logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline nagantmosin  
#1 Posted : Thursday, January 10, 2008 11:40:58 AM(UTC)
nagantmosin
Joined: 1/6/2008(UTC)
Posts: 19
Location: Germany

Rapture


The majority of Christians believe that there is to be a "rapture" of the church/Christians just before the beginning of the "Great Tribulation" that comes in the last days. This beleif has become especially popular through the fictional writings of Tim LaHaye in his "Left Behind" series. Christians that believe in the rapture will tell you that they are going to be spared the suffering that all other non-believers will have to go through during the Great Tribulation, for the Christians will be "raptured" up into the clouds to meet "Jesus" in the air, and will forever be with him in paradise. The scriptures that are commonly quoted to support this belief are these:

1Th 4:13 Now, brothers, we do not wish you to be ignorant concerning those who have fallen asleep, lest you be sad as others who have no expectation. 1Th 4:14 For if we believe that YahuwehShua died and rose again, so also Elohim shall bring with Him those who sleep in YahuwehShua.
1Th 4:15 For this we say to you by the word of the Master, that we, the living who are left over at the coming of the Master shall in no way go before those who are asleep.
1Th 4:16 Because the Master Himself shall come down from heaven with a shout, with the voice of a chief messenger, and with the trumpet of Elohim, and the dead in Messiah shall rise first.
1Th 4:17 Then we, the living who are left over, shall be caught away together with them in the clouds to meet the Master in the air – and so we shall always be with the Master.
1Th 4:18 So, then, encourage one another with these words.

Mat 24:37 "And as the days of Noahò, so also shall the coming of the Son of Aḏam be.
Mat 24:38 "For as they were in the days before the flood, eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noahò entered into the ark,
Mat 24:39 and they did not know until the flood came and took them all away, so also shall the coming of the Son of Aḏam be. Mat 24:40 "Then two shall be in the field, the one is taken and the one is left.
Mat 24:41 "Two shall be grinding at the mill, one is taken and one is left.
Mat 24:42 "Watch therefore, for you do not know what hour your Master is coming.

Luk 17:28 "And likewise, as it came to be in the days of Lot: They were eating, they were drinking, they were buying, they were selling, they were planting, they were building,
Luk 17:29 but on the day Lot went out of Seḏom it rained fire and sulphur from heaven and destroyed all.
Luk 17:30 "It shall be the same in the day the Son of Aḏam is revealed.
Luk 17:31 "In that day, he who shall be on the house-top, and his goods in the house, let him not come down to take them away. And likewise the one who is in the field, let him not turn back.
Luk 17:32 "Remember the wife of Lot.
Luk 17:33 "Whoever seeks to save his life shall lose it, and whoever loses his life shall preserve it.
Luk 17:34 "I say to you, in that night there shall be two in one bed, the one shall be taken and the other shall be left.
Luk 17:35 "Two shall be grinding together, the one shall be taken and the other shall be left.
Luk 17:36 "Two shall be in the field, the one shall be taken and the other shall be left."
Luk 17:37 And they answering, said to Him, "Where, Master?" And He said to them, "Where the body is, there also the eagles shall be gathered together."

Mat 25:1 "Then the reign of the heavens shall be compared to ten maidens who took their lamps and went out to meet the bridegroom.
Mat 25:2 "And five of them were wise, and five foolish.
Mat 25:3 "Those who were foolish, having taken their lamps, took no oil with them,
Mat 25:4 but the wise took oil in their containers with their lamps.
Mat 25:5 "Now while the bridegroom took time, they all slumbered and slept.
Mat 25:6 "And at midnight a cry was heard, ‘See, the bridegroom is coming, go out to meet him!’
Mat 25:7 "Then all those maidens rose up and trimmed their lamps.
Mat 25:8 "And the foolish said to the wise, ‘Give us of your oil, because our lamps are going out.’
Mat 25:9 "But the wise answered, saying, ‘No, indeed, there would not be enough for us and you. Instead, go to those who sell, and buy for yourselves.’
Mat 25:10 "And while they went to buy, the bridegroom came, and those who were ready went in with him to the wedding feast, and the door was shut.
Mat 25:11 "And later the other maidens also came, saying, ‘Master, Master, open up for us!’
Mat 25:12 "But he answering, said, ‘Truly, I say to you, I do not know you.’
Mat 25:13 "Watch therefore, because you do not know the day nor the hour in which the Son of Adam is coming.

Luk 21:36 "Watch then at all times, and pray that you be counted worthy to escape all this about to take place, and to stand before the Son of Aḏam."

Christians take the passages of Scripture listed above and interpret them to say that they (Christians) will be "raptured" and snatched up from the earth by Messiah and will therefore not have to go through any of the hard times of the "Great Tribulation" mentioned in Revelation. Here are some passages of Scripture that plainly contradict the "Rapture" teaching:
1Th 4:13 Now, brothers, we do not wish you to be ignorant concerning those who have fallen asleep, lest you be sad as others who have no expectation. 1Th 4:14 For if we believe that YahuwehShua died and rose again, so also Elohim shall bring with Him those who sleep in YahuwehShua.
1Th 4:15 For this we say to you by the word of the Master, that we, the living who are left over at the coming of the Master shall in no way go before those who are asleep.
1Th 4:16 Because the Master Himself shall come down from heaven with a shout, with the voice of a chief messenger, and with the trumpet of Elohim, and the dead in Messiah shall rise first.
1Th 4:17 Then we, the living who are left over, shall be caught away together with them in the clouds to meet the Master in the air – and so we shall always be with the Master.
1Th 4:18 So, then, encourage one another with these words.

Notice that Shaul states twice that is the "Living who are left over". The "Living who are left over" are those believers that are still alive and SURVIVED the Great Tribulation. They are "left over" and are survivors of the persecution that the beast and the false prophet will inflict on the followers of YahuwehShua Messiah. The greek word "perileipomeni", according to Thayer's Greek Lexicon, means "to leave over". This word occurs only twice in the New Testament, and is found only in the verses we are discussing: I Thess. 4:15 & 17. It is interesting that this verb is a present passive participle, and according to Thayer should be translated "to survive". So, a more accurate translation would be "we, the living who survive". Survive what? The Great Tribulation. What do they survive? Notice the following passages:

Rev 12:16 And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened its mouth and swallowed up the river which the dragon had spewed out of his mouth.
Rev 12:17 And the dragon (Ha Shatan) was enraged with the woman, and he went to fight with the remnant of her seed, those guarding the commands of Elohim and possessing the witness of YahuwehShua Messiah.

Satan is furious because he cannot kill the "woman" that Elohim protects, so what does he do? He goes to persecute those followers of Messiah that are NOT protected from him! So what does he do to these followers of Messiah when he persecutes them?

Rev 20:4 And I saw thrones – and they sat on them, and judgment was given to them – and the lives of those who had been beheaded because of the witness they bore to YahuwehShua and because of the Word of Elohim, and who did not worship the beast, nor his image, and did not receive his mark upon their foreheads or upon their hands. And they lived and reigned with Messiah for a thousand years.

So from this passage we learn that there is a group that will have authority in the 1,000 year kingdom of Messiah to reign with Him on thrones, because they were BEHEADED for their beliefs! They would not "worship the beast, nor his image, and did not receive his mark upon their foreheads or upon their hands"! Perhaps there will be a resurrection of the guillotine to perform this mass execution of Messiah's people.

When does the Return of Messiah occur? When does the first resurrection of Messiah's people occur? AFTER the "Great Affliction". The following passages will clarify this.

Mat 24:29 “And immediately after the distress of those days the sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall not give its light, and the stars shall fall from the heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken.
Mat 24:30 “And then the sign of the Son of Adam shall appear in the heaven, and then all the tribes of the earth shall mourn, and they shall see the Son of Adam coming on the clouds of the heaven with power and much esteem.
Mat 24:31 “And He shall send His messengers with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together His chosen ones from the four winds, from one end of the heavens to the other.

Notice that Messiah comes "immediately after the distress of those days", and THEN the messengers gather His chosen ones to Him. There is no "pre-tribulation rapture" taught by our Master.
Another insight as to when Messiah comes is given by Shaul:

1Th 4:16 Because the Master Himself shall come down from heaven with a shout, with the voice of a chief messenger, and with the trumpet of Elohim, and the dead in Messiah shall rise first.
Which trumpet of Elohim is this? It is important to find out, for this is when the "dead in Messiah" rise, and it is at the coming of our Master! Let's examine I Corinthians 15, for Shaul gives us another clue:

1Co 15:51 See, I speak a secret to you: We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed,
1Co 15:52 in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.

Here Shaul says that the resurrection and the "change" of the living will occur at the "LAST trumpet"! So the question naturally arises: "which trumpet is the last trumpet"? Messiah reveals this to us in His Revelation:
Rev 11:15 And the seventh messenger sounded, and there came to be loud voices in the heaven, saying, “The reign of this world has become the reign of our Master, and of His Messiah, and He shall reign forever and ever!”

This trumpet is the LAST trumpet mentioned in Revelation and it is the 7th trumpet, which is the LAST trumpet. When this trumpet sounds Messiah will come and reign on the earth, establishing His kingdom!
Also note 2 Thessalonians 2:

2Th 2:8 And then the lawless one shall be revealed, whom the Master shall consume with the Spirit of His mouth and bring to naught with the manifestation of His coming.
Messiah will destroy the false-prophet/anti-messiah at his coming! So the persecution of the set-apart ones has to be before the coming of Messiah, for our Master destroys him when He comes! Hallelu-Yah!

Favor and peace to all, Sabatismos
Offline Jeannie  
#2 Posted : Thursday, January 10, 2008 2:43:55 PM(UTC)
Jeannie
Joined: 6/27/2007(UTC)
Posts: 254
Woman
Location: Florida

When you get some time you need to read http://www.futuretruth.net/ chapter 9. Actually the whole book is really good!! It might not change your mind but will give you something new to think about.
Offline nagantmosin  
#3 Posted : Thursday, January 10, 2008 6:43:15 PM(UTC)
nagantmosin
Joined: 1/6/2008(UTC)
Posts: 19
Location: Germany

So, www.futuretruth.net is the source for all truth? Everyone keeps referring me to it like it has more authority than the Scriptures. I've already read it, and it promotes the "Rapture" of Christians, which I disproved in the Scriptures above. There is to be a "snatching up", but it will not be Christians that are snatched up, but those that truly love Messiah and keep His Torah.

N
Offline gammafighter  
#4 Posted : Thursday, January 10, 2008 9:27:43 PM(UTC)
gammafighter
Joined: 11/6/2007(UTC)
Posts: 114
Man
Location: Hilo, Hawaii

Naga-

I don't think anything in FH contradicts the Scripture above.
1. FH does not say that there will be no believers in the time of the Tribulation. There will be converts to Yahushua during that time. People from all beliefs, even Christians, will be converted from their religions and whatnot to a relationship with YHWH.
2. The "Last Trumpet" mentioned above is apparently seen by many to be the 7th trumpet mentioned in Revelation. (I believe) FH shows how this doesn't really work out chronologically, so the Scripture is probably talking about the Last Trumpet during the Feast of Trumpets. This works with the belief that the Harpazo/rapture will occur at the end of the Feast of Trumpets. Specifically on the last trumpet. Revelation was probably written long before Revelation. To allude to a future work is possible through Divine Inspiration, but it would probably serve only to confuse Shaul's readers until Revelation was widely distributed.

Disclaimer:
I haven't actually read all of FH, so I might be wrong. These are really what I have been able to gather through Ken's words on the form along with the various chapters of FH i have read.
Offline Robskiwarrior  
#5 Posted : Thursday, January 10, 2008 10:33:02 PM(UTC)
Robskiwarrior
Joined: 7/4/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,470
Man
Location: England

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
nagantmosin wrote:
So, www.futuretruth.net is the source for all truth? Everyone keeps referring me to it like it has more authority than the Scriptures. I've already read it, and it promotes the "Rapture" of Christians, which I disproved in the Scriptures above. There is to be a "snatching up", but it will not be Christians that are snatched up, but those that truly love Messiah and keep His Torah.

N


I don't believe future truth to be the source of all truth, because I know KP would tell you its not - mainly because he wrote it, (no offense KP ;) ). What is isn't is a shallow stab in the dark like many sites are.

I think our point is there is too much evidence for what is written in Future History that just fits, it works, it doesn't make us feel comfortable or happy - but it fits. not just the "rapture", but everything else. Unfortunately with the evidence presented in YY and FH you cant take anything away because everything is linked. If you took away one prophetic section or event there would be a hole throughout the rest of it, all with it screaming to the event you have taken out.

Last night I tried to prepare a study for our Sabbath group, I thought it would be a good idea to do it on Passover - because its the next feast, and it will open up discussion on a lot of topics for one particular member. What a task... the amount of stuff that I wanted to try and explain, that was linked to Passover, that linked to everything else - It was mashing my head!

I think what I am trying to say, in a nice a way as possible to you Nag, is that there is more to this than just "rapture". I admire your tenacity, but you have to realize that YY and FH are very different from any other site or "Christian" believe you may have encountered before, we don't take verses and make them do what we want - we take the scriptures as a whole - especially when dealing with the prophetic, because thats how it works.

So I don't believe that future truth is the source of all truth, but it makes sense, especially along side the evidence. We could turn that comment around and say that you are also not the source of all truth, because you are also a man.

Please don't take offense :)
Signature Updated! Woo that was old...
Offline bitnet  
#6 Posted : Friday, January 11, 2008 4:41:18 AM(UTC)
bitnet
Joined: 7/3/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,120

Shalom Nag and everyone else,

I too am struggling with KPs explanation of a pre-Trib rapture having read the verses that you quoted in support of your understanding... and I read those verses more than 10 years ago. I have always thought that we would be protected through the Trib or Great Trib before getting transformed and escorted by the angels. I even had a dream 20 years ago about this!

I have also wondered about the events on that week when Yahushua entered Yahrulshalayim before The Sacrifice. My understanding is slightly different but it still gelds with KPs overall timeline.

However, as I have always asked for understanding, I continue to read and pray for enlightenment. Sometimes it takes some additional time to figure it out, or perhaps there may be an explanation that has escaped everyone else and it is up to you to use the Wisdom of the Set-Apart Spirit to share your understanding with the Ekklesia. In doing so, patience is required and it does give you (anyone) a chance to engage and contribute in The Work. The very fact that you are interacting here is proof of your passion and I definitely welcome you, as I am sure everyone else does. We tread lightly around some matters but in no way shall we compromise what is proven and indisputable.

I give full attention to what KP has written because he definitely is inspired by the Ruach Qodesh. Is it all accurate in FH? Well, if you feel strongly about some passages in FH, you are free to disagree. Personally, I'd like to think of a post- or mid-Trib rapture and be surprised rather than pre-Trib rapture and be disappointed. But a pre-Trib rapture would certainly make me and my wife very, very happy! What does it really entail? Who knows for sure what happens each second but we do know that Hanok and Eliyah were taken away and that they did not go up to heaven. Perhaps the same will happen to us in the rapture... we are here one moment, then taken away at the sound of the last trumpet on the Feast of Trumpets... but will re-appear only after those who had died before and during the Trib have been resurrected together with those who lived in faith through the Trib. We probably have no concept of time when we are raptured! So no conflict with what KP says either and I'm definitely all for it to happen as KP says. :-))
The reverence of Yahweh is the beginning of Wisdom.
Offline Matthew  
#7 Posted : Friday, January 11, 2008 5:10:14 AM(UTC)
Matthew
Joined: 10/3/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,191
Man
Location: São Paulo, Brazil

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Hi Nag, welcome to the forum and may the peace of the Messiah be with you.

I have battled this Rapture business for some time now, and I'm still no expert in it. However, the more I view Messianic congregations, and some churches, who don't support the Rapture aren't able to fully explain their different views. Their views just don't hold water when taking into consideration the whole Scriptures. On one Messianic online Sabbath service I attended (online of course) the teacher just said he doesn't like the Rapture theory because it's dangerous. He provided no Scriptural proof as to why he said it, it was "just because" he didn't like it.

Those who die before the Rapture, those taken in the Rapture and those martyred (die) during the Tribulation are those who will rule and reign with the Messiah for a thousand years. They (we) will rule over those who survive through the Tribulation, these survivors (believers who find the Messiah and manage not to get their heads chopped off, including Jews who repent) will continue to live on earth in their mortal states, in other words they will live, they will die, they will have families, etc. At the end of the Millennium, Satan is to be released and he will manage to deceive many. If those who survive through the Tribulation all receive immortal bodies when caught up in the air, then how does Satan manage to deceive many at the end of the Millennium? Those with immortal heavenly bodies cannot sin! This is just one area believers who don't support Rapture cannot seem to explain in support of their theory.

nagantmosin wrote:
Mat 24:29 “And immediately after the distress of those days the sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall not give its light, and the stars shall fall from the heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken.
Mat 24:30 “And then the sign of the Son of Adam shall appear in the heaven, and then all the tribes of the earth shall mourn, and they shall see the Son of Adam coming on the clouds of the heaven with power and much esteem.
Mat 24:31 “And He shall send His messengers with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together His chosen ones from the four winds, from one end of the heavens to the other.

Notice that Messiah comes "immediately after the distress of those days", and THEN the messengers gather His chosen ones to Him. There is no "pre-tribulation rapture" taught by our Master.


Notice verse 31, the messengers gather together His chosen ones from"the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other," there's no mention of earth there. The believers he calls are those already in the air. Correct me is I'm wrong but I think they are called to come witness the end battle.

nagantmosin wrote:
Mat 24:37 "And as the days of Noahò, so also shall the coming of the Son of Aḏam be.
Mat 24:38 "For as they were in the days before the flood, eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noahò entered into the ark,
Mat 24:39 and they did not know until the flood came and took them all away, so also shall the coming of the Son of Aḏam be. Mat 24:40 "Then two shall be in the field, the one is taken and the one is left.
Mat 24:41 "Two shall be grinding at the mill, one is taken and one is left.
Mat 24:42 "Watch therefore, for you do not know what hour your Master is coming.


Nag, what's your take on "eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage"? This doesn't sound like a time of "distress" to me, the Tribulation will be a distressful time, the passage speaks of a time before the Tribulation commences. When it says "so also shall the coming of the Son of Aḏam be" it doesn't mean He will appear before Man for all to see, but the Rapture is a sign of His coming which takes place a few years later. Enoch (representing the Ekklesia) was Raptured before the flood came, and Noah (symbolizes the nation of Israel) was spared through it, who then continued to live on earth afterwards in his mortal state.

Nag, what's your take on the Feast of Trumpets? What does this festival mean to you, what does it symbolize, and why is it celebrated 10 days before the Feast of Atonement?

And concerning Yada's and KP's works, their books (and forum posts and responses) have been most insightful, they have helped me deepen my relationship with my Father. I'm sure if I went it alone I could come up with the same conclusions, given a few lifetimes of course. But we are called to be a family, and they have surely been good brothers to me, sharing their knowledge, and love, of our Father. And sharing it free I might add, just like the gift of salvation we have in Yahshua.

Edited by user Friday, January 11, 2008 7:43:04 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Offline sugarman  
#8 Posted : Sunday, February 3, 2008 9:40:04 PM(UTC)
sugarman
Joined: 2/3/2008(UTC)
Posts: 67

nagantmosin wrote:
So, www.futuretruth.net is the source for all truth? Everyone keeps referring me to it like it has more authority than the Scriptures. I've already read it, and it promotes the "Rapture" of Christians, which I disproved in the Scriptures above. There is to be a "snatching up", but it will not be Christians that are snatched up, but those that truly love Messiah and keep His Torah.

N




There is to be a "snatching up", but it will not be Christians that are snatched up, but those that truly love Messiah and keep His Torah.


have you ever notice this does not make sense.


The Disciples were called christinas them selfs


Acts 11:26 (Amplified Bible)
Amplified Bible (AMP)

Copyright © 1954, 1958, 1962, 1964, 1965, 1987 by The Lockman Foundation
[AMP at Lockman] [The Lockman Foundation] [Amplified at Zondervan] [Zondervan]

26And when he had found him, he brought him back to Antioch. For a whole year they assembled together with and [a]were guests of the church and instructed a large number of people; and in Antioch the disciples were first called Christians.




Peter 4:16 (Amplified Bible)
Amplified Bible (AMP)

Copyright © 1954, 1958, 1962, 1964, 1965, 1987 by The Lockman Foundation
[AMP at Lockman] [The Lockman Foundation] [Amplified at Zondervan] [Zondervan]

16But if [one is ill-treated and suffers] as a Christian [which he is contemptuously called], let him not be ashamed, but give glory to God that he is [deemed worthy to suffer] in this name.



I would think true christians would worship yah in spirit and truth.


I believe true faith bears good fruit as Yeshua taught. true believers will always bear good fruit.


I do not believe one can have salvation and just not do anything. faith without works are dead and if our faith is dead what about salvation? we are saved by grace through faith.

I'm not saying works saved No we would be in deep do doo because if we break one law we break all.


It just I think true salvation will produce fruit think about it Yah will never allow a true believer to be like a tree in winter time with no leaves if you get what I'm trying to say.
Offline Robskiwarrior  
#9 Posted : Sunday, February 3, 2008 9:58:09 PM(UTC)
Robskiwarrior
Joined: 7/4/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,470
Man
Location: England

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Sugs - I'm really not being rude or condrasending when I say this but I think in most of your posts you are missing the point :) I would recommend you read the books affiliated with this discussion forum:

Yada Yahweh
Future History
The Owners Manual

If we were to explain exactly what was going on in our heads about most of these topics, we would have to write 3 documents, probably called Yada Yahweh, Future History and The Owners Manual, and that would not fit into a single forum post :) Plus, the mod team would have to read it... ;)

The idea of the forums if for discussion of course, and that includes setting the record straight where it is bent. A lot of us in hear have come from Christian backgrounds we we know what the arguments are because we have been where you are, but we also know that most of the Christian arguments miss the point. If you are able to read these it would help in your understanding of what we are, even if you do not agree. Plus you would be able to build a better argument :)

No one is saying, not even the authors, that these books are the absolute truth - but they do help open a dialogue. If you can prove any part of them wrong, we would be very happy to hear it, and I know the authors would be also happy to hear about any errors.

As a group of people here I know that we are passed being spoon-fed the truth, and most of us have done either some or a load of research into what we are now thinking.

I hope you will have chance to read these and see where we are coming from :)

- Robski
Signature Updated! Woo that was old...
Offline shalom82  
#10 Posted : Sunday, February 3, 2008 10:02:05 PM(UTC)
shalom82
Joined: 9/10/2007(UTC)
Posts: 735
Location: Penna

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Boy

I am nearly all raptured out. I don't know what else to say. I am fatigued by the constant back and forth. I am not trying to be a party pooper or a jerk or anything else for that matter...it's just that my stomach hurts. I am almost to the point where I think to myself if it's true...I get harpazoed..great...it it's not true...and I get my head cut off...that's fine too. I don't know how this is coming across...but I am tired...I don't know much...but I know Yahuweh gave me a history and a memory that makes me realize I am in relationship with him...and at least as I type a few more seconds to get to know him better and appreciate him just a smidgen more. Boy, I really really really hope this doesn't come off as self righteous...or as one of those posts that hijack the moral highground that makes people want to strangle the author for his...pretentious...moi? attitude...but all it is meant to be is honest...I'm just fatigued.

Shalom Aleichem
YHWH's ordinances are true, and righteous altogether.
Offline sugarman  
#11 Posted : Sunday, February 3, 2008 10:09:56 PM(UTC)
sugarman
Joined: 2/3/2008(UTC)
Posts: 67

Robskiwarrior wrote:
Sugs - I'm really not being rude or condrasending when I say this but I think in most of your posts you are missing the point :) I would recommend you read the books affiliated with this discussion forum:

Yada Yahweh
Future History
The Owners Manual

If we were to explain exactly what was going on in our heads about most of these topics, we would have to write 3 documents, probably called Yada Yahweh, Future History and The Owners Manual, and that would not fit into a single forum post :) Plus, the mod team would have to read it... ;)

The idea of the forums if for discussion of course, and that includes setting the record straight where it is bent. A lot of us in hear have come from Christian backgrounds we we know what the arguments are because we have been where you are, but we also know that most of the Christian arguments miss the point. If you are able to read these it would help in your understanding of what we are, even if you do not agree. Plus you would be able to build a better argument :)

No one is saying, not even the authors, that these books are the absolute truth - but they do help open a dialogue. If you can prove any part of them wrong, we would be very happy to hear it, and I know the authors would be also happy to hear about any errors.

As a group of people here I know that we are passed being spoon-fed the truth, and most of us have done either some or a load of research into what we are now thinking.

I hope you will have chance to read these and see where we are coming from :)

- Robski



what point am I missing?



Matthew 7:16 (Amplified Bible)
Amplified Bible (AMP)

Copyright © 1954, 1958, 1962, 1964, 1965, 1987 by The Lockman Foundation
[AMP at Lockman] [The Lockman Foundation] [Amplified at Zondervan] [Zondervan]

16You will [a]fully recognize them by their fruits. Do people pick grapes from thorns, or figs from thistles?


I mean do you believe one can be saved but not show any fruits? I mean are not the fruit of the spirit the evidence of salvation?




atthew 3:10 (Amplified Bible)
Amplified Bible (AMP)

Copyright © 1954, 1958, 1962, 1964, 1965, 1987 by The Lockman Foundation
[AMP at Lockman] [The Lockman Foundation] [Amplified at Zondervan] [Zondervan]

10And already the ax is lying at the root of the trees; every tree therefore that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.


like I said i do not believe works saved No but I 100 percent believe the holy spirit will make us a new creation and will puts desires for us to do good.
Offline Robskiwarrior  
#12 Posted : Sunday, February 3, 2008 10:19:38 PM(UTC)
Robskiwarrior
Joined: 7/4/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,470
Man
Location: England

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
sugarman wrote:



what point am I missing?



Matthew 7:16 (Amplified Bible)
Amplified Bible (AMP)

Copyright © 1954, 1958, 1962, 1964, 1965, 1987 by The Lockman Foundation
[AMP at Lockman] [The Lockman Foundation] [Amplified at Zondervan] [Zondervan]

16You will [a]fully recognize them by their fruits. Do people pick grapes from thorns, or figs from thistles?


I mean do you believe one can be saved but not show any fruits? I mean are not the fruit of the spirit the evidence of salvation?



Sorry - I was speaking in general :) I'm just trying to give you the tools to argue with us better that's all :) We like people who ask awkward questions, but most of the answers we would give you would be from one of the books... Plus everything is so linked up together its hard to give an answer on one point without opening the whole can. I am saying it would be better if you read the books, even if its like a chapter or whatever at a time, you would be able to see a little more about who we are - then you will be able to put your point across better :)

On amplifications of the bible, they aren't really that amplified... There is a good amplification though that is in progress, if you like to use amplified versions. You can find it HERE
Signature Updated! Woo that was old...
Offline bitnet  
#13 Posted : Sunday, February 3, 2008 10:40:54 PM(UTC)
bitnet
Joined: 7/3/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,120

Aaahh, yes, shalom82,

Rest, take a breather, brother, and have some peace and a cuppa cha'. Struggle not with things that may not affect you in one way or another. This issue has been getting much attention since it was raised over a century ago, and if one century of discussion by academics and clerics cannot clear the air, how can a few posts on an obscure website do it? Que sera sera.

Well, we do know that we have the Power of the Set-Apart Spirit and that is a tremendous bonus already as far as understanding goes. So when we look at the pieces of the puzzle again, it seems that a group of believers shall be taken away to mark the beginning of the Tribulation, and then throughout the Tribulation and Great Tribulation many shall die as believers, and that some shall live to see the day Yahushua MessiYah returns to earth. Therefore , when that moment happens, those who are dead in MessiYah Yahushua shall be resurrected, and those who are alive shall be caught up with them. Those removed earlier at the beginning of the Tribulation shall then join them all from one end of the heavens to the other. Can it not be such? Would it contradict Scripture or would it fulfill all verses? The simplicity of this may be the answer we all seek.

In the end would it really matter? Not unless you intend to plan your end-days' strategy for the worst case scenario like the Americans and their nuclear bunkers. That effort would really make your stomach churn.
The reverence of Yahweh is the beginning of Wisdom.
Offline sugarman  
#14 Posted : Sunday, February 3, 2008 11:02:08 PM(UTC)
sugarman
Joined: 2/3/2008(UTC)
Posts: 67

Robskiwarrior wrote:


Sorry - I was speaking in general :) I'm just trying to give you the tools to argue with us better that's all :) We like people who ask awkward questions, but most of the answers we would give you would be from one of the books... Plus everything is so linked up together its hard to give an answer on one point without opening the whole can. I am saying it would be better if you read the books, even if its like a chapter or whatever at a time, you would be able to see a little more about who we are - then you will be able to put your point across better :)

On amplifications of the bible, they aren't really that amplified... There is a good amplification though that is in progress, if you like to use amplified versions. You can find it HERE


What you mean. 'in general'? I was refering to the post that said Christians will not go up in the rapture.

I was refering to that part of the post.

I believe true followers of Yah are Christians and that in times since Yahshua people have come in wolves clothing and started to teaching the doctrines of men. But true Christians being Christ-like know what to watch out for.

As for Catholism etc.... I do not agree with many things but I willl not say some of them are not truly saved as it's not my place to judge their heart.

For me I do my best to keep Yahshua's commands. "Christian" to me is a title but this title can only refer to people true to Yahshua's teachings.

I do my best to put Yahshua's teaching into action everday but it's not easy. The path to Yah is not going to always be smooth.

Edited by user Monday, February 4, 2008 4:57:26 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Offline bitnet  
#15 Posted : Monday, February 4, 2008 4:05:27 AM(UTC)
bitnet
Joined: 7/3/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,120

Sugarman,

I'd re-look at how you define your faith. I would suggest that you read the books on this web site properly before you make certain conclusions that shall not hold up in a discussion on the many threads here. There is actually a thread and a poll on whether you would call yourself a Christian. Read it. But read YY first in its entirety. Take your time, but hurry up! :-)

Peace!
The reverence of Yahweh is the beginning of Wisdom.
Offline sugarman  
#16 Posted : Monday, February 4, 2008 9:13:53 AM(UTC)
sugarman
Joined: 2/3/2008(UTC)
Posts: 67

bitnet wrote:
Sugarman,

I'd re-look at how you define your faith. I would suggest that you read the books on this web site properly before you make certain conclusions that shall not hold up in a discussion on the many threads here. There is actually a thread and a poll on whether you would call yourself a Christian. Read it. But read YY first in its entirety. Take your time, but hurry up! :-)

Peace!



I been reading but why is it bad to call your self a christian?



Christian in greek means christ-like, so I thought to be truly christ-like (christian) you need to follow yeshua and what he teaches.


From read those sites he even use the word christian to describe gentiles and paul that follow Yeshua.


what about the verses in the bible that says if you suffer being called a christian be glad you suffer in that name?


Also The law those sites say we should keep them but what ones?


I mean I read thsoe sites that say be fair to your emplayess and when doing Business etc..... and the food laws but what others?


Offline sugarman  
#17 Posted : Monday, February 4, 2008 9:45:34 AM(UTC)
sugarman
Joined: 2/3/2008(UTC)
Posts: 67

Swalchy wrote:


Whilst Christianos certainly means to be Christ-like, the Greek Christos which we transliterated into Christ actually means to be drugged, to whitewash, to colour, to sting, and to smear.

Christos is not an apt word to call the Messiah, so to be "Christ-like" isn't exactly a good thing.


Can you please give a reference for Christ meaning to drugged whitewash etc.... i can not find that in my greek lexicon.

This is what I can find

haima hah'-ee-mah of uncertain derivation; blood, literally (of men or animals), figuratively (the juice of grapes) or specially (the atoning blood of Christ); by implication, bloodshed, also kindred:--blood


apostolos ap-os'-tol-os from 649; a delegate; specially, an ambassador of the Gospel; officially a commissioner of Christ ("apostle") (with miraculous powers):--apostle, messenger, he that is sent.

archiereus ar-khee-er-yuce' from 746 and 2409; the high-priest (literally, of the Jews, typically, Christ); by extension a chief priest:--chief (high) priest, chief of the priests.

Baptistes bap-tis-tace' from 907; a baptizer, as an epithet of Christ's forerunner:--Baptist.


dikaiosis dik-ah'-yo-sis from 1344; aquittal (for Christ's sake):--justification.

Emmanouel em-man-oo-ale' of Hebrew origin (6005); God with us; Emmanuel, a name of Christ:--Emmanuel.

epiphaneia ep-if-an'-i-ah from 2016; a manifestation, i.e. (specially) the advent of Christ (past or future):--appearing, brightness.

logos log'-os from 3004; something said (including the thought); by implication, a topic (subject of discourse), also reasoning (the mental faculty) or motive; by extension, a computation; specially, (with the article in John) the Divine Expression (i.e. Christ):--account, cause, communication, X concerning, doctrine, fame, X have to do, intent, matter, mouth, preaching, question, reason, + reckon, remove, say(-ing), shew, X speaker, speech, talk, thing, + none of these things move me, tidings, treatise, utterance, word, work.

Messias mes-see'-as of Hebrew origin (4899); the Messias (i.e. Mashiach), or Christ:--Messias.

Messias mes-see'-as of Hebrew origin (4899); the Messias (i.e. Mashiach), or Christ:--Messias.


http://www.eliyah.com/cg...xicon&isindex=Christ


more on that link do not feel like posting all the meansing for Christ
Offline kp  
#18 Posted : Monday, February 4, 2008 9:59:06 AM(UTC)
kp
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,030
Location: Palmyra, VA

sugarman, I'm afraid you've come in very late on a long running conversation. Here's the scoop, and it all has to do with semantics: the earliest NT manuscripts use a placeholder for "Christ" which was, in post-Constantinian manuscripts, presumed to mean the Greek word "Christos" and rendered as such. If that's true, I've got no problem with it. But Yada (the author of Yada Yahweh---kind of a "must read" if you're going to converse with the folks in this forum) traces the word not to Christos (meaning "anointed") but chrisos, meaning "drugged or whitewashed." One is obviously the derivative of the other, and they aren't the same thing at all.

The translators could have headed off the problems if they'd only done what they should have done---translated (instead of transliterating) the word (whatever it actually was) to "the Anointed One." But they didn't. So we're left with a problem. Are "Christ" and the derivative "Christian" legitimate words, or are they not? I write for an audience presumed to be nominally "Christian," so in the absence of hard evidence to the contrary, I use the word as most people would understand it---as you understand it, I gather. Even I, however, prefer "Messiah" or Anointed. But the vast majority of people who would call themselves "Christians" are not believers in the Biblical sense. Rather, they are followers of the "religion of Christianity," having no relationship with "Christ" (that is, Yahshua, the Messiah, the Son of God) at all.

Bottom line---we've gotta define our terms, 'cause we're not all speaking the same dialect here.

kp
Offline sugarman  
#19 Posted : Monday, February 4, 2008 10:12:29 AM(UTC)
sugarman
Joined: 2/3/2008(UTC)
Posts: 67

kp wrote:
sugarman, I'm afraid you've come in very late on a long running conversation. Here's the scoop, and it all has to do with semantics: the earliest NT manuscripts use a placeholder for "Christ" which was, in post-Constantinian manuscripts, presumed to mean the Greek word "Christos" and rendered as such. If that's true, I've got no problem with it. But Yada (the author of Yada Yahweh---kind of a "must read" if you're going to converse with the folks in this forum) traces the word not to Christos (meaning "anointed") but chrisos, meaning "drugged or whitewashed." One is obviously the derivative of the other, and they aren't the same thing at all.

The translators could have headed off the problems if they'd only done what they should have done---translated (instead of transliterating) the word (whatever it actually was) to "the Anointed One." But they didn't. So we're left with a problem. Are "Christ" and the derivative "Christian" legitimate words, or are they not? I write for an audience presumed to be nominally "Christian," so in the absence of hard evidence to the contrary, I use the word as most people would understand it---as you understand it, I gather. Even I, however, prefer "Messiah" or Anointed. But the vast majority of people who would call themselves "Christians" are not believers in the Biblical sense. Rather, they are followers of the "religion of Christianity," having no relationship with "Christ" (that is, Yahshua, the Messiah, the Son of God) at all.

Bottom line---we've gotta define our terms, 'cause we're not all speaking the same dialect here.

kp



so what do you call your self then if not christian

as for me I do not really see my personal relating ship with Yah a religion


for me His holy spirit always guide me everytime I ask for wisdom and guidance
Offline shalom82  
#20 Posted : Monday, February 4, 2008 11:21:13 AM(UTC)
shalom82
Joined: 9/10/2007(UTC)
Posts: 735
Location: Penna

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
A Yahudi...one who belongs to Yahuweh..fellowships/communes with Yahuweh...Loves Yahuweh...a praiser of Yah

and sugarman just for a perspective that may help you out...many people on this forum have as much distain for Christianity as they do any other religious system. That does not mean we hate Christians or hate the basic mere premise of Christianity...that the Elohim of Israel is the true Elohim of this Universe and that He begot His brought forth Word/Son to redeem mankind. But as it is...Christianity adds so much toxicity, lies, and contradictions and seeks to put a yoke on people in the interest of conquering the laity. Since that is the reality as we see it...the reality has convinced the great majority of us that though we love Christians and...how do I put this...are akin to them...that we cannot identify with them....because we do not espouse religion. I think you wrote the answer when you said

Quote:
as for me I do not really see my personal relating ship with Yah a religion


So we decide not to put it in a box that we know is rotting, leaking and decrepit


YHWH imakhem

Shalom
YHWH's ordinances are true, and righteous altogether.
Offline bitnet  
#21 Posted : Monday, February 4, 2008 8:15:51 PM(UTC)
bitnet
Joined: 7/3/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,120

Hello Sugarman,

My brothers here are explaining to you much of which has been lost to those professing traditional Christianity. Many of us came out from there. And some from Judaism. And we do it willingly with our eyes open. It is not because we hate Christians or Jews per se, but we realise that the religions of Christianity and Judaism binds us to authorities that do not want us to do what our Creator wants us to do: believe in Yahweh and obey Him!

I ask you, before you came to this site, when you said The Lord's Prayer, whom did you pray to? "Our Father in Heaven, Holy be Your Name.." Has your church taught you the name of the Father? Do they use the name of the Father in reverence? If not, who then is your Father if you do not know His Name? As religions, Christianity and Judaism has devolved into silly rituals that actually demean Truth and the reason for our existence and our relationship with our Creator. Worse yet, these religions profess the Creator but deny His name! Furthermore, the authorities of these religions deny the followers access to the Creator! They constantly teach others to break the very rules that we are all supposed to follow. In fact, they bind the minds of men and women into submitting to their authority instead of the Divine. Religion means exactly that: Origin: 1150–1200; ME religioun (< OF religion) < L religiōn- (s. of religiō) conscientiousness, piety, equiv. to relig(āre) to tie, fasten (re- re- + ligāre to bind, tie; cf. ligament) + -iōn- -ion; cf. rely). Religion ties you down! But Yahushua came to give us freedom!

Many of us on this site do not profess a "religion" but we now walk in the Way of Yahushua. We understand Yahweh's plan for us. We accept our position as sinners, and the need of The Sacrifice for us. But we stop short of calling ourselves "Christians" unless it is expedient for the benefit of the other person. (We become like Romans so that we can talk to them... but not do as them. Get it?)

So, again, terminology is important in this site and some of us have moved on to deeper levels of understanding and it may be confusing for someone new. Forgive us. But trust us, we only have each other's interests at heart. Should one of us step out of line, some here will tell us. But we discuss much. And learn much. And you are most welcome to learn. But most learning is done by listening first, then asking. And when on this site, it means reading first, then asking. Hope this clarifies what I said earlier about reading the information on Yada Yahweh. Those are amplifications, workbooks of The Word. It is not set in stone but sure hits heavier than the biggest obelisk found to date! So read it, many answers are already there, ponder, then come back with questions. Is this agreeable? Yahweh willing, we shall be around for a while more. But take your time, and hurry up!

Peace and Blessings!

By the way, some of us here are learning a little Hebrew (and perhaps Yiddish) because it helps us understand Scripture better and helps us connect with some of the remnant of Yahweh's chosen people. Don't be fazed by it as it is mostly for comradeship. Shalom Aleichem!
The reverence of Yahweh is the beginning of Wisdom.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.