Hi POD

I have a quick question.. It's about Aisha (again!!! can't get over the fact that Mohammad married a 6 yr old).. what I understood from reading elswhere, he claims that God wanted him to marry Aisa, did I understand correctly?

People on facebook are talking about the USA donating 20 milliion dollars to the Islamist party.. Many Tunisians are worried about this party winning the elections since the USA is backing them. All these lives and money wasted on these so called war on terror does not make sense any more. Why financing and supporting these same people they are at war with?

Pffff, well, I lost all hopes for democacy, the Islamic movement is winning, I will feel sorry for the young men who will be forced to blow up themselves in the name of GOD... I will feel sorry for the young little girls who will be raped by these old ugly men!!!!! Yep, very bright future awaiting my country... Lucky for me I have another country.

It's good to hear from you again, Miss M. I'm glad that you are well.

Regarding "God" and Muhammad, the first thing an informed and rational person comes to realize when the Qur'an is set into the context of Muhammad's life using the Hadith, is that Muhammad was Allah. So, yes, Allah/Muhammad told Muhammad to take Aisha. I cover this in the Pedophile Profit chapter of Prophet of Doom.

The simple and yet sad truth is that the USA is on the wrong side of most every conflict. That is especially so with regard to Islam.

The war against terror is a myth. One cannot fight a war against a tactic. And yes, you are correct, the fundamentalist Muslims America claims to be fighting in the guise of al-Qaeda, the nation is funding in Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Libya, Pakistan, Iraq, and Iran. I wish more people recognized what you now understand, but even though I've done nearly 2000 hours of talk radio programs and written a number of irrefutable books on the topic, I am unable to awaken them.

Hopefully you will go to your other country ASAP. In the nations corrupted by Islam women will be raped. They will only serve as factories to manufacture future suicide bombers.

POD

Dear E,

Before we consider your most resent responses, let's review our prior conversation. Initially, revealing what Islam has done to your mind, heart, and soul, you foolishly wrote:




To which we replied:

"U" lack what you accuse others of, but that is a normal situation for those poisoned by religion, especially one as moronic and immoral as Islam. If you had bothered to educate yourself, you would not only know that the author of Prophet of Doom is opposed to all religions, so he is not "insecure with his own."

Moreover, if you had read the Feedback section of the site, you would have realized that exposing and condemning Islam based upon its scriptures, god, and prophet is courageous.

Also, since you mentioned "truly disgusting," let's be honest: according to the Islamic scriptures Muhammad was a rapist, pedophile, thief, mass murderer, kidnapper, slave trader, liar, and terrorist, so he was the most truly disgusting men whoever lived.

And as for "making shit up," if you had actually read the book, you would have known that Prophet of Doom is the best documented, most comprehensive, chronological, and contextual presentation of the "shit" Muhammad perpetrated, and the "shit" Muhammad said, as this "shit" was conveyed to us through Islam's five oldest and most reputable sources - the Qur'an, Sira', Tarikh, and Hadith. Therefore, if the 5000 citations from these Islamic sources represent "making shit up," then your religion is based entirely on "shit."

But besides getting everything wrong, it was nice to hear from you, E. Women who defend Islam are especially ignorant, immoral, and irrational. You demonstrate the caustic nature of your religion, and thereby prove the point made in Prophet of Doom--a book you didn't bother to read before criticizing.


And now demonstrating that your religion has made you both immoral and also impervious to evidence and reason, it's hard not to notice that you didn't apologize for any of the six misstatements you make in your initial letter, nor did you refute any of the facts we laid before you, but instead, acting like a childish nincompoop, you have responded by insisting...




And yet, E, the one thousand pages of Prophet of Doom prove beyond any doubt that we are vastly better educated about Islam than you are. You haven't made a single valid point, and the book presents and documents many thousands of them--none of which you have even attempted to refute. It also proves beyond any doubt that Islam is an ugly, immoral, violent, and repressive religion based entirely upon the "dirty things that went through [Muhammad's] filthy head." It is "nonsense."

In fact, Prophet of Doom proves beyond any doubt that Islam is both culturally and personally counterproductive as well as being false internally, historically, scientifically, scripturally, linguistically, theologically, and morally. So if it were not so sad, it would be "laughable."

If you had actually read the book, or any of the Islamic sources it was based upon, you would have realized that Muhammad, by his own admission, was demon possessed--and therefore, he like all Muslims " has been poisoned by the devil." And speaking of "burning in hell fire," I don't suppose you have ever wondered why Allah is consistently depicted in hell torturing his victims? Have you ever wondered why the Islamic heaven is a brothel filled with perpetual virgins to be conquered, or that one gets in by killing?

The epitome of "making yourself look so uneducated and stupid" is criticizing a book you have not read, and then consistently conveying things which are not true. And yet this is what you have done.

"Uneducated and stupid" people slander those with whom they disagree instead of refuting what they have written. And they concoct straw men. We are irrelevant to this argument. Prophet of Doom is about Muhammad. And we are neither confused nor do we have any beliefs. Further, the only one we are accusing is Muhammad--and even then, we expose and condemn him using his own words and deeds as they were recorded by the first Muslims.

As such, the joke is on you, E. So the only question is whether or not you will ever be able to face the truth, consider the evidence, or deal with the resulting reality rationally. Laughing will not help, especially when someone says that "nothing you say will have an affect on me." And that sadly, is the consequence of religion. You have elected to become impervious to evidence and reason. As such, we don't pity you because you not only have chosen this fate, you have ignored, even rejected and demeaned, this opportunity to save you from Islam / Submission. You are even belligerent and mean-spirited about it.


Then, in your parting shot, you hypocritically opined...





Everything you continue to write, E, is the opposite of what is true. That says a great deal about you and your religion.

After all, lying is approved in Islam. And indeed, your wannabe God lied to you through his wannabe prophet. They even admitted doing so in their Qur'an.

And yet the evidence demonstrates that Allah is the most immoral spirit ever created and Muhammad was the most ignorant and immoral man who ever lived. So speaking of "poisoned," how is it that you trust a spirit who spends his time in hell torturing souls and a man who was a rapist, a pedophile, a sexual pervert, an adulterer, incestuous, a thief, a slave trader, a kidnapper, an acknowledged liar, a mass murderer, and ruthless terrorist? That sounds like a "filthy" shame to me, a scheme "belonging to the devil."

As for being "racist," the Qur'an is more anti-Semitic than Hitler's Mein Kampf. That's rather hard to explain since Allah claims to have authored the Torah, a book written about the Children of Yisra'el and the everlasting Covenant Relationship established between them and Yahowah. And while it is surely beyond your comprehension, the fact that the Torah and Qur'an are complete opposites, proves conclusively and irrefutably that Islam is a complete lie because Allah repeatedly says that his Qur'an confirms the Torah. If only you could process this single rational argument, you would forsake Islam.

We truly wish Muslims weren't so "damn ignorant." We truly wish that they didn't "belong with the devil." We truly wish that their "souls were not poisoned." But more than this, to demonstrate that we care more about your soul than you do, we have compiled Prophet of Doom (free, beginning at: http://prophetofdoom.net...uhammads_Own_Words.Islam) to free you from Islam.

Care enough about your own soul to read the book, E, and then write us again.

Dear Yada,

Hey there, my name is Matthew Carson, and Islam has troubled me for a very long time, now. To make a long story short, I finally snapped when I heard about the "(victory?) mosque" the Muslims intended to build near Ground Zero, and I needed knowledge. I can't tell you how happy I am to have found your audio book Prophet of Doom (I've probably listened to it all the way through, four times now), and how grateful I am for all of your exhaustive work compiling the necessary Qur'an and Hadith to form a consistent picture of early Islam to match today's terrorism. I've learned nearly everything I know about Islam from you (my other sources include thereligionofpeace.com, quran.com, general Muslim activity as reported on the world news, and Irvine Baxter's radio show "Politics and Religion"), and whenever I can, I reference your book to anyone I come in contact with when the subject of Islam comes up. A true journalist, you are eloquent in speech, interesting to listen to, and fair in your judgment calls. In a balanced world, the entire American nation would have a three-week mass media event, in which we would all hear "Prophet of Doom" every night after work, in two-hour segments. Hey, we can dream, can't we?
If you ever have some down time- which I know must be rare for a busy man like yourself- I'd like you to enjoy some of the fruits of your labor, and not just the bees and wasps they attract. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, so I hope that I have done a worthy job of imitating you in a project I've undertaken and completed.
http://youtu.be/M7f6ZHXuth8
In 2004, about three years after 9/11, RichCrest Animation Corporation and Badr Internation made a propaganda film called "Muhammad: The Last Prophet," in which they did their best to brainwash American children into thinking Islam was sweet and innocent. I took the liberty of adding commentary and Islamic scripture where applicable. Knowing you as I do now, you ought to get a kick out of it. Of course, if life is too hectic right now, I understand. I really just want to thank you for doing what so many of us are too scared (or simply too tiny) to do: telling the truth. One last thing: thank you for redirecting your audience towards the TRUE god, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob: Yahweh. It's plain to see why you yourself are so blessed.

Most sincerely,
Matthew Carson

Matthew,

This is very, very, well done. You are the voice of knowledge and reason in a land of ignorance and deception. And if anything, you are somewhat soft of the lies in the film, which is much more effective than I would have been. I enjoyed it.

You do not need to mention my name, however, because Prophet of Doom is not about me, but instead is nothing more than the best documented and most comprehensive presentation of Islam's five oldest sources. Better to describe what it represents than to list my name.

Yada

I was enjoying Prophet of Doom, until I started checking references. In chapter 8, you were citing Tabari/Ishaq with page numbers. I don't have a copy of Tabari, I haven't been able to find an electronic copy on the net. I do have SiraIshaq. Ishaq simply does not say what you say it says, as I understand your notation.

Here is what you say (please pardon the bold, underlining, italics and asterisks because it is my only way of marking text so I can find it again to use it):
Prince Charming says: Ishaq:323 "I am the best of plotters. I deceived them with My guile so that I delivered you from them." Webster defines "guile" the way the Bible defines Satan: "insidious and cunning, a crafty or artful deception, duplicity." ***
Here is what Ishaq:323 says in my copy (I am including 322, 323 and 324, so you can see it is no typo):
Jabal and Shamwil came to the apostle and said: 'Tell us when the hour will be if you are a prophet as you say.' So God sent down concerning them: 'They will ask you about the hour when it will come to pass. Say, only my Lord knows of it. None but He will reveal it at its proper time. It is heavy in the heavens and the earth. Suddenly will it come upon you. They will ask you as though you knew about it. Say Only God knows about it, but most men do not know'3 (322).
Sallam and Nu'man b. Aufa and Mahmud b. Dihya and Sha's and Malik came and said to him: 'How can we follow you when you have abandoned our Qibla and you do not allege that 'Uzayr is the son of God?' So God sent down concerning these words: 'The Jews say that 'Uzayr is the son of God and the Christians say the Messiah is the son of God. That is what they say with their mouths copying the speech of those who disbelieved aforetime. God fight them! How perverse they are' to the end of the passage4 (323).
Mahmud b. Sayhan and Nu'man b. Ada' and Bahri and 'Uzayr and Sallam came to him and said: 'Is it true, Muhammad, that what you have brought is the truth from God? For our part we cannot see that it is arranged as the Torah is.' He answered, 'You know quite well that it is from God; you will find it written in the Torah which you have. If men and jinn came together to produce its like they could not.' Finhas and 'Abdullah b. Suriya and Ibn Saluba and Kinana b. al Rabi' and Ashya' and Ka'b b. al-Asad and Shamwil and Jabal were there and they said: 'Did neither men nor jinn tell you this, Muhammad?' He said : 'You know well that it is from God and that I am the apostle of God. You will find it written in the Torah you have.' They said: 'When God sends an apostle He does for him what he wishes, so bring down a book to us from heaven that we may read it and know what it is, otherwise we will produce one like the one you bring.' So God sent down concerning their words: 'Say, Though men and jinn should meet to produce the like of this Quran they would not produce its like though one helped the other'1(324).

Can you please explain how to find the line you are using from SiraIshaq? I would love for what you are saying to be true, and would gleefully use it (I was ready to in a national newspaper comment, but I checked first and couldn't find what you said.

BTW the boxed number of 323 doesn't have the number either.

D

My citations from Ishaq are all from The Life of Muhammad - A translation of Ibn Ishaq's Sirat Rasul Allah. The translator is A. Guillaume. The publisher is Oxford University Press in Karachi. It was first published in 1955. The specific book I used for my citations was reprinted in Pakistan in 1967 and was specifically from the Seventh Impression in 1982. This translation, which includes lost citations which were later found in Tabari, was not available online when I wrote POD. In fact, when I found things online that purported to be the Sira, they were markedly different. Similarly, because of the differences, changing nature, and availability of online sources, I used printed versions of Tabari and Bukhari, and have listed the specifics of those publications in the book.

Yada

Thanks for the courtesy of your reply. I searched the copy of SiraIshaq I had and didn't find the words you quoted. I got online and found the book you mentioned, only a later version, for $21 plus shipping. It is on its way. I hope the numbering will basically be what you have.

What volumes of Al Tabari should I order to get the hadith you were using in chapter 8? I can't afford many volumes. The index to Al Tabari is $40, so I hope to pick your brain instead. As bad as they are, I'm not interested in the Islam creation myths. I'm just interested in ahadith from the time Muhammad's life.

I go to church with the survivors of Sharia Law when it was imposed on Sudan. I believe what you are saying about Islam. Westerners think decimation is a bad thing, killing one out of ten. One of my friends has 3 members of his extended family still alive, and he started with 30. Islam goes for I don't know what the word would be for 1 survivor out of every 10. Asking for sources is not disbelief; I just want primary sources to cite so that when others say that isn't so, I can say go to (name the Islamic holy book) and look at page so and so.

D

DA,

I wrote POD many years ago, so I no longer have that information in my head, but I believe that in the Letter to the Reader (http://prophetofdoom.net/Prophet_of_Doom_Letter_to_the_Reader.Islam) and in the Bibliography (http://prophetofdoom.net/Prophet_of_Doom_Bibliography.Islam) that I listed the most important volumes of Tabari. If I recall, volumes 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, and 9 (I think I also have 3-5 and 10-13 but that they cover an earlier and later period) are the most essential. But the best review of the Source material is found in Sources (http://prophetofdoom.net/Prophet_of_Doom_Appendix_Islams_Dark_Past.Islam). And if you are only interested in Hadith from Muhammad's time, then you can get by with Vs 6-9 of Tabari.

I mentioned several times in the book, that to make the book readable, that I removed extraneous material from hadith, and that I blended the versions of the same hadith found in more than one source, like in the Sira, Tarikh, Bukhari, and Muslim, into one narrative, just as I blended the five most popular Qur'an translations into one. If you haven't found it yet, we publish the five Qur'an's used in the book on the site at (http://prophetofdoom.net/Qurans.Islam). Using that tool will save you some money.

Also, be aware that online translations have been softened and changed over the past decade. And also, since paleo Arabic requires lots of interpreting and guessing to translate, there are wildly different renderings of the same verse and hadith citation.

I devote my time to www.YadaYah.com and to my new book, An Introduction to God, so when it comes to Islam, I'm not nearly as active as I once was. After writing POD, which was the result of 10,000 hours of research, and after answering thousands of emails regarding it, and doing 2500 hours of radio interviews on it, I came to realize that it was more than sufficient to awaken those with an open mind.

Since you mention the "church," I was once a Christian, but am not one any longer, having chosen the Covenant relationship over the religion. If you are interested in why I made this choice, I'll send you a copy of the current draft of An Introduction to God which covers the seven most important topics to Yahowah.

I wrote a lot about the Sudan in the Islamic Terrorism Timeline. But it is one thing to study what happened there and another to live though it. The Muslim leadership killed over 3 million animists and Christians over 25 years. It is the worst genocide since the holocaust. And it was all caused by Islam. So I concur with your motivation.

The world needs people who can cite the Islamic sources chapter and verse to go on talk radio programs. I did it for six or seven years, beginning in the fall of 2001. I hope you do the same. There are only a handful of people doing this today.

While I'm no longer on the top of my game regarding Islam, since I support your mission, I'll do my best to help you prepare yourself to engage in this battle.

Yada

Hello Yada,

I'm trusting all's going well with you and yours'.

Still enjoying your daily BTR program; and your monthly KGAB program.

As I'm working to thoroughly familiarize myself with the Fall Feasts coming up latter part of this month, I was reading that part of Yom Kippurym chapter in which you show Muslims promoting the name 'allah' as being God, and how it'd make a good moniker (to the point 'allah's' name in arabic being the 'mark')....so I take it that that would mean that all Muslims are not destroyed during Gog Magog? I know previously as a christian there's that tendency in me to read into things that's not there - my reading and seeing all Muslims as being destroyed in Gog Magog would be just such a thing I'd be guilty of doing here.



It would seem they are pushing Shariah law here in US under PC (Muslims being given a pass on virtually everything, while other religons take a back seat, just some of the proof I see unfolding to tell me: Islam's being foisted on the West/world just as the same entities are now pushing Gog Magog via office of the President and Congress, news media and movies, the State Department and CIA operations in and as it relates to the middle-east); and that with the right PR spin that anyone, including the Bushes and Obamas, can easily get elected, and by big percentage points even, so can definitely see a huge explosion in Islam around the world over the next 12 to 15 years prior to Tarowah, and would consider that as just one of the reasons not all Muslims are destroyed at the time of Gog Magog.



Yah's continued best on you, YY, ITG, and Yah's family,

V

Thanks for the affirmation Yada,

I'll keep shamaring Yah's Towrah...

Thanks again to the efforts of you, YY, the forums, BTR (and most importantly: Yah's T,P,P) I've gone from being a zealot pagan christian believing everything about the christian view on this world, to now: being totally rejecting of anything remotely related to christianity embracing Yahowah where He has always existed: His Towrah (and the accompanying Prophets and Writings that all point us back to the Towrah).



I can clearly see now that the New Testament is where satan has setup his throne within the entire christian bible - and the bibles being corrupted to elevate and promote Paul's letters to the exclusion of all else.



Was just thinking the other day about the Gideon group of business folks who send out their Gideon NT biblos, with their corrupted Psalms and Proverbs (to prisoners and military personnel)...so clearly the christians would prefer their New Testaments if going into the lion's den; those celebrating Towrah and know that's where Yah lives, would be happy having copy of Dabarym/Deut., if not the books of Moseh and Yahowsha'/Joshua, to go and face the same lion's den...one being light, life, God, the one path - the other being a counterfiet making Ma'aseyah Yahowsha' say things He never said and/or intended, having Him doing things for reasons that were not so: building a church and producing lots of christians indicative of bunny having lots of colorful eggs, I suppose...



Yah's best; and thanks for your reply,

V

What is the seven-step plan of salvation? I've never heard of seven steps. I'm a Seventh Day Adventist, and I believe in honoring God's Ten Commandments including the seventh day Sabbath. We also believe that there are three steps to salvation. The first is justification, next comes sanctification, and the last is glorification. All three of these are done by and through the workings of the Holy Spirit. Anyway, I'm interested in hearing about your . . . Faith. I hesitated using the word religion. :D



Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.
(John 16:13)

J

I have no faith. Belief is irrelevant when Yahowah can be known. Let evidence and reason be your guide through the Towrah.

I find telling, J, that like all Christians, you asked about the plan of salvation rather than the Covenant relationship. It is the wrong way of looking at things. Why would God want to save someone, and have them live with Him, when they haven't even bothered to get to know Him?

There are five terms and conditions of the Covenant you must accept, the first of which requires you to walk away from your religion, politics, and customs. If you are willing to do that, then in the third of these requirements, God invites you to walk to Him and become perfect. You do that by observing Passover, Unleavened Bread, FirstFruits, Seven Sabbaths, Trumpets, Reconciliations, and Shelters. The first makes you immortal. The second perfect. The third reborn into Yahowah's Family.

Yahowah's Word, Name, Towrah/Teaching, Covenant/Relationship, Invitations to Meet, and Instructions are presented in the Introduction to God, which is attached. While it is not yet finished, it is more than sufficient to answer your questions.

There are ten statements, of which seven are instructions, not ten commandments. And I can assure you based upon your letters and religion that you don't understand, much less honor, the first five. But, if you read the attached book, you will at least know what Yahowah wrote on those tablets. While meeting on the Shabat is better than meeting on Sunday, knowing what the Shabat represents is key to observing it and benefiting from it.

The Spirit is Set-Apart, not Holy. And She is our Spiritual Mother and represents the maternal nature of God. She does not justify. Yahowah is responsible for accomplishing that. There is no sanctification. As for glorification, Yahowah promises to empower and enrich us through the Covenant.

The Covenant has not yet been renewed, so there can be no Christian "New Testament." And most everything Paul wrote is wrong because it contradicts Yahowah's eternal testimony. The only portions of the Greek text which are even remotely reliable are Yahowsha's words in Mattanyahu, Yahowchanan, and Revelation. And even with them, they were not spoken in Greek and the text has been massively corrupted. Proof of all of these things is provided in the attached book, and the evidence is irrefutable.

As for your quote, it was true as it was spoken in Hebrew and Aramaic, and before it was corrupted, but only then when viewed from the proper perspective. The Set-Apart Spirit does not operate in a vacuum, nor did Yahowsha'. She and He help us understand the Towrah, which is where the truth is found--past, present, and future. Towrah, after all, means "Guidance" and Yahowah's Word is the Truth. And that is why Yahowah told you and me many hundreds of times to listen to and observe His Towrah. Yahowsha' said the same thing.

Yada

there are mother fuckers and there are son of mother fuckers..................but all are JEWS.

Which class you are ?????????????? pig born or Dog born...............

I thank Yahowah that I am not a Muslim. Just look at how filthy and foolish, ignorant, irrational, and immoral Muhammad and his pal Allah have made you. No moral person would write such a response.

As for my race, I'd love to be naturally born into God's family, and thus be a Yahuwdym, but alas, I'm Souix and had to be adopted into the Covenant. But thankfully with God, it makes no difference in the end because all that matters is the Towrah.

Yada

Hi, Yada

Tarek Fatah, a Muslim and one of the "world's foremost critics of Islamic extremism," they say.

Have you heard of this so-called "world's foremost critics of Islamic extremism"? He is often in the media (even in Norway).

To me he seems creepy because he claims that the killing of the Banu Qurayza Jews is a fictional story:
T Fatah: Muslim Hatred of Jews -1/2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BULJk3trq10

What do you think of these "Muslims" like Tarek Fatah? And how should we deal with these strange Muslims?
I do not understand why he (they) are still Muslims when they live in a free country where they can read and see for themselves... does he / they do this on purpose to trick us?

Are they not just useful idiots for the real Muslims and naive politicians?
"Tarek Fatah: PM Harper is right about islamofascism"
http://www.youtube.com/w...feature=player_embedded#!

P

So, TF is "a Muslim" who believes that the Qur'an's depiction of the "killing of the Banu Qurayza is fictional." That is irrational. You can't debate an irrational person. All that you can do is say that their premise is in direct conflict with the evidence and is internally contradictory. And that means that TF is a hypocrite who is sharing his personal, and unfounded, opinion.

Yada

Oh you who are arrogant & spread lies about Islam:
Islam is not a new Religion.
All Holy 124000 Holy Prophets from Holy Adam through Holy Abraham, Holy Moses, Holy Jesus & Holy Prophet Mohammed brought unified message:Glorify ALMIGHTY GOD the creator of the vast universe!
Prostrate before none but HIM alone. He is all alone, HE has no partner.
Read the gospel of ST Barnabas to know the truth.
Holy Quran is the Holy words of ALMIGHTY GOD.
Read about the Scientific information contain in the holy Quran & follow the right path.
Holy Prophet is the mercy to mankind.
Thank You,
B,Ahmed

A merciful rapist?
A merciful pedophile?
A merciful terrorist?
A merciful slave trader?
A merciful mass murderer?

I don't think so.

And speaking of thinking, since Prophet of Doom is based entirely on Muhammad's own words and deeds as they are reported in Islam's five oldest sources, how can a book which presents what he said and did "spread lies about Islam?" If these sources are untrue, doesn't that make Islam a lie?

Moreover, neither Adam nor Abraham were prophets, Moses' message in the Torah is the exact opposite of Muhammad's Qur'an, and the Qur'an's Issa isn't Yahowsha'. And Yahowsha's message is identical to the Towrah, and thus the opposite of the Qur'an. But that is all trivial compared to the fact that Allah is the antithesis of Yahowah, the Author of Scripture and the inspiration of prophets.

And by the way, Muhammad never got a single prediction right. He didn't even report history accurately. And as for science, there are no scientific revelations in the Qur'an, not one, but there are scores of scientific mistakes (like the sun going to bed in a swamp each night).

Wake up. You are being played for a fool by the world's most foolish religion.

Yada

I am a muslim convert from Roman Catholic Christianity.
I was born in a country with about 40 million Muslims
I went to school with Muslim Kids
I worked side by side with Muslim men
I dated Muslim girls
I grew up in an affluent Nigerian Family
I converted to Islam of my own free will 19 years ago.

All the above confirm that I know a lot more about Islam and its peoples than you do. It would be feeble of me to simply describe your views as ignorant. The hatred you exude puts you in the same class as

National Party
Nazi Party
Hezbollah
Hamas (fighting for the right to exist as a people in their own land)
Boko Haram (Nigerian Muslim fundamentalist sect that dispices westertn Education)

Please feel free to include any other madmen I forgot or do not know.

Thanks

Be careful what you say Bisong. You have not read Prophet of Doom, and thus do not realize that I know far more about Muhammad, his god, his Qur'an, and his religion, than you do. Unlike you, I don't base my conclusions of what Islam is upon people I went to school with or dated, but instead upon the five oldest and most reliable Islamic sources. They reveal exactly what Islam / Submission was conceived to achieve. They reveal Muhammad's perverted nature and the demonic personality of his wannabe god.

If you had studied Muhammad's words and deeds as they were recorded in the Qur'an, Hadith, Sira, and Tarikh, as I have done, you would not be a Muslim. To know Muhammad as he revealed himself is to hate him. The same thing is true with Allah.

Sadly, like all religious individuals, it is you who are ignorant. You don't know Yahowah. You don't know what God actually revealed. You don't even know Muhammad, the man in whom your faith is based.

Roman Catholicism and Christianity are errant, and for the same reason that Islam is a lie. Both religions contradict the very Scriptures they claim their god inspired. One must therefore be ignorant and irrational to be a Muslim or a Christian. The same can be said for Judaism.

The single most compassionate thing a person can do is to expose the reasons people should not trust their soul to fraudulent religious schemes. While you don't realize it, I'm the most reliable friend any Muslim ever had. I have revealed the truth to you about Muhammad, Allah, the Qur'an, and Islam in Prophet of Doom. And I've done so freely.

If you read Prophet of Doom you will find 77 pages of the book which juxtapose Hitler's Mein Kampf with Muhammad's recitals. Islam and Nazism are surprisingly similar. Both are anti-Semitic and hateful. Both were inspired by the same spirit.

The Land of Yisra'el does not belong to Hamas. Yahowah gave it to the very people Allah hates. Hezbollah is Allah's Party, and unlike you, Boko Haram represent good, fundamentalist Muslims.

Read Prophet of Doom, and then write me again. You have a lot to learn.

Yada

I actually mistook you for a serious person. But the sections of your reply I have highlighted below speak volumes.

Thanks

Fortunately, I did not mistake you for a serious, informed, or rational person. I realize that you are a religious person and thus afraid of evidence and reason.

So I am not surprised that you are ignorant of the alarming similarities between Islam and Hitler's religion. You are unaware of the fact that Hitler's Jihad is among the best selling books in the Islamic world after the Qur'an because they are so similar. And ignorant of the Qur'an, you don't know that it is more anti-Semitic than Hitler's Mein Kamph.

Ignorant of Hebrew, you don't know that Israel is actually Yisra'el. It means "Individuals who engage and endure with God." And unaware of who God actually is, you don't know that His one and only name is Yahowah. You don't even know the first thing about the Covenant and its promises even though your pretend god claims he authored the Towrah where the Beryth is revealed and explained.

So, like all religious people, you will continue to wallow in your ignorance. Your faith demands it. But at least you were warned. You are now without excuse.

Yada

Just checked Amazon.com. You are just trying to sell a book. Good Luck

Wrong again foolish religious person. I don't sell any books. I give them away free. The books which are selling at Amazon are between others and have nothing to do with me.

Prophet of Doom is available free in its entirety in HTML, PDF, and MP3. Countless Muslims have read it--and those who have are no longer Muslims. The truth against Muhammad, Allah, Islam, and the Qur'an is irrefutable.

But don't let evidence and reason get in the way of your faith. It's smarter to rely on schoolmates and dates. Good luck with that.

Yada

Let us all wait for the last day

Or better yet, B, why not exercise your brain and study the evidence? You can still correct the ignorant and irrational mistake you made when you chose to place your faith in Muhammad, a man who didn't issue a single prophecy which came true, who by his own admission lied, who was a pedophile, a rapist, incestuous, a mass murderer, and a terrorist, and who financed his new religion by way of kidnapping, the slave trade, and armed robbery. Those are the facts, B, and they are irrefutable.

There is a God, and for most there will be a judgment day. But for you to know Him, and to avoid it, you will first have to walk away from the religious lie which now ensnares your soul and has sidelined your brain. If you avail yourself of the gift of Prophet of Doom, which is based entirely upon the oldest and most credible Islamic sources, and come to your senses, then we can talk again, and I'll point you in Yahowah's direction. You see in His Towrah, Yahowah told Abram that before he could engage in the Covenant Relationship, he would first have to walk away from Babylon, from religion and politics, from patriotism and societal customs. And this remains the prerequisite for all who want to know God and avoid judgment.

The truth is at your fingertips, B. Are you really going to wait until it is too late to consider the evidence?

Yada

Hi Yada

This book will be worth getting:

http://www.amazon.com/De...id=1319187677&sr=8-1

It refers to a tradition that Muhammad did not die in 632AD but lived longer and led the conquest of the Holy Land. The sources of this tradition are not exclusively Islamic and they pre-date the Sira. I have read a previous boook by the author, on the origins of one aspect of the cult of the virgin Mary (he is not Roman Catholic or Eastern Orthodox) and it is obvious that he knows how to handle source material well.

For some reason the book will be available here in England on Amazon.co.uk one month later than from Amazon.com, so I shall be ordering it airmail from the latter next week. However Amazon.co.uk gives a Table of Contents which Amazon.com does not, as follows:

Introduction
Chapter 1. "A Prophet Has Appeared, Coming with the Saracens": Muhammad's Leadership during the Conquest of Palestine According to Seventh- and Eighth-Century Sources
Chapter 2. The End of Muhammad's Life in Early Islamic Memory: The Witness of the Sira Tradition
Chapter 3. The Beginnings of Islam and the End of Days: Muhammad as Eschatological Prophet
Chapter 4. From Believers to Muslims, from Jerusalem to the Hijaz: Confessional Identity and Sacred Geography in Early Islam
Conclusion: Jesus and Muhammad, the Apostle and the Apostles
Notes
Bibliography
Index
Acknowledgments

Best
TW

TW,

It's good to hear from you. It's been a long time. I hope you are well.

I won't be buying his book. There is no possibility that this occurred. It isn't in Satan's nature to have accomplished such a thing and not brag about it.

Think about it for a moment. Satan on behalf of his "prophet" in his Qur'an details all four meaningless "battles" with the merchants of the mud hut berg of Mecca, all four inconsequential terrorist raids against the Yahuwdym of Yathrib and Khabar, and ends in the fifth surah, the Qur'an's last chronologically, by promoting an unpopular and unsuccessful raid against a tiny and meaningless Byzantine outpost, but does not even mention his conquest of Satan's primary target: Jerusalem and Israel. That is not reasonable. He even talks of riding the flying ass to Jerusalem in the Qur'an.

If this had happened, an additional, and the longest of the suras would have been devoted to this battle. There would have been many hundreds of hadith regaling it as well in Ishaq, Tabari, Bukhari, and Muslim. But these do not exist. They all tell an entirely different story - one which is not the least bit flattering in a religion that above all else loves to brag (Allau Akbar).

The Qur'an is the oldest witness of Muhammad's life. Ishaq's Sira - Biography is the second oldest. Both were transferred from hearsay to writing in the 8th century. And Tabari's Tarikh - History is by far the oldest and most complete history of Islam's formation and eventual wars. So this author's hypothesis is in complete contradiction with all of those sources.

So while I don't really care when and where Muhammad died, or who he killed or captured, this story is wholly inconsistent with Satan's nature and style, and that I do care about. Billions continue to be beguiled by Satan's religious schemes, and yet this demonic spirit remains remarkably transparent and consistent.

The extant evidence, as well as reason, says that the Muhammad who founded Islam died and was buried, having never once left central Arabia. His disease, Islam, did however infect Israel and the world. And its hosts all too often bear the name of their prophet "Muhammad." They were even called "Muhammadens." So in this sense, Muhammad did go on to conquer Jerusalem after his death.

As for the "cult of Many" witnessed today in Orthodox Christianity and Roman Catholicism, you don't have too look very hard to find its origins. It comes from the place known for conceiving religious myths: Babylon - the home of the Trinity, of Easter, Christmas, the Cross, Sunday Worship, and a dying and resurrected god. That said, the cult associated with the Queen of Heaven and Mother of God made its way through the Egyptian, Greek, and Roman religions before being incorporated into Christianity.

I have attached a current draft of an Introduction to God. After having written Questioning Paul, I began this book which focuses on the seven things most important to Yahowah: His Word, His Name, His Towrah, His Covenant, His Instructions, His Invitations, and His Prophets. While it is especially revealing, to appreciate Yahowah's perspective on these things, you will have to walk away from Christianity. It is a prerequisite - just as Abram had to walk away from Babylon before he could engage in the Covenant. So be forewarned.

If you read the Introduction to God, send me a note and share your thoughts.


Yada

Hi Yada




It is the possibility that there might be more that causes me to want to read Shoemaker. He knows how to locate and mine ancient documents more deeply than most. He did enough in his earlier book for me to want to read this one, and until I have read it I cannot really say more. I recognise the good reason you have given for your scepticism and will hold it in mind while reading Shoemaker.



Concerning other matters, you need not fear that I shall "reach for my gun" because you have dismissed Paul.



Regardless of my own opinions I welcome discussion with you, because I learned a lot from you about Islam and I appreciated much of Yada Yahweh. The question I put to you when we last exchanged emails, to which you have not so far replied, is this: What is your criterion for which parts of Torah we gentiles are meant to keep, and which not?



It is obvious that, since the death of Ya'shooa, we are not meant to present animals for sacrifice at Yerushalem.



Yet it is also obvious that we must not commit adultery and murder. So some parts of Torah apply, some do not.



Paul gave his answer this question. If you are going to reject Paul (which I respect your freedom to do) then you must provide your own answer, your own criteria. What are they, and what parts of Torah apply and no longer apply, please?



Also, you navigate by the four gospels and the book of Revelation. You have explained why you reject Paul, but why do you reject the non-Pauline letters, ie Hebrews, Peter's, John's, James' and Jude's? I ask these questions in good faith.



All the best
TW

Hi Yada

Regarding Shoemaker, there really is nothing more to say until I've read it.

What would you say to a man in North Korea who reads the Torah and the prophets and the words of Ya'shooa and is convinced, but tells you: "If I don't take a day off work every 7 days then you tell me I am sinning so badly I should be put to death; yet if I do take a day off every 7 days then my boss will instantly accuse me of 'being a Christian' and, given the situation in North Korea, have me shot. What do you advise me to do?"

Incidentally I do read the Torah closely; attached is an exegesis of Deuteronomy 24:1-4 which I have just had published in a theology journal out of Yerushalom.

All the best
TW

If your hypothetical individual had become convinced that he should trust Yahowah he wouldn't be asking me or you for our opinion. He would listen to Yahowah and no one else.

A relationship with Yahowah requires that we divorce ourselves from the religious and political schemes of men. Their rules would mean nothing to him.

It's funny that you would write that the person would take every seven days off, rather than observe the Shabat, or that you'd associate such a thing with Christianity which rejects this instruction.

Hi Yada

Please don't go antagonistic; debate between believers in Yahuweh about the meaning of his scriptures is a good thing, and Proverbs refers to it as "iron sharpening iron". We may not be in full agreement but I am glad to discuss Yahuweh's word with you.



Suppose you found yourself in N Korea and convinced that man of your views; but now he asks you: "You say I am to keep the Shabat or I deserve death, but if I do then it will involve taking the day off work and my boss will regard me as a Christian and have me shot by the police. You taught me about Yahuweh's word and I am not yet expert in studying it; what do you advise me to do?"

Torah also commands every able-bodied male believer to present himself in Yerushalom thee times each year. What would you advise believers who cannot afford three intercontinental flights to Israel annually, plus hotel bills, please?

If you can provide me with your ansers to these questions then I shall be a lot closer to understanding your position.

All the best
TW

Ahoy, Yada!

As one of my primary sources of information on Islam and their jihadist movements, theories, organizations and other things, which you normally present so accurately, completely and undersandably, I just came to a halt this morning when I went to your Islamic Clubs section searching for info on the MB (Muslim Brotherhood)!

http://prophetofdoom.net...Muslim_Brotherhood.Islam

Amazingly it is virtually empty, so I'm hoping you can direct me to another good source for a presentation that I'm preparing to give?

Keep up the great work. I emphatically recommend your site to my volunteers and others in ACT! all the time!

JS

JS,

Thanks for the kind words. You are correct regarding the MB. I've spoken a lot about them on my internet radio program, but I stopped contributing to Prophet of Doom right about the time I would have completed the Islamic Timeline and review of the Muslim clubs. It dawned on me that I had provided sufficient information to prove the point about Islam a thousand times over, and so I was now only adding clutter.

I've been devoting my time to studying Yahowah's Word, and then sharing what I've learned. If you are interested in that research, I'll send you a free attachment of my current book, called An Introduction to God, and links to prior books, such as Questioning Paul.

Yada

You say in Prophet of Doom – Would you believe:-
“The word "day" did not actually appear in the ancient Hebrew text so we don't know if creation took millions or billions of years……”

but: -
http://www.answersincrea...n.org/word_study_yom.htm

Gen: 1-5 “God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, one day”

The Scriptures say that there was “evening and there was morning’ or ‘night and day’ depending on which bible you read, means the same thing anyway. So to me that means a day, not millions of years or more. Before you can use a word it meaning must first be understood before it can be used as an analogy or metaphor for example. For example Jesus referred to himself as like a gate that people have to go through to get to the Father and therefore, as Genesis was the first book …..
The reason it is also important to see Genesis from a scientific point of view is that it is an eye-witness account as inspired by the Holy Spirit, of Creation and as it is in so many other ways, completely foundational to Christianity it is important to recognise its accuracy. Last polls showed that in the USA up to 80% of school leavers that attend church also leave church because they believe the Bible is unreliable according to their scientific teaching through school and just full of stories about how to be nice. They are not being taught to trust Gods word.
Genesis is indeed extremely important in establishing the first and the ‘second’ Adam and who created everything and of course why.

In verse 3 it says “Let There Be Light”. Did you know that an experiment was done in a laboratory where they bombarded a beaker of water with a particular series of frequencies and found that the water molecules started to vibrate and actually created light? The Spirit of God ‘hovered over the deep’ or the ‘face of the waters’ in some versions – can’t really avoid the science after all Isaac Newton was inspired by Gods word to search for His Truth in this world and look what he discovered.
Anyway I really enjoyed your teaching on Islam, the world needs to know this stuff but not as much as they need to know about Jesus eh? Have a great day.


Regards
Yada

Yada,

Technically, yowm means "hot period," and thus isn't literally "day" in the sense it is used in English. But that aside, I'd present the idea a lot differently if I were writing POD today. Should you be interested, I've written a number of chapters about creation which can be found beginning: http://yadayahweh.com/Ya...hweh_Genesis_Hayah.YHWH. You'll find that presentation stimulating - especially in light of science. It explains how the universe can be both 6 days and 15 billion years old.

But even in these chapters there are things which are not precisely accurate. I'm constantly learning.

Speaking of learning, the Spirit is "Set-Apart," not "Holy." The Towrah was dictated by Yahowah through Yahowsha', not inspired by the Spirit. Christianity is a false religion, as are all religions. And what's funny, is that Christianity is based upon Paul's annulment of the Towrah.

There is no "Jesus." The Ma'aseyah's name is Yahowsha'. And while you cannot know Him without knowing His name, Yahowah, and the Towrah, the world needs to know Yahowah, not Yahowsha'. Christians have tried to turn God into a man. All of God won't fit on a man, and God can neither be born or die. Yahowah saves. That is what Yahowsha' means.

If you'd like to know Yahowah, and participate in the Covenant, I'll gladly send you my most current book which presents the seven topics most important to God.

Yada

Sir,

Your response is RUDE. It shows a personality problem best compared with another "prophet", Muhammad, or modern day Obama; megalomania.

Now I won't waste my time on your web site because I know something about the author.


Thanks for responding.

WG

Even the blunt truth wasn't sufficient to cause you to see the foolishness of your question. It seldom is anymore. Facts and logic no longer prevail, and evidence and reason no longer matter. It's now about individuals not ideas, feelings not thinking, opinions rather than information. Quick and superficial answers which are unsupported have more influence than a thoughtful investigation. It is why the invasion of Iraq turned out so poorly, why the Arab Spring was counterproductive, why Obama won the last election and will win the next, why Christian's don't recognize that Paul contradicted Yahowah. You are looking in the wrong place so you ask the wrong questions before you even know what questions are worthy of resolving.

The answer to your question on authorship was printed boldly on the home page of the site - right on the face of the book itself, presented as prominently as is possible in the upper left hand corner of the site. And the reason it does not matter was answered in the very first paragraph. But you didn't even bother to look.

I was blunt and honest with you knowing full well that you would not have benefited from the thousand pages of evidence. Based upon your letters, it is apparent that you are more comfortable with placing "RUDE" labels on people than you are in either knowing or understanding. So you'd be best served reading a book written by someone like yourself.

While I can't say for sure, I'll bet that those who are most like you would identify themselves with Christianity and the Republican Party - and they would be proud of both, believing that God is on their side. They'd proudly bellow God Bless America.

The Ma'aseyah Yahowsha' was both blunt and truthful with political and religious individuals like yourself, but it didn't matter. They didn't respond appropriately either. And He is a whole lot smarter and more articulate than I am, so indeed, I was wasting my time.

Rather than being a "megalomaniac," I'm irrelevant. That is the point you have missed.

But I thank you for writing, because you serve as a good example of what is bad.

Yessir, you are certainly irrelevant and will soon have the anonymity you seek that comes with it.

You bet I'm a born again follower of Jesus Christ and a political conservative. I'm well read and well educated and more so I am discerning.

And thus I will block your email because I don't have time for those who veil the truth by trying to claim unique ownership of it.

Yessir, God Bless America.

WG

Just as I thought. You have been poisoned by religion and politics. Evidence and reason will never make any difference. You don't even know the countless ways "Jesus Christ" is wrong, or that you are walking away from Him because you don't actually follow His example. He observed the Torah and you don't.

There is one prerequisite for participating in the Covenant, and that is walking away from the babel of religion and politics. But you still cling to both.

Don't be fooled by my name, I promise I am an atheist. I take issue with your site on intellectual grounds, not religious ones. I agree with many of the things that you say but I wonder, what exactly are you proposing? Your rhetoric is so full of thinly veiled hatred (justified or not) that it makes me wonder if you would like to kill all Muslims in the world. You certainly come off that way.

And your blatant Judeo-Christian bias appears throughout much of the site which renders your academic credibility null and void for two reasons. One, no real intellectual believes in any kind of god under any denomination. Two, Christians and people of other faiths have historically committed as many if not more atrocities than muslims under the pretext of religion and I could find you just as many hateful homophobic racist quotes in the bible to prove it. Just because muslims happen to be the worst ones right now does not mean Islam is worse than other religions.

You clearly have a lot to say and a lot of good, important points, but your site will not convince anyone with a post secondary education. If you presented your argument more methodically and in a less blatantly biased fashion,the site would be great.

MD,

It's a shame that you don't recognize the degree to which atheism has jaundiced your perspective. You are like the scholars and intellectuals that you praise, knowing some things but understanding nothing of importance.

One of the many failings of socialist secular humanism is its politically correct moral code which renders its victims incapable of understanding that it is rational and compassionate to hate deceptive, destructive, and deadly dogmas. You are also incapable of making a distinction between those who wield evidence and reason as their only weapon and those who kill based upon their beliefs.

While I am overtly opposed to Judaism and Christianity, and have written and published volumes to prove both religions false, the most informed and rational approach to proving Islam errant is to compare what it claims to confirm with what it reveals. How could such a self-proclaimed intellectual have missed the obvious?

Logic isn't your strong suit. Beliefs aren't intellectual. Belief is the antithesis of knowing, just as faith is the antithesis of understanding. And while Yahowah does not exist under any denomination, gods exist in every denomination. Mankind is great at making gods in his or her image. Having traveled extensively in the China and the old USSR, I can say that no denomination has been better at this than socialist secular humanists.

Also failing in logic, the fact that Christians have acted badly does not exonerate Islam which has acted worse. Furthermore, Prophet of Doom is based upon Muhammad's words and deeds, and does not condemn Islam based upon future generations of Muslims. The entire book, from beginning to end, is nothing more or less than the best documented, most comprehensive, contextual, and chronological presentation of Islam's five oldest and most credible sources. So it does not commit the fallacy you, out of ignorance, believe it to be guilty of committing. Perhaps you ought to read next time before you share your opinions. You'll come across smarter that way - as if you graduated from third grade.

Demonstrating that you have placed your faith in the replacement moral code of political correctness, you seem to believe that being opposed to the acceptance and normalization of abnormal and unhealthy behavior is to fear it, when it is the opposite.

Having responded to tens of thousands of emails, I have found that it is impossible for people such as yourself, who promote their belief system, to rationally process evidence or reason. So while it won't do you any good, but I've attached An Introduction to God. It proves His existence and witness, not that you will like Him or it.

Yada

Dear Sir Please send a copy of An itroduction to God as I will need to read it to understand where you are coming from.



Am I correct in understanding you come from a Presbyterian background , yet speak as if you believe in a God of your own making as you are unwilling to follow a core of beliefs within instutional religion ( church ).




You say you dont fear Islam ! : then why do you go to so much trouble bringing attention to the horrible practices perpetuate on muslems and 'infidels' alike. Personally, I FEAR ISLAM. For the above reason, for our future ,for what apparently is a badly distorted vision of God and for what I have read on your int.site.
That is why I am engaging with you. However , I must first ascertain if you are honest in your beliefs even if you appear to have wacky ideas of my religion.




Genuine Catholics do not hate anyone ,Christ teaches us to HATE sin but LOVE the sinner. While I recoil from the teachings of Islam , Hate is a word I would rather not use ( for any religion ). If you can see the sense in dropping this word from your vocabulary , you will be a better person for it.




While I have an interest in religious history , I am not a historian . The church did not end with Constantine , this is a slant on history propagated by protestants to reinforce their beliefs and because of your protestant background you cannot accept this fact ( this is a personal opinion ).Christ clearly states "The gates of hell shall not prevail against it"



Your sentence starting with "And my understanding" is patently false as the Church holds dear all the written evidence penned by the early fathers of the faith prior to Constantine. None of this material contradicts the teaching of the modern Church, This huge resource is held by the Vatican, is freely available to historians , but is shunned by people like yourself.




How can your understanding of the Catholic religion be more comprehensive than mine . Please understand , I live it. Well , I do my best to live it.




I am not disputing your view of Islam , my intention is to change your outlook of the Catholic Church. From my perspective , you are a friend with whom I can share a viewpoint. I am not aware of putting forward an irrational viewpoint or argument



I agree it is unwise (and foolish ) to respect something that one believes is SINFUL ( why use such mild words as "harmful" ). I find ir remarkable that you cant respect a church that rejects sin and upholds a high moral standard in accordance with Christs teaching and practice...




Why would you oppose a religion that upholds the revelations contained in the old and new testament.



You have found a scapegoat to vent your venom by twisting the meaning of benign words and customs into vile images to fit your distorted line of reasoning in order to attack them.



This smacks of HITLERS demonizing of the jews. Your attitude has the same potential to create the same hell on earth for christians.



I'll be here all day if I comment on every word so will keep it brief. Bablon , satanic. Lord , Christ is Lord. Church , " You are Peter and on this rock I will build My CHURCH.



Christian , followers of Christ.



Cross , Execution.



Halos & sunburst , reverence/holy.



Gospel , Good news.



Trinity , revealed nature of God.




Saints , Christian community.




Pope , Father . Fathers , We all have one.




Nuns , Women who dedicate their life to God. Cardinals , dont know. Hierarchal order , set on Peter/ if the church was a democracy it would split into a 'thousand" sects re.: Protestants.



At this time you wont understand Queen & Mother , Eucharist , Jesus physically present. You appear not to believe in the Divinity of Our LORD. Mass , "Do this in memory of Me" commemorating Christs Life,Death & Resurrection.




Bowing , incense, candles , reverence. In ancient times,this was how ( custom ) Kings were Honoured (look at heads of state today ) and it is only natural that we give the highest honour to God. Christmas / Easter, Celebrating Christs birth and resurrection. All Hallows , remembering those who have died.( Im sure you do that ).Sunday , the Lords Day. New Test. , your kidding. Purgatory , remission of sin. Holy Spirit , Helper. Myth , story to explain/rationalise religious truth/Our LORD used parables. The Church upholds the Covenant : God reveals himself and His expectations IN TIME. Christ IS the new covenant e.g. He condensed the Ten Commandments to " LOVE God etc & LOVE your neighbour " and broke the Sabbath often as LOVE overides all the O.T. covenants. Are you living in the past and refuse to change. We do honour WHWA name but be mindful that the Jews would not speak it out of reverence.
You will have to explain your " teachings of the Catholic Church " paragraph as your comments are a complete mystery to me , cant make sense of them at all.
Hold on ! My mind isnt open ! Evidence & reason mean nothing to me ! You are making claims based on a simple email sent to you which you have no evidence of.
Strange, Ive never read in the O.T. that souls will cease to exist. Will you kindly point out where it says this as I do have an open mind.
As for terms such as Easter ; sure , the name may originate from paganism , So what .The same practice happens in Mexico where you would realise some old traditions are held firmly, so the Church does its best to steer the faithful in the right direction . In time, words often lose their original meaning and no christian today believes they are celebrating a pagan festival.e.g. The word " gay " has lost its original meaning and is only used and understood in terms of same sex relationships. Yet you KNOW the "festival " occurs at the actual time of the Jewish passover and the reason why. Again Christmas ( Christ-mass ) celebrates the coming of the Lord into history, We do this by going to Mass ( see above brief definition ). We dont know Jesus actual birth date so the Church chose a Roman Holiday to redirect the faithfuls attention to a higher cause. Pagan customs such as easter eggs take on a new meaning : a new life in Christ. Old customs die hard, If you are a thinker as you claim for yourself , you KNOW this is TRUE and you practice many traditions celebrated by your parents eg. birthdays. We take this for granted.
Your next paragraph indicates you hold some crazy beliefs as you seem to be rejecting the O.T. & N.T. Ok, send your evidence. You have not given one shred of evidence for your case and have resorted to a vicious attack which is completely uncalled for and ungodly. Your statement "You are allergic to anything that proves your religion unreliable " is PROOF of your closed mind as you know absolutely nothing about me apart from my brief email.
To say " We are not on the same side " is ridiculous in your reference to belief in God. You are confrontational rather than conciliatory. Your attitude contradicts Christs commmand to LOVE. Its your choice.
As a prerequisite ,you are asking me to walk away from a GOD OF LOVE ? Hold on , I am on YHWH side , thereby by your own judgment you condemn yourself with your own words " You are not ". Your demonstrating an incredible arrogance apparently based on strongly held convictions ( closed mind ) of a completely new wacky religion. However , I look forward to reading your leaflets as nothing you have said makes sense. To understand where you are coming from please send " An introduction to God "
Finally , MY GOD does not HATE ( animosity ) anyone or church doing the will of God. I suspect your God mirrors YOU and the God of Islam. The christian God hates SIN, regardles , HE loves the SINNER. After all , none of us are perfect , we all struggle on a daily basis to do the right thing.
My hope is that you will see the Catholic Church in a better light than your current perspective.

Sincerely
L

Wow! ! Is all I can say. You take messed up twisted minds to a completely different level. All I can say is sadly ure efforts are a wasted as you have the wrong end of the stick. Its like saying water is used to make fire...I'd like to help u out. May God grant you sincerity in seeking the truth and may your soul not rest till u achieve inner peace in knowing the truth and repent for your state of ignorance.

Yes, I see where you are coming from. To call the most comprehensive presentation of Islam's five oldest and most historically reliable sources "ignorant" makes perfect sense from a religious perspective. And to call the best documented chronological and contextual presentation of Muhammad's words and deeds as they are recorded in the Qur'an, Hadith, Sira, and Tarikh "messed up and twisted" is equally revealing and astute.

I wish I could say that "you take messed up twisted minds to a completely different level," but such ignorance and irrationality are commonplace among the religious, and most especially Muslims. Your god and his prophet have beguiled you - playing you for a complete fool. But that's hardly "Allahu Akbar," because you made it easy for them.

Next time before you slander a book, take the time to read it. You might learn the truth that way.

Yada

Hi Yada,Ken, PoD webmaster & team...
One small inquiry regarding your feedback.
I peruse your site very regularly for info & ammo for all kinds of discussions that I have with people.
Lately,more like for 4 years, you have posted no emails from enquirers.
Is it because you have not had any or are too swamped with other work.?
Don't get me wrong,there is no criticism on my part but I am just curious...
It has been a long time since I have come across any correspondence from your inbox..
Hoping you are all well.

PS, If it means anything to you,I am not the best at forming or articulating my own arguments.
Not sure if it's my own lack of education,lack of self esteem or shyness but with the continued
reference to your texts aka PoD, I can absolutely transfix my listener to the extent that they know
that what I am saying is true...

I always end with Yada & Kens names & also the PoD.net site...

& My favourite saying I always end with is;

"Truth can never be told so as to be understood & not be believed" William Blake

Cordially
DC

DC,

I made a deal with Yahowah that I'd engage with Him on Islam under a very specific set of conditions. After conducting 2500 radio and television interviews one of those conditions was not met. So I retired from that mission. The fact is, we completed that mission which is why God disengaged.

Since that time I have been given a much more important and controversial mission: that of using Yahowah's Word to expose and condemn Christianity and Judaism. I've written three books on these topics.

I'm glad that you have found PoD helpful. You are using it exactly as it was intended. The evidence contained in it was presented judgmentally to encourage understanding. And once you understand a subject it becomes much easier to teach others.

When the truth is told, known, and understood, belief is irrelevant, as is faith.

C

Hey, I've visited your website on occasion and I think its awesome! I am a contributor to Dr. Ali Sina's website FaithFreedom.org and I am a former Muslim and a former Muslim apologist who as a Muslim debated Dr. James White, David Wood, Nabeel Qureshi, Sam Shamoun, Tony Costa, and Walid Shoebat (former PLO terrorist. I also debated Shaikh Shaker Elsayed on an intransigence topic ( he is the Imam of Dar al Hijrah mosque in Virginia commonly recognized for 2 hijackers attending it and Anwar Awlaki being an imam there.

Since leaving Islam I've been in search for the meaning of reality and existence and currently claim agnosticism. After a period of time that involved grieving, praying and reflecting, I turned back to apologetics to challenge my beliefs and defend them. So I came out as a former Muslim and Muslim apologist in two debates. There were alot of firsts in these two debates, but I'd like to share with you the material if by any chance you had time. Your insight, advice and guidance would be immensely appreciated.

Thanks,

FQ

Problem of Evil:

http://www.faithfreedom....aatari-vs-farhan-quresh/

Is Hell Just:

http://www.faithfreedom....alusi-vs-farhan-qureshi/


Both of these debates were with the Muslim Debate Initiative in London, UK.

The following lecture on Spirituality took place at Skepticamp DC at the University of Maryland, College Park:

http://www.faithfreedom....ticism-and-spirituality/

FQ

Thank you for the kind words. Prophet of Doom was a labor of love. It is the second most important thing I've done with my life.

I'm a huge fan of Ali Sina. I'm glad to hear that you contribute to his site.

I know most of the men on your list, two personally, Sam and Walid. They are good men. I was once very active in debating Muslims, but soon came to realize that for a host of reasons it is a complete waste of time. Today I endeavor to teach those who are open to learning. And I focus on understanding, which I think is vastly more important than knowing.

If you are a thinking, open-minded agnostic searching for the meaning of life, then I can help you. Please read the attached Introduction to God. You will come to know why evil exists, who is responsible for it, and how to mitigate its influence.

So that you know, unlike Sam and Walid, I am not religious. In fact I hate all religions as does God.

I noticed your concerns over "hell." The truth about the place, and who actually goes there, eliminates the most common agnostic complaint against God. You will be surprised and satisfied by what you discover in this regard.

Yahowah does not hear the prayers of those who do not know Him. And He has no interest in grief. So, if you want to know Him observe His Towrah, come to know what He has to teach you, and then once you understand what He is offering, respond to Him. The Introduction to God was written specifically to help agnostics achieve such understanding. It is a very, very challenging read, but well worth your time.

Please stay in touch...

Yada

I'm with you on this subject, in all ways but one. The Yada Yaweh site is a
religious site for the new absolutist version of Christianity which, in due
time, could end up being every bit as nasty as Islam is. I am disappointed that you could regard them as valid partners.

I would like to participate and help you, but this stops me cold. I will do
nothing that promotes yet another absolutist religion. Moreover, a religion has the worst standing of all to be castigating another religion. The general public will easily put what they say down to religious competition and enmity, nothing more.

Since 1994, I have been studying Islam. For years now, I have tried to get
people online to do their OWN homework on it, so they can know what I know.
Merely telling them what I'd learned couldn't be enough, since they could
easily just "blow it off." They can't blow off what they dug out and
researched for themselves.

Your site helps people to do that research. I must give you grand applause
for having developed a single download of the Quran, which puts each
translated sentence or phrase next to the other translations of the same
sentence or phrase. That was a masterful stroke on your part. When I first
started studying Islam, I could only download the Quran one chapter at a
time. Few people would be patient enough to download all 114 books. This
is, of course, deliberate, to insure that very few people (including
Muslims, and especially new converts) would actually READ the Quran, cover
to cover. Worse still, there were other translations, and they, too, had to
be downloaded chapter by chapter. Since I had to go through all that, I can
fully appreciate a single download that brings me ALL of them and puts it
all together, so I can compare different translations without having to
bebop between downloads.

I WILL help you this much, though. I have two quotes of the precise same
sura. One I'd downloaded at least 10 years ago. The other I cut-pasted
when a Muslim captive in the war with Afghanistan was asked what Islam
thinks about prisoners of war. He quoted from memory, and his memory was of
the Arabic version, and he had no difficulty putting it into English, since
he spoke it well. I said he'd quoted it - he actually "spat" it at the
journalist who asked him the question.

Here are the two quotes. The first from my download, and the second from
this Muslim:

"The Prophet is not supposed to take any captives to strengthen
his position on the earth. You want worldly gains but God wants
the life hereafter for you. God is Majestic and All-wise (8:67)."

"It is not fitting for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of
war until he has made a great slaughter in the land." [Quran
8:67]

I don't know which translation my download came from, (I think the site was
islamicity, but not sure - my download was lost when my D drive died, and
all I had left of it was a document with these quotes in it), but it seems
that the first quote has since been "edited" yet again, to be somewhat
closer to the second quote - not quite the same, though. They must have
realized that they'd been found out on their rewrite of that whole sura.

When I realized this discrepancy, I also realized that Muslims have no
compunctions about converting Western people to an Islam that doesn't exist
and never did. They'd "sweetened up" certain texts in the Quran so as to
get around certain Western values that might interfere with their
conversion.

They are THAT unprincipled in obtaining converts. A "false Muslim" is
worse than an infidel. He should be tortured at great length before being
allowed to die. They are "converting" false Muslims like mad in the West,
KNOWING that they aren't real Muslims. But if it became convenient to do
so, they could torture and slaughter them, even though it was THEY who made
them false Muslims in the first place. Nice, huh?

So many Western Muslims still don't know what Islam is all about. It is for
this reason, among others, that I am firmly convinced that violence against
Muslims is thoroughly reprehensible. It is what Muslims WANT the West to do, and plays into their hands. The cost of war will only weaken US, militarily and economically. One of their goals is to try to destroy our economies, and nothing does that better than war.

Hating them is just as useless, because hating only
corrodes the hater inside, and does no harm to the hated. It does, however, taint the person's thinking and renders him far less able to think rationally and analytically.

What we need in the free world is a pragmatic plan to THWART their goal of
world conquest. The chances of our ever doing it are slim to none. Until
it's too late to do any thwarting any longer. But it IS our only chance to stop them in their quest for conquering the world.

If you look carefully, you will see that Europe (all of it) is already in
their cross-hairs. There are mega-millions of Muslims living there. Now,
with the "Arab Spring" (tra la?), they are ousting former dictators who had
not been PIOUS ENOUGH. They had FAILED to make Islamic States out of their
countries, and the "Arab Spring" is now correcting that little error by
establishing Islamic States themselves.

Most people make the mistake of assuming that everyone MUST want freedom and
liberties. Muslims SAY they do, but it's impossible. Their faith is the
inside-out of democracy, and to them, it is blasphemous and obscene. They
don't have an option to choose democracy. They can't, and still remain
Muslims.

Most people also don't know that Muslims LIE. When they want an answer
about Islam, they take the shortcut of asking a Muslim. They get the
sugar-coated lies and believe them. But lying to infidels, in Islam, is
righteous and good. It is the only religion that makes dishonesty a virtue.

Islam, and the cultures it spawns is reallly so utterly ALIEN to the Western
people that they can't wrap their minds around its realities, and when they
begin to suspect those realities, they're too scared to take it any further.
They DIVE into their denial.

Now, imagine Tunesia, Libya and Egypt (maybe with Syria and a few other new
Islamic States) using the combined military and arsenals of those nations to
attack Europe all at once, while on the same day those mega-millions of
"peaceful, tolerant" Muslims do the "Glasgow-thing". Europe would fall like
a stone. How could they go after these jihadis when they're thoroughly
intermingled with innocent citizens? To try would slaughter many innocents.
No nation on earth is prepared to deal with this kind of threat, not even
the U.S., or it, combined with all the free world.

These people MEAN BUSINESS about their global conquest. They are
MOBILIZING, right now, to conquer Europe, and don't even need to be subtle
about it, because the free world is in such obsessive denial of reality.

It won't be pretty. But it will be soon. They could, in a pinch, even pull
it off right now.

This scares me at my deepest levels. It ought to do likewise to all free
people. I know "it's the oil," but IS oil really worth more than our own
survival?

F,

While I agree that Christianity has been and could be almost as nasty as Islam, Yada Yah is opposed to Christianity, Judaism, Islam, and Socialist Secular Humanism. I do not regard any religious person or institution as a "valid partner." So, your understanding of YY is deeply flawed.

I didn't solicit your participation. And I am not religious. I am anti-religious. You are confusing knowing and understanding Yahowah with religion - a common but misguided mistake.

That is not to say that I am perfect. I'm in the process of editing YY, correcting my mistakes. At the time I wrote it I was unaware that Paul was a false prophet (read www.QuestioningPaul.com), the the Christian New Testament was untrustworthy, or that the Covenant had not yet been renewed (all covered in the attached ITG). So over the next six months I will endeavor to remove these errors. It is part of learning.

While you won't like it much either, as it is "aboslutist" in nature, I've attached an Introduction to God. It is not only well researched, it, like Prophet of Doom, provides the tools needed for others to engage in their own research. My goal with it is to get more people to do their own homework. The more they know, the better. But ultimately, my hope is to promote understanding.

A friend of mine created the parallel Qur'ans. It is a great tool, and he is to be commended. He, like you, was once an atheist. He became an agnostic because atheism required too much faith. But then when he saw all of the religious myths which had caused him to reject the gods of religion disassociated from Yahowah in YY he began a voyage of discovery which led him to Yahowah.

The greatest gift of POD, however, is the basis of the book. It reorders the Qur'an chronologically and sets it into the context of Muhammad's life by using the Hadith. It enables readers to not only know what Muhammad and his pretend god Allah had to say, but more importantly to understand what they were trying to achieve.

We agree on many things, however. Most Muslims are ignorant of what the Qur'an and Hadith actually reveal. Most Muslims are willing to lie to achieve their goals. A peaceful Muslim is a hypocrite. The West's wars in Islamic nations are all counterproductive.

Hate is often appropriate however. I hate all religions and most political and military schemes. So does God. It is wise and compassionate to hate that which is deceitful, destructive, and deadly.

Yahowah proved His existence through precise and accurate predictions. One of these focuses on the fate of Islam. The religion will ultimately be destroyed, but not before Islamic nations unify for one last war against Israel. When all of the pieces fall into place and that occurs in 2027, read YY and the ITG and you will understand how the religion is ultimately destroyed.

The "Arab Spring" is actually an "Islamic Reformation." It is a prelude to the Magog/Islamic War. It is about submission, not freedom. And Islam is way to debilitating for Muslims to conquer the world. It is what they want, but at best they are only qualified to destroy, not conquer.

The Islamic nations are not going to turn their weapons against Europe. Once they stop fighting each other, they will all turn on Israel, who by that time, and thanks to the US, will be out gunned 100 to 1.

I know the future because Yahowah has revealed it. But I am not afraid.

Yada

Dear Yada,

I find your book Prophet of Doom very well put together, very informative, and very accurate. Its shined a whole new light on Muhammad for me. Already i hated him but after reading your book, im just burning with rage. Mainly because my whole family and relatives r muslim and they have fallen for this deception. Anyways I want to congratulate you on a job well done. I would love a hard copy of it. Please let me know if it's possible. I've been a long time listener to Stan Johnson from the Prophecy Club. I told him all about you and I said you have to get Yada on your show. Stan has the most interesting guests on and I think you will bring a lot of valuable information to his audience regarding Islam and other fake religions. I would love to hear you on his show. I recently started listening to your show on Yada Yahweh. I must say after hearing you I feel like a crooked, dirty, and corrupt Christian. I learned a lot from you and I thank you. I hope you will contact Stan soon and I look forward to hearing you on his show.

C

C,

Thanks for the kind words regarding Prophet of Doom. Every hardback has been sold, so sorry to say but it is only available online. But lots of folks read it on their iPads and Kindles.

I don't solicit interviews any longer, but I don't turn them down either. But since Stan is a Christian, he wouldn't be comfortable with what I had to say - nor would his audience.

Christianity is corrupt, so I hope you leave it in favor of the Covenant. I've attached An Introduction to God which will help you in this regard.

Yada

Yada,

Thank you for responding to my letter. And thank you for sending the attachment!!! I look forward to reading it and digesting the info. While being a very 'spiritual' person myself, and an 'Ordained Minister' thru the Church of God, I had long ago walked-away from the traps and pit-falls associated with indoctrinated religions. However, it was during my studies for the ministry that my eyes were truly open. I have no idea why the COG was as open and honest as they were...but, there was still that "hook".
Of course, there is no denying that most all of mankind's religious endeavors were all about power and control - missing the true "message" that God has so often tried to tell/teach us. Greed and lust are powerful "sins" indeed!!

Again, thank you so much!! And, yes, I have read a lot of the comments that were posted on your site. Very 'eye-opening' - almost appalling in the way that many Muslims still deny that which is right in front of them. Sad. False god, false religion, false heaven, but, very real terror.

You are blessed. You have been shown the way.

DW

DW

Based upon what you have written you may find the ITG helpful. If you read it, please share your thoughts.

What Christians don't realize is that Towrah means "teaching," and that the Towrah alone provides the guidance required to know Yahowah, to form a relationship with Yahowah, and to be saved by Yahowah. And since Paul's letters are all anti-Towrah, rather than speaking for Yahowah, Paul was His adversary.

Most all of us have been shown the way. But very few of us have observed what we have been shown sufficiently to move in that direction. This is what the Introduction to God will do for you. But to benefit from it, you will have to completely walk away from your ordination.

Yada

Irritation? How is this:

I believe America IS the Mystery Babylon of Rev. 18, Jer 50 & 51, Isa 13, 21 and 47.
There is NO pre-trib, mid-trib, or pre-wrath rapture going to save anyone.
Only in righteousness will we find safety. The prayer closet.
The fall of America will occur somewhere in the vicinity of 2020 to 2024, but the tribulation will not start until around 2040 that means 20 years of hell in America.
The return of Jesus is near 2047, not date setting, just calculated guessing.
The point is there is lots of trouble coming.

However, I don’t go in for all the Yahweh and Yahshua stuff. They know their names and they go by many names.
I use them casually not by hard rule. If you want to use them on the program that is fine with me.
I do keep the feasts, but out of love not out of a hard commandment.

Do you have books or DVD’s on prophecy? Tell me more, please.

Can you provide an introduction?
What topics can you speak about. For example:

Stan Johnson has studied Bible prophecy for 30 years, has been teaching it for 20 years, and as founder of The Prophecy Club he has hosted speaking tours for over 135 guest speakers over the last 18 years. These 135 speakers have made over 235 DVD’s on Bible prophecy. He is considered to be one of the most informed speakers on Bible prophecy and future events. He is also the President and CEO of Prophetic Oil, Inc. whose goal it is to find the prophesied oil in Israel.

· He was also responsible to introduce the warning of Dumitru Duduman to thousands, and his primary mission is to continue the warning.

· He also introduced Hayseed Stephens to America, one of the men whose vision was to find oil in Israel and he also continues his vision.



Stan’s Prophecy Club DVD’s.
1. America in Prophecy
2. The Battle of Armageddon
3. Prophecies of Oil In Israel
4. More Prophecies of Oil In Israel
5. Asher’s Hidden Prophecy of Oil in Israel
6. The Secret Door to Understand All Prophecies
7. The Truth About the Rapture
8. More Truth About the Rapture
9. Revelation Verse by Verse (Triple dvd)
10. Daniel Verse by Verse (Triple dvd)
11. The Coming Police State
12. Oil and Judgment
13. Building Your Prayer Closet: Protection in the Day of Trouble
14. Mark of the Beast Almost Here
15. DNA of the Mark of the Beast
16. The Next 911
17. What Would it Take For America to Repent?
18. The Middle East War
19. Isaiah Verse by Verse (8 CD’s)
20. 122 Signs to Eternity
21. Artificial Life: Image of the Beast
22. System of the Mark of the Beast
23. Islam in Prophecy
24. Oil: The Whole Story
25. Revelation Verse by Verse 2.0
26. Daniel Verse by Verse 2.0
27. Joel Verse by Verse


God bless,

Stan

Hi Stan,

Sorry that you "don't go in for all the 'Yahowah and Yahowsha'' stuff." God knows His name. He told us His name 7000 times. Nothing is more important than knowing His name. He only has one name. He etched in stone that He does not and will not tolerate being called by any other name. I wish you used it consistently because "Jesus" isn't His name. That name was created by men in the 17th century.

I've attached my most recent book. It devotes an entire volume to explaining Yahowah's name as well as Yahowsha's.

While America is rotten to the core and will be destroyed, it isn't Babylon per se (which is from babel, meaning to corrupt), Christianity is the best fit - especially Roman Catholicism. But this whore has many harlots which include other religions and politics, economics, and militarism.

You should be very careful with anything in Revelation after chapter 17, because none of it is extant in any pre-Constantine manuscript. The textual evidence from the oldest manuscripts demonstrates that much of the Christian New Testament is unreliable. This too is proven in the attached book.

And speaking of the NT and of prophecy, according to Yahowah the Covenant has not yet been renewed, so the whole concept of a "new testament" is errant. The renewal of the Covenant will occur upon Yahowah's return, this reconciliation will be with Yisra'el and Yahuwdah, and it will be based upon writing the Towrah inside of us. The proof of this is contained in the attached book as well.

There is no reason to guess when Yahowah will return because He revealed His timeline. And yes, I've written extensively about this.

Yahowah told us that He does not hear the prayers of those who ignore His Towrah, so the "prayer closet" isn't going to save anyone unless they know who they are talking to. And the only way to know Yahowah, to engage in a relationship with Yahowah, and to be saved by Yahowah is to observe His Towrah (which means "teaching," not "Law"). It is there you will learn the purpose of the Taruw'ah harvest Christians misname the "rapture" based upon the testimony of the false prophet Paul.

If you read An Introduction to God you will know of what I speak. If you do, and if you'd like to discuss it, let me know. I'd be happy to share anything in it with you and with your audience.

Keeping the Feasts isn't what Yahowah had in mind, and there are no actual Commandments. There isn't even a Hebrew word for obey. Shamar means to observe, not to keep in the sense of obeying an order. So it is by coming to know what the seven Called-Out Meetings actually represent, by understanding their role in the Covenant and in our salvation, and by relying upon them that they are of benefit to us.

Also, once you understand what the Seven Mow'ed Miqra'ey represent, and understand their role in Yahowah's timeline, understanding prophecy becomes relatively simple. Every major event can be known, understood, and dated.

Let me know if you read the attached ITG and want to discuss it. I'll be gone next week but will return on the 21st of this month.

Yada

Yada

I have long ago walked-away from the 'church' and it's controlling (and hypocritical) nature. I rediscovered my Shawnee heritage many years ago, as well as the spirituality that came along with such rediscovery. I fully immersed myself in the customs and traditions of my father's ancestors. And I discovered what was right before my eyes my whole life - the simplicity that is God (Niji Manito = Great Spirit)
It became easy to understand that God was in everything and was everywhere; we didn't need an "intercessor" to talk to God; all we needed to do was to open our hearts to His presence. Ceremony was mere 'eye candy' - for what father would deny the voice of his child? And, are we all not God's children, created in His image?? This seems to be the 'conundrum' that plagues the worlds religions. The reasons are both obvious and incriminating.

There is no doubt that I will enjoy reading ITG!! While I am no editor, and I find it hard to be critical of the work of others, I will definitely share my thoughts on the subject matter. I am intrigued! However, I still find it hard to pull away from POD...lol. That just fascinates the hell out of me....well....it's your writing style...you can be quite hilarious when you state the obvious. LOL No offense, just saying.

DW

I'm Sioux by race, but not by religion. Since God is not in everything or everywhere, you will now have to walk away from a second religious tradition to walk with Yahowah. But if you did it once, you can do it again. We are not all God's children, either. He doesn't even know most of those who have come and gone. We were, however, created in His image. So that is a start.

Feel free to finish POD first. I wrote it first. You may even want to read www.QuestioningPaul.com. The ITG is a challenging read. It will take some time. And it is uncompromising, so it will take an open and receptive mind.

And yes, I love criticism. Please, if you find an error let me know. Even if you think that I've failed to properly understand or convey something important, let me know where I've done so. I'm constantly editing my books to correct them based upon what I've learned.

Yada