KM wrote: Alrighty then...so you folks don't accept the New Covenant or Jesus Christ....is that it???
It’s not as black and white as that.
First there is no New Covenant. There is a Renewal of the Covenant coming up, but there is only one covenant.
If God were to change and create a New covenant, then he would not be reliable. There can be no New Covenant, Yahowah has but one Covenant, and like Him it is unchanging.
Yah said His Covenant was for all time, so if he were to do away with it, and create a New one he would be liar and thus untrustworthy.
And if you read Jeremiah 23, the only place it is spoken of, you will see that the only difference between now and the renewal of the covenant, is that the Towrah will be written on our hearts. So nothing changes.
KM wrote: Sorry...either God is incapable of controlling what is canonized as being His written Word...or you folks are bad wrong by rejecting portions of God's Word.
Boy is this circular reasoning at its finest.
Who canonized the bible?? Do you know? It wasn’t God, it was men. God never canonized anything. If you look at what God as Yahowsha said was Scripture, then it is the Tanakh, not anything in the “New Testament” which wasn’t written at the time of His life on Earth.
Yahowah however did give us a way to determine if something someone claims comes from Him acctully does, it’s found in Deuteronomy in the 18th chapter. That is the criteria I use to determine what is Scripture.
KM wrote: So, having said that and considering you reject the Apostle Paul and claim he is of the devil (this claim says God is incapable of controlling what is canonized as being His written Word...this is in fact a satanic accusation against God Himself!) I won't be reading anything by Yada as he is in fact a false teacher sowing discord among the brethren.
In QP we put the Paul to the Deuteronomy 18 test, and found Him failing.
If you were to take the time to view the evidence presented there you might realize that it is in fact Paul whop was the false teacher.
If you have no interest in reading the evidence, then leave, we don’t want you around because you have no interest in understanding.