logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

8 Pages«<34567>»
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Matthew  
#201 Posted : Tuesday, April 5, 2011 1:14:47 PM(UTC)
Matthew
Joined: 10/3/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,191
Man
Location: São Paulo, Brazil

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
H wrote:
You are terrorising non-beleivers with your activities and please stop this childish act.


Man that's funny! I wonder what's his definition of Muslim terrorist acts then?
Offline James  
#202 Posted : Thursday, April 14, 2011 7:59:26 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
NJ wrote:
The Lord be with you. Not sure what are your motives behind researching
and writing you have written concerning the background of Islam. But
must admit your research is an excellent work. All the Islamic resource
books you have mentioned are on my bookshelves and I confirm what you
have written. I have been a quite student of Islam for very many years.
In fact started writing too but only published one book with a
co-author, 'Partners or Prisoners'. But then my path went into a
different direction. I am now just a humble servant of Christ and small
minister of the gospel. I use even the Qur'an to bring people to the
light of Christ. May the Lord of the universe use your research to set
people free from the darkness.
In Christ's Service

NJ


Yada wrote:
NJ,

I appreciate your validation of Prophet of Doom. Thank you.

I wrote it because God asked me to.

I have attached an unfinished draft of my most recent book, an Introduction to God. There you will discover that:

God hates being called "the Lord."
God's name is Yahowah.
Gospel is a pagan term.
Yahowah's teaching is found in the Towrah.
There is no Scriptural basis for "Christ."
Yahowsha's title is ha Ma'aseyah.

The religion of Christianity has corrupted Yahowah's Word.

My prayer is that you find the attached book more useful and revealing than Prophet of Doom, and that you share what you learn.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#203 Posted : Thursday, April 14, 2011 8:01:03 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
KA wrote:
Hello,

I am a European (Belgian) woman who sees islam getting more and more influence over daily life around here. I want to help put a stop to that and inform our government and policy makers better about the threat of islam. Therefore, among others, I am translating parts of your website. I don’t yet have a website of my own but will certainly let you know the link when I do. I first have to gather the right material and translate it, possibly in French too.

Is it allowed to translate your POD Qur’an (with acknowledgements of course) and Khomeini’s Little Green Book ?

Thanks beforehand for your reply and keep up the good work !

KA


Yada wrote:
KA,

You have my permission and encouragement to translate anything found on the Prophet of Doom site including the book itself. You do not need to credit me with any of it, yet you are free to do so if you wish.

There may already be translations of the Little Green Book. It's actually popular in spite of its gross stupidity and immorality. Our webmaster simply converted a printed text, of which there were several, to HTML for the site. We posted it under the Fair Use Doctrine in the US whereby the public has a right to know.

I appreciate your willingness to engage in this battle.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#204 Posted : Thursday, April 14, 2011 8:05:36 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
AM wrote:
Hello,

This book should be in every Library across the country, but it has to be available with library bindings. I will ask my library to purchase it. Without a library binding, however, they will have an excuse not to. They probably have packaging guidelines for audio disks as well.

You should contact the only library outsource vendor LSSI, which is taking over libraries all over the country, to order your book for their libraries. It would be interesting to find out if they will censor it. They will require library bindings as well.

http://www.lssi.com/contact.html

I would be interested in listening to an audio version. I almost never read hard copy any more (my eyes aren't what they were) I prefer unabridged books to abridged, however, many audio books are published both ways. I think some of the quotations might be difficult to understand, since so many include parenthesis or aside explanations.

Incorporate as a non-profit educational organization. It's easy to do yourself and costs very little. People who buy your book(s) can claim part of the cost as a tax deduction. You can also accept tax exempt donations.

You need to create a "press release" which is an ad for the book that newspapers and web sites can use as news. In it you put your picture and a way to contact you. You can distribute it to have people send to their local stations and newspapers.

RTIR is a company that will send your info to talk shows (not cheap and I never used them), but they will also send you, among other things, an information booklet entitled "39 ways to sell your book through radio-TV talk show publicity". The second link is ratings by people who have used the service.

http://www.rtir.com
http://www.speakernetnews.com/post/rtir.html


Your site says that if (I am) interested in saving America and Israel from Islam... Including Israel makes it sound like you have an agenda. Perhaps you could add something to mitigate that. It's hard for some people to realize that Israel is sitting in front of a steam roller called Islam. They are Americas' foothold to the middle east, as England was to Europe during the WWs. Israel must be saved for political reasons, even if one hates Jews and Israel.

Think of enlisting the interest of atheists. Your book compares (what little I read on your site) islam to christianity and links atheists with communism, in some readers' minds.

However, atheists may be your biggest advocates. At this time, they are fighting the takeover of American government by christians unaware that they may have a bigger battle on their hands with muslims. Perhaps they should start directing their energy towards islam. PS Atheists are not communists, though some communists are atheists and christians and muslims.

Best,
AM



Yada wrote:
AM,

Thank you for your letter.

We have sold every hardback copy of Prophet of Doom so there is nothing left for a library to purchase. Moreover, making the entire book available free online is actually better. Millions of people around the world have read it as a result.

The MP3 version of the book is also free online. You can listen on your computer or transfer the files to a CD. The audio version is unabridged.

We have considered filing for non-profit status since we derive no income from anything we do, but the annual reporting is a bigger burden than we wanted to accept.

During the first five years after Tea with Terrorists and Prophet of Doom were published we wrote and distributed hundreds of press releases to every talk radio and tv station and program in the nation. As a result of them I did over 2000 hours of talk radio programs to promote the books and site.

Athiests have been hugely supportive of Prophet of Doom. But some, those who favor political correctness, have been critical. And while not all athiests are Communists / Socialists, most are, especially in China and Europe.

Israel isn't America's foothold in the Middle East. America as a government has long since turned our backs on Israel in favor of the OPECers. But Israel will be for WWIII as Czechoslovakia was for WWII. And if I'm right, the fate of the world depends upon Israel. And yet based upon the US arms sales to Muslim dictators, I'm convinced that only Yahowah can and will save Yisra'el. A united Islamic attack on the nation supported as it would be by the rivals Iran and Saudi Arabia, would now prevail without divine intervention.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#205 Posted : Sunday, April 24, 2011 6:02:57 PM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
Muhammad wrote:
I take it you are Christian/Jewish, I am going to keep this E-Mail concise.
You call yourself Christian/Jewish and write a Hateful book against Islam - which is full of lies. Let me give you an example of how you manipulate and change Verses of the Qur'an:
You said: Qur’an:8:57 “If you gain mastery over them in battle, inflict such a defeat as would terrorize them, so that they would learn a lesson and be warned.”
Actual Verse: If ye gain the mastery over them in war, disperse, with them, those who follow them, that they may remember.

What a difference. Your not a Jew, just a corporate pig trying to make money out of an interesting book the nation will want to read, and why wouldn't an Anti-Islamic nation want to read an ANti-Islamic book? Your a disgrace to Jews, your information is false you are full of deceit, if you want me to show you some horrendous quotes from your own book e-mail me back - if your man enough.

Your a pathetic coward who leads a sad life, your relgion is terrorism and zionism is the disease. You are commanded to lie to Non-Jews and fight a long campaign against these 'filthy' creatures but I assure you that you and your relgion are the filth contaminating this planet. I'll see you burning in hell.


Yada wrote:
Muhammad,

Pride is what got Allah into trouble. It is the basis of AllahuAkbar - Allah is Greater. Pride has blinded you as well.

Relying upon pride in your faith, you failed to even read the book you are criticizing. That is an embarrassing thing to do. If you had read the book, you would have known that I'm not a Christian, nor am I Jewish. But, unaware of the evidence brought to bear in Prophet of Doom, unable to refute its message, you've stooped to attempting to slander the messenger. That is an ignorant, thoughtless, and irrational approach. But it is all too common for those beguiled by religion.

The 8th surah of the Qur'an is a grotesquely immoral war manifesto. To support it makes you immoral.

There are dozens of translations of the 57th verse. The five most highly regarded read:
57.
AA If you meet them in battle, inflict on them such a defeat as would be a lesson for those who come after them, and that they may be warned.
NQ So if you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson.
PK If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember.
SH Therefore if you overtake them in fighting, then scatter by (making an example of) them those who are in their rear, that they may be mindful.
YU If ye gain the mastery over them in war, disperse, with them, those who follow them, that they may remember.

In the 15th chapter of Prophet of Doom, called War Made a Profit and a Prophet, I cover the entirety of the Spoils of War surah. Concerning the 57th verse, I wrote:

These are some of the most chilling words ever uttered in the name of god: Qur'an 8:57 "If you gain mastery over them in battle, inflict such a defeat as would terrorize them, so that they would learn a lesson and be warned." It’s pretty hard to reconcile these words with the Islam-is-a-peace-loving-religion myth. This sounds like one of al-Qaeda's speeches to me. The Sira presents the "Terror Manifesto" this way: Ishaq:326 "If you come upon them, deal with them so forcibly as to terrify those who would follow them that they may be warned. Make a severe example of them by terrorizing Allah’s enemies."

This translation is therefore consistent with the Hadith and five most respected Islamic translations of the Qur'an. What's inconsistent is the revisionist translation you chose to use as if it was "the actual verse." So it is you who has manipulated the message. It is you who has changed the verses of the Qur'an.

The Qur'an itself is the problem Muhammad. It is filled with lies. It is filled with immoral statements.

The "corporate pig trying to make money" comment reveals more about you and what Islam has done to you, than it does anything else. I have no corporation, and I give Prophet of Doom away for free.

If you were moral, if you were rational, if you were a man with a functioning conscience, you'd admit that you and your religion are wrong. But you can't do that because of your pride.

Millions the world over have read Prophet of Doom. Too bad you weren't one of them.

If you want to see "pathetic," just look at what Islam has done to every nation in which Muslims are a majority. Collectively Islamic nations are the least free, least educated, least prosperous, and most uncivil, most sexist, most repressive and violent places on earth to live. There is a reason 99% of terrorists are Muslims.

Terrorism is a tactic, one deployed almost exclusively by Muslims today, and to a very great degree against Zion. As a Muslim, you are the problem, the perpetrator.

I have no religion. I hate religion. God, whose name is Yahowah has no religion. The real God hates religion.

There are no fires in Hell. It is a lightless prison for those who lead others away for Yahowah. You may end up there if you continue to promote Islam, but you will not see me. But if you end up there, you most certainly will see your god Allah. Hell was conceived and built for him.

Be man enough to read the book Muhammad, and then write me again.

Yada




Mo wrote:
I was suprised when you said 'and to a very great degree against Zion', another supporter of Zion also known as a Zionist I see.

Yada wrote:
Too bad you don't know what Zion means, Muhammad. But you don't know anything about any of the signs Yahowah revealed, which is kind of funny considering that Muhammad and Allah, being impotent, claimed that they produced signs which people denied.

It's too bad that you don't know why God is a supporter of Zion, because if you knew any of these things, you wouldn't be a Muslim.


It is ironic how you accuse Muslims of lying and using violent means to further our Religion. Look at the so called state of Israel using these tactics in todays world. It will suprise you to know that I am only 13 :)

Yada wrote:
I'm not surprised. It takes very little Islam to destroy a person's ability to be moral and to think rationally. And Muslims never mature. So age is irrelevant.

As for lying, it's considered a good thing according to Allah and a bad thing according to Yahowah. Your confusion over who is lying and who is telling the truth is a direct result of Islam having corrupted you.


But I know my way around Islam and whatever lies you want to use against me. Before you say that I have been brainwashed by my parents or Imam you should know my parents were not religious but I became religious from reading the Qur'an and I follow only the Qur'an. I invite you to post whatever I say on your website, and this is a challenge to see if you are man enough to do it. I mean what could a 13 year old possibly do to you?

Yada wrote:
That's funny O prideful child. Prophet of Doom is comprised of 5000 quotations from the oldest and most highly regarded Islamic sources, all of which prove that Muhammad was a sexual pervert and a ruthless terrorist. If you are so smart, explain why all five of the most reliable Islamic sources confirm that your prophet was among the most immoral and violent men to have ever lived--and a liar to boot.

Religion is the curse of humankind. So to say that you are religious is to say that you are cursed.

It is easy to see how you'd become religious by reading the Qur'an. That is the Qur'an's purpose. That is why Islam means "submission."

The real God, Yahowah, hates religion. All He wants is a Covenant Relationship.

You cannot be a Muslim by only following the Qur'an. The Qur'an orders you to follow Muhammad's example and Muhammad's orders. That is not possible without the Hadith. Moreover, all five of Islam's Pillars are derivatives of the Hadith, not the Qur'an. You don't know as much as you think you know. But such is the curse of pride.

Your last letter was posted in the Forum at Yada Yahweh. This one will be posted as well. Your letter reinforces what Islam has done to your ability to think rationally. That said, your prideful taunt is one of the most common and repulsive aspects of your religion. Muslims, even as children come to mimic the arrogant fallen spirit they have been beguiled into believing is God.



I am short of time so if you want me to back up whatever I have said with proof then just say and I will do it. You use different translations of the Qur'an to say that they all agree but they don't. The translation are not accurate, but you wouldn't understand since you do not know Arabic and you have relied on these corrupt translations which makes your information corrupt.

Yada wrote:
The five most highly regarded translations of the Qur'an agree with the most highly regarded Hadith translation of the passage, and with my translation in Prophet of Doom. Your failure to admit that does not change this reality.

Actually, I know Arabic (a Hebrew word) and the Qur'an (another Hebrew word) better than most of those beguiled by Islam (another Hebrew word) because I know Hebrew. Virtually every significant word in the Qur'an is Hebrew because Muhammad twisted Talmud stories to create the Qur'an, and because Arabic was derived from Christian Syriac which was derived from Aramaic, which is very similar to Hebrew.

As for the five translations I shared with you, they are considered by Islamic scholars to be the most accurate and reputable. They were all created by the foremost Muslim paleo-Arabic scholars. And speaking of paleo-Arabic, it is as different from MSA as Latin is from Italian. Speaking Arabic today is of almost no value when it comes to understanding the original text of the Qur'an.


You said:
"If you gain mastery over them in battle, inflict such a defeat as would terrorize them, so that they would learn a lesson and be warned."

You used the word 'Terrorize' when it did not even appear in the Arabic copy of the Qur'an so youjust added your own words in.

Yada wrote:
"Inflict on them such a defeat as would be a lesson for those who come after them" is a textbook definition of terror. So is: "punish them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them." Dealing with people in such a way as to "deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them" is once again the explicit purpose of terror. Moreover, the oldest extant presentation of this verse is found in Ishaq, which says that it reads: "If you come upon them, deal with them so forcibly as to terrify those who would follow them that they may be warned. Make a severe example of them by terrorizing Allah’s enemies." (Ishaq:326) Therefore, "inflicting such a defeat as would terrorize them" is the best possible way to correctly convey and unify these translations.
AA If you meet them in battle, inflict on them such a defeat as would be a lesson for those who come after them, and that they may be warned.
NQ So if you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson.
PK If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember.
SH Therefore if you overtake them in fighting, then scatter by (making an example of) them those who are in their rear, that they may be mindful.
YU If ye gain the mastery over them in war, disperse, with them, those who follow them, that they may remember.



I could bring black and white quotes out of your Book as to show you the root of all Terrorism and corruption of Mankind. But you don't go into 'Comparative Scripture arguments'. Most of your response in the E-Mail was you just calling Muslims 'terrorists' and trying to slander me by saying I have been decieved by Allah and other rubbish. Where is the proof? Please don't give me meaningless responses.

Yada wrote:
Go ahead child. Lash out against Yahowah. See if you as a child of the Devil can outwit God.

But before you engage in this way, O prideful one, you may want to consider the fact that your wannabe god claims to have inspired the Torah and Prophets. So, this is a lose lose game for you.

It is a statement of fact child to say that 99% of terrorist acts today are perpetrated by Muslims. Should you be ignorant of this, read the 1000 pages of proof in the Islamic Terrorism Timeline--free on the site. What I prove in Prophet of Doom using exclusively Islamic sources is that Muhammad was a terrorist. That is a fact which cannot be denied either.

By saying that I have not proved that you have been deceived, what you are admitting is that you have not read Prophet of Doom, where Allah and Muhammad prove this conclusion quite nicely. So, please read the book, and you will find 1000 pages of meaningful proof.



As to the actual quote it means that Defeat the Enemy so they leave you alone. As a matter of protection and not aggression, you clearly do not understand this older form of English. Thats the only meaningful respone in your reply and now I have answered that theres nothing more for me to say.

Yada wrote:
That is not the context of the 8th surah, nor is your defensive ploy consistent with Muhammad's 75 aggressive terrorist raids. The 8th surah tells the story of Muhammad going out on a terrorist raid to rob defenseless civilians. He was into stealing, not protection. Ultimately that is why Prophet of Doom is so valuable. It uses the five most respected and oldest Hadith sources to rearrange the Qur'an chronologically and to set it into the context of Muhamamd's life. As is the case with any book, this is the only way to actually understand it.


You don't even have any Book or sign of God to use to prove his existence.

Yada wrote:
Actually the opposite is true. Read the first volume of Yada Yahweh. It's also free. Yahowah, unlike Allah, actually proves His existence and the validity of His Word.


Your relgion is not valid but it's just your own opinion which is plainly Stupid.

Yada wrote:
Stupid is not listening. I don't have a religion, Muhammad. I am anti-religious. You are creating a straw man.


All you do is call Allah a demon, Muhammad a terrorist, pedophile, rapist, and some other filthy stuff. Now I ask you to prove it.

Yada wrote:
I have done exactly that. Read www.ProphetOfDoom.net. So now that you have asked me "to prove it" be a man and read the proof. If you do, write me again after you have finished reading Prophet of Doom. If you don't, go bother someone else with your taunts and foolishness.

Yada

Edited by user Monday, April 25, 2011 12:01:42 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline FredSnell  
#206 Posted : Monday, April 25, 2011 2:04:51 AM(UTC)
FredSnell
Joined: 1/29/2011(UTC)
Posts: 874
Location: Houston, Texas

Thanks: 14 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
"There are no fires in Hell. It is a lightless prison for those who lead others away for Yahowah. You may end up there if you continue to promote Islam, but you will not see me. But if you end up there, you most certainly will see your god Allah."...halla!!!!...like, holler...no wonder when their women celebrate a death of an infidel with and the tips of their tongues rattle some nonsense repeatedly...they are just screaming, allah backwards..."halla"...lol. What a repulsive religion. Just as bad or worse than the rest of 'em....Okay, worse since they do all the killing for terrorisms sake and their supreme commander sanctioned it in their unholy book...I could see them as the example of the, missing link...they are waiting to evolve.
Offline FredSnell  
#207 Posted : Wednesday, April 27, 2011 2:25:24 AM(UTC)
FredSnell
Joined: 1/29/2011(UTC)
Posts: 874
Location: Houston, Texas

Thanks: 14 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Is it that muslims do not read their own book, or is it even they themselves only listen to their own preachers (mullahs) and don't do their own due delligence...In their book I happened across this, and it's pretty straight foward, so why all the un-rest, if they follow their book?..Doesn't this state the obvious? I believe the substantive word below is, "decreed."

Quran:
[5:21] "O my people, enter the holy land that GOD has decreed for you, and do not rebel, lest you become losers."

[5:22] They said, "O Moses, there are powerful people in it, and we will not enter it, unless they get out of it. If they get out, we are entering."

[5:23] Two men who were reverent and blessed by GOD said, "Just enter the gate. If you just enter it, you will surely prevail. You must trust in GOD, if you are believers."

Offline James  
#208 Posted : Friday, April 29, 2011 9:37:16 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
M wrote:
Hello,

Thank you for laboring so diligently to compose Prophet of Doom, Yada Yahwey and other works. I discovered POD while searching for an expose’ of Islam and have not been disappointed. Before reaching the end, I became curious about Yada Yahwey and discovered an enormous breech in my already poorly defined paradigm. I’ve always had more questions than answers but am now perplexed with two in particular: How do I introduce Yada Yahwey to my wife (and so many others) in the most palatable manner? And as I have only approached the threshold of Yada Yahwey, how exactly do I reflect His interests in my life?

In earnest gratitude,
M


Yada wrote:
M

Thank you for sharing this.

Prophet of Doom is fairly easy for most American's to assimilate because the evidence is being brought to bear against a religion they know is inspiring terrorism. But the evidence in Yada Yahweh comes from God and destroys the Jewish and Christian religions, and that's much more difficult for most people to accept.

How does one argue with God? And how does one then deal with the enormous disparities between Yah's Word and religious teaching? Since one cannot do either, they typically reject the messenger who confronts them with these problems.

What I have found is that so long as a person is devoutly religious, you cannot help them. You already suspected problems in your paradigm. So you were open to considering the evidence in favor of Yah's paradigm.

Therefore, I always use the same strategy, which is to provide a trigger for questioning. There are thousands of them. The replacement of Yahowah's name, the change of Yahowsha's name, Christmas, Easter, Sunday Worship, proof that the "bible" is unreliable, and Paul's antagonism toward the Torah, are but a few. If you can get your wife to discuss any of these topics with you, she might come to question her religion, which is a prerequisite for understanding.

As for reflecting Yah in your life, God's answer is observing His Word. The more you study it, the more closely you observe it, the more often and more accurately you share it, the more you will be reflecting His interests in your life. And one way to do that is as a husband and father, mirroring His Covenant in the process.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline Richard  
#209 Posted : Friday, April 29, 2011 10:40:43 AM(UTC)
Richard
Joined: 1/19/2010(UTC)
Posts: 695
Man
United States

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 7 post(s)
Yada wrote:
As for reflecting Yah in your life, God's answer is observing His Word. The more you study it, the more closely you observe it, the more often and more accurately you share it, the more you will be reflecting His interests in your life. And one way to do that is as a husband and father, mirroring His Covenant in the process.

Yada



That is wonderful counsel. Would that I had received such direction 40 years ago! For all you young men out there just starting out in adulthood and marriage, "mirroring His Covenant in the process [of being a husband and father]" will reap dividends of peace, harmony, and genuine joy that others of us can only realize any more through imagination. May each of you make choices today that you will not regret later on down the line.

Yahowah bless you.

Richard
Offline James  
#210 Posted : Friday, May 6, 2011 8:02:54 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
m wrote:
You should be ashamed seriously, I read the Qur'an and you are twisting the words of the Qur'an to suit your own needs. You are are bad as the terrorists exploiting the word of God for their own violent, political and monetary ends. It is ok because in the end you will have to face God for spreading hate to the world. I am not worried, but you should be. Yes, I am a Muslim and my heart is white so don’t think you can change that with your disgusting accusations. Have a nice day.


Yada wrote:
You should be ashamed, seriously, because Prophet of Doom presents the Qur'an in chronological order and it sets Muhammad's recital into the context of Muhammad's life as detailed in the Hadith and Sunnah. If you had read the book, you would have come to know that the words of the Qur'an were revealed to suit Muhammad's needs and desires.

So by lying, you are as bad a Muhammad.

The Qur'an is not the word of God. It is from Muhammad. If you want to know what God said you will have to read the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms. If you do this, you will discover that Yahowah's testimony is the antithesis of Muhammad's. It is absolute proof that Muhammad lied.

I have already met and faced Yahowah. He Himself asked me to expose and condemn Islam because He hates Muhammad's immoral deception even more than I do. So I am not worried, but you should be.

As a Muslim, your soul is stained by Muhammad's disgusting accusations. Hopefully, one day you will be among the few who come to question the foolishness of your religion and the actual nature of your repulsive prophet, and leave them. Then, and only then, will you be prepared to know and meet Yah.

Have a nice day.

Yada


M wrote:
no you don’t... what you said is not in the one and only qur'an. it’s the word of god through mohammed.. not how he lived not his quotes.... JUST the words in the book. jehovah? are you jewish.. that would explain a lot . and you know what I would like to read the torah.. the bible I have read and was raised catholic so I know all about it. I also don’t recall reading in the bible that mohammed was a liar. what are the deceptions of mohammed? are you saying he came off to be good but really isnt? have you read about pagan arabs in pre-islam? I didn’t leave comments on your site to hate I want to make that clear. I just don’t find your knowledge to be correct so far and I think its bad because it fuels people to hate even more. so you think that your religion is the chosen one and everyone one else is wrong? all three religions it is the same god.. just different messengers and diff ways of practicing. I dont understand the reasons to bash a religion of the same god. that’s all. I have known many good muslims.. they don’t follow the things you said mohammed said. and it would be a terrible thing for them to be attacked by uneducated people because of what you say on the site. that being said I don’t think THE God would want any of us killing each other or hurting each other because of him... its just wrong. thank you for your reply and being civil about it also. I keep an open mind to all things so I do consider what you say. blessed be


Yada wrote:
The Qur'an is the worst book ever written. It exists only to satiate Muhammad's lust for sex, power, and money. It is immoral and inaccurate. It is filled with contradictions.

Yahowah is not Jehovah. Yahowah is God's one and only name.

I am not Jewish, which you would have known if you had actually read the book you are demeaning.

Actually, in the Towrah, Yahowah tells us that anyone who made the claims Muhammad did is a liar--a false prophet. Scripture has a lot to say about Islam, and all of it is condemning.

Catholics demean the Torah, just as Muhammad did. They are no better. You left one foolish religion for another. That's dumber than condemning a book you haven't actually read.

According to the five oldest Islamic sources Muhammad was a rapist, a pedophile, incestuous, a thief, a slave trader, a kidnapper, a mass murderer, and a terrorist. I'd consider those things bad. And both Muhammad and his god openly admit that they are liars. Haven't you read the 9th surah?

Read Prophet of Doom and you will understand that pre-Muslim Arabs were vastly more moral and less violent than post Muslim Arabs.

I don't present "my knowledge" in Prophet of Doom. I present Muhammad's words and deeds as they are presented in Islam's five oldest sources. So, by not reading the book, you are making a fool of yourself with your arguments.

I don't have a religion. You would have known that if you read the book.

Allah, the god of Islam is the antithesis of "the Lord Jesus Christ," the god of Christianity. And the god of Christianity bears no resemblance to the god of Judaism. More important still, Yahowah is unrelated to any religious god. In fact, Yahowah hates every religious god. The message of the Towrah is the antithesis of the message presented in Islam, Christianity, and even Judaism. You have been deceived and played for a fool.

But all hope is not lost. The truth is knowable. If you actually read Prophet of Doom from beginning to end, write me again. If not, stop making a fool of yourself through these letters. I will not waste my time further with you, unless it is to help you after you have invested the time to help yourself by reading what the oldest and most reliable Islamic sources have to say about Muhammad and his creation of Islam.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#211 Posted : Friday, May 6, 2011 8:05:54 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
DJ wrote:
I do hope I have contacted Mr. Yada.

If so, sir, may I say what I have read on the internet was profoundly interesting. You said you were able to "re-order the Qur'an chronologically and set it into the context of Muhammad's life."

May I ask, how were you able to do so? In other words, the information you revealed about how Muhammad's truly was - thief, liar, assassin, mass murderer, terrorist, warmonger, and an unrestrained sexual pervert engaged in pedophilia, incest, and rape. Where was such information found if you don't mind my asking.

I would appreciate it very much if you would oblige me as I am a born-again Christian and part of my ministry is to share the Gospel of Jesus Christ with Muslims.

Thank you so much in advance for your response. I look forward to hearing from you very soon.

Sincerely,
D J


Yada wrote:
D J,

The book explains how I was able to reorder the Qur'an chronologically and then set it into the context of Muhammad's life. The answer is Ishaq's Sira/Biography and Tabari's Ta'rikh/History.

I am sorry that you are a Christian. That religion is no less misguided than Islam. Gospel is a pagan term. No one named "Jesus" lived in the first century. Christ is an errant title and means drugged. God did not and could not die for your sins on a pagan cross. Christmas, Easter, and Sunday worship are entirely pagan.

More important still, the actual Ma'aseyah Yahowsha' did not have a "Gospel" or any message which was unique or new. He was and is the living embodiment of the Towrah. Apart from Yahowah and the Towrah, the life, words, deeds, and sacrifices of the Ma'aseyah Yahowsha' are useless and meaningless.

There is no merit whatsoever in leading someone away from one false religion to another.

Engage in a covenant relationship with Yahowah according to His terms and conditions, and observe His Towrah - Instructions so that you come to know Yah and rely upon the seven step path He has provided home.

Should you be interested in knowing the truth about God, send me a note and I'll introduce Him to you. But fair warning, according to Yahowah and Yahowsha', you will first have to walk away from your religious faith. And that will be very difficult for you since you are engaged promoting it.

This is not what you wanted to hear, D J, but it is what you need to hear.

Yada


DJ wrote:
Respectfully, all I asked is where did you get your information, as I like to refer to sources and resources before I perpetuate anything.

That being said, what I want to hear and need to hear is what I have heard - For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth on Him shall not perish but have everlasting life.

You and no one else is going to tell me Jesus Christ never walked the earth. To say that you don't believe He was the son of God is one thing but to deny His very existence, is not even conversation.

Thank you so much for your prompt response. The information will be greatly valued.

D J


Yada wrote:
D J,

Truthfully, no one, not even God, whose name is Yahowah, can help a religious person. He told you this, but you have chosen not to listen to Him. Until and unless you are willing to question your religious beliefs and consider the countless ways they conflict with Yahowah's Word - His Torah - there are no answers which will be of any value to you. Moreover, according to Yahowah, unless you walk away from your religion, you cannot engage in a relationship with Him. It is that simple. It is that clear. It is that uncompromising.

Yahowsha' told you where to look for answers, but you don't believe Him either.

There was no person named "Jesus" prior to the 17th century, and "Christ" is an errant transliteration of a errant translation of a Hebrew title, and not a last name as you are presenting it. But you are not going to let these irrefutable facts get in the way of your beliefs.

Christianity was conceived to separate Yahowsha' from Yahowah, and the Ma'aseyah's words and deeds from the Towrah, which is why you are using invalid names and references. It is why you are clueless as to how He honored the Torah's promises on Passover, Unleavened Bread, and FirstFruits. It is why you do not observe the path to God Yahowsha' not only observed, but facilitated. You have replaced Yahowah and His Towrah - Instruction with a fictional character and a fictional account based more closely on Dionysus than Yahowsha'.

There is no New Testament. There will never be a new testament. And what we now possess of what is labeled such is hopelessly unreliable. But these too are facts beyond your current capacity to understand, as you are still confused by Babel.

I won't bother you again. But since I serve Yahowah, I am always motivated to expose and condemn religious lies on His behalf so that the few who are willing to listen, who genuinely want to know Him, can come to know, trust, and rely upon Yah. You are not ready or willing. Hopefully, one day, the recognition that there is no Scriptural basis for Jesus, Christ, Christian, Christmas, Easter, Cross, or Sunday Worship, or that Paul's letters are in absolute conflict with God's Word, will trigger a willingness to question your religion and then seek to learn the truth about Yahowah. If that happens, and I pray for your sake that it does, write me again and I will introduce you to Him.

I am deeply sorry for the damage religion has done. You deserve better.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#212 Posted : Friday, May 6, 2011 9:34:09 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
IQ al Rassooli wrote:
Dear Yada

It was wonderful being with you and Dave.

I had the BEST hour talk so far and I am so glad we agreed on everything.

Simple: We have read the same vile script and had to come to the same conclusions.

I have absolutely no doubt that IF you and I appear on LIVE TV for a good hour, we shall CHANGE History!

The time is NOW! All we need is a TV station with 'balls'!

If Jerry can swing it, it will be historical because neither of us pulls punches and we shall go for the jugular instantly! No holds barred!

I am looking forward to receiving the first 500 or so pages of your new book as well as hoping for a repeat talk

May whatever powers be, protect and guide you

Sincerely

IQ


Yada wrote:
IQ,

We agree on this as well. I really enjoyed working with you and would love to do it again. There is great synergy between us. We are vastly more effective in my opinion together than either of us are independently. It was the single most enjoyable and effective hour I've spent on radio--and I've done nearly 2500 hours of it. You are amazing.

I'll send Jerry a line over the weekend telling him about our experience yesterday morning, and encourage him to book us together as opportunities arise. At issue for him will be the fact that we are both uncompromising and irrefutable, and together we would destroy most everything most every host has been telling his audience for years. The truth is equally in conflict with liberal and conservative talk show hosts, politicians, and listeners. So finding a program willing to air this message will be a real challenge. Frankly, I'm not sure anyone other than you, me, and Walid has the courage and compassion to tell it like it is.

I've attached my current draft of the Introduction to God. You'll notice that I'm still adding to existing sections and that they last two sections have not yet been written. But there is more than enough here for you to know what and whom I know.

And should you have questions along the way, please send them to me.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#213 Posted : Monday, May 9, 2011 4:29:05 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
D J has replied to Carig again.

DJ wrote:
I am the one deeply sorry for what Satan has done to your mind. The bible says 'But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost: In whom the god (Satan/devil/adversy) of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.' 2 Cor. 4:4

Yada wrote:
I am not surprised that you have mentioned Satan and based your answer upon 2 Corinthians. In it, Paul not only makes some of the same delusional claims Muhammad made regarding his visit to multiple heavens, he openly acknowledges that he was demon possessed. So it was Satan working through Paul who conceived your religion.

Paul's conversion experience was also Satanic according to Yahowsha' and Yahowah. And that is why Paul, in Acts, attributed Dionysus's most famous quote to the flashing light he experienced. That light was the Whore of Babel. And the goad he spoke of is mentioned again in 2 Corinthians where the connection is made to demon possession. It is the same stinger Yahowsha' warns us about. I prove these points and many more regarding Paul in www.QuestioningPaul.com. While reading it won't save your soul, it will point you in the right direction.

You see, I was once a Christian. I was an ordained ruling elder. I taught evangelism, and I was a trained Stephen's minister. I gave sermons and led bible studies. But, somewhere along the way I came to realize that God cannot be born or die, and that a cross is a pagan symbol, which not only completely undermined the basis of Christianity, but also directly associated the belief system with Dionysus, Bacchus, Osiris, and Tammuz. And then I came to realize that Christmas, Lent, Easter, Halloween, Sunday Worship, Mass, the Eucharist, and the Madonna and Child were based upon those same religions.

I did some investigating and found that the name Jesus was conceived in the 17th century, that there is no basis for it or Christ in Scripture, and that Grace is the name of a pagan goddess, as are Bible and Church. I dug a little deeper and discovered that there are over 300,000 discrepancies between the Textus Receptus and older, more reliable manuscripts. The fact is, it is impossible to accurately reconstruct the accounts and letters written in the first century ce, and even if it could be done, Greek was already a translation of a translation.

From this point I learned Hebrew and Greek and discovered that our English translations differ from what is written in the oldest manuscripts by more than fifty percent. And there are entire sections, like the opening of John, who is actually Yahowchanan, 8 which do not appear in any manuscript prior to the 8th century.

But that is relatively good news compared to what I found next. While Yahowah's testimony in the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms and the translations we have of Yahowsha's testimony match, they are wholly incomparable with Paul's letters and Christian doctrine. If God told the truth, then Paul and Christians are lying.

Christians universally ignore the terms and conditions required to engage in the beryth - covenant relationship with Yahowah, the first of which is to turn away from religion and politics. They have been led to believe by Paul that there is a new covenant, one which replaced the old one, and that they were saved from the Torah by it. But that is the antithesis of what Yahowah and Yahowsha' said. And as evidence of this, I've pasted below the entirety of the passage Christians take out of context to infer otherwise. And Christians universally ignore the lone path to eternal life, redemption, and reconciliation Yahowah provided. They do not celebrate Passover, Unleavened Bread, FirstFruits, Seven Sabbaths, Trumpets, Reconciliations, or Shelters, even though Yahowsha' not only observed them, but also honored Yahowah's promises by personally engaging to to the work required to facilitate the first four of these seven steps. Each has been replaced by a pagan counterfeit.

For anyone who has an open mind and who investigates the available evidence, especially the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms and the Ma'aseyah Yahowsha's Sermon on the Mount, it is obvious that virtually all of the available evidence affirms that Christianity is not only wrong, it is Satanic. According to Yahowah, ha Satan, whose name is Heylel ben Shachar, uses religion to deceive and lure people away from Him. His tools are babel, which is the mixing of lies and corruptions of the truth to make the counterfeit beguiling, and to remove His name, Yahowah and Yahowsha', replacing it with Satan's title "Lord - Ba'al." You, and billions like you, have been deceived by the Adversary--falling prey to the same scheme deployed against Adam and Chawah (Eve is a pagan name) in the Sheltered Enclosure of Joy, aka Gan Eden.

One day almost ten years ago now, God Yahowah, asked me to expose and condemn Islam using the words of its prophet and god. You like millions of others have stumbled upon the fruit of that labor. But after completing that job, Yah gave me a new one--to expose and condemn the religions of Christianity and Judaism using His Word. And while I have compiled some 3000 pages of amplified translations and etymological studies based upon them, my latest two books are especially relevant for a defender of the Christian religion. I've already given you the URL for www.QuestioningPaul.com. And I have attached my current incomplete draft of An Introduction to God. If you can open your mind, if you can handle questioning your religion, they will be of great benefit to you.

Now, here is that excerpt I promised...
Quote:
“Behold (hineh – look, listen, and pay close attention to what follows), days (yowmym – times) are coming (bow’ – will arrive and will return), prophetically declares (na’um – foretells, predicts, and reveals) Yahowah (YaHoWaH), when (wa) I will cut (karat – I will create, completely establishing and totally stipulating, I will actually make by way of separation (qal stem affirms reality and perfect conjugation speaks of an act which is total, complete, and indivisible)) relationally with (‘eth – as an eternal symbol on behalf of) the household and family (bayth – the home) of Yisra’el (yisra’el – those who strive and contend with, engage, persist, and endure with, are set free and are empowered by God) and relationally with (wa ‘eth – as an eternal symbol on behalf of) the household and family (bayth – the home) of Yahuwdah (Yahuwdah – those who are related to and engage with Yah) a renewed and restored (chadash – a renewing, restoring, repairing, and reaffirming) Family-Oriented Covenant Relationship (beryth – nurturing and engaged relational agreement established on the foundation of beyth – family and home, a mutually binding partnership promise, solemn oath, and active alliance, and a participatory pledge based upon a marriage vow which fosters and encourages).” (Yirmayahuw / Yahowah Uplifts / Jeremiah 31:31)

The part of this verse which Christians, desperate to justify their “New Testament,” miss, is that the renewal and restoration of the “beryth – Covenant” isn’t with Gentiles or their church, but instead, with Yahuwdah and Yisra’el. This promise, therefore, cannot apply to Christians or Christianity. It’s game over.

As a result, the only question worth debating in this passage is whether chadash should be translated “new” or “renewed,” as both are etymologically acceptable. Is God going to renew and restore, reaffirm and repair the Covenant presented in the Towrah with Yisra’el and Yahuwdah, or is He going to scrap the Towrah’s definition of this relationship and create an entirely new agreement?

To put this question to rest, you should know that the primary meaning of chadash, sometimes transliterated, hadas, is “to renew, to restore, to repair, and to reaffirm.” Of the ten times this verb is scribed in the Towrah, Prophets, and Psalms, it is translated: “restore and reaffirm” in 1 Samuel 11:14, “renewed and repaired” in 2 Chronicles 15:8, “to repair” in 2 Chronicles 24:4, “to repair and mend” in 2 Chronicles 24:12, “renewed” in Job 10:7, “renew” in Psalms 51:12, “renewed” in Psalms 103:5, again as “renewed” in Psalms 104:30, “repair” in Isaiah 61:4, and “renew and restore” in Lamentations 5:21.

As such, this passage actually reads: “Behold (hineh), days (yowmym) are coming (bow’), prophetically declares (na’um) Yahowah (YaHoWaH), when (wa) I will actually cut (karat) relationally with (‘eth) the household and family (bayth) of Yisra’el (yisra’el) and on behalf of (wa ‘eth) the household and family (bayth) of Yahuwdah (Yahuwdah) a renewing, restoring, and repairing (chadash – with the secondary meaning being: a renewed, repaired, and restored) Family-Oriented Covenant Relationship (beryth).” (Yirmayahuw 31:31) And in this way, Yahowah is saying that His Covenant “is renewing,” that it “is restoring,” and that it “will be affirmed,” as it “will repair” the relationship He has had with Yahuwdah and Yisra’el.

While this rendering of the 31st verse of Yirmayahuw is completely valid, it isn’t necessarily the conclusion you would come to if you casually looked up chadash in your favorite lexicon. Strong’s, for example, presents S2319 chadash (חָדַשׁ) as “new,” and then they claim that it was translated “new” 48 times [in the King James Version for which their concordance was created]. But look closely. The initial Strong’s entry regarding this word reveals that it is “From S2318 chadash (חָדָשׁ),” which they define as “to renew, to make anew, and to repair.” But that is misleading. It is actually the same word. As is chodesh (חֹדֶשׁ), which is translated “month” 254 times according to Strong’s. Therefore, the same three letters can be used to convey a verb, an adjective, and a noun—something which is quite common in Hebrew, as well as most ancient languages.

So while there is absolutely no textual distinction between these three forms of chadash in the Divine Writ, the Masoretes created one—and it is that variation which has caused modern lexicons to make three words out of one. This known, there was an additional slight of scholastic hand in operation here. In Hebrew, like most all languages, verbs rule. Because they are active, they shape the meaning of the nouns, adjectives, and adverbs which are based upon them. For example, if you are diligent in your Scriptural study, you will discover that the root of most nouns, adjectives, and adverbs are verbs. But in this particular case, we find a very telling contrived exception to the rule.

I share this with you because the verbal definition, which in the case of chadash/hadas is “to renew, to repair, to restore, and to reaffirm,” should have prevailed. In fact, it is from the root meaning of “chadash – renewal and restoration” that chodesh/hodes became “month,” as the light reflected from the moon’s surface was “renewed and restored.”

That is not to say, however, that the adjective chadash/hadas cannot be translated “new.” It can be when the context dictates. It only means that if there are two equally viable options, as there are in Yirmayahuw / Jeremiah 31:31, we should choose the form which is consistent with the verbal root. And that becomes especially important if the other option would have God contradicting Himself.

As further affirmation of “renewed and restored” being an appropriate translation of chadash/hadas in this context, we find that within the prophetic writings of Yirmayahuw and Yasha’yahuw, each time Yahowah inspired either man to scribe chadash/hadas, by rendering it “renewed,” or especially “restored,” we achieve a substantially more enlightening result than translating this word “new.”

These things known, the next line seems to suggest that there will be a new covenant, one different than the one whose terms and conditions were delineated in the Towrah. But is this even possible? Could God do such a thing without seriously contradicting other statements He has made, and in so doing, rendering Himself capricious, and His Word unreliable?

“It will not be exactly the same as (lo’ ka – it will not be identical to) the (ha) Covenant (beriyth – familial relationship, marriage vow, binding agreement, and pledge) which relationally (‘asher) I cut (karat – created through separation) with (‘et) their fathers (‘abowtam) in the day when (ba yowm) firmly grasping Me (hazaq – I repaired, renewed, and restored them, I established, sustained and supported them, I caused them to prevail and grow, as they were strengthened and encouraged by My power and authority) in their hand (ba yad – by them taking initiative, engaging, and reaching out) I led them out (yasa’ – I descended, extended Myself, and I served them by guiding them away) from (min) the realm (‘erets) of the crucible of Egypt (mitsraym – a metaphor for human religious, political, economic, and military oppression and divine judgment), which relationally (‘asher) they broke, disassociating themselves (parar – they violated and nullified, they frustrated, tore apart, and shattered, and they split away) from (‘eth) My Family-Oriented Covenant Relationship (beryth – My nurturing and engaged relational agreement established on the foundation of beyth – family and home, My mutually binding partnership promise, My solemn oath and active alliance, and My participatory pledge based upon a marriage vow which fosters and encourages), though (wa) I (‘anky) was married to them (ba ba’al hem – I was their husband), prophetically declares (na’um) Yahowah (YaHoWaH).” (Yirmayahuw / Jeremiah 31:32)

This affirms that the original Covenant was honored by God when He “hazaq – reached out to His people, and grasped hold of them, to renew and restore them,” “yasa’ min – leading them away from” “mitsraym – the crucible of religious and political oppression and divine judgment.” But, now, since Yisra’el and Yahuwdah subsequently “parar ‘eth beryth – broke their end of the agreement, and disassociated themselves from the relationship, the “beryth – Covenant Agreement” must be “chadash – reaffirmed, repaired, renewed and restored.”

The question now becomes: how is God going to do this without contradicting Himself? And what we find is a solution which is not only marvelous in its implications, but also one which completely destroys the Christian religion. Yahowah said:

“Indeed (ky – surely and truly) with this (ha zo’th – in conjunction with these conditions and provisions the) Familial Covenant Relationship (beryth – reciprocal partnership, active alliance, and engaged agreement, mutually binding and nurturing promise, solemn oath and participatory pledge, based upon a marriage vow) which relationally (‘asher) I will cut (karat – I will create and establish through separation) with (‘eth – and alongside) the House (bayth – household and family) of Yisra’el (yisra’el – those who strive and contend with, who engage, persist, and endure with, who are set free and are empowered by God) after (‘ahar – following) those days (ha yowm hem – that time), prophetically declares (na’um – predicts and promises) Yahowah (YaHoWaH), I will actually give My Towrah, completely providing and producing My Teaching and Instruction (natan ‘eth Towrah – I will reliably bestow and totally devote My Direction and My Guidance as a gift, putting it (here the qal stem affirms that this will actually occur and the perfect conjugation tells us that the gift of the Towrah will be whole and complete, indivisible and uninterruptible throughout time)) within their inner nature (ba qereb – internally, inside their person, within their core and midst, becoming part of their psychological makeup, thoughts, and emotions). And (wa) upon (‘al – as the Almighty concerning) their heart (leb – speaking of their source of life, and the seat of love, volition, feelings, attitude, and character) I will actually write it (katab – I will genuinely engrave and inscribe it (written in the qal relational stem, telling us that we can rely upon this occurring, and in the imperfect conjugation, affirming that it will produce ongoing results throughout time, with the first person singular prefix, saying that God, Himself will be doing the writing, and with the third person feminine singular suffix, telling us that it is the Towrah, which is a feminine noun, which will be inscribed)). And (wa) I shall be (hayah – I will always, reliably, and without interruption or exception be (qal stem perfect conjugation)) God (‘elohym) to and for them (la la), and (wa) they (hem), themselves shall be (hayah – they will always and reliably exist, eternally receiving the complete benefits of (qal relational stem affirming the genuineness of this promise, and imperfect conjugation which tells us that there will be ongoing and unfolding assistance and advantages associated with being considered)) to and for Me as (la la) family (‘am).” (Yirmayahuw / Jeremiah 31:33)

The insights provided by the unique relational aspects of Hebrew tenses require greater diligence on our behalf, but they are worth the investment of our time, especially in passages like this one. It wouldn’t be a stretch to suggest that the affirmations they provide regarding the unfolding and continuous results we can expect from God giving His Torah to us, placing His Instructions and Teaching inside of us, and writing His Guidance and Direction on our hearts, are as essential to our inclusion in God’s Covenant Family as anything ever written.


Again, you're not going to tell me Jesus Christ, which ur right, is not a last name; it is referred to stature - the Jesus Anointed one, did not walk the face of the earth for one reason alone.

Yada wrote:
Wake up, Denise. Think. The name "Jesus" is wrong. It is invalid. It is horribly misleading. It negates the most important possible realization. It was first conceived in the 17th century. There is no basis for it in any of the first through third century Greek manuscripts. Placeholders were used to tell you where to look to know and understand His name.

The Ma'aseyah's name is Yahowsha'. It means Yahowah Saves. Understanding this is absolutely essential to a person's salvation.

Titles precede names and many, like this one, must be preceded by the definite article. It is not Jesus Christ, Christ Jesus, or even Yahowsha' Christ. It is ha Ma'aseyah Yahowsha', meaning "the Work of Yah is Yah's Salvation."

If you study the oldest manuscripts you will find that the title you cite as Christ was never written. A placeholder was used to point those who observe Yahowah's Word to the place where they would find and understand Ma'aseyah. Also, if you study Greek, you will learn that Christ was based upon chiro, which speaks of the application of drugs. Further, the evidence available to us tells us that the placeholders for Ma'aseyah were based upon the Greek word chrestus, not chiro, and thus meant "the work of an upright servant."

These facts known, there is another problem conveyed in your Christian apologetic. You are not only using an errant and misleading name and title, one that separates Yahowsha' from Yahowah, you are focusing on the diminished manifestation of God rather than upon God. If you knew God, you would be speaking and writing on behalf of Yahowah, as did Yahowsha'.

Here is a review of some of the evidence pertaining to the errant name and title you are fixated upon.

Quote:
Now that we understand the most important name in the universe, let’s turn our attention to the second: Yahowsha’ – or sometimes transliterated Yahuwshuwa’, or simply Yahushua, even Yahshua. (The alternative ending (shuwa’ versus sha’) is derived from Deuteronomy 3:21 and Judges 2:7, where we find יְהוֹשׁוּעַ, as opposed to יְהוֹשֻׁעַ.) This name is equal parts an identity designation and a mission statement. As a compound of Yahowah’s name and yasha’, the Hebrew word for “salvation and deliverance,” Yahowsha’ tells us that Yahowah Himself is engaged in the process of saving us.

As for the name “Jesus,” which is more familiar to most of you, it is important to note that it cannot be found anywhere in God’s Word. As a matter of fact, there was and is no J in the Hebrew alphabet—nor one in Greek or Latin. The letter was not invented until the mid 16th-century, precluding anyone named “Jesus” existing prior to that time.

The letter J was first introduced by the Italian Renaissance humanist and grammarian, Gian Giorgio Trissino, who, while studying Latin texts in 1524, wrote Trissino’s Epistle about the Letters Recently Added in the Italian Language, to advocate the enrichment of Italian by using Greek characters to better distinguish between various sounds. His recommendations were universally ignored, save the modern distinction between the U and V as well as the letter I versus what would eventually become a J. In the aftermath of Trissino’s writings, his J was pronounced similarly to the Y in yet. But by the 17th-century, first in France (with the word junta), then in Germany and England, a new, harder sound, similar to the J in jet emerged, some say in association with Trissino’s Epistle.

The first English book to make a clear distinction between the “I” and “J” was published in 1634, where the new letter débuted on loan words from other languages, specifically Hallelujah rather than Halaluyah (meaning: radiate Yahowah’s brilliant light). (For those who relish dates, you may have noticed that 1634 is twenty-three years after the first edition of what was then called “The King Iames Bible” was printed in 1611. In it, Yahowsha’ was called “Iesous.”)

Therefore, we can say with absolute certainty that no one named “Jesus” lived in the 1st-century CE. “Jesus” is a falsified and manmade 17th-century forgery. More troubling still, “Jesus” is most closely allied linguistically with “Gesus” (pronounced “Jesus,”), the savior of the Druid religion (still practiced throughout England), wherein the “Horned One” was considered god.

There are a plethora of Christian (a title we will refute momentarily) apologists who errantly claim that “Jesus” was a transliteration of the Greek Iesou, Iesous, and Iesoun. The problem with that theory is four fold. Yahowsha’ wasn’t Greek; He was Hebrew. The Greek Iota is pronounced like the English I, rather than the come-lately J. The “u,” “us,” and “un” endings were derivatives of Greek grammar and gender, without a counterpart in Hebrew or English. And most importantly, you won’t find Iesou, Iesous, or Iesoun written on any page of any first-, second-, third-, or even early fourth-century Greek manuscript. As stated previously, Divine Placeholders were universally deployed (without exception) by the Disciples to convey Yahowah’s and Yahowsha’s name. Simply stated: it is impossible to justify the use of “Jesus.” It is wrong.

Yahowsha’, as a compound of “Yahowah” and “yasha’ – salvation,” means “Yah Saves.” Yahowsha’ tells us that Yahowah manifest Himself in the form of a man, and that as a man, He Himself delivered us. Yahowsha’ explains who He is and it defines His purpose.

And let there be no dispute: in the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms, you will find Yahowsha’ (יְהוֹשֻׁעַ) written 216 times—first in Shemowth / Names / Exodus 17:9. The Savior’s name was written Yahowshuwa’ (יְהוֹשׁוּעַ) twice (Dabarym / Words / Deuteronomy 3:21 and Shaphatym / Judges 2:7). Yashuwa’ was scribed in the revealed text on 30 occasions. And Yashuw’ah, pronounced similarly to Yahowsha’, appears another 78 times. Collectively, these 326 Scriptural witnesses to the descriptive name and title of God’s implement and mission tell us that Yahowah is the source of our Salvation.

There are many Messianic Jews, countless rabbis, and otherwise misinformed pseudo-intellectuals who choose to ignore the Scriptural pronunciation of Yahowsha’ (even though it is written 216 times in this form and twice as Yahowshuwa’) in favor of Yeshu (which was never written in the Torah, Prophets, or Psalms). The earliest undisputed extant occurrence of Yeshu is found in five brief anecdotes in the Babylonian Talmud (a collection of rabbinical discussions constituting Jewish Oral Law circa 500 CE). Yeshu is cited as the teacher of a heretic (in Chullin 2:22-24, Avodah Zarah 16-17), as a sorcerer scheduled to be stoned on the eve of Passover (in Sanhedrin 43a), as a son who burns his food in public (in Sanhedrin 103a), as an idolatrous former rabbinical student (in Sanhedrin 107b), and as the spirit of a foreigner who is an enemy of Israel (in Gittin 56b and 57a). Yeshu is also used in the Rabbinical Tannaim and Amoraim as a replacement for Manasseh’s name (he was Hezekiah’s only son, and at twelve upon assuming the throne, instituted pagan worship in direct opposition to his father) (Sanhedrin 103s and Berakhot 17b). The earliest explicit explanation of the Rabbinical term “Yeshu” is found in the mediaeval Toldoth Yeshu narratives which reveal: “Yeshu was an acronym for the curse ‘yimmach shemo vezikhro,’ which means: “may his name and memory be obliterated.”

If that isn’t sufficiently sobering, if that isn’t enough to make you scream every time you read or hear “Yeshu” or its clone, “Yehshu,” then you don’t know Him very well.

Affirming God’s affinity for His name, Yahowah is scribed exactly 7,000 times in the Towrah, Prophets, and Psalms. The four variations of Yahowsha’s name appear over 300 times. But that is not the end of the affirmations. There are another 260 Hebrew words, names, and titles based upon “Yah,” most all of which have been affirmed in the Dead Sea Scrolls. These were scribed in the Divine Writ no less than 3,000 times.

In opposition to these 10,000 affirmations, we have rabbis who universally despise Yahowah, changing it to “‘adonay – my Lord,” and Yahowsha’ advocating “Yeshu” in its place. So it seems reasonable to me to devalue their conflicting testimony in favor of Yahowah’s preference for Yah, not Ye, when addressing the Ma’aseyah.

During their Babylonian captivity in the 6th-century BCE, Yahuwdym (known as Jews today) developed a number of bad habits. As a result of being demeaned and mocked under the slang epithet “Yahoos,” they developed an aversion to all things “yah.” To minimize this irritation, Yahuwdym made it a crime to actually say Yahowah’s name. But they went even further, and purposefully misapplied their Sheva System, where the short e vowel was added to words comprised exclusively of consonants. And so long as the Sheva System only added this vowel to words without an Aleph, Ayin, Yowd, Hey, or Wah, that would have been fine. But they decided to assign an “e” following every occurrence of Yowd (י), irrespective of the fact that the י is a vowel, and is most often followed by another vowel, usually Hey (ה), and thereby altered the existing and proper pronunciation of the most important names, titles, and words found in the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms, including the spelling of God’s name. And while it sounds judgmental, this inconsistent application of their rule was done to keep people from knowing or saying: “Yah.”

While we are on this subject, it is particularly telling that the name ascribed to this artificial contrivance, Sheva, is from shav’ (שׁוא), the Hebrew word for “vanity,” in the sense of “failed and for naught.” Shav’ is “false, worthless, and lying speech which leads to emptiness and nothingness.” The fact that these deceivers labeled their revisionist system “false speech” is devastating to their credibility, and thus to the appropriateness of modern Hebrew vocalizations.

But with some due diligence, it gets even worse. There was no “v” in the paleo or Babylonian Hebrew language, so shav’ itself is a product of linguistic manipulation. Comprised of Shin-Wah-Aleph (שׁוא), this word was originally pronounced showa’, and it meant: “to ravage, destroy, and devastate, creating a desolate, lifeless, wasteland.” Such is the result of removing Yahowah’s name from our collective consciousness, and for changing not only the way it is spoken, but also the relationship between it and other words, titles and names associated with Yah.

By altering the existing and accurate paleo-Hebrew (Scriptural) pronunciation of the vowel following every Yowd (י), to “eh,” even when a Yowd is combined with Hey (ה), which is pronounced “ah,” as in hayah, and by changing the Wah (ו) from the vowel sound “o,” “oo,” or “u,” to the consonant “v,” all four letters in Yahowah’s name (הוהי) were compromised. Further, while showa’ (שׁוא) and shuwa’ (שׁוּעַ), were written differently in the text, because they are transliterated similarly, by implementing the Sheva System, Yahowshuwa’ of the Torah has now been associated with “false speech” by these deceivers—the same Scriptural manipulators later known as Masoretes. They are the ones who brought us the Masoretic Text and the corruption of Yahowah and Yahowsha’. They are the ones who promoted the myth that no one knows how to pronounce the name of God. They are the ones who would have you believe that Yehshu and Yehshua are accurate representations of the Hebrew name of the person known to us as “Jesus.” Do you suppose it was all coincidence? (For Yahowsha’s vivid description of this “brood of vipers,” read Mattanyah / Matthew 23:1-33.)

These things known, the second most misleading myth has been lampooned. The human manifestation of Yahowah, the corporeal implement God would use to do the work required to save us, is Yahowsha’, or Yahowshuwa’, depending upon which pronunciation you prefer. This name, as a synthesis of Yahowah and yasha’, the Hebrew word for “salvation,” affirms that: “Yahowah is our Savior.”

In paleo-Hebrew, the first three letters of Yahowsha’s name mirror those found in Yahowah. So by way of review, the Yowd was represented by way of an arm and hand. It symbolized the power and authority to do whatever work was required.

The second letter in Yahowsha’, like Yahowah, is Hey, which was drawn in the form of a person reaching up and pointing to the heavens. It conveyed the importance of observing what God had revealed, of taking note of His greatness, and of reaching up to Him for assistance.

The third letter is a Wah, which in its pictographic form depicted a tent peg, which were used to secure a shelter and to enlarge it. It spoke of adding to and increasing something.

In paleo-Hebrew, a Shin was drawn to represent teeth, making it symbolic of language and nourishment, even the word.

Ayin is the final letter in Yahowsha’s name. This character looked like an eye, and was used to convey the ideas of sight, observation, and knowledge. Even today, ayn is the Hebrew word for “eye, sight, perspective, and understanding.”

Bringing these images from Hebrew’s past together, we discover that Yahowsha’s name says that He is the power and the authority of Yahowah to do whatever work is required to assist those who look to Him, who observe His Word, and who reach up to Him for help. Those who accept and understand this perspective will be added to His family. They will be sheltered and become secure.

When it comes to affirming God’s preference for names, there is only one unimpeachable source: the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms. And so while we will scrutinize the following discussion from the book aptly named Yahowsha’, fully amplified and in its entirety, in the Towrah section, there is considerable merit to previewing the following excerpt of that message here as well.

“And it came to be (hayah), after (‘ahar) the physical death (mawet) of Moseh (Moseh), Yahowah’s (YaHoWaH’s) servant and coworker (‘ebed), Yahowah (YaHoWaH) spoke (‘amar) as God to (‘el) Yahowsha’ (Yahowsha’ – a compound of Yahowah and yasha’, saves), son of (ben) Nuwn – the eternally existing (Nuwn), who had rendered assistance to (sarat) Moseh, for the purpose of saying (la ‘amar), ‘Moseh, My servant and associate (‘ebed) has died (muwth), and so now, at this time (wa ‘atah) stand upright (quwm) and pass over (‘abar) this (zeth) Yarden (Yarden), you (‘atah) and the entire (kol) family (‘am) into God’s (‘el) realm (‘erets) which as a result of the relationship (‘asher) I am (‘anky) giving (natan) to them (la), to (la) the Children (beny) of Yisra’el – those who strive to live with God (Yisra’el).’” (Yahowsha’ 1:1-2)

“‘In the manner (ka) which relationally (‘asher) I existed with (hayah ‘eth) Moseh, I will be with you (hayah ‘eth). I will not fail you, nor withdraw from you (lo’ rapah), and I will not abandon you or neglect you (lo’...
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#214 Posted : Wednesday, May 11, 2011 3:13:56 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
S wrote:
I read ur stupid website and what u had to say about the Prophet saw and Islam. There's not much i have to say to u as u are a Kafar...u have no knowledge of Islam and all u have written is Lies.
What i would like to say is that Islam is the fastest growing Religion and it has and will over take the world.. People like you are Kafars... who spread bullshit abut Islam and its teachings.

All i have to say is INSHALLAH when u die u will find out. Allah will deal with u Kafars...and then there is no going back. U are not on this world FOREVER....when u die u will find out the truth.

Mark my words!!!!!!!!!!!!


Yada wrote:
Actually you are lying. You didn't read Prophet of Doom, because if you had, you would have known that it is based entirely on the five oldest Islamic sources. Therefore if it contains any lies, they are all Muhammad's lies.

In actuality, I understand Muhammad and his creation of Islam better than anyone. If you had read the book, you would have known that.

Popularity has nothing to do with truth or desirability. Never has. Never will.

Islam is too impoverished and foolish to take over the world. In fact, the 50 Islamic nations are among the worst places to live on the planet. Look at what's happening in most ever nation dominated by Islam. They are in complete chaos.

What's "bullshit" is Muhammad and Allah. The man was the most repulsive pervert and terrorist whoever lived. And his god was modeled after Satan.

Knowing what is true and what is not is not difficult, nor is knowing who is God and who is not. I know. You don't.

In a justified irony, you will have to deal with Allah upon your death, as Allah is Satan. As for me, I will spend eternity with Yahowah.

If you are interested in knowing Yahowah, read the Towrah. If not, enjoy your time with Allah in hell.


Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#215 Posted : Wednesday, June 1, 2011 12:24:40 PM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
A wrote:
You website is pathetic and if you were true believers in God you would not be doing what you are doing. No religion on earth encourages your behaviour.

Did Jesus claim to be God?
Many are willing to accept Jesus Christ as a good man, or a great prophet, but argue that Jesus never claimed to be God. Those who deny Jesus’ deity point out scriptures that back up their belief that Jesus never intended to be worshipped as God.
The evidence, however, indicates that from the time of the apostles, Jesus was worshipped as Lord. After the apostles died, several first and second century church leaders wrote of Jesus’ deity. Finally in 325 A. D. the leadership of the church articulated the belief that Jesus is fully God.
Some argue that the church “invented” Jesus’ deity by rewriting the gospel accounts. In fact, the world’s best-selling fictional book, The Da Vinci Code sold over 40 million books by making that claim (See “Was there a Da Vinci Conspiracy?”). Although the book made its author, Dan Brown, wealthy, his fictional account was debunked by scholars as bad history. In fact, the New Testament has been deemed the “most reliable of all ancient historical documents” (See. “Are the Gospels True?”).
In this article we will examine what Jesus Christ said about himself. What did Jesus mean by the terms, “Son of Man,” and “Son of God?” If Jesus wasn’t God, why did his enemies accuse him of “blasphemy?” More importantly, if Jesus wasn’t God, why did he accept worship?
First let’s look briefly at what Christians believe about Jesus Christ.
From Creator to Carpenter?
At the core of Christianity is the belief that God came to earth in the Person of His Son, Jesus Christ. The Bible teaches that Jesus is not a created being like the angels, but is the very Creator of the universe. As theologian J. I. Packer writes, “The gospel tells us that our Creator has become our Redeemer.”2
The New Testament reveals that, in accordance with his Father’s will, Jesus temporarily set aside his power and glory to become a tiny helpless baby. As he grew, Jesus worked in a carpenter shop, experienced hunger, got tired, and suffered pain and death like us. Then at age 30 he began his public ministry.
One God
The Bible reveals God as the Creator of the universe. He is infinite, eternal, all powerful, all-knowing, personal, righteous, loving, just, and holy. He created us in His image, and for His pleasure. According to the Bible, God made us to have an eternal relationship with Himself.
When God spoke to Moses at the burning bush 1500 years before Christ, He reaffirmed that He is the only God. God told Moses His name is Yahweh, (I AM). (Most of us are more familiar with the English translation, Jehovah or LORD.6) Since that time, the foundational Scripture (Shema) for Judaism has been:
"Hear, O Israel: the LORD our God is one LORD." (Deuteronomy 6:4)
It is in this world of monotheistic belief that Jesus entered into, ministered in, and began making claims that astounded all who heard them. And according to Ray Stedman, Jesus is the central theme of the Hebrew Scriptures.
“Here, in the form of a living, breathing human being, is the one who satisfies and fulfills all the symbols and prophecies of Genesis through Malachi. As we move from the Old Testament to the New, we find that one person, Jesus of Nazareth, is the focal point of both Testaments.”7
But if Jesus is the fulfillment of the Old Testament, his claims should confirm that “God is one LORD,” beginning with what he called himself. Let’s look further.
God’s SACRED Name
When Jesus began his ministry, his miracles and radical teaching immediately drew huge crowds, creating a frenzy of excitement. As his popularity swelled with the masses, the Jewish leaders (Pharisees, Sadducees, & Scribes) began to see Jesus as a threat. Suddenly they began looking for ways to trap him.
One day Jesus was debating some Pharisees at the Temple, when suddenly he told them he is “the light of the world.” It is almost bizarre to picture this scene, where a traveling carpenter from the lowlands of Galilee tells these PhD’s in religion that he is “the light of the world?” Believing that Yahweh is the light of the world, they replied indignantly:
“You are making false claims about yourself” (John 8:13 NLT).
Then Jesus told them that, 2,000 years earlier, Abraham had foreseen him. Their response was incredulous:
“You aren’t even fifty years old. How can you say you have seen Abraham? ” (John 8:58 NLT)
Then Jesus shocked them even more:
“The truth is, before Abraham was, I AM.” (John 8:58 NLT)
Out of the blue, this maverick carpenter with no degree in religion claimed to eternal existence. Furthermore, he had used the I AM title (ego eimi)8, the sacred Name of God for Himself! These religious experts lived and breathed the Old Testament Scriptures declaring Yahweh alone as God. They knew the Scripture spoken through Isaiah:
“I alone am God. There is no other God; there never has been and never will be. I am the Lord, and there is no other Savior.” Isaiah 43:10, 11 NLT)
Since the penalty for blasphemy was death by stoning, the Jewish leaders angrily picked up stones to kill Jesus. They thought Jesus was calling himself, “God.” At that point Jesus could have said, “Wait! You misunderstood me---I am not Yahweh.” But Jesus didn’t alter his statement, even at the risk of being killed.
Lewis explains their anger:
“He says…’I am begotten of the One God, before Abraham was, I am,’ and remember what the words ‘I am’ were in Hebrew. They were the name of God, which must not be spoken by any human being, the name which it was death to utter.”9
Some may argue that this was an isolated instance. But Jesus also used “I AM” for himself on several other occasions. Let’s look at some of these, trying to imagine our reactions upon hearing Jesus’ radical claims:
• “I am the light of the world” (John 8:12)
• “I am the way, the truth and the life” (John 14:6)
• “I am the only way to the Father” (John 14:6)
• “I am the resurrection and the life” (John 11:25)
• “I am the Good Shepherd” (John 10:11)
• “I am the door” (John 10:9)
• “I am the living bread” (John 6:51)
• “I am the true vine” (John 15:1)
• “I am the Alpha and Omega” Rev.1:7,8)
As Lewis observes, if these claims were not from God Himself, Jesus would have been deemed a loony. But what made Jesus credible to those who heard him were the creative miracles he performed, and his wise authoritative teaching.
Son of Man
Some say that Jesus didn’t intend the name I AM to mean he is God. They argue that Jesus’ reference to himself as the “Son of Man,” proves he didn’t claim divinity. So what is the context of the title, “Son of Man,” and what does it mean?”
Packer writes that the name, “Son of Man” referred to Jesus’ role as Savior-King, fulfilling the messianic prophecy of Isaiah 53.10 Isaiah 53 is the most comprehensive prophetic passage of the coming Messiah, and clearly depicts him as the suffering Savior. Isaiah had also referred to the Messiah as “Mighty God,” “Everlasting Father,” Prince of Peace” Isaiah 9:6).
Additionally, many scholars say Jesus was referring to himself as the fulfillment of Daniel’s prophecy about the “son of man.” Daniel prophesies that the “son of man” will be given authority over mankind and receive worship:
“I looked, and there before me was one like a son of man, coming with the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient of Days and was led into his presence. He was given authority, glory and sovereign power; all peoples, nations and men of every language worshipped him.” (Daniel 7:13, 14)
So who is this “son of man,” and why is he being worshipped, when God alone is to be worshipped. Jesus told his disciples that when he returns to earth,”Then everyone will see the Son of man arrive on the clouds with power and great glory” (Luke 21:27). Is Jesus saying here that he is the fulfillment of Daniel’s prophecy?
Son of God
Jesus also claimed to be the, “Son of God.” This title does not mean Jesus is God’s biological Son. Neither does the term “Son” imply inferiority anymore than a human son is inferior in essence to his father. A son shares his father’s DNA, and although he is different, they are both men. Scholars say that the term “Son of God” in the original languages refers to likeness, or “of the same order.” Jesus meant by it that he has divine essence, or in 21st century terms, the “DNA of God”. Professor Peter Kreeft explains.
“What did Jesus mean when he called himself the ‘Son of God’? The son of a man is a man. (Both ‘son’ and ‘man,’ in the traditional language, mean males and females equally.) The son of an ape is an ape. The son of a dog is a dog. The son of a shark is a shark. And so the Son of God is God. ‘Son of God’ is a divine title.”11
In John 17, Jesus speaks about the glory he and his Father shared before the world began. But by calling himself the “Son of God” is Jesus claiming equality with God? Packer answers:
When, therefore, the Bible proclaims Jesus as the Son of God, the statement is meant as an assertion of his distinct personal deity.”12
Thus, the names Jesus used for himself point to the fact that he was claiming equality with God. But did Jesus speak and act with the authority of God?
Forgiving Sin
In the Jewish religion, forgiveness of sin was reserved for God alone. Forgiveness is always personal; someone else cannot do the forgiving for the person offended, especially if the Person offended is God. But on several occasions Jesus acted as if he was God by forgiving sinners. The simmering religious leaders finally erupted at Jesus when he forgave the sins of a man with palsy right in front of them.
“The scribes who heard him said blasphemy! Who but God can forgive sins” (Mark 2:7)!
Lewis imagines the stunned reactions of all those who heard Jesus:
‘Then comes the real shock,’ wrote Lewis: ‘Among these Jews there sud denly turns up a man who goes about talking as if He was God. He claims to forgive sins. He says He always existed. He says He is coming to judge the world at the end of time. Now let us get this clear. Among Pantheists, like the Indians, anyone might say that he was a part of God, or one with God….But this man, since He was a Jew, could not mean that kind of God. God, in their language, meant the Being outside the world, who had made it and was infinitely different from anything else. And when you have grasped that, you will see that what this man said was, quite simply, the most shocking thing that has ever been uttered by human lips.’13
Claiming Oneness with God
Those who listened to Jesus, observed his moral perfection, and saw him perform miracles, wondered if he was the long-promised Messiah. Finally his opponents surrounded him at the Temple, asking:
“How long are you going to keep us in suspense? If you are the Messiah, tell us plainly.”
Jesus answered, “The proof is what I do in the name of my Father.” He compared his followers with sheep saying, “I give them eternal life, and they will never perish.” He then revealed to them that “the Father is greater than all,” and that his deeds were “at the Father’s direction.” Jesus’ humility must have been disarming. But then Jesus dropped a bombshell, telling them, (John 10:25-30)
“The Father and I are one.”
If Jesus had meant that he was merely in agreement with God, there would have been no strong reaction. But, the Jews again picked up stones to kill him. Jesus then asked them, “At my Father’s direction I have done many things to help the people. For which one of these good deeds are you killing me?”
They replied, “Not for any good work; but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, have made yourself God” (John 10:33).
As Jesus was preparing his disciples for his upcoming death on the cross and departure, Thomas wanted to know where he was going and the way there. Jesus answered Thomas:
“I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one can come to the Father except through me. If you had known who I am, then you would have known who my Father is. From now on you know him and have seen him.” (John 14:5-9)
They were confused. Philip then speaks up, asking Jesus to “show us the Father.” Jesus’ answers Philip with these shocking words:
“Philip, don’t you even yet know who I am, even after all the time I have been with you? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father!”
In effect Jesus was saying, “Philip if you want to see the Father, look at me!”
In John 17 Jesus reveals that this oneness with his Father had existed in eternity past, “before the world began.” According to Jesus, there has never been a time when he did not share God’s very glory and essence.
God’s Authority
The Jews always regarded God as the ultimate authority. Authority was a well understood term in Roman-occupied Israel. At that time, Cae sar’s edict could instantly launch legions into war, condemn or exoner ate criminals, and establish laws and rules of government. In fact, Caesar’s authority was such that he himself claimed divinity.
Prior to leaving earth, Jesus explained the scope of his authority:
“Jesus said, ‘I have been given complete authority in heaven and on earth’”
(Matthew 28:18, NLT).
In these remarkable words, Jesus is claiming to be the supreme author ity, not just on earth, but in heaven also. John Piper observes,
“This is why Jesus’ friends and enemies were staggered again and again by what he said and did. He would be walking down the road, seemingly like any other man, then turn and say something like, ‘Before Abraham was, I am.’ Or, ‘If you have seen me, you have seen the Father.’ Or, very calmly, after being accused of blasphemy, he would say, ‘The Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins.’ To the dead he might simply say, ‘Come forth,’ or, ‘Rise up.’ And they would obey. To the storms on the sea he would say, ‘Be still.’ And to a loaf of bread he would say, ‘Become a thousand meals.’ And it was done immediately.”14
Some might argue that since the authority came from his Father, it has nothing to do with Jesus being God. But God never gives His authority to a created being in order that they are to be worshipped. To do so would be to violate His Command.
Accepting Worship
Nothing is more fundamental to the Hebrew Scriptures than the fact that God alone is to be worshipped. In fact, the first of the Ten Commandments is,
“Do not worship any other gods besides me” (Exodus 20:3 NLT).
Thus, the most terrible sin a Jew could commit was to either worship another creature as God, or to receive worship. So if Jesus is not God, it would be blasphemy to receive worship.
After Jesus’ resurrection, the disciples told Thomas they had seen the Lord alive (John 20:24-29). Thomas scoffed, telling them he would only believe if he could put his fingers on the nail wounds of Jesus’ hands and into his pierced side. Eight days later the disciples were all together in a locked room when Jesus suddenly appeared in front of them. Jesus looked at Thomas and told him to “Put your finger here and see my hands. Put your hand into the wound in my side.”
Thomas needed no more proof. He instantly believed, exclaiming to Jesus:
“My Lord and my God!”
Thomas worshipped Jesus as God! If Jesus is not God, he certainly should have reprimanded Thomas right there. But instead of reprimanding Thomas for worshipping him as God, Jesus commended him, saying:
“You believe because you have seen me. Blessed are those who haven’t seen me and believe anyway.”
Jesus accepted worship on nine recorded occasions. In context of Jewish belief, Jesus’ acceptance of worship speaks volumes about his claim to divinity. But it wasn’t until after Jesus ascended to heaven that his disciples fully understood. Before Jesus left earth, he told his apostles to “baptize new disciples in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit” (Matt. 28:19), putting both the Holy Spirit and himself on the same level as the Father.15
Alpha and Omega
While John the apostle was in exile on the Island of Patmos, Jesus revealed to him in a vision the events that will occur in the last days. In the vision, John describes the following incredible scene:
“Look! He comes with the clouds of heaven. And everyone will see him---even those who pierced him....’I am the Alpha and the Omega---the beginning and the end,’ says the Lord God. ‘I am the one who is, who always was, and who is still to come, the Almighty One.’”
So who is this Person who is called “the Alpha and Omega,” “the Lord God,” “the Almighty One”? We are told that he was “pierced.” That makes it clear that the Alpha and Omega is Jesus. He is the one who was pierced on the cross.
John, who was closer to Jesus than any other disciple, sees the image of the Person speaking to him. He writes:
“And standing in the middle of the lampstands was the Son of Man….His head and his hair were white like wool, as white as snow. And his eyes were bright like flames of fire….And his face was as bright as the sun in all its brilliance (Rev. 1:13, 14, 16b).
It is impossible to grasp John’s emotions as he sees this Person shining like the sun in full strength, with eyes like flames of fire. He immediately fell as a dead man in front of the one he saw. If this was Jesus, why didn’t John know him? Perhaps he thought it was an angel? Let’s listen to John’s words.
“But he laid his right hand on me and said, ‘Don’t be afraid! I am the First and the Last. I am the living one who died. Look, I am alive forever and ever’” (Rev. 1:17)!
The One talking to John identifies himself as, "the First and the Last," a clear reference to his eternality. And since only God is eternal, this must be God. But in the same sentence he tells John that he is "the living one who died." Thus, we know this could not be God the Father because the Father never suffered death as a man.
“And I saw a great white throne, and I saw the one who was sitting on it. . . . And the one sitting on the throne said . . . ’I am the Alpha and the Omega---the Beginning and the End.’” (Revelation 20:11; 21:6)
It is the Lord Jesus Christ who rules from the great white throne. Jesus had already told his disciples that he would be the final judge of men. He promised that those who put their trust in him would be saved from the judgment of sin, but those who reject him will be judged.
Conclusion
So did Jesus claim to be God, or was he simply misunderstood. Let’s take another look at Jesus’ claims and ask: would Jesus have made such radical claims if he was not God?
• Jesus used God’s Name for himself
• Jesus called himself “Son of Man”
• Jesus called himself “Son of God”
• Jesus claimed to forgive sin
• Jesus claimed oneness with God
• Jesus claimed all authority
• Jesus accepted worship
• Jesus called himself the “The Alpha and Omega”
Some might say, “how can we believe Jesus’ claims? What proof did he leave?”
Three days after his crucifixion, his disciples claimed they saw him alive. If their story was a hoax, it would have died out as the Romans submitted them to the most horrendous torture known to man. But their conviction and sincerity overpowered Rome and changed our world (See "Did Jesus rise from the dead?"). Lewis explains the reason for their conviction:
“What is beyond all space and time, what is uncreated, eternal, came into nature, descended into His own universe, and rose again.”16
This brilliant scholar had originally thought of Jesus as a myth, much like the man-made gods of Ancient Greece and Rome. But as he began to look at the evidence for Jesus Christ, he realized that the New Testament accounts of Jesus Christ are based upon solid, historical facts. This former skeptic concludes his investigation of the evidence for Jesus Christ with these thoughts:
“You must make your choice: Either this man was, and is, the Son of God: or else a madman or something worse.... But let us not come up with any patronizing nonsense about His being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us.”17
Lewis discovered that a personal relationship with Jesus gave his life meaning, purpose, and joy that surpassed all his dreams. He never regretted his choice and became a leading spokesman for Jesus Christ. What about you? Have you made your choice?
________________________________________
Endnotes
1. Ravi Zacharias, Jesus Among Other Gods (Nashville: Word, 2000), 38.
2. J. I. Packer, Knowing God (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1993), 189.
3. George A. Barton, Jesus of Nazareth (New York: Macmillan, 1931), 395.
4. Zacharias, 89.
5. C. S. Lewis, God in the Dock (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2000), 157, 158.
6. The Hebrew Scriptures sometimes join Yahweh (Jehovah) with an additional word to emphasize God’s dealing with man. “Yahweh Elohim” and “Adonai Yahweh” are translated “Lord God,” and “Yahweh Sabaoth” is translated “Lord of hosts.” (C.I Scofield, The Scofield Reference Bible (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), 6, 983.
7. Ray C. Stedman, Adventuring Through the Bible (Grand Rapids, MI: Discovery House, 1997), 479.
8. Ego eimi is the Greek equivalent of the Hebrew name Isaiah used to describe God in Isaiah 43:10, 11. Dr. James White notes, “The closest and most logical connection between John’s usage of ego eimi and the Old Testament is to be found in the Septuagint rendering of a particular Hebrew phrase, ani hu in the writings (primarily) of Isaiah. The Septuagint translates the Hebrew phrase ani hu as ego eimi in Isaiah 41:4, 43:10 and 46:4.” (http://www.aomin.org/EGO.html)
9. Lewis, 157.
10. Packer, 198.
11. Why I am a Christian, Norman L. Geisler, Paul K. Hoffman, eds, “Why I Believe Jesus is the Son of God” (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 2001), 223.
12. Packer, 57.
13. C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity (San Francisco: HarperCollins, 1972), 51.
14. John Piper, The Pleasures of God (Sisters, OR: Multnomah, 2000), 35.
15. Christians believe that there is one God who exists in three distinct, equal Persons: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit (trinity). No earthly analogy can adequately explain how one God can exist as three Persons. However, two scientific examples illustrate how one entity can exist in multiple forms. 1. Light exists as a duality, appearing in nature as both a wave and a particle. 2. The H20 molecule is one essence, yet exists as steam, water, and ice. The God of the Bible, however, is beyond our full comprehension, being infinite, eternal, immutable, omniscient, omnipresent, and omnipotent.
16. Lewis, God in the Dock, 80.
17. Lewis, Mere Christianity, 52.

he Bible is riddled with repetitions and contradictions, things that the Bible bangers would be quick to point out in anything that they want to criticize. For instance, Genesis 1 and 2 disagree about the order in which things are created, and how satisfied God is about the results of his labors. The flood story is really two interwoven stories that contradict each other on how many of each kind of animal are to be brought into the Ark--is it one pair each or seven pairs each of the "clean" ones? The Gospel of John disagrees with the other three Gospels on the activities of Jesus Christ (how long had he stayed in Jerusalem--a couple of days or a whole year?) and all four Gospels contradict each other on the details of Jesus Christ's last moments and resurrection. The Gospels of Matthew and Luke contradict each other on the genealogy of Jesus Christ's father; though both agree that Joseph was not his real father. Repetitions and contradictions are understandable for a hodgepodge collection of documents, but not for some carefully constructed treatise, reflecting a well-thought-out plan.
Of the various methods I've seen to "explain" these:
1. "That is to be taken metaphorically." In other words, what is written is not what is meant. I find this entertaining, especially for those who decide what ISN'T to be taken as other than the absolute WORD OF GOD--which just happens to agree with the particular thing they happen to want...
2. "There was more there than...." This is used when one verse says "there was a" and another says "there was b," so they decide there was "a" AND "b"--which is said nowhere. This makes them happy, since it doesn't say there WASN'T "a+b." But it doesn't say there was "a+b+little green martians." This is often the same crowd that insists theirs is the ONLY possible interpretation (i.e., only "a") and the only way. I find it entertaining they they don't mind adding to verses.
3. "It has to be understood in context." I find this amusing because it comes from the same crowd that likes to push likewise extracted verses that support their particular view. Often it is just one of the verses in the contradictory set which is supposed to be taken as THE TRUTH when, if you add more to it, it suddenly becomes "out of context." How many of you have gotten JUST John 3:16 (taken out of all context) thrown at you?
4. "There was just a copying/writing error." This is sometimes called a "transcription error," as in where one number was meant and an incorrect one was copied down. Or what was "quoted" wasn't really what was said, but just what the author thought was said. And that's right--I'm not disagreeing with events, I'm disagreeing with what is WRITTEN. Which is apparently agreed that it is incorrect. This is an amusing misdirection to the problem that the Bible itself is wrong.
5. "That is a miracle." Naturally. That is why it is stated as fact.
6. "God works in mysterious ways." A useful dodge when the speaker doesn't understand the conflict between what the Bible SAYS and what they WISH it said.
No equality, but dominion granted to Adam's lineage ONLY.
Gen 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

Bible for Adam's lineage ONLY
Gen 5:1 This is the book of the race of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him;

The TWO SEEDLINES, one truly of Adam, who is white according to other references, and the other mixed, Cain's line, Mongrels
Gen 3:15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

Of course the most racist chapter in the bible in my opinion is ROMANS 9 where Paul excludes BILLIONS from even being able to be adopted into the faith.....
Rom 9:3 For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh:
Rom 9:4 Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises;
Rom 9:5 Whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen.
Rom 9:6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not allIsrael, which are of Israel:
Rom 9:7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.
Rom 9:8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.
Rom 9:9 For this is the word of promise, At this time will I come, and Sara shall have a son.
Rom 9:10 And not only this; but when Rebecca also had conceived by one, even by our father Isaac;
Rom 9:11 (For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth;)
Rom 9:12 It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger.
Rom 9:13 As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.
Rom 9:14 What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid.
Rom 9:15 For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.
Rom 9:16 So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.
Rom 9:17 For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might shew my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth.
Rom 9:18 Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth.
Rom 9:19 Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth he yet find fault? For who hath resisted his will?
Rom 9:20 Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?
Rom 9:21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
Rom 9:22 What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction:
Rom 9:23 And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory,
Rom 9:24 Even us, whom he hath called, not of the Jews only, but also of theGentiles?
Rom 9:25 As he saith also in Osee, I will call them my people, which were not my people; and her beloved, which was not beloved.
Rom 9:26 And it shall come to pass, that in the place where it was said unto them, Ye are not my people; there shall they be called the children of the living God.
Rom 9:27 Esaias also crieth concerning Israel, Though the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea, a remnant shall be saved:
Rom 9:28 For he will finish the work, and cut it short in righteousness: because a short work will the Lord make upon the earth.
Rom 9:29 And as Esaias said before, Except the Lord of Sabaoth had left us a seed, we had been as Sodoma, and been made like unto Gomorrha.
Rom 9:30 What shall we say then? That the Gentiles, which followed not after righteousness, have attained to righteousness, even the righteousness which is of faith.
Rom 9:31 But Israel, which followed after the law of righteousness, hath not attained to the law of righteousness.
Rom 9:32 Wherefore? Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were by the works of the law. For they stumbled at that stumblingstone;
Rom 9:33 As it is written, Behold, I lay in Sion a stumblingstone and rock of offence: and whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.

Peter too:
1Pe 2:9 But ye are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye


Yada wrote:
You are wrong about most everything, as is the site you cited. But, sadly, like all of those deceived by religion, no amount of irrefutable evidence even from God Himself would be sufficient to dissuade you from your beliefs. But should I be wrong about you, ask and I'll introduce you to God. But please don't bother unless you are willing and able to question your religion. Leaving religion is a prerequisite for knowing Yahowah.

Prophet of Doom is the single best documented, most comprehensive, contextual, and chronological presentation of Islam's five oldest and most credible sources ever compiled. So while it isn't perfect, the only thing "pathetic" about it is the man, god, and religion it covers and condemns.

I know Yahowah, and thus have no reason to "believe." And as for "religion," since Yahowah is opposed to religion, I have no use for it either.

If you weren't so ignorant and irrational, you would know that there was no "Jesus Christ." The set-apart and diminished manifestation of Yahowah is ha Ma'aseyah Yahowsha'. But knowing the truth is well beyond a Muslim. Your wannabe god Allah (who was modeled after Satan) called Him "Issa" in his Qur'an. Issa is a transliteration of Esau, the one person Yahowah said that He hated because he had associated with Ishmael.

The material you cut and pasted from the book written by an atheist is so faulty, so errant, so ignorant and irrational, it isn't worth the time it would take to respond. But, should you be interested in a response, read: www.YadaYahweh.com and www.QuestioningPaul.com.

It's a shame that you cannot see your own hypocrisy. Juxtaposition your opening comments against the material you copied.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#216 Posted : Wednesday, June 1, 2011 12:26:11 PM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
F wrote:
Dear Sir,
I have been reading in your website and I share with you the frustration and I wonder how America keeps many of these stupid Muslims in USA? I am Muslim but I feel ashamed to be one for what these stupid Muslims do. I swear that you American people are very patient and wise and million times better than these stupid Muslims. I wonder how you people can withstand Muslims stupidity and attacks against America. From what I have seen so far that majority of Muslims exhibited terrorist behavior, offensive acts, they steal, tell lies, sin, cause damage to one another’s, and then they blame America – this is insane. I question where did they learn all of this corruption from? Thank god I am not like them. I also support your views and comments and I pray for you the best and I am with you. I tell you I wish I were non-Muslim American. My people may kill me if I say that.
By the way, one of my observations is that Muslim women get more aggressive when they put on the hijab (scarf) on their head and become terrible beings and aggressive. This is really very strange phenomenon. I know many Muslim women in California who become deadly, lose femininity, and act very rude because of the scarf. They train on guns to kill man and non Muslims and this is scary. I remember a stupid Muslim once told me that Muslim women should train on killing non-Muslims and I totally abhor this idea and I am against it because it makes no sense and doesn’t sound human at all. I pray for the Muslim man safety from his Muslim women aggression and hate. I also envy the non-Muslim man for having non-Muslim women, not only they are peaceful women, but are also more attractive and beautiful, natural for not wearing hijab, more feminine, loving, and thoughtful. I think hijab makes many Muslim women become evil. This is bad.
God bless you,
F


Yada wrote:
F,

Since you are right in your observations about what Islam does to corrupt and individual, why are you still a Muslim? Should you want to know God, I have attached a copy of my current book, where I strive to introduce Him to those who are willing to question their religion.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#217 Posted : Wednesday, June 1, 2011 12:30:19 PM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
HS wrote:
Hi

I am a conservative Christian attending Calvary Baptist Church in Beaumont Texas. I just spent a year researching on my own and then writing a 60 page letter for a muslim friend. This lady, born & reared as an East Texas Pentecostal, made the mistake of marrying an Iranian Muslim & converting. I believe that my efforts are paying off, because she e-mailed me recently asking if I had heard of your "Prophet of Doom"

I believe that with my letter [having some of the same content that I detect in your writing, though not so comprehensive] and "Prophet of Doom" and above all, prayer, God is working on her.

I noticed in one of your replies a mistake of spiritual knowledge. I have spent about 7 years studying the Bible and the commentaries of such men as Barnes, Clarke, Scott, Henry & the great minds of the past. I do not study any modern thought because it is more likely to come from deception.

We have known who THE Antichrist IS for almost 1800 years. If you study the ancient commentaries there can be little doubt. Furthermore, although it is not perfect, the thoughts of Uriah Smith also blend well with what the Christians of the Reformation & post reformation believed.

The Antichrist is not a person. You have to study the words of scripture very carefully. THE Antichrist is a SYSTEM of religion which murders True Believers and controls every aspect of human life, commerce, government, society, etc.

The False Prophet is also a SYSTEM of religion [also one of the anti-christs READ John 6:66] which murders true believers and attempts to control every aspect of human life, commerce, ETC. THE False Prophet is none other than ISLAM, I will leave it to you to understand WHAT The Antichrist has been.

Thank You for your wonderful work for or God. May he richly bless your efforts. I will pray for you and yours.

Thank You,

H S

We are almost at the end [tho it may last a hundred years] of the great tribulation which will see the "defanging" of Islam.


Yada wrote:
H S,

Islam is Satanic to be sure. And the truth about Islam is capable of freeing those who are willing to question their religion. And that is why I wrote Prophet of Doom.

But the same can be said of Christianity. It too is a false religion based upon the letters of the false apostle Paul. You ought not be reading Barnes, Clarke, Scott, and Henry, but instead Yahowah and His Towrah, Prophets, and Psalms. He is the only reliable witness.

Should you be interested in knowing Yahowah, as opposed to knowing the "Antichrist," I'll send you my review of the seven topics most important to Him. But for your sake and mine, please don't ask for this unless you are willing to question your religion, especially those places it is in conflict with Yahowah's testimony. The lone prerequisite for engaging in the Covenant is leaving Babylon, and that means leaving Christianity. Those who are unwilling to do so will find it impossible to properly evaluate Yahowah's message.

The Whore of Babylon is not a person, but describes Satan's role in conceiving and promoting the religions of Christianity, Judaism, Islam and Socialist Secular Humanism. Babylon itself is most closely identified with Christianity, especially Roman Catholicism. As for the anti-Ma'aseyah, he is a man. But we do not know him. He won't be known until after he rises to power in what I think will be Macedonia and then aligns neighboring nations while reaffirming a treaty between Israel and others some 15 years from now. We can, however, know a great deal about him by observing Yah's Word.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#218 Posted : Thursday, June 9, 2011 8:21:14 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
K wrote:
Hi Yada,

Robert Spencer is writing a new book that questions the authenticity of Muhammad's personna.

Do you think Muhammad was a real person or do you believe he was constructed by Arab conquerors who simply wated a prophet of their own to be used effectively in their conquests of new lands?

K


Yada wrote:
K,

I will not comment on anything RS says or writes.

As for Muhammad being a real person, yes, the evidence suggests that he was a real scumbag, but it does not matter. I invite you to read the Source Material Appendix of Prophet of Doom to understand why. When it comes to religions, facts are irrelevant. So it isn't a matter of who he actually was, but instead what is believed to be true about him.

Here is the link: http://prophetofdoom.net...x_Islams_Dark_Past.Islam

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#219 Posted : Sunday, June 26, 2011 4:54:12 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
L wrote:
Hello,

Your site is wonderful. I have heard Yada speak many times. I have linked you from my website's main page, all pages really and support you in your work to expose Islam for the wickedness it is...

I would like to admonish you to consider much more information about about the brutalization of women that goes on right now to day in Islam. For example, how the rape of women is a protected practice and how women's genitals are mutilated in Countries all over the world from some who practice female circumcision.

I think you site has tons of info, but not enough information about these topics. Just a little constructive criticism.

By the way do you have a youtube channel? If not if you have any materials audio or video you would permit me to upload giving any and all credits to you and linking your site I would consider it a privilege to do so.

Thanks for all you are doing,

L


Yada wrote:
L,

Thanks for the note. I understand and accept your constructive criticism. We have revealed all of the sexist comments Muhammad and his wannabe god made to demean women in the context of Muhammad's life, we have listed all of these again in the topical quotations section, and have posted a variety of articles that we have written about the horrible treatment of women in Islam, but we could and should say more. It is one of Islam's greatest faults.

I do not frequent youtube or promote this message using that tool, and therefore I would encourage you to expose the message contained in this book and on this site on YouTube. Thank you.

Yada


L wrote:
Hello Yada,

I will do that dear brother in the Lord. I will use the wonderful content from you site and of course give credit where credit is due.

I heard a disturbing report today about how women are routine raped in Islamic territories, and if they dare to report it the are often raped again, beaten, or killed for bringing dishonor to their families. This is pure evil, and sadly I am afraid will be coming to America as Islamunists take over different towns in our country. Many Muslim men believe than an infidel woman does not deserve any respect and they can do whatever the wish to her.

We all must speak out on this evil. I know I will do as you are doing and as the prophet Isaiah said, to "cry aloud and spare not..."

Thank you again for your work, I truly mean that, you have been warning people for a long time of the inherent dangers of Islam and their "Prophet of Doom"

Thanks,

L


Yada wrote:
Yes, Islam is as purely evil as any religion conceived by men. And it is the most demeaning and destructive religion ever perpetrated on women. But, be aware, Islamic women are more aggressive in the defense of this demonic religion than are Muslim men.

Yada

PS - A close examination of Yahowah's Word confirms that God wants to be called by His name, Yahowah, and not "Lord." Lord is a translation of Ba'al, which is the Adversary's title, as it describes his desire.


L wrote:
No offense was intended by the use of the word Lord. I was speaking of the Lord Jesus Christ as He is called throughout the Bible and can in no way be confused with Ba'al when used in full.


Yada wrote:
L,

This reply will be very difficult for you to read. Your religion will most likely cause you to defiantly reject everything I have shared. But every word of it is true. Every word of it is in accord with the teaching of Yahowah. I took the time to write this in the hope that some of what I've disclosed will cause you to verify these statements, and then based upon discovering their accuracy, for the first time to question your religion. For only then will you be prepared to know God.

In direct response to your letter, L, actually, no He isn't called "the Lord," "Jesus" or "Christ" and God's Word isn't called "the Bible." Further: "the Lord Jesus Christ" isn't "his name in full."

Beyond the fact that Divine Placeholders are exclusively used to designate the proper name and titles for Yahowah and Yahowsha' in every extant Greek manuscript prior the the mid fourth century, God's one and only name is Yahowah. His name is written exactly 7000 times in His Word. His diminished and set-apart corporeal manifestation is ha Ma'aseyah Yahowsha'. Ma'aseyah means "the work of Yah." and Yahowsha' means "Yahowah Saves." The title is presented 26 times and this name is scribed 260 times. There is almost nothing as important as understanding what they imply.

Jesus was first used in the 17th century, and it has no connection of any kind with His actual name. There is no "J" in Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, or Latin. The letter wasn't even invested prior to the 16th century. Christ is wrong on every account, which is why I have attached the Introduction to God rather than explaining it to you here. These misnomers were created by the proponents of the new religion of Christianity to separate Yahowsha' from Yahowah and the Towrah.

Yahowah explicitly tells us that He does not want to be called "the Lord" in Hosea and in Jeremiah, passages which are translated from the Hebrew for you in the Introduction to God. Lord is used for ha Satan because he wants to lord over God and men, controlling both. Yahowah only wants to be our Father by way of the Covenant. Fathers are not "lords."

Yahowah's testimony is called the Towrah (which means teaching, direction, instruction, and guidance), Prophets, and Psalms. Bible is the name of a Egyptian sun goddess. Worse yet, since the Covenant has not yet been renewed (proof of which from God Himself is contained in the attached book), there cannot be a New Testament, which is where you are reading these errant translations. And to make matters worse, since Paul consistently contradicted the God he claimed to represent, the only informed and rational conclusion is that he lied throughout his letters. For more on this, read: www.QuestioningPaul.com. (And as an interesting aside, Paul demeaned women as well. It is one of many things he had in common with Muhammad.)

It is good that you know that Islam is cruel to women. And it is good that you are willing to expose and condemn it. But you have a lot to learn about your own religion.

I was a Christian when I began writing Tea With Terrorists. I was an ordained ruling elder, an active evangelist, and held regular bible studies. But something triggered me to question my faith, and that led to a voyage of discovery. I came to know Yahowah, to accept the terms and conditions of His Covenant (of which there are five), and to walk to Him along the seven step path He provided and enabled.

While the hardest thing for anyone to do is to question their religion, if you want to know God and to be saved by Him, it is a step you must take. And if you do, if you devote the time to observe His testimony, you will find Him waiting for you with open arms.

The trigger for me was the realization that the "Bible" was not remotely accurate. It does not properly reflect the oldest witnesses to the text. Evidence for this is ubiquitous and irrefutable. You can research this for yourself online or by reading books on the oldest extant manuscripts. You can use interlinears and lexicons to prove it as well.

For you, your trigger may be the fact that you have been led to believe an erroneous name, and an erroneous title. These facts are also easy to verify for yourself, and they are proven in the attached book. Perhaps it will be the Divine Placeholders and what they actually represent. It might be a rational review of Paul's letters, contrasting them with Yahowah's and Yahowsha's very different testimony. It may be the book I have attached. But whatever it may be, according to the lone prerequisite of the Covenant, you must walk away from your faith before you will be able to engage in the Covenant. I hope you do. It will be the best choice you ever make.

But no matter what choice you make, now you know that there is absolutely no possibility whatsoever that God's name is "the Lord Jesus Christ." And hopefully, that will be sufficient to move you away from those who have misled you into believing that it was.

Yada

The Introduction to God is currently 540 pages long, but it is not yet complete. I am still adding Scriptural material to the Towrah Section because that is where most religious people go astray. And I have not yet distilled the material from the Called-Out and Salvation Volumes of Yada Yah to create the final two sections of this book. But it is already sufficient to help you come to know Yahowah as He revealed Himself to us. Most all of the evidence presented therein is from God Himself.

My experience with religious individuals is that most lack the will and/or capacity to consider and process evidence which is opposed to their faith, even it that evidence comes from God. My hope for you is that you will open yourself up to the possibility, and then the reality, that Sunday Worship, Church, Christmas, Easter, Lord, Bible, Old and New Testaments, discounting the Torah, Paul, Jesus, Christ, Gospel, Grace, and Cross are not only wrong, but contrary to the testimony of Yahowah. The truth is much more wonderful than any of these lies.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#220 Posted : Monday, June 27, 2011 2:00:24 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
L replied to Yada's last email:

L wrote:
Sorry,

You got to me too late. There is no other name given among men whereby we must be saved. Ain't gonna happen. I know who Yeshua Hamishia is, the Father sent His Son to be the savior of the world. You could never convince me otherwise. The Holy Spirit bears witness with my spirit and has affirmed this in me.

You are right were we have nothing in common since you do not believe in the name of the only begotten Son of God.

Thank you for being honest and forthright about who you are and what you believe.


Yada wrote:
L,

Yeshua is a Rabbinic corruption with very nasty connotations. It is far worse than the mythical "Jesus." If you had read what I had sent you, you would know what it means. And there is no such thing as a Hamisia.

But as I suspected, based upon your reply you are too religious to let either Yahowah's Word, evidence, or reason get in the way of your faith. Too bad, Yahowah's witness, His Towrah, His Covenant, and His Called-Out Assembly Meetings are all so much better than the religious lie to which you and so many others cling.

It is amazing however that after being told that it is impossible for Yahowah's Son to be named "Jesus Christ," you still believe the religious deception. You believe that you can be saved by placing your faith in an errant name. You believe something which is contrary to the explicit teaching of the very God you believe you are following. It is truly sad what religion does to people's ability to think rationally, and it matters not if it is Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Mormonism, or Socialist Secular Humanism. And if it makes me sad, it must make Yahowah cry.

Based upon your reply, it is obvious that you have no capacity to understand the implications of Yahowsha'. As such, you have no idea who the "savior" actually is, much less what God did on Passover, Unleavened Bread, and FirstFruits--or even what these days represent.

And since you mentioned Her, the Spirit is Set-Apart, not Holy. Further, according to Yahowah, people have nepesh - souls, not ruwach - spirits. Moreover, it is impossible to have the Set-Apart Spirit's witness apart from participating in the Covenant and Called-Out Assemblies, and according to Yahowah, Her testimony is focused on the Towrah. And that means, the Ruwach Qodesh condemns everything Paul wrote, and thus Christians believe.

As for me, since you mentioned it, I have no beliefs. I know, and that is vastly better. You could know too, but for that you'd have to change a lot of things.

And don't worry, I won't write to you again. I have a limit of three attempts per lost soul, unless they show that they are at least interested in knowing Yahowah. You aren't. You remain fixated on a misnomer and myth. And while that might sound harsh, you weren't able to process the fact that Sunday Worship, Church, Christmas, Easter, Lord, Bible, Old and New Testaments, discounting the Torah, Paul, Jesus, Christ, the Trinity, Gospel, Grace, and Cross are not only all wrong, but most are based upon Babylonian myths, and each of these names and concepts is contrary to the testimony of Yahowah and thus untrue. And since Christianity claims that the Towrah, Prophets, and Psalms were inspired by God and thus true, that which conflicts with God's Word must be false.

Sorry to bring you so much Good News,

Yada

Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#221 Posted : Monday, June 27, 2011 5:13:08 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
L's latest reply

L wrote:
For what you are saying to even remotely be true God the Father would have to be a liar. He promised to send a redeemer. That is found in the Torah and Psalms as well as other places in the Old Testament

Yada wrote:
I'm going to respond one last time because at least you have made a halfhearted effort to deal with 1% of what I shared with you. Albeit, your reply shows very little actual thought on your part and reveals the extent of your religious indoctrination. You view everything from the perspective of your religion and view nothing from the perspective of God's Word. It is the nature and consequence of religion, and it is why God Damns Religion.

The biggest issue here is that you are unaware that most every essential aspect of your religion is contrary to God's Word. So, unless God lied, your religion cannot be true. So, rather than understanding the central issue, rather than viewing the things I've shared from the proper perspective, rather than comparing Yahowah's testimony to the many places your religion contradicts it, your opening line inverts everything. And that is why you must leave it before you can have a relationship with God.

According to Yahowah, there is no such thing as an "Old Testament." According to Yahowah, there is only one Covenant. And remain clueless as to what Yahowah said or what Yahowsha' means in this regard. Yahowah Saves. Yahowah is our Savior. He sent part of Himself to enable His promises.

By thinking that you have been saved by "the Lord Jesus Christ," you have become fixated with a toenail clipping, trimmed and painted to mirror pagan gods of old, and have missed the actual nature of God in the process. It is exactly what Yahowsha' told you not to do.

I have reattached the Introduction to God because the Psalms I'm currently translating speak directly to the issues which are corrupting your thinking.


Man would have no hope of ever being reconciled to God without this redeemer. Job said that he knew his redeemer liveth. In Genesis right after the fall when God is speaking to Adam He says that He will put emnity between" her seed and thy seed," God the father was speaking to the serpent and telling him right then of the coming messiah.

Yada wrote:
You remain clueless as to what the Called-Out Assemblies represent--as are all Christians. And you remain clueless as to who Yahowah is and what He promised and then personally did. Because your religion has separated Yahowsha' from Yahowah and His Towrah, you have missed the promise and redeemer.

The redeemer lives. The redeemer is Yahowah.

In the Garden, Satan fooled Chawah by removing Yahowah's testimony from its context, paraphrasing it, and by misquoting Him to imply that which was not true. It is what has happened to your "bible" translations. It is the basis of Paul's epistles. It is what you are doing.

Worse, like most all Christians, you seem to think that God is willing to save someone who doesn't know His name, doesn't know what He said, doesn't know what He did, doesn't know what He wants, and doesn't respect the provisions He provided sufficiently to observe His teaching on any of them. You want God to save someone who believes a religion that has many things in common with those practiced in Babylon, Egypt, Greece, and Rome, and who ignores most everything He actually asks of us in His instructions.

Like most Christians, you ignore the Teaching of the Torah which is where the Covenant is presented and explained, and yet expect a God you do not know, whose every word and deed you have demeaned, to want to invite you into His home and live with you forever. You speak all around the Covenant in this response, and yet you only relate it to your salvation, which isn't the purpose of the Covenant. Like most all Christians focused on your salvation, you have completely missed the relational message.


Women don't have seed, this was a reference to the virgin birth, centuries before it happended. Abraham when he went to offer Issac and the angel stayed his hand, he declared, "the Lord himself will prepare a lamb." Isaiah states he was wounded for our transgression, he was bruised for our iniquity, the chastisement of our peace was upon him and by his stripes were were healed, Psalms also describes the cross and Jesus suffering, and on and on.

Yada wrote:
His name is Yahowah, not Lord. Your "bible" is a corrupted mess. And again, because you don't know or understand Yahowah's Word, Yahowah's instruction regarding the seven step plan of salvation, anything about the seven Called-Out Assembly Meetings, that salvation is secondary to the Covenant, that there are five terms and conditions to the Covenant which must be met, Yahowah's name, and Yahowsha's name, you haven't a clue who the Lamb is or even why He was called a Lamb, much less what He did on Passover and Unleavened Bread. You pick and choose isolated, paraphrased, and inaccurately translated passages, and remove them from their context to justify your religion, and as such, you are no better than Paul.


If you are blind to the cross of Christ and his suffering being declared in the Old Testament it is because you choose to be. I will tell you what Jesus said, search the scriptures for there are those who spoke of him. When Jesus said these words, the New Testament had not been written he was referring to the Old Testament, and yes that means the the Torah.

Yada wrote:
There is no word remotely akin to "cross" in Yahowah's Word. In fact, there is no word akin to "cross" in the Greek text either. And the "cross" does not save. You have been played for a fool by believing your corrupt translations. "Christ" is also errant in every possible way, as is "Old Testament." It is a Marcionic corruption.

By believing the myths, you have completely missed the message Yahowah conveyed in His Torah, Prophets, and Psalms. You have ignored what Passover, Unleavened Bread and FirstFruits represent, and thus have no hope of benefiting from them. And you have ignored what Yahowsha' said and did. Your god dies for your sins, even though God cannot die and death isn't the penalty for sin. And you remain fixated on salvation, when God is focused on His Covenant.

Until you come to recognize how hopelessly inconsistent your religion is from Yahowah's Word and Yahowsha's testimony and sacrifice, and then leave it, you will have no hope of understanding the Covenant or the Called-Out Assembly Meetings. That is why leaving Babylon is a prerequisite for participating in the Covenant. And it is why one of the requirements of the Covenant is to walk to God along the path He provided: the seven Called-Out Assembly Meetings. And without them, the Beryth and Mow'ed Miqra'ey, there is no possibility of forming a relationship with Yahowah or of salvation.

I prove every point I have raised in the Introduction to God using Yahowah's Word. If you want irrefutable proof that Yahowah can be trusted and your religion is rubbish, read it.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline VinceB.  
#222 Posted : Monday, June 27, 2011 12:53:30 PM(UTC)
VinceB.
Joined: 12/2/2010(UTC)
Posts: 228

I have to commend Yada for bending over backwards to communicate the truth as it relates to what was shared in those emails to L.

Coming out of that back ground is living proof what Yah's done in His TPP and Called-Out Assemblies is for everyone, no exceptions as long as we go the route He's chosen and not what religious leaders (like Paul) reading into what Yah was/is saying and doing, and what He is/was doing it for...we just can't come any old way, such as: "just as I am..." as the songs go.

And if she's having a hard time clearly seeing that Paul, at best was insane, at worst worked for satan - what is she going to think when you tell her the N.T. is historical and the O.T. is Yahowah's Word?

For me, a person has to want to know the truth so badly that it just doesn't matter where the truth leads as long as I know and have the truth...and letting all the pieces fall where they will was key to my discovering Yahowah as He's revealed Himself to me in paleo-Hebrew prior to man doing what man does best: wreck virtually everything man touches including God's Word.

Yah's continued best and blessings on His Called-Out Assemblies!

HWHY
Offline Yah Tselem  
#223 Posted : Tuesday, June 28, 2011 3:10:45 AM(UTC)
Yah Tselem
Joined: 3/13/2008(UTC)
Posts: 212
Man
United States
Location: Southern Wisconsin

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Good points Vince.

I think she is missing the points that are being made. She is coming across as if Yada is denying Yahowsha' and is denying that Yahowsha' fulfilled the Towrah. What she is not seeing is that one of the points is simply that his name is not Jesus. Yes, he redeemed us, yes his body died (just not on a cross but rather an upright pole), he suffered for us in Sheowl to fulfill passover, not to fulfill Ishtar/Easter. What I'm saying is that we should make sure people are understanding what we are saying(which Yada does a great job).. for instance, if we were to tell someone there was no such person as Jesus in the first century and that God can't die.. while both of those are true, it certainly doesn't help because that's a giant step when the Christian needs baby steps first.. like, yes I know you have been taught his name is Jesus, but it's actually Yahowsha' and here's why... or like - yes, God became a man just as scripture said he would and he did fulfill what scripture wrote about him, but I don't think your religion has the details right, such as it wasn't exactly a cross and God did not actually die.. let me explain...and then explain.

Some of them ARE seeking the truth, so I want to make sure I give it to them in smaller doses at first with good explanations, otherwise it is a waste. If I explain it to them clearly and they are not willing to examine the facts, then I move on..
Offline VinceB.  
#224 Posted : Tuesday, June 28, 2011 3:44:45 AM(UTC)
VinceB.
Joined: 12/2/2010(UTC)
Posts: 228

Yah Tselem wrote:
Good points Vince.

I think she is missing the points that are being made. She is coming across as if Yada is denying Yahowsha' and is denying that Yahowsha' fulfilled the Towrah. What she is not seeing is that one of the points is simply that his name is not Jesus. Yes, he redeemed us, yes his body died (just not on a cross but rather an upright pole), he suffered for us in Sheowl to fulfill passover, not to fulfill Ishtar/Easter. What I'm saying is that we should make sure people are understanding what we are saying(which Yada does a great job).. for instance, if we were to tell someone there was no such person as Jesus in the first century and that God can't die.. while both of those are true, it certainly doesn't help because that's a giant step when the Christian needs baby steps first.. like, yes I know you have been taught his name is Jesus, but it's actually Yahowsha' and here's why... or like - yes, God became a man just as scripture said he would and he did fulfill what scripture wrote about him, but I don't think your religion has the details right, such as it wasn't exactly a cross and God did not actually die.. let me explain...and then explain.

Some of them ARE seeking the truth, so I want to make sure I give it to them in smaller doses at first with good explanations, otherwise it is a waste. If I explain it to them clearly and they are not willing to examine the facts, then I move on..



QP coupled with a very strong desire to know the truth (wherever it led) was like a jolt/shock...at first I a lot of what was said in QP I rejected as blasphamy (though not all I read was...) sure, I put the stuff down and didn't touch it for about 3 months, before my hunger to know the truth was so strong, I had to pick it up again, and with an open mind start reading, praying, and writing down questions I had that would come up as I read (and I had a lot of questions, most of which were questions about what the bible says, actually it was Paul's interpretations is what was behind the questions)...but as I read along I found that my questions I was writing down were being answered by God in what came later...before I knew it, I was coming up with answers before I got confirmation in what would come 800 words later..etc etc etc

So different strokes for different folks, I guess. For me it's a matter of urgency in the sense that we got 15 years before the start of the last 7, and a lot of the world populations going to be killed between now and 2026...so the last thing christians who've been hoodwinked need, is to be cuddled and babied (I let Ruwach Qodesh prepare and soften what I say)...and it's not as if I come out like gang-busters, after all I was a totally sold out Christian before rejecting all things Paul/Sha'uwl related....so I feel their pain just from a human perspective - but I can't baby what I say because for me I want the cold hard facts and most Christians would want to know the cold hard facts too if they were where I am now...

Yah's best
HWHY
Offline Yah Tselem  
#225 Posted : Wednesday, June 29, 2011 3:51:16 AM(UTC)
Yah Tselem
Joined: 3/13/2008(UTC)
Posts: 212
Man
United States
Location: Southern Wisconsin

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
I'm not trying to say that we need to baby anything. In QP, Yada goes to great lengths to explain every detail of what he has learned and still it is hard for people to process, even when the truth is all laid out.. but some people are open minded enough to see the truth, like you did. However, if you just go up to a Christian and say "hey, Paul's a false prophit, no one named Jesus lived in the first century and he didn't die on a cross and God hates Christmas and Easter".. do you really think that's gonna get ya anywhere? I'm saying for people to be careful the way they go about it, such as starting out with only one thing.. like Paul for instance.. don't start out saying he is false prophet, but rather... hey I've been studying what Paul said compared to what God said and there are some serious contradictions and here they are.. it's better to let them examine the evidence and come to know for themselves what Paul was.. that's what Yah wants us to do anyways is to search things for ourselves, so in order to get the message out, we need to be level headed and try to see it from their perspective and what they might be thinking. Otherwise, a person would have the same type of result as a "Jesus freak" trying to convert someone to christianity by standing on the street with a sign saying repent or burn in hell.. the result would be no one would give the person enough credit to listen to what they have to say. Just like in business, you have to build up a rapport with someone before you can gain any trust so that they will listen to what you have to say. I agree, don't baby it, but at the same time think about what you're going to say. I have to say that I'm no expert on the subject though... I have been trying to reach hundreds of people via facebook and other means, but so far in several years not one person has been receptive except for my immediate family.
Offline FredSnell  
#226 Posted : Wednesday, June 29, 2011 4:28:54 AM(UTC)
FredSnell
Joined: 1/29/2011(UTC)
Posts: 874
Location: Houston, Texas

Thanks: 14 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
I can say also, that it is a fine line we walk when trying to let folks know of this ultimate deception. Just yesterday a fella I've spoken to many times about the, how and why it all got twisted up, came into my shop and said he had something for me, it was an origami swan made by his hand and it was for good luck. He wanted me to accept it just as a gift of friendship. I told him, "I appreciate the mathmatics of it, Keith, but no thanks." I didn't really know whether to or not, so I always try and air on that side of caution. I did tell him, "since I know you'll keep it, how about writing Yahs name on the wing and remember Him when you think of me." He got a laugh at that, but just then I stepped out of the shop leaving him there with one of my sons, and I heard through the door, he says to my son, "getting crazy up in here." Well all I can say is, "you best not let me hear you." I stepped right back into the shop and looked Keith dead in the eyes. "Keith, you want crazy. Crazy is, you christians letting a fat (fill in the blanks----) walk into your homes just after emerging through fire and judge your children, good or bad. And if that child is born to poor parents, he's judges that child as being naughty (since the child woke with no present.) It's you and your kind that keep perpetuating this myth along with every other myth we celebrate as some sort of tradition. Get your head out of your rearends and wake up." I know I didn't win him over yesterday, but tomorrows another day, right! Yah Tselem, never be discouraged. If we don't wake 'em up, this planet certainly is gonna try.
Shalom
Offline VinceB.  
#227 Posted : Wednesday, June 29, 2011 5:40:21 AM(UTC)
VinceB.
Joined: 12/2/2010(UTC)
Posts: 228

I hear what you're saying folks, and I'm not being like a bull in a China shop...but what I am doing is showing examples in which Yah makes know His stuff is forever (and ever means forever)...over and against Sha'uwl's stuff that has changed all that via his pagan Gott's Spell of Graces likening Yah's Torah to being in bondage or like Agar being associated with Mt. Sinai enslaving rather than it being the mercy of our God to give us a clear pathway to His home in which He does all the works and we're privileged to get to observe and cling to all He's told us, and that He's doing.

One thing I've learned is, Yahowah's a big God - we get the facts out there regardless of how it may or may not be received is what we're called to do (the missionary model of assimulating with the indigenous peoples as the followers of Jebus and/or as Sha'uwl did it, isn't the way it works)...just as the way Yahowsha' did it. He said it, made it perfectly clear, and let the pieces fall wherever they would...

My folks and siblings dont like the bluntness - but they still come around and ask more questions...after 2000 years of Paul making a mockery of and blaspheming Yahowah and His Torah is more than enough time for having played nice; we're at war and I'm going to tell folks what Yah's Word says and compare that with what Paul said and let Yah sort it out His way...if they love me, fine...if they hate me, that's OK too...at least they'd have heard the truth, which is what it's all about...

There's two apostasies, one in Yah's Torah and the other in the historical record we know as the NT, there's Yah's, and Paul's rendering of an apostasty isn't the same thing
HWHY
Offline James  
#228 Posted : Tuesday, July 5, 2011 3:48:44 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
K wrote:
Islam is a fraud. There is no doubt about it. The quran is full of evil, lies and falsehoods. Unfortunately, so is the bible. And yet, you obviously believe in it.

Logically, neither can be defended.

http://www.evilbible.com/


Yada wrote:
J,

Actually it is you who is only half right about me and half wrong about the book. While you could have followed the links to www.yadaYahweh.com or www.questioningPaul.com, a better resource yet is my current draft of the Introduction to God. While I doubt you will be able to process it unless you are a thoughtful, curious, and rational agnostic, I've attached it for your consideration.

But be forewarned. If you are logical and discerning, and if you read it with an open mind, it will turn your world upside down. Every argument you have against God will be upended, just as your every argument against religion will be sustained.

But since you were all too willing to state two errant opinions without first evaluating the evidence available to you, I don't expect much.

If you read the Introduction to God, Yada Yahweh, or Questioning Paul, I'd be open to corresponding with you. If not, you will not hear from me again.

Yada

PS I have no beliefs and I am opposed to the "bible." Moreover, no informed and rational person can compare the "bible" and the "qur'an." They are opposites.
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#229 Posted : Saturday, July 9, 2011 5:38:03 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
J S wrote:
Dear Yada,
Do you know who Karen Armstrong is?
Famous religious scholar goes around the country speaking in churches fawning and touting Mohammad.
Was a major narrator and contributor to Islam Infomercial for Mohammad and DVD broadcast on TV entitled: MOHAMMAD.
THANKS
J S


Yada wrote:
J S.

I very seldom comment on other authors, but Karen Armstrong is a special case.

I know of her, but thankfully don't know her. Based upon her books and comments, and based upon my understanding of Islam, Christianity, Judaism, the Torah, Prophets, Psalms, and so-called Christian "New Testament," (all of which I understand vastly better than she does), my conclusion is that she is one of the world's most revolting deceivers. She is a complete fraud.

My guess is that you already know this, but if not, I'm happy to be of service.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline FredSnell  
#230 Posted : Saturday, July 9, 2011 7:03:57 AM(UTC)
FredSnell
Joined: 1/29/2011(UTC)
Posts: 874
Location: Houston, Texas

Thanks: 14 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Thanks for sharing the above, James. I think we all know what, Chrislam (Christ, Islam) is, and what it's objective is. And while christianity has some pluses to it, it does help in ways to facilitate what's happening today in our world with Islam. As we all have noticed that this world sits on a pool of ooze that propells us towards one more world war, all we think of is Islam and not whats actually doing the fueling. We want to think their religions to blame, I don't, I thinks it our own religions who are at fault. We see how Islam is just so ignorant that it can't be of Yah, but christianity, at least in it's partial understanding should know when we are not wanted. So instead, to continue fueling our aggression in the name of, god and country, we will build our machine to out match yours and kill you in the name of our god and country, too fuel that appetite.. I was listening to the retired army soldier in this video and was impressed up until the very end, then the church of the Laodicea showed itself. Still the learning he offers is good.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9fOeKRZw5k
Offline James  
#231 Posted : Wednesday, July 13, 2011 7:23:49 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
M wrote:
I have been born and raised as a Moslem. A “bad Moslem” as you put it. At least this is how the rest of the Arab world view us... Us Tunisians. All my life, I have been defending Islam against these fundamentalists. That these extremists-terrorists are far from being good Moslems. The current situation in Tunisia compelled me to do more research and read more about Islam. Mind you, as I said I was born and raised a Moslem. However in the last few months following the Tunisian Revolution, a “new” form of Islam has emerged, an Islam totally foreign to what they have taught us in schools, streets etc. Now this “new” Islam is settling in in this country, some are embracing it with all their powers, others are hesitant, and many are forcefully opposing to this invasion. All hopes of democracy are now long gone. People have died for freedom and democracy, sadly another dictatorship worse than the one before is trying to take power.. YES, they are using Islam to gain power. Any one who opposes to them is Kafer (infidel) who will burn in hell, any one who will vote for them and support them, will be rewarded with paradise. Good grief!!! The country is facing economic difficulties, yet this islamic party is promising polygamy, their solution for unemployement is : women should stay at home, and leave their spot to men!!!! Have they thought about women who are the main bread winners???? No.... They are forcing supermarkets to stop selling alcohol, and promised if they ever come to power they will ban alcohol completely. They have recently put pressure on the Government to censor erotic internet sites, and they did (Dictatorship is here to stay). They plan to replace european tourism with islamic tourism (no more Germans, English, French, Hello Sudanese, Iranians, Saudi Arabians). The worse of all is that their Islamic leader is continuously praising Sudan, Iran, and Saudi Arabia for their democracy!!!! What a nightmare! He is vowing to establish sharia law in our country. Sharia Law, I have never heard of it. I looked up, and was completely shocked. These laws are against my principles and values as a human being... those who oppose to the sharia are being accused of opposing to the almighty, therefore, they will burn in hell... through facebook, I have learned other facets of Islam through the Fatwas, traditions, I must say they were all a shocker. Only now that I learned Mohammad married a 6 year old, killed jews, married and raped countless of women... and Yes they were proud of telling the world about it!! I started to have my doubts about this religion, I spent weeks doing research on the net, reading el boukhari (what a stupid guy that one!), then I stumbled on your website, Prophet of Doom... I have read a few chapters now, and what you wrote is absolutely true. Tunisia has always been a tolerant open country, now they want to turn it into an Islamic state, once it becomes islamic it will be the end of it.

P.S. please do not share my name, as any one who is opposing to islam will be persecuted and killed..... a tunisian film producer by the name of Nadia el Fani is being sued now because she publicly announced she is an Atheist... She has been attacked and verbally abused on facebook, creating attack groups against this woman who has hurt no one....


Regards,

M


Yada wrote:
Dear Miss M,

I will not share your name because you are correct, "good Muslims" who are "bad people" will try to kill you for telling the truth. They hate the truth because it is the most lethal weapon which can be wielded at any religion, and most certainly against Islam.

I am happy for you, Miss M, because the second best thing a person can do is to question their religion. Once they do this, they not only have the opportunity to free themselves of the lies and corruptions of their faith, but even more importantly, they have the opportunity to know Yahowah. Not only is He God, but as God He is so opposed to religion, that the lone prerequisite for engaging in a relationship with Him is a person's willingness to walk away from human institutions.

At this point, the most important thing you can do is finish reading Prophet of Doom. It is the best documented, and most comprehensive, contextual, and chronological presentations of Islam's five oldest and most authentic sources ever written. It will teach you what you need to know to reject the religion of your birth. And be aware, Sharia Law is simply the imposition of the teachings and behavior of Muhammad upon Muslims. That's bad because Muhammad hated women, he was a pedophile and rapist, he was a thief and kidnapper, he was a mass murderer and terrorist, and worst of all he was a liar.

Then, once you have finished reading Prophet of Doom, I want you to begin reading the attached Introduction to God. It will reveal to you who God actually is, what He wants you to know, and how He made it possible for you to engage in a relationship with Him. What you will find is that every aspect of His nature, and everything He has to say, everything that He desires, and everything He has done is the antithesis of Allah. And that is because while Yahowah is God, Allah is Satan.

Everything you have shared is consistent with what I have learned and have been telling people. "Bad Muslims" who are often "good people" are only Muslims because they were born that way. They do not know Muhammad, Allah, the Qur'an, or Hadith. If they did, they, like yourself, would no longer be Muslims as they would reject these things

And you are correct, it is fundamentalist Muslims who are taking over not only Tunisia, but most all of the lands corrupted by this horrible religion. Yahowah predicted that this would happen, that they would promote hellish conditions on earth, and that ultimately, just 15 orso years from now, they join forces to attack Israel. But they will fail.

Please read these books quietly and don't tell anyone about what you are doing, at least now. Once you complete Prophet of Doom and forever leave Islam, and once you have read the Introduction to God, and come to know Yahowah, then, and only then, you may want to share what you have learned with loved ones who you think may be receptive. But even then, be aware, until someone like yourself is willing to question and then walk away from their religion, evidence and reason will be lost on them. Your witness to such people will not be worth risking your life.

I am here, Miss M, to help you in any way I can. Feel free to ask questions. Feel free to express your concerns.

Also, you can contact me directly at email@YadaYahweh.com if you would prefer. Also, my suggestion to you is that you get a free email account which does not reveal your name.

Your friend,

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#232 Posted : Thursday, July 14, 2011 2:14:13 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
M replied to Yada's last email, so here is the continuing exchange:

M wrote:
Yada, thank you so much for your email and your support... You are right, on facebook, those who are supporting the Tunisian Islamic Party (el Nahdha) are always threatning to ridTunisia of people like me and free Palestine if ever el Nahdha came to power... how silly to think they are capable of destroying Israel, with sticks and stones and sword!!!! Sadly, they will be able to get rid of any one who opposes them in Tunisia (a few weeks ago the police arrested a few men who were manufacturing sharp swords, were these swords meant for us the Tunisians, who went out on the streets demanding freedom and democracy?). I am not going to tell any one I know about how I feel, they will hate me for sure... I once said I am against stoning and my sister (she lives in Dubai, she completly changed once she started living there) looked at me with with great fear in her eyes: how can I be opposed to a divine law!!!!! I said there is nothing divine about it, and if God decides to punish me for refusing to hurt another human being, so be it, i'd rather be in hell and not take a stone and throw it at human being!!! That is the God I have always known, a loving God, who loves all his people regardless of faith, who would judge us based on our deeds and actions. Well good deeds call for good treats, no? what is good about killing and persecuting others who are different from you??? I just hope one day they all wake up to the truth.


Yada wrote:
Dear Miss M,

Please keep reading and keep silent. You are living in a very dangerous time and place.

While it is good that you are unwilling to follow any law associated with Islam, and it is even better that you are exercising your conscience, please do not assume that you know God or that you know how He is going to judge souls. You still have a lot to unlearn and more even to learn. One day, after you have completely rejected your religion, I am hopeful that you will come to know Yahowah. And that is why I have suggested that after having completed Prophet of Doom, which will take you another 50 hours of study, that you read the Introduction to God that I attached in our last email. You are not prepared for it now, and even when you are, it will take your full focus and attention to consider what it reveals. It will be the most mentally challenging book you have ever read.

As for the real God and hell, people who do not know Him do not go to hell. There are actually three fates which await human souls. Those who engage in Yahowah's Covenant as He presented it in His Towrah, and who walk to Him along the path He provided, live forever with Him in His home, and they are adopted into His family. Those who are misled by religion or by anything else, simply die. The end of their mortal life is the end of their soul. It ceases to exist, so there is no punishment for them. But for those who promote religions, including and especially Islam, Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, or Socialist Secular Humanism, and in the process lead souls away from Yahowah, they will be judged, and if convicted, they will spend their eternity separated from God. The place of separation, however, which was made for Allah/Satan, and in which Muhammad and Paul are now living, is nothing like the hell depicted in the Qur'an.

Muslims will blame all of their failures on Jews, Christians, and bad Muslims like yourself. It is what Allah wants them to believe. So be very, very careful. Good Muslims murder far more bad Muslims than they do Jews or Christians, so yes, those swords are being sharpened to end your life. Do not make any public demands. Do not express your feelings, even around your family. Keep your eyes open and your mouth shut. Read as if your life depended upon it, because your soul does.

Your friend,

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#233 Posted : Thursday, July 14, 2011 5:34:45 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
Naseeb wrote:
I pray to GOD that you become MUSLIM. No matter how much you write against Islam, the more it spread in the world. As you and i know Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world know.
I don’t understand you Israeli people why you people hate Islam so much. As a Muslim I believe in all prophets’ right from first Hazrat Adam To last Hazrat Muhammad. But you juwes people were hijack by Satan and stop obeying God words and tried to kill Hazrat Esa. The time is not far, Inshalla form 2012 Israel will be no more and Islam will have the Victory.

At last I request you, stop this drama or you will face hell in this world and hereafter.

Naseeb Ullah Kakar


Yada wrote:
Naseeb,

Like all those indoctrinated by Islam - the most foolish religion ever conceived by man, if we can be so bold as to refer to the sexually perverted terrorist and wannabe prophet of Islam as being human - everything you wrote is either untrue or irrelevant. But it doesn't matter because you are now incapable of rationally considering the evidence.

Yahowah is the only real God. Allah is the opposite of Yahowah and thus Satan. Yahowah hates religion and does not want anyone to Muslim/Surrender.

Islam has not spread because of its merits, but only because of out of control birth rates, and compulsion. Popularity has never been a measure of truth and never will be.

Adam had no religion. He had a relationship.

Islam did not exist until Muhammad modified pagan practices in Arabia to satiate his personal lust for sex, power, and money.

I am not an Israeli. Unlike Muhammad, and you, I was not hijacked by Satan.

Esa is an Arabic transliteration of Esau, the one person Yahowah said that he hated. The Ma'aseyah's name is Yahowsha'. Esau was despised because he associated with Ishmael's religion, a precursor of the religion now claimed by Islam.

Yahowah also predicted that Muslims from around the globe would attack Israel one last time. But that battle, known as the Magog War, won't occur until 2027, and during it, Yahowah will annihilate every Muslim who takes part. It will be a "Victory," but not for Islam.

As a Muslim you continue to blame Jews for your failures. It is one of Satan's favorite ploys.

There is time after this time, but you know nothing of it. But, one thing is for certain, as a proponent of Islam you will send it with Allah. You wont, however, like the accommodations.

Next time you write someone in such an ignorant and irrational way, you may want to read their book and do some fact checking first, that way you won't appear as if you are just another thoughtless moron.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#234 Posted : Thursday, July 14, 2011 1:10:08 PM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
M's latest email to Yada

M wrote:

Hi Yada

I don't know if you have already covered this in POD, since I m not done yet reading... I came across a video of an Imam (he has a khaliji accent) who is saying that Aicha (the child wife) is in HELL, because she and other wives tried to kill the prophet. This Imam is swearing that this has happened and quoted 2 different versions of hadith (el boukhari), he is so sure that Aicha is in Hell... How can Moslems not question this Imam? like if someone told me Aicha is in Hell because she tried to kill the prophet, the first thing I d ask is why did she want to kill the prophet? yet no one has asked, but they are very happy to relate to the whole world that a wife tried to kill her husband and because of this she is in Hell. People never try to kill others for no reason, let alone killing a prophet. If Aicha tried to kill Mohammad, then she does not believe in him.. Not only her, she was with the other wives. Let's say Aicha was angry at Mohammad for stealing her childhood, but what about the other wives, why did they want him dead??? I think there is more to this story, I think Aicha did not believe he was a true prophet.. So what do you think? I can send you a link to the video if you want to. It is in Arabic though.
M


Yada wrote:
Miss M,

For your own safety I am using the "Miss M" moniker. It is out of respect for you. I trust you see it as such. I genuinely like you, care about you, and want to help you. You are a very impressive person.

Yes, I am aware of the Hadith regarding Aisha's desire to kill Muhammad. I am also aware of the reasons. She was a victim of pedophilia. And even then, Muhammad was unfaithful to her. Then to make matters worse, Muhammad accused Aisha of adultery. If I had been her, I would have killed him and done the world a service. The story of Aisha begins in the Pedophile Pirate chapter. It continues on and off through the end of the book. It will make you want to cry and scream. You will feel dirty for having been a Muslim.

Yes, you are correct. The reason the story is being told is to scare Muslim women. Moreover, you are also correct in stating that those who hear such a claim should be asking "Why?" But they aren't, because unlike you, Muslims are trained not to think, not to question.

Aisha is not in hell. Her soul no longer exists. Such is the fate of all who are abused and misled by religion. She knew that Islam was false, but she never came to know what was actually true. She was where you currently are.

You are astute in recognizing that Aisha realized that Muhammad was a fraud. There are two examples in the book. The first pertains to the mythical journey to Jerusalem. The second is when Allah allegedly revealed a surah encouraging Muhammad to take another "wife" and have sex with her more often than the others. She had her wits about her, and was a lot like you. But like you, she was in a horrible place. I feel sorry for her.

Muhammad was a wannabe prophet, not an actual prophet. He didn't get a single prediction right. Not one.

Yes, please, send me your video.

You have a great mind, Miss M, and an effective conscience. I can't wait for you to complete Prophet of Doom so that you can tackle the Introduction to God. Since I've added to it, I've reattached it.

Your friend,

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#235 Posted : Friday, July 15, 2011 5:16:29 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
Miss M's latest reply to Yada

Miss M wrote:
Thanks for the attached doc, I will only open it when I m done with POD.. But wow, what type of Islam have they taught us in school??? I don't think the Tunisian government paid too much attention to religion, all they taught us was the 5 pillars of Islam, that the Prophet was beyond any other human free of sins and wrong doings, that we have to love our neighbors, take care of old parents like they took care of us when we were kids, to give to the poor, etc etc... All good stuff that makes you good about yourself.. but now with facebook, I came to discover the real Islam, and tthis Islam scares the hell out of me.. Yes, now I am "islamophobe".
Are you scared for your life? you must be living in hiding now... I told you about the film maker who publicly announced she was an Atheist, mind you she has not attacked Islam, all she said was secularism is the best solution for Tunisia. Now they want to kill her. What is going to happen to us when the Islamic Party wins the elections?? they are paying people to vote for them, and they are promising them paradise!!!!! I heard Great Britain is funding this party, and members of the party even met with US officials in Washignton, but why are they helping a terrorist group, which is constantly talking about destroying Israel, the west and USA? Many (not the islamists of course, those who follow the islamists are uneducated young men with no bright future ahead of them), Many came to believe that the Revolution in Tunisia was not spontaneous, that it has been planned to get rid of the old dictatorship and replaced it with an authocratic dictatorship far more worse than that of Ben Ali, for the sole purpose of destroying the Arab world, Islam is weapon of mass destruction that would destroy a whole nation.


Yada wrote:
Miss M,

By the time you finish reading Prophet of Doom, and come to understand the real Islam, you will hate the religion, Muhammad, the Qur'an, and Allah. And you will feel the need to cleanse your soul of the stain of this horrible scheme. But you will be free of it.

And then with your keen mind and active conscience, you will be prepared to meet Yahowah, and hopefully choose to engage in a covenant relationship with Him. If this happens, you will have nothing to fear from Islam. You will no longer fear anything or anyone.

The Islam they taught you in school was not Islam at all, but instead a complete fake. The real Islam is rotten to the core. Its every teaching is the antithesis of Yahowah's instructions. And this is because Allah is Satan. Muhammad was demon possessed. And make no mistake, Muhammad was among the most sexually perverted and ruthlessly violent men whoever lived. As sinners go, he was king. And Muhammad is Islam. Muhammad is Allah. Muhammad is Sunnah. Muhammad is Sharia. Muhammad is the Qur'an.

What you have heard is true about Great Brittan and the United States. The leaders of these nations are as corrupt and irrational as are good Muslims. So, you cannot trust the UK or the USA. I'm sorry.

Israel will never be destroyed, no matter how many Muslims rage against the nation. Yahowah will protect Yisra'el in spite of the fact that most Yahuwdym are currently rebelling against Him and are unlovable. Look at the wars Muslims have waged thus fair and consider the results.

I do a daily radio show on the internet, and during it I predicted exactly what you are describing in Tunisia. This outcome was obvious. It is going to be hideous. As will be the case with Egypt, Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Jordan, Nigeria, the Sudan, Somalia, the UAEs, and Turkey, the rise of fundamentalist Islam will make life hellish, turning very bad situations worse. And when there is no hope, because there is no economy, education, freedom, or opportunity, Muslims will blame Jews and peaceful bad Muslims all the more for their problems. It is going to get very, very nasty, Miss M.

Islam is indeed a weapon of mass destruction. But fortunately, there is a vastly more powerful tool of mass creation.

Your friend,

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#236 Posted : Friday, July 15, 2011 5:18:09 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
Naseeb decided to attempt to enlighten Yada as to the True Islam again, here is the product.

Naseeb wrote:
Dear unknown,

From your word it seems that you are Christian. Yahowah means GOD in Bible and in Quran its Allah, so there is only one GOD. For your kind information Hazrat Muhammad was illiterate he did not know how to right and read, so how can a man illiterate makes a religion.

You said that Muhammad did it for Money and power. Dear first please read about his life and then have your opinion. He never eat twice a day, he lived in a house with only two Rooms. The roof for his house was covered with Data’s leaves and there are hundreds of profess that Muhammad was a very power man up till his death.

Dear I will give you one advice please follow it, and it will lead you to the right path.

Just read Quran once in our life with full concentration, you will find the right path and leave all this rubbish.

Naseeb Ullah Kakar


Yada wrote:
Naseeb,

I ended my response to your ignorant and irrational initial letter saying: "Next time you write someone in such an ignorant and irrational way, you may want to read their book and do some fact checking first, that way you won't appear as if you are just another thoughtless moron." You were obviously incapable of heeding that advice. Not only didn't your read the book you were criticizing, you couldn't even figure out who wrote it.

You were wrong when you called me a "juwes." Now you are wrong again, calling me a "Christian." Unable to process anything I shared with you, or that I wrote in the book, your only argument is to put the messenger in a box. That is pathetic.

Yahowah does not mean God. 'El means God. Yahowah is God's name. Yahowah's Testimony is not called the "Bible." Allah is one of several different names for Muhammad's god/gods in the Qur'an. It is not the Arabic word for god. Il and Illah are the Arabic words for god. This is one of many myths promoted by Islam, because once once comes to know that Allah is a name and not a word then Islam is known to be false. The reason for that is simple, but well past your ability to think rationally, so I won't confuse you with it.

The Muhammad was a dumb as a stone argument would be funny if Islam were not so destructive. The answer to that question is the focus of the book you have not read. Once again, the answer is obvious, and it is stated clearly in the Qur'an, but you, like most Muslims, don't realize it because your faith has precluded your ability to think. But, should I be wrong about you, read Prophet of Doom and you will understand how Muhammad blended Arab paganism with corruptions of Talmud stories to create both the Qur'an and Islam. Any idiot could have done it. But most idiots are too moral to do such a horrible thing. But not Muhammad. He was especially immoral as a pedophile, rapist, thief, kidnapper, liar, terrorist, and mass murderer. You have a hell of a prophet. Only a fool would be fooled by such a fool.

I know vastly more about Muhammad's life than you do. That is why you are beguiled and are a Muslim and why I know the truth and am not. Prophet of Doom is the best documented, most comprehensive, contextual, and chronological presentation of Muhammad's life and his revelation of the Qur'an ever written.

Speaking of the Qur'an, by any informed and rational standard it is the worst book ever written. It has no context. I is not chronological. It is a jumbled mess. It is contradictory. It is false scientifically and historically. Its primary claims are false. It is immoral. And it is a call to war against all mankind. It is Satan's book.

To demonstrate how irrational you are, consider your last letter. You stated: "I don’t understand you Israeli people why you people hate Islam so much." And then in the very same letter you wrote: "The time is not far, Inshalla form 2012 Israel will be no more and Islam will have the Victory."

Such imbecilic questions in light of such threats may seem reasonable among those confused by Islam, but among rational people, they demonstrate a person's inability to think.

You are an especially sad case. I gave you seven reasons to reject Islam in my previous letter, and yet you were incapable of processing any of them. Like most religious people, your mind is impervious to information and reason. For your sake, I hope that changes.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline tagim  
#237 Posted : Friday, July 15, 2011 8:12:53 AM(UTC)
tagim
Joined: 9/30/2010(UTC)
Posts: 218
Man
Location: westen new york

Thanks: 3 times
If it were not for the fact that Islam is the most dangerous entity in the world today, I could spend hours laughing about this idiot's letter. What a corkscrew.
Offline shalom82  
#238 Posted : Friday, July 15, 2011 10:15:27 AM(UTC)
shalom82
Joined: 9/10/2007(UTC)
Posts: 735
Location: Penna

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Just another example of islam turning the human brain into something more worthless than diarrhea. I am surprised that muslims don't have to put corks in their ears to keep the mush in their heads.
The comment about Israel reminds me of how muslims can festoon their events with posters that correlate the jews to nazis (the old star of david = swastika ). And even as they hold such posters they throw out the seig heils and say "god bless hitler!!!" and "what you need is a big oven!!!!". Whats it going to be? Do you love or hate nazis? Are jews/israelis nazis? If so then wouldn't that be a compliment since you love nazism and mein kampf is a best seller in the muslim world? Again.... If so then why do you hate them? You hate them because they are not nazis. They are a constant reminder of your shame and failure. They are the proof that your proto-nazi prophet was a liar and a fraud. Their success is a burning hot ember in your chest. Your prophet promised you success and that the Yahudim would be a wandering nationless people. You have no success and the land is taken back by the children of Israel. What a sad way to live. To live stewing in hatred and in utter hyprocrisy to deluded and stupid to even realize it. A jewish settler pulls at the skirt of a "palestinian" woman and it is an international incident. "ohhh the Yahud will not let us live with dignity!!!" A Jewish family is slaughtered by palestinian thugs who slink into their house like dogs and murder women and children and a father even as he lies with his infant daughter.....and what do you do? Pass out candy and celebrate the monsters as heroes.

Over and over again the letters to Yada and to others are a variation on a theme. Oh why do you say such terrible things and lies about islam. I pray you find the truth and become a muslim......starts out flowery and all oh boo hoo we are victims why do you pick on poor little islam....then later on is the slaughter part. We will destroy Israel...we will slaughter you....you will be in hell....Islam will be victorious....over and over again...written in different ways...but basically the same.
YHWH's ordinances are true, and righteous altogether.
Offline FredSnell  
#239 Posted : Friday, July 15, 2011 3:46:25 PM(UTC)
FredSnell
Joined: 1/29/2011(UTC)
Posts: 874
Location: Houston, Texas

Thanks: 14 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
shalom82 wrote:
A Jewish family is slaughtered by palestinian thugs who slink into their house like dogs and murder women and children and a father even as he lies with his infant daughter.....and what do you do? Pass out candy and celebrate the monsters as heroes.


More than likely the Foleys...The innocent lives that just wanted peace and got islam instead. The true version of it. So horrifying was the scene that I hate even thinking of it. Father please, how do we love those that persecute the weakest amoung us?
I would have had to stop these thugs before this happened any means possible. Those wretched dogs didn't deserve to breath the same air as the Foley Family.
Offline James  
#240 Posted : Sunday, July 17, 2011 8:20:47 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
KK wrote:
I saw your website and articles. I know what is Quran 2.56, Sabhi Bukhri, Sahi Muslim, or Tabrai

but what is Ishaq ?



--
How will you be when son of Mary descends amongst you (Muslims) and he will judge people by the Law of Quran and not by the Law of Gospel....Prophet Mohammad PBUH


Yada wrote:
KK

Second only the the Qur'an, Ishaq's bio of Muhammad, called the Sirat Rasul Allah, is Islam's oldest "scriptural" resource. It was compiled within 150 years of Muhammad's death. Like the Qur'an, it is a collection of oral reports from Muhammad and his contemporaries, albeit, unlike the Qur'an, the Sira is chronological.

Muhammad will be among the first to be judged by Yahowsha', and his penalty will be among the harshest. There is however, no law of the Qur'an, and most certainly no law of the Gospels. Moreover, Muhammad was not a prophet and he knew nothing of peace. But besides that, the quote is spot on.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline Richard  
#241 Posted : Monday, July 18, 2011 4:54:05 AM(UTC)
Richard
Joined: 1/19/2010(UTC)
Posts: 695
Man
United States

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 7 post(s)
Yada wrote:
Muhammad will be among the first to be judged by Yahowsha', and his penalty will be among the harshest. There is however, no law of the Qur'an, and most certainly no law of the Gospels. Moreover, Muhammad was not a prophet and he knew nothing of peace. But besides that, the quote is spot on.


Razor sharp sarcasm has its place, and that slice is perfectly placed.
Offline James  
#242 Posted : Friday, July 22, 2011 4:16:14 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
BB wrote:
Dear Mr Yada,

Aren't you exagerrating a bit? You 're not being objective but rather subjective. Which university gave you the platform to write this. Each human being has two sides, but what were the motives for the prophets to spread their message on the earth. I mean the earth is not only the United States of America. But the earth represents the whole earth including all countries, all tribes, all religions, all beliefs and all political systems including democracy.

You suffer from a terrible disease that's calles patriottism and this disease has made you blind. Why don't you see that the prophet came for only one message like all other prophets before him.

There's no God but God Allah. And do you know that in Arab also Christian people and Jewish call their Lord Allah. Shame on you. You have little respect for others. If you want to study this religion learn from Nasiridun Al-Albani. A great islamic scholar who studied all books all hadieths in an objective way. He wrote countless books and died at the age of 86. Read Uthaymeen and yes this man had a conversation with Bin Laden and praised him. I don't know why but this is also a great scholar in islam. He wrote so many books. They are specialists in hadith. Since you never studied Arabic and do not know what a sanad is, don't start naming and shaming hadiths of which you don'tknow if they're false and true and giving them out of context. I hope you even know what a sanad is. In islam we call it plagiarism if you can't name the sanad of a hadith. You just start giving some random topics to blackmail people and a religion and you don't know what the consequences are. You're constructing a new ideology in favor of your pattriotism that's no better than those who were in favor of the apartheid or the holocaust and this grieves me deeply.


Yada wrote:
BB,

There was no reason to exaggerate. All I had to do to understand Islam was study the five oldest Islamic sources and use them to reorder the Qur'an chronologically and then set it into the context of Muhammad's life. The resulting conclusions were obvious, irrefutable, and undeniable. You just don't like them.

Muhammad wasn't a prophet because he never got a single prediction right. But as for his motives, they are obvious. Read Prophet of Doom and you too will know them.

The US has nothing to do with Prophet of Doom. If you had read the book you would have known that I am not a patriot. In fact, I'm opposed to patriotism. I am also opposed to religion and politics. But unable to refute any of the evidence contained in Prophet of Doom, you like all unthinking Muslims try instead to slander the messenger. It is pathetic. It demonstrates that your religion has made it impossible for you to think rationally.

Muhammad had nothing in common with the prophets before him. And his message was the antithesis of theirs. As such, Islam's foundational claim is false. That is why I say that it is impossible to be an informed and rational Muslim.

Actually, Allah is not God. Yahowah is God. They are opposites. And by choosing the name Allah, Muhammad proved that his god was a fake. But to understand this argument, you'd have to read the Towrah.

It is irrelevant that Christians are deceived. And quoting them does not help your argument.

Why would anyone want to "learn a religion" from a scholar when they can learn from the exact same sources the scholar is required to use. There are only five Islamic sources written within 200 years of Muhammad's death. Everything that can be known about Muhammad, the Qur'an, Allah, and the creation of Islam is contained in those five books. And they are the books upon which Prophet of Doom is based. Too bad you didn't read it before you so foolishly criticized it.

Islam cannot be any different than Muhammad and the five books which expose his words and deeds. As a result, Islam is rotten to the core, false, immoral, counterproductive, and hopelessly violent.

Yada


BB wrote:



Please do not translate Arabic if you're not familiar with it.

Yada wrote:
It seems to be a universal quality of Muslims to be moronic. I did not translate the Qur'an. If you had read the book you would have known that. The citations of the Qur'an in Prophet of Doom are a blend of the five most respected Islamic translations of the Qur'an. Period.

Moreover, every important concept presented in the Qur'an, including Qur'an, is Hebrew. Since you are not familiar with it, you are again making a fool of yourself. Moreover, the paleo Arabic of the Qur'an is so lacking in vowels and punctuation, it has to be subjectively supplemented and then translated into more modern Arabic. So you are reading a translation.


Over 14 centuries translations of Arabic in Arabic has become an art and there are even special classes for it.

Yada wrote:
This is not true. If you had read the source material appendix to Prophet of Doom you would know that written Arabic is not 14 centuries old. If you understood its origins, however, you wouldn't be a Muslim.



All these imams and sheikhs are specialists in this and have reached agreements on the proper way of explaining these matters in Arabic and you come just in one website giving false explanations. Please do not do this. Because it's not good. It's not true and it's false and I am being polight with you and lenient.

Yada wrote:
You obviously know nothing of the script in which the earliest extant manuscripts of the Qur'an were written. And you don't know that 100% of the Islamic quotations in Prophet of Doom were from the most respected paleo Arabic scholars the world has ever known--which means that you didn't read the book. So, learn before you criticize. Otherwise your opinions are neither right, true, nor "polight."


Sahih International sahih means correct in Arabic
And who believe in what has been revealed to you, [O Muhammad], and what was revealed before you, and of the Hereafter they are certain [in faith].

Yada wrote:
There is no such thing as "correct in Arabic." No language is perfect and none translates perfectly. And that includes the transition from paleo Arabic to modern Arabic. So, here are the five most respected translations of the verse you are questioning, all of which are available to you in parallel at the Prophet of Doom site (http://prophetofdoom.net/Quran_Surah_002.Islam):

2.4.
AA Who believe in what has been revealed to you and what was revealed to those before you, and are certain of the Hereafter.
NQ And who believe in (the Qur'ân and the Sunnah) [] which has been sent down (revealed) to you (Muhammad Peace be upon him ) and in [the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel), etc.] which were sent down before you and they believe with certainty in the Hereafter. (Resurrection, recompense of their good and bad deeds, Paradise and Hell, etc.).
PK And who believe in that which is revealed unto thee (Muhammad) and that which was revealed before thee, and are certain of the Hereafter.

SH And who believe in that which has been revealed to you and that which was revealed before you and they are sure of the hereafter.

YU And who believe in the Revelation sent to thee, and sent before thy time, and (in their hearts) have the assurance of the Hereafter.



Look how you have falsified this simple verse:

POD wrote:
Qur'an 2:4 "Whoever believes in (the Qur'an and Sunnah) which has been sent down to you (Muhammad) and in that which was sent to those before your time (the Torah and Gospel), have the assurance of the Hereafter."

Although there are a thousand reasons to discard the Qur'an, this is one of the best. Allah is taking credit for prior scripture, saying that it should also be believed. Since the Torah and Qur'an are irreconcilably different, the order is impossible. It's like telling someone to be a democratic capitalist and a totalitarian communist at the same time.


Yada wrote:
The paragraph you quoted is about half way through the Anti-Semite chapter of Prophet of Doom (http://prophetofdoom.net/Prophet_of_Doom_14_The_Anti-Semite.Islam).

Other than to correct the grammar from "And who believe" to "Whoever believes" the vast majority of the words are a direct copy of the Nobel Qur'an which claims to be the most literal, and all of the other words either came from it or the other four translations. Therefore to call it "falsified" is a falsification. It is as accurate a translation as the most respected paleo-Arabic scholars are capable of rendering.

But, your problem is that you don't understand the merits of the commentary which follows. It is a simple statement, albeit lethal to Islam. The Qur'an is the antithesis of the Torah, and therefore, Allah/Muhammad lied. It is that simple.

If there is to be a next time, BB, read before you write. Think before you criticize. Consider being rational instead of religious.

If you are capable of being a rational person, a moral person, you will write me back and admit that everything you have accused me of is wrong. And then you will commit yourself to actually reading Prophet of Doom. Then you will write me again and thank me for freeing you from the myth of Islam. That is of course if your religion will allow you to be rational.
Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#243 Posted : Friday, July 22, 2011 5:04:57 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
BB's latest reply
BB wrote:
Dear Mr Yada,

Your credibility is zero. Even if you're right which I do not believe. You're way of exposing and analyzing data is not scientific because you're being to emotional rotten, false, immoral and corrupt. That's for your accountability. You really did never study Arabic and if you do not consider the scholars in the Islamic tradition than you're analysis is corrupt, because these scholars have come to their findings after thorough analysis and spent their whole lives by analyzing all the sources in the Arabic language. The classical arabic language of today is in no way comparable to the language of today and has many complex meanings. And the fact that you're doing your document analysis this way directly from English sources does yourself no good.

Your analysis is false and I can prove it for every little bit that you wrote. All the positive data is ommited for your sake and pattriotic and secular agenda. The best among you are those in good conduct. In discussions I would personnally someone with good manners because I don't take you seriously because you're only and one aim is to blackmail and destruct. Every one can write this way about any religion by using markers which suit one's own political agenda.

Who ever is really convinced of his own opinion and that all the others are no good, is himself being deceived. I really hope that you will wake up to see the light. In Arabic I hope you will see the Noor. But you even dismissed the scholars and all those one billion muslims on the earth and their way of living. Your study objectif but rather overemotional and subjectif. Make a good etnographic research by interviewing these people and their scholars because the way you interpret hadith and quran is truly false. I can prove it, but can you.

I hope you will make a good thorough research. One of the top scholars in social science in ethnography is Michael Agar. Consult him and he will advise you. Because never think that in your own you will be succesfull and one basis of you're objectif data make your conclusions. Because you're findings are based on nothing.

Good luck


Yada wrote:
BB

As is the case with all who are poisoned by religion, BB, you are incapable of considering any evidence which contradicts your faith, even when that evidence comes exclusively from your wannabe god and wannabe prophet. Your religion has made it impossible for you to think rationally. So, there is nothing I, or anyone, can do to awaken you from the myth of Islam. In the end, you will have squandered your life, and you will lose your soul. I'm sorry, but it did not have to be that way.

A thousand Muslims have bragged that they could disprove the 1000 pages of evidence collected from Islam's five oldest and most credible sources presented in Prophet of Doom without contradicting their wannabe god and wannabe prophet. But none have found so much as a single material error in the book, and to prevail, they would have to disprove the entire book. Your attempt was more flawed than most, your grasp of the relevant facts is more limited than most, and your reasoning is even less developed than most, so you will not succeed. But yet you brag. It is one of Islam's most telling attributes (as it mirrors Satan's persona).

I'm sorry that I could not help you see the obvious lie of your religion. It was screaming out to you in the very verse you attacked, and yet you remain blind to it. The Torah is the opposite of the Qur'an. They differ in every possible way. Yahowah is the opposite of Allah. They differ in every possible way. So, since Allah claims to be the god who inspired the Torah, since he claims that his Qur'an confirms the Torah, the only rational and informed conclusion is that Allah lied about the single most important claim regarding his, the Qur'an's, and Islam's credibility. But to understand this, you'd have to know what the Torah actually says and what Yahowah is actually like, and then conduct a rational comparison. And yet your religion precludes you from doing either, which is why you continue to believe a foolish lie.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#244 Posted : Monday, July 25, 2011 2:11:27 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
R wrote:
Hello,
my name is Rahman Zaza. I'm Ex-muslim who has converted to Atheism at the age of 12. I was raised in Beirut, a beautiful city which was invaded, plundered, and utterly destroyed many a time by the Israelis and their "puppets", the American administration. I've also witnessed women raped, bodies mutilated, children piled and cast across the sidewalks by the hundreds (Sabra & Shatila Massacres in 1882), that make the atrocities committed by the American Forces in Abu Ghreib prison in Iraq look more like a picnic, again by the Israelis, Americans, and their allies in Beirut.

If you claim to have visited over 120 countries as you purportedly mentioned in your book, then the least I would expect from you is a man of intellect, who have written and understood the history of that region and will not resort to crooked means by trying to insult the intelligence of his readers with passages like:

"They left their homes to fight infidels; they stole our planes, ravaged our economy, and slaughtered innocents in the name of Allah. They even confessed to the crime. Yet not a single national spokesperson or politician has had the courage to hold Islam accountable."

Who ravaged your economy Mr. Winn? Who's responsible for $5.3 Trillion printed out of thin air by the Federal Reserve in less than 3 years to cover the organized loot of Wall Street against the American Nation? Where have you been when $6 trillion of the American People's wealth was lost in the Real Estate Market? Who is responsible for the devaluation of the USD by almost 50% in two years? I do invite you to check Congressman Ron Paul's questions to the Federal Reserve Chairman B. Bernanke in the US House Financial Services Committee Meeting, it's on youtube.

Unless the Islamic terrorists are controlling your economy and running Wall Street in its entire financial system, the whole passage from your book can only be treated with disregard and neglect.

You're whining about a couple of planes that were "stolen" from you? Mr. Winn, You give me the awful impression of someone who has never read the conclusions of the 9/11 commission report. But if you're referring to the planes that were highjacked by those maniacs in the Olympics in the 1970s and whatnot, then yes, I partially agree, but what about a whole LAND the size of Palestine that was stolen from them? What about hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, Jordanians, Lebanese, Israelis and Egyptians that were slaughtered like scapegoats for the inane idea written by some psychopath Rabbi some 3000 years ago about the Jewish State in Palestine?

If you have the guts to criticize Islam, St. Paul, then I presume you're a freethinker who also knows for a fact that the Bible itself is nothing more than a mesmerizing soup of image and metaphor into which any fantasy can be read, and by which any horror can be justified. You are also the victims of the Judeo-Christian faith, and that everything the Bible says is true, and that ISRAEL is the promised land that Yahweh has given to the Jews. So what are you defending here?

You see, the whole argument is stupid and implies that the author has never tried to delve into the history of Arabs in general, ever since the Great Arab Revolution in 1916. Yes, Islam contains passages of terror no one denies it. Muhammad was definitely not a prophet in my opinion, or a moral teacher, but a great leader, just like Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar etc.., only with a much greater influence on its followers. You've never insulted me as an ex-muslim, I have a much better prophet now, his name is Christopher Hitchens, but you did insult me as an Arab, who has a very noble cause of liberating his land, at all expense, and this is where the book fails in my opinion.

Now let me rephrase that passage of your book, from an Arab point of view:

"They left their homes to fight terrorists; they stole our OIL, ravaged our economy, and slaughtered innocents in the name of FREEDOM. They even confessed to the crime (ABU GHREIB). Yet not a single national spokesperson or politician has had the courage to hold GW. BUSH accountable."

Do you know who I'm talking about?
Thank you


Yada wrote:
R,

You may have rejected Islam, but you carry its legacy with you. While it is better to be an atheist than a Muslim, you haven't come very far if you blame Israelis and Americans, not Muslims, for destroying Beirut. That has to be among the least informed and rational statements I've ever read.

There are many villains when it comes to America's deficits, but there is little question that $4 trillion has been squandered flailing at the symptoms responsible for 9-11, so my statement remains accurate. That is not to say that I don't support your accusation against the Fed. Americans have more than one enemy. I often write and speak against the Fed.

If I were political, I would be a Libertarian like Paul, but I am as opposed to politics as I am to religion. And Paul is too religious for my taste. Moreover, America is way too far gone to be saved.

Your means to discard Prophet of Doom is especially irrational, and indeed ignorant. It is nothing more or less than the best documented, most comprehensive, chronological, and contextual presentation of Islam's five oldest and most reliable sources. By correctly presenting the formation of Islam it accurately presents and completely condemns one of the world's foes. It was not designed to present all of them. And the fact that it doesn't present all of them does not diminish its credibility or value.

I do an even more comprehensive job exposing and condemning Christianity in other books, and deal with the Fed and Wall Street in my radio program. There is a time and place for all relevant things.

Your understanding of history is also rooted in Islam, equal parts ignorant and racist. So long as you are this misguided, there is no value in conducting a conversation with you.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#245 Posted : Monday, July 25, 2011 2:12:38 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
W wrote:
What do you get from spreading hate and intolerance, from spreading lies.....has it made your life any better?, has it brought peace to yourself.....hate is a disease that will eat you gradually until you have nothing to feel...


Yada wrote:
Since Prophet of Doom is the best documented an most comprehensive book ever written on the five oldest Islamic sources, if it is hateful and intolerant, if it is spreading lies, your religion is all of these things. It has nothing to say that wasn't previously said or done by Muhammad.

Yes, exposing lies and condemning hateful religions has made my life and many others better. It has brought me peace, and indeed a greater measure of peace to others.

Hate isn't a disease. For example, it is appropriate to hate a disease like Islam. Yahowah hates Islam and so do I.

Not hating that which is bad is what eats people up.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#246 Posted : Monday, July 25, 2011 2:13:34 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
DB wrote:
U guys are nothing but a bunch of ignorant fools!


Yada wrote:
DB

U R so smart to call the best documented, most comprehensive, contextual, and chronological presentation of Islam's five oldest and most credible sources, all of which focus on Muhammad's words and deeds, ignorant and foolish. I agree, Muhammad was ignorant and Islam is foolish.

So it is nice that we had this chat. Thanks for writing!

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#247 Posted : Monday, July 25, 2011 2:21:25 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
PL wrote:
Hey, Yada

It is a few years ago you made ​​this analysis: http://prophetofdoom.net...Terrorism_Timeline.Islam So my question to you is: how many potential jihadists do you think it is today? Now that we are bombing in Libya. And Gaddafi threatens to destroy Europe. And he will use mass Muslim Immigration – free passage for maybe millions of Muslims who will turn Europe into an Islamic wasteland even faster than it’s already becoming one. http://www.youtube.com/w...;feature=player_embedded

PL


Yada wrote:
Yes, PL, I remember doing that calculation as if it were yesterday. The only things which have changed are that the West has increased the number of good Muslims (aka bad people who become active jihadists) by bombing Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Yemen, Somalia, and Libya, and most all polls now show that between 70 and 75 percent of Muslims are now fundamentalist. Moreover, the degree to which already jihad prone Muslims have adopted the most fundamental aspects of Islam has also increased substantially. So, when Gog unites the Muslim world, or Magog Federation, some 10 to 15 years from now, you should expect to see a billion or more jihadists.

While they will not conquer Europe or the United States, they will destroy what is left of both. That said, the West is facing other foes besides Islam.

Yada


PL wrote:
"That said, the West is facing other foes besides Islam."

Are you thinking about Anders Behring Breivik, which has killed more than 93 people? He should have said in interviews that he belongs to an international "Christian" military order (The Knights Templar) who fight against Islamic oppression. Have you heard anything about this group?
http://www.vg.no/nyheter...ikkel.php?artid=10080726

http://translate.google.no/#no|en|

It irritate me that the media and the police call him a Christian fundamentalist! Something he can not possibly be.

PL


Yada wrote:
PL,

I am opposed to Christianity, but the media presenting him as a Christian is unfair. In fact I'm going to begin my radio show tomorrow addressing this media hypocrisy. He was a freemason which is where you are getting the knights templar connection.

I see Christianity as as big a foe as Islam and I see Socialist Secular Humanism as the biggest foe of all. So, these are the three evils I see as collectively destroying our world over the next 20 years.

If you want to know why I am so opposed to Christianity I'd be glad to send you my most recent book. It does to Christianity what Prophet of Doom did to Islam, but by using Yahowah's Testimony.

Yada


PL wrote:
You have changed my life in a positive way. And I have learned a lot from you through the POD and I want to learn more, so I accept your offer.

"In fact I'm going to begin my radio show tomorrow addressing this media hypocrisy." On Yada Yahweh Radio?

Thank you


Yada wrote:
PL,

I have attached the most life-changing project I've ever been part of. It is called an Introduction to God. It will require your undivided attention, but it will be worth the investment of your time. If you read it you will come to know Yahowah as He revealed Himself and you will understand exactly what He is offering, and where He is presenting His offer.

The book is not yet completed as I'm still adding to the Towrah section and I have yet finalized the Invitation or Prophecy sections. But there is more than enough here to transform your life in a very positive way. That said, the biggest challenge will be a willingness to leave religious myths behind as they are exposed and rejected. Most find this nearly impossible, even when it is God Himself telling them to do so.

Yes, I will be addressing the Oslo incident on Yada Yah Radio tomorrow morning at 8.00 am Pacific Daylight Time. But like all of the shows, it will be available later in the day by way of the archives.

I am not pleased with the media's portrayal of this man as a Christian or his approach to Islam. The only appropriate weapons to wield are words, and by killing he did the cause of exposing and condemning Islam a great disservice. After a thirty minute review of the news, we spend the next hour discussing the Introduction to God.

Also a friend is going to join me tomorrow to discuss pedophilia and sexual misconduct in the Roman Catholic Church.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#248 Posted : Monday, July 25, 2011 11:50:04 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
W from the post above replied to Yada

W wrote:
Did you bother to pick up a book yourself and research... Forget the writer, you yourself... Put hatred aside and just once take a look rationally. Do it for 5 mins... Islam is just a religion but carrying so much hatred for anything which you are totally ignorant of is unhealthy. Verify with me why you feel this way... Direct your hatred towards me and just open up why you feel this way...


Yada wrote:
How is it that you can write, but cannot read?

To write the 1000 page book on Muhammad I invested 10,000 hours studying the five oldest and most credible Islamic sources. The entire book exists to present and comment upon what is revealed that Muhammad did and said as recorded in those sources. So put your hatred aside and read all about what your hateful wannabe prophet and his hateful wannabe god said in their own words.

Islam is a religion, the most evil, counterproductive, obviously false, grotesquely immoral, and violent religion ever created by man. That is why God and I hate it.

I "verified" why I hate Islam with the 1000 pages of Islamic quotations in Prophet of Doom. Read it.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#249 Posted : Tuesday, July 26, 2011 7:39:38 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
W's latest email exchanges with Yada

W wrote:
No peace ever comes out of this hatred, not just for religion, for
anything.
I personally respect jews, Christians, hindus, very much for their
religion. I was once like you...i used hatred..got emotional over
this...let my anger, my hatred control my actions... it just made me
weak...it makes everyone weak.

Just sit in a quiet room for 1 hour...and truly ask yourself... No
Religion will ask you to hate the other...its the people that ask you to
hate it...but you are better than them... There is no hatred in God...
Hatred is only with Satan... Even your own religion will not ask you to
hate anyone...it is the people that made us hate others...it is their
weak
feelings, but you can and have the capability to emerge as a stronger and
respective person.
You are right...hate isnt a disease but it is even worse...its very
painful....Sit alone for a moment...clear your mind and forget the book
Prophet of Doom....You yourself as a individual what do you think and why
do you think that? ask these questions and you will discover strength
inside you....

I dont know why i have this strange feeling....but I would love to be
your
friend.....I have no intention of converting you incase your wondering ;)
lol

Have a blessed day and May God protect you.

Tell me more about Judaism...I would be very much interested if you want
to talk to me about it.

Regards


Yada wrote:

The opposite of what you write is true. Peace comes when evil and violent
religions are exposed and condemned. Moreover, you cannot be a Muslim and
not hate Jews and Christians according to Allah. So the only person you
are
fooling is yourself.

Islam orders you to hate and kill Christians and Jews, so you are either
hopelessly ignorant or completely dishonest. Either way, talking with you
is
a complete waste of time.


W wrote:
Hahahaha nobody orders me to be muslim and hate any other religion... Who
told you that? :)


Yada wrote:
ou obviously haven't read the Qur'an, or the Hadith, and you don't
understand either. I see a trend emerging. You don't read.


W wrote:
I have read and I don't see what you see.

I just want to know one thing and one thing only... When did you start to hate islam? Please share this with me. I will listen and discuss unbiased.


Yada wrote:
Once you have read Prophet of Doom from beginning to end, all 1000 pages of evidence, you will hate Islam. Feel free to write me again if you read the book. Otherwise having a discussion with you will be a poor use of my time. You are not currently well enough informed.

Again the link to the first page of the book is: http://prophetofdoom.net...hammads_Own_Words.Islam.

It is free in its entirety in HTML, PDF, and MP3.


W wrote:
I will read your book with complete detail....but you have to promise something..that you will remain unbiased when we discuss . I will do the same. I believe this is the most civilized of discussion and debate. I will get back to you when i have read more of the book, in the mean time, i want you to do the same by reading the article i posted below..read it in neutrality not in hatred. At the end what both of us want is be rational and have facts with us.

Read this:

http://listverse.com/200...conceptions-about-islam/

I will finish the book and then we can discuss but only if you are willing to discuss and not shrug off anything i say.


Regards,

W


Yada wrote:
I will never be unbiased Waleed. I know the truth. I've done the research. I've exercised good judgment regarding the evidence. And I hate pedophilia, rape, incest, adultery, mass murder, terrorism, lying, stealing, religion, satanism, kidnapping, and the slave trade, all things Muhammad was engaged in according to the earliest Islamic sources.

So, while I will discuss the facts with you rationally once you have read the evidence, I will not be unbiased. The facts lead to an irrefutable and undeniable conclusion. Muhammad was a repulsive human being and he lied about and in the Qur'an.


W wrote:
Thanks, I don't think you will find many people who actually love those things you mentioned, lol and plus all that was happening was very common in medieval times.

On an unrelated case I want to share an interesting story with you to tell you more myself. I am sure you know about the sects of islam, sunni and Shi'te. I don't consider myself either, I'll tell you just the basics of it. After the Prophet's (pbuh) death, there was uncertainty about who will be the successor of the empire. Ali (RA) was his son in law and he had companions mainly Abu bakr (RA) and umar ( RA). There was a dispute and Islam was divided, under Ali came shi'tism and under Abu bakr came sunni. After researching I was more supporter of shias idea that Ali was successor but shi'tism became a different religion these days...did u notice the big knife and headband....it's a way to mourn the deaths of Ali's successors Hussein and Hassan. Because a different story lay in the background.

When the Prophet (pbuh) died, umar refused he was dead....funeral was delayed because he was a powerful man and people feared him, he stopped anyone from even saying that the prophet passed away. Abu bakr was out of city, until he came back umar did not allow anyone to proceed with the funeral. Then Ali took the prophet's body along with his wife and they washed him to prepare for funeral and they were alone. Imagine the founder of Islam with an empire but only 2 people at his funeral as everyone one else was in the council discussing who will succeed. Abu bakr ordered umar to do something. After funeral umar entered Ali's house and pushed the door hard which hit the daughter of the Prophet, she was pregnant and then threatened Ali. After this it's a long story what went on....

It still goes on imagine....

Anyways thank you for your time for reading this story..please share wit me something from Judaism if you can,

Hope you have a nice day ahead.

W


Yada wrote:
The answer to your question is that Muhammad was not a prophet so it did not matter who controlled Islam after his death. It's a shame that Islam did not die with him. The sunni shia debate misses the point.

If you hate the things on the list, then you will hate Muhammad because he was guilty of all of them. And while others were guilty of some of them, they didn't start religions based upon these things. So, that makes Muhammad especially vile.

I hate Judaism as much as I hate Islam and Christianity, so while I may be able to answer your questions about it, I don't agree with the rabbinical position.

If your interest is in Yahowah, I'll share what I know about Him (which is a great deal) after you have finished Prophet of Doom.
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#250 Posted : Wednesday, July 27, 2011 1:14:09 PM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
Latest exchange with PL

PL wrote:

Hi YY,
I see that the media tries to blame this terrorist act on those who criticize Islam.

Here in Norway, the media is hungup in the number of times AndersBehring Breivik quoted by RobertSpencer, etc. (in Breivik`smanifesto)
http://www.youtube.com/w...;feature=player_embedded

But if I say it's Bukhari The Prayerof Fear, "Allahu Akbar" which isquoted the most when it comes toterrorism and murder, not you orRobert Spencer! The entire 17,506 times since 9/11. http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/ And over the last 1400 years we are talking about perhaps hundreds of millions of times.
The Media should be addressingthis issue, something I never think they will do.

Am I on to something here, orwhat YY?

PL


YY wrote:
I devoted 45 minutes to this on monday on my Yada Yah radio show, demeaning the media for their coverage of this event. The media coverage is far more lethal than any bullet Breivik shot.

I have no respect for RS, but to blame him for telling the truth about Islam is absurd in the extreme. There were problems associated with ABB, but they cannot be blamed on RS or Christianity, but instead on the world's collective inability to think rationally or respond morally.

YY


PL wrote:
Okay, I was only online for the last 15 minutes of radio program .. And I have not been able to play back the recording until today...
You are fabulous! I wish there were more people like you.

YY wrote:
Today's program was very controversial. I usually review the news and then present a segment on Yah's Word from the book I'm completing called the Introduction to God. Today I read a woman's letter and shared how easy it is to misinterpret the Torah.


Are there any good presidential candidates in America as you see? Allen West looks to have good knowledge about Islam, at least.
But I do not know if he wants to fight Islam (evil) around the world with bombs and bullets or what..

YY wrote:
There are none. Both parties are equally bad. And Islam is but one of many things which make America unsavable.

Most of those who speak out against Islam politically here in America favor bombs and bullets rather than evidence and reason.


What kind of president do the world need to limiting the damage? Should he not at least support God's chosen people in Israel?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1vICEf1TgA

YY wrote:
He should be like David, a man who knew and loved Yah's Towrah.


Last fall, 46% of children who began in the 1st class in Oslo schools, were Muslims. Some are more than 90% Muslims. We are struggling tremendouslyyou see, and I can understand that it clicks for some, but I will never encounterany terror against people anyway. But what does Yahweh say about self-defense when they attack us? I think we are the "next Kosovo."

YY wrote:
The news claims that Muslims are just 3% of the Norwegian population, but that won't last long with the numbers of children you are citing. It will be over for you within 10 to 15 years.

Yahowah hates all religion and wants us to be hostile to it and those who promote it. But he wants us to do as He has done which is to fight evil with evidence and reason. He very seldom encourages killing, and when He does it is only in Yisra'el.


- "Oslo is to be called Medina
Norway is one of the first goals of the Islamic revolution. "The IslamicLiberation Party" to Oslo to renamed to Medina, argues, "Norway Today"
The controversial Christian newspaper "Norway Today" reports that one ofthe leaders of "The Islamic Liberation Party," Sheikh Issam Amira hasproclaimed that Norway is among the first countries in the revolution list. Thishe will be revealed in a speech at the mosque on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem for a short time ago. Deliverance Party spread an ideology that issimilar to Al-Qaeda, and calls for Islamic revolution and the destruction of"non-believing nations and religions," they write.
Islamic world state
"Norway Today" argues that Deliverance Party will establish a world Islamicstate with Jerusalem to be capital.
- Denmark and Norway are the first goals of the Islamic Revolution in Europe,says Sheikh Issam Amira. After a revolution in Norway should not be calledthe capital Oslo, but Medina. Medina in Saudi Arabia is the second holiestcity in Islam after Mecca.
- After that the party will fight a holy war to spread Islam to the rest of Europe, until the revolution when the original city of Medina. Then the two townstogether under Islamic flags, the party leader said." http://www.aftenposten.n...uriks/article1163976.ece http://translate.google.no/#no|en|

YY wrote:
That being the case, then your home grown terrorist did his foe a great service. Breeding like rabbits and fleeing the countries they have already ruined, and now invading yours, they will absolutely destroy it. No one in your nation has the will, knowledge, or understanding of how to stop them, and ever if there were such a person, too much damage has been done to average Norwegians by their socialist indoctrination to do anything about it.


"I’d suggest developing some survival skills. Learn how to live outdoors, live off the land. Buy camping equipment and learn how to use it. Stock up on foods packaged to keep indefinitely. Learn how to hunt and trap." I have followed your advice and teach my children even those who I am uncle to.While we had alot of fun of course.

YY wrote:
I have a better suggestion. Focus on the Torah. Engage in the Covenant. Walk to Yah along the path He provided. Then your survival will be assured. You will get to campout with God.


One last question, have you ever written in Yada Yahweh something about how we should be able to see the sin of the world through the eyes of the Jews or something like that? I believe I read something like this, but I do not remember in what chapter it was. Or did I just dream this... hmm

PL

YY wrote:
Yes. The sin of the Yahuwdym is ignoring the Torah. The world has followed them--especially Christians, Muslims, and Socialist Secular Humanists. The result is hell on earth.

I have reattached the Introduction to God. It is your best survival guide.

YY

Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Users browsing this topic
8 Pages«<34567>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.