logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline sirgodfrey  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, January 11, 2011 10:04:44 AM(UTC)
sirgodfrey
Joined: 10/2/2008(UTC)
Posts: 512
Location: North Carolina

I thought I would share this exchange between myself and a guy I know. We knew each other before I ran away from christianity, and speak from time to time as he engineers the music that I make. We had a discussion the last time we physically met concerning several things, and the name of Yah came up during. I emailed him an excerpt of Yadas writing concerning Yah's name because of the aforementioned discussion, particularly because he contended that there is evidence that it cannot be accurately uttered or vocalized.

Me:

"Yo whas up mate. I was doing some reading and came across this excerpt concerning God's name. I am simply sharing this because I quickly remembered that we had discussion concerning the Most High's name, and you commented that "YHWH" could not be pronounced. I thought maybe this information could shed some light on our previous discussion. It is a bit lengthy, but it is also informative and enlightening."

C's response:


"Godfrey, thanks for the lengthy response, lol. Seriously bro, I appreciate
your heart and efforts to challenge and encourage me in my faith, just as I
have challenged and encouraged you in yours. I first want you to know that
it was never my intention to promote that God's name isn't important, or
that it shouldn't be spoken. The only thing I ever really advocated is that
His name, as originally spoken by Adam, belongs to a dialect that possibly
doesn't exist anymore. And upon reading this entire email, I found a few
places that seemed to be more "speculation" that "fact". Though there were
many valid facts discussed and a demonstration of great knowledge in the
matter, this brother made a few statements that can easily be argued and
proven irrelevant to his defense.

But I will choose to stop right there. I do not wish to argue.........and
for several reasons. But without dragging you down a long-winded road, I
will state the most important reason and simply leave it at that. Paul
clearly states in Romans 14, 1 Corinthians 8 and 1 Corinthians 10 (just to
name a few) the liberty we have in Christ, but also the sensitivity we
should have towards others concerning their own personal convictions. What
a lot of this really boils down to is that you have a personal conviction of
how our Father in Heaven should be addressed. I therefore, my brother,
cannot and should not try to convince you to address Him in any other
manner. If this is something that the Spirit of the Lord is personally
convicting you of, then by all means, do it. Do it just as you feel you
have been told.

I personally still do not feel any conviction that I must address Him in any
other way than the way that I have known Him for my entire faith walk. I
personally feel that we as believers can gain so much of this "knowledge"
that it nearly boxes us in to a state of religion which thrusts us into a
place that is totally irrelevant to our personal relationship with God the
Father, which we have through our faith in Jesus Christ (or as you would
prefer, Yeshuah). I am not saying that you are locked into this box of
religion, b/c as stated above, this is obviously a personal conviction which
very possibly came from the Holy Spirit.........and therefore, I do not want
to speak against such a conviction. But please understand that I myself do
not have this conviction. I can tell you that from my own personal
experience, my relationship with God has been nothing short of AMAZING. I
have spoken to Him and have had many many intimate conversations with Him,
and have seen Him move His hand mightily in my life like never before, all
while addressing Him as "God" and "Abba" and "Adoni" and "Lord" and "God of
Abraham, Issac and Jacob", etc, etc. He has blessed me in ways I nearly
thought impossible. He has answered many of my prayers in such profound,
evidential ways. He has kept His promises and has guided me like never
before, in just the past year alone. I have cried out to Him and He has
heard my cries and has responded, reaching out to me from the very throne
upon which He sits. And through all of this, HE gets the glory, honor and
praise. And when I tell others of Him, I refer to Him as my "Father in
Heaven", or "God" or "Lord", etc, etc, etc. And the more I glorify Him
before others, the more I can see He is pleased b/c as the Word says in
Hebrews 11:6 "without faith it is impossible to please Him...". The Word
also says in James 4:8 "Draw near to God and He will draw near to you".
Admittedly, most of my faith walk has been selfish and I have not drawn near
to God the way that I have in the past 2 years of my life. But Godfrey, in
the past two years, I have sought His face like never before, calling out to
His name (using all the names listed above), and He has drawn near to me in
such a profound way. So therefore, I can only tell you what He has shown me
and what He has done for me.

I am walking, living, breathing proof that God loves and cares for His
people and that the name I know Him by is an effective name to cry out to.
I do not feel that by forming my lips or tongue in a certain way, or by
using my throat or teeth to make a certain sound in a certain way, or by
pronouncing vowels in a certain form will get me any closer to my Maker or
pull me any further away from Him. If that is the case, may He show me
quickly and give me the same conviction He may have given you. But again, I
can only speak and share with you about how He has personally and powerfully
worked in my life, as my heart has cried out to Him from down here on this
earth. If this is something that sincerely convicts you, then please
continue to pursue Him in this manner.

I hope to see the Lord (or "YHWH") do many great things in your life. I
look forward to seeing Him transform your life into something that will
truly honor Him and bring Him the glory that He deserves. I look forward to
continue being your friend, and when you move to Charlotte we should definitely get together. Much love fam..."
Offline James  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, January 11, 2011 11:28:50 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
C wrote:
I hope to see the Lord (or "YHWH")do many great things in your life.


Do you get to choose which? Because I know who I would want.

I have had many conversations similar to this. Sadly, as nice as they are about, these are the kind of people I hate to talk with, because no amount of facts, evidence, reason, or discussion will effect them in any way. I can have a happy relationship with them, but I can't stand to discuss anything related to God with them because it is like talking to a brick wall that just smiles back at you.

And I really can't stand all the look at the good Jebus has done in my life stuff. I can find you just as many Muslims who will say look at what Allah has done in my life, etc. So there is really nothing to discuss with them at that point.

C wrote:
But I will choose to stop right there. I do not wish to argue


It's not arguing, nothing in your letter to him was even close to argumentative. All you did was try to discuss something important to you with him, so what he is really saying is, let's not bother to discuss this because I know I am right.
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline Noach  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, January 11, 2011 12:06:56 PM(UTC)
Noach
Joined: 7/5/2007(UTC)
Posts: 127

So your friends' letter can be summed up with:
I don't really want to talk about this anymore because I don't want to deal with what you are saying. So instead of being informed and knowledgable, I would rather just regurgitate what transloators and pastors have told me for years. That way, I won't really have to think. So you just call Him what you want "YHWH", and I'll just call Him what I want "LORD". And muslims can call Him what they want, and Jehovah's Witness' can call Him what they want, and so on, and that way we can all just get along. He know's who were talking about anyway.
Offline bigritchie  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, January 12, 2011 7:19:28 PM(UTC)
bigritchie
Joined: 4/15/2010(UTC)
Posts: 305
Location: USA

Your friend seems to have missed the section in the Tanakh about the Creator making in rain on both the wicked and the righteous.

And more "But Paul says" answers............

I can imagine right after hearing "Depart from me, I never knew you" virtually every single one will say "but Paul says".

Sigh, if only Christians were not so lazy and would simply take the time to read what the Tanakh says in context everytime "Paul says" something.

It truly is the same song and dance everytime also.

Offline issah  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, January 12, 2011 10:56:43 PM(UTC)
issah
Joined: 3/10/2010(UTC)
Posts: 38
Woman
Location: Wisconsin

I like your friend's focus on relationship over religion
Offline Richard  
#6 Posted : Thursday, January 13, 2011 2:29:05 AM(UTC)
Richard
Joined: 1/19/2010(UTC)
Posts: 695
Man
United States

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 7 post(s)
James wrote:
...it is like talking to a brick wall that just smiles back at you.


James, that is one of the best descriptions I have ever read. Simple, yet still creates a strong visual. Thanks!

Richard
Offline Daniel  
#7 Posted : Thursday, January 13, 2011 6:25:49 AM(UTC)
Daniel
Joined: 10/24/2010(UTC)
Posts: 694
Location: Florida

bigritchie wrote:
I can imagine right after hearing "Depart from me, I never knew you" virtually every single one will say "but Paul says"


LOL!
Nehemiah wrote:
"We carried our weapons with us at all times, even when we went for water" Nehemiah 4:23b

We would do well to follow Nehemiah's example! http://OurSafeHome.net
Offline sirgodfrey  
#8 Posted : Thursday, January 13, 2011 7:23:51 AM(UTC)
sirgodfrey
Joined: 10/2/2008(UTC)
Posts: 512
Location: North Carolina

Quote:


I can imagine right after hearing "Depart from me, I never knew you" virtually every single one will say "but Paul says".


LOLOL
Offline Walt  
#9 Posted : Thursday, January 13, 2011 7:54:25 AM(UTC)
Walt
Joined: 10/26/2008(UTC)
Posts: 374
Man

issah wrote:
I like your friend's focus on relationship over religion


Yup, that is a nice thing to use as a tool to take TRUTH out of the picture - can their be a true relationship if it is founded on lies & corruptions & deceptions?

Kind of like the internet where people pretend to be someone they are not (a middle aged man pretending to be a teen to get a girl) - is it a TRUE relationship?

To be a bit crude, it's like porn - not a true relationship, just a pretend one in the mind that one acts out as real - NOT the same as it's just a relationship with self.

MessiYah said His sheep would hear His voice (TRUTH) and Yah's Spirit would lead His to Truth - if one rejects Truth in favor of traditions of men, can it be believed they have a relationship????
Offline Walt  
#10 Posted : Thursday, January 13, 2011 7:56:55 AM(UTC)
Walt
Joined: 10/26/2008(UTC)
Posts: 374
Man

James wrote:
because it is like talking to a brick wall that just smiles back at you.



And sometimes the brick wall will hurl brick and mortar back at you
Offline sirgodfrey  
#11 Posted : Friday, January 14, 2011 9:54:35 PM(UTC)
sirgodfrey
Joined: 10/2/2008(UTC)
Posts: 512
Location: North Carolina

I wonder if satan blesses people to keep them duped, thinking that they have a legitimate relationship with Yah. Too many times I've heard people say that they've seen God "move in their lives."
Offline york mister  
#12 Posted : Friday, January 14, 2011 11:20:38 PM(UTC)
york mister
Joined: 4/8/2010(UTC)
Posts: 24
Location: uk

That's an interesting idea... I guess given satans track record and what he offered to Yahushua during the 40 days / 40 nights it's in his power to offer 'blessings'.
Offline tagim  
#13 Posted : Saturday, January 15, 2011 3:32:30 AM(UTC)
tagim
Joined: 9/30/2010(UTC)
Posts: 218
Man
Location: westen new york

Thanks: 3 times
But for the ones like Mother Teresa, whom we all must feel some concern about, does she repose in one, two or three?
Offline RidesWithYah  
#14 Posted : Saturday, January 15, 2011 4:05:39 AM(UTC)
RidesWithYah
Joined: 6/10/2008(UTC)
Posts: 331

I'm disappointed, but not too surprised, by the negative tone of many of the replies here.
So many of us have given up hope, it seems we don't even try anymore.

But we have to.
Godfrey's dialogue here is a great example of how we should be reaching out to those we left behind in mainstream Christianity.
If we don't, their blood will be on our hands.

Ezekiel 33:1-7
1Again the word of Yahweh came unto me, saying,
2Son of man, speak to the children of thy people, and say unto them, When I bring the sword upon a land, if the people of the land take a man of their coasts, and set him for their watchman:
3If when he seeth the sword come upon the land, he blow the trumpet, and warn the people;
4Then whosoever heareth the sound of the trumpet, and taketh not warning; if the sword come, and take him away, his blood shall be upon his own head.
5He heard the sound of the trumpet, and took not warning; his blood shall be upon him. But he that taketh warning shall deliver his soul.
6But if the watchman see the sword come, and blow not the trumpet, and the people be not warned; if the sword come, and take any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at the watchman's hand.
7So thou, O son of man, I have set thee a watchman unto the house of Israel; therefore thou shalt hear the word at my mouth, and warn them from me.

We have to keep sounding the warning, whether or not the people are responding.

Hosea 4:6
"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge:
because you have rejected knowledge,
I will also reject you,
that you shalt be no priest to me:
seeing you have forgotten the law of your God,
I will also forget your children.

You are not saved by what you know,
but you can be condemned by what you do not.
It isn't hard to verify the things we say.
With the tools available to us today, there really is no excuse.
It's so simple, so clear, yet so few see it:
"Master, What shall I do to inherit eternal life?"
Keep the law. Love Yah -- Love each other.
But today the law is largely forgotten --
And because of lawlessness, the love of many has grown cold.

DON'T STOP. KEEP ENGAGING ANYONE WHO WILL LISTEN.
YOU may be their only chance.
Offline Noel  
#15 Posted : Saturday, January 15, 2011 4:28:37 AM(UTC)
Noel
Joined: 9/27/2009(UTC)
Posts: 92
Location: UK

Quite right Rides With Yah. (can I call you Rides for short? !)

We cannot give up, although if our warnings are not heeded or even worse rejected, there comes a time to shake the dust off our feet and move on.

As to the can Satan bless question, we have been in a Toronto/Pensacola type christian situation where people falling around on the floor and laughing and shaking were clearly being 'blessed' by something. But I don't think it is Yah.

Far too much of what passes for 'religious experience' is emotional activity often orchestrated in a particular way using the age old methods of emotional control and music/ rythm to soften up the candidates. Sometimes smells, other sounds and visual stimulus. Add to that a soft spoken preacher giving out half truths, and hey presto!........you get the blessing you deserve.
Offline James  
#16 Posted : Saturday, January 15, 2011 7:44:43 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
I completely agree with you RWY, and I didn't mean to come across negative, I was only lamenting the fact that so many good kind people are happy to willfully live in ignorance.

Personally I will engage anyone who is even remotely interested, but when someone when someone shows no interest in discussing something, as Godfrey's friend seemed to, I stop and walk away. If they are not interested in discussing nothing you say will matter, and your time will be better spent elsewhere. In my own life there are a number of people with whom I discuss such matters, I don't know if it will ever do any good or if they will ever change their way of thinking, but they express interest so I will continue with hopes that perhaps a few seeds will take root. But there are others I know, and care about, who have no interest what soever in discussing it, or even thinking about it. With those people I simply disengage and let them be in hopes that one day they may come to find an interest.

Yahushua acted in much the same way, he would tell people the truth, and then if they needed clarification or questioned Him, He would engage, but if they didn't he simply let them walk away, and go on. After telling the rich man to give up everything to follow Him, the rich man walked away, Yahushua didn't continue after him and continue to try to explain why he should. The man had no interest, and Yahushua knew it.

Just my two cents though.
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline Daniel  
#17 Posted : Sunday, January 16, 2011 2:21:27 AM(UTC)
Daniel
Joined: 10/24/2010(UTC)
Posts: 694
Location: Florida

"Granny Ruth" sent us this, just this morning:

Quote:

Many of the Christian people that we have had association with consider that we are a cult or that we have "lost our way" or "have been led astray". Many members of this congregation have told me that they have been accused of being in a cult.

The accusations fly but we are not allowed to cross examine our accusers.

WHAT IS A CULT?

According to Webster's Dictionary "a cult represents a religious body that is unorthodox or spurious'" and "devotion to a great person, idea or thing".

The book "the Kingdom of the Cults" by Walter Martin quotes Dr. Charles Brandon "A cult is any religious group which differs significantly in some one or more respects which are regarded as the normative expression of religion in our total culture".

"The Book of Cults" by Bob Larson states that there are three things that cults share in common:

1. A centralized authority which tightly structures both philosophy and lifestyle.

2. A "we" versus "they" complex, pitting the supposed superior insights of the group against a hostile outside culture.

3. A commitment for each member to intensively proselytize the unconverted.

4. A entrenched isolationism that divorces the devotees from the realities of the world at large.

Larson's book goes on to inform us that "Christ [sic] is the source of determining error and truth" as the standard that is to be used to determine the validity of a cult. Furthermore, Larson states that cults possess secret knowledge or private understanding of some supposed truths or mysteries.

HOW DOES THIS APPLY TO US?

First of all, I have discovered that most Christians, and most Canadians for that matter, use words without understanding the meaning of them. They really don't know what a "cult" is however, by accusing us of being a cult, I think that the accuser is saying "I do not agree with what you believe and, therefore, what you believe is wrong".

The accuser is basing his accusation on whatever he thinks he believes or on whatever he thinks he has been taught.

The accuser sees us doing something outside the "normative expression of religion" in HIS culture and therefore, that makes us a cult. The radio pastor stated that we are a cult because we worship on Sabbath or Saturday which is outside his "normative expression of religion".

Most of these accusers do not actually know what a cult is. Quite frankly, I believe that if the accuser is a Baptist then, by his narrow definition of "cult", anyone that is not a Baptist is in a cult.

A VERY IMPORTANT point to remember is that the accusers are using CHRISTIANITY and its teachings as the yardstick to measure who is and who is not a cult. By this single point, WE ARE A "CULT".

Notice that Larson says that "Christ [sic] is the source of determining error and truth" and that is to be understood as the Christian view of what "Christ" taught. Notice what it does not say, it does not say "SCRIPTURE is the source of determining error and truth". And it does not say "Messiah Yeshua is the source of determining error and truth". What Larson teaches in his book is normative Christian understanding of what cults are therefore, I assume that when a typical NTOC Christian accuses us of being a cult, they are using his standards expressed in his book.

WHAT DO WE TEACH?

Notice that we do not exhibit any of the four points that cults share in common as Larson states in his book. We also do not have "secret knowledge" or "secret understanding" of some hidden spiritual "truth".

Those that have been attending our services for the past three years and anyone that has attended any of my classes has heard me say over and over again "check me out in the Scriptures". I insist that you examine the Scriptures for yourself. ALL of the people in leadership of CTOMC have stated that you must check out the Scriptures for yourself.

Every teaching I ever gave, I stated my sources for the information. When I taught about Christmas and Easter, I stated what the sources were. By the way, those sources were Christian resource books such as Unger's and Vine's.

If I, or any of the leadership of CTOMC that I have heard, begins a teaching with the statement "I believe that…", then you can be sure that there is Scripture to back up the teaching.

We also consider that ALL of Scripture is ONE COMPLETE Revelation from the Most High and that no part of Scripture is "done away with". There is no "old" and "new". There is only the Word of the Most High; the Davahr Adonai.

We also consider that Torah is the foundation of ALL of Scripture. Yeshua taught us this in the Gospels because He taught Torah and not something new. See Matthew 5:17 & 18.

THE ACCUSER AND THE ACCUSATION

When I am accused of being in a cult or being a cult leader, or, when a Christian blurts out "we are not under the law, but under grace", my first response is to defend my position and my beliefs. When I do this, I place the accuser in a position "over" me. I make the accuser out to be a pit bull attacking me when the truth is that the accuser is just the Taco Bell Chihuahua yapping at me. There's no substance to his accusation.

My problem is (and you might have this problem too, so don't be so smug about it), that if someone makes one of these comments to me, I think that I have to answer them.

Prov. 29:9 says, "When a wise man argues with a foolish one, he meets anger and ridicule without relief." My commentary on this is, "Never argue with a fool, those who are watching may not know who is which".

CATEGORIES OF ACCUSERS

Category One, The Christian leader or pastor or person who assumes that anything outside of the "normative expression of the Christian religion", as he understands it, is cultic. These people are NTOC. According to Category One, anyone espousing to our belief system is in a cult. Category One people are dogmatic about their Belief System. They actually have a centralized authority which might be the church or the teachings of the church. They believe that their understanding of "the truth" is superior to all other Belief Systems or even "the world". They are committed to intensively proselytize, or "winning the world for Christ". And they tend to isolate themselves from the rest of the world. Sound familiar?

Category Two, the Christian leader or pastor or person who sincerely believes that their "normative expression of the Christian religion" is correct but have some misgivings about some of the teachings. These people have read their Scripture and see an inconsistency in what is practiced as Christian tradition and what Scripture teaches. They may listen to the teachings in our chat room and may even accept that the teachings are from Scripture. However, they still are committed to the Belief System that says "Jesus has done away with the Old Testament and that time is past". They might not actually say we are a cult, but they consider that we have strayed from "the faith" and are "in error". They might ask how our "church" is doing and speak nicely to us but they won't attend and are otherwise not interested.

Category Three, the christian leader or pastor or person who will listen to the teachings of Messianic Judaism and accept that they are Scriptural and that Christianity should be following Scripture rather then Christian traditions. They may attend Messianic services, Bible studies, classes and conferences. However, they have no intention of changing their Belief System or lifestyle to line up with Scripture. They are comfortable where they are in the church. They may attend one of the churches that call us a cult and nod their heads in agreement and then come to a Messianic Shabbat service, class or conference and "agree" with what is taught there. They are a waste of our time and resources. They are neither hot nor cold.

Category Four, the Christian leader, pastor, or person who will listen AND EVEN HEAR the teachings of Messianic Israel and accept that they are Scriptural and that Christianity should be following Scripture rather then Christian traditions. They search out what we are teaching and try to understand what is being said. They examine every detail and ask good, honest questions. They want the answers. As they hear and understand Messianic Teachings, they begin to change their Belief System and lifestyle to line up with Scripture.

Some of these Christian leaders have abandoned "normative Christian traditions" such as "changing Sabbath from seventh day to first day". When this happens, some of the Christians leave their churches and go elsewhere. Some of these people have lost large segments of their congregations. There is a price to pay for following Scripture and being obedient to the Most High. These people will be rejected by some of their Christian "friends" and associates and even their families. After all, "they've joined a cult, haven't they"?

What Is Our Reaction To These People?

There is nothing that can be done about or with Category One people. They are dangerous in that they are teaching others error and they will be the least in the Kingdom of Heaven if they get there (see Matthew 5:19). There will be no reasoning with them. When they make the "cult" statement or ask a question, they are not seeking an answer. They are challenging. Just because they ask a question, doesn't mean I have to answer it.

Most of the Category One pastors have a vested interest in the "normative expression of the Christian religion". They usually pastor mega-churches or their primary teachings are prosperity or other quasi-biblical doctrines. In fact, our teachings are a threat to their Belief System and they will speak against us out of fear or even hatred.

Category Two and Three people are interested in Messianic and Jewish Roots things because they "tickle their fancy" or they are just interesting facts. They will attend a Passover Seder or even a Hebrew Roots class. They will contribute to a Messianic Ministry but that's it. They may not overtly make the "cult" statement. When they ask a question, they are really not seeking an answer.

Category Four people have "ears to hear" and "eyes to see" and they can be reasoned with. They are who we are!! When they ask a question, they want an answer. They will search Scripture to get an answer and they will look up any answer we give them.

About Questions And Answers

Something that I have discovered in this Messianic walk and talking to Canadians: People will ask an essay question but they want a bumper sticker answer. This applies to Christians and non-Christians alike.

Most Category One, Two and Three people will make a statement such as "Jesus made all foods clean" when we tell them that we do not eat pig meat. We haven't even said anything about clean or unclean.

They make the statement thinking they are a pit bull on attack when, in fact, they are only a little Chihuahua yapping at you. The statement, or question, is designed to put you in your place. They don't want an answer and they wouldn't hear an answer if you gave it to them.

I had to write a paper on this topic for Yeshiva and If you just read it and not looked up any of the Scriptures, it would take about 20 to 30 minutes.

On the other hand, the Category Four person will make the same statement by asking "didn't Jesus make all foods clean"? They want an answer. They will take the time to hear that Yeshua did not do away with Torah and therefore the food commandments are still in force.

A Misunderstanding Of Who We Are.

The whole issue boils down to Who We Are.

Category One, Two and Three pastors teach us that they are gentiles. They are made part of the "commonwealth of Israel" by spiritual adoption into the family of Abraham. Category One teaches such things as "Jesus took all the curses on Him and therefore, we gentile Christians receive only the blessings".

Category One, Two and Three want to remain gentiles. Their "adoption" is only spiritual and they are not required to comply with any of the "Old Testament" commandments.

By the way, Messianic Judaism also teaches this same philosophy. Christians are gentiles and they have their own "sabbath" and they do not have to follow Torah.

ADOPTION

There is NO Spiritual Adoption! Look it up for yourself.

If you are a Christian Believer in Messiah Yeshua, then you are called out by HASHEM. You are NOT the "Spiritual" seed of Abraham. This is Christian tradition and is not Biblical. In Galatians 3:26-29 we are told who we are according to Rav Sha'ul. In verse 29. He tells us, "If you belong to Messiah, you are the seed of Abraham" (Galatians 3:29, CJB). Notice the lack of the word "spiritual" here.

Another interesting Christian doctrine that does not line up with Scripture or reality is the idea that "we are adopted by faith into the family of G-d [sic]" and therefore, because we are only spiritually adopted, we are not under the law. The Christian gets all the blessings and none of the curses. This is utter nonsense. If the Christian is "adopted" into the family then they are a part of the family as though they were natural born to the family. They receive all the rights and privileges of the natural son. They would then be required to, and expected to, follow the rules of the family. There is no way that a family would adopt a child and then allow that child to live by whatever rules the child wanted to.

When a Christian is "adopted" into G-d's people, they are adopted into Israel. They receive GREAT blessings however, they are expected to obey the rules. As a mater of fact, receiving the blessings is predicated on following the rules (see Deuteronomy 28:1-2 and 13). On the other hand, when the adopted Christian wants all the blessings and does not want to follow the rules, they are asking for something that is not possible (see Deuteronomy 28:15-68).

When a "gentile" is adopted into Israel, they become Israel. They receive all of the blessings and curses of Israel as HASHEM spoke in the Torah. Yashua's work in no way changed that.

The Most High has no relationship with anyone else but Israel.

It is possible for a person to become "un-adopted". Another term for this is rejecting Yahweh.

CONCLUSIONS

Just because someone calls us a cult does not mean we are one.

Our Statement of Faith addresses who we are and what we believe. Our Beliefs are Scriptural Based and not part of man made traditions.

Most of those that accuse us of being a cult have not attended our services nor have they questioned us about what we believe. They have made assumptions based on their own prejudices and fears.

I do not want to "debate" anyone about what we believe. I do not think fast enough to engage in a verbal battle with someone. I am not a good "used car salesman" and I cannot convince someone of something that they do not want to hear anyway.

I will, on the other hand answer legitimate questions, IN WRITING by an accuser. However, I will also demand the right to ask questions too. As a matter of fact, I have a long list of questions to ask a typical NTOC accuser.

Messianic Believers should be ready to "give an answer" as Kefa says in 1 Peter 3:15. We believe that the Believer should "study to show thyself approved" (2 Timothy 2:15).

If a person comes to one of our services and then assumes that they understand what we believe and what we teach, they are "fools". They have terminal "bumper sticker" mentality. What we believe and what we teach cannot be condensed into one half hour TV show. It cannot be written on a 3 by 5 card or "post-it" note. But that is what is expected. These people cannot be reached and they don't want to anyway. I ask that, on the way out, they knock the dust from their feet so they don't take any of our dust with them.

Yeshua said that "narrow is the way that leads to life" (Matthew 7:14) and "wide is the road that leads to destruction" (Matthew 7:13).

Nehemiah wrote:
"We carried our weapons with us at all times, even when we went for water" Nehemiah 4:23b

We would do well to follow Nehemiah's example! http://OurSafeHome.net
Offline Richard  
#18 Posted : Sunday, January 16, 2011 3:18:24 AM(UTC)
Richard
Joined: 1/19/2010(UTC)
Posts: 695
Man
United States

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 7 post(s)
What is an "NTOC Christian"?
Offline Richard  
#19 Posted : Sunday, January 16, 2011 3:36:39 AM(UTC)
Richard
Joined: 1/19/2010(UTC)
Posts: 695
Man
United States

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 7 post(s)
"Rav Shaw'ul?" "HASHEM?" "G-d?"

And we're supposed to give ear to this person?
Offline Daniel  
#20 Posted : Sunday, January 16, 2011 4:32:24 AM(UTC)
Daniel
Joined: 10/24/2010(UTC)
Posts: 694
Location: Florida

flintface wrote:
What is an "NTOC Christian"?

Non Torah Observant Christian
Nehemiah wrote:
"We carried our weapons with us at all times, even when we went for water" Nehemiah 4:23b

We would do well to follow Nehemiah's example! http://OurSafeHome.net
Offline Daniel  
#21 Posted : Sunday, January 16, 2011 4:49:24 AM(UTC)
Daniel
Joined: 10/24/2010(UTC)
Posts: 694
Location: Florida

flintface wrote:
And we're supposed to give ear to this person?


The modern world's two favorite Jews are Ben and Jerry.

They produce over 110 flavors of ice cream.

Richard, there are 109 other flavors that are not the kind that you prefer.

This author likes chunks of cookie dough in his ice cream.

You don't like his 'chunks of cookie dough' and seem to want to pour vinegar on his dish of ice cream.

Don't do that. 'Tunnel' around an 'eat' the parts that you like.

Try this phrase out: "I don't like his pro-Pauline references, not his avoidance of using YHWH's proper name, but he makes some good points..."

Doesn't that sound better than "He doesn't like the precise flavor of Jewish [Ben & Jerry's] ice cream that I like, so we shouldn't listen to anything he says."

Dan-"Chunky-Monkey"-Nafe


See all of Ben & Jerry's flavors by clicking here.
Nehemiah wrote:
"We carried our weapons with us at all times, even when we went for water" Nehemiah 4:23b

We would do well to follow Nehemiah's example! http://OurSafeHome.net
Offline bigritchie  
#22 Posted : Sunday, January 16, 2011 7:12:27 AM(UTC)
bigritchie
Joined: 4/15/2010(UTC)
Posts: 305
Location: USA

Daniel wrote:
Non Torah Observant Christian


Haha, isn't that kind of redundant, or like a double negative.
Offline Daniel  
#23 Posted : Monday, January 17, 2011 9:12:02 AM(UTC)
Daniel
Joined: 10/24/2010(UTC)
Posts: 694
Location: Florida

bigritchie wrote:
Haha, isn't that kind of redundant, or like a double negative.


Then there are the MNTOC's...

[Militantly Non Torah Observant Christians]
Nehemiah wrote:
"We carried our weapons with us at all times, even when we went for water" Nehemiah 4:23b

We would do well to follow Nehemiah's example! http://OurSafeHome.net
Offline Matthew  
#24 Posted : Monday, January 17, 2011 1:22:55 PM(UTC)
Matthew
Joined: 10/3/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,191
Man
Location: São Paulo, Brazil

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Noel wrote:
As to the can Satan bless question, we have been in a Toronto/Pensacola type christian situation where people falling around on the floor and laughing and shaking were clearly being 'blessed' by something. But I don't think it is Yah.


Blessed by the Kundalini Spirit perhaps? ;)
Offline Richard  
#25 Posted : Tuesday, January 18, 2011 3:53:05 AM(UTC)
Richard
Joined: 1/19/2010(UTC)
Posts: 695
Man
United States

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 7 post(s)
Daniel,

I regretted my phrasing as soon as I had pressed the POST button, but I figured I would leave my post as is rather than muck up the thread with an edit. I seem to recall James or some other moderator telling us that editing a post causes the thread to disappear.

You're right: even Billy Graham might have managed to squeeze out a word of truth every once in a while. I suppose Granny Ruth's obvious love for rabbinic Judaism pressed hard upon my "Flame On!" button. *sigh* I gotta learn how to sit on my hands when reading the enemy's stuff.
Offline James  
#26 Posted : Tuesday, January 18, 2011 5:14:39 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
flintface wrote:
I seem to recall James or some other moderator telling us that editing a post causes the thread to disappear.


That's no longer the case. Now that we have my account set up with moderator permissions, I can approve the edits,and keep the thread from disappearing.
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline Daniel  
#27 Posted : Tuesday, January 18, 2011 5:21:15 AM(UTC)
Daniel
Joined: 10/24/2010(UTC)
Posts: 694
Location: Florida

flintface wrote:
You're right: even Billy Graham might have managed to squeeze out a word of truth every once in a while.


Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

The guy whose letter I was quoting hasn't quite gotten to where you are, yet.

You, he and I mutually agree on more things that we would agree on with Billy Graham.

[in my best black preacher voice] Can I get an "a-men"?

Dan-"Celebrate-the-similarities-and-discuss-the differences"-Nafe
Nehemiah wrote:
"We carried our weapons with us at all times, even when we went for water" Nehemiah 4:23b

We would do well to follow Nehemiah's example! http://OurSafeHome.net
User is suspended until 10/2/2038 12:51:00 PM(UTC) berbatov  
#28 Posted : Monday, February 14, 2011 6:44:02 AM(UTC)
berbatov
Joined: 2/10/2011(UTC)
Posts: 1
Location: berbatov

The Best ^^"
Offline VinceB.  
#29 Posted : Monday, February 14, 2011 4:46:31 PM(UTC)
VinceB.
Joined: 12/2/2010(UTC)
Posts: 228

as for me - I am also having my own issues with family friends and loved ones related to the truth verses Pauline Doctrine (the doctrine which produces faith, belief, and all things Christianity)...sharing with Christians invokes a wall that takes an act of God to penetrate; not to even mention all the residual effects of Paul's teachings...

Pauline Doctrine teaches a triune god, rather than a single God manifesting Himself in three distinct separate manifestations throughout human history, works in favor of all things religious which satan loves, and which Yah hates...

it's sad on so many levels - because insofar as I can tell, when the devil makes his move (in the days ahead - probably during the gog magog wars right around the next corner), he'll produce a triune god just as what Paul teaches and Christians believe...
HWHY
Offline Daniel  
#30 Posted : Tuesday, February 15, 2011 3:53:45 AM(UTC)
Daniel
Joined: 10/24/2010(UTC)
Posts: 694
Location: Florida

VinceB. wrote:
when the devil makes his move (in the days ahead - probably during the gog magog wars right around the next corner)...



You mean like this?
UserPostedImage

Here is my speculation: The "AC" is NOT Amadeenajad, it is who ever replaces Amadeenajad. Whomever ends up as the leader of this popular revolt will be my prime suspect. (Especially if he turns out to be a Turk-man! )
Nehemiah wrote:
"We carried our weapons with us at all times, even when we went for water" Nehemiah 4:23b

We would do well to follow Nehemiah's example! http://OurSafeHome.net
Offline Daniel  
#31 Posted : Tuesday, February 15, 2011 6:42:29 AM(UTC)
Daniel
Joined: 10/24/2010(UTC)
Posts: 694
Location: Florida

Protests breaking out in Bahrain, too.
FoxNews wrote:
Oppositions groups aren't calling for the ruling Sunni monarchy to be ousted, but they do want an end to its grip on key decisions and government posts.
[snip]
Many in the square waved Bahraini flags and chanted: "No Sunnis, no Shiites. We are all Bahrainis." It also appeared they were planning for the long haul.


Read more:here


Once the muslim world drops the 1300 year old Sunni vs. Shiite conflict and unites, we are in for big trouble...
Nehemiah wrote:
"We carried our weapons with us at all times, even when we went for water" Nehemiah 4:23b

We would do well to follow Nehemiah's example! http://OurSafeHome.net
Offline VinceB.  
#32 Posted : Tuesday, February 15, 2011 3:18:59 PM(UTC)
VinceB.
Joined: 12/2/2010(UTC)
Posts: 228

Daniel wrote:
You mean like this?
UserPostedImage

Here is my speculation: The "AC" is NOT Amadeenajad, it is who ever replaces Amadeenajad. Whomever ends up as the leader of this popular revolt will be my prime suspect. (Especially if he turns out to be a Turk-man! )



I confess I'm a bit confused about the whole AC thing...

modern day Yisrael is more desert than likened to the Garden of Yah; or as the 12 spies gave witness to Moseh: which will be the condition of the land when Yahowah calls His children back home...and Yah makes clear He knows just how deep the hatred of Esau goes against Yisrael/Ya'aqob whom Esau believes usurpted his birthright, forgetting it was he himself that sold it to feed a 'want': an appetite he had...does it make practical sense that Esau's descendants would want to take back what they believe Yisrael stole from them? And I am a bit confused about whether modern day 'Jews' are the actual descendants of Ya'aqob verses descendants of Esau masquerading as Yah's 12 tribes?

Hillary Clinton is all over the middle east, stirring up issues - she wants the gog magog war so as to produce its messiah; of which it seems she's a good foot soldier toward...


a Turk as a decendent of Esau, masquerading as a decendent of Yisrael, a Turk the holy see can endorse promoting Paul's triune god that sees Allah and Yah as synonymous so as not to leave the Islamists without representation - that promotes Judaism, and the Torah as taught via the Babylonian Tulmud...(deep breath...long sentence)...would be at the top of my list as AC, as in antiChrestus as opposed to Sha'uwl's antichrist...

perhaps the mistake I make is not ditching all things Pauline Doctrine related? I mean, I seem to think of AC in terms that Christians see things transpiring (forgive me, I've been brainwashed to think like Paul from my birth as all Christians have...); so rather than seeing AC as Paul would have it - via pauline filters, I need to remember/remind myself to think of AC in terms of how Daniel saw him - as Revelation describes him; would save me a lot of confusion? Seems Christianities rendering of AC is a moot point by virtue of the fact Sha'uwl didn't know what the heck he was talking about 90% of the time; and by default: Christian apologists don't know any better?

My apologizes for my being so long winded - I confess, I am confused about how these last days will go down...what's going on in the middle east can't be good - and while we're all looking over there; what China doing over here? What happens to us if we lose our reserve currency status? If Yellowstone blows? etc.
HWHY
Offline Matthew  
#33 Posted : Tuesday, February 15, 2011 4:58:13 PM(UTC)
Matthew
Joined: 10/3/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,191
Man
Location: São Paulo, Brazil

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Ken Power does good work explaining it all in Future History. The AC will be European, most likely from the Balkans region, though Grecian region is not ruled out either. See Daniel 8:15-27. Check out chapter 11 of Future History.

Gog will be an Islamic leader, Muslims will call him the Mahdi.
Offline cgb2  
#34 Posted : Wednesday, February 16, 2011 2:43:13 AM(UTC)
cgb2
Joined: 5/14/2010(UTC)
Posts: 689
Location: Colorado

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 24 time(s) in 18 post(s)
Not sure about this conspiratorial view, but sure does seem to be the way it's working out:
http://www.threeworldwars.com/albert-pike2.htm
Offline Daniel  
#35 Posted : Wednesday, February 16, 2011 4:34:36 AM(UTC)
Daniel
Joined: 10/24/2010(UTC)
Posts: 694
Location: Florida

Protests breaking out in Libya.

Original article here.
FoxNews wrote:
Tuesday's demonstration began in front of the local security headquarters after Libyan troops raided the house of rights advocate Fathi Tarbel in Benghazi and took him away, according to a Switzerland-based activist Fathi al-Warfali.


I've never seen pan-Arabic protests like these, ever!
Nehemiah wrote:
"We carried our weapons with us at all times, even when we went for water" Nehemiah 4:23b

We would do well to follow Nehemiah's example! http://OurSafeHome.net
Offline Daniel  
#36 Posted : Thursday, February 17, 2011 4:16:21 AM(UTC)
Daniel
Joined: 10/24/2010(UTC)
Posts: 694
Location: Florida

FoxNews wrote:
Thousands of Yemenis protest nationwide

SANAA, Yemen – Several thousand Yemeni protesters defied appeals for calm from the military and the country's most influential Islamic cleric and marched through the capital on Thursday, pressing on with their campaign to oust the U.S.-allied president.


Read more: here.

We are in the last two minutes of the game!

PS: POD readers will recall that the city of Sanaa is where the un-redacted copy of al-Qur'an was discovered in the rafters of a mosque. Much like the DSS, the Sanaa Manuscript has been buried by the religious authorities (for entirely different reasons!)
Nehemiah wrote:
"We carried our weapons with us at all times, even when we went for water" Nehemiah 4:23b

We would do well to follow Nehemiah's example! http://OurSafeHome.net
Offline FredSnell  
#37 Posted : Thursday, February 17, 2011 5:30:46 AM(UTC)
FredSnell
Joined: 1/29/2011(UTC)
Posts: 874
Location: Houston, Texas

Thanks: 14 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Hey Daniel, will this be real democracy in action, mob rules? Will Muslims be ruling with 50.1% over the other 49.9%?

"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner. Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the results." Benjamin Franklin

Offline Daniel  
#38 Posted : Thursday, February 17, 2011 9:03:02 AM(UTC)
Daniel
Joined: 10/24/2010(UTC)
Posts: 694
Location: Florida

encounterHim wrote:
Hey Daniel, will this be real democracy in action, mob rules? Will Muslims be ruling with 50.1% over the other 49.9%?


99.95% of the population is Muslim.

"Democracy" is simply 'the tyranny of the majority'.
Nehemiah wrote:
"We carried our weapons with us at all times, even when we went for water" Nehemiah 4:23b

We would do well to follow Nehemiah's example! http://OurSafeHome.net
Offline sirgodfrey  
#39 Posted : Wednesday, April 20, 2011 4:16:56 AM(UTC)
sirgodfrey
Joined: 10/2/2008(UTC)
Posts: 512
Location: North Carolina

A co-worker came into my office today and asked me if she could have one of my packs of crackers (something like Lance or whatever). She noticed that I hesitated for a moment and asked me why. I told her the reason was because it was Passover and I was thinking about how God said not to eat bread/bread products (?) containing leaven, and told her that there are 7 parties/celebrations that God established for His people. She said that she needed to read the bible more after what I told her, and said she didn't know that. She proceeded to tell me that a friend of hers (not in relation to Passover) told her that she was supposed to pick a food that she craved, and to not eat that food for 40 days. She then continued saying that she would "stick to what she knew", grabbed the pack of crackers, then walked out and thanked me. I felt horrible.

My mind got to turning and there were several things that bothered me about our short exchange. She admitted she needed to study more, and didn't know about what I was saying to her. Then said she would stick to what she knew (I suppose concerning what her friend told her). But if her friend told her something, and she believed it, why would she not take into account what I was saying and say, "Well maybe I'll check that out."

Brothers and sisters, I became so sad within and ... just very sad. I try not to give up on people in general, but viewing so many attitudes like this is simply amazing. What makes it very grievous is the fact that it is people who say they love God etc. I needed an outlet so decided to post what transpired a little earlier here. I learned recently that it's not good to keep feelings balled up inside, as it leads to problematic thinking, emotional trauma, etc.
Offline James  
#40 Posted : Wednesday, April 20, 2011 5:28:25 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
Godfrey,

It sounds to me she was more confused by being told one thing by her friend, and another by you, and not knowing Scripture, nor wanting to take the time to learn it, she wasn't going to do either.

This is the default position it seems of most. It's why churches are so popular. The attendees don't want to look anything up or learn it for themselves, so they pick a pastor who says things to make them feel good, and they believe what he says, because it feels good.
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline sirgodfrey  
#41 Posted : Wednesday, April 20, 2011 5:46:49 AM(UTC)
sirgodfrey
Joined: 10/2/2008(UTC)
Posts: 512
Location: North Carolina

It would seem to me that if a person was "confused", they would have questions in their head, and would seek to resolve the "confusion." If they love God.
Offline James  
#42 Posted : Wednesday, April 20, 2011 7:38:45 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 216 time(s) in 149 post(s)
The problem is most people can't be bothered to think for themselves or resolve a conflict for themselves. They would rather just ignore it, it's more comfortable that way.
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline Richard  
#43 Posted : Thursday, April 21, 2011 9:00:04 AM(UTC)
Richard
Joined: 1/19/2010(UTC)
Posts: 695
Man
United States

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 7 post(s)
Godfrey, that situation would have saddened me as well. James is right. The way which leads to death is wide and relatively obstacle-free, and there are many who will follow its path. It is easier to continue slumbering while being massaged by soothing lies than it is to stand up and hack our way out of the tangled growth of lies we're surrounded by.
Offline VinceB.  
#44 Posted : Thursday, April 21, 2011 9:44:12 AM(UTC)
VinceB.
Joined: 12/2/2010(UTC)
Posts: 228

sirgodfrey wrote:
It would seem to me that if a person was "confused", they would have questions in their head, and would seek to resolve the "confusion." If they love God.

'amein sirgodfrey; but do you know what it takes for those enslaved by religious schemes with their dogmas to break free long enough to check the truth and proof out for themselves? It takes, I believe, an act of Yahowah to unhinge the scheme from a person's brain/thoughts/thinking...

Coming out of both RCC and Protestant to embrace Yah His way and on His terms (via His 7 called out Feasts, and His Shabbats...I'll add: long live the Torah!) and to do it on His terms: it takes, from a human perspective looking up from the scheme, is the same as stepping out into the abyss, in their denying what they've been brainwashed to believe in all their life, and this process is also done via repetition...their faith isnt big enough in Yah to know and understand Yah's really that big. That He'll catch them before they fall (since denying what it is they believe in is the same as going to go to hell - so fear keeps 'em under the religious tent); which, if and when they do step out, generally is followed by a spark in all their perceived darkness; coupled with the fact they find out in that state of abyss that Yah doesn't zap 'em at all when they shelf their religion long enough to think for themselves without their biases...rather they have a chance to see Yah's right and Paul/muhammed/whomever is dead wrong...what they choose to do with this new information (just as what Yada pointed out about Jerry Falwell) is between each person and Yah...

In short:

Yah's BIG, as we at YY know, but their religious schemes make God out to be so small, so small that should they turn their back on their religious beliefs and faiths, for just one second - long enough to truly check out the facts - to them is the same as stepping away from God with one foot and going to hell with the other...

Edited by user Thursday, April 21, 2011 11:12:17 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

HWHY
Offline FredSnell  
#45 Posted : Thursday, April 21, 2011 10:58:41 AM(UTC)
FredSnell
Joined: 1/29/2011(UTC)
Posts: 874
Location: Houston, Texas

Thanks: 14 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
One last song that just relaxes a person when reading the Word...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGkziOPs0xo

and really, it pretty much sums up everything for me. Adios amigos...tomorrow!!!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.