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 1:12 PM, "I" wrote:

fuck you and fuck your israel idiot.

(A dolf Hitler said:I could have killed all of the jews in the world, but i left some to show the world how shitty they are..)

you must know idiot that islam is the biggest in the world

ok its the biggesttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt
ok
fuck you man


Yada's response:

Quote:
And look at what Islam has done to you! Allah is no doubt proud.

Yada

Edited by moderator Monday, March 9, 2009 4:07:47 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#110 Posted : Sunday, March 1, 2009 9:13:04 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 11:09 AM, "MB" wrote:

> Dear Mr. Winn
>
I am a Norwegian-American (as opposed to African American) and a Christian. As a Christian minister and in true journalistic fashion, I needed checked out an English translation of the Quran from the library to cross reference your quotations before I include them in my ministry. In my initial skim through the Quran I did indeed find plenty of wicked and violent verses, but they were all labeled “Sura” I looked up the chapter & verses you quoted under the general label “Quran” but they didn’t match up…Why? I would like to use them in my public ministry, but unless you reply, I’ll just jot down some of the better (if I can use that term for such decadent sayings) verses to use.

I did find some (barely) positive items that I could start in a conversation, such as the Quran acknowledging Jesus as a historical person and a messenger of God. Also they don’t believe in the Trinity at Sura 4(which was infused into the Christain church in the 3rd century in Constantinople, derived from ancient cultures such as Egypt and Babylon); and they don’t believe in eating blood (Acts chapter 15:20). After that it gets pretty slim. I doubt if I’ll covert any Muslims to the truth, but hey…I’m only the messenger. It’s God that makes the seeds of truth grow (1 Cor. 3:6)

I certainly admire your courage and putting your self in harm’s way…the way of the most violent and demonic religion this planet has ever seen!

-M


Yada's response:

Quote:
M,

The following link on the Prophet of Doom site provides a parallel presentation of the five most-respected Islamic Quran translations. http://www.prophetofdoom.net/Qurans.Islam You'll need to read several translations before citing a passage because they differ significantly.

I would recommend using the POD Quran which sets the surahs (Arabic for chapters) into the context of Muhammad's life as it was revealed in the Hadith. Here is that link: http://www.prophetofdoom.net/POD_Quran.Islam.

The easiest and quickest way for you to find and cite the verses you are looking for is to use the Islamic Quotations Appendix at the end of POD. It presents several thousand quotations by subject. The only problem with doing so is that without reading the book, you won't be prepared to defend what you cite. Here is that link: http://www.prophetofdoom.net/Islamic_Quotes.Islam.

The best way to understand the Quran is to read it in chronological order, as well as within the context of Muhammad's life, which is why I would encourage you to read Prophet of Doom from beginning to end before preaching on the subject of Islam. If you do so, you will be prepared to speak directly to an Islamic audience.

There are very few positive, accurate, and moral passages in the Qur'an, and what few there are were either plagiarized, negated by their context, undermined by Muhammad's perverted example, or abrogated by subsequent contradictory verses.

For example, the Koran can't be given credit for acknowledging the existence of "Jesus." Allah calls Yahushua "Issa" which is Arabic for Esau. Esau was hated by Yahweh because he married Ishmael's daughter and engaged in his religion. Moreover, the character, words, claims, and deeds of the Qur'anic "Issa" are the antithesis of the real Yahushua.

While I agree that the Trinity is Babylonian, not Biblical, the Koran's attack on the Trinity isn't enlightened, or even accurate. It's primary purpose was to deny Yahushua's deity. And Mo/Al were confused, thinking that Mary was the third person in the Trinity. The near deification of Mary in the RCC hadn't occurred by that time.

And while Muslims don't drink blood, they have spilled more than their share in acts inspired by, and demanded in, the Quran. Moreover, the Torah traditions repeated in the Qur'an came from Jewish rabbis in Yathrib.

Yahweh promised to protect my home and family if I were willing to engage in His mission to expose and condemn Islam. I've received a thousand death threats, but I neither hide nor duck. So it hasn't required any courage, just a willingness to engage and reliance.

While I agree that Islam is man's most demonic religion, it isn't the most violent or beguiling religion. Socialist Secular Humanism is by far the world's most deadly dogma, and Christianity is the most beguiling. While Islam is the antithesis of Yahweh's message, and thus purely Satanic, it is so foolish, it only fools fools. Christianity, however, has concealed Yahweh's message by placing its Babylonian-inspired counterfeits and corruptions directly on top of Yahweh's instructions. Half truths are far more effective than outright lies. For more insight on this, I invite you to read Yada Yahweh, free at www.YadaYahweh.com.

Yada

Edited by moderator Sunday, March 8, 2009 5:35:36 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#111 Posted : Wednesday, March 4, 2009 1:10:49 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:26 AM, "A" wrote:
> Holy Quran is the Unchanged words of ALMIGHTY GOD.
> Holy Prophet Mohammed is the blessing to the mankind.
> Liar priests  had   torn the  Books of HOLY ST Barnabas  because the
> Book contain the message of Islam. Go Read the Gospel to know the
> truth. Thanks


And Yada's response:

Quote:
Dear "A,"

Thanks for writing.

Sadly, your defense of Islam is invalid. The Qur'an was inspired by a dark and demented spirit--something which is obvious to anyone who is aware of the evidence and who is moral. By any rational standard, it is among the worst books ever written. You have been duped by your religion and played for a fool. Hopefully, one day that will change. It is why I wrote Prophet of Doom.

The oldest manuscripts of the Koran differ significantly from the current version. Moreover, it was maintained orally for a century, making the claim absurd. And since the current version is filled with contradictions and errors, the spirit who inspired it was a nincompoop. In the Source Material Appendix of Prophet of Doom, these points are proved conclusively. And that means, you have been duped by your religion and played for a fool. Hopefully, one day that will change. It is why I wrote Prophet of Doom.

Islam's lone wannabe prophet never issued a single prediction which came true, and he said many things which proved false, so he hardly deserves the title "prophet" unless it is "prophet of doom." As for being "holy," according to Islam's oldest and most respected sources, Muhammad was a rapist, a pedophile, incestuous, an adulterer, an assassin, a mass murderer, a thief, a liar, a slave trader, a warmonger, and a ruthless terrorist. That all sounds rather "unholy" to me. So, once again, you have been duped by your religion and played for a fool. Hopefully, one day that will change. It is why I wrote Prophet of Doom.

According to Yahuweh, the Author of the Torah, Prophets, Psalms, and the Renewed Covenant Writings, there are no "saints," and that would include Barnabas. According to Yahushua, the Savior, there are no "Gospels" either, only eyewitness accounts of the beneficial message, and that would make Allah's claim, and yours invalid. Further, there are no extant first through third century manuscripts of a "Gospel of Holy St. Barnabas" or anything close to it, so it wasn't part of the inspired Renewed Covenant Writings.

The Qur'an claims that Muhammad was mentioned in the Torah, Prophets, and Gospels, and yet there is no mention of him. And that of course would make Muhammad and Allah liars. There is, however, a great deal said about Islam, all of which is condemning. And since Yahuweh's message, purpose, nature, and plan is the antithesis of Allah's, Allah was lying when He said that his Koran confirmed the earlier message. So, sadly, you have been duped by your religion, and played for a fool. Hopefully, one day that will change. It is why I wrote Prophet of Doom.

I know Yahuweh. I know the truth. Hopefully, one day you will too.

Thanks,

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline In His Name  
#112 Posted : Wednesday, March 4, 2009 6:55:54 PM(UTC)
In His Name
Joined: 9/7/2008(UTC)
Posts: 550

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
I don't think I ever have before or ever will again hear Satan called a nincompoop! :^D Give 'em HECK Yada!!
“Because he clings to Me, is joined to Me, loves and delights in Me, desires Me, therefore I will deliver him, carry him safely away, cause him to escape from harm making him inaccessible and strong, and delivering him safely to heaven, because he has known, observed, cared for, recognized, instructed and advised others to use, designated, acknowledged, discerned, answered in, My name, authority, character, report, mark, and nature." Psalm 91:14
Offline Robskiwarrior  
#113 Posted : Thursday, March 5, 2009 1:00:43 AM(UTC)
Robskiwarrior
Joined: 7/4/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,470
Man
Location: England

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
In His Name wrote:
I don't think I ever have before or ever will again hear Satan called a nincompoop! :^D Give 'em HECK Yada!!


I was actually going to say "good use of the word nincompoop, keep it up!"

what kind of "attack" is 5 small lines of gibberish anyway? crazy...
Signature Updated! Woo that was old...
Offline Yada  
#114 Posted : Saturday, March 7, 2009 7:03:04 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:25 PM, "DP" wrote:

Could you tell me what translation of the Quran that you use? I bought one but it is much more tame than the quotes on your site and would like to be able to highlight ones that are similar to the ones in the version you used so I can show them to my friends.

Best Regards,

"D"


Yada's response:

Quote:
D,

You will find the answer in the Letter to the Reader.

http://prophetofdoom.net...uhammads_Own_Words.Islam

It reads:

So that there will be no confusion, I have set the passages from Islam's scripture in bold-faced type. When quoting from the Qur'an and Hadith, I have elected to use a blended translation. No language transfers perfectly - one word to another. Five of my twelve translations of the Qur'an were combined to create the most accurate conveyance of the message possible. However, the writing quality is so poor, the proofreaders of this manuscript suggested that I help Allah and Muhammad out by cleaning up their grammar, punctuation, and verbosity. So for clarity and readability, I have trimmed their unruly word patterns and meaningless repetitions, being careful not to alter the meaning or message of any passage. Insertions within parenthesis (like this) were added by the Arabic translators to fill in missing words or to clarify the text. Insertions within brackets [like this] represent my observations.... ...I recommend that you acquire at least three of the following Qur'an translations: Ahmed Ali, Pikthal, Noble by Muhsin Khan, Yusuf Ali, or Shakir. The oldest Qur'an fragments date to around 725 A.D. - a century after they were first recited.

All five of these Koran translations are available on the site at: http://prophetofdoom.net/Qurans.Islam.

Yada

Edited by moderator Sunday, March 8, 2009 5:34:37 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#115 Posted : Sunday, March 8, 2009 10:01:42 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:15 AM, "IS" wrote:

Was the writer of this"

About Us

A letter from Yada, the author of Prophet of Doom"
SOBER?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I tried to find some valuable thought, nevertheless it was mere insults, unistitutionalized claims and disgusting. Please respect the reader.

Dr.IS


Yada's response:

Quote:
I,

In the process of becoming a doctor, one would have expected you to understand the purpose of a Letter to the Reader, of a Prologue to a book, as well as of a Source Material Appendix. But since your education didn't include such insights, they exist:

to introduce the reader to the subject material,
to summarize the book's findings,
to explain the reason the book was written,
to present the nature of the evidence which will be examined,
to explain and qualify the evidence, demonstrating its appropriateness,
to discuss the methods which were deployed in the process of reviewing the material,
to present the layout or order of the book,
to present the author's perspective,
to provide the reader with a perspective from which to consider the material, and
to facilitate a reader's ability to study and evaluate the available evidence for themselves.

These are the only "valuable thoughts" which belong in a Letter to the Reader, a Prologue, or a Source Material Appendix. Their function is not to substantiate claims. That is the purpose of the chapters which comprise the core of the book.

And while all of this should be obvious to any literate person, as a direct result of the Qur'an, Muslims are required to reject most everything which is valid and appropriate. And like you, they all do so by insulting the messenger rather than finding fault with their message. I've been insulted by tens of thousands of Muslims, but not one has shown any of the evidence or the conclusions in Prophet of Doom to be errant. Hundreds have promised to do so, but they have all failed.

Some of the reasons Muslims are confused and left unable to think appropriately, is because the prologue of the Qur'an isn't in the same voice, it has no history of being revealed, and thus it doesn't belong with the rest of the material. The book itself is a jumbled mess. It isn't ordered chronologically or contextually. The first revelation is tucked toward the end of the book. The first real chapter was among the last revealed.

The Qur'an lacks intelligent transitions, it makes up words which don't exist, and it claims to be pure Arabic when many of the most important terms are Greek and Hebrew. It is very poorly plagiarized--in many places laughably so.

The Koran is grossly inaccurate historically and scientifically. Devoid of chronology, and lacking context, the only hope one has to understand Muhammad's rant is to use the Sira/Ishaq's Biography of Muhammad, the Tarikh/Tabari's History of Islam, and Bukhari's and Muslim's Hadith/or Oral Reports from the first Muslims, to set Allah's alleged revelation into the context of Muhammad's life as it is presented in the oldest sources. But when this is done, it becomes obvious that Muhammad created Islam only to satiate his cravings for sex, power, and money. The evidence is overwhelming and undeniable.

Worst of all, Allah's primary claim, that he inspired the Torah, Prophets, and Gospels, and that he was the god of Adam, Abraham, Moses, David, and Issa (Arabic for Esau, but assumed to be Yahshua) is a rational impossibility. Yahweh is the opposite of Allah. Yahweh's Word is the inverse of Allah's recital. The Covenant Relationship is in direct opposition to most all things Islam. Yahshua is the antithesis of Muhammad. It is therefor impossible to be an informed, rational Muslim.

Since the oldest and most reliable Islamic sources demonstrate that Muhammad was a pedophile, a rapist, incestuous, adulterous, a thief, slave trader, liar, assassin, mass murderer, warmonger, and ruthless terrorist, by suggesting that I "insulted" him by calling him such, means one of two things. Either you are ignorant of his past, or your moral standards are wholly inconsistent with Allah's lone messenger's and his behavior.

As for "unistitutionalized claims," let's assume that you meant "improperly established conclusions." But even then, your charge would be inconsistent with reality. When it comes to Muhammad, Allah, and Islam, there are no better sources than the five upon which Prophet of Doom was based. And, at a thousand pages in length, and bolstered by some 5,000 documented quotations from the oldest and most reliable Islamic sources, without filling the book with superfluous material and making it too long and distracting to read, it would be impossible to present more appropriately established conclusions.

But at least we agree on one thing. The best documented, most comprehensive, contextual, and chronological presentation of Islam's oldest and most reliable sources is "disgusting." And that is because Muhammad, Allah, the Qur'an, Hadith, and Islam are rotten to the core--completely and totally revolting. Ninety percent of the material contained in Islam's oldest sources is either immoral, unnecessarily violent, covetous, or childish.

The only reason I endured the hellish experience of wallowing in Muhammad's rubbish for so long was because I had more respect for Muslims than they have for themselves. I donated years of my time, and risked my life, to expose the truth about this false prophet and wannabe god so that thinking men and women might be freed of their scourge. But to capitalize, to benefit from this gift, you have to be able to handle the truth and be willing to search for it.

You don't respect yourself sufficiently to do either. And that is a sobering thought.

Yada

PS: In light of your attack on the Letter to the Reader, I thought it wise to present it again for your consideration.

Islam is a caustic blend of regurgitated paganism and twisted Bible stories. Muhammad, its lone prophet, conceived his religion solely to satiate his lust for power, sex, and money. He was a terrorist. And if you think these conclusions are shocking, wait until you see the evidence.

The critics of this work will claim that Prophet of Doom is offensive, racist, hatemongering, intolerant, and unnecessarily violent. I agree - but I didn't write those parts. They came directly from Islam's scriptures. If you don't like what Muhammad and Allah said, don't blame me. I'm just the messenger.

Others will say that I cherry-picked the worst of Islam to render an unfair verdict. They will charge that I took the Islamic scriptures out of context to smear Muhammad and Allah. But none of that is true. Over the course of these pages, I quote from almost every surah in the Qur'an - many are presented in their entirety. But more than that, I put each verse in the context of Muhammad's life, quoting vociferously from the Sunnah as recorded by Bukhari, Muslim, Ishaq, and Tabari - Islam's earliest and more trusted sources. I even arrange all of this material chronologically, from creation to terror.

Predicting what he called the "Day of Doom" was Muhammad's most often repeated prophecy. While it did not occur as he foretold in 1110 A.D., it nonetheless came true. Muslims and infidels alike have been doomed by Islam.

To discover why, we shall dive into the oldest surviving written evidence. These official works include: the Sira, Ta'rikh, Hadith, and Qur'an. Ishaq's Sira, or biography, called Sirat Rasul Allah, provides the lone account of Muhammad's life and the formation of Islam written within 200 years of the prophet's death. While the character, message, and deeds portrayed within its pages are the antithesis of Yahshua's and his disciples, the Sira's chronological presentation is similar in style to the Christian Gospels. The Ta'rikh is the oldest, most trusted and comprehensive history of Islam's formation and Muhammad's example, called Sunnah. It was written by Tabari. His History of al-Tabari is formatted like the Bible. It begins with Islamic creation and ends with the acts of Muhammad's companions. Tabari is a compilation of Hadith quotes and Qur'an passages. As such, it provides the best skeleton upon which to flesh out the character of Muhammad and the nature of fundamental Islam. A Hadith is an oral report from Muhammad or his companions. Muslims believe that Hadith were inspired by Allah, making them scripture. The most revered Collection was compiled in a topical arrangement by Bukhari. Allah's Book, the Qur'an, lacks context and chronology, so to understand it, readers are dependent upon the Sira, Ta'rikh, and Hadith.

All that can be known about Muhammad's deeds, means, motives, god, and scripture is enshrined in these books. In their pages you will see them as they saw themselves. My only point of departure from Ishaq and Tabari will be the comprehensive review of the early Meccan surahs, a period in which they had very little to say. Our paths will join again as we approach Islam's midlife crisis: the Quraysh Bargain, Satanic Verses, Night's Journey, and Pledge of Aqaba - a declaration of war against all mankind. At this point, the Sunnah speaks more clearly than the Qur'an.

So that there will be no confusion, I have set the passages from Islam's scripture in bold-faced type . When quoting from the Qur'an and Hadith, I have elected to use a blended translation. No language transfers perfectly - one word to another. Five of my twelve translations of the Qur'an were combined to create the most accurate conveyance of the message possible. However, the writing quality is so poor, the proofreaders of this manuscript suggested that I help Allah and Muhammad out by cleaning up their grammar, punctuation, and verbosity. So for clarity and readability, I have trimmed their unruly word patterns and meaningless repetitions, being careful not to alter the meaning or message of any passage. Insertions within parenthesis (like this) were added by the Arabic translators to fill in missing words or to clarify the text. Insertions within brackets [like this] represent my observations.

I have elected to present Islam's original source material in juxtaposition to my evaluation of its veracity. This format is similar to that used by the first English translators of Mein Kampf as they attempted to warn America about the dangers lurking in Hitler's manifesto. They, as I, found it necessary to hold the author accountable. A great deal was at stake then, as it is today. The last time the world was ignorant of such a hateful and violent doctrine, 55 million people died. If we don't shed our ignorance of Islam, many more will perish.

My quest to understand Islam began on the morning of September 11th 2001. I wanted to know why Muslim militants were killing us. So I went off to Ground Zero for Islamic terror - Israel. The West Bank is home to more suicide bombers per capita than anywhere else on earth. I arranged to meet with the terrorists themselves. I asked members of al-Qaeda, Islamic Jihad, al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigade, and Hamas why they were killing us. They said, "Islam. We are following Muhammad's orders." That adventure is recounted in Tea With Terrorists . It covers a wide range of material and serves as a companion volume, connecting fundamental Islam to terrorism. Prophet of Doom focuses strictly on what the Islamic scriptures have to say.

So, could it be? Could a prophet and a religion be responsible for today's terrorist attacks? I invested 10,000 hours in pursuit of that answer. I wish everyone had. But knowing that not all are able, I have distilled what I discovered into these pages.

Now for a word of caution: this journey of discovery is ordered chronologically. It is not prioritized by relevance. Explaining the root cause of Islamic terror is the biggest priority; yet it is not exposed until the last half of the book. I want you to know Muhammad, Allah, and Islam before you judge their legacy. So to keep you turning pages, I have endeavored to make Islam's early years as entertaining as possible. While Prophet of Doom is meticulously researched, documented, and accurate, it's written as if you and I were old friends having a lively chat about the most important and lethal issue of our day.

One last thought before you head down this perilous path. I pray that when you have reached the journey's end, you will share my heart for the plight of Muslims. I want nothing more than to free them from Islam, and in so doing, free us from the terror their doctrine inspires.


Yada
November 2003
ProphetOfDoom.net


The documented references in Prophet of Doom were derived from English translations of the following ancient Islamic manuscripts. I encourage you to purchase and read them. The Sirat Rasul Allah was written by Ibn Ishaq in 750 A.D. It was edited and abridged by Ibn Hisham in 830 and translated by Alfred Guillaume under the title, The Life of Muhammad in 1955 by Oxford Press. The History of al-Tabari was written by Abu Muhammad bin al-Tabari between 870 and 920 A.D. His monumental work was translated and published in 1987 through 1997 by the State University of New York Press. I quote from volumes I, II, VI, VII, VIII, and IX. Al-Bukhari's Hadith, titled: Sahih Al-Bukhari and The True Traditions was collected by Imam Bukhari in 850 A.D. I have used the collector's original nomenclature because the only printed English translation (Publisher-Maktaba Dar-us-Salam, Translator-Muhammad Khan) was abridged and erroneously numbered. Finally, I recommend that you acquire at least three of the following Qur'an translations: Ahmed Ali, Pikthal, Noble by Muhsin Khan, Yusuf Ali, or Shakir. The oldest Qur'an fragments date to around 725 A.D. - a century after they were first recited.


Thoughtless indeed....

Edited by moderator Monday, March 9, 2009 4:05:59 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#116 Posted : Thursday, March 12, 2009 12:03:39 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:08 AM, "BL" wrote:

Hi

Thanks for the interesting article as a Christian I already know of what spirit Islam is of.

The only problem is that your articles are atagonistic- although this shows more clearly what muslim r about from the responses derived it might be more importantl (as a Christian) to Love our Neighbour and speak the TRUTH in LOVE.
Fear not those who brandish sword or threat with sword but him (Jesus) who has power to destroy body and soul in Hell.

May God Bless You.


Yada's response:

Quote:
L,

Yahweh is antagonistic when it comes to religion, and He wants us to be as well. There are few things as loving as having the wisdom and courage to expose and condemn teachings which lead people away from God. We were given a nesamah/conscience so that we could be judgemental.

Since you are interested in the "TRUTH," I would encourage you to read YadaYahweh.com. It is dedicated to exposing the conflict between Yahweh's Word and Christian theology--including your conclusion as to how a Christian (which I am not) should deal with lies. (One of which is the manmade and errant name "Jesus.")

Yada

Edited by moderator Thursday, March 12, 2009 1:34:11 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#117 Posted : Thursday, March 12, 2009 12:10:28 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 5:19 AM, "AS" wrote:

Hi. My name's "AS", -- years old and a resident of the UK.

I have long had an interest in religions and having stumbled across islam was first fed a load of out-of-context "peaceful" and quite inspiring quotes from their holy book. however, a critical study of the religion has left me having no respect for it. But this is not the problem. the problem is how muslims behave because of their belief in the Quran and i would like to help in any way. i would also like your help.

There is a guy called Dr Zakir Naik who apparently has overcome all opposition's criticism of the religion with 'logical arguments'. He is praised greatly by the muslim community, worldwide. We need to tackle him by proposing arguments which he cannot refute.

Please look him up on Google/youtube.

Awaiting your response.

-A


Yada's response:

Quote:
A,

My response to Islam, and to the likes of Zakir Naik, is to expose what the oldest Islamic sources have to say about Muhammad and the first Muslims--which is overwhelmingly bad, both repulsively perverted and ruthlessly violent. Any informed rational person exposed to the evidence will reject and oppose the religion of Islam. So, if you want to help, my advice to you is to study Prophet of Doom and then to use what you learn to oppose Islamic deceptions.

In this regard, after you have studied POD, I would encourage you to read Yada Yahweh, so that you are fully armed to fight this battle. If you do these things, please write me again and I will put you to work.

The reason that deceivers like Naik are effective is that their audiences are ignorant and often irrational. To defeat him, his audience has to be educated.

Yada

Edited by moderator Thursday, March 12, 2009 1:35:43 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#118 Posted : Thursday, March 12, 2009 12:13:42 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:02 AM, "R" wrote:

Hello,

I have visited your Web site quite frequently (and have forwarded your Web site to many e-mail buddies) and find it quite informative. When I read the feedback you received from disgruntled islamist it shocked me and it became very apparent that these people are not peacful and loving, but vicious and cruel. I am a practicing Christian and I am not afraid to die for my faith in God and His most precious son Jesus. Taking an innocent life is a blatant horror and against God. However, in order to protect my family, innocent children, and my country I will fight to the death. I am sixth generation American, my father and his brothers fought in World War II, their father in WW1. My father's great uncle fought in the civil war. There is no way that anyone in my family is going to let these people take over our beliefs, life style, and most of all our faith in the one true God (Abba) and His son without a fight.

Today I received this e-mail from my brother and I could not believe what I was reading. How is this happening,
http://www.rethinkingsch...r/readings/what162.shtml

Is this the Anti-Christ, sure looks like it to me.

-R


Yada's response:

Quote:
R,

Thank you for reading and recommending Prophet of Doom.

Based upon the contents of your letter, my hope is that you read YadaYahweh.com. If you really want to fight Islam, you will benefit by what is revealed there. Since you want to protect your family, you will discover that Yahweh wants us to expose and condemn religions like Islam, but the be best way to do that is to understand what makes them deceitful and deadly, and then to use evidence and reason to confront them, not war, bullets, and bombs. With very few exceptions, none of which are in your list, wars make bad situations worse. The invasion of Iraq is a classic case.

The academic advisory you sent me was written by a socialist, secular humanist who is ignorant regarding what the Islamic scriptures teach and what Muhammad did and said. When it comes to education, such people are in the overwhelming majority. And being ignorant, and indeed immoral, and armed with a politically correct agenda, most every school in America, and especially Christian schools, teach students to look upon Islam favorably.

Our nation as a whole has become so indoctrinated, so ignorant, so irrational, so apathetic, that there is no hope of awakening, educating, and motivating a sufficient quantity of Americans to save the nation from the likes of those who crafted the pro-Islam teaching guide. I realize that is not what you, and indeed most Americans, want to hear, but it is important for you to know. In that light, I recommend that you invest the hundreds of hours that it will require to read Yada Yahweh, so that when you are done, you will be prepared to engage in a battle which can be won.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#119 Posted : Saturday, March 14, 2009 9:34:57 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:44 PM,"SH" wrote:

> what about what Israel is doing and the hundreds of childrens and
> babies they are killing are babies criminals who is the criminal here
>
> what about Christians like Hitler do you think that because of him all
> christians became terrorists
>
> plus all the Quran you brought was mentioned in certain situations and
> for certain reasons that you know nothing about
>
> you guys don't see except what you wanna see you keep speaking about
> Muslims who murdered one or two forgetting all about massacres that
> Christians and Jews are doing and finally let me remind you when you
> say that all Muslims are terrorists with what Shakespeare said ( that
> fools only generalize)


Yada's response:

Quote:
S,

Israel hasn't "killed hundreds of childrens and babies," but Muslims have killed millions of Christian, Hindu, Jewish, and Muslim babies and children. The evidence for this conclusion is pervasive throughout history, making you appear ignorant when you make such claims.

The reason some Muslim babies are killed in skirmishes with Israel today is because after firing rockets and mortars into civilian areas of Israel, Hamas terrorists hide behind the berkahs of their women and in the midst of their children. If these things did not occur, the only murderers of Muslim babies would be Islamic suicide bombers.

Hitler was an occultist, and thus, like Muslims, worshiped Satan. This is very well documented so I'm surprised that you would make such an ignorant claim. Moreover, "Christian terrorists" represent a tiny fraction of 1% of all terrorist related attacks and deaths today while Muslims perpetrate over 95% of all terrorist acts.

When it comes to understanding the terrorist acts condoned by and encouraged in the Qur'an, there is no better source than Prophet of Doom. So, once again you are misinformed, something which is pervasive among Muslims. According to the oldest and most credible Islamic sources, Muhammad was a terrorist solely to satiate his cravings for sex, power, and money. The simple truth is that Islam's lone prophet and Allah's sole messenger, was a rapist, pedophile, slave trader, mass murderer, and terrorist. It's a shame you trust such a repulsive and ruthless individual.

Sadly, it is the victims of religions like Islam who only see what they want to see. The facts destroy their religion's credibility so they not only ignore them and deny them, to make themselves feel better, they attack other religions, as if Christianity being bad makes Islam better. It's an irrational way of thinking.

While I'm anti-Christian, just as I am anti-Secular Humanist and anti-Islamic, over the course of human history, Catholics rank third in terms of death and destruction. Socialist Secular Humanists are the most lethal and destructive, with Muslims second. Jews don't even rank in the top 100. But, then again, your hatred of them is a direct result of the Qur'an's antisemitism. It is yet another way that Muslims are like Nazis.

Should you want to know the truth, should you want to know God, after reading Prophet of Doom, read Yada Yahweh. If not, continue to defend Islam.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#120 Posted : Saturday, March 14, 2009 9:46:46 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:53 AM, "MB" wrote:

Dear Mr. Wynn,

I thank you for your respectful opening salutation of “pastor” in your March 1 E-Mail, and although I do consider myself an ordained minister since my baptism, I prefer not to be addressed by any of the elevating titles that Christendom uses to extol their clergy … Mr. "N" will do just fine.

I must say Mr. Wynn you certainly have done your homework and have accordingly accepted truths that others prefer to hide… challenging the “powers that be” – the Catholic and protestant churches and rightly denouncing their pagan Babylonian doctrines. Reverend Hislop certainly covered most of “the bases” on doctrinal origins of the churches of Christendom (The Two Babylons). The word that best describes these professed Christians is “Apostate”. Of course, this was all foretold by the apostles anyway, so it should be no surprise to any honest Bible student that such false Christianity is so rampant nearly 2000 years after the death of the apostles (1 Timothy 4:1; Acts 20:30; 2 Peter 2:1, 3; Matthew 7:21-23); and while the tone of my ministry is a positive one, I do denounce false religion when the occasion arises. Of course, by proclaiming the truth and providing scriptural support, people can often come to these conclusions by themselves.

You have given me great topics for research and I am taking them one at a time –which of course, takes a great deal of time in what sometimes can be exhaustive research to arrive at the truth. I can’t even imagine how many hours you have spent on all your theocratic treatises, but I thank you for your work. My object with the Muslim faith is to get them into the Bible as quickly as possible, not to dwell extensively on their beliefs; so hopefully a few of your “exposés” in the course of conversation will do.

So, in my first point of research from your E-mail reguarding the Bible and particularly the name “Jesus”, I tried to “Google” the name “Gesus” and “Druids”, but nothing came up so regarding the name “Jesus”, so I’ll leave that research project for another time; But I’d like to zero in firstly on your accurate and admirable truth that “the search for truth and salvation begins with God's name.”. I commend you for seeing how imperative it is to laud God’s holy name (The first order of importance in the ‘Lord’s prayer’ Matthew 6:9) since I have found that most of the churches seem to hate God’s name however it is pronounced! ; And I see that you prefer to use the probable Hebrew pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton – Yahweh.

First of all, a discussion of God’s name certainly necessitates an acknowledgement of the etymology of language and in our case the evolution of the English language via its Anglo-Saxon beginnings, in order to reach serious conclusions concerning the use and pronunciation of God’s name. So here’s what I’ve found: Here’s an excerpt from the reference work Wikipedia:

The Age of the Masoretes

“The current received text finally achieved predominance through the reputation of the Masoretes, schools of scribes and Torah scholars working between the 7th and 11th centuries, based primarily in Palestine in the cities of Tiberius and Jerusalem, and in Babylonia. These schools developed such prestige for the accuracy and error-control of their copying techniques that their texts established an authority beyond all others

According to -The Hebrew term יהוה had been vocalized as יְהֹוָה(YeHoWah/JeHoVaH) in the Masoretic Text that was formed during the 7th-11th centuries”.

Thus God’s name in the form Yohoua appeared in 1278 in the work by a Spanish monk named Raymundus Martini in his work, Pugio fidei  (from the Ste. Geneviève library, Paris, France [folio 162b]) Numerous other instances could be cited.

So just as with human names, “Jehovah” has been “naturalized” into most languages, making him uniquely distinct from any other gods or supernatural creatures. However to be overly concerned with the exact pronunciation ( and scholars are not 100% sure of the Hebrew pronunciation either) subscribes to the attitude revealed in the forward of the King James Bible, the Good News Bible, Jewish translations of the Hebrew scriptures, and others, namely, that an ancient Jewish superstition over the possible misuse of God’s name, precludes the use – or translating of it – in the Holy Scriptures. Because of this, they have omitted it entirely from their translations (It appears only 4 times in the King James version). Using the name - especially in personal prayer - is what is important to the Almighty god (Matthew 6:9).

A second point is the importance of the meaning of God’s name (as you know, Biblical personalities were defined by the meaning of their names (I.E Abraham: “Father of a Multitude”). In your “A Conversation With God...” Youstate:

“Yada’ means: “to know in a relational sense.” Yahweh is God’s personal name. It conveys ‘I Am’ and ‘I Exist.’ ”

Interestingly, when Moses was to return to Egypt, here’s what he said:

13 And Moses said unto God, Behold, when I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they shall say to me, What is his name? what shall I say unto them?  14And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you. [Exodus 3:13,14 King James Version]

Trinitarians like to use this scripture with John 8:58, and 59 in an attempt to prove that Jesus is  God even though in the entire context of this 8th chapter, Jesus –or Yahushua – is trying to relate where he came from and where he was going…ultimately telling them that he existed before Abraham.  God’s reply in Hebrew to Moses, however, was: “Eh-yeh΄ asher΄eh-yeh”; and while the King James Bible and others render this as “I AM THAT I AM”, if you look a little further into the meaning of the Hebrew verb (ha-yah΄) from which the word ΄eh-yeh΄is drawn, you will find that it does not mean simply to exist or to be. It means to come into existence, to happen, occur, become, take on (an attribute), enter upon (a state), or constitute. The name comes from the Hebrew verb ha·wah´, “become,” rendering Exodus 3:13,14 more accurately as “He Causes to Become” or “will prove to be.” Because of this, the footnote of the Revised Standard Version Bible gives as one reading “I WILL BE WHAT I WILL BE” (similar to Isaac Lesser’s translation “I will be that I will be”). This reveals God as the One who,with progressive action, causes himself to become the Fulfiller of promises.Thus he always brings his purposes to realization. So, the reference here isnot just to God’s self-existence but to what he has in mind to become toward others. Only the true God could rightly and authentically bear such a name.Don’t you agree? Let me know what you think.

-MB


Yada's response:

Quote:
M,

I am pleased that you have decided to do your homework, but I'm not impressed that you have turned to Google and Wikipedia for answers. And while it is helpful to know that Hislop was accurate in his condemnation of Catholicism, you should also know that he was blinded to most of Christianity's concealments, corruptions, and counterfeits of Yahuweh's Word. My recommendation to you is for you to invest the time required to read the 2000 pages of Yada Yahweh with a score of lexicons, dictionaries, interlinears, and old texts by your side to validate the translations of Scripture. By doing so, most all of your questions will be answered and you will become much more effective in your ministry, especially to Muslims.

Yada

Edited by moderator Saturday, March 14, 2009 1:32:25 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#121 Posted : Monday, March 16, 2009 4:06:30 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 5:04 PM, "AB" wrote:

Thank you, Thank you, most people would not have the time to research and write the material you have. It confirms a great deal of my own beliefs about islam, you could go as far as saying in some ways Muhammad is the AntiChrist but it would be giving too much credit to a person who deserves no respect.


Yada's response:

Quote:
A,

Muhammad was among the most repulsive people whoever lived. He created Islam solely to satiate his cravings for sex, power, and money. And while he was demon possessed by his own admission, he was a powerless nincompoop compared to the antichrist. That bad boy is alive today, but he hails from a country like Macedonia, not Arabia. He will, however, use Muhammad's religion. Based upon an examination of the oldest Renewed Covenant manuscripts, I'm convinced the 666 rendering/translation is really "in the name of Allah."

Yada

If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#122 Posted : Monday, March 16, 2009 4:27:08 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 10:48 PM, {TL" wrote:

Aloha…

This article at Atlas Shrugs needs commenting from someone as knowledgeable as you regarding the Bible vs the Qu’ran. Please comment on it!

Moral Relativism on the Bible and Qur'an

http://atlasshrugs2000.t...he-bible-and-quran-.html


Yada's response:

Quote:
T,

The most common defense Muslims use to defend Islam is to demean Christianity and the Bible. Ignorant of both, Secular Humanists defend Islam the same way. And while Christianity, especially Catholicism, behaved badly for a very long period of time, there is absolutely no Scriptural encouragement to do so. All of the Bible's calls for violence are constrained to a handful of settlements in Israel circa 1400 BCE. There are no open ended directives to wage war beyond this specific place and time.

The Qur'an's calls for fighting are unlimited in geography and they exist into perpetuity. Moreover, the greatest rewards in paradise are given to those Muslims who kill Christians, Jews, and peaceful Muslims.

Also, there are over 250 peaceful and nurturing verses for every violent one in the Bible, while immoral and violent verses outnumber nurturing ones by 200 to one in the Qur'an. That makes the Qur'an 5,000 times worse, and thus hardly comparable.

For a complete understanding, I encourage you to read Prophet of Doom and Yada Yahweh. Once you have done so, you will understand why all good Muslims are terrorists and why God hates religion.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#123 Posted : Friday, March 27, 2009 7:13:06 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 3:06 AM, "SB" wrote:

> Dear Pastor,

> I visit ur site regularly and I get so much of info, recently I was
> watching an islam  channel called PEACE TV . In that one particular
> programme the man named ZAKIR NAIK said tat "EARTH IS NOT IN CIRCLE
> SHAPE ,IT IS IN SPHERICAL SHAPE LIKE THE EGG OF AN  OSTRICH DEFENDING
> TO THE BIBLE VERS isa.40:22". So wat is your opinion on this how can
> we answer this,clear my doubt please.
>
> THANK
> U
> -SB


Yada's response:

Quote:
Naik is a professional deceiver apologizing for a deceitful religion. You should ignore him.

In response to his claim: First, a sphere is comprised of an infinite number of circles--which means he was wrong. Second, an egg is not a sphere. Third, the slight bulge of the earth at the equator due to the rotational force is so insignificant compared to the planet's overall size, it doesn't merit a egg comparison--especially in contrast to a sphere (a three dimensional circle). Fourth, the Isaiah passage was written as poetry and thus was metaphoric. Fifth, the Hebrew word chuwg in this context says that God sits above that which encompasses the the erets, which is land. Sixth, the circle or round aspect of chuwg in the context of erets, was revolutionary for its time--circa 750 BCE. At that time no one thought the earth was round.

Rather than listening to this fool, I invite you to read YadaYahweh.com.


Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#124 Posted : Friday, April 10, 2009 4:28:02 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
Yada

On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 4:32 AM, `EB` wrote:

> Greetings Brothers in Christ,
>
> I know you have done an awesome job but you only have the Sunni
> understanding of Islam. Please update your quotations section and allow
> people to see the Shia understanding. That will allow people to expect the
> unexpected. Please understand that Islam is very diverse so there is a
> diversity of evils that people need to see, not just sunni. Thank you.

-EB


Yada`s response:

Quote:
E,

Prophet of Doom is based solely upon Islam's five oldest texts, all of
which are actually more Shia than Sunni. (Read the Source Material
Appendix for more on this.) My goal wasn't to expose and condemn
today's Muslims, but instead to reveal that the basis of the Islamic
religion was pure rubbish and that Muhammad was repulsive.

In the support materials on the site, I have attempted to be even
handed, revealing the subtle differences between Shia and Sunni Islam
today. As it relates to us, the only real difference lies in the Shia
prophecies of a Mahdi--a man who will turn out to be the Scriptural
Gog--leader of the Islamic Magog Federation. In this regard, what the
US did in Iraq was suicidal.

I spend most of my time today writing Yada Yahweh and we are therefore
looking for people who are willing to contribute to the POD site. If
you would like to write articles on Shia Islam, we'll post them.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#125 Posted : Thursday, April 30, 2009 10:45:54 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:30 PM, "YS" wrote:

Sir,

I usually don't like to dignify the ignorance of hate-mongerers because it is never of any avail to a person who is basically a narcissist, but your website is exceptional in it's sinister content and which spews fiction presented as so-called 'facts'--ones that are egregiously and grotesquely false, misconstrued and show an obvious lack of any understanding, let alone attempt to have anything but intolerance to a subject matter of which you have absolutely no knowledge. You've spent a great deal of time and effort putting together a concoction of disjointed, false and unrelated information. It's a shame that you couldn't have spent your time in a productive and meaningful endeavor that actually enlightens and educates...it's interesting how similar you've chosen to focus your energy in a way that parallels that of Osama-bin-Laden and the likes of him--destructive and negative. You are an extremist that is bound by your own pitiful mental and emotional limitations--deluded ones at that. Please stop the masquerade of a learned or decent person. It is an insult to mankind.

People with your determination are scary and pitiful. Rather than being a part of the solution, you choose to be part of the problem--a demon of darkness.

Regretfully,



"YS"


Yada's response:


Quote:
Re: Comment‏
From: Prophet of Doom (email@prophetofdoom.net)
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 4:30:16 AM
To: "YS"

YS,

Rather than judge a work out of ignorance, and make yourself look like a hypocritical fool, read all 1000 pages of Prophet of Doom--Islam's Terrorist Dogma in Muhammad's Own Words and then share your comments and concerns intelligently. As the best documented, most comprehensive, most contextual, and chronological presentation of Islam's five oldest scriptural sources, the book is the opposite of what you claim.

There is nothing in it which "is sinister," "egregiously and grotesquely false, misconstrued, or lacks understanding," at least apart from Muhammad's rubbish. It is the least "disjointed" review of Muhammad's words and deeds ever compiled.

Thousands of Muslims have tried to find fault with Prophet of Doom, and yet none have prevailed. You are invited to try as well, but you won't be the first.

The book exists to prove, using only the most reliable Islamic sources, that Islam, Allah, Muhammad, the Qur'an and Hadith are false and cannot be trusted. Yahweh asked me to do so to leave Muslims without excuse.It was the most compassionate, least hateful, thing someone could do.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#126 Posted : Thursday, April 30, 2009 4:00:13 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:

Re: Website Question‏
From: Prophet of Doom (email@prophetofdoom.net)
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 7:42:44 AM
To: "S"

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 1:31 PM, "S" wrote:

Yada,

Thank you for replying. I am on page 236 of Prophet of Doom, page 130 of
Spencer's Stealth Jihad and cracked the opening of Vernon Richards'
Islam Undressed.

You're in the midst of the Satanic Verses and about to ride through Muhammad's delusions of grandeur. From there, it is nonstop violence. Based upon your emial address, you'll find the chapters from Pedophile Pirate to the end of the book, particularly valuable.

Your book, Prophet of Doom should be a required reading item for every
American. I am several thousand hours behind you in the research and
understanding of Islam. Prior to reading your book I read the Quran and
the Sirat. Just those two alone led me to ask the question, how can any
educated American become a Muslim. My simple answer is they clearly must
not have read any of the source documents. I cannot think of any other
valid reason.

Thank you. You started with the right selections. It surprises me that so few people are smart enough to do what you have done.

There are no informed, rational Muslims. It is why truth is the most lethal weapon we can wield at Islam. We are making more of them with bullets and bombs.


I am deeply concerned though, that someone as articulate as you was
unable to convince the Bush Administration with the wealth of knowledge
you provided to make better informed decisions.

GWB is an evil man. He's not very bright either. Truth and reason were irrelevent to him.

I know you are not a proponent of the "War on Terror" moniker. However,
I wonder if that was selected to avoid or try to avoid the "War on
Islam" title. Regardless, the problem is much deeper rooted than Iraq
and Afghanistan.

You can't fight a tactic and prevail. Yes, our leaders have no interest in telling us the truth--about Islam or most anything else. But the reasons they lie would take a book to articulate.

Neither Iraq nor Afghanistan were the problem. Islam is the problem. If you want to identify a state with the problem, then start with Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Iran. (Oops, the US has facilitated the ambitions of the real problem states by its invasion of irrelevent A and secular I. We moved the Taliban, which is part of the Pakistani ISI out of A and into P, where they are a year away from having nuclear weapons. And we eliminated Iran's only enemy and gave them Iraq. Some would call that stupid. Others might call it suicide.)


As I have been rooting around your website I read a snippet about your
answers in Tea with Terrorists, which I am currently working on
obtaining a copy.

It might still be available through Amazon. And it's free online. It has material in it which might be very helpful to you.

Since I guess you are in circles with folks like Spencer et al, do you
know if people equipped with knowledge such as you are assisting Geert
Wilder's Defense Attorneys. I just think it would be an achievement to
have the Dutch Courts have words from the Quran documented as "hate
speech." So, if I were a lawyer with in-depth knowledge of Islam, it
would be my strategic objective to manipulate the court such that it
would not even recognize what it did until it was too late! I fail to
understand why the world is ignoring something so blatantly obvious and
the longer it waits the worse the problem gets (subjugation, coercion,
death, etc).

I don't have a relationship with Spencer but I'm reasonably close to some of the other founders of anti-Islamic sites - especially Ali Sina.

I've exchanged emails with GW's associates and offered copies of POD, and I've offered to help, but it's a Dutch legal issue, not a truth or scriptural issue that he is enduring. That said, it would be a great thing for his legal team to read POD and use Islam to defend Geert.


Anyway, part of my responsibility is related to terrorism. I spend a lot
time at home reading material to support my work (not necessarily
required, but according to Sun Tzu, know thy enemy).

It is interesting that Sun Tzu is credited with the amoral "the enemy of my enemy is my friend," and yet I can't find a line remotely similar to it in the Art of War. Where did it come from. Some say Salidin. This statement attributed to ST is what gets America in so much touble.

Thank you for your time (also, I will be very interested in your Yahweh
work as well, United States needs more people like you)

It's too late for the US, but it's not too late for individual hope. Yada Yahweh is a billion trillion times better than POD. I really hope that you read it.

Based upon your email address, I suppose you work in intel for the miliary.

Yada

If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#127 Posted : Friday, May 1, 2009 2:59:54 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:

Re: i think you are an idiot‏
From: Prophet of Doom (email@prophetofdoom.net)
Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 7:51:41 AM
To: "MD"

Dear Muslim "MD,"

It is sad to see what an Islamic upbringing has done to your mind and heart. Your thinking is as degraded as your language.


i cant believe you take any random act of violence and blame it on a relegion.

Islam's 1400 year history of committing violent acts against civilians is the opposite of "random." The jihadists themselves, "blame" their terrorist deeds on Allah, screaming "Allahu Akbar!" (Allah is the Greatest) as they perpetrate their crimes. And Prophet of Doom blames Islam on Muhammad, not on his 75 ruthless terrorist raids, or on any of the senseless acts of violence Muslims have committed since that time in the name of his religion.

david koresh was christian, wasnt he a terrorist....?,,

David Koresh was a Branch Dividian, not a Christian, and he wasn't a terrorist--not even close. You obviously don't understand the meaning of the word "terrorist." Koresh, like Muhammad, had a Messiah complex. He called himself "the final prophet," just as Muhammad had done. They were both egotistical deceivers who perpetrated their religious claims to satiate their perverted sexuality, for power, and for money. The only meaningful difference between Muhammad and Koresh, was that Koresh's religious scheme only killed 75 people and Muhammad's deadly dogma has killed tens of millions.

but you choose not to use that example.

Prophet of Doom is Islam's Terrorist Dogma in Muhammad's Own Words. It's not about the Branch Dividians, idiot.

the worl is a fuked up place, and its even more fuked up with propaganda like your website.


The world is a mess, primarily because of religions. Islam is just the worst of a bad lot.

It's interesting the Muslims (and those who coddle them) accuse Prophet of Doom of being "propaganda," but not one Muslim, or Islamic apologist, has found anything in the book to be inaccurate. In fact, Prophet of Doom is the best documented, most comprehensive, most contextual and chronological presentation of Islam's five oldest and most respected sources, so to call it "propaganda," is to say "the Islamic scriptures are propaganda."

People make their own choices, a relegion is just a book.

Islam means "surrender." It is the opposite of people making their own choices. And that means that Islam is the opposite of Yahweh's Word, whereby freewill is central and foremost.

We agree that "religion is just a book." And that is why my condemnation of Islam is based exclusively on Muhammad's recitals, words and deeds as they are recorded in the Koran, Hadith, Sira, and Tarikh. I use his words, and those he attributed to Allah, to prove that they were liars who cannot be trusted.


I would liketo know your take on judiasm, or christianity...

If that were true, you would have followed the link to Yada Yahweh, and read my expose on Judaism and Christianity.

chances are your some freak wierd ass born again christian who sole purpose in life is to badger people, used to do drugs and cheat lie and steal, and now all of a sudden jesus saved you....

You are wrong on all accounts. But that is normal for Muslims and those they have befuddled. I am not a Christian. My sole purpose in life is to reveal what Yahweh had to say, and to expose and condemn lies which prevent people from knowing God. I don't badger anyone, because I am a proponent of freewill.

While who the messenger is is irrelevant, I don't use drugs, cheat, lie, or steal. And the Savior's name is Yahushua, not "Jesus." Allah, being a nincompoop, or just being evil, calls the Messiyah "Issa," which is Arabic for Esau--the one person Yahweh says He hates for accepting Ishmael's religion--Islam.

But what's interesting here, is that, unable to refute what I've exposed in the Islamic scriptures, you attack me. That's mentally lame.


or your a jew, who is so brainwashed by his own government and comic book he calls a tora.,

Wrong again on all accounts. It is the one thing Muslims and their cohorts are consistently good at, however.

I am not a Jew. I am very critical of my government. And if the "Torah is a comic book," then Allah is a comedian, because your demonic god claims to have inspired it.


that you dedicate your days to a website taht is the most unfactual biased and hypocrtical site ive ever seen...

Wrong again. I haven't contributed to the POD website for several years--so I'm hardly "dedicating my days" to it. I've said all that needs to be said against the religion. Based upon the evidence, I have made it impossible for an informed, rational person to be a Muslim--and that was the sole intent.

While there is nothing "unfactual" on the site, much less in the book, I am biased. As a moral, rational person, I hate deceptive, destructive, and deadly dogmas like Islam. And as a moral person, I despise Muhammad's for his acts of pedophilia, rape, incest, adultery, assassinations, mass murders, thievery, slave trading, and terrorism.

The Qur'an defines "hypocrite" as a peaceful Muslim. Allah says that he will personally torture such hypocrites in the hottest place in hell. Since I'm not a Muslim, peaceful, jihadist, or otherwise, I don't fit the Islamic god's depiction of a hypocrite.

However, falsely accusing an author with the opposite of what is true, and being the opposite of what you claim to be (moral and informed) is hypocritical.


good luk with your brainwashing...im not even religious, think all religions were made by man, including christainity and judiasm.

Save the "brainwashing" comment, you finally got something right. "All religions were made by man, including Christianity, Judaism," Islam, and Socialist, Secular Humanism.

But i was raised a muslim...

It's obvious. And it remains a terrible problem for you.

I know that you are in your little box so you wouldnt be able to see or comprehend any of this....but you need to take a step back and take a look from SOMEONE ELSES perspective.yours is too narrow!

My little box is the world. Unlike you, I've traveled in over 150 countries. My comprehension is my only real asset. Unlike most, I can assimilate information and make the appropriate connections between things, which in turn leads to comprehension. This evidence and reason approach is the basis of Prophet of Doom and Yada Yahweh.

My perspective is Yahweh's. Since He is God, I have concluded that it's the best of all possible options.

And if you are advocating your perspective as one I should consider, as one which is broader, even though you ou were very articulate and persuasive,

I think I'll pass. But thanks for the offer.

Yada


The conversation continues:

Quote:
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 4:14 PM, "MD" wrote:

its funny how you claim fact to scriptures , THE WAY YOU INTERPRET THEM. Like I said, all relegions are a joke ,and you believing in yahweh is also a joke. There is a GOD, but if the god that is depicted in all these books is as narrowminded as his followers, WE ARE ALL DOOMED! You are an idiot, you have traveled to 150 countires and havent been able to open or BROADEN your horizions or your thinking. You have studied relegions from all parts of the world, yet you are a firm believer that you have chosen the right one. Im sure you have traveled the world and seen more on this earth than I have yet to see.But its a shame that you were unable to gain any kind of understanding on life in doing so. yaweh , jahova, god jesus, mohhamed, it doesnt matter. The main characters in a everlasting saga, of who has chosen the right path. You are just as bad as a terrorist who uses his relegion as a mask for his real agenda, hate. Terrorism is wide spread, every government in the world engages in it in one way or another. and every relegion in the world has had someone do something stupid while using its name for thier cause. How come you havent pointed out any flaws in any of the other major relegions that exist? "Your answer will be, check my website in the fineprint and click the link and cick that link and there it is."..why havent you dedicated your time in to disproving or BADGEREING,any of the other religions? Its cuz your full of shit Yada. your a silver spoon kid who has never been in a conflict he couldnt pay his way out of. you run companies to the floor and move on. You have traveled all over the world at the expense of thousands of AMERICANS who have lost thier jobs at the same companies you ran down. If your website wasnt so disrespectful and so biased I might have actually got to sit down and read some of it without bieng disgusted. If you would have had made your books and websites and radio appearances , less hatefull and more knowledgable, You might have a greater follwoing. But, you dont and you didnt. Its obvious that you are meerly attacking muslims with no intention of satisfying your YAHWEH...if so and your "GOD" condones or can justify the things you say and write about, then its pbvios why you chose that relegion. You talk about wanting to free people from islam, why not free them from mormonism, catholisism,lutheranism, satan worship, christianity...all those religeions have the same basic format as the quran. why chose one to place all the blame on....Its man who is to blame for this mess...and you are just as stupid as the rest of relisions that follow the god they belive to be true.

You can atack my grammer, but i was typing fast and had no time to correct it.

If your website is an attempt to get me to belive in yahweh, thanks, but no thanks.


-MD


Yada's response:

Quote:
From: Prophet of Doom (email@prophetofdoom.net)
Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 8:59:44 AM
To: "MD"

Dear Moron,

I don't claim that Yahweh's Scriptures are fact. Yahweh proves them to be such through prophecy.

I don't interpret Yahweh's Scriptures. I translate them and then encourage people to think about what God revealed.

I don't believe in Yahweh. I know Him.

All religions are a joke, as are you.

The only Scriptures which qualify as divine writ, are the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms. I wouldn't expect you to know that because you are ignorant, irrational, self-absorbed, and crude. You haven't a clue as to what Yahweh revealed about Himself.

I am not a believer, and I have not chosen a religion. I hate all religions. They are as deceptive and useless as you are.

To think that it doesn't matter between Muhammad and Yahweh is to say that you are ignorant of their claims. Pretending to be enlightened, you are a fool.

But, you got one thing right, you are doomed.

If I am wrong about you, which I doubt, read Prophet of Doom, and lean why Islam is pure rubbish, and why 95% of terrorists are Muslims. And then read Yada Yahweh and discover who God really is, and come to understand why Yahweh hates religion, why He embraces those who thoughtfully seek Him, and come to appreciate why He ignores nincompoops.

But if not, stop embarrassing yourself by mindlessly criticizing something you haven't even read. It makes you look like an idiot.


Yada



If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#128 Posted : Friday, May 1, 2009 4:00:47 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 4:53 PM, "RS wrote:

hello.I want to ask can I be a camicaze I not so good in english but I want to die and kill minimum aubout 50 people it cant be and more but nobody kills a chirldrend fuck american.yuo write me back I have my people AND iFUCKING CRAZY.I WANT MEET OSAMA BINGLADEL ITS MY GOOD.AFGANISTAN YUOR MY PEOPLE NOBODY KILLS OURS CHIRDREN WRITE MY BACK. I WANT DIER BEFORE I I KILLN GUN I CANT DAY BEFORE I KILL AMERICAN PEOPLE.I LOVE I WAIT YOR WRITE ME BACK./NOBODY CAN KILL THE CHIRDREN
FUCK AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1PLEASE HELP ME I WANT KILL SOMEBODY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I WAITING.WAITING.WAITING.WAITING


Yada's response:


Quote:
Re: ‏
From: Prophet of Doom (email@prophetofdoom.net)
Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 9:08:52 AM
To: "R"
Character set: Learn more
Dear Islamic Terrorist,

All I can say for certain is that you are ignorant, irrational, immoral, and insane. Hopefully, you are as bad a terrorist as you are a person and only blow yourself up.

While I was and remain against the war in Afghanistan, killing those who sought to bring freedom to Afghanistan, and who sought to bring justice to the Islamic terrorists who have butchered millions of children the world over, is a really stupid idea.

Start learning. Stop hating. Start caring. Stop killing. Leave Islam. Come to know God.

Yada


"R" follows-up:

Quote:
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 5:38 PM, "RS" wrote:

Isee yuor love america so fuck yuor self I BLOW YUOR YUOR NOT HELPING ME I FINK AFGANISTAN ITS COOL BUT YUO FUCK YURE SELL I DO MY SELF BEY!!!!!FUCK YUOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I HATE AMERICA AND ALL PEOPLE I JUST WANT TO KILL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Yada:


Quote:
Re: ‏
From: Prophet of Doom (email@prophetofdoom.net)
Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 10:21:06 AM
To: "RS"

You are very articulate and persuasive. I'm sure your mother is very proud.

Do the world a favor, and start and end your killing spree with yourself.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#129 Posted : Saturday, May 2, 2009 6:30:52 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 3:30 AM, "BB" wrote:

Dear Sir;

Thank you for clearly, definitively and accurately describing the pain of my heart. I am too uneducated to express it. My ignorance and naivety has lost my oldest children to Islam. May God help us all.


God Bless You and Keep You

-BB


Yada's response:


Quote:
Re: Beautiful!‏
From: Prophet of Doom (email@prophetofdoom.net)
Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 11:56:44 PM
To: "BB"

B,

I am sorry for your loss. The only pain greater than seeing a child die prematurely, is to see them surrender their soul to a demonic doctrine.

My hope for you is that you continue to educate yourself, reading Prophet of Doom and Yada Yahweh, so that when opportunities arise, you will be able to give your children a lifeline.

Islam cannot survive exposure. It shrivels and dies in the light.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Robskiwarrior  
#130 Posted : Saturday, May 2, 2009 6:51:19 AM(UTC)
Robskiwarrior
Joined: 7/4/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,470
Man
Location: England

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Seriously how did the guy in post #133 actually know how to send an email... lol
Signature Updated! Woo that was old...
Offline Noach  
#131 Posted : Saturday, May 2, 2009 12:57:19 PM(UTC)
Noach
Joined: 7/5/2007(UTC)
Posts: 127


Yea, it's amazing that someone's brain can at some point completely ooz out of their head and yet still somehow be able to push the send button. I can picture this complete idiot easily blowing himself up trying to test his home made 4th of July fireworks bomb. If we could only be so lucky.
Offline bitnet  
#132 Posted : Sunday, May 3, 2009 8:14:54 AM(UTC)
bitnet
Joined: 7/3/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,120

Phew! That crackpot sure got freaky with his words. If that is his real state of mind, it's as possessed as Linda Blair's character was in The Exorcist. He definitely has a demonic spirit and will not know Truth even if it stared him in the face. His hatred of life will be his undoing. He has written his own demise and is proud of it. What a warped mind his religion created!
The reverence of Yahweh is the beginning of Wisdom.
Offline Yada  
#133 Posted : Monday, May 4, 2009 7:36:28 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:35 AM, "MT" wrote:

Greeting to Yada Winn

I would like to express my special respect for the commitment you have shown to reveal the truth about Islam. I am a priest from Ethiopia currently visiting canada and USA. I am deeply concerned for the growing tension in East Africa related to terrorism. I have seen my self the merciless killings of Islamic terrorits . I read your book and I was very impressed with your analysis on Prophet of Doom. I am very interested to talk to you if you are accessible.

I hope I will got your response soon

Father( Priest ) "MT"
Ethiopian Orthodox Church


Yada's response:

Quote:

Re: Contact‏
From: Prophet of Doom (email@prophetofdoom.net)
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 11:57:40 PM
To: "MT"

M,

Thank you for reading Prophet of Doom and for being willing to engage in this battle for the hearts, minds, and souls of men and women. A friend of mine recently visited Ethiopia with a team of doctors, mostly Messianic Jews, and they were excited to see healing miracles in their midst.

I almost died in Ethiopia thirty years ago of malaria. But, in that it caused me to go back home rather than continue my tour, it saved my life. I held a ticket for the first plane Islamic terrorists bombed.

I am not particularly in tune with the differences between the Orthodox Ethiopian Church and the rest of Christendom, other than my understanding is that with the Falacian influence, you observe Yahweh's seven called-out assemblies. Is that so?

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#134 Posted : Saturday, May 9, 2009 7:53:03 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
From: "NM"
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 7:43 AM
To: email@ProphetofDoom.net

F*ck you, how dare u rite lie and wrong things abt Islam n our Prophet... you r a son of a bitch, u mother is a prostitute, n she was f*cked by a pig n stray dogs, only then u wer born..


Yada's response:


Quote:
Re: how dare u rite lie‏
From: Prophet of Doom (email@prophetofdoom.net)
Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 1:40:37 AM
To: "NM"

NM,

You are a perfect Muslim, equal parts ignorant, irrational, and immoral. Everything you have stated is either the opposite of what is actually true, or simply gibberish.

It is amazing that someone as obviously corrupted by religion as you are, would help a site like ours expose the reason Islam is such an abomination. But, nonetheless, you have and we continue to be appreciative of you moronic contribution.

After all, what right does a moral person have for exposing the fact that the oldest Islamic sources confirm that Muhammad was a rapist, pedophile, incestuous, assassin, mass murderer, slave trader, liar, thief, and ruthless terrorist, besides what his rubbish has done to your mind, heart, and soul?

POD

If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#135 Posted : Saturday, May 9, 2009 7:55:15 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 2:03 AM, "FY" wrote:

These quoted passages are all false and lies – Please you cant justify lies, i know the quraan back and forth and what you write is blasphemy!



This is a hypocrisy, as all your information is totally wrong and shows what Christian character really is - Hypocrites and liars and deceptive.



May Allah have peace on your soul and show you the right path for you will surely one day taste death and then you cant hide!


Yada's response:


Quote:
Re: ‏
From: Prophet of Doom (email@prophetofdoom.net)
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:51:20 AM
To: "FY"

FY,

Congradulations, FY. You will the Suicidal Muslim of the Month award.

Since the 5000 citations from the Islamic quran/recital, hadith/oral reports, sira/biography, and tarikh/history in Prophet of Doom are quoted from the world's most respected translations, most of them Islamic, for them to be "false and lies" their source, Muhammad and Allah, would have to be false liars. And while that is true, it isn't the point you wanted to make.

It is blasphemy to call Allah God and to promote the Islamic quran, hadith, sira, and tarikh as being true, when all informed, rational people know them to be false.

Yahweh is God, and His Scripture is composed of the Torah, Prophets, and Psalams. Their message is the antithesis of Islam's, which proves Allah was lying when he claimed to have inspired them.

Allah is Satan, and as such, he has no authority over my soul. But, he owns yours. Because I know, trust, and rely upon Yahweh, I will live forever, camping out with God. You, on the other hand, with your faith in Allah, will spend eternity with him in the very place the koran tells us that he spends his days, torturing the souls of hypocrites (defined in the 9th surah as peaceful muslims), christians, and jews.

If you weren't so ignorant, if you had actually read what you are condemning, you would know that I'm not a Christian. But falsely accusing those who accurately accuse Islam is the one things Muslims do best.


Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#136 Posted : Monday, May 11, 2009 5:35:21 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Yada recently did this interview on KGAB:



The main page is here: http://new.kgab.com/dyn_page.php?id=13
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline edStueart  
#137 Posted : Monday, May 11, 2009 8:53:58 AM(UTC)
edStueart
Joined: 10/29/2008(UTC)
Posts: 370
Location: Philadelphia

Yada wrote:

But falsely accusing those who accurately accuse Islam is the one things Muslims do best.



KaChow!
"You shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free."
But first, it will piss you off!
Offline Yada  
#138 Posted : Saturday, July 18, 2009 7:40:38 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

On July 6th, 2009, "AH" wrote the following to email@prophetofdoom.net:

fyi...did you know that the Holy Quran is the only book that can be memorized by anyone. Please look into this. This is how the Holy Quran will remain the same till the end of time because of this miracle. Here's a challenge for you and anyone else...try to memorize a book that is similar in size to the Holy Quran and you will not be able to. But when you or anyone else that doesn't even speak Arabic tries to learn/memorize the Holy Quran you will be able to with ease... not sure what you call it but i think its a miracle.



That same day, I replied:

Like most Muslims, your facts and conclusions are wrong. And even if it were true, which it is not, it wouldn't change the fact that the Qur'an is the worst book ever written by any rational, linguistic, or moral standard.

Have a nice day.

Yada




The following day, on July 7th, Atif Husain wrote back. That same afternoon, I responded to his email, answering his allegations in the context of the Muslim’s letter:

Thank you for the reply.

not sure why you dont believe that the quran is the only book that can be memorized. millions of people have it memorized including my self. this is the miracle of our beloved prophet.


Dear Muslim,

Fact: Many books can be memorized. The Qur'an is not special in this regard. This is not a miracle, and Muhammad was not a prophet. The only miracle here is that anyone would waste their time with such obvious foolishness.



To call Muhammad "beloved" is to say that you love his example, that of a pedophile, rapist, mass murderer, slave trader, thief, and terrorist. To infer that such a man is worthy of devotion reveals the extent of what Muhammad and Allah have done to your conscience, to your ability to be rational and moral.



i just wanted to put this out there for you to research and not just brush off. if you are even a bit sensible, you would look into this. and try to memorize your books or any book and try to memorize the quran. you will experience the miracle.


Fact: It is a waste of time to memorize something that can be read.

The value of a book is in its content, not in its rhythm or rhyme. And that is where the Qur'an is a complete waste.

It's poorly plagiarized from the Babylonian Talmud,
it isn't accurate scientifically or historically,
it's hopelessly repetitive,
it is so contradictory it excuses contradictions,
it is jumbled together without the benefit of chronological or topical organization,
its most prevalent theme is a childish argument between Muhammad and the Meccans,
the Medina surahs are violent to a fault,
much of what it has to say is grotesquely immoral,
most every important word is Hebrew or Greek when it claims to be pure Arabic,
there are countless missing words and made up words devoid of meaning,
and its foundational claim, that it confirms that which it contradicts, proves that it is completely worthless--a total waste of your time and your soul.


and i wont say anything bad about anyone's faith...my challege to all faiths is to show proof that their religion is true... no one has anything they can provide as proof.


Your wannabe god Allah condemns other religions, so you might as well. Furthermore, condemning religion is a good thing. All religions are manmade constructs designed to enrich and empower clerics and kings. And that is why Yahweh hates them.

Yahweh, unlike Allah, actually proves that His Torah, Prophets and Psalms are reliable and trustworthy by filling them with exacting predictions which have come true. Allah couldn't do this, and as a result, his "verification" is laughable and lame, even untrue.



the holy Quran is the only book that is the same as it was when it was first revealed. since it has not changed even a single word or letter, it is due to the miracle of memorization. and God made it this way so that only the Quran can stay in tact.


That is factually untrue. You might learn something if you were to read the Source Material Appendix, Islam's Dark Past: http://www.prophetofdoom..._Islams_Dark_Past.Islam.

The oldest extant manuscripts of the Qur'an differ substantially from those published today. Further, the oldest Qur'ans were written in paleo-Arabic, a language where all of the vowels are missing, and many letters are indistinguishable from one another. There was no punctuation, nor verse designations. Therefore, your conclusion is incorrect.

There are Hadith which demonstrate that the hearsay method of conveying the Qur'an failed before Muhammad's death, which means that memorization didn't prevail. More important, if the Qur'an was transmitted accurately, all that proves is that Allah is an immoral nincompoop based upon its current content.



all other books will be tampered with. the versus you are refering to are translations. and in the worst language possible, English. English is such a restricted language. try to learn another language and then understand the true translations.


You finally got something partially right: everything religious men and women touch is tampered with, including the Qur'an. But alas, you revert to ignorance thereafter.

The Arabic version of the Qur'an you have memorized is a translation from paleo-Arabic, a language more divergent from MSA than Latin is from Italian.

Impartial linguistic scholars tell us that second only to Chinese, Arabic is the world's most impoverished language in the world. And then to add insult to injury, most every essential term in the Qur'an is Hebrew or Greek, and not Arabic. Further, written Arabic didn't even exist until the late sixth century CE, and even then it was created by Syrian Christians as a derivative of Aramaic for the purpose of sharing Yahweh's Word with Arabs.

While my expertise is Hebrew and Greek, English is the lingua franca of the enlightened world. To suggest that Allah was so lame that his revelation is the only text in the world which cannot be translated is to confirm that your god was a horrible communicator.


once you have tried this....then contact me and let me know what the outcome is.

good day.



Since I've already done something far more valuable than memorizing Allah's recital, by reordering it chronologically and setting it into the context of Muhammad's life as documented in the Hadith, I have a more meaningful challenge for you: read it.

Yada






To his credit, Atif Husain was persistent. To his same, he ignored every important point I raised in my first two letters. Pondering the trivial, he wrote:



one more time....you still have not provided any proof regarding memorization of any book.

you stated that: Fact: Many books can be memorized. The Qur'an is not special in this regard.



can you tell me which book that is the same size or even smaller that can be memorized completely?

I have challenged many people and they failed. a fellow at my work who happens to be a non muslim tried this and failed. He, however, was able to memorize a page from the quran even though he did not understand a word.

so please send me a list of books that you claim can be memorized word for word.


------------------------------------------------



To which (out of character) I responded to tersely:





The Bible. It's four times longer and many have done it.







While I am certain that corresponding with Atif Husain was a complete waste of time with regard to his soul, the hope is that others, not so corrupted by their religion, will benefit from the exchange. And that is why I engaged one more time.



Once again, my responses are set into the context of his arguments:




Which bible are you referring to? There are a million different bibles in the world. which one is the one you claim can be memorized. and you say many people have it memorized. so untrue. if that were the case you wouldnt have soo many different versions contradicting one another. i`m not talking about the translations. i`m talking about the so called original texts or scriptures.


Dear Muslim Apologist,

It is a shame to see what your religion has done to your ability to process information. Conducting a conversation with you is frustrating as a result.

Like most people afflicted by religion, you are unwilling to consider evidence counter to your beliefs and unable to process it when it is thrust upon you. And yet you are willing to accept, even promote, the most dubious claims made on behalf of your religion, even when the credibility of the evidence or reasoning is easily demonstrated to be invalid.

You base your claims on things which are not true, and you ignore that which is true. You emphasize that which is irrelevant and you fail to notice that which is relevant.

Specifically, even if it were true that the Qur'an was the only book of its size which could be easily memorized, it wouldn't prove that it was true or divinely inspired. It's content, which is false, immoral, plagiarized, vicious, and repulsive, is proof that it was neither.

To answer your completely meaningless question: the most commonly memorized Bible in English was the KJV. But the most often memorized overall was the Latin Vulgate.

And while many people have memorized both, doing so is a very poor use of time, which is why most people haven't bothered to memorize it. The investment of time required to do so, with a resource which is readily available in writing, is much better spent elsewhere.

One of the reasons the population of Islamic nations is so poorly educated is that Muslim children are forced to spend their days memorizing the Qur'an, many in a language they don't even understand, rather than learning something useful. And that is why there isn't one university in the Islamic world listed among the 100 best in the world. It is why there haven't been any significant Islamic contributions to science, medicine, technology, literature, or the arts over the past thousand years. Islamic nations don't produce a single product which is viable internationally. In fact, the 50 nations controlled by Islam are among the most impoverished, least free, least educated, least civil, most sexist, and most repressive and oppressive places to live on earth.

Continuing to correct your statements, there are actually billions of bibles in the world, not millions of them. More volumes of it have been printed than any other book in human history.

Different translations, however, don't make for different bibles in the sense of them being different from the original. I own twelve translations of the Qur'an in English and two in Arabic. The fact that they differ from one another does not indicate that the sources from which they were translated were materially divergent.

Moreover, as I told you previously, the Arabic Qur'an you memorized was itself translated from paleo-Arabic--and doing so was arbitrary based upon the numerous deficiencies of the original alphabet.

The oldest partial copy of a Qur'an dates to around 725 CE, 100 years after Muhammad made up its surahs to satiate his lust for power, sex, and money. These fragments, found in Yemen, differ substantially from the next oldest witnesses dating to the late 8th century.

What's interesting here is the stunning lack of old manuscripts. Even during the 100 year Islamic reign in Damascus following Muhammad's death, we don't have a single Koran manuscript, although we have countless documents related to their conquests, political, and business transactions.

According to the oldest Islamic records, the reason that there are so stunningly few old witnesses to the Koran is a result of having all but one of the conflicting versions of it burned in the late 8th century. The purpose of doing so was to hide the reality that you, like all Muslims, are unable to accept.

By comparison, there are hundreds of Old Covenant Hebrew manuscripts dating between 700 BCE and 70 CE. And there are 70 Greek Renewed Covenant manuscripts dating between 60 CE and 300 CE. And all of this occurred before the invention of paper, whereby the wealth of ancient records proliferated in the late 4th and 5th centuries.

These old manuscripts are remarkably similar to one another. And while newer, post Constantine, manuscripts differ from the older ones, that is simply evidence of religious tampering, not of the veracity of the inspired text.

The destruction of competing Koran manuscripts provides similar evidence of religious tampering, but in this case in reverse. The message here is: trust Yahweh, not man.

Based upon the great wealth of old manuscripts of the Torah, Prophets, Psalms, and Renewed Covenant Writings, informed people know what Yahweh and Yahshua said and did--all as a result of researching this evidence. But by contrast, Islam's formation is a blank slate, dark and unknown, one erased by the burning of books. So in fact, the opposite of what you have been led to believe is actually true.

The notion that hearsay evidence is as valid and reliable as written documentation, as you allege, is contrary to every judicial system conceived by man. It is irrational. The idea that the Qur'an is more similar to the original than the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms because one was passed along by hearsay for a century while the other was written down and preserved in writing has to be among the dumbest arguments made on behalf of Islam. Honestly, it would only fool a fool.

I used the word "hearsay" because that is precisely the method upon which the Koran is known to us today. The definition of hearsay is oral testimony one or more individuals removed from the original witness. Since the Quran wasn't written down for one hundred years, its existence is solely predicated upon hearsay four times over.

The fact is that there are no extant original autographs of the Torah, Prophets, Psalms, or Renewed Covenant Writings, and there are no extant original autographs of the Qur'an. But with one, we have hundreds of manuscripts validating the text, and with the other we don't.

But here is your problem as a Muslim, and this is significant. Yahweh, the God who inspired the Torah, Prophets, Psalms, and Renewed Covenant insisted that everything He said be written down by literate prophets. Allah, who alleges to be the same God, altered course after 2000 years of doing it the proper way, and conveyed his mantra to an illiterate man, living among illiterate men, in a community devoid of a written alphabet. Worse, this same Allah then claimed that his Recital confirmed the Torah, Prophets and Gospels when in fact, one is the antithesis of the other.

Yahweh said that a god by any other name, Allah for example, was a false god. The heart and soul of the Torah is Yahweh's seven Called-Out Assemblies, not one of which Islam recognizes. Rather than preach the Ten Commandments, Muhammad violated all of them. According to Yahweh, salvation is given to those who rely upon the sacrifice Yahshua made on our behalf. According to Allah, paradise is awarded to Jihadists who die killing others on behalf of their god.

The only informed, rational conclusion, therefore, is that Allah is neither Yahweh nor God and that he and his wannabe prophet were lying. As such, you should not be a Muslim, one who submits to them.




and i`m sure with all the research you have done, you probably know this that the muslims do not disgrace jesus or the cross.
the cross was a symbol created by the jews to mock the christians. to help them remember how they crucified prophet Isa pbuh.



Next time, before you write someone, critical of what they have written, you may want to avoid embarrasing yourself by actually reading what they have written. It's just a suggestion between us pen pals.

The Qur'anic "Jesus" is Isa, which you know. That is Arabic for Esau, which you don't know. Esau was the one person Yahweh called out by name to say that He hates him. The reason was that Esau married one of Ishmael's daughters and accepted Ishmael's religion. And that should be deeply troubling to you since Ishmael is Islam's patriarch and the Qur'an says that Islam is Ishmael's religion.

The presentation of Isa in the Quran bears no similarity whatsoever to the actual Messiyah Yahushua. Yahushua and Muhammad were complete opposites, as were their lives, words, deeds, and messages. The paths they present to heaven lead in opposite directions.

And that means that if Yahushua was telling the truth, Muhammad was lying. And since Muhammad claimed that the Messiyah was God's messenger, if Yahshua was lying, any text associating him with God is unreliable. Either way, you and every other Muslim on the planet is caught in a snare from which there is no way to escape.

Therefore, the Qur'an's failure to "disgrace Isa/Jesus" is irrelevant in that there is no correlation between Yahushua, the Messiyah, and the Koran's portrayal of Isa.

The Christian cross is a pagan symbol, so by not disgracing it, Allah was siding with the Babylonian religion--from which it emerges. Yahweh's Scripture makes no reference of any kind to a "cross," using the term "upright pillar" instead. The cross is a Catholic corruption.

Crucifixion was invented by the Assyrians around 500 BCE and then advanced by the Romans between 100 BCE and 300 CE. It was not a Jewish thing as you allege. It is a shame that you spent so much time memorizing the Qur'an, when instead, you should have been learning history.

And speaking of history, when Allah claimed that Pharaoh wanted to crucify Moses, he proved that he was a nincompoop. Crucifixion wouldn't be invented for a thousand years. Unlike Yahweh who meticulously and accurately predicted the future to prove that His Scripture could be trusted, Muhammad and his dark spirit Allah couldn't even get the past right.



i wouldn`t make false accuasations about any religion with baseless facts. and those translations on your website are not even from credible or authentic scholars. those are self proclaimed scholars.


The fact is, you have used "baseless facts" to "make false accusations about a religion" by incorrectly debasing the validity of the biblical text. So, this paragraph would make you an untrustworthy hypocrite according to the dictionary definitions of both terms.

As for my 1000-page accusation against the Islamic religion in Prophet of Doom--Islam's Terrorist Dogma in Muhammad's Own Words, the entirety of the book is based upon the five oldest and most reliable Islamic sources. These are the Qur'an, which is Muhammad's Recital, Ishaq's Sira, or Biography of Muhammad, Tabari's Tarikh, or History of Islam's Formation, and the topical Hadith Collections, or Oral Reports from Muhammad and his Companions, assembled by Bukhari and Muslim. It what they reveal is false, Islam is false, as the religion ceases to exist without them.

It is a lose-lose proposition for you and all Muslims. If the five oldest Islamic sources are unreliable, then Islam is unreliable as nothing is known about Muhammad, Allah, the Quran, Islamic Law, Mecca, or the Five Pillars without them. They are the only written witnesses to the formation of Islam compiled within 200 years of Muhammad's death.

However, if the five oldest Islamic sources are reliable, then Islam is untrue, because what is known of Muhammad is all bad. According to the oldest Islamic sources, Allah's lone witness was a terrorist, pedophile, mass murderer, rapist, thief, incestuous, slave trader, adulterer, pirate, sexual pervert and liar. When Allah's Qur'an insisted that his behavior was the best example to follow, it became immediately obvious that Allah was the opposite of moral, the opposite of truthful, the opposite of Yahweh, the opposite of God--indeed Satan.

As for your claim that the five translations of the Qur'an aren't "from credible or authentic scholars," you would be wrong again, which is probably why you don't present any evidence to back up your claim. In fact, it would be hard to find more credible Arabic scholars than the five Muslims responsible for the Ahmed Ali, Picthal, Shakir, Yusuf Ali, or Noble Qur'an translations, the last of which was prepared by Dr. Muhammad Taqi-ud Din Al-Hilali, Professor of Islamic Faith and Teachings at the Islamic University in Al-Madinah and Dr. Muhammad Muhsin Khan, the Director of the University Hospital at the same University.

The reality is: Prophet of Doom is the best documented, most accurate and revealing, most comprehensive and contextual, chronological presentation of Islam's five oldest and most reliable sources ever written. It is my gift to Muslims, and to those good Muslims terrorize. Ignore it at your peril.



I see that you have not really debated this in a civilized manner. I would challenge you to debate these things with some credible scholars like Dr Zakir Naik from India.


Hypocrisy is doing that which you condemn. You will probably never find a more civilized, more compassionate, more disciplined, or more comprehensive response to your positions than those I've written to you in hopes of awakening you to the lie that is Islam. And yet, it is you who have responded inappropriately.

For example, I have taken the time to respond to each of your claims, and yet you ignore everything I've shared with you. At the end of this letter, you will find a list of "debate things" which you missed.

I am aware of Dr. Zakir. Informed, rational people consider him to be a charlatan, a man whose debate strategy is designed to fool fools. He plays to an ignorant and irrational religious audience by avoiding the issue as you have done, by diverting attention to other religions like you have done, by making false claims which you have done, by misrepresenting Muhammad and Allah as you have done, and by the use of straw men, another tactic you too have used.

It is impossible to "debate" someone like that because they don't debate. They put on a show which plays to their audience. He is more entertainer than scholar, and he is playing with your soul.

If you had read Prophet of Doom, you would know that I have already presented my debate position, replete with 5,000 citations from the Islamic scriptures. The evidence is as unassailable as are the conclusions drawn from it. I prove beyond any doubt that Islam is not true, that Muhammad was not a prophet, and that Allah is not God. So why not invite Zakir to refute it?


if you honestly believe in what you say on your websites or books, you shouldnt be afraid to a debate with someone who has the answers not only to islam but to christianity.

I've not only debated a score of Islamic scholars on live, nationally and regionally broadcast radio programs; I've done something far better. I've documented my case against Islam and made that case available free in its entirety to everyone the world over. And by presenting what I've come to know and understand regarding Islam's oldest sources under my real name, you'd have to look long and hard to find someone with more courage.

As for Christianity, if you had read POD, you would have known that I'm not a Christian. Christianity is no better than Islam. In fact, the purpose of Yada Yahweh--A Conversation with God is to expose and condemn the religion of Christianity based upon what Yahweh had to say in the Torah, Prophets, Psalms and Renewed Covenant Writings.

So, if your confidence is not misplaced, Dr. Zakir should have no problem refuting Yada Yahweh in his spare time. But don't hold your breath.


and honestly you could have come up with a better answer than the bible.
pathetic.



So, by your definition, telling you the truth, that many people have memorized the Bible, a book four times longer than the Qur'an, when you claimed otherwise, is "pathetic." What's pathetic is your inability or unwillingness to deal with anything that I've written you. I dare say, it might even be “uncivilized.” But then again, my definition of what’s pathetic and what’s civilized is the opposite of yours. And that is because our Gods are opposites.



Having “debated” a thousand Muslims like yourself, I’m fairly certain that you’ll ignore this advice, but if you have any interest in understanding why I am absolutely certain that Islam cannot possibly be true, read Prophet of Doom. And if after doing that, if you have any interest in understanding why I know for certain that Yahweh is God, and that He is reliable, read Yada Yahweh. And if not, at least I’ve left you without excuse.

Yada


I promised a review of the "debate things" you ignored. Here is that list.

1. Many books can be memorized.

2. It is a waste of time to memorize something that can be read.

3. The Qur'an is not special in this regard, and therefore not a miraculous.

4. Muhammad was not a prophet.

5. The only miracle is that anyone would waste their time with such obvious foolishness.

6. To call Muhammad "beloved" is to say that you love his example, that of a pedophile, rapist, mass murderer, slave trader, thief, and terrorist. To infer that such a man is worthy of devotion reveals the extent of what Muhammad and Allah have done to your conscience, to your ability to be rational and moral.

7. The value of a book is in its content, not in its rhythm or rhyme. And that is where the Qur'an is a complete waste.

8. The Qur'an is poorly plagiarized from the Babylonian Talmud.

9. The Qur'an is not accurate scientifically or historically.

10. The Qur'an is hopelessly repetitive.

11. The Qur'an is so contradictory it excuses contradictions.

12. The Qur'an is jumbled together without the benefit of chronological or topical organization.

13. The Qur'an’s most prevalent theme is a childish argument between Muhammad and the Meccans.

14. The Medina surahs of the Qur’an are violent to a fault.

15. Much of what the Qur’an has to say is grotesquely immoral.

16. Most every important word in the Quran is Hebrew or Greek when it claims to be pure Arabic.

17. There are countless missing words and made up words devoid of meaning in the Qur’an.

18. The Qur'an’s foundational claim, that it confirms that which it contradicts, proves that it is completely worthless--a total waste of your time and your soul.

19. Your wannabe god Allah condemns other religions, so you might as well. Furthermore, condemning religion is a good thing. All religions are manmade constructs designed to enrich and empower clerics and kings. And that is why Yahweh hates them.

20. Yahweh, unlike Allah, actually proves that His Torah, Prophets and Psalms are reliable and trustworthy by filling them with exacting predictions which have come true. Allah couldn't do this, and as a result, his "verification" is laughable and lame, even untrue.

21. Your claim that “the Qur’an is the only book that is the same as it was when it was first revealed” is factually untrue.

22. You might learn something if you were to read the Source Material Appendix, Islam's Dark Past: http://www.prophetofdoom..._Islams_Dark_Past.Islam.

23. The oldest extant manuscripts of the Qur'an differ substantially from those published today.

24. The oldest Qur'ans were written in paleo-Arabic, a language where all of the vowels are missing, and many letters are indistinguishable from one another. There was no punctuation, nor verse designations. Therefore, your conclusion is incorrect.

25. There are Hadith which demonstrate that the hearsay method of conveying the Qur'an failed before Muhammad's death, which means that memorization didn't prevail.

26. More important, if the Qur'an was transmitted accurately, all that proves is that Allah is an immoral nincompoop based upon its current content.

27. You finally got something partially right: everything religious men and women touch is tampered with, including the Qur'an. But alas, you revert to ignorance thereafter in criticizing English.

28. The Arabic version of the Qur'an you have memorized is a translation from paleo-Arabic, a language more divergent from MSA than Latin is from Italian.

29. Impartial linguistic scholars tell us that second only to Chinese, Arabic is the world's most impoverished language.

30. To add insult to injury, most every essential term in the Qur'an is Hebrew or Greek, and not Arabic.

31. Written Arabic didn't even exist until the late sixth century CE, and even then it was created by Syrian Christians as a derivative of Aramaic for the purpose of sharing Yahweh's Word with Arabs.

32. While my expertise is Hebrew and Greek, English is the lingua franca of the enlightened world.

33. To suggest that Allah was so lame that his revelation is the only text in the world which cannot be translated is to confirm that your god was a horrible communicator.

34. Since I've already done something far more valuable than memorizing Allah's recital, by reordering it chronologically and setting it into the context of Muhammad's life as documented in the Hadith, I have a more meaningful challenge for you: read it.


Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#139 Posted : Saturday, August 29, 2009 10:58:07 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:51 AM, "JB" wrote:

On the Friday August 14th Yada and Yowel talked a bit about the Barbary wars, and specifically Thomas Jefferson’s talks with the Muslim pirates. I was wondering if either have ever read the book Power, Faith and Fantasy by Michael Oren. Oren I believe does a great job of elaborating this, as well as America’s history of Middle Eastern relations, from the founding to the present day. I think it is a great book if you haven’t read it, and would love to hear your views and insight on it if you have.



Thanks for your great books, and show.



-JB


Yada's response:

Quote:
JB,

I have not read it--but I'm sure that it would be a great read. If you have a few ready quotes from the book that you'd like me to discuss, please send them to me and I'll include them in an upcoming program.

However, so that you know, my interest in Islam has faded considerably since my time writing and promoting Prophet of Doom. I wallowed in the rubbish of Islam for five years, and have done my part to expose and condemn the religion. Even now, I am having second thoughts on the Wednesday radio program focusing on Islam. Friday's news program is sufficient when it come to Islam's legacy.

As you know, I am much more interested in what Yahweh has to say than Muhammad.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#140 Posted : Saturday, August 29, 2009 11:00:32 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
From: RM
Date: Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 5:14 PM
Subject: Another terrorist gets another hero's welcome and for some reason the West reacts with surprise

As if welcoming a mass-murderer responsible for the deaths of nearly 300 people as a hero wasn't bad enough...

http://ronmossad.blogspo...eros-welcome-hooray.html

We have to sit and listen to our naive leaders express shock and dismay at the proceedings - as if it were something new.

When will people wake up?


Yada's response:

Quote:
Yow'el

This article reads like something you might have written-especially the captions.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#141 Posted : Saturday, August 29, 2009 11:02:52 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 1:04 PM, "SZ" wrote:

Hello Yada

Thank you again, and again. I am hooked on your website. Like I wrote to you earlier, You guys are the bestest — the very bestest. Thank you again.

One Question: Who or what is “Tabari”as in “Tabari I:321”? Is this a surah in the Qur’an? Please help me.


Yada's response:


Quote:
Re: Thank You Again and Again‏
From: Prophet of Doom (email@prophetofdoom.net)
Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 3:09:46 AM
To: "SZ"
SJ,

The Ta'rikh is the oldest, most trusted and comprehensive history of Islam’s formation and Muhammad’s example, called Sunnah. It was written by Tabari, and is a collection of Hadith arranged chronologically. His History of al-Tabari is formatted like the Bible. It begins with Islamic creation and ends with the acts of Muhammad’s companions. Tabari is a compilation of Hadith quotes and Qur'an passages. As such, it provides the best skeleton upon which to flesh out the character of Muhammad and the nature of fundamental Islam. A Hadith is an oral report from Muhammad or his companions. Muslims believe that Hadith were inspired by Allah, making them scripture.

The History of al-Tabari, called the Ta'rikh, was written by Abu Muhammad bin al-Tabari between 870 and 920 A.D. His monumental work was translated and published in 1987 through 1997 by the State University of New York Press. I quote from volumes I, II, VI, VII, VIII, and IX. Tabari's History consists entirely of Islamic Hadith. It is arranged chronologically. Tabari is Islam’s oldest uncensored source.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#142 Posted : Saturday, August 29, 2009 11:10:22 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Tyrone Brumwell <tyronebrumwell@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

My name is "TB". I am a missionary with People of the Book Lutheran Outreach (Poblo.org). Our primary outreach is to Muslims. Last year my family and I lost everything in the flood. One of the things I lost was a hardcover copy of "Prophet of Doom". This was given to me by my brother-in-law, and I found it a great reference.

Yesterday, when I was preaching, I was interrupted by shouting. Someone had stood up and was attempting to defend Islam. I spent a long time with this individual afterwards and I made considerable headway. However, when I returned home, I went to grab my copy of "Prophet of Doom" and realized I had lost it in the flood. I then went to Amazon.com and found they no longer carry it. Then I went to BarnesAndNoble.com and saw they didn't carry it either. There are individuals who are selling used copies, however, they are in upwards of $100. Can you tell me where I can get a new copy?


-TB


Rev. "TB"
Missionary
People of the Book Lutheran Outreach (Poblo.org)
Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod (LCMS)


Yada's response:


Quote:
Re: Book: Prophet of Doom‏
From: Prophet of Doom (email@prophetofdoom.net)
Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 3:28:01 AM
To: "TB"
Tyrone,

I am sorry that a flood destroyed your possessions. I am pleased, however, that you were able to use Prophet of Doom effectively while witnessing to Muslims.

So that you know, the entire book is available free online in HTML, PDF, and MP3 files. There are only a handful of remaining hardback copies of POD, all of which were given to our webmaster. I have forwarded this to him.

He will be sympathetic and supportive of your willingness to engage in the battle to draw Muslims away from Islam, but not of your Christianity. He and I know Yahweh, and have been adopted into His family. We therefore recognize the many and important ways the Christian religion has corrupted Yahweh's Word. As a result, we would not be interested in helping draw people out of one religion, no matter how corrupt into another, especially a counterfeit.

Yahweh is interested only in upright and engaged, conversant and familial, covenant relationships. And the path home begins with the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms.

That said, should you be willing to read Yada Yahweh, free at: http://yadayahweh.com/Yada_Yahweh_Genesis.YHWH, you will be much better prepared to save Muslims, and will no doubt motivate our webmaster to part with one of his remaining copies of POD.

Stay safe, and continue to expose and condemn Islam.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#143 Posted : Saturday, August 29, 2009 11:21:17 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 6:55 PM, "JAM" wrote:


Good day,

I began to read on your website and I saw a hilarious quote:

"The Bible, by comparison, had forty authors, all literate, who told a consistent story over the course of fifteen centuries."

You know, we can talk for hours who Mohammed really was, but I think your own "truthfulness" is destroyed for all times.
How much truth can I expect from you after this statement? Here are some Bible inconsistencies. I have looked at the first five
and I can tell you, the story the bible authors are telling doesn't even come close to consistence. You can look at the rest if you want. You can
also find them on --> http://www.infidels.org/...gan/inconsistencies.html
But I think you're a christian missionary, so be warned: These inconsistencies might shake your faith....FOREVER.

PS: Since I caught you lying, I think you might be a little influenced by Paul (Roman 3:7):
"For if through my falsehood God's truthfulness glorifies him even more, why am I still being condemned as a sinner?"
GE 1:3-5 On the first day, God created light, then separated light and darkness.
GE 1:14-19 The sun (which separates night and day) wasn't created until the fourth day.
GE 1:11-12, 26-27 Trees were created before man was created.
GE 2:4-9 Man was created before trees were created.
GE 1:20-21, 26-27 Birds were created before man was created.
GE 2:7, 19 Man was created before birds were created.
GE 1:24-27 Animals were created before man was created.
GE 2:7, 19 Man was created before animals were created.
GE 1:26-27 Man and woman were created at the same time.
GE 2:7, 21-22 Man was created first, woman sometime later.
GE 1:28 God encourages reproduction.
LE 12:1-8 God requires purification rites following childbirth which, in effect, makes childbirth a sin. (Note: The period for purification following the birth of a daughter is twice that for a son.)
GE 1:31 God was pleased with his creation.
GE 6:5-6 God was not pleased with his creation.
(Note: That God should be displeased is inconsistent with the concept of omniscience.)
GE 2:4, 4:26, 12:8, 22:14-16, 26:25 God was already known as "the Lord" (Jahveh or Jehovah) much earlier than the time of Moses.
EX 6:2-3 God was first known as "the Lord" (Jahveh or Jehovah) at the time of the Egyptian Bondage, during the life of Moses.
GE 2:17 Adam was to die the very day that he ate the forbidden fruit.
GE 5:5 Adam lived 930 years.
GE 2:15-17, 3:4-6 It is wrong to want to be able to tell good from evil.
HE 5:13-14 It is immature to be unable to tell good from evil.
GE 4:4-5 God prefers Abel's offering and has no regard for Cain's.
2CH 19:7, AC 10:34, RO 2:11 God shows no partiality. He treats all alike.
GE 4:9 God asks Cain where his brother Able is.
PR 15:3, JE 16:17, 23:24-25, HE 4:13 God is everywhere. He sees everything. Nothing is hidden from his view.
GE 4:15, DT 32:19-27, IS 34:8 God is a vengeful god.
EX 15:3, IS 42:13, HE 12:29 God is a warrior. God is a consuming fire.
EX 20:5, 34:14, DT 4:24, 5:9, 6:15, 29:20, 32:21 God is a jealous god.
LE 26:7-8, NU 31:17-18, DT 20:16-17, JS 10:40, JG 14:19, EZ 9:5-7 The Spirit of God is (sometimes) murder and killing.
NU 25:3-4, DT 6:15, 9:7-8, 29:20, 32:21, PS 7:11, 78:49, JE 4:8, 17:4, 32:30-31, ZP 2:2 God is angry. His anger is sometimes fierce.
2SA 22:7-8 (KJV) "I called to the Lord; ... he heard my voice; ... The earth trembled and quaked, ... because he was angry. Smoke came from his nostrils. Consuming fire came from his mouth, burning coals blazed out of it."
EZ 6:12, NA 1:2, 6 God is jealous and furious. He reserves wrath for, and takes revenge on, his enemies. "... who can abide in the fierceness of his anger? His fury is poured out like fire, and rocks are thrown down by him."
2CO 13:11, 14, 1JN 4:8, 16 God is love.
GA 5:22-23 The fruit of the Spirit of God is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control.
GE 4:16 Cain went away (or out) from the presence of the Lord.
JE 23:23-24 A man cannot hide from God. God fills heaven and earth.
GE 6:4 There were Nephilim (giants) before the Flood.
GE 7:21 All creatures other than Noah and his clan were annihilated by the Flood.
NU 13:33 There were Nephilim after the Flood.
GE 6:6. EX 32:14, NU 14:20, 1SA 15:35, 2SA 24:16 God does change his mind.
NU 23:19-20, 1SA 15:29, JA 1:17 God does not change his mind.
GE 6:19-22, 7:8-9, 7:14-16 Two of each kind are to be taken, and are taken, aboard Noah's Ark.
GE 7:2-5 Seven pairs of some kinds are to be taken (and are taken) aboard the Ark.
GE 7:1 Noah was righteous.
JB 1:1,8, JB 2:3 Job was righteous.
LK 1:6 Zechariah and Elizabeth were righteous.
JA 5:16 Some men are righteous, (which makes their prayers effective).
1JN 3:6-9 Christians become righteous (or else they are not really Christians).
RO 3:10, 3:23, 1JN 1:8-10 No one was or is righteous.
GE 7:7 Noah and his clan enter the Ark.
GE 7:13 They enter the Ark (again?).
GE 11:7-9 God sows discord.
PR 6:16-19 God hates anyone who sows discord.
GE 11:9 At Babel, the Lord confused the language of the whole world.
1CO 14:33 Paul says that God is not the author of confusion.
GE 11:12 Arpachshad [Arphaxad] was the father of Shelah.
LK 3:35-36 Cainan was the father of Shelah. Arpachshad was the grandfather of Shelah.
GE 11:26 Terah was 70 years old when his son Abram was born.
GE 11:32 Terah was 205 years old when he died (making Abram 135 at the time).
GE 12:4, AC 7:4 Abram was 75 when he left Haran. This was after Terah died. Thus, Terah could have been no more than 145 when he died; or Abram was only 75 years old after he had lived 135 years.
GE 12:7, 17:1, 18:1, 26:2, 32:30, EX 3:16, 6:2-3, 24:9-11, 33:11, NU 12:7-8, 14:14, JB 42:5, AM 7:7-8, 9:1 God is seen.
EX 33:20, JN 1:18, 1JN 4:12 God is not seen. No one can see God's face and live. No one has ever seen him.
GE 10:5, 20, 31 There were many languages before the Tower of Babel.
GE 11:1 There was only one language before the Tower of Babel.
GE 15:9, EX 20:24, 29:10-42, LE 1:1-7:38, NU 28:1-29:40, God details sacrificial offerings.
JE 7:21-22 God says he did no such thing.
GE 16:15, 21:1-3, GA 4:22 Abraham had two sons, Ishmael and Isaac.
HE 11:17 Abraham had only one son.
GE 17:1, 35:11, 1CH 29:11-12, LK 1:37 God is omnipotent. Nothing is impossible with (or for) God.
JG 1:19 Although God was with Judah, together they could not defeat the plainsmen because the latter had iron chariots.
GE 17:7, 10-11 The covenant of circumcision is to be everlasting.
GA 6:15 It is of no consequence.
GE 17:8 God promises Abraham the land of Canaan as an "everlasting possession."
GE 25:8, AC 7:2-5, HE 11:13 Abraham died with the promise unfulfilled.
GE 17:15-16, 20:11-12, 22:17 Abraham and his half sister, Sarai, are married and receive God's blessings.
LE 20:17, DT 27:20-23 Incest is wrong.
GE 18:20-21 God decides to "go down" to see what is going on.
PR 15:3, JE 16:17, 23:24-25, HE 4:13 God is everywhere. He sees everything. Nothing is hidden from his view.
GE 19:30-38 While he is drunk, Lot's two daughters "lie with him," become pregnant, and give birth to his offspring.
2PE 2:7 Lot was "just" and "righteous."
GE 22:1-12, DT 8:2 God tempts (tests) Abraham and Moses.
JG 2:22 God himself says that he does test (tempt).
1CO 10:13 Paul says that God controls the extent of our temptations.
JA 1:13 God tests (tempts) no one.
GE 27:28 "May God give you ... an abundance of grain and new wine."
DT 7:13 If they follow his commandments, God will bless the fruit of their wine.
PS 104:15 God gives us wine to gladden the heart.
JE 13:12 "... every bottle shall be filled with wine."
JN 2:1-11 According to the author of John, Jesus' first miracle was turning water to wine.
RO 14:21 It is good to refrain from drinking wine.
GE 35:10 God says Jacob is to be called Jacob no longer; henceforth his name is Israel.
GE 46:2 At a later time, God himself uses the name Jacob.
GE 36:11 The sons of Eliphaz were Teman, Omar, Zepho, Gatam, and Kenaz.
GE 36:15-16 Teman, Omar, Zepho, Kenaz.
1CH 1:35-36 Teman, Omar, Zephi, Gatam, Kenaz, Timna, and Amalek.
GE 49:2-28 The fathers of the twelve tribes of Israel are: Reuben, Simeon, Levi, Judah, Zebulun, Issachar, Dan, Gad, Asher, Naphtali, Joseph, and Benjamin.
RE 7:4-8 (Leaves out the tribe of Dan, but adds Manasseh.)
GE 50:13 Jacob was buried in a cave at Machpelah bought from Ephron the Hittite.
AC 7:15-16 He was buried in the sepulchre at Shechem, bought from the sons of Hamor.
EX 3:1 Jethro was the father-in-law of Moses.
NU 10:29, JG 4:11 (KJV) Hobab was the father-in-law of Moses.
EX 3:20-22, DT 20:13-17 God instructs the Israelites to despoil the Egyptians, to plunder their enemies.
EX 20:15, 17, LE 19:13 God prohibits stealing, defrauding, or robbing a neighbor.
EX 4:11 God decides who will be dumb, deaf, blind, etc.
2CO 13:11, 14, 1JN 4:8, 16 God is a god of love.
EX 9:3-6 God destroys all the cattle (including horses) belonging to the Egyptians.
EX 9:9-11 The people and the cattle are afflicted with boils.
EX 12:12, 29 All the first-born of the cattle of the Egyptians are destroyed.
EX 14:9 After having all their cattle destroyed, then afflicted with boils, and then their first-born cattle destroyed, the Egyptians pursue Moses on horseback.
EX 12:13 The Israelites have to mark their houses with blood in order for God to see which houses they occupy and "pass over" them.
PR 15:3, JE 16:17, 23:24-25, HE 4:13 God is everywhere. He sees everything. Nothing is hidden from God.
EX 12:37, NU 1:45-46 The number of men of military age who take part in the Exodus is given as more than 600,000. Allowing for women, children, and older men would probably mean that a total of about 2,000,000 Israelites left Egypt.
1KI 20:15 All the Israelites, including children, number only 7000 at a later time.
EX 15:3, 17:16, NU 25:4, 32:14, IS 42:13 God is a man of war--he is fierce and angry.
RO 15:33, 2CO 13:11, 14, 1JN 4:8, 16 God is a god of love and peace.
EX 20:1-17 God gave the law directly to Moses (without using an intermediary).
GA 3:19 The law was ordained through angels by a mediator (an intermediary).
EX 20:4 God prohibits the making of any graven images whatsoever.
EX 25:18 God enjoins the making of two graven images.
EX 20:5, 34:7, NU 14:18, DT 5:9, IS 14:21-22 Children are to suffer for their parent's sins.
DT 24:16, EZ 18:19-20 Children are not to suffer for their parent's sins.
EX 20:8-11, 31:15-17, 35:1-3 No work is to be done on the Sabbath, not even lighting a fire. The commandment is permanent, and death is required for infractions.
MK 2:27-28 Jesus says that the Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath (after his disciples were criticized for breaking the Sabbath).
RO 14:5, CN 2:14-16 Paul says the Sabbath commandment was temporary, and to decide for yourself regarding its observance.
EX 20:12, DT 5:16, MT 15:4, 19:19, MK 7:10, 10:19, LK 18:20 Honor your father and your mother is one of the ten commandments. It is reinforced by Jesus.
MT 10:35-37, LK 12:51-53, 14:26 Jesus says that he has come to divide families; that a man's foes will be those of his own household; that you must hate your father, mother, wife, children, brothers, sisters, and even your own life to be a disciple.
MT 23:9 Jesus says to call no man on earth your father.
EX 20:13, DT 5:17, MK 10:19, LK 18:20, RO 13:9, JA 2:11 God prohibits killing.
GE 34:1-35:5 God condones trickery and killing.
EX 32:27, DT 7:2, 13:15, 20:1-18 God orders killing.
2KI 19:35 An angel of the Lord slaughters 185,000 men.
(Note: See Atrocities section for many more examples.)
EX 20:14 God prohibits adultery.
HO 1:2 God instructs Hosea to "take a wife of harlotry."
EX 21:23-25, LE 24:20, DT 19:21 A life for a life, an eye for an eye, etc.
MT 5:38-44, LK 6:27-29 Turn the other cheek. Love your enemies.
EX 23:7 God prohibits the killing of the innocent.
NU 31:17-18, DT 7:2, JS 6:21-27, 7:19-26, 8:22-25, 10:20, 40, 11:8-15, 20, JG 11:30-39, 21:10-12, 1SA 15:3 God orders or approves the complete extermination of groups of people which include innocent women and/or children.
(Note: See Atrocities section for many other examples of the killing of innocents.)
EX 34:6, DT 7:9-10, TS 1:2 God is faithful and truthful. He does not lie.
NU 14:30 God breaks his promise.
EX 34:6, DT 7:9-10, TS 1:2 God is faithful and truthful. He does not lie.
1KI 22:21-23 God condones a spirit of deception.
EX 34:6, DT 7:9-10, TS 1:2 God is faithful and truthful. He does not lie.
2TH 2:11-12 God deludes people, making them believe what is false, so as to be able to condemn them. (Note: some versions use the word persuade here. The context makes clear, however, that deception is involved.)
EX 34:6-7, JS 24:19, 1CH 16:34 God is faithful, holy and good.
IS 45:6-7, LA 3:8, AM 3:6 God is responsible for evil.
EX 34:6-7, HE 9:27 God remembers sin, even when it has been forgiven.
JE 31:34 God does not remember sin when it has been forgiven.
LE 3:17 God himself prohibits forever the eating of blood and fat.
MT 15:11, CN 2:20-22 Jesus and Paul say that such rules don't matter--they are only human injunctions.
LE 19:18, MT 22:39 Love your neighbor [as much as] yourself.
1CO 10:24 Put your neighbor ahead of yourself.
LE 21:10 The chief priest is not to rend his clothes.
MT 26:65, MK 14:63 He does so during the trial of Jesus.
LE 25:37, PS 15:1, 5 It is wrong to lend money at interest.
MT 25:27, LK 19:23-27 It is wrong to lend money without interest.
NU 11:33 God inflicts sickness.
JB 2:7 Satan inflicts sickness.
NU 15:24-28 Sacrifices can, in at least some case, take away sin.
HE 10:11 They never take away sin.
NU 25:9 24,000 died in the plague.
1CO 10:8 23,000 died in the plague.
NU 30:2 God enjoins the making of vows (oaths).
MT 5:33-37 Jesus forbids doing so, saying that they arise from evil (or the Devil).
NU 33:38 Aaron died on Mt. Hor.
DT 10:6 Aaron died in Mosera.
NU 33:41-42 After Aaron's death, the Israelites journeyed from Mt. Hor, to Zalmonah, to Punon, etc.
DT 10:6-7 It was from Mosera, to Gudgodah, to Jotbath.
DT 6:15, 9:7-8, 29:20, 32:21 God is sometimes angry.
MT 5:22 Anger is a sin.
DT 7:9-10 God destroys his enemies.
MT 5:39-44 Do not resist your enemies. Love them.
DT 18:20-22 A false prophet is one whose words do not come true. Death is required.
EZ 14:9 A prophet who is deceived, is deceived by God himself. Death is still required.
DT 23:1 A castrate may not enter the assembly of the Lord.
IS 56:4-5 Some castrates will receive special rewards.
DT 23:1 A castrate may not enter the assembly of the Lord.
MT 19:12 Men are encouraged to consider making themselves castrates for the sake of the Kingdom of God.
DT 24:1-5 A man can divorce his wife simply because she displeases him and both he and his wife can remarry.
MK 10:2-12 Divorce is wrong, and to remarry is to commit adultery.
DT 24:16, 2KI 14:6, 2CH 25:4, EZ 18:20 Children are not to suffer for their parent's sins.
RO 5:12, 19, 1CO 15:22 Death is passed to all men by the sin of Adam.
DT 30:11-20 It is possible to keep the law.
RO 3:20-23 It is not possible to keep the law.
JS 11:20 God shows no mercy to some.
LK 6:36, JA 5:11 God is merciful.
JG 4:21 Sisera was sleeping when Jael killed him.
JG 5:25-27 Sisera was standing.
JS 10:38-40 Joshua himself captured Debir.
JG 1:11-15 It was Othniel, who thereby obtained the hand of Caleb's daughter, Achsah.
1SA 8:2-22 Samuel informs God as to what he has heard from others.
PR 15:3, JE 16:17, 23:24-25, HE 4:13 God is everywhere. He sees and hears everything.
1SA 9:15-17 The Lord tells Samuel that Saul has been chosen to lead the Israelites and will save them from the Philistines.
1SA 15:35 The Lord is sorry that he has chosen Saul.
1SA 31:4-7 Saul commits suicide and the Israelites are overrun by the Philistines.
1SA 15:7-8, 20 The Amalekites are utterly destroyed.
1SA 27:8-9 They are utterly destroyed (again?).
1SA 30:1, 17-18 They raid Ziklag and David smites them (again?).
1SA 16:10-11, 17:12 Jesse had seven sons plus David, or eight total.
1CH 2:13-15 He had seven total.
1SA 16:19-23 Saul knew David well before the latter's encounter with Goliath.
1SA 17:55-58 Saul did not know David at the time of his encounter with Goliath and had to ask about David's identity.
1SA 17:50 David killed Goliath with a slingshot.
1SA 17:51 David killed Goliath (again?) with a sword.
1SA 17:50 David killed Goliath.
2SA 21:19 Elhanan killed Goliath. (Note: Some translations insert the words "the brother of" before Elhanan. These are an addition to the earliest manuscripts in an apparent attempt to rectify this inconsistency.)
1SA 21:1-6 Ahimalech was high priest when David ate the bread.
MK 2:26 Abiathar was high priest at the time.
1SA 28:6 Saul inquired of the Lord, but received no answer.
1CH 10:13-14 Saul died for not inquiring of the Lord.
1SA 31:4-6 Saul killed himself by falling on his sword.
2SA 1:2-10 Saul, at his own request, was slain by an Amalekite.
2SA 21:12 Saul was killed by the Philistines on Gilboa.
1CH 10:13-14 Saul was slain by God.
2SA 6:23 Michal was childless.
2SA 21:8 (KJV) She had five sons.
2SA 24:1 The Lord inspired David to take the census.
1CH 21:1 Satan inspired the census.
2SA 24:9 The census count was: Israel 800,000 and Judah 500,000.
1CH 21:5 The census count was: Israel 1,100,000 and Judah 470,000.
2SA 24:10-17 David sinned in taking the census.
1KI 15:5 David's only sin (ever) was in regard to another matter.
2SA 24:24 David paid 50 shekels of silver for the purchase of a property.
1CH 21:22-25 He paid 600 shekels of gold.
1KI 3:12 God made Solomon the wisest man that ever lived, yet ....
1KI 11:1-13 Solomon loved many foreign women (against God's explicit prohibition) who turned him to other gods (for which he deserved death).
1KI 3:12, 4:29, 10:23-24, 2CH 9:22-23 God made Solomon the wisest king and the wisest man that ever lived. There never has been nor will be another like him.
MT 12:42, LK 11:31 Jesus says: "... now one greater than Solomon is here."
1KI 4:26 Solomon had 40,000 horses (or stalls for horses).
2CH 9:25 He had 4,000 horses (or stalls for horses).
1KI 5:16 Solomon had 3,300 supervisors.
2CH 2:2 He had 3,600 supervisors.
1KI 7:15-22 The two pillars were 18 cubits high.
2CH 3:15-17 They were 35 cubits high.
1KI 7:26 Solomon's "molten sea" held 2000 "baths" (1 bath = about 8 gallons).
2CH 4:5 It held 3000 "baths."
1KI 8:12, 2CH 6:1, PS 18:11 God dwells in thick darkness.
1TI 6:16 God dwells in unapproachable light.
1KI 8:13, AC 7:47 Solomon, whom God made the wisest man ever, built his temple as an abode for God.
AC 7:48-49 God does not dwell in temples built by men.
1KI 9:28 420 talents of gold were brought back from Ophir.
2CH 8:18 450 talents of gold were brought back from Ophir.
1KI 15:14 Asa did not remove the high places.
2CH 14:2-3 He did remove them.
1KI 16:6-8 Baasha died in the 26th year of King Asa's reign.
2CH 16:1 Baasha built a city in the 36th year of King Asa's reign.
1KI 16:23 Omri became king in the thirty-first year of Asa's reign and he reigned for a total of twelve years.
1KI 16:28-29 Omri died, and his son Ahab became king in the thirty- eighth year of Asa's reign. (Note: Thirty-one through thirty-eight equals a reign of seven or eight years.)
1KI 22:23, 2CH 18:22, 2TH 2:11 God himself causes a lying spirit.
PR 12:22 God abhors lying lips and delights in honesty.
1KI 22:42-43 Jehoshaphat did not remove the high places.
2CH 17:5-6 He did remove them.
2KI 2:11 Elijah went up to heaven.
JN 3:13 Only the Son of Man (Jesus) has ever ascended to heaven.
2CO 12:2-4 An unnamed man, known to Paul, went up to heaven and came back.
HE 11:5 Enoch was translated to heaven.
2KI 4:32-37 A dead child is raised (well before the time of Jesus).
MT 9:18-25, JN 11:38-44 Two dead persons are raised (by Jesus himself).
AC 26:23 Jesus was the first to rise from the dead.
2KI 8:25-26 Ahaziah was 22 years old when he began his reign.
2CH 22:2 He was 42 when he began his reign.
[Note: Some translations use "twenty-two" here in an attempt to rectify this discrepancy. The Hebrew is clear, however, that 2CH 22:2 is 42. The Hebrew words involved are Strong's H705 and H8147, "forty" and "two," respectively.]
2KI 9:27 Jehu shot Ahaziah near Ibleam. Ahaziah fled to Meggido and died there.
2CH 22:9 Ahaziah was found hiding in Samaria, brought to Jehu, and put to death.
2KI 16:5 The King of Syria and the son of the King of Israel did not conquer Ahaz.
2CH 28:5-6 They did conquer Ahaz.
2KI 24:8 Jehoiachin (Jehoiakim) was eighteen years old when he began to reign.
2CH 36:9 He was eight.
(Note: This discrepancy has been "corrected" in some versions.)
2KI 24:8 Jehoiachin (Jehoiakim) reigned three months.
2CH 36:9 He reigned three months and ten days.
2KI 24:17 Jehoiachin (Jehoaikim) was succeeded by his uncle.
2CH 36:10 He was succeeded by his brother.
1CH 3:11-13 The lineage is: Joram, Ahaziah, Joash, Amaziah, Azariah, Jotham.
MT 1:8-9 It is: Joram, Uzziah, Jotham, etc.
1CH 3:19 Pedaiah was the father of Zerubbabel.
ER 3:2 Shealtiel was the father of Zerubbabel.
2CH 19:7, AC 10:34, RO 2:11 There is no injustice or partiality with the Lord.
RO 9:15-18 God has mercy on (and hardens the hearts of) whom he pleases.
ER 2:3-64 (Gives the whole congregation as 42,360 while the actual sum of the numbers is about 30,000.)
JB 2:3-6, 21:7-13, 2TI 3:12 The godly are persecuted and chastised but the wicked grow old, wealthy, and powerful, unchastised by God.
PS 55:23, 92:12-14, PR 10:2-3, 27-31, 12:2, 21 The lives of the wicked are cut short. The righteous flourish and obtain favor from the Lord.
PS 10:1 God cannot be found in time of need. He is "far off."
PS 145:18 God is near to all who call upon him in truth.
PS 22:1-2 God sometimes forsakes his children. He does not answer.
PS 46:1 God is a refuge, a strength, a very present help.
PS 30:5, JE 3:12, MI 7:18 God's anger does not last forever.
JE 17:4, MT 25:46 It does last forever. (He has provided for eternal punishment.)
PS 58:10-11 The righteous shall rejoice when he sees vengeance.
PR 24:16-18 Do not rejoice when your enemy falls or stumbles.
PS 78:69, EC 1:4, 3:14 The earth was established forever.
PS 102:25-26, MT 24:35, MK 13:31, LK 21:33, HE 1:10-11, 2PE 3:10 The earth will someday perish.
PR 3:13, 4:7, 19:8, JA 1:5 Happy is the man who finds wisdom. Get wisdom.
LK 2:40, 52 Jesus was filled with wisdom and found favor with God.
1CO 1:19-25, 3:18-20 Wisdom is foolishness.
PR 12:2, RO 8:28 A good man obtains favor from the Lord.
2TI 3:12, HE 12:6 The godly will be persecuted.
PR 14:8 The wisdom of a prudent man is to discern his way.
MT 6:25-34 Take no thought for tomorrow. God will take care of you.
PR 14:15-18 The simple believe everything and acquire folly; the prudent look where they are going and are crowned with knowledge.
MT 18:3, LK 18:17 You must believe as little children do.
1CO 1:20, 27 God has made the wisdom of the world foolish so as to shame the wise.
PR 16:4 God made the wicked for the "day of evil."
MT 11:25, MK 4:11-12 God and Jesus hide some things from some people.
JN 6:65 No one can come to Jesus unless it is granted by God.
RO 8:28-30 Some are predestined to be called to God, believe in Jesus, and be justified.
RO 9:15-18 God has mercy on, and hardens the hearts of, whom he pleases.
2TH 2:11-12 God deceives the wicked so as to be able to condemn them.
1TI 2:3-4, 2PE 3:9 [Yet] God wants all to be saved.
PR 8:13, 16:6 It is the fear of God that keeps men from evil.
1JN 4:18 There is no fear in love. Perfect love drives out fear.
1JN 5:2, 2JN 1:6 Those who love God keep his commandments.
PR 26:4 Do not answer a fool. To do so makes you foolish too.
PR 26:5 Answer a fool. If you don't, he will think himself wise.
PR 30:5 Every word of God proves true.
JE 8:8 The scribes falsify the word of God.
JE 20:7, EZ 14:9, 2TH 2:11-12 God himself deceives people.
(Note: Some versions translate deceive as "persuade." The context makes clear, however, that deception is involved.)
IS 3:13 God stands to judge.
JL 3:12 He sits to judge.
IS 44:24 God created heaven and earth alone.
JN 1:1-3 Jesus took part in creation.
IS 53:9 Usually taken to be a prophecy re: Jesus, mentions burial with others.
MT 27:58-60, MK 15:45-46, LK 23:52-53, JN 19:38-42 Jesus was buried by himself.
JE 12:13 Some sow wheat but reap thorns.
MI 6:15 Some sow but won't reap anything.
MT 25:26, LK 19:22 Some reap without sowing.
2CO 9:6, GA 6:7 A man reaps what he sows.
JE 32:18 God shows love to thousands, but brings punishment for the sins of their fathers to many children.
2CO 13:11, 14, 1JN 4:8, 16 God is a god of love.
JE 34:4-5 Zedekiah was to die in peace.
JE 52:10-11 Instead, Zedekaih's sons are slain before his eyes, his eyes are then put out, he is bound in fetters, taken to Babylon and left in prison to die.
EZ 20:25-26 The law was not good. The sacrifice of children was for the purpose of horrifying the people so that they would know that God is Lord.
RO 7:12, 1TI 1:8 The law is good.
EZ 26:15-21 God says that Tyre will be destroyed and will never be found again.
(Nebudchanezzar failed to capture or destroy Tyre. It is still inhabited.)
DN 5:1 (Gives the title of "king" to Belshazzar although Belshazzar was actually the "viceroy.")
DN 5:2 (Says that Nebuchadnezzar was the father of Belshazzar, but actually, Nebonidus was the father of Belshazzar.) (Note: Some versions attempt to correct this error by making the verse say that Nebuchadnezzar was the grandfather of Belshazzar.)
ZE 11:12-13 Mentions "thirty pieces" and could possibly be thought to be connected with the Potter's Field prophesy referred to in Matthew.
MT 27:9 Jeremiah is given as the source of the prophesy regarding the purchase of the Potter's Field. (Note: There is no such prophesy in Jeremiah.)
MT 1:6-7 The lineage of Jesus is traced through David's son, Solomon.
LK 3:23-31 It is traced through David's son, Nathan.
(Note: Some apologists assert that Luke traces the lineage through Mary. That this is untrue is obvious from the context since Luke and Matthew both clearly state that Joseph was Jesus' father.)
MT 1:16 Jacob was Joseph's father.
LK 3:23 Heli was Joseph's father.
MT 1:17 There were twenty-eight generations from David to Jesus.
LK 3:23-38 There were forty-three.
MT 1:18-21 The Annunciation occurred after Mary had conceived Jesus.
LK 1:26-31 It occurred before conception.
MT 1:20 The angel spoke to Joseph.
LK 1:28 The angel spoke to Mary.
MT 1:20-23, LK 1:26-33 An angel announces to Joseph and/or Mary that the child (Jesus) will be "great," the "son of the Most High," etc., and ....
MT 3:13-17, MK 1:9-11 The baptism of Jesus is accompanied by the most extraordinary happenings, yet ....
MK 3:21 Jesus' own relatives (or friends) attempt to constrain him, thinking that he might be out of his mind, and ....
MK 6:4-6 Jesus says that a prophet is without honor in his own house (which certainly should not have been the case considering the Annunciation and the Baptism).
MT 1:23 He will be called Emmanuel (or Immanuel).
MT 1:25 Instead, he was called Jesus.
MT 2:13-16 Following the birth of Jesus, Joseph and Mary flee to Egypt, (where they stay until after Herod's death) in order to avoid the murder of their firstborn by Herod. Herod slaughters all male infants two years old and under. (Note: John the Baptist, Jesus' cousin, though under two is somehow spared without fleeing to Egypt.)
LK 2:22-40 Following the birth of Jesus, Joseph and Mary remain in the area of Jerusalem for the Presentation (about forty days) and then return to Nazareth without ever going to Egypt. There is no slaughter of the infants.
MT 2:23 "And he went and lived in a town called Nazareth. So was fulfilled what was said through the prophets: He will be called a Nazarene.'" (This prophecy is not found in the OT and while Jesus is often referred to as "Jesus of Nazareth", he is seldom referred to as "Jesus the Nazarene.")
MT 3:11-14, JN 1:31-34 John realized the true identity of Jesus (as the Messiah) either prior to the actual Baptism, or from the Baptism onward. The very purpose of John's baptism was to reveal Jesus to Israel.
MT 11:2-3 After the Baptism, John sends his disciples to ask if Jesus is the Messiah.
MT 3:12, 13:42 Hell is a furnace of fire (and must therefore be light).
MT 8:12, 22:13, 25:30 Hell is an "outer darkness" (and therefore dark).
MT 3:16, MK 1:10 It was Jesus who saw the Spirit descending.
JN 1:32 It was John who saw the Spirit descending.
MT 3:17 The heavenly voice addressed the crowd: "This is my beloved Son."
MK 1:11, LK 3:22 The voice addressed Jesus: "You are my beloved Son...."
MT 4:1-11, MK 1:12-13 Immediately following his Baptism, Jesus spent forty days in the wilderness resisting temptation by the Devil.
JN 2:1-11 Three days after the Baptism, Jesus was at the wedding in Cana.
MT 4:5-8 The Devil took Jesus to the pinnacle of the temple, then to the mountain top.
LK 4:5-9 First to the mountain top, then to the pinnacle of the temple.
MT 4:18-20, MK 1:16-18 (One story about choosing Peter as a disciple.)
LK 5:2-11 (A different story.)
JN 1:35-42 (Still another story.)
MT 5:1 - 7:29 Jesus delivers his most noteworthy sermon while on the mount.
LK 6:17-49 Jesus delivers his most noteworthy sermon while on the plain. (Note: No such sermons are mentioned in either MK or JN and Paul seems totally unfamiliar with either the sermon on the mount or the sermon on the plain.)
MT 5:16 Good works should be seen.
MT 6:1-4 They should be kept secret.
MT 5:17-19, LK 16:17 Jesus underscores the permanence of the law.
LE 10:8 - 11:47, DT 14:3-21 The law distinguishes between clean and unclean foods.
MK 7:14-15, MK 7:18-19 Jesus says that there is no such distinction.
1TI 4:1-4 All foods are clean according to Paul.
MT 5:17-19, LK 16:17 Jesus did not come to abolish the law.
EP 2:13-15, HE 7:18-19 Jesus did abolish the law.
MT 5:22 Anyone who calls another a fool is liable to Hell.
MT 7:26 Jesus says that anyone who hears his words and does not do them is a fool. (Note: The translation now prevalent, "like a foolish man," in MT 7:26 is a dishonest attempt to alleviate the obvious inconsistency here in that the oldest Greek manuscripts use the same Greek word translated "fool" in MT 5:22 and "like a foolish man" in MT 7:26.)
MT 23:17-19 Jesus twice calls the Pharisees blind fools.
MT 25:2, 3, 8 Jesus likens the maidens who took no oil to fools. (Note: This is the same Greek word translated "fool" in MT 5:22 and MT 23:17-19.)
1CO 1:23, 3:18, 4:10 Paul uses "fool" with regard to Christians becoming fools for Christ. (Note: Again, this is the same Greek word translated "fool" in MT 5:22 and MT 23:17-19.)
MT 5:22 Anger by itself is a sin.
EP 4:26 Anger is...
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#144 Posted : Saturday, August 29, 2009 11:23:29 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

It looks like the text got cut off in the above message. Here's Yada's response:


Quote:
Re: Interesting Quote‏
From: Prophet of Doom (email@prophetofdoom.net)
Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 5:39:18 AM
To: "JAM"

J,

Seven years ago I was confronted by a much more credible list called "101 Bible Contradictions" and I published a rebuttal, destroying the validity of the criticisms. I don't know if it is still available on the POD site, or misplaced somewhere in our archives. While nothing in their list was difficult to refute, doing so again would be a poor use of my time, especially since your list is ignorant in the extreme. Hopefully, you just copied and pasted it from a Muslim moron, and didn't actually produce it our read it. But either way, based upon sending it to me, your credibility was shot.

If you are interested in knowing what Yahweh's prophets wrote, I invite you to read www.YadaYahweh.com. There, you will find a 2000-page amplified translation of the oldest extant Hebrew and Greek manuscripts of the Old and Renewed Covenant, along with a commentary. It isn't, however, Christian, so I have "no faith to shake." I am anti-religious, as is God.

Sadly, your use of "hilarious" in this context, suggests that you aren't actually capable of processing the information contained in either Prophet of Doom or Yada Yahweh. But if I am wrong, my advice to you is to open your mind, not your mouth.

One of many reasons that I am critical of your letter is that, contrary to your claim, my credibility is irrelevant. Prophet of Doom's effectiveness at destroying the religion of Islam is based exclusively upon the thousands of citations of passages from the Islamic scriptures. It is based upon Muhammad's words and deeds, not mine. Moreover, if the Torah, Prophets, and "Gospels," were errant, then Allah, who claimed to have inspired them, would not be credible.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#145 Posted : Saturday, August 29, 2009 2:57:50 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 3:15 PM, "JAM" wrote:

Hello,

First of all, thank you for your response. Second, I disagree with you: Your credibility is relevant. You try to destroy Islam by finding islamic scripture that contradicts science or reason. On the other hand, you are praising a book, called the bible, that can never, I repeat, never be a book of an almighty force simply because it destroys itself from within. There are 700 inconsistencies in the bible (www.cs.umd.edu/~mvz/bible/bible-inconsistencies.pdf) and excuses are made by saying it is not essential or literal. How can a reasonable man believe in such a book. I will quote a verse that is pretty easy to understand and we do not need to be bible scholars to fully understand it.

Leviticus 20:21 : Whoever marries his brother's wife violates his brother's marriage and does an unclean thing. That man and woman will have no children.

How can a book of an almighty force have such a ridiculous verse? I want to see your excuse for this verse alone. If Jesus would come back to earth and say, yes the Bible is the word of god, I could not take him seriously. The sad truth is Jesus never wrote something into the bible or read the New Testament. And the saddest truth is, that even those, who wrote the New Testament have never seen Jesus or were present at his crucifixion. And you are praising this book by saying it's consistent when it's not. Your credibility is relevant for the credibility of prophetofdoom.net. By saying your credibility is irrelevant you have scored an own goal. You have tried to fool us by saying the bible tells a consistent story. And now you're trying to destroy islam by disproving them. But you have lied to me about the bible, how do I know you're not lying about islam. They have their own excuses for their verses. And I have read verses of both books (bible and koran) and due all respect, in terms of "brutality" the old testament makes the koran look like "alice in wonderland".

I'm sorry but when you are a member prophetofdoom.net, and you say you are not credible, how credible does that make prophetofdoom.net?


Yada's response:

Quote:
J,

In the future, you may want to actually read a book before you criticize it or its author. You continue to reveal your ignorance of Prophet of Doom and Yada Yahweh, of Muhammad's words and of those of God.

If you had read Prophet of Doom, you would have known that your opening claim is not true: "You try to destroy Islam by finding islamic scripture that contradicts science or reason." I completely destroyed the religion of Islam by presenting 80% of the relevant, non-repetitive statements from Muhammad in Prophet of Doom--many thousands of quotations from the Qur'an and Hadith, the Sira and Ta'rikh. Quotations were not selected just because they revealed that Muhammad and his god were irrational, immoral, inaccurate, contradictory, ruthless, or just stupid, but to tell their story as accurately, comprehensively, contextually, and chronologically as it can be exposed using the five oldest and most reliable Islamic sources.

Therefore, when it comes to Prophet of Doom, I'm irrelevant. The content of the five oldest Islamic sources is all that is relevant. Rather than wasting your time trying to know if I am trustworthy, you should have invested your time determining if the 1000-page book accurately and fairly conveyed what Muhammad said and did. And since I provide the documentation for every citation, and since I only used the most credible sources, that was made easy for you. But a word of warning: hundreds of Muslims have tried this approach, one far more rational than yours, and they have all failed to find a single misquotation or misrepresentation.

As it relates to Yahweh's Word, I suggest that you stop pretending that you understand it. If you want to know what God says, invest the time to read the 2000 pages of Yada Yahweh. Stop parroting the thoughtless rantings of other ignorant people. Invest the time; learn the truth, and think for yourself.

The translation you have provided for Leviticus 20.21 isn't accurate. The verse actually says: "An individual ('ysh) who relationally ('asher) graps hold of (laqah) his bother's ('ah) wife ('isah - female individual) is unclean and is cast aside (nadah - is corrupted and is cast out and excluded). Her unprotected vulnerability ('erwah - nakedness and indecentness, indecency and improper behavior) reveals (galah - makes known) His brother's ('ah) stripped ('aryry - naked and barren) existence (hayah)."

Yahweh uses the metaphor of family and marriage to demonstrate the nature of the Covenant relationship he wants us to enjoy with Him. His instructions in this regard are designed to reveal that those who are unfaithful, who don't respect the institution of marriage, and who metaphorically "sleep with false gods," are unclean, and thus are cast aside. They are unprotected by Yahweh's plan of salvation and thus are stripped of a continued existence with Him in the Promised Land.

Yahweh, unlike Allah, never calls the Renewed Covenant "Scripture." According to Yahweh, and thus to Yahshua (the human manifistation of Yah), the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms are Scripture. According to Yahweh, the TP&P are sufficient to know Yahweh and to trust Him.

Yahshua came to fulfill the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms, which is why there was no reason for Him to write anything more. The three eyewitness accounts Matthew, Mark (Mark is from Peter and scribed by Mark), and John simply confirm that He did what He said He would do--what the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms predicted He would do. The serve to help those who want to understand, better understand the Torah's promises, the Torah's plan of salvation.

If you actually knew and compared the relative percentage of, the purpose of, the actual nature of, and constraints placed upon the violent verses in the Qur'an and Old Covenant, you would know that there is no comparison. The opposite of what you claim is true. Not only aren't any of the OC's violent verses open ended in place or time, but instead limited to one very small place at one very small period of time, and for only one reason (completely unlike those found in the Qur'an), as a percentage of the total, and in relative scale and consequence, the OC's peaceful and moral to violent and immoral verse ratio differs from the Qur'an's by score of magnitudes.

Yahweh authorized violence at one time and place because He wanted to free His people from the oppression and beguilement of politics and religion. Allah wants his jihadists to enslave and deceive the world by way of his politicized religious scheme--one advanced by the sword.

Simply stated, the more you write, the more you demonstrate how little you know and how opinionated you are. I hope for you that you solve this problem before it is too late. Fortunately, the solution is in front of you. Unfortunately, based upon your last two letters, you'll continue to trust those who are not trustworthy, and not trust the One who is trustworthy.

J, while the sources you cite are Islamic, and while your criticisms and writing style is similar to that of Muslims, I don't know or care if you are a Muslim or an Atheist. But I do want you to know that the problems you have cited with regard to Yahweh's Word are either based upon errant translations or religious corruption. While it is fair game to judge Allah, the Qur'an, and Islam based upon Muhammad's words and deeds, it isn't reasonable or in your interest to judge Yahweh's Word based upon someone else's musings.

While I am irrelevant, and while Allah doesn't exist, Yahweh is worth knowing.

Yada

Edited by moderator Saturday, August 29, 2009 11:38:29 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#146 Posted : Saturday, November 7, 2009 2:54:33 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

"Praise"

Quote:
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 12:40 PM, "C" wrote:

I love this book, this website and Yada.

I cant say thank you enough. Fascinating. I live in England in a ' culturally diverse ' city suburb that has 20% Islamic proportion. The truth has been hidden for far to long i love reading this , its so so shocking ( the best word i can choose) this is fantastic and hilarious.

Many thanks.

I feel that i have to send an email becaus I just love the truth and reality of the content ( i have cross checked) .

God bless Yada !!! and p.o.d team

(p.s. seriously though , spreading this info could lead to bad things locally , thats how serious this book is ) wow . speechless at every turn. a big ty.

from -C ;)


Yada's response:

Quote:
Thank you "C". You are right in saying the the truth has been hidden for too long.

In that you "love the truth," when you have completed Prophet of Doom, I would encourage you to read Yada Yahweh. It is even more shocking.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#147 Posted : Saturday, November 7, 2009 3:03:04 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Re: Thank you for the information regarding the book sales.
Quote:

On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:18 AM, "PS" wrote:

Dear Yada - thank you very much for your reply regarding the sale of cd's, much appreciated::

If I might press on you and ask a question which I have been searching for the answer for a while now, if would be so kind as to humor me.

The question is in regards to Genesis, particularily Chap.1 as well as chap.2... I dont dispute any word in it but in chap 1 (King James) verse 26-28 , God makes man 'So God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He, him, male and female created he them.' Ok, simple enough.

But when you get to Chap.2 verse 18 that is were God says 'It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.' So then God makes a woman ( I am thankful for that everdyay), out of Adam's side.

Is it that Chap.2 is just an expanded explanation of Chap 1 making chap 1 an opening summary of what was important for the opening? or, did God make 2 sets of a man and a woman? I always read things as though that is the order they happened in.

God, creates in a logical order all the things of the earth, then creates a man and a woman according to chapter 1:: then in chap 2 we find Adam without Eve and God making for him a helper.

Am I missing something here?

I really dont expect an answer and I no for sure there is a logical linguistic explanation for it, anyway thank you very much for your kindness in answering my previous query.

Have a nice day, God Bless You and Continue with you accoding to His purpose.

-P


Yada's response:

Quote:
P,

Genesis one is told from Yahweh's perspective where the creation of man is set into the context of universal creation--which makes us insignificant. And chapter two, which is told from Adam's perspective, reveals the purpose of creation, which makes man significant.

The primary message that most Christians miss is the reference to male and female and God's identity. For a better understanding of this, a far more profound truth, I invite you to throw away your KJV and consider Yada Yahweh. It's free at www.YadaYahweh.com.

Should you be interested, I wrote a revealing article on the history of the KJV in the context of the Romans verse which allegedly asks us to submit to governmental authority. I'd be happy to send it you you as an attachment.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline bitnet  
#148 Posted : Sunday, November 8, 2009 5:01:04 AM(UTC)
bitnet
Joined: 7/3/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,120

Shalom,

Just a quick note to inform you guys that I compiled all the YY books and radio shows into a DVD and made some copies for distribution. I helped a brother in Yahushua with such as DVD and he duplicated it at a shop -- 50 pcs -- for distribution to the people at his/our former church. He gave our most of it when he attended the FoT recently. Unfortunately, we have not received one call yet. We are not fretting about this as it is Abba Yahweh who does the calling. All we are doing is to try to share His Word with those around us so that we cannot be accused of keeping it all to ourselves. We will continue to produce these DVDs and distribute it for free. I'm going to design a CD jacket as soon as I can get the other work out of the way. May I use the YY logo, please? I'll try not to make it too tacky. ;-)
The reverence of Yahweh is the beginning of Wisdom.
Offline Yada  
#149 Posted : Saturday, November 14, 2009 3:10:40 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:07 AM, "MD" wrote:

Just wanted to congratulate you on such a great site with some very insightful stuff. I am surprised I have never seen the site before, well I don't really search for a lot of religious sites especially anything to do with muslims as their religion disgusts me.

I have always been of the opinion that their religion was, in its nature, evil and thanks to your translations from five different books my thoughts have proven to be correct. I only browsed through a bit of your free online book, particularly the section about their "prophet" taking advantage of the young Aisha and married her and then, well we know what he did the sick bastard. I look forward to reading more of your book.

Just thought I would say that your feedback section is great. I now know that it is also a prerequisite in Islam to speak in text speak "u" "u'll" "ur" "lol". Also that they still say that their religion preaches peace but wish death upon you in another sentence.

Keep up the good work, don't let the bastards change you in any way.


Yada's response:

Quote:
MD,

Thanks for reading portions of Prophet of Doom, and for sharing your thoughts with me. Muhammad was indeed a very sick fellow. Trusting a pedophile and pirate with one's soul is insane.

If you like insightful stuff, but are uncomfortable with religion, as am I, I would encourage you to read Yada Yahweh--a free link from the POD homepage. Islam isn't the only rotten religion.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#150 Posted : Wednesday, August 18, 2010 4:53:13 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

The following is an exchange between Yada and "NJ":

Quote:
Dear Ignorant, Irrational, and Unthinking Muslim ("NJ"),


On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:01 PM, "NJ" wrote:



Lie lie lie like you said you selected what you want and out of context.


There are over 5000 documented quotes in Prophet of Doom's 1000 pages, all from Islam's 5 oldest and most credible sources. As such, it is the opposite of "selecting what I wanted." Further, Prophet of Doom is the most "contextual" presentation of Islam's earliest sources ever written. It uses Ishaq's Sira/Biography, Tabari's Tarikh/History, and Bukhari's and Muslim's Hadith/Oral Reports to order the Qur'an chronologically and then set it into the context of Muhammad's repulsive life. So the opposite of what you claim is true.

Moreover, the Qur'an itself is almost completely devoid of all three forms of context (chronological, topical, and conversational), so if "selecting quotes out of context" diminishes their value, then the Qur'an itself is a completely worthless text. If you were an informed rational person, this realization alone would be sufficient for you to abandon Muhammad, Allah, and their oppressive religion of submission.

The problem is that you and your religion "lie, lie, lie."




If you want to sell your book find something better to write about instead saying things that you know not.


Based upon the fact that there are three lies in your opening sentence, and another two here, I obviously know far more about Muhammad, Allah, the Qur'an, and Islam's conception than you do. Further, everything is "better to write about instead" of Islam, so that is useless advice. There has never been a more foolish, oppressive, errant, or repulsive religion--not in all of human history. And I don't "sell the book," something you would have known if you had been smart enough to actually read it before you made a complete fool of yourself.



But at the same if you want evident of weather the Quran is the word of God or not that's up to you but you believe in what you believe and so let people believe in what they wanted to believe.


I can only assume that you meant "evidence," not "evident, and "whether," not "weather." But either way, if you had read Prophet of Doom you would have known that I already have presented far more than sufficient evidence from the Qur'an to prove beyond any doubt that it is the opposite of "the word of God." It isn't a matter of "belief," but instead evidence and reason.

My life would have been easier had I not cared enough about the fate of Muslims to reveal the truth about Muhammad, Allah, Islam, and the Qur'an. But I obviously care more about your soul than you do. Compassion compels those who are informed, and who understand to expose and condemn deceitful, destructive, and deadly dogmas like Islam. But now that I have done my job, you are free to ignore the evidence and "believe whatever you want to believe."



Cause as there is a drive for NWO and the science to replace God but remember God has always been and will always be.


At least you got something right, albeit an unrelated comment within the context of your argument. There is a NWO, but they will use religions like Islam and Christianity to dupe the masses into believing them. And while they are in competition with God (whose name is Yahuweh), they are working with and for Allah (whose actual name is Halal ben Shachar, aka Satan).

God has always been and will always be, but He is Yahuweh, not Allah. If you'd like to meet Yahuweh, you are invited to read www.YadaYahweh.com. He is the God Allah wants to be Greater than: "Allahu Akbar."



Have you thought of your creation or your life and death. I guess not.


Alas, you have fallen back into ignorance. I have written an entire book based upon Yahweh's creation testimony (http://yadayahweh.com/Yada_Yahweh_Genesis.YHWH). And the second, third, and fourth volumes of that 2500 page tome reveals what God has to say about life and death. Further, the "Would You Believe" chapter of Prophet of Doom (http://prophetofdoom.net/Prophet_of_Doom_01_Would_You_Believe.Islam) focuses on Muhammad's/Allah's hilariously false creation accounts. And the every chapter beginning with "The Pedophile Prophet/Profit" (http://prophetofdoom.net/Prophet_of_Doom_13_The_Pedophile_Pirate.Islam) deal with "life and death" Islamic style (aka "terrorism").

But let science tell me what will happened to you and me after we are dead and so on. Hope I have not cross the line here all the best


Science does explain what will happen to your body after your death, as well as mine. They will decompose.

Yahuweh explains what will happen to your soul after your death as well as mine. According to God, should you stop promoting Islam and simply remain its victim, your soul will cease to exist when you die. But if you continue to promote this religious lie, you will spend you eternity in the Abyss with Allah and Muhammad.

As for my soul, it will endure forever as part of Yahweh's family. That has nothing to do with me. It's God's gift. It's one He'd give you too if you changed your perspective, attitude, thinking, and walked away from your religion and then came to know, trust, and rely upon Yahuweh based upon His revelation in the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Users browsing this topic
8 Pages<12345>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.