John 19:19 "And Pilate wrote a title too, and put it on the stake, and it was written: YAHUSHUA OF NATSARETH, THE SOVEREIGN OF THE YAHUDIM. Many of the Yahudim therefore read this title, for the place where Yahushua was impaled was near the city, and it was writ- ten in Hebrew, in Greek, in Roman."

How would His Name appear in the three different languages on the stake?

I came across this article on the seekgod.ca website. I just quickly brushed through the article, actually skipped through to see the conclusion, but noticed this bit at the end:

Hebrew: Yeshua haNotzri Melech haYehudim
Greek: Iesous ho Nazoraios ho Basileus ton Ioudaion
Latin: Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum

Its funny how his whole site contradicts what he is saying. Name of site: Are you seeking God? When clearly he knows and states on that page that God refers to Baal. Its funny man! I totally agree with both of yall! But i just briefly brushed thru that article and i could tell it was BS.

DD, I think you are talking about the Hebrew phrase on the epitath including the acrostic YHWH.

Yahushua HaNatzaret v'Melech HaYahudim

Thus you get the acrostic YHWH.

It's a nice thought, but bad Hebrew.

This phrase would mean Yahushua of Natzaret AND the King of the Jews.

The Hebrew conjunction, waw, is not needed

Yahushua HaNatzaret Melech HaYahudim is a perfectly logical and accurate rendering of what the Hebrew might have said.


The real issue here is that the leadership could not accept Yahushua to be declared the King of the Yahudim, because that denotes Messiahship.

Great clip, InHisName. I covered a lot of this same material in my FH chapter on Babylon, but Rood does a better job tying it all together, I'm thinking. What I want to know is, what's with the "Moses on Sinai" get-up? He used to dress up like an orthodox rabbi. I'd just love to see the guy, for once, in blue jeans and a sweatshirt.

kp

Yes, I did enjoy that clip, but embarrassingly it is not the one I meant to leave here!

Since you mentioned it, yes the period attire was a little distracting. But I guarantee, there will never be an Easter Egg in my house again!



Here, is the clip I intended for this discussion.

This specific segment shows the wall behind the crucifixion site (Ron Wyatt's site) and the cutout shelves that are proposed to have held the signs. Although it does not really address the content of the signs, it does address the possibility of more than one sign and their being readable from a reasonable distance.

I found the evidence presented very exciting. I had read about the discovery before, but not with the pictures. Very exciting.

After watching all 27 clips I am curious as to the relationship of the presenter (Jonathon Gray) to Mr Wyatt. Gray talks as if he was part of the Wyatt's team, but I see little evidence of that and he is hawking his own book and video?? Anyone know of the connection?